I don't think that the US has much spare after all of the stuff they dumped on Iran, and the anti-missile/drone missiles expended in different middle east countries (mostly Israel). They're going to be restocking for years.
29
herewegoagain19202 days ago
+22
That was always a big selling point. American weapon manufacturers making even more money. Fully funded by our taxes.
22
Rgv202 days ago
+29
I don’t think anyone got my bad joke. I was referencing his book titled Spare.😄
29
Thoroughaway0081 day ago
+9
I got it and chuckled 🤭
9
Rgv201 day ago
+3
Awesome!!! That makes me happy!😊
3
Araminal2 days ago
+2
Ah, that makes sense why you capitalised "Spare"!
2
MrDabb2 days ago
+1
Are stockpile numbers public?
1
Araminal2 days ago
+6
I wouldn't have thought so. That would be a security issue, but I suppose that there could be educated guesses made by some experts and intelligence services based on other information.
6
MrDabb2 days ago
+4
The US Military is known to understate capabilities. Take the B2 bomber for example, for years it was known it had a max payload capacity of 40k pounds until it went and carried two 30k pound bombs to bomb Iran. I wouldn't trust any figure put out or estimated.
4
dragnansdragon2 days ago
+3
Still blows my mind that within 100 years, we went from being able to barely sustain the weight of a single man in Kitty Hawk, to the engineering fetes we have today that can carry literal tons.
3
The_Parsee_Man2 days ago
+1
Seems like US still has some:
https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-war-us-weapons-prince-harry-f02a45281ba095d35cf5a198710be8e3
1
stormelemental131 day ago
+1
> I don't think that the US has much spare after all of the stuff they dumped on Iran
We will have hundreds of tanks in storage. Not reserve. Storage. And at lot of other vehicles as well that we're unlikely to ever use.
Those and the ammunition for them could all go to ukraine.
1
Araminal1 day ago
+1
Google says over 3,000 Abrams in long term storage, as well as multi-thousand other vehicles.
1
Rare_Eye_11652 days ago
+8
Maybe the prince who isn't a prince can give some of his own fortune.
8
GuaSukaStarfruit2 days ago
+2
Few? Nahhh give way more
2
Gomnanas2 days ago
+270
I thought he gave up his royal titles?
270
GaryJM2 days ago
+199
He stepped down from being a "working royal" in 2020, meaning he would no longer perform official functions on behalf of the monarch. He also announced he would becomd financially independent from the royal family. He and his wife kept their HRH styles but don't use them. He's still a prince and a duke.
199
Whitewind6172 days ago
+62
Not sure if people know this but the crown is not easily walked away from, it either takes an act of parliament, or you need to do something that gets you removed automatically (leaving the church of England, marrying someone without consent of the reigning monarch, etc.)
EDIT: This apparently has nothing to do with the title of "Prince," which I did not realize.
62
juleskikicobb2 days ago
+41
He didn’t walk away from the ‘crown’ because he would never be king (absent a wipeout of his brother’s family). It is open to him to never use any prince or duke titles. He chooses to use them.
41
Circle_Breaker2 days ago
+11
I think he's saying that he's still in line for the crown despite giving up his titles.
11
phluidity2 days ago
+12
See "The pedophile formerly known as Prince ~~Albert~~Andrew".
12
PorkchopFunny2 days ago
+7
Andrew
7
phluidity2 days ago
+4
D'oh
4
LongJohnSelenium2 days ago
+3
Literally you can just no call no show
3
maverickhawk992 days ago
+2
Not necessarily. Didn’t Charles strip his brother of his titles? I.e he’s no longer known as Prince Andrew. Didn’t require an act of parliament.
2
DanS19932 days ago
+13
Yeah titles are within the gift of the monarch and as such can be stripped by them. Hence why Andrew was stripped of his dukedom and prince title. The line of succession is governed by actual laws and so would require an act of parliament hence why Andrew is still in line for the throne.
13
Initial-Lead-28142 days ago
+5
not sure if people understand were not all British or have to care about royalty
5
Jealous_Response_4922 days ago
+58
Most of us Brits don't care. But if Harry can use his absurdly extreme privileged position to highlight and champion worthy causes, fair play to him.
58
3050_mjondalen2 days ago
+4
Atleast he seems to have some brain function compared to our Märtha louise lol
4
Funny-Salamander46911 day ago
+4
Well, no one asked you to comment on a story which features a British ex-Royal, but you did. Why not just scroll on by?
4
Initial-Lead-28141 day ago
+1
It involves him talking about my country
1
Flangepacket2 days ago
+2
I guarantee the oppressed people of Ukraine care rn, even if they didn’t before.
2
mattfromjoisey2 days ago
+1
Being a pedophile seemed to work for Andrew
1
Halgy2 days ago
+11
"This isn't even my job anymore, but *come on* Amercia"
11
ahhwhoosh2 days ago
+8
He’s Harry from Harry and Meghan now
8
lady_faust2 days ago
+4
Harry and the Meghansons
4
mofa902772 days ago
+11
He’s doing the same activities as Angelina Jolie, Shirley Temple Black, and Sean Penn: using his celebrity to keep attention focused on important causes.
11
[deleted]2 days ago
+2
[deleted]
2
savingrain2 days ago
+11
No he did not. You are mistaken. He only put his royal highness in abeyance and agreed not to use that. He is still Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex
11
GaryJM2 days ago
+7
Harry is absolutely still a prince. Are you maybe thinking of the king's brother Andrew?
7
ptapobane2 days ago
+27
>"This is a moment for American leadership, a moment for America to show that it can honor its international treaty obligations, not out of charity but out of its own enduring role in global security and strategic stability."
has he been living under a rock?
27
Aggressive-Dealer-211 day ago
+15
Been too busy enjoying all that royal entitlement without fulfilling any royal obligations.
15
Mogwai_112 days ago
+84
WE WANT PRIVACY!
84
Dr_MantisTobaggin_MD2 days ago
+5
Read my mind.
5
DamnOdd2 days ago
+11
While I agree, have you not seen our cult leader?
11
totallyRebb2 days ago
+78
Is this comment section full of Russian bots or something ?
The takes look very familiar.
78
Ok-Peanut37521 day ago
+16
No, it’s just a lot of mentally ill Royalists that are angry with Harry for leaving the royal family because he didn’t like how they were treating his wife or the British press and has decided to move to the US and raise his children there. Just a lot of people feeling rejected on behalf of Royals that don’t really do anything for them but they feel obligated to be outraged on their behalf nonetheless.
16
Kagerae1 day ago
-3
No it's just the hypocrisy of them both. "We want privacy" but then smiling for the cameras while pretending to be holier than thou, meghans got a massive victim complex, considering they wanted privacy they sure love posing at every given opportunity.
-3
Ok-Peanut37521 day ago
+11
They wanted to decide what they share with the public regarding their kids, totally reasonable and many on you know this but ignore the nuance because it doesn’t fit your agenda. They now have the ability to share parts of their lives that they feel comfortable with and still protect their children. They moved to America six years ago, don’t you think it’s time that some of you get over it and move on? Seriously, Meghan hasn’t even mentioned any member of the royal family by name publicly in five years and you’re all still mad.
11
throwawayyyywego20241 day ago
+7
They've never gotten over him marrying a black. And a black American of all things.
Tbh it's so much toned down from a few years ago cause I've heard some awful stuff. Ghetto, gold digger, "gonna move her family to his house" type shit. Every other week people were saying he would leave her or that he would find out she wasn't really pregnant and divorce her etc etc..it was crazy
7
GuaSukaStarfruit2 days ago
+16
Yeah brigaded
16
every-day_throw-away2 days ago
+88
While I agree with the message you are not the guy Harry.
88
savingrain2 days ago
+22
The main issue I see with this is it just comes off as whining from the uninformed. He’s not wrong in this instance but he also doesn’t represent any government or have any political power so it comes off as whining or trying to use his titles to influence government. You can look at it in this case and say it’s fine because I agree with him- but what about a case where one does not agree? He’s not an expert in this field. He has no authority. He’s a private citizen.
22
snushomie2 days ago
+37
Trump has a weird obsession with the royal family, every time that King Charles gives him attention he 180s his opinion on the UK/EU/Ukraine, like how recently he was talking about how NATO allies did nothing in Afghanistan etc and then after receiving a correspondence from Charles immediately posted how the UK soldiers were brave etc, it's honestly just a clever use of soft power for the UK since there are very few people Trump's ego will allow him to listen to even if you have a different opinion on any of them.
37
Joyceecos2 days ago
+13
He got it from his mother, she was British and was a fan of the royal family
13
sopheroo2 days ago
+64
Harry actually served and went to Afghanistan twice, so I don't really see why he's not the guy.
64
Kreos6422 days ago
+52
While he obviously has credit and experience to back him up, no regular person in the US, who is likely living a life with financial struggles, wants to hear it from a man born with a silver spoon whose biggest drama is moving out from his parents house because they dont like his wife.
52
so-much-wow2 days ago
+90
But most of them would prefer to hear it from a perpetual draft dodging, pedophile whose responsible for their financial struggles? Guess that says enough about the american people.
90
CoffeeStrength2 days ago
+9
*also born with a silver spoon in his mouth
9
Araminal2 days ago
+13
I up-voted this remark, and then down-voted it just so that I could up-vote it twice.
13
GuyWithPants2 days ago
+15
He's not saying it to convince regular persons in the US. He's saying it to convince the silver-spoon men actually running the place.
15
adamgerd2 days ago
+3
I mean half of them seem to want to hear it from Trump, hardly someone who’s less privileged financially
3
Xsiah2 days ago
+5
So why did they elect Trump as president?
5
Remarkable-Meal-2232 days ago
+1
If you think about it he's somewhat of a Pat Tillman-esque story though not exactly. He could have lived a life of luxury and nobody would have questioned him but he chose to fly in combat on a attack helicopter in Afghanistan.
I think you have to give him some sort of respect for that choice at least. I know the brits probably don't care (they're probably more upset with him breaking tradition) but as an American thats pretty impressive (he chose his own path). More impressive than being "royalty" (a thing you're just born to and requiring no choice or action of your own).
1
rabbitholeseverywher1 day ago
+3
Serving in the armed forces is a long-standing tradition in the royal family and in no way "choosing their own path". It's literally expected of them, and Harry's father, brother, uncle and aunt and grandmother (Queen Elizabeth) all did so.
Also fwiw Pat Tillman's mother criticized Harry over an award he was given in Pat's name, calling for it to be given to someone more worthy. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/pat-tillman-award-prince-harry-espys-mom-reacts-rcna159715
Nothing against Harry personally, just not at all into royals getting their asses kissed for shit civilians do every single day. He also chose not to make a monetary donation to Ukraine, which would have helped a lot more than his words.
3
Noughmad1 day ago
+1
> no regular person in the US, who is likely living a life with financial struggles, wants to hear it from a man born with a silver spoon
Apparently, more than half of the voters do.
1
Thee-Cat2 days ago
+8
It's just bad optics at this point.
Hate to use this comparison, but it's honestly reminds me of when Kim Kardashian does some charity or says something genuinely right. It IS a good thing. But...I mean...It's Kim Kardashian. We can appreciate that she brings some eyeballs to the situation. But she invokes so much more negativity from people than good, you'd almost prefer her to not say anything at all.
Faaaaar majority of people in UK don't want him doing these faux royal tours and faux royal statements. And the people in the US still don't even understand if he's a prince? Or just some spoiled rich kid using daddy's money to travel the world acting like a prince? Does his voice hold literally any more 'authority' than me or you?
If it IS just the 'celebrity' angle and bringing attention to an issue. Okay, great. But like I said, while he and Kim Kardashian can doing great work. And think most people just wish they'd leave it to more well respected voices who could actually rally virtually anyone to the cause.
8
every-day_throw-away1 day ago
+2
I served and deployed 4 times, I am also not the guy. It's not his service he is just not in the position to offer advice.
2
Sea_Error_57042 days ago
+5
lol "went to Afghanistan" You mean got babysat while playing video games and never saw a day of real danger? No, I don't give him any credit, and I don't want him speaking for me.
5
Natural_Plane_6571 day ago
+2
For a total of 2-3 months in total and protected by body guards.
2
Thee-Cat2 days ago
+1
This is well said.
It honestly feels akin to when "Kim Kardashian" will spearhead some charity or bring attention to some very real issue. It's genuinely good work we can all agree with. But...it's still Kim Kardashian. She brings such baggage, and invokes so much more negativity than positivity. That is almost seems better off her not saying anything, and just leaving it to someone with any actual authority, or at bare minimum, some at least marginally well-like celebrity that could actually steer public opinion.
1
InterestingPop96642 days ago
+16
Maybe he could donate all his money to Ukraine?
16
Thee-Cat2 days ago
+11
Thes faux royal tours to Australia aren't c****, y'know. lol
11
rabbitholeseverywher1 day ago
+2
Or even some. There was no monetary donation at all.
2
-wearetheworld-1 day ago
+3
prince?
3
myloxyloto19872 days ago
+21
Is he still in his world wide privacy tour.
21
autobannedforsatire2 days ago
+57
The US doesn’t have a prince. Maybe he should call home.
57
Gentle_Snail2 days ago
+59
The UK has been one of the most consistent and strongest backers of Ukraine, he doesn’t need to implore them.
59
Araminal2 days ago
+25
It has a wannabe king though.
25
SP15702 days ago
+6
Almost an Emperor, Palpatine style...
6
Idiot_Savant_132 days ago
+9
I'm fairly confident that Ukraine isn't going to trust the U.S. until & unless there is signficant regime change.
The U.S. is unreliable, untrustworthy, and this administration has sent 5 envoys to Moscow while sending precisely zero to Kyiv.
I doubt very much there's room for this relationship to be repaired until & unless those who tried to force Ukraine to yield to Russia's attack are no longer in power or able to influence Ukraine's future.
Just my guess, tho.
9
BrigadierKirk1 day ago
+1
I mean ukriane doesn't need to trust america and america doesnt need to trust ukriane tho?
Like is there any benifits to either party, all ukriane needs is america to give weapons to ukriane
1
Idiot_Savant_131 day ago
+1
Ever tried to schedule something with a flake?
If someone can't be trusted, even a simple transfer of weapons raises a fuckton of obvious questions:
• are these the right weapons?
• are they all there?
• are they functional?
• are they in good repair?
• is all the ammo with them?
• is the ammo in good condition?
• is this meeting secure?
• how can we be sure this meeting remains secure?
• are there trackers in the weapons?
• is the software in the weapons sabotaged?
• are only *some* of the weapons sabotaged?
...and this is just off the top of my head. Intel & Counter-intel people spend time coming up with methods that have to pass a much higher filter.
So, yeah - lying really is the dumbest thing a person can do, cuz it complicates every single deal around them.
Iran's kicking a lot of diplomatic butt right now just by not lying... & that stark contrast with the U.S. is stunning other nations awake.
1
Araminal2 days ago
+16
Putin's asset in the whitehouse isn't going to do shit.
16
Sufficient_Steak_8392 days ago
+15
What happened to this guy wanting privacy?
15
rcanhestro2 days ago
+3
privacy is not wanting journalists going after him everytime he takes a walk.
if he chooses to be on the "spotlight" out of his own accord, that seems fair.
3
Thee-Cat2 days ago
+7
Nah, he's just not used to being outside the protection of the royal family(who even themselves are not immune to sensational headlines).
If bro and his wife are apparently going about this as normal non-royals, living in mansions in the heart of LA surrounded by celebrities, partying at Kardashian birthday parties, going to big Netflix get-togethers, etc, etc. In what universe would they be the ONE couple in celebrity history to be immune to paparazzi, rumors, or sensational headlines?
7
Difficult-Break-82822 days ago
-5
he plus elton john and others won the wire tapping ' journalist' lawsuit . privacy is choosing what to say and keep private vs some scum stalking you to make money off headlines
-5
Intothebreach452 days ago
+7
Believe the case is now in the hands of the judge. A verdict will be announced at a future date.
7
BusyView66171 day ago
+2
Trump is looking for the UK and the Europeon Union to come to his rescue. They should remind him that Russia's trying to kick in their back door, and their time and weapons need to be focused in Ukraine. Maybe if Trump was able to understand Putin invaded Ukraine, and had interviened there years ago, the rest of the world would be in a position to help him out
2
Qwawn722 days ago
+8
Why does anyone care what this guy says?
8
Thee-Cat2 days ago
+10
That's the problem, they don't.
In fact he invokes infinitely more negativity than positivity at this point, even if what he's saying is correct. And would do better letting people who are even marginally respected or liked in the public sphere, to be doing this sort of stuff.
10
No_Football_92322 days ago
+5
Sorry Harry, that ship has sailed. The USA is in the side of ruzzia.
5
OriginalGoldstandard1 day ago
+3
You are not a wizard Harry. Stay out of it
3
HellBlazer_NQ2 days ago
+6
That's not going to go down well in America.
They only have one King. /s
6
Fredly_2 days ago
+4
There is only one former royal that Trump might listen to and Harry isn't him.
4
Creative-Lynx-15612 days ago
+7
Not american or british, but I though monarchy can't be political
7
whichwitch92 days ago
+7
He maybe a prince, but he's not a working royal on the UK side. On the North American side, he's a resident of the US, married to a US citizen, and a father of US citizens. Despite what the current US government would like to say, any person, born to a royal family or not, is allowed to speak to and criticize the US government. It is his and everyone else's right in accordance to our laws and traditions. He simply has a bigger platform than most. He's talking to the US government. He is good on that front, though Im sure talking heads in DC will imply otherwise because they're a bunch of thin skinned bastards
7
Combat_Orca2 days ago
+5
He’s not monarchy anymore
5
hiddenwalls2 days ago
+3
National politics, no (with exceptions), being involved in geopolitics is basically their job. Although less so with Harry as he resignedthat job but kept the title.
3
rcanhestro2 days ago
+1
they aren't "political" in domestic issues, but foreign matters is something different.
the royals are basically glorified diplomats.
1
explorerazure2 days ago
+1
The reigning monarch yes, the rest of them... meh
1
Substantial_Milk81702 days ago
+9
I’m pretty sure we fought a whole war in 1776 specifically so we wouldn’t have to take tax spending advice from British royalty.
9
ShoulderPast24332 days ago
+13
No. That was a war for independence.
13
siorge2 days ago
+36
I'm also pretty sure the people who died fighting this war would lose their minds if they saw what Trump is doing to their country
36
Canada19712 days ago
+27
Not to mention the people that died in WWII to restore democracy in Europe
27
siorge2 days ago
+12
We live in strange time. There is a famous French jewish man called Serge Klarsfeld. He spent his life chasing nazis to bring them to justice. He is now supporting the French far-right party (RN) because he believes the left is antisemitic. The RN was founded by waffen SS, the very men he spent his life chasing...
Post-truth world
12
Madbrad2002 days ago
+2
Wars aren't waged for moralistic reasons. Nazi Germany was thought because Nazi Germany was an existential threat to pretty much everyone in the region. Had nothing to do with democracy
2
Alive_Ad_31991 day ago
+3
If so, then why has the King been invited to address the US Congress next week?
3
explorerazure2 days ago
+2
Was actually parliament not the monarchy
2
Kagerae2 days ago
+3
For someone who wanted to stop being in the news he sure loves being in the news.
3
no_cojones19782 days ago
+4
I implore Harry to be less in the media.
4
PortiaPotty21 day ago
+4
Sorry Harry. The US 🇺🇸 doesn't take advice from a buffoon 🤡 such as yourself.
4
Oknocando2 days ago
+5
Harry can go f*** himself. Grifter
5
Thee-Cat2 days ago
+9
Yeah, he has so much baggage and invokes so much more negativity than positive. That it almost feels like, even when he might say something good or right, you just wanna say, Nah bro, please just go home, spend your daddy's money, let ANYONE with any modicum of authority or even favor with the general public, do this.
9
Halftied2 days ago
+4
He was royalty in the UK. He had no more voice in the US than Joe down the street. A lot of people are saying the same thing he said but they don't get heard. I mean he doesn't even rate up there with Sean Penn.
4
LukasJackson671 day ago
+3
Nobody cares what you think Harry
3
MisterBlisterKisser2 days ago
+5
Ugh. He and his b**** of a wife need to just go the hell away and stay out of world affairs. Let the actual royals speak on the world stage.
5
cig-nature2 days ago
+2
> "The United States has a singular role in this story not only because of its power but because when Ukraine gave up nuclear weapons, America was part of the assurance that Ukraine's sovereignty and borders would be respected," he said. "This is a moment for American leadership, a moment for America to show that it can honor its international treaty obligations, not out of charity but out of its own enduring role in global security and strategic stability."
I don't disagree with this. But I'm confused why he left America to talk to Americans.
2
RTPdude2 days ago
-1
why doesn't he ask the UK to do more?
-1
siorge2 days ago
+25
because the UK is one of Ukraine's strongest ally while the US proudly brags that abandoning Ukraine is their greatest recent foreign policy achievement...
25
jack56242 days ago
+13
Well the UK is the only signatory of the Budapest memorandum who didn’t then proceed to break it.
13
Gentle_Snail2 days ago
+23
The UK is consistently one of Ukraine’s strongest backers, while the US keeps threatening to pull support.
23
HoneybucketDJ2 days ago
+8
US support to Ukraine - 115 billion
UK support to Ukraine - ~~15 billion~~ 20 billion
8
Gentle_Snail2 days ago
+12
The UK has provided £20 billion.
America has provider 0.58% of GDP, Britain has provided 0.76% of GDP.
https://www.kielinstitut.de/topics/war-against-ukraine/ukraine-support-tracker/
12
HerMajestyTheQueef12 days ago
+12
He has and does though UK is already one of the greatest supporters of Ukraine, they don't need to be told as much in this regard, whereas US under trump regime is appears to be more helpful to putin.
12
RecommendationOwn3001 day ago
+3
Mr Mischief what are you doing in Ukraine and giving ridiculous speeches
3
Tatertothotspot2 days ago
+2
Isn’t he a millionaire? You send money !!! If he is so dedicated, sell your house and send money to the cause !!
2
Madbrad2002 days ago
+6
Harry [does donate](https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/prince-harry-donates-500000-help-wounded-children-ukraine-gaza-2025-09-10/) to Ukraine and like the rest of us, he pays taxes and like the rest of us, is entitled to voice on what those taxes should be spent on.
Millions aren't enough to win a war
6
AdTop96632 days ago
+4
60 million dollars net worth !!!! Actions speak louder than words
4
Thee-Cat2 days ago
+1
Well he wanted to....but....but.....he and the wifey had to focus on the new faux royal tour in Australia. Being a fake royal is quite expensive these days, you know. lol
1
Starlifter42 days ago
+1
Prince of what?
1
DavidlikesPeace2 days ago
+3
That ship has sailed sir.
Europe must help itself and Ukraine. They must abandon dependency on America
We all have to face hard truths. America is likely facing a civil war or democratic breakdown into tyranny. Their elites are enmeshed in their selfish own butts, as well as a major land war in Asia. They won't help anybody in Europe.
Stop counting on a cruel president to perform a selfless act.
3
RemoteClub6312 days ago
+4
Stop cryin karen, Europe has all these immigrants flowing in , it can build a powerful army that will be led by macron Ursula and dirty sanchez
4
AWinterPeople2 days ago
+3
How many trips away from his kids does this make now in the last few months?
3
Madbrad2002 days ago
+2
Believe it or not plenty of people in the real world travel regularly for work.
2
AWinterPeople2 days ago
+5
Yes I was one of them but HE doesn’t travel for WORK…
5
Madbrad2002 days ago
+1
How many days did you spend away from your kids?
1
yahoonews2 days ago
[CBS reports](https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/prince-harry-implores-u-more-111048257.html?ncid=listnooknewsus) \- Prince Harry, the younger son of Britain's King Charles, made an unannounced visit to Ukraine on Thursday to show his support for the country, which he said is "bravely and successfully defending Europe's eastern flank."
During an address at the Kyiv Security Forum on Thursday morning, Harry contrasted European support for Ukraine with the United States.
"The United States has a singular role in this story not only because of its power but because when Ukraine gave up nuclear weapons, America was part of the assurance that Ukraine's sovereignty and borders would be respected," he said. "This is a moment for American leadership, a moment for America to show that it can honor its international treaty obligations, not out of charity but out of its own enduring role in global security and strategic stability."
0
Optimal_Anxiety68642 days ago
+1
Yahoo news has a Listnook account
1
All_Hail_Hynotoad2 days ago
+1
Has he not been paying attention? This administration does not care about Ukraine.
1
Few_Occasion4582 days ago
+1
Harry, I think we agree. We just have this one old, fat, corrupt problem.
1
Significant_Tree84072 days ago
+1
No money for Trump in Ukraine.
1
Skyisonfire1 day ago
+1
Would love to but my tax dollars are going towards genocide.
1
purplewhiteblack1 day ago
+1
Why is Putin so much better at poisoning his enemies than the reverse?
1
chase-michael1 day ago
+1
What does he tell the UK?
1
starsqream18 hr ago
+1
Lol, Meghan told him
1
catplayermeow1 day ago
+1
Sadly under this administration, Ukraine will not receive any help at all. In fact, it looks like Russia benefited more than Ukraine as they are allowed to sell oil more freely ever since the Iran War.
While the majority of American support Ukraine and want them to win, other countries are going to help them survive because due to politics they probably will not see any assistance for a while.
1
mrstims2 days ago
-1
Get outta here Harry. Go home. You are just a celebrity who thinks we should listen to him.
-1
hookahsmokingladybug1 day ago
+2
Stfu Harry; you aren't even a citizen here. Just keep grifting....as ever
2
FishInferno2 days ago
+1
He didn’t say it, he *implored* it.
1
retro_underpants2 days ago
+2
Why are they not speaking on all the things that are happening in the US where they live and their children are growing up? They wanted to leave the Royal Family so they could be a force for change and use their voices. The only use they’ve been put to is chatting with Netflix.
2
Jazz-Again1 day ago
+1
Ehhh… how about asking your own country to do more, rich boy.
1
Educational-Bus-78271 day ago
+1
Get your daddy to pay like he does your bills wanker
1
flubluflu22 days ago
+1
I really don't know why he left the Royal family if he wants to keep making statements like this, I'm sure he regrets it a lot, his words would have carried more weight had he stayed within the family circle and could have been an influence and force for good in that role. One of the strangest decisions.
1
Thee-Cat2 days ago
+4
I think a part of it has to do with how desire to power is never satisfied. And even being "second best", "second in line to the throne", etc, is not enough.
Even a dude and his wife who were destined to live a lifetime of luxury, be beloved by millions and a celebrity everywhere you go just for being born into the right family, and even be able to speak(to issues like this) with an almost inherent authority. Still gave it all up, because he was, in his own words, "the spare" in the family.
Coming from one of the richest, luckiest, and privileged persons in modern history, is what made most of us normal folk go, WTH is this guy on about?
4
SuUU25642 days ago
Kiss of death, FFS he is a terrible messenger. This is the sort of thing that will turn everyday Americans off support. His name is a tainted.
0
niceufo7772 days ago
-1
hahaha, you have no power here.
-1
OutsideJack-19992 days ago
-2
While I agree, this doesn’t need to come from him.
-2
Krazilia-Love2 days ago
Can someone implore that the US do more for its actual citizens who pay for all the work that is done in other countries?
0
Madbrad2002 days ago
+2
You'd be paying significantly more if Russia was allowed to succeed and proceeds with waging war across Europe.
2
gumby_twain2 days ago
-3
Why doesn’t the prince do more? I head his family is pretty wealthy and influential.
Useless git
-3
Mysterious-Prompt2122 days ago
-1
He does realize that Tramp is a kompromot?
-1
Aretirednurse812 days ago
-1
I thought he was not doing royal duties anymore?
-1
FeeWeak11382 days ago
-2
Donald, time to send this uneducated fool packing back to England.
-2
lizardan2 days ago
-4
What about f****** Europe doing anything about it
-4
rcanhestro2 days ago
+2
the Europe that has constanly been helping Ukraine and just today approved a 90 billion "loan" to them?
2
Madbrad2002 days ago
+1
Europe literally just approved a 90 billion loan
1
lizardan2 days ago
+2
Pennies
2
Madbrad2002 days ago
+1
It's literally a lifeline saving Ukraine from shutting parts of it's government down
1
tgt_m1 day ago
+1
where was that money 4 years ago
1
Madbrad2001 day ago
+1
The EU *was* loaning money to Ukraine [in 2022](https://time.com/6189296/eu-ukraine-loan-package/)
175 Comments