· 140 comments · Save ·
Questions & Help Mar 18, 2026 at 7:57 PM

QatarEnergy reports 'extensive damage' after missile attacks on Ras Laffan industrial city

Posted by mmccxi


https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/qatarenergy-reports-extensive-damage-after-missile-attacks-ras-laffan-industrial-2026-03-18/

🚩 Report this post

140 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
notthemamaa Mar 18, 2026 +445
So last week there were a lot of articles about various gulf states (including Qatar) using up their US-made interceptor missiles. Now we're seeing stories about Iranian missiles and drones getting through. Trying to connect the dots here...
445
jeffersonianMI Mar 18, 2026 +227
Iranian gas fields were hit last night by Israel. So this might also be tit-for-tat. 
227
margotsaidso Mar 18, 2026 +150
It's interesting, because Israel claims those were coordinated with the US, however CNN is reporting some US officials claim we had nothing to do with it. Wouldn't be the first time Israel did something like that.
150
2CommaNoob Mar 18, 2026 +86
Yeah, so many mixed messages from the US and Israel. I’m starting to believe the Iranians information more than trumps/israels. I’m how many times did we win already? Thought the surrendered 3 times already? I thought we destroyed all their domes and missiles? Destroyed all their ships and subs? How many times have the Strait been open? Yet, facts are: Iran still blowing things up, few ships crossing, and they haven’t surrendered, Netanyahu has not been seen in public Hmmm. One side is covering up a ton more than the other side.
86
AdvancedAd7068 Mar 18, 2026 +9
Israeli jets had to fly through multiple airspaces just to reach this area, of course US and Saudi were aware of this.
9
jeffersonianMI Mar 18, 2026 +23
True, but both can be incredibly dishonest.  Its not a zero sum game. 
23
progrethth Mar 18, 2026 +22
> Yeah, so many mixed messages from the US and Israel. I’m starting to believe the Iranians information more than trumps/israels. You probably shouldn't. All three countries involved have a long history of lies.
22
2CommaNoob Mar 18, 2026 +28
It's true, they are all lying but I definitely don't believe Trumps extreme one sided statements. The only things we have to go on is: Strait is still close, Iran still shooting, and oil prices up.
28
NorysStorys Mar 19, 2026 +6
Basically if the Brits, French, Chinese and Germans confirm something it’s probably true. If it’s not verified by 3 of those 4, it’s anyone’s guess whether it’s the US or Israel.
6
2CommaNoob Mar 19, 2026 +6
Yup. Also, I also believe if the country confirms their own is dead too lol. Like Iran confirming the intelligence dude got wacked.
6
NorysStorys Mar 19, 2026 +5
Yeah self-verification is also valid but even then, they could claim someone’s dead in order to protect them from being targeted, it’s bit tin-foil hat wearing but it is a valid tactic.
5
thetransportedman Mar 18, 2026 +22
The US is just an extension of Israel
22
Alt_Restorer Mar 18, 2026 +4
I think it's the other way around, but to each their own. Israel is still my least favorite US state.
4
NorysStorys Mar 19, 2026 +18
The US behaves far more like a loyal vassal than Israel does.
18
AdvancedAd7068 Mar 18, 2026 -19
As an Israeli, it's actually the other way around. Also, you're welcome for being your "boots on the ground" in the Middle East.
-19
thetransportedman Mar 18, 2026 +12
Our famously MAGA conservative counterterrorism director just resigned saying we only went in on Iran because of Israeli influence. We have anti-BDS laws that make it illegal for states to hire companies that boycott Israel. And pro Palestinian protests are labeled as terroristic activity now. And senator Lindsay Graham even said Israel first. So, no. Israel has deep investments rooted into our country unlike any other country and seems to be calling some of the geopolitical shots. And I'm sick of throwing endless money and US lives at the middle east to hope to promote stability solely to make gas prices cheaper, when Israel clearly has enough resources to be its own independent nation without sending $4B in aid on top of the tens of billions in war spending we've done since 2023
12
red-dusk99 Mar 18, 2026 +8
Extremely brazen tail wagging dog behaviour here.
8
AdvancedAd7068 Mar 18, 2026 -4
Ok? Both Lebanon and Israel were created by these larger nations post WW2, it was never an independent entity despite Israeli government. Israeli government is based on a Parliamentary system adopted from England. The entire Occupied Mandate of Palestine was owned by England and mediated by Jordan, Egypt, and Syria (until 1948). Prior to that it was part of the Ottomon empire. Lebanon was occupied by the French, who actually drew the borders alongside Syria. You can say one sentence, at least know the history. The Middle East has been a cluster of abuse by world powers forever, yet one gets 90% of the blame while others are “justified”. To this point, AIPAC isn’t even close to the largest donor group in America. This is just an affect of people targeting what they feel is Israeli or Jewish (doesn’t matter to them) interest and singling it out as if everyone else isn’t playing the same game.
-4
red-dusk99 Mar 18, 2026 +2
Thanks for confirming the tail part.
2
DrawDiscardDredge Mar 19, 2026 +1
You just spouted a bunch of what could be ancient history at this point. The fact is, the US provides billions of dollars in military arms to Israel in support of their genocidal war against Palestine, most recently in leveling Gaza. Pretty much every politician in the states especially in the current admin constantly wax poetic about, “protecting Israel,” even if it the strongest military in the region by a kilometer. Like pretty much every country in the world, votes year after year in the UN condemning the genocidal and imperialistic nature of Israel while the US doesn’t. The US is providing a providing a majority of the military actions in this current Iran war. The gulf war was fought for Israel when they were the aggressors, the 2006 lebanon war was fought for Israel when they were the aggressors. It goes on and on. The US is Israel’s b****.
1
AdvancedAd7068 Mar 20, 2026
Ah, good venting, did you get it out of your system?
0
DrawDiscardDredge Mar 20, 2026 +1
Lmao, whatever troll.
1
HEAT-FS Mar 19, 2026 +1
As an American, it would be like me shooting at Canadians and being like “hey israel, you’re welcome for me being your boots on the ground in North America.”
1
AdvancedAd7068 Mar 19, 2026
Yeah not even close to the same scenario but nice analogy I guess?
0
HEAT-FS Mar 19, 2026
Actually it's the perfect scenario, you just have no retort
0
NorysStorys Mar 19, 2026 +3
I mean both the US and Israeli’s regularly lie at this point so you can’t really use anything either say reliably.
3
hoppertn Mar 18, 2026 +8
Israel is the Middle East’s Steve Urkel, “Did I do thaaaaaaaaaaaaat?”
8
denied_eXeal Mar 19, 2026 +3
You don’t need enemies with allies like Israel
3
Timely_Influence8392 Mar 18, 2026 +8
Israel can accurately claim it was coordinated with the US Government because the Israeli Government *is* the US Government. Israel passing the US information is just Netanyahu passing a post it note from one hand to another.
8
Critical_Opening_526 Mar 18, 2026 +4
I thought they were the good guys?
4
Indercarnive Mar 19, 2026 +5
Iran literally said they would strike US-allied country's energy production if Iran's energy production was targeted. Israel then decides to his Iran's gas fields.
5
jeffersonianMI Mar 19, 2026 +1
Now if it ever happens again Tump's implying (by tweet) that we're going to nuke the gas field. Genius. Probably they'll back down now... or... WW3?
1
PapaSheev7 Mar 19, 2026
Except Iran targeted GCC energy infrastructure first with their strikes on Saudi oil fields at the start of the month. Israel struck back a week or so later hitting Iranian oil infrastructure(which supposedly pissed Trump off at the time).
0
Optimal-Golf-8270 Mar 18, 2026 +11
It is. Israel is happy to see the region burn. They know if Iran is hit, they are forced to escalate. Israel and Iran are the only rational parties in this war. Everyone else is f****** insane. How the GSCs thought this could possibly end well for them I just don't understand.
11
jeffersonianMI Mar 18, 2026 -1
Unless things move insanely fast, I assume Iran will get a bomb. Dirty bombs are already within their ability.  This whole thing is a tragedy.
-1
Optimal-Golf-8270 Mar 18, 2026 +6
They don't/didn't want a bomb, definitely not dirty. It doesn't help them.
6
Drak_is_Right Mar 18, 2026 +1
They cannot quickly get a bomb. Certainly not in a war.
1
Marcus_Aurelius71 Mar 18, 2026 +1
They could launch their 60% enriched uranium. All they need is to cause damage. But they won't, since they lost their only powerful asset.
1
Drak_is_Right Mar 18, 2026 +3
They wouldnt do anything with the uranium. They will hide it for the future or as a bargaining chip. Something like cobalt would cause far greater impact than Uranium. Lots of nasty isotopes with sub 100 year half life they could use.
3
jeffersonianMI Mar 18, 2026 -1
OK.  I guess its settled then. 
-1
Drak_is_Right Mar 18, 2026 +1
Dirty.bombs are possible. You are right on that. They likely wouldnt use Uranium though but something that emits more radiation. They could probably launch one this week if they wanted to.
1
jeffersonianMI Mar 18, 2026
The Irania nuclear plant took a hit 350m away according to Iranian/Russian state news.  Probably posturing. Very serious.  
0
EmbarrassedW33B Mar 18, 2026 +42
The missiles are one thing, but jesus f****** Christ the drones....The entire world has watched Russia and Ukraine use drones - the former using many made and designed by Iran - to reshape the battlefield for the last 4 years. And these have been by and large incredibly c**** weapons that deal as much or far more damage than vastly more expensive traditional missiles and such. Both Russia and Ukraine have likewise developed many means to counter those drones in as cost effective a manner as possible. Its pretty f****** funny that so many countries just kinda went "neat" and then didn't change a god damned thing about their defense apparatus to account for this new weapon system. Did they even wargame out any of these scenarios, try and make an intelligent assesment of Iran's stockpiles, or of their own even??? Absolutely bonkers all around. 
42
Shot-Possibility-399 Mar 18, 2026 +16
It's Trump, you think there was a plan at all lol?! You can thank republicans for ruining our government and not letting anything positive happen for our country. Trump all but left Ukraine out to dry, the country that has been fighting friend like these for years now. Biden would have kept helping them and used their intel to redesign our own defense but noooo
16
progrethth Mar 18, 2026 +8
Iran did. They started producing a lot of drones. They are just not good at it as Russia or Ukraine.
8
nricciar Mar 18, 2026 +3
I think that is yet to be determined. Iran and Russia have differing goals. Iran does not have to send 100s of drones a night at something to keep the straights closed. I’m not saying you’re wrong either though.
3
Marcus_Aurelius71 Mar 18, 2026 +5
I think they do send 100s. Air defense targets them. Missiles come in after.
5
Moikanyoloko Mar 18, 2026 +3
Military procurement is slow during peacetime, many projects take decades to come to fruition, and this would also require a doctrine change, probably. Outside of Russia/Ukraine no industrialized country spent the last 4 years anywhere near a war footing, the closest were Iran/Israel, but Iran already adapted to drone warfare beforehand and had pretty unreliable air defenses, and I'm utterly uncertain about Israel because there's not a lot of reliable information about how they're handling things.
3
Fateor42 Mar 18, 2026 +1
The US military absolutely did, they just don't have those systems around Iran because
1
rajastrums_1 Mar 18, 2026 +58
All dots lead to Trump's empty skull.
58
NotUniqueWorkAccount Mar 18, 2026 +12
I thought all the dots led to the Unredacted Trump Epstein Files.  But what do I know, I'm just a poor.
12
robustofilth Mar 18, 2026 +6
It’s simple. They used lots of old missiles first knowing they’ll be shot down and use up interceptors. Now they’re using the better stuff.
6
pass_nthru Mar 19, 2026 +1
it’s two dots
1
Ein_grosser_Nerd Mar 19, 2026 +1
The biggest tell is that the DoD just requested an additional $200 billion from congress, mostly to increase production of interceptors
1
RobutNotRobot Mar 19, 2026 +1
This scenario also played out with Israel in....June 2025. Ancient history. It's no surprise that the lesson couldn't be remembered.
1
Kaiisim Mar 19, 2026 +1
Also not long since American oil companies told Trump they wont invest in Venezuelan oil for him while the oil price is low. And then suddenly he did something to make the price spike!! Wow wonder why
1
rje946 Mar 18, 2026
Biden did it.
0
Theduckisback Mar 18, 2026 +48
Forever war in the middle east IV looks like a real peach
48
rTpure Mar 18, 2026 +355
how can Iran's military, which has been 100% obliterated multiple times according to Trump, still be capable of successfully launching missile strikes
355
Coherent_Tangent Mar 18, 2026 +52
I thought they were absolutely decimated, which would mean 90% is still intact.
52
hoppertn Mar 18, 2026 +26
Thank you for being a stickler to the true meaning of decimated, I appreciate you internet stranger.
26
Shot-Possibility-399 Mar 19, 2026 -1
Except it has not meant that in modern usage for quite some time 
-1
mstrbwl Mar 18, 2026 +140
Careful, Trump says talking like that is treason now. -10,000 Palantir social credit points for you!
140
thetransportedman Mar 18, 2026 +28
Republican credits are no good here!
28
muchawesomemyron Mar 19, 2026 +2
User rTpure will now be 100% selected in random screenings by the TSA... in airports that haven't closed down yet.
2
smurfsundermybed Mar 18, 2026 +19
It's amazing what can be accomplished with no boats and no missiles. Just sheer willpower I guess.
19
GovernorHarryLogan Mar 18, 2026 +5
Iran recruited Jean Grey. Gg no re donald
5
HMTMKMKM95 Mar 18, 2026 +2
They're doing it using the power of family. No, really. The US and Israel have knocked many family members of the new boss in Iran, amongst others. That is going to be a drivong force.
2
Chuckieshere Mar 18, 2026 +1
Through god all things are possible so jot that down
1
Xeynon Mar 18, 2026 +5
The Iranians are apparently very good at de-obliterating their military.
5
jcpopm Mar 18, 2026 +4
Well you see in his brain you can destroy things 500% just like you can reduce drug prices 500%. So we aren't quite there yet.
4
Sky_Zaddy Mar 18, 2026 +5
Because its AI and fake news!
5
mmccxi Mar 18, 2026 +8
Iran has a a friend Army from Canada, they met at Niagara Falls, you wouldn't know them.
8
riko77can Mar 19, 2026 +2
Not just that… they also provided hours of advance notice and *still* managed to hit it without being intercepted.
2
Shot-Possibility-399 Mar 18, 2026 +1
For those wondering, Iran is extremely mountainous, especially around the coast, and has spent 50 year digging underground tunnels and bunkers for this exact scenario. Thats why it's like this.
1
runningraleigh Mar 18, 2026 +2
I’m sure the US has blown up 90% of the targets they knew about. Which I bet was half of them at most. Modern satellite imagery didn’t even exist when they started building all the bunkers.
2
Protean_Protein Mar 18, 2026 -19
That was never the actual claim, though. Obviously even with significant reduction in viable military locations within Iran, that doesn’t imply no missile attacks are possible. The US seemed to be focusing mostly on nuclear sites, with Israel focused on the that and the threat to it. I don’t support the way this has gone done, and certainly don’t support Trump, but I don’t think it does much good to engage in smarminess when these Gulf states are and always were strategic partners in the proxy conflict against Russia and Iran (as proxy for Russia, and the smaller states and militias as proxies for it, against Saudi Arabia).
-19
rTpure Mar 18, 2026 +15
>That was never the actual claim, though.  *"We have already destroyed 100% of Iran’s Military capability"* *- Donald J. Trump, March 14th 2026*
15
hoppertn Mar 18, 2026 +2
Look we know the guy is bad with numbers, he bankrupted a c*****.
2
Protean_Protein Mar 18, 2026 -10
Yes, I know Trump says dumb and false shit. The implicature of “actual” was what actual analysts were reporting.
-10
_ECMO_ Mar 18, 2026 +4
The whole comment you replied to was about Trump. Obviously everyone with even just a half of brain new that it‘s false.
4
Protean_Protein Mar 18, 2026 -1
My point was that Trump is an idiot salesperson, not the person you get the actual data from.
-1
Girthw0rm Mar 18, 2026 +1
I’m not a military strategic genius or anything but maybe the Commander in Chief might make sure you’re not going it alone and shore up your allies’ defenses of critical infrastructure *before* starting a war?
1
DangerBay2015 Mar 18, 2026 +3
That wouldn’t have worked because giving the US time to plan and strategize wouldn’t have let Israel dog walk Trump into war.
3
Drak_is_Right Mar 18, 2026 -7
Imagine a 500,000 piece shell game. Under 20,000 are military assets The big ones that cant be hidden under a shell well are obviously destroyed. The rest...only some. US is real good at watching the shells but there are a lot of shells. And some schools under those shells
-7
Shot-Possibility-399 Mar 18, 2026 +2
Do not try to post ad hoc justify kegsbreath killing 150+ little girls 
2
Drak_is_Right Mar 18, 2026 -3
I am not trying to justify.
-3
mmccxi Mar 18, 2026 +102
I can only imagine what this will do to energy prices while we are already battling inflation.
102
SpiderSlitScrotums Mar 18, 2026 +75
Brent crude oil just hit $110. Thankfully this only affects people who have lived after the Industrial Revolution. If you are currently living in 300 BC, you should be fine.
75
progrethth Mar 18, 2026 +11
if you are living on North Sentinel Island you should be fine too. Maybe slightly fewer useful things washing ashore.
11
Alt_Restorer Mar 18, 2026 +3
At least those of us who saw this coming and transitioned to synthetic fuel won't be affected. /s
3
Eastern-Hamster-5050 Mar 18, 2026 +3
Even the Amish are fucked
3
denied_eXeal Mar 19, 2026 +1
I live in 299 BC, gdi I always lose out 
1
Extension_Pin_6359 Mar 18, 2026 +16
I'm going to go out on a limb and predict they will go up.
16
Drak_is_Right Mar 18, 2026 +2
LNG.and oil prices are not moving quite in sync I expect.one to freak out far more than the other.
2
ADDLugh Mar 18, 2026 +3
Coming to an electricity bill near you! Considering this is a natural gas refinery.
3
Drak_is_Right Mar 18, 2026 +4
Likely not anytime soon if in the US. Lot of longterm contracts and US exports a ton. Now Japan, India, China, etc....let's just say coal exports are surging.
4
Xeynon Mar 18, 2026 +57
This is the largest LNG export facility in the world. If it's offline for a substantial period the economic consequences are going to be severe and long-lasting.
57
duggatron Mar 18, 2026 +13
And it'll cost a few million in drones and missiles to damage it again when they fix it.
13
CiaphasCain8849 Mar 19, 2026 +5
Their "one-way" drones are only like $35,000 each.
5
superknight333 Mar 19, 2026 +3
7000 actually
3
denied_eXeal Mar 19, 2026 +8
This shit just convinced me to put solar panels on my roof. F*** our leaders bro wtf
8
stresskillingme Mar 19, 2026 +1
Than you for your attention to this matter
1
AudibleNod Mar 18, 2026 +88
Ras Laffan is responsible for about 83% of Qatar's hydrocarbon revenue. In 2025 Qatar netted around 43 billion dollars in revenue. Meaning $35B ran through Ras Laffan last year. Put another way; if the damage is severe, [Qatar could lose 86 Boeing 747-8 jumbo jets](https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/qatar-gifting-trump-400m-luxury-jet-raises-ethical-and-legal-concerns) worth of oil/gas revenue to this Epstein distraction fiasco. With friends like these....
88
TotalEmployment9996 Mar 18, 2026 +19
Thanks I always wanted to know how many jumbo jets $35B was worth
19
JohnHwagi Mar 19, 2026 +1
How many jumbo jets are in your 401k? Are you saving enough jumbo jets each paycheck?
1
NotObviouslyARobot Mar 19, 2026 +3
In May 2025, the Trump administration announced plans to accept a Boeing 747-8 "luxury jet" as a gift from the Qatari royal family for use as a temporary Air Force One.
3
muchawesomemyron Mar 19, 2026 +2
I think you need to also provide an estimate of how many football fields that is worth for the ones who voted for Trump.
2
fxkatt Mar 18, 2026 +69
>*Iran earlier issued an evacuation warning for several oil facilities across Saudi Arabia, ​the UAE, and Qatar, including the Ras Laffan ​Refinery...* Iran is showing its hand, and their US armed neighbors still can't counter these missiles (those that are supposed to be exhausted)
69
Gastroid Mar 18, 2026 +68
The US *could* reasonably counter most of those missiles, but that would mean the Navy Destroyers sitting a thousand miles out in the Gulf would need to put themselves in harm's way to do it. And if a USN ship was lost to Iranian drones or missiles, the political fallout could be enormous. At the same time, if the US is unable to defend its Gulf allies in the conflict it instigated, the political fallout could be enormous. It's almost like there's a reason no President wanted to escalate the Iranian conflict...
68
Shot-Possibility-399 Mar 18, 2026 +9
But would also spend out the ass to shoot them down since we haven't invested in c**** anti drone capabilities 
9
-burnr- Mar 18, 2026 +7
"Now who has the cards b****" - Zelensky probably
7
_Answer_42 Mar 18, 2026 +2
Missile hits not drone, some are hard to intercept even with the costly available defenses
2
r3dditr0x Mar 18, 2026 +56
Wait til we run out of anti-drone missiles in the next week or two; Iran is gonna set the whole region on fire. And we better move those ships. This war was a mistake and is terrible for literally everyone except Netanyahu, who is using the opportunity to...of course...steal more land in Lebanon.
56
martapap Mar 18, 2026 +21
Iran is waiting for those marines to get there from the pacific theater before unloading. I swear this is the worst timeline. 
21
jeffersonianMI Mar 18, 2026 -2
That was interesting.   Surely they're about to surrender. 
-2
ZonaDesertRat Mar 18, 2026 +14
We just winning too much, that's the problem. We need to win less, to keep winning more. I mean, the DOW! 
14
OvenIcy8646 Mar 18, 2026 +6
Seems like a good time to start looking at electric
6
Battleneter Mar 18, 2026 +9
Not Tesla, CEO is both a Natzi and Trump supporter.
9
OvenIcy8646 Mar 19, 2026 +1
Ugh no way !! there are more options than a few years ago
1
mapletree23 Mar 18, 2026 +15
if iran still has most of their drone production sites up and running somewhere it's going to be an issue for sure, they've been churning that shit out for years now for russia so they're probably very efficient about it at this point the US straight up didn't have the logistics in place for this seemingly and it's going to be ridiculously taxing trying to move stuff over guess we'll just have to wait and see how iran's production lines look, if they're good i imagine the US and israel will have no choice but to pull back or risk a very long and costly war especially if they just can't defend anything reliably once all the anti-air runs out
15
dontslambro Mar 18, 2026 +22
It’s called a quagmire. Basically the US is flirting with another forever conflict.
22
Healthy_Razzmatazz38 Mar 18, 2026 +18
its already a forever conflict, if the us quits now and leaves do you think the guy they blew off a couple limbs of and murdered his family is going to just decide to say whatever?
18
mmccxi Mar 18, 2026 +9
Fortunately Trump is putting an end to all future sustainable energy production, which will only make his buddies richer
9
Chimvape Mar 19, 2026 +8
The LNG disruption is gonna hit the EU hard. If I'm not mistaken it supplies around 45% of their supply. Iran attacked them for aligning with the Pedo cheeto who had ZERO reason to attack Iran. The zionists are attacking Lebanon while getting their shit pushed in by Iranian missiles and drones and crying for sympathy despite the fact that the ENTIRE WORLD watched as they cheered on the genocide they committed on Palestine. Help me out folks, what did i leave out?
8
give_me_coin Mar 19, 2026 +1
You are mistaken. +80% of Europe's energy imports do not come from the Persian Gulf. Most LNG in Europe comes from USA and Norway. There is little risk of supply shock in Europe or USA from this war. However, we will still feel price effect and inflation.
1
SemicolonMIA Mar 18, 2026 +7
Trump fucked ya, thanks for the Jet tho ig
7
Sedert1882 Mar 18, 2026 +3
This war lurches from disaster to disaster. Well done, everyone.
3
Indercarnive Mar 19, 2026 +2
I can't believe Iran did what they said they'd do. Don't they know they're supposed to let Israel just do whatever it wants to them?
2
Informal-String6064 Mar 19, 2026 +1
Almost like Trump was talking shit about having won
1
RobutNotRobot Mar 19, 2026 +1
A reminder that natural gas is highly explosive.
1
WeakCartographer7826 Mar 18, 2026 +2
We are so fucked Also, at what point does something become a world war? Because it sure seems like most of the world is involved in this.
2
Dudersaurus Mar 18, 2026 +12
Most of the world, except most of Asia, Africa, South America, Europe and Oceania.
12
Gakojuro1 Mar 20, 2026 +1
But it affect all over the world, this war is cause oil gas price more expensive and drag everything up foods, stuff even human services in my coutry I live in vietnam
1
Dudersaurus Mar 20, 2026 +1
Geopolitical and trade fallout that has a widespread effect doesn't equal a world war.
1
WeakCartographer7826 Mar 19, 2026
For now
0
AdvancedAd7068 Mar 18, 2026 +2
Take a deep breath.... even this comment sounds manic and it's in an online forum
2
WeakCartographer7826 Mar 18, 2026
I'm good thanks. We are fucked
0
Boundish91 Mar 18, 2026
I'm sure US allies in the middle east are mildly pissed off with Trump now.
0
Pizzas_Coke Mar 18, 2026
Qatar declares Iran's military and security attachés persona non grata, orders them to leave the country within 24 hours
0
← Back to Board