Mar 3: "We won the war."
Mar 7: "We defeated Iran."
Mar 9: "We must attack Iran." "The war is ending almost completely, and very beautifully."
Mar 12: "We did win, but we haven't won completely yet."
Mar 13: "We won the war."
Mar 14: "Please help us."
Mar 15: "If you don't help us, I will certainly remember it."
Mar 16: "Actually, we don't need any help at all." "I was just testing to see who's listening to me." "If NATO doesn't help, they will suffer something very bad."
Mar 17: "We neither need nor want NATO's help." "I don't need Congressional approval to withdraw from NATO."
Mar 18: "Our allies must cooperate in reopening the Strait of Hormuz."
Mar 19: "US allies need to get a grip -step up and help open the Strait of Hormuz"
Mar 20: "NATO are cowards."
Mar 21: "We don't use it, we don't need to open it."
Mar 22: "This is the last time. I will give Iran 48 hours." "Iran is Dead"
Mar 23: "We are giving them more time."
Mar 24: "The war is nearing its end."
Mar 25: "We are still negotiating."
Mar 26: "Iran is begging for peace. They gave us a gift. We will give them more time."
Mar 27: "Talks with iran are going very well"
Mar 28: "War will be over soon"
Mar 29: "Maybe we take Kharg island, maybe we dont"
Mar 30: "Open the Strait or we will obliterate all energy infrastructure and oil wells"
Mar 31: "We dont need the strait, we got plenty of oil. Get it yourself UK."
April 1: "Iran wants a ceasefire" / "Strongly considering pulling out of NATO" / "There's no deal with Iran"
April 3:"We can take their oil and make a fortune"
April 5:"Open the fuckin strait you crazy bastards or youll be living in hell"
April 6:"US could charge for strait of hormuz passage"
April 7:"A whole civilization will die tonight"
April 8:"Iran accepts ceasefire, the strait is opened" *strait closed*
April 9:"NATO allies have days to reopen the strait"
April 10:"Iran has no cards"
April 11:"We're going to open up the strait"
April 12:"US will blockade the strait"
6648
llixaa19 hr ago
+1796
The crazy part is sending Kushner to negotiate with Iran when [Netanyahu slept in Kushner's family home](https://www.jpost.com/american-politics/when-netanyahu-slept-at-the-kushners-and-other-media-tales-of-trumps-jewish-confidantes-481486) and even in Jared Kushner's own BED. Yet people are surprised that Trump administration is putting Israel first.
1796
Disastrous_Usual488617 hr ago
+84
Netanyahu said some years ago that Fred Trump was one of his closest mentors. Netanyahu worked in New York early in his career and the Trumps befriended him. This is going back to the 70s iirc, so people believing Trump was ever going to hold Israel accountable for anything was laughable.
84
Waldo6810 hr ago
+19
The AIPAC dollars are also carrying a lot of weight im sure
19
SuppressWarnings18 hr ago
+299
What, did Netanyahu bed Jared Kushner's own wife, too?
It disgusts me that a sitting president is someone that I could see that being a legitimate bargaining chip for, despite recognizing how unlikely that it's the first.
299
JX_JR18 hr ago
+260
> What, did Netanyahu bed Jared Kushner's own wife, too?
Odd to refer to her as that instead of her preferred title "Trump's sexiest daughter."
260
SuppressWarnings18 hr ago
+80
I wouldn't be able to type that phrase without wishing to immerse my hands in an industrial fryer with integrated blender attachment.
I've been trying my best to just not think about the horror that is that family and being non-consensually born into it.
80
alteraan17 hr ago
+10
succinct American experience
10
china-blast17 hr ago
+17
This is my daughter Ivanka. This is my other daughter, Ivanka's sister
17
Gaff_Daddy17 hr ago
+13
Jared was a kid and had to give up his room for the guest when Bibi was there to visit Jared’s dad.
13
BrianDetomes18 hr ago
+92
AND... Trump pardoned Kushners father to get him out of jail.
...america.
92
VanbyRiveronbucket17 hr ago
+25
Then made the jailbird Ambassador to France,…
25
Character_Bug_186218 hr ago
+10
I wouldn’t be surprised, these dweebs are really really weird, but is the jpost the best source out there?
10
nnnope118 hr ago
+315
I love that none of them even have to be paraphrased. This is all straight out of his mouth/rim.
This is what concepts of a plan looks like.
315
gliese8918 hr ago
+101
Some of them are paraphrased but yes it doesn’t need to be. I’m too lazy to put together an unparaphrased version. I know it’s paraphrased because some of the real ones are less coherent.
101
nnnope118 hr ago
+18
Oh ok. Still, the best ones are straight up word for word
18
Rafoel19 hr ago
+344
This is a piece of art and it gets better every day, let's make sure it gets preserved for future generations.
344
VermillionOcean18 hr ago
+170
You might call it... the art of the deal
170
ephesusa17 hr ago
+6
Tremendeous.
6
YoHabloEscargot18 hr ago
+137
My prediction:
April 13: “We have complete control of the Strait. Total control. Nobody’s ever seen anything like it.”
April 14: “We may not need control of the Strait. Frankly, it’s overrated.”
April 15: “Iran must agree to terms immediately or consequences will be catastrophic beyond anything ever seen.”
April 16: “We are in very productive talks with Iran. Tremendous progress.”
April 17: “Our allies have failed us again. We may handle this alone.”
April 18: “We never needed anyone. This was always our plan.”
April 19: “The war is officially over. A great victory. But we are prepared to act if necessary.”
137
Deksametazon_v218 hr ago
+42
and 100+ dead each day
42
Ghost_of_Till17 hr ago
+31
You're not wrong.
The funny thing is, if you shuffled those randomly, what comes out would be just as likely.
Insanity.
31
QuantumLettuce202519 hr ago
+124
I would like to subscribe to this for daily updates.
124
QuietKanuk18 hr ago
+10
Easy to do. Press the button at the end of the post with 3 dots, and select "follow comment"
I used "save" so I can refer to it later.
10
hyrule518 hr ago
+44
The workings of a diseased mind that has never known hardship, empathy, humility or intellectual curiosity
44
2010_12_2418 hr ago
+24
Shart of the Deal
24
Overnoww18 hr ago
+39
This man is in the White House when he should really be in a room with padded white walls.
Imagine being a person who obsessed over Joe Biden's cognitive state and not saying a f****** peep about this guy.
39
Atraxa-and118 hr ago
+29
> e can take their oil and make a fortune"
>
> April 5:"Open the fuckin strait you crazy bastards or youll be living in hell"
>
> April 6:"US could charge for strait of hormuz passage"
>
> April 7:"A whole civilization will die tonight"
>
> April 8:"Iran accepts ceasefire, the strait is opened" strait closed
Israel Bombs Lebanon
29
Federal_Medium583318 hr ago
+11
Sounds like a narcissistic abuse relationship.
11
AlienSausage20 hr ago
+12557
He want the tolls himself.
12557
RedLanternScythe20 hr ago
+4530
That's exactly it. Like a mob boss, he wants a cut of everything
4530
LeftHookLarry1219 hr ago
+2442
We joke, but he quite literally said this like 5 days ago in an interview I watched lol
A reporter asked him if it’s possible we’d see Iran collecting a toll and he said (I’m paraphrasing) , “why not we collect a toll? I’d much rather see that. Your question would be more accurate if you asked if the U.S. would collect a toll.”
He also posted on social media (or maybe said in an interview, I can’t remember) about a “joint venture” between U.S. and Iran to toll the straight.
Dangerous and deluded. Republican voters really fucked us all and we should not forgive them as they inevitably play dumb later on. Sadly, these f*** ups can’t really be fixed. American hegemony is lost and the consequences (bad and good) will reverberate throughout the remainder of the century.
It’s easier to tear things down than to build them up.
2442
ithilain19 hr ago
+539
> we should not forgive republican voters when they inevitably play dumb later on
I mean I don't think they'd be playing dumb in that case, one of the big campaign promises Trump had was no new wars and that Biden/Harris would start WW3 somehow. Sure, anyone with 2 braincells to rub together could see that the opposite was more likely to happen, but that just points to them being actually dumb, not just playing dumb
539
captmarx19 hr ago
+327
Somehow, they are dumb AND they’re playing dumb, at the same time.
327
Frostemane19 hr ago
+150
They're dumb because they believed him when he said "no new wars", and they're playing dumb by saying shit like "Iran has always been at war with us!!! This isn't a new war!!!!!"
150
worst_brain_ever18 hr ago
+118
He didn't mean no new wars, he meant "No! New wars!"
118
socksmum116 hr ago
+22
I mean as an Australian I feel like Trump has fucked us all. I know our government has left us in a precarious position by off shoring our fuel, but come on America pull your head out of your arse.( obs targeted towards the knobs who support him)
22
darienrude_dankstorm18 hr ago
+10
I don't know what you mean by "we joke", I thought the previous commenters are clearly referencing his words.
10
BPMMPB20 hr ago
+229
It will be lifted in two days, after all of his friends have bought the dip
229
Bluesphamy18 hr ago
+71
It's crazy that part of what makes him scandal proof are the overwhelming number of scandals
71
Penis_Wart16 hr ago
+59
> what makes him scandal proof are ~~the overwhelming number of scandals~~ the legislative and judicial branches doing nothing to stop him.
59
oneplustwothreemama20 hr ago
+414
Pay the troll …toll ….!!
414
Ancient-Bat175519 hr ago
+73
We should write a song about it;
Do not diddle kids, it's no good diddling kids.
I wouldn't do it with anybody younger than my daughter,
Not little kids, gotta be big,
Older than my wife, older than my daughter,
Something like that!
73
Nfgzebrahed18 hr ago
+33
"There is no quicker way for people to think that you are friends with Epstein than by giving a speech about it!"
33
DuncanConnell20 hr ago
+88
If you wanna get into this boys soul
88
Pestilence_XIV20 hr ago
+47
Hole*
47
ah_no_wah20 hr ago
+75
Because of the implications
75
Gluroo20 hr ago
+51
There might be no man alive more fitting for the implications of r*** and pedophilia than Donald J Trump
51
Blahblahman2320 hr ago
+45
I swear everywhere I go. It could be a food prep sublistnook, there’s an it’s always sunny reference
45
Rocco_Gibraltar19 hr ago
+11
Do the other sublistnooks have a spaghetti policy?
11
AppealConsistent980119 hr ago
+6
No, but they are affluent in bird law.
6
human_eyes20 hr ago
+34
Food prep? That's Charlie work
34
daniu19 hr ago
+35
I swear Vance got sent with the offer "now that you get a fee for every ship you let through, give us a part or we'll keep bombing you", and then got kicked out by them for such a tone deaf and insane offer. Trump just can't grasp the concept then not being in it to enrich themselves without boundaries.
35
MorrowPlotting19 hr ago
+1229
And do what, exactly?
You’re telling me the US Navy will use military force against Chinese ships attempting to freely travel in international waters? Will we use military force against NATO allies? What about Daddy Putin?
If ever there was a TACO in our near future, it’s now. Trump won’t follow through on this and the US is weaker because of his bluff.
1229
rd197016 hr ago
+339
And Iran just has to sit back and laugh.
Trump has really painted himself into a corner with this. The American military now has to either attack the ships of countries like China or put it's tail between its legs and p**** out.
339
Due-Currency-319314 hr ago
+37
Trump snatches defeat, not from the jaws of victory because there is none for the US, but at every other opportunity. He wanted a war despite already having a war in Ukraine. But he wanted his own war not one that Biden had anything to do with.
37
Prestigious_Yak855115 hr ago
+86
Iran could also release another slapping lego song. Cant wait!
86
PlainBread9 hr ago
+33
I wish they'd release the unredacted Epstein Files instead.
33
-Yazilliclick-15 hr ago
+54
So that in a few days he can lift his own blockade and announce he's opened the strait like everyone was asking for.
54
AnomalyNexus14 hr ago
+15
This definitely feels like a tweet first think later situation
15
lezaros15 hr ago
+9
Ship insurance companies can and will require ships to navigate through safe waters. They will charge a premium for ships attempting to navigate the strait of Hormuz. The companies that run these ships will pay the fee, but the cost of shipping will increase drastically.
There is no guarantee they will even get through so the shipments will have to be diverted through other routes. Either way the price of shipping will increase.
9
ITSA-GONGSHOW19 hr ago
+146
Naval blockades are an act of war. If he thinks he's gonna pirate oil headed for Asian allies, and other nations, it's not a good idea. In a lot of way I feel like he's trying to provoke a world war. If that's true, why? If that answer to that is to avoid the Epstein files, he truly is the worst leader potentially in history. Think about it, sending people into conflict to die to save yourself from the repercussions of your evil deeds. Truly disgusting.
146
Zeri-coaihnan16 hr ago
+27
Netanyahu is making it work for him. Same motivation; staying out of prison at any price. Damn the cost and consequence.
27
Historical_View135920 hr ago
+10696
Is that not an act of war?
10696
DentalATT20 hr ago
+8893
It is both an act of war and piracy.
8893
BananaProne20 hr ago
+2002
Trump trynna find the one piece
2002
oncemorewithpheline20 hr ago
+541
King Wapol irl
541
Brodimere20 hr ago
+258
Celestial Dragon, but somehow looks more innbred.
258
Kram_Hammer19 hr ago
+65
Guarding the Epstien Files like it's the meaning of D.
65
SneakyPanduh19 hr ago
+25
Ate that “don’t give a f*** fruit.”
25
QEDemon18 hr ago
+16
The dum-dum fruit
16
antmars20 hr ago
+54
We Are! We Are! At Hormuz! We Are!
54
Law-of-Poe20 hr ago
+634
Americans should never forgive republican voters for the destruction they’ve done to the standing of our country
634
Salford196919 hr ago
+124
And all the members of the Republican House and Senate members that allowed him to do it all unchecked
124
Thurak019 hr ago
+46
> allowed
Why the past tense? They are every single day actively allowing him to do the shit he does. Every single day they can impeach him again and remove him from office.
46
trahoots17 hr ago
+6
They used to allow him to do it. They still do, but they used to too.
6
datenschwanz19 hr ago
+16
It's a good thing Congress isn't alive to see this!
16
Au228820 hr ago
+170
It’s not only them to blame, they’re going to do what they do. It’s the non voters imo. They did nothing & now complain about everything with no remorse.
170
Skin4theWin20 hr ago
+90
Technically not piracy, that requires a private entity to take the ship. But 100% illegal and Cassus belli justification for that nation to go to war with the US or at least fire on ships that try to seize theirs
Edit: spelling
90
brickne319 hr ago
+6
I'm sure there are plenty of people lining up to be that private entity, he's just negotiating his cut.
6
RawrRawr8320 hr ago
+29
I guess he feels like he got away with blowing up all those Venezuelan boats
29
katalysis20 hr ago
+194
What is blowing up commercial ships for sailing an international waterway unless they pay a fee?
194
autoreaction20 hr ago
+186
The same. But If you decide to pay because your country depends on the oil, stopping them again is the same act. So the USA are on the level of Iran now. Great.
186
Karinka_LI20 hr ago
+110
We were the villain in this story as soon as it started.
If Trump says one thing and Iran another who would you believe?
110
autoreaction20 hr ago
+76
Nobody. There are no good actors in this war. It´s illegal and Iran has every right to defend itself. That doesnt make the regime any good though. Both countries are in their own way the bad guys and in the wrong. I believe nobody anything.
76
birgor20 hr ago
+13
Both are crimes against the Laws of the Sea. With international trade as the primary victim.
13
skip-all20 hr ago
+273
More like an act of insanity.
273
MassivelyCrew20 hr ago
+54
The Shart of the Deal.
54
mrboomx20 hr ago
+367
Assassinating their leadership is also an act of war.
367
Mypornnameis_20 hr ago
+261
But the vessels would be third party countries, right? Like if you detain a Chinese ship isn't that an act of war against China?
261
Purplepeal20 hr ago
+112
Whats to stop the crew ignoring the illegal US order? Would they be boarded and taken prisoner and US then steal the cargo?
Can't see the US attacking these ships so that seems the most likely outcome..
Would be very interesting if China's navy came along to e***** their own tankers through. Then what's Fantaface gonna do? He isnt gonna attack a Chinese warship. What an absolute prick.
112
Buckets-O-Yarr19 hr ago
+222
"He isnt gonna attack a Chinese warship."
You are far more certain about this than I am.
222
jordon4ca9319 hr ago
+75
"He isn't gonna attack a Chinese warship."
Is some insane level of foreshadowing. I'm gonna get the popcorn ready.
75
TheNosferatu19 hr ago
+23
It sounds a lot like an opinion I used to have; "There is no way Russia is *actually* gonna invade Ukraine, say what you will about Putin but he isn't *that* stupid."
23
Seanspeed19 hr ago
+20
I think top military officials(other than Hegseth) would press back VERY hard if Trump tried to make such an order.
20
man-vs-spider19 hr ago
+51
Top military officials that have been fired?
51
WafflePartyOrgy18 hr ago
+14
During a House hearing last week Hegseth was asked, "How many generals have you fired?" He responded, "I don't know the number." A member of Congress replied, "It's eight. Why did you fire them?" Hegseth: "At the pleasure of the president..."
>These actions are part of a broader, rapid restructuring of the military by Hegseth, targeting what he calls "woke" leadership and *aiming to reduce the number of high-ranking generals and admirals*
(who could press back at all when he makes such orders).
14
slartibartfast6419 hr ago
+20
Hasn't the US already taken an oil tanker that was headed from Venezuela to Cuba or something like that?
I could be wrong. It's hard to keep up and frankly I'm too disgusted to research it.
20
APieceofChees319 hr ago
+39
One hell of a difference between Venezuela and China though
39
slartibartfast6419 hr ago
+18
No argument there. Just noting that the "stealing other countries' ships" line has already been crossed, so it's not a question of whether the US would do such a thing.
Now it's just a question of which countries are untouchable and which aren't.
18
BAHatesToFly20 hr ago
+24
I think they mean in regards to countries that are not Iran.
24
AT-ST19 hr ago
+29
No shit, but Iran isn't the country we are talking about doing a war against right now. If the US Navy captures a Chinese ship, that is an act of war against China.
29
imnojezus20 hr ago
+53
What part of Trump’s history made you think that he would honor his own ceasefire?
53
SnooOpinions879020 hr ago
+116
It is an act of war against Iran.
[https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/san-remo-manual-1994](https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/san-remo-manual-1994)
Iran blockading the Straits of Hormuz under threat of violent attack is also - obviously - an act of war.
116
RevoDS20 hr ago
+85
Breaking news: acts of war happen during ~~war~~ special military operation
85
Vegetable-Hold918220 hr ago
+4388
Let see them stop Chinese, Russian and European tankers
4388
Poupulino20 hr ago
+2369
Russian and Chinese will pass, but he'll try to mess with the European ones since he doesn't respect Europe.
2369
Sometimes-funny20 hr ago
+766
Just Europe? Didn’t he threaten Canada, pinch the Venezuela president, currently f****** up the middle east etc etc. he doesn’t respect anyone, well maybe putin, remember the red carpet when he visited?
766
Math_3141619 hr ago
+205
yeah but these countries don't really use Hormuz as much as China or Europe.
205
maxstader19 hr ago
+61
Canada exports oil. Hormuz directly affects countries than need to import, indirectly Canada pays more since our oil is on the global market...but our oil isnt going through Hormuz
61
mvrander19 hr ago
+95
It's nothing to do with respect. Putin instructed him to destabilise the US/EU relations and he's doing exactly that
95
No_Notice_773719 hr ago
+54
Wait til Europe start selling US debt and taking their gold out of the US. Have you forgot the whole Greenland episode?
54
Krekie19 hr ago
+52
France already took last of it's gold like a week ago IIRC
52
physalisx18 hr ago
+40
US bonds continue collapsing in the aftermath of all this shit is one of the deciding nails in the coffin for the US economy.
It's actually kind of amazing. The fall of the US empire was almost guaranteed anyway, with or without Trump, but the way that he's speedrunning it through his unbelievable incompetence is quite impressive.
40
Vapour_Trails18 hr ago
+11
It is as the great Hari Seldon foretold.
11
Murky_Meaning212920 hr ago
+215
Don’t forget Indian, Pakistani, Malaysian ships too
Speedrunning 1 vs the world is an interesting strategy
215
QueefSeekingMissile20 hr ago
+36
Oh man can we teach trump to play civilization? Like let's see him try to actually win a wargame with his own brains. The crashout would be apocalyptic. Like metaphorically- instead of real apocalypse though.
36
joe5joe719 hr ago
+29
This game civ, many people say its a great game. I don't know. I'm not seeing it.
I had a great start, an incredible start, many people are saying the best start. Resources, I had the LUXURY resources, so many resources. So beautiful. And then these BARBARIANS, no one tells you about the barbarians, start attacking. Boom out of no where there's BARBARIANS attacking me and pillaging my beautiful resources. It's a total mess. No one knows how to stop these BARBARIANS.
Then china, CHINA denounces me because I'm winning so much, and they don't like winning. They don't like winning in china, only losers like this Wu character. They made up a whole character just to lose in a game. So sad. And they CHEATED to have such a big army. There's no way they have a bigger army on turn 50, my big beautiful army with 3 archers and 2 magnificent warriors. Really beautiful warriors.
"Advisors" keep telling me to build libraries, FAKE NEWS, I already have a library. It's huge, and has so many books. Many people say it's the most books. I've read all of them, really the best books. But they want me building more libraries. Really terrible advisors, worst I've seen.
And tbe deals, no one does deals like me in this game. But the AI doesn't understand deals, they just say no even though I can crush them with my HUGE army. 3 archers, how could they stop me? I'm not going to attack though. That wouldn't be nice. But I might, I might attack. They don't know. But they keep saying no to my deals, so bad so fake.
The game was made in MARYLAND. Very blue state, very unfair state, and you can tell its coded with TDS. Very biased coding. I have to be this no name president that didn't even exist when they could have put me in the game. Can you imagine that? How powerful America would be with Trump? But it would be too powerful it would break their game. I called Heather Firaxis and she said they couldn't do it it would be too powerful. But they should, and they will!
29
-Work_Account-19 hr ago
+8
He wouldn’t have the patience to get out the Ancient Era
8
xSaRgED20 hr ago
+36
It worked for me in Civ 5. Maybe that’s where these plans came from.
36
Ikuwayo20 hr ago
+62
This f****** idiot is starting fights with all these different countries, while simultaneously alienating all his allies
62
gakule19 hr ago
+30
If Trump and his fellow Republicans are trying to weaken the United States and remove them from power, they're doing a fantastic job.
Unfortunately, I think Trump is just the pied Piper of brainless idiots and they're all cheering him on.
30
According-Bet-14120 hr ago
+921
The russians would be able to pass,, of course. They're from Trump's boss.
921
Ohdake20 hr ago
+42
Yeah, this is the thing... This could escalate way beyond Iran very, very quickly. Wonder how the USA would act if there are armed soldiers aboard the tankers. Or if the tankers are escorted by naval vessels.
42
Excitium19 hr ago
+18
I don't think China is paying any toll to go through though.
So after telling his own allies to go and get the oil out of the strait themselves, he's now planning to detain their vessels for doing what he told them to do?
How utterly ridiculous...
18
Brilliant_Coffee_72120 hr ago
+3842
Ironic to see the US Navy, created to protect US commerce from pirates, actually become pirates.
3842
canopey20 hr ago
+1047
A captured pirate was brought before Alexander the Great. "How dare you molest the sea?" asked Alexander. "How dare you molest the whole world?" the pirate replied, and continued: "Because I do it with a little ship only, I am called a thief; you, doing it with a great navy, are called an emperor.
1047
theclownwithafrown19 hr ago
+335
Bob Dylan said in his song Sweetheart Like You from his 80s album Infidels "steal a little and they'll throw you in jail, steal a lot and they'll make you king"
335
apolloxer19 hr ago
+73
Kill one, you're a murderer. Kill ten, you're a monster. Kill a thousand, you're a hero.
73
Oceanbreeze87120 hr ago
+112
The US military only exists to manipulate the stock market nowadays.
112
MephistoHamProducts18 hr ago
+12
> The US military only exists to manipulate the stock market nowadays.
The Ghost of Smedley Butler would like to point out that none of this is new.
12
cacecil119 hr ago
+31
Look at me, I'm the pirate now
31
stonk_fish20 hr ago
+1064
Given this is in international waters, a military ship attacking or blockading a civilian vessel is literally piracy.
1064
SelfSufficientHub19 hr ago
+230
Trump is the boy who cried wolf if the boy was also the wolf
230
FluffyDoomPatrol18 hr ago
+55
And the wolf also raped other kids.
55
ParisGreenGretsch19 hr ago
+17
You're right. Also, my brain is eating itself.
17
mion8119 hr ago
+23
But *they* did it first /s
23
mistermeesh19 hr ago
+30
And this is why anyone who doesn't disobey Trump's illegal orders deserve whatever happens to them.
30
The_Frozen_Inferno20 hr ago
+382
New grift unlocked
382
leisurechef20 hr ago
+49
Markets will open & tank, then Taco!
49
CuriousTauri20 hr ago
+1151
I want out of this stupid timeline.
1151
[deleted]20 hr ago
+86
[removed]
86
JayRymer19 hr ago
+29
2 Phantom 2 Furious
29
LyptusConnoisseur19 hr ago
+118
Next check point is this November for some braking. And then November of 2028.
Americans wanted this timeline in 2024.
118
JuggernautMountain8620 hr ago
+247
Wait lemme get this straight…now the USA is doing what they wanted Iran to stop doing?
247
Slipsonic20 hr ago
+85
I guess it a contest of who can close the strait the hardest.
85
JuggernautMountain8619 hr ago
+33
“Nobody can close the strait like me”
-DJT
33
UUMD20 hr ago
+506
This f***** is just flailing.
And the world is paying for it.
506
LincolnHighwater20 hr ago
+123
In his first term he had people protecting him from his moronic impulses. Now... Not so much.
123
UUMD20 hr ago
+125
His first term he royally, epicly, comically effed up our COVID response. As a result, several hundred thousand Americans needlessly died.
And some Americans wanted more of that, and voted him back in.
Now, Trump has expanded his royal, epic, comic failure franchise to the globe.
Imagine how mad the rest of the world is. They had NOTHING to do right the fact that oil prices are rising and economies are suffering.
And it was All. So. Predictable.
125
Exciting-Emu-332419 hr ago
+58
The worst part of COVID was that COVID was the perfect scapegoat for his failures.
58
Sudden-Purchase-837117 hr ago
+8
All Trump had to do to COAST to victory in '20 was to listen the doctors and say "we're going to do what the experts say to do in a pandemic."
8
mk197119 hr ago
+386
He's trying to manipulate the markets. Hell but low tomorrow then reverse this statement the next day. There's a pattern forming here.
386
TrevorDangler19 hr ago
+113
Forming? Bruh he's been at this schtick since he took office. If people can't see the pattern, I question their eyesight, intelligence, or both.
113
Ok-Spirit-407418 hr ago
+51
Us will spend 1 billion dollars a day to stop Iran from making 20 million dollars a day. The economy wont get better but we are WINNING BIGLY
This is MAGA logic
We will gladly spend the 20 million we would get from fees to cost Americans 1 billion dollars per day as they lose their 4th Vietnam.
This is Iran logic
Dont get mad at me, you voted for this MAGA.
51
_bk_adv20 hr ago
+1020
Equal parts act of war AND piracy.
Republicans in Congress have no spine for allowing this to go on. He needs to be removed or the other option.
1020
4FriedChickens_Coke20 hr ago
+185
They support this
185
LumberjackJack20 hr ago
+76
As long as they aren't held accountable, they'll hold this position
76
Disc0Disc0Disc020 hr ago
+51
Republicans are making money off the insider info
51
Pierre-Gringoire20 hr ago
+41
No way he stops China-bound ships. TACO incoming.
41
Alleandros18 hr ago
+32
Hey kids! What time is it? That's right, it's Market Manipulation Monday!
32
cravingnoodles20 hr ago
+133
This is embarassing, and I'm not even american.
133
Snations20 hr ago
+78
Trust me, it’s painful on a molecular level.
78
steve_ample20 hr ago
+66
They must pay him instead. Through his shitcoin.
66
Wheels969020 hr ago
+43
Would he just f****** disappear already Jesus f****** christ
43
Odd_Dragonfly_183420 hr ago
+56
Tuesday he will give up again and won’t go through with it
56
MinimumBigman20 hr ago
+27
Just in time for 🌮Tuesday
27
Past_Key_105420 hr ago
+222
Yar that be piracy matey!
222
Karazhan20 hr ago
+81
Isn't that basically robbery? Someone paid for something, and America is just going to go take it from them??
Stop the planet, I want to get off.
81
Zlatan_Ibrahimovic18 hr ago
+9
Piracy is the word you're looking for.
9
Hey_HaveAGreatDay20 hr ago
+35
Jesus Christ. We were all worried he was going to bring us back to the 50s, mfer taking us all the way back to 1726 peak piracy
35
Hans_Delbruck19 hr ago
+15
Once again Congress, this is where you are supposed to step in
15
EmbarrassedCockRing18 hr ago
+16
There really wasn't even a concept of a plan beyond the initial bombing campaigns, was there...
Absolute pure cinema.
16
HistoryVibesCanJive19 hr ago
+16
The Strait of Hormuz has been functionally closed to commercial shipping since early March, not by formal declaration, but by Iranian attacks, threats, and now the selective permission of passage through an Iranian-controlled route in exchange for tolls paid to Tehran. A US blockade is not being announced into a neutral maritime environment. It is being layered on top of an existing Iranian interdiction regime, with inverted rules. Commercial vessels now face two navies with opposing orders: Iran will permit transit if the toll is paid, and Washington has announced it will seize any vessel in international waters that paid it. The merchant marine that the blockade is ostensibly designed to protect is being asked to choose which of two naval authorities to defy. That is not a freedom-of-navigation operation. It is a trap that the commercial operator is standing inside, with one exit priced by Tehran and the other criminalized by Washington.
The operational weakness of the announcement is that the math is already favoring compliance with Iran. Ship & Bunker reports that at current commodity prices, shipping companies are willing to pay the Iranian toll because the cost passes through to the buyer and the voyage completes. That means the population of "vessels that have paid a toll to Iran" is not a small set of bad actors available for clean interdiction. It is potentially the majority of commercial traffic through a chokepoint that handles roughly a fifth of the world's seaborne oil, including cargo bound for Japan, South Korea, India, and European refiners. An interdiction regime at that scale is not enforceable. It collapses on the first Chinese-flagged tanker that refuses to be boarded, on the first allied government that declines to honor the seizure of cargo it has purchased, or on the first shipment Washington has to wave through to avoid a diplomatic rupture with a treaty ally. The announcement assumes the commercial world will comply. The commercial world has already shown, by paying Iran, that it follows whichever authority the math favors. The math does not currently favor Washington.
TL;DR: Washington announced a blockade that only works if Beijing, New Delhi, Tokyo, and Seoul pretend it does.
16
Bored_pats_fan18 hr ago
+11
There is no way China is going to be "chill" about us detaining or worse preventing them from getting their oil. Think about what China can do to our economy if they decided to dump U. S. treasuries. What a shitshow.
11
stevenriley118 hr ago
+12
Other nations are going to see that as piracy on the high seas. It’s one thing if he does it to some small little country who can’t fight back, but it sounds like he plans on stopping ships from major countries. Countries have gone to war for a lot less than this.
12
Nate50641118 hr ago
+27
So piracy. This f****** moron is openly ordering piracy in International waters. Congress, this is the whole f****** point of your existence, do your job.
27
CakeTown20 hr ago
+40
Here’s more of those illegal orders we’ve all been warning about
40
StarsofSobek18 hr ago
+9
Whatever happened to the duty to deny illegal orders?
9
ANTILAMER1320 hr ago
+32
Did you pay them ?
No!
Ok, you can go.
32
TheGreatStories19 hr ago
+9
The response to "no," will be the US demanding a toll for "safe passage".
9
Goat_inna_Tree19 hr ago
+7
Did you pay them?
No!
OK, pay ME, then you can go.
7
VexedCanadian8420 hr ago
+27
He's mad Iran told him no when he asked for a cut of the tolls.
This is how he negotiates. He bluffs. He threatens. And he folds
27
BritishBoy8819 hr ago
+18
Everyone needs to start sanctioning USA
18
Efficient_Sky517318 hr ago
+9
The clown wasn’t satisfied with the attention of 350 million Americans, he needs all 8 billion. All because his father never praised him.
Someone convince him to do therapy, before he sets the world on fire.
9
Boys4Ever20 hr ago
+44
Good thing we didn't elect Harris. She was destined for WW3 /s
44
WaterFantastic239419 hr ago
+8
I seriously doubt he is going to detain Chinese and Russian ships. But let’s watch the show
8
Intelligent_Kick_43619 hr ago
+8
Some context regarding UN and US laws now broken by the U.S:
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS): [https://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention\_agreements/texts/unclos/part7.htm](https://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/part7.htm)
Article 87: 1. The high seas are open to all States, whether coastal or land-locked. Freedom of the high seas is exercised under the conditions laid down by this Convention and by other rules of international law. It comprises, *inter alia*, both for coastal and land-locked States: (a) freedom of navigation;
*Article 88: Reservation of the high seas for peaceful purposes* \- The high seas shall be reserved for peaceful purposes.
*Article 89: Invalidity of claims of sovereignty over the high seas* \- No State may validly purport to subject any part of the high seas to its sovereignty.
[https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF12578](https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF12578) " U.S. law concerning domestic maritime issues and law of the sea **parallel** many UNCLOS provisions **concerning state control and regulation** of territorially adjacent waters, **navigation through and use of the high seas**"
8
Ancient_Influence38919 hr ago
+8
I don't see China allowing their ships to be detained by the United States.
8
Isoturius19 hr ago
+8
This f***** is going to cause WW3
8
thesword6218 hr ago
+8
Or what? Is the USA going to fire on commercial vessels??
8
ass_grass_or_ham17 hr ago
+7
We’re just the assholes of the world now. We have to impeach, remove, indict and convict him if we want to build back any of our international relationships.
7
cyberianscribe20 hr ago
+35
This reminds me: Back in 1941 America imposed an embargo on oil and gasoline exports to Japan…A few months later - Japan attacked Pearl Harbour.
35
IamAbridgeTroll19 hr ago
+7
TACO Monday coming
7
Rays_Boom_Boom_Room119 hr ago
+6
I’m sorry. The president is simply a fool
6
Haizenburg118 hr ago
+7
This MF thinks he can do a shake down, in an area that he has no control over? 🫡
7
MadmanMarkMiller18 hr ago
+8
Sooo piracy. That's just straightup piracy.
8
ZealousidealBear9318 hr ago
+8
Couldn’t open it, so make it closeder?
8
gordonjames6214 hr ago
+6
A quick question
If USA blocks shipping in International waters, is that considered piracy?
6
FelixtheFarmer14 hr ago
+8
Can't wait to see him trying to interdict a Chinese ship with a People's Liberation Army Navy e*****, what could possibly go wrong ?
200 Comments