ListNook

Rgv20 Apr 23, 2026 +272

A few ‘Spare’ weapons maybe?

272

Captain_Leemu Apr 23, 2026 +66

Harry is already in ukraine

66

Crypt0Nihilist Apr 23, 2026 +30

He said weapons, not tools.

30

Araminal Apr 23, 2026 +29

I don't think that the US has much spare after all of the stuff they dumped on Iran, and the anti-missile/drone missiles expended in different middle east countries (mostly Israel). They're going to be restocking for years.

29

herewegoagain1920 Apr 23, 2026 +22

That was always a big selling point. American weapon manufacturers making even more money. Fully funded by our taxes.

22

Rgv20 Apr 23, 2026 +29

I don’t think anyone got my bad joke. I was referencing his book titled Spare.😄

29

Thoroughaway008 Apr 23, 2026 +9

I got it and chuckled 🤭

9

Rgv20 Apr 23, 2026 +3

Awesome!!! That makes me happy!😊

3

Araminal Apr 23, 2026 +2

Ah, that makes sense why you capitalised "Spare"!

2

MrDabb Apr 23, 2026 +1

Are stockpile numbers public?

1

Araminal Apr 23, 2026 +6

I wouldn't have thought so. That would be a security issue, but I suppose that there could be educated guesses made by some experts and intelligence services based on other information.

6

MrDabb Apr 23, 2026 +4

The US Military is known to understate capabilities. Take the B2 bomber for example, for years it was known it had a max payload capacity of 40k pounds until it went and carried two 30k pound bombs to bomb Iran. I wouldn't trust any figure put out or estimated.

4

dragnansdragon Apr 23, 2026 +3

Still blows my mind that within 100 years, we went from being able to barely sustain the weight of a single man in Kitty Hawk, to the engineering fetes we have today that can carry literal tons.

3

The_Parsee_Man Apr 23, 2026 +1

Seems like US still has some: https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-war-us-weapons-prince-harry-f02a45281ba095d35cf5a198710be8e3

1

stormelemental13 Apr 24, 2026 +1

> I don't think that the US has much spare after all of the stuff they dumped on Iran We will have hundreds of tanks in storage. Not reserve. Storage. And at lot of other vehicles as well that we're unlikely to ever use. Those and the ammunition for them could all go to ukraine.

1

Araminal Apr 24, 2026 +1

Google says over 3,000 Abrams in long term storage, as well as multi-thousand other vehicles.

1

Rare_Eye_1165 Apr 23, 2026 +8

Maybe the prince who isn't a prince can give some of his own fortune.

8

GuaSukaStarfruit Apr 23, 2026 +2

Few? Nahhh give way more

2

Gomnanas Apr 23, 2026 +270

I thought he gave up his royal titles?

270

GaryJM Apr 23, 2026 +199

He stepped down from being a "working royal" in 2020, meaning he would no longer perform official functions on behalf of the monarch. He also announced he would becomd financially independent from the royal family. He and his wife kept their HRH styles but don't use them. He's still a prince and a duke.

199

Whitewind617 Apr 23, 2026 +62

Not sure if people know this but the crown is not easily walked away from, it either takes an act of parliament, or you need to do something that gets you removed automatically (leaving the church of England, marrying someone without consent of the reigning monarch, etc.) EDIT: This apparently has nothing to do with the title of "Prince," which I did not realize.

62

juleskikicobb Apr 23, 2026 +41

He didn’t walk away from the ‘crown’ because he would never be king (absent a wipeout of his brother’s family). It is open to him to never use any prince or duke titles. He chooses to use them.

41

Circle_Breaker Apr 23, 2026 +11

I think he's saying that he's still in line for the crown despite giving up his titles.

11

phluidity Apr 23, 2026 +12

See "The pedophile formerly known as Prince ~~Albert~~Andrew".

12

PorkchopFunny Apr 23, 2026 +7

Andrew

7

phluidity Apr 23, 2026 +4

D'oh

4

LongJohnSelenium Apr 23, 2026 +3

Literally you can just no call no show

3

maverickhawk99 Apr 23, 2026 +2

Not necessarily. Didn’t Charles strip his brother of his titles? I.e he’s no longer known as Prince Andrew. Didn’t require an act of parliament.

2

DanS1993 Apr 23, 2026 +13

Yeah titles are within the gift of the monarch and as such can be stripped by them. Hence why Andrew was stripped of his dukedom and prince title. The line of succession is governed by actual laws and so would require an act of parliament hence why Andrew is still in line for the throne.

13

Initial-Lead-2814 Apr 23, 2026 +5

not sure if people understand were not all British or have to care about royalty

5

Jealous_Response_492 Apr 23, 2026 +58

Most of us Brits don't care. But if Harry can use his absurdly extreme privileged position to highlight and champion worthy causes, fair play to him.

58

3050_mjondalen Apr 23, 2026 +4

Atleast he seems to have some brain function compared to our Märtha louise lol

4

Funny-Salamander4691 Apr 23, 2026 +4

Well, no one asked you to comment on a story which features a British ex-Royal, but you did. Why not just scroll on by?

4

Initial-Lead-2814 Apr 23, 2026 +1

It involves him talking about my country

1

Flangepacket Apr 23, 2026 +2

I guarantee the oppressed people of Ukraine care rn, even if they didn’t before.

2

mattfromjoisey Apr 23, 2026 +1

Being a pedophile seemed to work for Andrew

1

Halgy Apr 23, 2026 +11

"This isn't even my job anymore, but *come on* Amercia"

11

ahhwhoosh Apr 23, 2026 +8

He’s Harry from Harry and Meghan now

8

lady_faust Apr 23, 2026 +4

Harry and the Meghansons

4

mofa90277 Apr 23, 2026 +11

He’s doing the same activities as Angelina Jolie, Shirley Temple Black, and Sean Penn: using his celebrity to keep attention focused on important causes.

11

[deleted] Apr 23, 2026 +2

[deleted]

2

savingrain Apr 23, 2026 +11

No he did not. You are mistaken. He only put his royal highness in abeyance and agreed not to use that. He is still Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex

11

GaryJM Apr 23, 2026 +7

Harry is absolutely still a prince. Are you maybe thinking of the king's brother Andrew?

7

ptapobane Apr 23, 2026 +27

>"This is a moment for American leadership, a moment for America to show that it can honor its international treaty obligations, not out of charity but out of its own enduring role in global security and strategic stability." has he been living under a rock?

27

Aggressive-Dealer-21 Apr 23, 2026 +15

Been too busy enjoying all that royal entitlement without fulfilling any royal obligations.

15

Mogwai_11 Apr 23, 2026 +84

WE WANT PRIVACY!

84

Dr_MantisTobaggin_MD Apr 23, 2026 +5

Read my mind.

5

DamnOdd Apr 23, 2026 +11

While I agree, have you not seen our cult leader?

11

totallyRebb Apr 23, 2026 +78

Is this comment section full of Russian bots or something ? The takes look very familiar.

78

Ok-Peanut3752 Apr 24, 2026 +16

No, it’s just a lot of mentally ill Royalists that are angry with Harry for leaving the royal family because he didn’t like how they were treating his wife or the British press and has decided to move to the US and raise his children there. Just a lot of people feeling rejected on behalf of Royals that don’t really do anything for them but they feel obligated to be outraged on their behalf nonetheless.

16

Kagerae Apr 24, 2026 -3

No it's just the hypocrisy of them both. "We want privacy" but then smiling for the cameras while pretending to be holier than thou, meghans got a massive victim complex, considering they wanted privacy they sure love posing at every given opportunity.

-3

Ok-Peanut3752 Apr 24, 2026 +11

They wanted to decide what they share with the public regarding their kids, totally reasonable and many on you know this but ignore the nuance because it doesn’t fit your agenda. They now have the ability to share parts of their lives that they feel comfortable with and still protect their children. They moved to America six years ago, don’t you think it’s time that some of you get over it and move on? Seriously, Meghan hasn’t even mentioned any member of the royal family by name publicly in five years and you’re all still mad.

11

throwawayyyywego2024 Apr 24, 2026 +7

They've never gotten over him marrying a black. And a black American of all things. Tbh it's so much toned down from a few years ago cause I've heard some awful stuff. Ghetto, gold digger, "gonna move her family to his house" type shit. Every other week people were saying he would leave her or that he would find out she wasn't really pregnant and divorce her etc etc..it was crazy

7

GuaSukaStarfruit Apr 23, 2026 +16

Yeah brigaded

16

every-day_throw-away Apr 23, 2026 +88

While I agree with the message you are not the guy Harry.

88

savingrain Apr 23, 2026 +22

The main issue I see with this is it just comes off as whining from the uninformed. He’s not wrong in this instance but he also doesn’t represent any government or have any political power so it comes off as whining or trying to use his titles to influence government. You can look at it in this case and say it’s fine because I agree with him- but what about a case where one does not agree? He’s not an expert in this field. He has no authority. He’s a private citizen.

22

snushomie Apr 23, 2026 +37

Trump has a weird obsession with the royal family, every time that King Charles gives him attention he 180s his opinion on the UK/EU/Ukraine, like how recently he was talking about how NATO allies did nothing in Afghanistan etc and then after receiving a correspondence from Charles immediately posted how the UK soldiers were brave etc, it's honestly just a clever use of soft power for the UK since there are very few people Trump's ego will allow him to listen to even if you have a different opinion on any of them.

37

Joyceecos Apr 23, 2026 +13

He got it from his mother, she was British and was a fan of the royal family

13

sopheroo Apr 23, 2026 +64

Harry actually served and went to Afghanistan twice, so I don't really see why he's not the guy.

64

Kreos642 Apr 23, 2026 +52

While he obviously has credit and experience to back him up, no regular person in the US, who is likely living a life with financial struggles, wants to hear it from a man born with a silver spoon whose biggest drama is moving out from his parents house because they dont like his wife.

52

so-much-wow Apr 23, 2026 +90

But most of them would prefer to hear it from a perpetual draft dodging, pedophile whose responsible for their financial struggles? Guess that says enough about the american people.

90

CoffeeStrength Apr 23, 2026 +9

*also born with a silver spoon in his mouth

9

Araminal Apr 23, 2026 +13

I up-voted this remark, and then down-voted it just so that I could up-vote it twice.

13

GuyWithPants Apr 23, 2026 +15

He's not saying it to convince regular persons in the US. He's saying it to convince the silver-spoon men actually running the place.

15

adamgerd Apr 23, 2026 +3

I mean half of them seem to want to hear it from Trump, hardly someone who’s less privileged financially

3

Xsiah Apr 23, 2026 +5

So why did they elect Trump as president?

5

Remarkable-Meal-223 Apr 23, 2026 +1

If you think about it he's somewhat of a Pat Tillman-esque story though not exactly. He could have lived a life of luxury and nobody would have questioned him but he chose to fly in combat on a attack helicopter in Afghanistan. I think you have to give him some sort of respect for that choice at least. I know the brits probably don't care (they're probably more upset with him breaking tradition) but as an American thats pretty impressive (he chose his own path). More impressive than being "royalty" (a thing you're just born to and requiring no choice or action of your own).

1

rabbitholeseverywher Apr 24, 2026 +3

Serving in the armed forces is a long-standing tradition in the royal family and in no way "choosing their own path". It's literally expected of them, and Harry's father, brother, uncle and aunt and grandmother (Queen Elizabeth) all did so. Also fwiw Pat Tillman's mother criticized Harry over an award he was given in Pat's name, calling for it to be given to someone more worthy. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/pat-tillman-award-prince-harry-espys-mom-reacts-rcna159715 Nothing against Harry personally, just not at all into royals getting their asses kissed for shit civilians do every single day. He also chose not to make a monetary donation to Ukraine, which would have helped a lot more than his words.

3

Noughmad Apr 24, 2026 +1

> no regular person in the US, who is likely living a life with financial struggles, wants to hear it from a man born with a silver spoon Apparently, more than half of the voters do.

1

Thee-Cat Apr 23, 2026 +8

It's just bad optics at this point. Hate to use this comparison, but it's honestly reminds me of when Kim Kardashian does some charity or says something genuinely right. It IS a good thing. But...I mean...It's Kim Kardashian. We can appreciate that she brings some eyeballs to the situation. But she invokes so much more negativity from people than good, you'd almost prefer her to not say anything at all. Faaaaar majority of people in UK don't want him doing these faux royal tours and faux royal statements. And the people in the US still don't even understand if he's a prince? Or just some spoiled rich kid using daddy's money to travel the world acting like a prince? Does his voice hold literally any more 'authority' than me or you? If it IS just the 'celebrity' angle and bringing attention to an issue. Okay, great. But like I said, while he and Kim Kardashian can doing great work. And think most people just wish they'd leave it to more well respected voices who could actually rally virtually anyone to the cause.

8

every-day_throw-away Apr 23, 2026 +2

I served and deployed 4 times, I am also not the guy. It's not his service he is just not in the position to offer advice.

2

Sea_Error_5704 Apr 23, 2026 +5

lol "went to Afghanistan" You mean got babysat while playing video games and never saw a day of real danger? No, I don't give him any credit, and I don't want him speaking for me.

5

Natural_Plane_657 Apr 24, 2026 +2

For a total of 2-3 months in total and protected by body guards.

2

Thee-Cat Apr 23, 2026 +1

This is well said. It honestly feels akin to when "Kim Kardashian" will spearhead some charity or bring attention to some very real issue. It's genuinely good work we can all agree with. But...it's still Kim Kardashian. She brings such baggage, and invokes so much more negativity than positivity. That is almost seems better off her not saying anything, and just leaving it to someone with any actual authority, or at bare minimum, some at least marginally well-like celebrity that could actually steer public opinion.

1

InterestingPop9664 Apr 23, 2026 +16

Maybe he could donate all his money to Ukraine?

16

Thee-Cat Apr 23, 2026 +11

Thes faux royal tours to Australia aren't c****, y'know. lol

11

rabbitholeseverywher Apr 24, 2026 +2

Or even some. There was no monetary donation at all.

2

-wearetheworld- Apr 24, 2026 +3

prince?

3

myloxyloto1987 Apr 23, 2026 +21

Is he still in his world wide privacy tour.

21

autobannedforsatire Apr 23, 2026 +57

The US doesn’t have a prince. Maybe he should call home.

57

Gentle_Snail Apr 23, 2026 +59

The UK has been one of the most consistent and strongest backers of Ukraine, he doesn’t need to implore them.

59

Araminal Apr 23, 2026 +25

It has a wannabe king though.

25

SP1570 Apr 23, 2026 +6

Almost an Emperor, Palpatine style...

6

Idiot_Savant_13 Apr 23, 2026 +9

I'm fairly confident that Ukraine isn't going to trust the U.S. until & unless there is signficant regime change. The U.S. is unreliable, untrustworthy, and this administration has sent 5 envoys to Moscow while sending precisely zero to Kyiv. I doubt very much there's room for this relationship to be repaired until & unless those who tried to force Ukraine to yield to Russia's attack are no longer in power or able to influence Ukraine's future. Just my guess, tho.

9

BrigadierKirk Apr 24, 2026 +1

I mean ukriane doesn't need to trust america and america doesnt need to trust ukriane tho? Like is there any benifits to either party, all ukriane needs is america to give weapons to ukriane

1

Idiot_Savant_13 Apr 24, 2026 +1

Ever tried to schedule something with a flake? If someone can't be trusted, even a simple transfer of weapons raises a fuckton of obvious questions: • are these the right weapons? • are they all there? • are they functional? • are they in good repair? • is all the ammo with them? • is the ammo in good condition? • is this meeting secure? • how can we be sure this meeting remains secure? • are there trackers in the weapons? • is the software in the weapons sabotaged? • are only *some* of the weapons sabotaged? ...and this is just off the top of my head. Intel & Counter-intel people spend time coming up with methods that have to pass a much higher filter. So, yeah - lying really is the dumbest thing a person can do, cuz it complicates every single deal around them. Iran's kicking a lot of diplomatic butt right now just by not lying... & that stark contrast with the U.S. is stunning other nations awake.

1

Araminal Apr 23, 2026 +16

Putin's asset in the whitehouse isn't going to do shit.

16

Sufficient_Steak_839 Apr 23, 2026 +15

What happened to this guy wanting privacy?

15

rcanhestro Apr 23, 2026 +3

privacy is not wanting journalists going after him everytime he takes a walk. if he chooses to be on the "spotlight" out of his own accord, that seems fair.

3

Thee-Cat Apr 23, 2026 +7

Nah, he's just not used to being outside the protection of the royal family(who even themselves are not immune to sensational headlines). If bro and his wife are apparently going about this as normal non-royals, living in mansions in the heart of LA surrounded by celebrities, partying at Kardashian birthday parties, going to big Netflix get-togethers, etc, etc. In what universe would they be the ONE couple in celebrity history to be immune to paparazzi, rumors, or sensational headlines?

7

Difficult-Break-8282 Apr 23, 2026 -5

he plus elton john and others won the wire tapping ' journalist' lawsuit . privacy is choosing what to say and keep private vs some scum stalking you to make money off headlines

-5

Intothebreach45 Apr 23, 2026 +7

Believe the case is now in the hands of the judge. A verdict will be announced at a future date.

7

BusyView6617 Apr 23, 2026 +2

Trump is looking for the UK and the Europeon Union to come to his rescue. They should remind him that Russia's trying to kick in their back door, and their time and weapons need to be focused in Ukraine. Maybe if Trump was able to understand Putin invaded Ukraine, and had interviened there years ago, the rest of the world would be in a position to help him out

2

Qwawn72 Apr 23, 2026 +8

Why does anyone care what this guy says?

8

Thee-Cat Apr 23, 2026 +10

That's the problem, they don't. In fact he invokes infinitely more negativity than positivity at this point, even if what he's saying is correct. And would do better letting people who are even marginally respected or liked in the public sphere, to be doing this sort of stuff.

10

No_Football_9232 Apr 23, 2026 +5

Sorry Harry, that ship has sailed. The USA is in the side of ruzzia.

5

OriginalGoldstandard Apr 23, 2026 +3

You are not a wizard Harry. Stay out of it

3

HellBlazer_NQ Apr 23, 2026 +6

That's not going to go down well in America. They only have one King. /s

6

Fredly_ Apr 23, 2026 +4

There is only one former royal that Trump might listen to and Harry isn't him.

4

Creative-Lynx-1561 Apr 23, 2026 +7

Not american or british, but I though monarchy can't be political

7

whichwitch9 Apr 23, 2026 +7

He maybe a prince, but he's not a working royal on the UK side. On the North American side, he's a resident of the US, married to a US citizen, and a father of US citizens. Despite what the current US government would like to say, any person, born to a royal family or not, is allowed to speak to and criticize the US government. It is his and everyone else's right in accordance to our laws and traditions. He simply has a bigger platform than most. He's talking to the US government. He is good on that front, though Im sure talking heads in DC will imply otherwise because they're a bunch of thin skinned bastards

7

Combat_Orca Apr 23, 2026 +5

He’s not monarchy anymore

5

hiddenwalls Apr 23, 2026 +3

National politics, no (with exceptions), being involved in geopolitics is basically their job. Although less so with Harry as he resignedthat job but kept the title.

3

rcanhestro Apr 23, 2026 +1

they aren't "political" in domestic issues, but foreign matters is something different. the royals are basically glorified diplomats.

1

explorerazure Apr 23, 2026 +1

The reigning monarch yes, the rest of them... meh

1

Substantial_Milk8170 Apr 23, 2026 +9

I’m pretty sure we fought a whole war in 1776 specifically so we wouldn’t have to take tax spending advice from British royalty.

9

ShoulderPast2433 Apr 23, 2026 +13

No. That was a war for independence.

13

siorge Apr 23, 2026 +36

I'm also pretty sure the people who died fighting this war would lose their minds if they saw what Trump is doing to their country

36

Canada1971 Apr 23, 2026 +27

Not to mention the people that died in WWII to restore democracy in Europe

27

siorge Apr 23, 2026 +12

We live in strange time. There is a famous French jewish man called Serge Klarsfeld. He spent his life chasing nazis to bring them to justice. He is now supporting the French far-right party (RN) because he believes the left is antisemitic. The RN was founded by waffen SS, the very men he spent his life chasing... Post-truth world

12

Madbrad200 Apr 23, 2026 +2

Wars aren't waged for moralistic reasons. Nazi Germany was thought because Nazi Germany was an existential threat to pretty much everyone in the region. Had nothing to do with democracy

2

Alive_Ad_3199 Apr 24, 2026 +3

If so, then why has the King been invited to address the US Congress next week?

3

explorerazure Apr 23, 2026 +2

Was actually parliament not the monarchy

2

Kagerae Apr 23, 2026 +3

For someone who wanted to stop being in the news he sure loves being in the news.

3

no_cojones1978 Apr 23, 2026 +4

I implore Harry to be less in the media.

4

PortiaPotty2 Apr 23, 2026 +4

Sorry Harry. The US 🇺🇸 doesn't take advice from a buffoon 🤡 such as yourself.

4

Oknocando Apr 23, 2026 +5

Harry can go f*** himself. Grifter

5

Thee-Cat Apr 23, 2026 +9

Yeah, he has so much baggage and invokes so much more negativity than positive. That it almost feels like, even when he might say something good or right, you just wanna say, Nah bro, please just go home, spend your daddy's money, let ANYONE with any modicum of authority or even favor with the general public, do this.

9

Halftied Apr 23, 2026 +4

He was royalty in the UK. He had no more voice in the US than Joe down the street. A lot of people are saying the same thing he said but they don't get heard. I mean he doesn't even rate up there with Sean Penn.

4

LukasJackson67 Apr 23, 2026 +3

Nobody cares what you think Harry

3

MisterBlisterKisser Apr 23, 2026 +5

Ugh. He and his b**** of a wife need to just go the hell away and stay out of world affairs. Let the actual royals speak on the world stage.

5

cig-nature Apr 23, 2026 +2

> "The United States has a singular role in this story not only because of its power but because when Ukraine gave up nuclear weapons, America was part of the assurance that Ukraine's sovereignty and borders would be respected," he said. "This is a moment for American leadership, a moment for America to show that it can honor its international treaty obligations, not out of charity but out of its own enduring role in global security and strategic stability." I don't disagree with this. But I'm confused why he left America to talk to Americans.

2

RTPdude Apr 23, 2026 -1

why doesn't he ask the UK to do more?

-1

siorge Apr 23, 2026 +25

because the UK is one of Ukraine's strongest ally while the US proudly brags that abandoning Ukraine is their greatest recent foreign policy achievement...

25

jack5624 Apr 23, 2026 +13

Well the UK is the only signatory of the Budapest memorandum who didn’t then proceed to break it.

13

Gentle_Snail Apr 23, 2026 +23

The UK is consistently one of Ukraine’s strongest backers, while the US keeps threatening to pull support.

23

HoneybucketDJ Apr 23, 2026 +8

US support to Ukraine - 115 billion UK support to Ukraine - ~~15 billion~~ 20 billion

8

Gentle_Snail Apr 23, 2026 +12

The UK has provided £20 billion. America has provider 0.58% of GDP, Britain has provided 0.76% of GDP. https://www.kielinstitut.de/topics/war-against-ukraine/ukraine-support-tracker/

12

HerMajestyTheQueef1 Apr 23, 2026 +12

He has and does though UK is already one of the greatest supporters of Ukraine, they don't need to be told as much in this regard, whereas US under trump regime is appears to be more helpful to putin.

12

RecommendationOwn300 Apr 24, 2026 +3

Mr Mischief what are you doing in Ukraine and giving ridiculous speeches

3

Tatertothotspot Apr 23, 2026 +2

Isn’t he a millionaire? You send money !!! If he is so dedicated, sell your house and send money to the cause !!

2

Madbrad200 Apr 23, 2026 +6

Harry [does donate](https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/prince-harry-donates-500000-help-wounded-children-ukraine-gaza-2025-09-10/) to Ukraine and like the rest of us, he pays taxes and like the rest of us, is entitled to voice on what those taxes should be spent on. Millions aren't enough to win a war

6

AdTop9663 Apr 23, 2026 +4

60 million dollars net worth !!!! Actions speak louder than words

4

Thee-Cat Apr 23, 2026 +1

Well he wanted to....but....but.....he and the wifey had to focus on the new faux royal tour in Australia. Being a fake royal is quite expensive these days, you know. lol

1

Starlifter4 Apr 23, 2026 +1

Prince of what?

1

DavidlikesPeace Apr 23, 2026 +3

That ship has sailed sir. Europe must help itself and Ukraine. They must abandon dependency on America We all have to face hard truths. America is likely facing a civil war or democratic breakdown into tyranny. Their elites are enmeshed in their selfish own butts, as well as a major land war in Asia. They won't help anybody in Europe. Stop counting on a cruel president to perform a selfless act.

3

RemoteClub631 Apr 23, 2026 +4

Stop cryin karen, Europe has all these immigrants flowing in , it can build a powerful army that will be led by macron Ursula and dirty sanchez

4

AWinterPeople Apr 23, 2026 +3

How many trips away from his kids does this make now in the last few months?

3

Madbrad200 Apr 23, 2026 +2

Believe it or not plenty of people in the real world travel regularly for work.

2

AWinterPeople Apr 23, 2026 +5

Yes I was one of them but HE doesn’t travel for WORK…

5

Madbrad200 Apr 23, 2026 +1

How many days did you spend away from your kids?

1

yahoonews Apr 23, 2026

[CBS reports](https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/prince-harry-implores-u-more-111048257.html?ncid=listnooknewsus) \- Prince Harry, the younger son of Britain's King Charles, made an unannounced visit to Ukraine on Thursday to show his support for the country, which he said is "bravely and successfully defending Europe's eastern flank." During an address at the Kyiv Security Forum on Thursday morning, Harry contrasted European support for Ukraine with the United States. "The United States has a singular role in this story not only because of its power but because when Ukraine gave up nuclear weapons, America was part of the assurance that Ukraine's sovereignty and borders would be respected," he said. "This is a moment for American leadership, a moment for America to show that it can honor its international treaty obligations, not out of charity but out of its own enduring role in global security and strategic stability."

0

Optimal_Anxiety6864 Apr 23, 2026 +1

Yahoo news has a Listnook account

1

All_Hail_Hynotoad Apr 23, 2026 +1

Has he not been paying attention? This administration does not care about Ukraine.

1

Few_Occasion458 Apr 23, 2026 +1

Harry, I think we agree. We just have this one old, fat, corrupt problem.

1

Significant_Tree8407 Apr 23, 2026 +1

No money for Trump in Ukraine.

1

Skyisonfire Apr 23, 2026 +1

Would love to but my tax dollars are going towards genocide.

1

purplewhiteblack Apr 24, 2026 +1

Why is Putin so much better at poisoning his enemies than the reverse?

1

chase-michael Apr 24, 2026 +1

What does he tell the UK?

1

starsqream Apr 25, 2026 +1

Lol, Meghan told him

1

catplayermeow Apr 24, 2026 +1

Sadly under this administration, Ukraine will not receive any help at all. In fact, it looks like Russia benefited more than Ukraine as they are allowed to sell oil more freely ever since the Iran War. While the majority of American support Ukraine and want them to win, other countries are going to help them survive because due to politics they probably will not see any assistance for a while.

1

mrstims Apr 23, 2026 -1

Get outta here Harry. Go home. You are just a celebrity who thinks we should listen to him.

-1

hookahsmokingladybug Apr 23, 2026 +2

Stfu Harry; you aren't even a citizen here. Just keep grifting....as ever

2

FishInferno Apr 23, 2026 +1

He didn’t say it, he *implored* it.

1

retro_underpants Apr 23, 2026 +2

Why are they not speaking on all the things that are happening in the US where they live and their children are growing up? They wanted to leave the Royal Family so they could be a force for change and use their voices. The only use they’ve been put to is chatting with Netflix.

2

Jazz-Again Apr 23, 2026 +1

Ehhh… how about asking your own country to do more, rich boy.

1

Educational-Bus-7827 Apr 24, 2026 +1

Get your daddy to pay like he does your bills wanker

1

flubluflu2 Apr 23, 2026 +1

I really don't know why he left the Royal family if he wants to keep making statements like this, I'm sure he regrets it a lot, his words would have carried more weight had he stayed within the family circle and could have been an influence and force for good in that role. One of the strangest decisions.

1

Thee-Cat Apr 23, 2026 +4

I think a part of it has to do with how desire to power is never satisfied. And even being "second best", "second in line to the throne", etc, is not enough. Even a dude and his wife who were destined to live a lifetime of luxury, be beloved by millions and a celebrity everywhere you go just for being born into the right family, and even be able to speak(to issues like this) with an almost inherent authority. Still gave it all up, because he was, in his own words, "the spare" in the family. Coming from one of the richest, luckiest, and privileged persons in modern history, is what made most of us normal folk go, WTH is this guy on about?

4

SuUU2564 Apr 23, 2026

Kiss of death, FFS he is a terrible messenger. This is the sort of thing that will turn everyday Americans off support. His name is a tainted.

0

niceufo777 Apr 23, 2026 -1

hahaha, you have no power here.

-1

OutsideJack-1999 Apr 23, 2026 -2

While I agree, this doesn’t need to come from him.

-2

Krazilia-Love Apr 23, 2026

Can someone implore that the US do more for its actual citizens who pay for all the work that is done in other countries?

0

Madbrad200 Apr 23, 2026 +2

You'd be paying significantly more if Russia was allowed to succeed and proceeds with waging war across Europe.

2

gumby_twain Apr 23, 2026 -3

Why doesn’t the prince do more? I head his family is pretty wealthy and influential. Useless git

-3

Mysterious-Prompt212 Apr 23, 2026 -1

He does realize that Tramp is a kompromot?

-1

Aretirednurse81 Apr 23, 2026 -1

I thought he was not doing royal duties anymore?

-1

FeeWeak1138 Apr 23, 2026 -2

Donald, time to send this uneducated fool packing back to England.

-2

lizardan Apr 23, 2026 -4

What about f****** Europe doing anything about it

-4

rcanhestro Apr 23, 2026 +2

the Europe that has constanly been helping Ukraine and just today approved a 90 billion "loan" to them?

2

Madbrad200 Apr 23, 2026 +1

Europe literally just approved a 90 billion loan

1

lizardan Apr 23, 2026 +2

Pennies

2

Madbrad200 Apr 23, 2026 +1

It's literally a lifeline saving Ukraine from shutting parts of it's government down

1

tgt_m Apr 23, 2026 +1

where was that money 4 years ago

1

Madbrad200 Apr 23, 2026 +1

The EU *was* loaning money to Ukraine [in 2022](https://time.com/6189296/eu-ukraine-loan-package/)

1

Prince Harry implores U.S. to do more for Ukraine during surprise Kyiv visit

💬 Send a Message

175 Comments