· 20 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events May 6, 2026 at 6:45 AM

Rachel Reeves and Scott Bessent argued in person about Iran war, sources say

Posted by ShadowNelumbo


Rachel Reeves and Scott Bessent argued in person about Iran war, sources say
the Guardian
Rachel Reeves and Scott Bessent argued in person about Iran war, sources say
UK chancellor said to have told US treasury secretary she did not like his tone during meeting in Washington in April

🚩 Report this post

20 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
Oreos_Are_Anabolic May 6, 2026 +46
> Reeves told the Mirror on 14 April she felt “very frustrated and angry that the US went into this war without a clear exit plan”, calling the war a “folly”. > She then travelled to the US, where she told CNBC the goals of the war had “never been clear”. > “I’m not convinced this conflict has made the world a safer place,” Reeves told a panel organised by the US broadcaster. “It’s not been clear over the last six weeks what exactly the aim of this conflict is.” > According to those briefed on her meetings, Bessent upbraided her over the comments during an in-person meeting on 15 April, including invoking the threat of an Iranian nuclear attack on Britain. > He is understood to have made comments along the lines of those he made to the BBC a day earlier, when he responded to concerns about the war’s economic fallout by saying: “I wonder what the hit to global GDP would be if a nuclear weapon hit London.” > Reeves responded by telling the treasury secretary she was not his employee and did not like his tone. >One UK official said: “Reeves was as direct in private with Bessent about her views on the Iran [war] as she was in public.”
46
Mysterious-Prompt212 May 6, 2026 +23
“I wonder what the hit to global GDP would be if a nuclear weapon hit London.” FYI Bessent - Iran has zero capability or desire to nuke London. You idiots are making shit up to cover your marching orders from Putin.
23
ElCaminoInTheWest May 6, 2026 +6
'the US went into this war without a clear exit plan”, calling the war a “folly”...She then travelled to the US, where she told CNBC the goals of the war had “never been clear” ' This much is just straight inarguable fact.
6
BrofessorFarnsworth May 6, 2026 +127
Well in full honesty, more people need to be telling Scott Bessent to his face that he is the stupidest m*********** in the history of our species.
127
--redacted-- May 6, 2026 +51
He's amongst some pretty stiff competition.
51
ghostbannomore May 6, 2026 +25
The Harlem globetrotters of dumb motherfuckers.
25
ohell May 6, 2026 +6
More people might have told him this. But need to wait for a good moment to make public, like just before an important local election day 😀
6
Zolomun May 6, 2026 +8
Also, somehow, one of the most smug. He seems to be constantly be literally looking down his nose at the entire world.
8
timoumd May 6, 2026 +2
Didn't he get in a fight with Elon?
2
NoxInfernus May 6, 2026 +3
And ‘allegedly’ punched him in the eye. But remember, one just act does not excuse a lifetime of being a d***** canoe.
3
Ok_Lettuce_7939 May 6, 2026 +32
Hopefully the UK, EU countries, and the ANZAC countries declare all Trump Administration officials persona non grata when practicable. Would love to see Bessent's face when he can no longer travel to France, Germany, Australia, Canada, etc etc
32
RandomStuffGenerator May 6, 2026 +3
Given their audience, I imagine it would be pretty easy for them to spin it into "we are the ones not wanting to go visit"
3
RebelliousInNature May 6, 2026 +26
He is really just a greedy financier. Who gives af what his musings on global peace are. Iran don’t have nukes Iran aren’t threatening London YOU are, Scott. You’re the terrorist. Greedy android slimy f***
26
ShakeMyHeadSadly May 6, 2026 +8
Scott Bessent is such a smug POS. He's perfect for this Administration.
8
Prior_Industry May 6, 2026 +5
Hopefully Bessants didn't attempt to swing at Reeves...
5
Tunggall May 6, 2026 +6
He’d get his arse walloped by her in a jiffy.
6
Flash_ina_pan May 6, 2026 +5
There is a mountain of evidence that Scotty doesn't know shit.
5
bruxaakelarre May 6, 2026 +3
“It’s not been clear over the last six weeks what exactly the aim of this conflict is.” To run cover for the Epstein files.
3
artcopywriter May 6, 2026 -6
Yeah, because Reeves has never gone into *anything* without a clear cut plan…Perhaps the biggest imbecile ever involved in British politics. (And that’s saying something.)
-6
chodgson625 6 days ago +1
And yet she’s lasted longer and done far less damage than Lettuce Liz Truss
1
← Back to Board