· 199 comments · Save ·
For Sale Mar 27, 2026 at 10:10 PM

‘Project Hail Mary’ Directors Screened a Nearly Four-Hour Cut to Other Filmmakers and Were Told to Get it Way Shorter

Posted by MarvelsGrantMan136


‘Project Hail Mary’ Directors Screened a Nearly Four-Hour Cut to Other Filmmakers and Were Told to ‘Get It Way Shorter’: ‘It Was Embarrassing’
Variety
‘Project Hail Mary’ Directors Screened a Nearly Four-Hour Cut to Other Filmmakers and Were Told to ‘Get It Way Shorter’: ‘It Was Embarrassing’
'Project Hail Mary' directors Phil Lord and Chris Miller screened a nearly four-hour cut to other filmmakers and were told to 'get it way shorter.'

🚩 Report this post

199 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
DLun203 Mar 27, 2026 +1874
I want the scenes with them paving the Sahara to farm astrophage and nuking Antarctica to release methane into the atmosphere
1874
Agilgar Mar 27, 2026 +840
I was really dissapointed they didnt add the Antarctica scene, that was a heavy one that really illustrated how serious an issue the astrophage was
840
liketo Mar 27, 2026 +377
That’s one thing that wasn’t emphasised enough - how precarious the situation for Earth was
377
shewy92 Mar 28, 2026 +64
One thing they did do is show how cold it was getting and how dim the sun was. Every scene had them wearing more clothes. At the end Grace was wearing a beanie which is when I realized what they were showing
64
willy--wanka Mar 28, 2026 +30
Ohh, that didn't even click. Good call man.
30
sundayultimate Mar 28, 2026 +4
You might not have noticed it, but your brain did
4
User_091920 Mar 28, 2026 +1
My brain definitely noticed because I thought *damn he's really well dressed*
1
liketo Mar 28, 2026 +1
It’s true - subtle signs vs ramming the point home. On multiple watches I’m sure it will be clearer too.
1
TKHawk Mar 27, 2026 +92
I mean, they did say half the world's population would be wiped out from starvation and war. The movie was a fairly optimistic and fun film about overcoming, so I understand not spending too much time emphasizing how desperate everyone is on Earth. (Also the 'humanity is ultra desperate' thing undermines the Stratt probably goes to jail idea for me, if people are willing to nuke the ice caps, they're willing to let Stratt do what she thinks is necessary)
92
ChucksnTaylor Mar 27, 2026 +19
Wait, I’ve read the book but have not yet seen the movie. Is wiping out half the population the extent of how the movie frames it? In the book, the endgame is complete extinction if the problems isnt dealt with, does the movie imply humanity will continue regardless?
19
0-kule Mar 28, 2026 +70
No, she was talking about what Grace would witness in his lifetime if he stayed on earth. She was trying to convince him to go willingly.
70
joemeteorite8 Mar 28, 2026 +16
I think she says half the population in the first 30 years. Before or around the time they get any answers back
16
haganbmj Mar 28, 2026 +1
I'm paraphrasing, but the conversation is basically "half the population in 30 years, if everyone cooperates - which they won't." The tone makes it pretty obvious that it will continue to get worse from there. I think narratively the issue for the movie is that both the scene about Astrophage enrichment using the Sahara and nuking Antarctica introduce new locations, characters, and dialogue while ultimately not telling us anything more about Grace as a character or adding any elements that come into play aboard the Hail Mary.
1
Typical-Blackberry-3 Mar 27, 2026 +176
The skipped over a lot of the science and the severity of the situation.
176
T-Rex_Jesus Mar 27, 2026 +27
I think this is why I found Grace's cowardice more infuriating in the books vs the movie. Book really made the situation feel dire and like there truly wasn't time to train a new science officer 
27
Splinterman11 Mar 28, 2026 +20
Yeah the book had the issue where Grace had the genetic markers that would give him a better chance at surviving the long coma. However the movie didn't have that, so it's kinda less important that Grace was chosen in the movie compared to the books. In the book, basically no one else but Grace could go on the mission.
20
bflynn65 Mar 28, 2026 +1
Stratt very bluntly tells him (and the audience) how dire the situation is and why they can't wait to train a new science officer.
1
Hokuboku Mar 28, 2026 +4
I didn't read the book but I still felt the stakes were high. Every star was dying but one, people died preparing for the mission due to an accident, the whole speech about how much of humanity would be dead in thirty years
4
Devilsadvocate430 Mar 27, 2026 +68
I thought we were about to get that scene in one of the final moments of the movie, when you can see the icebreaker cutting through sea ice (this scene is literally in the trailer) but no, it’s just a character going to a military installation somewhere cold.
68
r_x_f Mar 27, 2026 +146
I think it's implied that the entire ocean is that way due to lack of sunlight.
146
uglyuglyugly_ Mar 28, 2026 +13
Yeah, I feel like it's easy enough to infer if you have been paying attention really. Stratt being much older and in the middle of a frozen sea because the Earth is freezing over due to the sun dying. While it would be neat to see, we don't really need a scene of them using the Tauamoeba since it is the logical next step.
13
SavedByThe1990s Mar 27, 2026 +14
fwiw, that implication didnt dawn on me at all. i just thought it was a normal icy part of earth. the missus, who read the book days before seeing the movie, enlightened me about the reality. i think there needed to be something else on screen that helped drive home that earth’s oceans were mostly like that. but with that said, it was a phenomenal movie!
14
LordFalcoSparverius Mar 27, 2026 +12
Yeah, put that scene and have the Sydney Opera House in the background, and it becomes way more impactful.
12
CapMarkoRamius Mar 28, 2026 +3
Isn't that how >!Sunshine!< ended?
3
give-bike-lanes Mar 27, 2026 +29
That point of that is to show that all the oceans are frozen over
29
CriticalDog Mar 27, 2026 +8
I was pretty sure that was rhe same base they used in the first part of rhe movie. Which also tells you how cold things got.
8
Casen_ Mar 27, 2026 +50
I just wanted a 9 episode mini series.
50
Shepherdsfavestore Mar 28, 2026 +2
I think it would be tough because you’d have to introduce the French environmentalist’s character, have some exposition scenes on him, then do the Antarctica stuff. As a huge fan of the book I’d absolutely watch a 4 hour cut with all that. General audiences though? Probably not. I think they did a good job of streamlining everything.
2
TitularFoil Mar 28, 2026 +1
That's the one moment when you really realize how devastating the astrophage situation is. I'm surprised it isn't there.
1
Pardybro911 Mar 27, 2026 +75
I bet a lot of the cut stuff is Earth stuff honestly. They skimmed over all of that but it was nice getting the Stratt epilogue
75
coldblade2000 Mar 28, 2026 +32
The screenwriter said in an interview that they fought very hard to keep stuff in the movie, and the only big one they failed to keep was the antartica scene. It ultimately boils down to "is this absolutely crucial to the plot and heart of the movie?". The Antartica scene drives home the point that earth went to shit, but you didn't really NEED the scene to understand that.
32
rhunter99 Mar 27, 2026 +87
I want the scene of Grace eating clones of himself
87
CosmackMagus Mar 27, 2026 +48
Mmmm, meburgers.
48
TheDwilightZone Mar 28, 2026 +13
Just want to clarify to non readers: cloned meat is not the same as clones *harvested* for meat.
13
mfyxtplyx Mar 27, 2026 +22
Have not yet seen the movie or read the book and am way too high for this comment.
22
Shepherdsfavestore Mar 28, 2026 +8
Why are you in this thread
8
switchy85 Mar 28, 2026 +7
They said they're pretty high. It's easy to just stumble into threads you shouldn't in that state.
7
itshuey88 Mar 27, 2026 +24
I really missed some of the earth science stuff. thought it was a huge unique element of what made the book special
24
JatZibui Mar 28, 2026 +1
Yep. It’s the best thing about the book. Though there is a bit too much of that in the book and close to none of it in the movie. And every scienc-y stuff is explained in one line in the movie.
1
DuckCleaning Mar 27, 2026 +35
They glossed over so much stuff versus the book. Oh you know how to breed it, okay lets breed it, done, blastoff. Same for the Taumoeba, within 30 seconds he goes from taking it out and testing it, to having it fully bred to handle nitrogen.
35
VirtualMoneyLover Mar 28, 2026 +31
Well, because movie watchers don't care. Also that is how you get a 4 hours movie.
31
willy--wanka Mar 28, 2026 +7
The whole time I was sitting there thinking, "so how are they going to explain the fuel going bad?," but they only explained it for a second.
7
DuckCleaning Mar 28, 2026 +4
Every revelation took 0.1s of thinking.
4
jfk_47 Mar 28, 2026 +3
I want the scene with Strat in the courtroom. Great way to show her power.
3
FishGoldenLite Mar 28, 2026 +2
It’s been years since the read I book and totally forgot about the Antarctica plot line. Now I feel ripped off.
2
MarvelsGrantMan136 Mar 27, 2026 +1529
Chris Miller & Phil Lord: >“Our first official test screening went great, but we do a lot of earlier screenings for friends and family and other filmmakers and writers,” Miller explained. “This movie was massive. When we finally got the assembly cut down to under four hours long, we subjected some filmmaker friends of ours to a three hour and 45 minute cut of the movie, which was embarrassing.” >Lord noted that the feedback the directing duo got was unanimous: “Get it way shorter.” >“You just don’t know how the scenes are going to land with an audience,” Lord said. “We thought everything was charming, but some of those charming things didn’t land. It made it really easy to get it down to three hours.” >“Then we had to slowly, slowly work our way down to 2.5 hours,” Miller added, which is around the final length of the movie’s theatrical cut.
1529
GrinningPariah Mar 27, 2026 +2080
I'm not sure that 4 hour cut is going to be great, but I *definitely* need to see that 3 hour cut.
2080
TootCannon Mar 27, 2026 +561
I’m not sure I want to see the four-hour cut, but I definitely want to know what’s in that extra 1.5 hours.
561
jrbcnchezbrg Mar 27, 2026 +514
Im assuming it contains some major plot points on preparing for the apocalypse on earth. Theres some major ecological stuff they had to do to give earth a lifeline for 22 years
514
Silist Mar 27, 2026 +181
They also made no mention of time dilation at all, which I think would not be great for the casual viewer anyway, so it’s a good omission
181
oo_renDer Mar 27, 2026 +140
In a weird way, they did. He mentions that the journey back home will be 4 years, which at first I thought must be a mistake because wasn’t the star 8 light years away? But then after the movie I realized it could be 4 years from his perspective if he’s getting closer to the speed of light. So if you don’t know about time dilation and speed of light, you probably also didn’t notice the short flight time, and if you do, you could figure it out by yourself. Which is pretty cool story telling.
140
cephalopodface Mar 28, 2026 +137
There's actually a bit of a point around this in the book - the Eridians didn't know about relativity, and the reason Rocky has enough fuel to power Grace's return journey is that they thought their trip would take much longer.
137
JeannValjean Mar 28, 2026 +55
One of my very few gripes of how they adapted the book was with Rocky implying he could give RG extra fuel by extending the travel time of his own trip home. After RG had already mentioned they didn't know about relativity. I guess it made Rocky look slightly more heroic in some way, but I liked how in the book it was basically "Oh, I've got plenty of extra fuel you can have since we calculated wrong." Interstellar handled it by having an astronaut explain relativity to ~~other astronauts~~ the audience in a short exposition dump ending with "That's relativity, folks."
55
haganbmj Mar 28, 2026 +1
You just articulated the difference though - you can either play it off as a joke, "oops, we brought too much," or you make it more of a sacrifice to show how the relationship between Grace and Rocky has grown. I know Grace still gets a bit emotional in the book, but I think the movie made the right choice as it better aligns with the tighter themes of bravery, loss, and sacrifice.
1
oorza Mar 28, 2026 +1
There's two other scenes where RG does math to calculate fuel burn, they can't launch the mission without enough fuel, the fuel cells become a plot point in Adrian... fuel management was an ongoing theme with every step of this movie. When Rocky offers the fuel to RG, RG is still at a place in his own head where he can't accept that there's hope, that he's worth someone making a sacrifice for, and the entire emotional arc of the back half of the movie pivots on that moment. They start setting you up for the impact of that offer from the very first scene.
1
Dvscape Mar 28, 2026 +1
Reading your comment, I just realized that both the character and the actor share the same initials.
1
Exatraz Mar 28, 2026 +1
I like that book explanation because it keeps true to Rocky's smart but dumb motif.
1
GPT-5-Mod Mar 28, 2026 +29
11.9 light-years iirc, which made me scratch my head for a minute before realizing how fast he must be going.
29
mikeem Mar 28, 2026 +30
I think in the book they say he gets as fast as 89% of light speed before he has to start decelerating. He was going fast fast
30
b3ntothemax Mar 28, 2026 +1
That wouldn't be near fast enough to get it to 4 years subjective though. I think the number would be closer to .995 C
1
Magnetoreception Mar 28, 2026 +1
I’m getting 0.9418 which is still up there but not nearly what you have.
1
Badgerman97 Mar 28, 2026 +48
Made no mention but it is there. He mentions Rocky doesn’t understand relativity and it is also clear that the German lady who led the program has aged by a couple decades at the end while he appears the same age. So if you understand time dilation it is plainly visible (and does not need explanation). If you don’t understand relativity you probably won’t understand it from a few more lines in the film anyway.
48
TheGRS Mar 28, 2026 +12
Decent subplot in the book about Rocky’s world not knowing the science for various things yet. They did a really great job explaining the radiation sickness stuff. Otherwise not super important to the overall plot IMO.
12
Dislodged_Puma Mar 27, 2026 +161
They’ve talked extensively how they cut the nuking of Antarctica from the movie, but I haven’t seen anyone mention them filming paving the Sahara at all. Honestly, I’d have to guess the extra time is just more science between Rocky and Grace. They spend a lot of time on it in the book and finding their groove together, finding out that Rocky is an incredible engineer who isn’t great at space stuff, etc. They really glossed over them becoming best friends in the movie for the sake of a good tight narrative.
161
pwnd32 Mar 27, 2026 +139
I think they captured their friendship well enough as is, although I do think some additional scenes of bonding between those two would’ve made the >!decision of Grace to go back for Rocky more impactful. They also could’ve included the dilemma that Grace has about running out of food, because that is such a huge part of the tension behind Grace’s decision to go back to save him. He’s not just giving up his ability to go back to Earth, but he makes the decision believing that he will be killing himself if he saves Rocky.!<
139
jrbcnchezbrg Mar 27, 2026 +84
That part coming right after the reveal hes always been a coward was an excellent full circle moment for me too. I liked how it was framed as a vlog in the movie though “as much as I’d love to say I told you so, you were right”
84
willy--wanka Mar 28, 2026 +20
I like how the book covered them reuniting more than the movie showed. Rocky seemed ecstatic to see Grace in the book where in the movie it just seemed like, "ok cool, what now?"
20
_Svankensen_ Mar 28, 2026 +12
Haven't watched the movie yet, but, that moment in the book was incredible. So poignant.
12
dwerg85 Mar 28, 2026 +12
The tension in the book around that whole scene is way higher. But there's a bunch of science and backstory needed for the tension to make sense that they had to wave away in the film.
12
CashmereLogan Mar 27, 2026 +77
There’s practically no science problem-solving in the movie which was, by far, the best part of the book. Have to imagine a lot of that was included and it was the easiest to cut out. The core relationship works without that, even though it’s really interesting stuff.
77
guardiand0wn Mar 28, 2026 +16
So should I wait for the extended directors cut before watching? Just finished the book. Incredible. And the science stuff , incredible.
16
friarcrazy Mar 28, 2026 +54
No, absolutely not. The theatrical cut was unbelievable. The audiobook is 16 hours long, the movie is 2.5 hours. If you’re expecting EVERYTHING to be there, completely unabridged, you’re going to be disappointed.
54
Nuiwzgrrl1448 Mar 28, 2026 +17
The audio book is just THAT GOOD I don't remember it being 16 hours long. I listened years ago and just remember starting the story whenever I had a free chunk of time. Wow!
17
guardiand0wn Mar 28, 2026 +5
You know what, next Andy Weir book made to a movie must be like kill bill. Volume 1 and Volume 2 but released at the same time.
5
Top-Literature8218 Mar 27, 2026 +24
They also glossed over the translation problem, the movie made it look pretty trivially easy. I went with a couple, one who had read the book and one who hadn't, and the one who hadn't was very confused about the hand waving there. Overall, great film though, we all loved it!
24
cookedbread Mar 28, 2026 +16
The book made it seem trivially easy too
16
15minutesofshame Mar 28, 2026 +1
Easily my biggest gripe with the book. Like, we can’t even do that with two human cultures. I think it would have made mich more sense for Rock to come up with the translation tech as he already is more acoustically advanced.
1
FluffySloth27 Mar 28, 2026 +1
As a fellow movie-firster, yeah, that was super confusing. It seemed as if Rocky just understood Grace from the get-go and Grace was trying to play catch up. But then Rocky was asking for certain words? That’s how I felt about the whole movie, really. Focused on the vibes and hand-wavey about all the nitty gritty. Except the Earth science segments. Those were fun.
1
AnnieTheThird Mar 27, 2026 +53
front_yard_duck_dad Mar 28, 2026 +7
I guarantee they decided to leave that out because it ruins the "feel good " vibe of making us helplessly facing imment doom as a species. I want to see that directors cut though
7
Blackstar1886 Mar 28, 2026 +2
Yeah I wasn't thrilled they took out all the science in the movie.
2
Coal_Morgan Mar 27, 2026 +19
I’ll watch the four hour cut. I’d love to compare and contrast what they thought was necessary versus removable. I feel like a bunch of the heinous stuff Stratt was forced to do was cut and I’d love to see it.
19
DeezyEast Mar 27, 2026 +24
The film felt so fast, especially the scenes developing Grace and Rocky’s friendship. I would definitely love to see what’s in those 1.5 hours.
24
wreck-sauce Mar 28, 2026 +5
Rocky and graces friendship felt a little rushed but more or less pretty organic. The missed one for me is the relationship between stratt and grace. In the book there relationship ship is so much more flushed out. It really makes there final scene together a lot less emotionally impactful and gut punchy!
5
ph33rlus Mar 27, 2026 +10
Probably more details around the astrophage being used for propulsion, and the way Grace and Rocky created their communication medium. The book has way more detail on those things that the movie condensed. I’m all for a longer cut. Loved the movie
10
beam05 Mar 27, 2026 +20
You really should read the book. The film left out A LOT.
20
TootCannon Mar 27, 2026 +6
I did. That’s precisely why I want to know what’s in the 1.5 hours.
6
alfooboboao Mar 27, 2026 +7
when I read the book I was thinking “this is roughly a miniseries’ worth of plot”
7
atrain728 Mar 27, 2026 +5
Math. Lots of math. For what it’s worth, it was at four hours that they finally started sharing it. They had more than that. I want all of it.
5
ajd660 Mar 27, 2026 +4
There was a ton of stuff glossed over in the movie and they pretty much removed a lot of the more science stuff. Things like the beetles and some of the disasters that Rocky and Grace face.
4
Arniellico Mar 28, 2026 +3
I watched the Justice League Snyder cut. I can tank 4 hours 🤣
3
radol Mar 28, 2026 +2
There was quite a bit of simple physics experimenting before Grace figured out where he is and what is going on, I assume this could be at least 15 additional minutes. Also he and Rocky shared a lot of details regarding their natural environments and technology which were completely missing from the movie.
2
Xenokinesis Mar 27, 2026 +29
Yeah, I want it bad, at least the three hour one. I bet it has more technical problem solving scenes which I always adore. In addition to more earth scenes.
29
Dangerous_Panic7432 Mar 27, 2026 +9
Honestly just a little more explanation behind the science would've been good.
9
GrinningPariah Mar 28, 2026 +6
My fondest hope is that extra half hour between the theatrical cut and the 3 hour one is spread throughout the movie in 1-3 sentence snippets of science.
6
CoastingUphill Mar 28, 2026 +1
That aspect for sure felt rushed and cut for time
1
Thenadamgoes Mar 28, 2026 +2
This is one of the few times I’ll ever say it but I think the 4 hour cut could actually improve the movie.
2
nemoknows Mar 28, 2026 +2
Nah I want the miniseries version, at least 6 episodes.
2
LouDiamond Mar 27, 2026 +154
The last 30% felt a bit rushed, I'd wager that would be where most of the cuts happened
154
Coal_Morgan Mar 27, 2026 +58
That and the stuff Stratt did that she thought would end her up in prison forever. It’s not necessary for the Grace Rocky relationship and the primary theme of Grace becoming heroic.
58
shannister Mar 28, 2026 +31
Yeah when we get to Adrienne, as a reader I kept thinking “wow wow wow, slow down!”  The stakes never felt big in the movie - always expedited. I do think it could be 15/20 minutes longer to let those land.  Other than that, the adaptation was a masterclass - it got everything it needed to get from the book and took just the right amount of liberties to make it work as a film.
31
LouDiamond Mar 28, 2026 +15
leaving out the origin of the meat he eats... criminal exclusion!
15
Splinterman11 Mar 28, 2026 +7
A ton of the more problem solving science stuff was either cut or part of a montage where they just show Grace doing science stuff. In the book its all explained but the movie pacing was a little too fast.
7
LouDiamond Mar 28, 2026 +3
Even the process of him, wondering how he knows some things was amazing in the book
3
AsleepTonight Mar 27, 2026 +22
Release the Miller&Lord Cut!
22
Orange-Toed-Lemur Mar 27, 2026 +61
If we get more details about Rocky's society, i will absolutely go back to the movies for that
61
MusaEnsete Mar 27, 2026 +26
I'll take all 4 hours, thank you. So much of the science-based tension was just cut out; it was obvious they had explained things in missing scenes with the treatment of some of said tensions.
26
ssovm Mar 28, 2026 +1
>!“But you’d need a ship to go the speed of light!” “Good thing we have one.”!< >!“I wonder what’s causing the astrophage to be contained!” “It must be an organism on the planet!!< I completely understand why they had to do it this way but it was just funny how a great mystery was solved almost immediately.
1
MadManMax55 Mar 27, 2026 +32
> When we finally got the *assembly cut* down to under four hours long This whole article is either clickbait or they don't understand how movies work. Basically every big Hollywood movie starts with a 3-4 hour assembly cut. It's basically every scene they shot, with the only edits being shot choices and timing within scenes (and sometimes even that isn't completed). Which usually means there's a bunch of redundant or pointless scenes and horrendous pacing. Every time without fail they're cut down to "normal" length. The only time I can think of anything close to an assembly cut being released and actually being well received was the Lord of the Rings extended editions. And even those were significantly edited down.
32
weaseleasle Mar 27, 2026 +8
Even those weren't close to assembly cuts. There are loads of scenes we have seen clips of or stills, that never made it into any version of the films.
8
TomClancy5873 Mar 27, 2026 +17
TIL It’s directed by the 21 Jim Street guys
17
SPEK2120 Mar 27, 2026 +24
*21 Jeff Street
24
millennial_dad Mar 27, 2026 +6
My name is Jeff
6
ultrahello Mar 27, 2026 +19
So… they ended up with a 20 minute karaoke scene but a 20 second amoeba escape scene setting up the last act of the movie?
19
Evello37 Mar 28, 2026 +27
The amoeba escape and search for Rocky's ship was definitely one of the biggest cuts, and karaoke one of the biggest additions, but I think both are justified from an overall character perspective. That entire amoeba escape sequence contributes very little to the central character arcs of the movie. Grace's arc is all about learning to trust Rocky, then overcoming his cowardice through love of a friend. Having Grace solve tedious technical problems by himself doesn't really forward that arc at all. The important part is the subsequent decision to run away or save Rocky. So the movie speeds through the amoeba problem offscreen to get to the important character beat. The last chunk of the movie also cannot afford to drag, since the audience already sat through a fakeout ending. The audience is prepared for you to wrap things up, not do a bunch of technical exposition. The karaoke scene, by contrast, is all about characterizing Stratt. She is a cold, pragmatic character who betrays our hero and condemns him to death, so the audience is going to want to write her off as the villain. The karaoke scene gives her a moment to show vulnerability and humanity, and to make it clear how much she respects and cares for Grace and the crew. She isn't an ego-tripping maniac who thinks she's above everyone. She values her chats with Grace, and she is willing to be vulnerable with her crew. This drives home the fact that she doesn't send Grace to space out of malice or disregard, but specifically because she believes in him. I felt the scene ran a little long, but it was pretty important to the characters. Without all the time bonding with Stratt that the book can afford, I think a scene like the karaoke was necessary.
27
kaplanfx Mar 28, 2026 +1
I just want to point out that Stratt didn’t “betray our hero”, she sacrificed him to save humanity. It was the right decision even if it was awful.
1
BreezyBill Mar 27, 2026 +861
The filmmakers: We had an embarrassingly-lame 4 hour version at one point. Everyone here: Release the 4-hour cut!
861
DamienStark Mar 27, 2026 +161
They're not saying the contents were "embarrassingly-lame", they're saying that pitching a 4 hour movie to other professionals is lame. Obviously you're not gonna take a movie that long to theaters, cuts have to be made. But that doesn't mean the material which was cut was bad, just that there was too much of it.
161
mrpurtle Mar 27, 2026 +71
It was an assembly cut. Most movies have one and they are usually bad because they are full of redundant scenes, bad jokes, and scenes that go nowhere. Everyone screaming for the 4 hour cut would be severely disappointed if they actually saw it.
71
TheManyFacetsOfRoger Mar 27, 2026 +16
I mean they did say a lot of the stuff they thought would work, just didn’t work. So it doesn’t sound like the cuts really neutered the movie in a significant way
16
Zap29 Mar 27, 2026 +2
Meanwhile Lav Diaz
2
User_091920 Mar 28, 2026 +1
*"The secret to getting a 4 hour cut is to screen a 10 hour cut first. Then tell your friends you'll cut out 6 hours.* *Or better yet just keep it at 10 hours"*
1
Ryan_e3p Mar 28, 2026 +7
Honestly, I'd absolutely go for it. Let there be times, minute after minute, of just.... *nothing*. Just allowing the audience to absorb just how lonely and isolating Ryland's journey was (up to a point, that is). Not like, hours of just silence and nothing happening, but not every moment needs to be action or humor packed. Let there be silence aside from the whirring of any machines or air circulators in the background. Seems like too many movies are afraid of "the void" and need to fill it, but when done right, absolutely builds atmosphere. TV, I get it, you have a limited time to work with, but movies can definitely use it to its advantage. And a 4 hour run of this? I'd definitely watch. Not at the movies, hell no, not without a "let's go out to the lobby" intermission. But home? Absolutely.
7
mrmonster459 Mar 28, 2026 +2
In my experience, most people are their own worst critics. What Lord and Miller considered their "embarrassingly lame" cut could very well have been a masterpiece to everyone else.
2
paultheschmoop Mar 27, 2026 +111
I thought the 3rd act felt a bit rushed and didn’t leave much room for a few moments that should have been super emotional to really linger, so….if the extra stuff is in there, by all means, make a director’s cut! Solid movie on the whole though
111
HankSteakfist Mar 28, 2026 +69
Yeah, the Taumeba breakout and rescuing Rocky was much more gripping in the book because they gave it the time to unfold properly. That whole sequence in the film was less than 10 minutes.
69
BaritBrit Mar 28, 2026 +29
Not to mention that those ten minutes came when the film had already hit you with the emotional climax of the big goodbye scene.
29
psilokan Mar 28, 2026 +7
Instead we got a 15 min scene of karaoke.
7
-Fieldmouse- Mar 28, 2026 +13
Honestly, the whole thing felt rushed to me. I liked the movie but the pacing throughout just felt kind of bizarre. Like there was never really a chance to just breathe and take in the severity of what was happening. 
13
paultheschmoop Mar 28, 2026 +9
The stakes were…..not communicated well in the movie lol
9
Scioptic- Mar 27, 2026 +779
Hopefully that cut will be released at some point for fans to purchase as an alternative to the theatrical cut. Edit: For all those saying the original is great and this longer version wouldn't be needed, or why release a longer cut - I'm not saying this longer alternative cut would be *better*. The reason to release directors or extended cuts is because its *interesting* to see from a filmmakers/storytellers point of view, or just plain fun for fans of the original cut. There are plenty of fantastic films where the theatrical cut is clearly the best, due to pacing etc - that's why it was released as that cut in the first place! But its still fun for fans to see different edits!
779
mikeyfreshh Mar 27, 2026 +327
I'd be surprised if they actually finished the vfx in the 4 hour cut. I'd doubt it's ever released
327
FourEightNineOneOne Mar 27, 2026 +142
They almost certainly didn't, so they'd have to get a budget from Amazon/MGM to finish a Director's cut. And this assumes the Directors actually WANT to release that cut and don't agree it needed to be a lot shorter.
142
geek_of_nature Mar 27, 2026 +23
Yeah a lot of directors don't believe in directors cuts, seeing the one they released in cinemas as being there definitive version.
23
DukeofVermont Mar 27, 2026 +8
I think it depends on if they had final cut or not. The only films that I can think of where the director spoke about wanting a director's cut is when the studio took the film and made major changes against the director's wishes (like Blade Runner).
8
geek_of_nature Mar 27, 2026 +5
Yeah even Peter Jackson said he sees the theatrical cuts of Lord of the Rings as his versions as he had final say. The extended editions were just an added bonus for fans as they had all the extra material.
5
FunkYeahPhotography Mar 27, 2026 +22
Rocky is just a rock for most of this version.
22
Brekldios Mar 27, 2026 +13
All the CGI was left unfinished so every eridian is actually just a straight up real rock that ryan gosling is miming at.
13
FunkYeahPhotography Mar 27, 2026 +5
Ryan just talks to rocks sometimes. He just loves doing that.
5
osmlol Mar 27, 2026 +40
I heard someone on a movie podcast who saw the early screenings that were longer cuts and they said it was without all the cgi and soundtrack so it would probably cost alot to make that cut.
40
Nu11u5 Mar 27, 2026 +27
The "Amaze!" cut.
27
lovesdogsguy Mar 27, 2026 +4
You know they’re going to use that now
4
Movies_Music_Lover Mar 27, 2026 +23
Many movies have longer cuts that never come out. It's business as usual.
23
JohanTravel Mar 27, 2026 +3
I kinda wish that they would just release alternative cuts of movies more often. It makes for a more interesting second viewing
3
FX114 Mar 27, 2026 +4
This was an assembly cut, a very early very rough version of the edit that just contains everything shot with no regard to the bigger picture. Every movie has them, they pretty much never get released.
4
DY357LX Mar 27, 2026 +3
Yeah, if they release a Director's Cut/Special/Extended Edition blu-ray I'd happily buy it.
3
myleftone Mar 27, 2026 +21
The released film is fine. Great, even. This isn’t at all like that DC hack job years back.
21
CrawlerVolteeg Mar 28, 2026 +2
What you said wasn't even remotely confusing...  I completely agree and hope you're correct. 
2
JeannValjean Mar 28, 2026 +1
My wife couldn't understand why I went to all of the LOTR extended edition showings at Alamo last year, especially ROTK. I just said "These editions weren't for you, they were for people who wanted to see more adapted scenes from the book." Release the Antarctica/Sahara cut!
1
ennnuix Mar 27, 2026 +55
I wonder what happened to antarctica in the longer version.
55
StPauliPirate Mar 27, 2026 +76
Too bad they got rid off that sex scene between Ryan and Rocky
76
Able_Contribution407 Mar 27, 2026 +46
Fist my bump!
46
8JHF8 Mar 28, 2026 +21
Amaze! Amaze! Amaze!
21
MurderSheReads Mar 27, 2026 +6
*fist me*
6
jourdan442 Mar 28, 2026 +8
dirty. dirty. dirty.
8
dornwolf Mar 27, 2026 +18
I’d assume a lot of the extra bits is them discussing and implementing the variety of different plans to create more astrophage
18
roto_disc Mar 27, 2026 +254
>“This movie was massive. When we finally got the assembly cut down to under four hours long, we subjected some filmmaker friends of ours to a three hour and 45 minute cut of the movie, which was embarrassing.” Virtually every movie like this has a four hour assembly cut. This isn't f****** news.
254
bfilippe Mar 27, 2026 +83
Bingo, every 2.5 hour movie starts as a 3.5 to 4 hour assembly.
83
sheJaMyMorant Mar 27, 2026 +27
If marvelsgrantman says it is news, it is news
27
FX114 Mar 27, 2026 +20
It is annoying that articles are constantly being released to make it sound like a movie has some longer alternative cut, when they're just talking about the editorial process.
20
roto_disc Mar 27, 2026 +5
Exactly this. Even the top comment right now is: "OMG I WANT THE LONGER CUT". It's f****** clickbait and Variety *knows* it's clickbait, but does it anyway.
5
happy_2_c_u Mar 28, 2026 +3
I wonder if it's a way to gauge interest in a longer cut for streaming/home video.
3
CancelThis2077 Mar 27, 2026 +28
Honestly, it was feeling a little bit long in the last half-hour or so, like it didn't know when to end so that might've been the right call.
28
Taskerst Mar 27, 2026 +5
It’s 90 more minutes of karaoke, isn’t it.
5
TheRealProtozoid Mar 27, 2026 +7
I realize I'm in the minority, but as a sci-fi nerd, a lover of long movies, and an editor, this movie would have been better if it was 10-15 minutes shorter. Even the extended cut of The Martian is five minutes shorter than this, and the extended cut of The Martian is a bit flabby.
7
Hampalam Mar 28, 2026 +1
I don't know that was the consensus from the group I went with too, it was a good film, I enjoyed it, but it spent a lot of time building up dilemmas it almost immediately handwaved away. I don't think I ever thought at any point there was any real jeopardy for anyone.
1
gandraw Mar 27, 2026 +71
The movie really only reinforced my opinion that book adaptations need a 6-8 episode miniseries. Otherwise you can't avoid speedrunning the plot.
71
Pjoernrachzarck Mar 27, 2026 +24
This is such a misguided take. There are things only a movie can do. Taking you on an incredible journey in one night, in one sitting, is a value that often, if not always, supersedes the mere act of illustrating a book chapter by chapter. A good screenwriter can take three chapters of a novel and convey everything that matters in these chapters into a single wordless scene. Many of the most highly acclaimed movies of all time are adaptations from books that never even attempted to just illustrate the page, but to find out what it is about this book/story that speaks to the audience, and then to deliver that thing as a high-intensity beam of radiation straight from the theatre screen into the audiences souls in a single night. *That* is the ideal that novel adaptations should strife for. Not a checklist of visiting every plot point, even if it means the television treatment. I don’t want to casually sit down once a week to see the latest pictures of my favorite chapters of Jurassic Park. I want to be introduced to Isla Nubla and get to it and be in peril there and then sit in the helicopter home in one stretch of 2 hours that make me forget I even exist. Project Hail Mary is best as a 2h movie. Not a 4h movie and not a ten-part television show. In fact, the edit that got released is still a little too long.
24
AdelesBoyfriend Mar 27, 2026 +11
It's so rare to get high budget, literary adaptations for television I think. I know there's *The Three-Body Problem* and *100 Years of Solitude* but other platforms besides Netflix do not seem to make them.
11
alral1988 Mar 27, 2026 +11
The Stand, The Outsider, Dexter, Witcher, Game of Thrones, Shogun, Wheel of Time, Handmaid’s Tale, Justified, Bosch, and The Walking Dead just to name a few. I think it’s more rare that a tv show ISN’T based on a book
11
PeterNippelstein Mar 27, 2026 +60
Dear god, even the final cut felt very long to me
60
ass101 Mar 27, 2026 +26
It flew by for me,
26
Splinterman11 Mar 28, 2026 +12
As a book reader yeah the pacing was way too quick in some parts.
12
overtired27 Mar 27, 2026 +19
Agree. I do wonder if there was more substance in certain parts they cut though. The film felt like all the cutesy stuff was left in and chunks of plot were skimmed over. Also, did we need so much of the Harry Styles karaoke scene? Apparently some people found it moving. Felt bizarre to me.
19
blazeofgloreee Mar 27, 2026 +8
I could have done without that scene entirely. It felt forced even within the quirkiness of the rest of the movie. They definitely leaned hard into the wacky charm and banter scenes. Felt like the only scenes not trying to make you laugh were trying to make you cry, with almost nothing in between. I liked the movie overall but I could have used some more technical/plot exposition scenes at the expense of some of the constant jokey banter. 
8
AcreaRising4 Mar 27, 2026 +18
There was really nothing joking or quirky about that scene? I found it to be rather haunting and kind of emotional.
18
Typical-Blackberry-3 Mar 27, 2026 +15
I loved the scene. Great addition to the adaptation. And it's only 2 and a half minutes...
15
blazeofgloreee Mar 27, 2026 +4
Yes that was one of the try to make you cry scenes 
4
FluffySloth27 Mar 28, 2026 +1
Mhm. It felt closer to Guardians of the Galaxy than The Martian.
1
WoodyMellow Mar 27, 2026 +6
How is this a story? This is pretty standard practice during the editing process. Most assembly cuts are no where near final running time and getting input from others is pretty normal.
6
rocketmonkee Mar 28, 2026 +2
> How is this a story? Because the movie has been out for a week, and the PR machine needs to give it some additional attention to give it some extra life.
2
eeeBs Mar 27, 2026 +7
# RELEASE THE HAIL MARY SUPERCUT
7
monchikun Mar 27, 2026 +22
Now I want the 4 hour cut
22
SaveUsCatman Mar 27, 2026 +5
Count me in.
5
MusclyArmPaperboy Mar 27, 2026 +7
I heard the longer version included a backstory for Grace with a love interest, but that was scrapped. It made more sense to make him a loner.
7
8JHF8 Mar 28, 2026 +5
Yeah, that would be out of place. He needs to be a loner to be able to thrive in these scenarios.
5
james2183 Mar 27, 2026 +4
#ReleaseTheRockyCut
4
EchoBay Mar 27, 2026 +7
To me it was the best movie this year, so what did release was good enough. It would be fun to go and watch a longer cut though at home. I don't know anything about the book, but it sounds like based off the comments there were a lot of things cut out.
7
Sparktank1 Mar 27, 2026 +2
A lot of movies start out this long. We're usually better off with it getting edited versions. I remember some commentaries, the director always goes off and giggles to himself how much he loves some f****** actor and wishes he could add more screentime of them just being themselves. They really get carried away with the money and power they have that they lose sight of their vision. We got a longer cut of Napoleon and it was no Kingdom of Heaven.
2
APartyInMyPants Mar 27, 2026 +2
Duh. I mean this is always how it is. The first cut is always insanely fat with scenes that are too bloated, and scenes that are unnecessary. The “director’s cut” doesn’t always mean it’s a superior version.
2
nowhereman136 Mar 27, 2026 +2
Movies in theaters should be under 3 hours. Any longer and it needs to be broken up into multiple movies or a TV miniseries. Either option makes the finances of the project way more complicated. PHM is 159 minutes, which is that sweet spot. It never feels like it's trying to pad out the story or rushing to cram everything in. The pacing is done very well to keep everything flowing and provides a satisfying ending. That being said, I would still love to see an extended cut get released eventually. If the directors think this cut is better than the theatrical cut, then I wanna see it. I get it wouldnt get a wide release but maybe a limited release. At least released on home media. Extended cuts don't need to replace theatrical cuts, but would be a nice complementary piece for fans
2
LogicalRepeat3622 Mar 28, 2026 +1
Am I dumb? Turn it into a four episode mini series on Netflix and cash in.
1
connect1994 Mar 27, 2026 +7
Loved the movie but it still felt too long
7