· 173 comments · Save ·
For Sale Apr 17, 2026 at 10:19 AM

Reese Witherspoon told fans to learn A.I., authors are slamming her

Posted by Abject-Pick-6472


Authors are slamming Reese Witherspoon for telling followers 'it's time to learn AI'
Los Angeles Times
Authors are slamming Reese Witherspoon for telling followers 'it's time to learn AI'
Reese Witherspoon has long championed the creative community, but a recent social media post hyping artificial intelligence isn't sitting well with writers and authors.

🚩 Report this post

173 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
iamacannibal 2 days ago +195
But will they stop working with her? She has a book club podcast and works with authors to promote their books basically in exchange for the rights to make them into movies and tv shows with her own production company.
195
neverinallmylife 2 days ago +64
unbelievable she has a book club and is promoting AI
64
String-Tree 2 days ago +82
Why is that unbelievable? She doesn't care about books as art, she cares about books as potential film scripts which she can profit off of.
82
tyleritis 2 days ago +18
Yup. Books are a moneymaking product to her. And she was able to sell that production company
18
neverinallmylife 2 days ago +13
Ummm I thought book clubs were about the joy of reading and celebrating writers
13
Throwaway392308 2 days ago +24
Have you met capitalism? There is no joy, only the soulless pursuit of ever more capital.
24
neverinallmylife 2 days ago +5
I met her but she was just as soulless as Reese.
5
Briscotti 1 day ago +3
The book club only exists as a way for her to option IP for film and television projects.
3
Blue_Waffle_Brunch 1 day ago +1
She's in business. She doesn't care about the content of the books, only the profit she can make.
1
Secret-Put-4525 19 hr ago +1
I wonder if practical effects artists made such a stink when cgi started coming for them.
1
Sea-Present-8543 2 days ago +12
Wait, is this for real, or just from the Younger script?
12
iamacannibal 2 days ago +43
Her company has made a few tv shows and movies from books in her book club. One of the things she does with the company is get early access to the books for her book club and has first choice for the adaptation rights to it since she is one of the first to read it. A lot of the authors agree since it will get on her podcast which essentially guarantees at least 10,000 copies sold since none of the books featured on there have sold less than that. She did sell the production company and hasn't adapted anything in a few years but she is still involved in the company so I wouldn't be surprised if she is still doing it just not as the face of the production company now
43
Dorkinfo 2 days ago +8
lol, they were referencing a real thing. Like if it were 20 years before it would’ve been Oprah.
8
cokeplusmentos 2 days ago +244
Where did they slam her? Like on the floor stone cold style?
244
ChunkdarTheFair 2 days ago +64
Oh my god is she okay?!
64
Horror_Response_1991 2 days ago +29
Yeah she still kicked out at 2
29
SharkSymphony 2 days ago +18
AS GAWD IS MY WITNESS SHE IS BROKEN IN HALF.
18
JoshHartsMilkMustach 2 days ago +18
It was a **BLISTERING TAKEDOWN**
18
ElectrOPurist 2 days ago +8
They were going to, but then they remembered they had to return some video tapes.
8
Randolpho 2 days ago +4
From the top turnbuckle
4
Just_Candle_315 2 days ago +7
BAH GAWD THATS THE UNDERTAKER'S MUSIC
7
Champ_5 2 days ago +2
RKO out of nowhere
2
CollyLee0 2 days ago +1
📣: "K.O.! Authors win!"
1
encantoMariposa 2 days ago +1
The question is HOW (With her spoon)
1
lawdjesustheresafire 2 days ago +1
I didn’t slam her I blasted her, leaving onlookers stunned!
1
CranDrescher 1 day ago +1
On the frozen steel slab Cold Stone style?
1
Crossovertriplet 2 days ago +1
Can you smell what the Grok is cooking?
1
LayneCobain95 2 days ago
It’s always funny how there’s always at least one comment offended by the wording of news article titles lol
0
cokeplusmentos 2 days ago +1
Ur about to get slammed
1
Due-Sun7513 2 days ago +22
She also told them to buy crypto. Don’t take advice from her or any other celebrity, do your own research folks.
22
AuroraBolognese 1 day ago +1
Yeah I agree but it’s not an exaggeration to say “doing your own research” these days is very much having to decide who to trust. When big wigs like Disney are now firing people en masse to use more AI, and people like Reese and Sandra Bullock are telling everyone to embrace it, when you go about researching *anything* how do you determine what information has or hasn’t been compromised yet? The shit is everywhere, and to tell people to “do your own research” is quickly becoming shorthand for, “I don’t have any answers for you.”
1
CardiologistSea5044 2 days ago +16
‘Learn AI?” You mean - like learn how to use it?
16
Ok-Coconut-5965 2 days ago +8
Learn AI. When you’ve got that down, move on to EOU. Then you’re ready for Y. Sometimes.
8
mosquem 2 days ago
Honestly that’s not a bad stance. It’s useful for a lot of menial stuff, just don’t use it to outsource your entire job. The tribalism about it has gone too far.
0
D-Biggest_Wheel 1 day ago +12
There's nothing to "learn" 
12
mosquem 1 day ago
I have a lot of menial stuff I do at my job. If I can automate it out with AI and focus on the cooler/high impact stuff, I will.
0
D-Biggest_Wheel 1 day ago -1
You are not listening what I'm saying: there is nothing to learn. You don't need to learn anything to use AI.
-1
GutterspawnGames 1 day ago +1
Here’s your dunce hat 🧢
1
D-Biggest_Wheel 1 day ago +1
Stick to spending time with your kids, instead of with AI, old man. lol.
1
Magpie_Coin 2 days ago +22
So let’s have AI replace her in all her movies and shows.
22
yautjaisforlovers 2 days ago +16
Reese has always monopolized on emerging grifts, whatever marketing firm she uses is extremely shitty. She was a shill for NFTs and now AI, this is very on brand for her.
16
SafeKaracter 2 days ago +14
I’m tired of celebrities and people idolizing them. They’re good at their particular talent , that’s about it
14
onlyIcancallmethat 2 days ago +9
This is ridiculous. She wants women to understand a tool that is rapidly taking over the workforce. The people using and understanding AI are the one who will ride this out. This is not the same thing as supporting AI generated art.
9
drossglop 1 day ago +6
Yeah I mean you can dislike ai and still know the ins and outs of it. My boss (and I’m sure many others) is expecting me to use it for certain tasks. At the end of the day, technology creates more jobs than it takes. Once employers realize it’s a tool and not a magic wand, the hype will plateau and those who have an understanding of it will probably be fine in the long run.
6
AcademicBlueberry328 1 day ago
This is basically agreeing in advance to that people that will be put out of work (if that ever happens, it’s a strong message though) will have themselves to blame. It’s the same idea as that poor people or unemployed people could do just fine, if they *just applied themselves*. Then the differentiation between good/bad use — where do you draw the line? Is having to wonder if all messages you receive really made for you, or just generically formulated? I mean I can just imagine how nihilistic dating will become, if even possible after tinder. It doesn’t have to be that way, but it’s not like these companies go like “ooh let’s solve climate change by doing ml models that will maximise grid capacity” (which is done already). It’s about plugging in these tools as far as possible, making people feel that they will be thrown out if they don’t adapt (“learn”), and lock and load the Blizzard-style subs. I’m not saying it has its uses. But seeing people boost about “wow look I generated this report on 90 pages in 30 minutes without reading a thing!” is like … what would I then read it?
0
GrandpasDisappointed 2 days ago +94
“I think we should learn the basics together and learn some really good tools that are going to make our everyday lives easier and better.“ Genuinely, where would I use AI in my everyday life? Not counting work, where it’s being pushed down my throat, and even there, the most reliable use I have for it is adding docstrings to my code. This has been something that’s been stressing me out every time someone says, “you’re gonna be left behind if you don’t learn AI,” because what am I missing? I don’t know how it would make my everyday life easier and better, if anything, it’s made my life worse and frustrating.
94
Zealous-Avocado 2 days ago +61
It’s telling how few people are concerned with the devastating environmental impact and the data centers being put in neighborhoods. It’s also shocking how many people are willing to give up any semblance of thinking and let a machine do it for them “Oh it can take notes!” How about using your brain??
61
StevoTheMonkey 1 day ago +2
A ChatGPT search makes the same environmental damage as watching a streaming service for 12 seconds. The impact is coming from giant companies using AI for idiotic things, not every day people asking it to help them find the right doctor for their grandmother.
2
dudushat 2 days ago
>It’s also shocking how many people are willing to give up any semblance of thinking and let a machine do it for them When I read comments like this it seems like there's no thinking behind it and you're just regurgitating what youve read on social media. Its like saying we shouldn't use calculators or Google. 
0
spartakooky 2 days ago -15
Agreed. If AI disappeared tomorrow, these ppl would stop complaining about data centers. What they hate is job replacement. If they cared about the environment, we would have raised hell long ago. What I think is really telling is when ppl use this argument. It's so obviously a talking point they are just repeating
-15
senator_corleone3 2 days ago +5
Yes, if data centers and AI went away, it would stop screwing with the environment and people wouldn’t complain. Great insight! Also a weird assumption that people are only worried about environmental impact now due to AI. You just like your plagiarism tool and have made it into your personality.
5
Ordinaryjay 1 day ago +4
What worried you before… what do you think “the cloud” is?
4
senator_corleone3 1 day ago +1
It’s telling that you needed a false analogy. You have no real argument on this topic.
1
EchidnaOk7537 2 days ago +2
I literally have zero reason to use ai in my life and, when it's recommended to me by people who think I should, it's always for tasks that literally take a few minute inside my brain anyway. 
2
ProfCarmine 2 days ago +2
Because it is a tool for corps and nations. A tool that some people know how to use effectively and a tool that some do not. If you do not support it because of environmental concerns, or fear that people will force themselves out of a job, that makes sense, I can't force you to learn the tool or try to find usage in your everyday life. But I think nations or corporations are trying to learn it and invest in it for fear of being left behind. From an enviromental or job/thought reduction standpoint there is no way that ALL of the other nation in the world share you sentiment, they are concerned that AI is the future and if you don't invest now you will get left behind other countries as cost structure dynamics wildly shift. Any nation that you view as a threat to your local economy could in theory adopt AI reap the benefits while you moral stance on it and the overall economy for your area will errode. If you argue the fact that the economy will erode as people lose jobs, I can't defend that, I can just theorize that I think the overall thesis would be that being a late adopter if/when AI leads to major breakthroughs would be worse than saving jobs.
2
Ordinaryjay 1 day ago
Shocking how many people didn’t care about the 10000+ data centers we already built until it ai slop annoyed them.
0
mosquem 2 days ago -2
Stop eating beef if you’re that worried about the environment.
-2
senator_corleone3 2 days ago
What a stupid response lol!
0
McFlyyouBojo 2 days ago +8
Ive lived through enough "you are going to be left behind if you dont learn to use (x)" to know that this likely isn't it. It feels closer to a fad. While I could be wrong, I genuinely dont see any actual purpose for it beyond making an ai Google something for you just to skip the tiping bits.
8
SummerEchoes 2 days ago +7
If you use a thinking/reasoning model (that’s just what they call it) it’s significantly better than Google. Faster and will include links so you can check accuracy. Google results have gotten so bad lately with just SEO and ads everywhere.
7
Quixotic_Seal 2 days ago +4
One of the more frustrating things about using AI as a search engine replacement is that the ones I’ve interacted with(Copilot, Gemini) are usually pretty f****** terrible at providing the relevant links to each piece of information. It usually just kinda squirts like 5 links out at the end of a section or response, and half the time the most relevant thing you can find are just Listnook or Quora threads that only vaguely mention the relevant aspect you’re looking for; which the AI has extrapolated on(and often seemingly combined with further, unlinked content given its accuracy…or you discover it’s a hallucination of course). I do actually enjoy using AI for searching, but it’s far too unreliable to take at face value and when I am skeptical about something it tells me I often end up having to just google it anyway because attempts to find sources often come up empty. This is a great example of my biggest problem with AI: a ton of people sound more like they’re regurgitating copy for AI companies than describing how these products actually work. Too many seem to be disinterested in telling when an LLM is lying to them, and when they’re not doing an adequate job of citing their sources or showing their work or whatever else it is you want from them.
4
jayne-eerie 2 days ago +1
First, I can’t speak to Gemini but Copilot sucks. I know it’s a reskinned ChatGPT but I swear it’s substantially slower and worse. Second, try telling it what you want! Its default might not be linking or citing sources, so ask it to. You have to treat it like a not very bright assistant; things that are obvious to you, like “don’t extrapolate beyond what you can directly verify,” are not obvious to it.
1
justherefor23andme 2 days ago +22
So a glorified search engine?
22
VeganBigMac 2 days ago +13
It’s always odd that people call it a search engine as a pejorative when search engines fundamentally changed how modern society functions.
13
Intelligent-Screen-3 2 days ago +11
Pretty much.
11
Healthy-Travel3105 2 days ago +3
It's a preprocessed search engine. It's an autocorrect that has already read all the search results so it can potentially answer your question in context with the exact way you asked it. Though it can also just confidently lie like the listnookors it was trained on.
3
SummerEchoes 2 days ago +1
That's why I said thinking/reasoning models, which actively searches live search results and data. Earlier models did what you said, but that's not what the big ones do today.
1
redditor_040123 2 days ago -1
But google uses AI….
-1
Rashaverak420 2 days ago +4
Using it to gather data on stuff with a series of inquiries then doing quick examinations of said data is quite useful. Or having it summarize an article, book, etc. Asking it to check bias on this stuff as well. Like I've had discussions with people on some topics and using AI to gather primary/secondary sources has helped a lot compared to googling for said info.
4
MostlyLurking-Mostly 2 days ago +8
If I can't trust the thing to know how many Rs are in the word strawberry, why would I trust it to do my reading for me? Why would I trust a system that takes a stab every time I Google something and needs to be double checked constantly with drawing up my monthly budget?
8
Cabrill0 2 days ago
You aren’t supposed to blindly trust everything it gives you. The point is that it gives you the framework. Instead of spending 4 hours making a monthly budget, the AI makes it in 10 minutes and you spend 20 minutes checking. See how that saves 3.5 hours?
0
bobert0314 2 days ago +4
....its taking you 4 hours to make a budget?
4
Cabrill0 2 days ago +4
does the unit of time truly matter for the example I’m trying to make here? why be so pedantic with a reply like that?
4
bobert0314 2 days ago +2
dont really see it as being pedantic. I was actually wondering if thats how long it took you. felt kinda bad for you if it did and thought there might be some resources I could provide. And the unit of time does matter in this case. I mean if I can budget in less time than you listed for both prompting it and checking it, why would I use it? I guess there are people out there who might take that long if they dont know how to budget, but my fear with that is how are they going to check to see if it makes sense at that point? and what do they do if it doesnt?
2
no-name-here 2 days ago -1
1. All of the models have free tiers, and I believe things like google’s “AI mode” are 100% free. 2. LLMs are not good at certain things such as counting characters (unless the model can be told to use a tool to do it, in which case it will be better than a human) because they are primarily designed right now to not work at the character level, but only higher order groupings like words, phrases, sentences, etc.
-1
Purely_Theoretical 2 days ago -2
AI gives you an intuitive understanding of a topic, even if you write a low effort, vague, unorganized prompt. Now your job shifts from "understanding amorphous topic X" to "verifying precise claim Y". Also, flat earthers say scientists get brainwashed in school by blindly accepting everything they are taught. If you disagree with that statement, then you already know it's possible to receive valuable information from AI without blindly trusting it, because you are a Being capable of independent logic and reasoning.
-2
MostlyLurking-Mostly 2 days ago -1
If the best I can get is a general understanding, why wouldn't I just read the top half of a Wikipedia article? At least they have a proven track record and the editors understand that you shouldn't put glue on a pizza.
-1
Purely_Theoretical 2 days ago
Wikipedia is intended as a reference, not a pedagogical tool. Why do generations of engineers fail to understand what Fugacity really means if the top half of Wikipedia exists? Wikipedia does not have an article for every concept you want to learn about. What is a Harned Cell? You cannot ask Wikipedia a question. Why is mass constant in Newton's 2nd law of motion? Sometimes *Wikipedia* can only give you a general understanding. What is the true definition of thermodynamic activity? How is the defining equation derived? AI can tell you and produce a step-by-step derivation. >understand that you shouldn't put glue on a pizza. So you see something obviously wrong, you know to ignore it. Remember, you have logic and reasoning. The flat earther's argument is wrong. Lastly, it's important *when* you last used AI, since the pace of progress is so fast, and *what* model you are using. Reasoning models produce much higher quality answers.
0
MostlyLurking-Mostly 2 days ago +3
If I'm learning something totally new, I don't know what is or isn't obviously wrong. Unless I read the material myself the old fashioned way, I can't double check the LLM, which means I'm trusting it. I don't trust LLMs because they can't actually know anything.
3
Nerdlinger 2 days ago -2
In addition to what the others have brought up, I'll offer this: Google Maps used to give plenty of fucked up directions early on. E.g. it's told me to do things like make a U-turn on a highway in a tunnel where directions of travel are separated by a wall. It got better over time. Do you expect the output of AI to never improve as time goes on?
-2
MostlyLurking-Mostly 2 days ago +4
No, but it's going to take years of perfect performance for me to trust it with even the most basic tasks. The point is that this tech is great for sorting through big data sets, but I'm not sifting through a million satellite photos. Civilian, non-commercial use is limited to banging out a meme here and there and *maybe* trusting an LLM to identify spam emails. Unless you're willing to trust a technology still in the "lots of fuckups" stage, it's just an occasionally amusing doodad.
4
Quixotic_Seal 2 days ago +2
It already has improved a lot. But the problem is that when a GPS gives you bad information, it’s blindingly obvious. AI though is usually much more opaque in when it gets something wrong, it will absolutely gaslight you into thinking it’s right. Yet people act like it’s a decade ahead of where it actually is. We’re still in the early Apple Maps days, at best, but people are trusting what these things say implicitly. They squirt out a list of like 5 sources at the end of a lengthy section of information. If you press it to give you a more detailed breakdown of where it found each piece of information it, often it just can’t because LLMs struggle a lot with direct instructions that require them to parse or structure their replies in a specific way. And then when you do dig through the sources, you often find that there *is no direct source* they used to get to an answer and some of the sources are just social media posts that barely even really discuss the topic. Even if when you look it up through traditional means, it turns out to be true and it clearly is basing its answer on SOMETHING. LLMs and generative AI are extraordinarily unreliable and difficult to get precise answers out of, and what concerns me most about their adoption is how many people seem utterly unable to internalize that and swallow the lies they tell.
2
Tonicwind88 2 days ago -3
Saying you cant find the use in AI in your daily life is as bad a take as saying you dont find a use for the internet, or cars, or electricity. Kids in the 90s got a huge boost growing up on the internet and yahoo and google to help them grow. AI is in the same early stages and kids growing up on it now and using it correctly are going to be miles and miles ahead of their peirs. A kid being able to teach themselves piano or guitar or math at the age of 4 without the help of a parent is game changer in human history. The ONLY people actually scared of AI or downplaying what potential AI has to bring in the future, are going to be replaced by it for that exact reason.
-3
GildedDreams25 2 days ago +29
i’m so sick of the conversation around “replacing people” like that’s some good thing, this is a tool for the wealthy to extract t more wealth by paying less people
29
BabypintoJuniorLube 2 days ago +27
How does Ai teach young kids musical instruments? What models do that? All research indicates on AI use is focused on the classroom, but it is disastrous for young kids brains to outsource their homework and thinking to an LLM. I've been following this for a while and curious where you found a source that said AI was good for kids?
27
Tonicwind88 2 days ago -11
Me: Can you explain to me how to create a g chord on a guitar? AI: Standard open G major, lowest to highest string: **3–2–0–0–0–3** That means: * low E string: **3rd fret** * A string: **2nd fret** * D string: **open** * G string: **open** * B string: **open** * high E string: **3rd fret** Use this fingering: * **middle finger** on low E, 3rd fret * **index finger** on A, 2nd fret * **ring finger** on high E, 3rd fret That is the easiest starter version. A fuller version a lot of players use is: **3–2–0–0–3–3** Same as above, but also put: * **pinky** on the B string, 3rd fret That version sounds tighter and works better when switching to C, D, or Em in a lot of songs. A few practical points: * Curl your fingers so they come down more on the fingertips. * Make sure the A string finger is not muting the D string. * Press just behind the fret, not directly on top of it. * Pick each string one at a time. If one sounds dead, that finger is usually touching a neighboring string. Quick memory trick: **two fingers on the low side, one or two fingers on the high side, middle strings open.** If you want, I can show you the **easiest way to switch between G, C, D, and Em**, which is where most beginners get stuck. Me: thats ok, im just showing some listnookor that theyre dumb AI: Fair enough. Then the clean version is: A **G major chord** on guitar is usually: **3-2-0-0-0-3** or **3-2-0-0-3-3** From the lowest string to the highest. If they still do not get it, they are arguing with reality, not you.
-11
Accomplished-View929 2 days ago +13
They can get the same thing from a YouTube video.
13
BabypintoJuniorLube 2 days ago +18
A youtube video is better is every way. You can show the actual guitar and finger placement. Even a book at the library would have pictures. I cant think of a worse way to learn guitar than an AI summary from a chatbot
18
Accomplished-View929 2 days ago +5
I know. I’m an adult, and I need to see the finger placement!
5
Quixotic_Seal 2 days ago +3
….this definitely sounds like useful information to a small child that won’t need parental guidance at all.
3
BabypintoJuniorLube 2 days ago +15
How does the 4 year old who cannot read and has attention span issues learn from a chatbot?
15
[deleted] 2 days ago -3
[deleted]
-3
Healthy-Travel3105 2 days ago +5
I'm sorry, I use AI. Music is a dog shit way to use it. You really should be learning from youtube videos where you can actually physically see how the person holds the guitar.
5
Tonicwind88 2 days ago -7
Dude, seriously. Do you have any kind of imagination at all? 4yo is hyperbole because people are going to get better and better in the future - im sure there are 5 and 6 year olds that read well these days - im sure 4 is not far off. The information I just showed you right now hardly needs to be read - like it could be read aloud to this imaginary 4 year old. If youre going to argue to me that a 4 year old would be too dumb or make logical fallacies like this kid would also have attention span brain rot - then its a good thing that in a few years we will have full visual models that could teach us exactly like a real human would one of the other 1000 ways there are to convey information into the human brain.
-7
Affectionare_Arm8074 2 days ago +4
The sad truth is that people aren't getting better and better. See "Fortune": Gen Z is the first generation less cognitively capable than their parents.
4
Quixotic_Seal 2 days ago +2
….literacy rates in elementary school children are infamously in the toilet right now. This is a well known problem among educators. A 4 year old isn’t even in Kindergarten yet. I promise you, most cannot read and those who do are in the early stages of it.
2
Tonicwind88 2 days ago -3
As a guitarist, I would be perfectly happy with that assessment being taught to my 4yo kid asking a simple question. If i asked it how to make every other chord it would likely be mostly correct if not 100% correct. this is fundamental shit. like 2+2. And again, if you cannot see how that is beneficial to people that actually know how to learn and think, then yeah, youre kinda fucked for the future whether you agree with it or not
-3
BabypintoJuniorLube 2 days ago +9
Your 4 year old cant read how are they learning for a wall of text with no pictures?
9
Ordinaryjay 1 day ago +1
NotebookLM
1
[deleted] 2 days ago -2
[removed]
-2
BabypintoJuniorLube 2 days ago +2
Did you just stalk my profile over the entertainment sublistnook? Loser behavior dude.
2
happyscrappy 2 days ago +1
> Genuinely, where would I use AI in my everyday life? Language translation. Speech recognition. I'm very anti-AI, I use no agentic stuff or generative stuff. I have problems with the business trying to "hyperscale" when it makes no sense and just steals resources from everyone else. But it's surprising to me talking to teens right now how anti-AI they are. Much more strongly. I don't know if I actually expect it to stick. Eventually young people will have things they want done that AI can do well. They'll start using it, perhaps even pretending it isn't AI, I dunno. By then maybe the Sam Altman's and similar of the world will have figured out how to make a business that actually makes sense from a resource and financial perspective. I hope the people who are opposing resource-hogging, 2-job-making datacenters hold the line and force this.
1
Oldschoolgroovinchic 2 days ago
My favorite way of using AI is when I don’t know what to make for dinner. I’ll list some ingredients and ask AI to suggest a meal and it will give me a great recipe. I still search for recipes online or even use recipe books if I’m planning in advance, but sometimes I need some extra help in a pinch.
0
SwiftySanders 2 days ago +14
We went from “learn to code” to “learn A.I.” This is a disaster waiting to happen and all for everything to be more expensive and shittier than before AI.
14
DiskBusiness7212 1 day ago +1
Yes and no. Is stuff shittier than before the internet? Arguably. Should people all know how to use the internet? Absolutely.
1
Inevitable_Eagle2130 1 day ago +2
Right? And how the f*** does someone “learn” AI anyway? You ask it questions and you get back lies. Done.
2
melancious 1 day ago
nah, AI takes skill to get decent results. Most people don't know how to use it properly.
0
Inevitable_Eagle2130 1 day ago +5
What skills?
5
KittyIsAn9ry 2 days ago +9
Tell me you have invested in AI without telling me
9
SkyYellow_SunBlue 2 days ago +3
That’s a bingo!
3
Chu_Kiddin_Me_Or_Wha 2 days ago +6
This is stupid. People should learn A.I. It’s a trchnology tool. Whether or not it becomes integrated, its wise to understand and know how to use it.
6
TanAllOvaJanAllOva 1 day ago +3
So she forgot to disclose this was a paid endorsement?
3
Dry-Wolf6789 2 days ago +23
I'm not sure where she told people to use ai to replace anything creative. 
23
MsBit_Commit 2 days ago +21
AI scrapes the data of authors’ work without their consent, that is why they are upset
21
Dry-Wolf6789 2 days ago -1
Ok then do something about that. Doesn't mean ai is bad lol that's a company doing that 
-1
MsBit_Commit 2 days ago +4
AI is bad. And they’re all doing that.
4
senator_corleone3 2 days ago +4
It actually does mean it is bad.
4
MenaFWM 2 days ago
Exactly, people knee jerk reacting to the title.
0
WalterPecky 2 days ago -6
She is right too. Women and minorities should leverage the tools of the ruling class It's the equivalent of telling women in the early 90's to learn how to navigate the internet.
-6
crowieforlife 2 days ago +10
It's more like telling women in the early 00's to buy a .com webpage. Half of AI datacenters have now been cancelled. The costs of producing a reply don't match the amount people are willing to pay for generating this reply, which is why current AI businesses are running at a massive loss. And all of the recent AI models have not shown enough improvement over the existing ones to keep having hope that this will change. Meaning we're in for a massive price hike that no one really will be able to afford. Consumer AIs will go out of business, government might keep a private model for state use, and that's it.
10
Emory_C 2 days ago +1
You’re delusional if you think AI is going away. Are we in a boom? Absolutely. But the Internet didn’t go away after the bust - it just consolidated under a smaller number if companies. Same will happen here.
1
ThunkAsDrinklePeep 2 days ago +7
They're investing in the prospect of eliminating labor entirely.
7
DialecticalDeathDryv 2 days ago +2
I think part of the outrage is people who think she should instead openly resist the ruling class. I think people are optimistic (whether they should be or not) that there's a moment to reverse AI here so I think they feel like that betrays that moment, or works for the ruling class in this moment.
2
Dry-Wolf6789 2 days ago +1
She is the ruling class. Why do people continually think they will give a f*** about us. 
1
jayne-eerie 2 days ago +1
She’s a rich white woman from the south. She IS the ruling class. She might not be politically conservative but why would anyone expect her to side with the downtrodden? Because she talks about feminism sometimes?
1
DialecticalDeathDryv 2 days ago +1
I’m not saying they’re expecting it. I’m saying I think this is where their moral outrage is coming from. I think they’re not thinking of it like “telling women not to learn the internet in the 90s” because they actually think there’s a chance AI doesn’t become that ubiquitous. I think they’re upset to see another member of the ruling class, tell us lowly serfs that there’s nothing we can do to stop AI.
1
Physical_Mushroom_29 2 days ago +16
Reese is saying women should keep up with technology innovations and stay relevant in the job market. You dont have to like AI but if corporations are using it and you want to be employed by those corporations, then it makes sense to learn how to use it. If you dont care about corporate jobs and dont want one, then by all means ignore and resist AI, you dont need it. If you're going to take a moral stand against something that is permeating many industries, realize there may be consequences to your prospects
16
AcademicBlueberry328 2 days ago +6
Yeah that just falling for the same fomo c*** that corporations have been pushing forever. It’s the same story as in here’s the door, there’s a line waiting to get you job, you choose. It’s not about AI.
6
Pretend-Society6139 2 days ago -4
Right. Folks see AI and take out pitch forks but I always tell everyone to know your enemy especially with how much misinformation is being pushed online. I think globally especially in America we should have classes on how to spot fake info and Ai videos. I’m so tired of ppl being fooled by the videos but it will continue to happen if they dnt educate themselves and like your point it will definitely benefit them in the job market. I don’t support AI but I understand it enough not to be fooled by the images and videos.
-4
EchidnaOk7537 2 days ago +1
I mean I agree with your last point but you never have to use it to educate yourself on it's patterns and recognise it. 
1
TonyDoover420 2 days ago +4
We don’t learn AI, AI learns us
4
Big-Load-8864 2 days ago +6
"learn A.I." lmao
6
Neumanae 2 days ago +2
Don't care enough to agree to LA Times dystopian tos.
2
MisterFingerstyle 1 day ago +2
There’s nothing to “learn”. You type in a prompt, a jumbled mixture of stolen content pops out.
2
lucolapic 1 day ago +2
What is with all these celebrities promoting AI lately?? I saw Sandra Bullock say something like this, too. Christ the environmental impact alone is enough to condemn it not to mention all the other negatives. I suppose once you’re already rich and made it, AI slamming the door on opportunities for other up and comers in the entertainment business is no skin off their nose. 😒
2
Randolpho 2 days ago +9
> Well…I’ve decided it’s TIME,” she wrote in the caption of an Instagram reel on Wednesday. “The AI revolution has begun, and I need to learn as much as I possibly can about AI and share it with all of you. Also, FYI: the jobs women hold are 3x more likely to be automated by AI, yet women are using AI at a rate 25% lower than men on average. We don’t want to be left behind. So…do you want to learn with me?” > In the video, which the star shared across social media platforms, Witherspoon said she was with 10 women at a book club this week. “I said to the 10 of them, ‘How many of you guys use AI?’ And only three of them used AI. And then I said, ‘How many of the three of you feel like you really know what you’re doing or using it the right way?’ And there was only one person,” she said. > “So, if three out of 10 women are the only ones using AI, that means 70% of that group is not keeping up. The thing I’ve learned about technology is if you don’t get a little bit of understanding from the very beginning, it just speeds past you. So you have to have little bits of learning just to keep up.” Wow, how dare she have good practical advice for people.
9
PayPsychological9762 2 days ago +3
Reese Wars. In the Search of  More Money. Coming soon to theaters near you.
3
quangtran 2 days ago +8
This is going to be an unpopular opinion because it goes against a lot of the comments in other threads, but she's completely right. First I'll preface this by saying that I'm against AI and refuse to learn it despite my industry moving that direction, but a lot of regular workers are already using AI to help with their jobs (like one guy I know who lets AI help out with his work while on his lunch break). Most of the job applications I see in my field are either AI jobs or have AI components to them.
8
Veronome 2 days ago +30
It's inevitable because investors in AI *say* it's inevitable. People are naturally resisting AI because whatever benefits it may have are massively outweighed by its downsides, both actual and potential. So "it might doom us all, but it's the future so get on board!" isn't the attitude to take. It should be resisted. Let the damn bubble burst, let the investors lose their money, and let AI become a specific and limited tool, rather than the entire structure of a society.
30
r2002 2 days ago +1
So your strategy is to outlast hyperscalers like google? Rofl
1
Veronome 2 days ago +1
Why not? No company is too big to have projects fail; Zuckerberg's metaverse disaster proved that.
1
r2002 2 days ago +1
I think in terms of new comers like OpenAI, it can absolutely go bust and you very well could outlast it. But Google and Amazon are not going anywhere. They have an almost bottomless treasury with near-monopoly like revenue generating machines outside of AI to sustain AI for as long as they want.
1
dudushat 2 days ago -1
Its inevitable because the technology is actually useful despite the circlejerking on listnook. >People are naturally resisting AI because whatever benefits it may have are massively outweighed by its downsides, both actual and potential. This is completely false and you guys only believe it because you keep reading it on listnook. Its fear mongering BS.
-1
Veronome 2 days ago +4
Ah yes, I suppose every media publication and *Sam Altman himself* are all lying about the dystopian direction that AI is going.
4
DialecticalDeathDryv 2 days ago +2
Forget your ACTUAL experiences with the workforce and economy! Everything is fine dammit!/s
2
EnvironmentalPark870 2 days ago +14
Her pedantic tone missed the real issues surrounding AI. She said "we are using it wrong." Which I dunno, was she implying that all middle-age women know how to do with AI is make s*** cartoon caricatures of themselves? Is she worried about being replaced herself by AI actors? Was she talking about generative AI vs automation? I don't think she knows what she is talking about herself. But the real question we should be talking about is "making our lives easier and better" worth the cost to our environment and the havoc data centers are causing?
14
quangtran 2 days ago +2
>she implying that all middle-age women know how to do with AI is make s*** cartoon caricatures of themselves? I highly doubt that's what she's implying becasue as she said, men are already using it and there's a possibility that women are making themselves jobless for ethical reasons. >But the real question we should be talking about is "making our lives easier and better" worth the cost to our environment and the havoc data centers are causing? The problem is that the question has already been answered by the business world, and that answer is "yes". As always, the environment  has been deemed a secondary concern.
2
EnvironmentalPark870 2 days ago +4
Well if the “business world” said so it must be good! Bring on the data centers.
4
pasterhatt 2 days ago +3
Ok Reese, sell your likeness to the studios for use in their ai, see how well that works for you.
3
whatizitman 2 days ago +4
AI sucks. What I find most despicable is the *deceptively* accurate output it can generate. But you can’t know how and why it truly sucks, and recognize it, until you learn something about it and try using it. Don’t bury your head in the sand. Learn the tools of the enemy. I also recommend reading the Bible for the same reasons. You can’t really call out bullshit you actually know nothing about.
4
Old_Channel44 2 days ago +1
You don’t learn Ai. Ai learns you
1
Mermaid_Kiss 2 days ago +1
I think her viewpoint has valid points and valid criticisms.
1
bakeacake45 2 days ago +1
Learn it, it’s critical we all learn everything we can. Why? Because You cannot fight what you don’t understand.
1
FluffyWuffyVolibear 1 day ago +1
I mean she's mostly just advocating for women to be educated on how it is used so that specifically women aren't disproportionately fucked by it
1
TeslasAndComicbooks 1 day ago +1
Why does every title include “slam”? AI could have wrote a better title.
1
moonrocksox 1 day ago +1
Putting learning and AI in the same sentence is so ironic? I may be in the minority but most of these "challenges" aren't inconveniences at all for me. The process of creating art is kind of the whole point? You're suppose to put some part of yourself into the project. It's what adds soul and substance. If you consider your craft to be a chore to do without thought than I'm assuming you never really truly valued it to be begin with. Honestly feels like a lost cause at times. How do you find common ground with someone who has deemed their own thoughts, emotions, reasonings, and ideas as something they need done FOR them?
1
Derpykins666 1 day ago +1
The most useful everyday 'use' case for AI is using it like it's some random assistant. In a lot of cases, that just entails you working with a thing that creates more work for you too. I think it's useful for cataloguing data for you, and maybe for simple questions, but otherwise, especially with a lot of creative endeavors or writing, I feel like you shouldn't be using AI that much.
1
Sea-Concept-4351 1 day ago +1
Whether we like it or not. AI is not going anywhere. It's getting integrated into every and I mean every single computer platform and piece of software. You can't use Google, Apple, or Microsoft products without using AI now. The thing is, you don't have to learn to use it, when you're already using it without knowing it.
1
BigMack6911 1 day ago +1
I mean she's right though. It's just like when computers came out in the 90s and people had to learn that or be in the dark ages. Adapt or struggle
1
notthatgeorge 23 hr ago +1
Not really the same thing, I work on a computer it doesn't do my job
1
Pietkroon 1 day ago +1
Is Reece neurodivergent perhaps?
1
notthatgeorge 23 hr ago +1
She deserves to be slammed, I think any actor pulling this AI is good bullshit should never work again unless it's an AI version of themselves
1
Bread_Low 15 hr ago +1
Is charlize gonna chime in?
1
ninjaturtlebomb 5 hr ago +1
I like the movies she's in. She doesn't need to make anymore impact in my life than that.
1
davesaunders 2 days ago -1
She's not wrong. That doesn't necessarily mean you have to use it. But if you're gonna b**** about something, you should know how it actually works and where it's actually useful. This tool is not likely to go away anytime soon so clutching your pearls and pretending it doesn't exist, won't help.
-1
moistmasterkaloose 2 days ago +1
SLAM BLAM BASH BOOM POP POW GAZUMP
1
saibjai 2 days ago +1
The whole point of AI at this level... is you don't have to learn a single thing.
1
devil1fish 2 days ago +1
I will not do that, no.
1
Capacitorfailure 2 days ago +1
It’s a tool get over yourself Witherspoon fans. Like all tools dangerous and helpful. And best built with safety’s like the band saw that stops when a finger is near. I’m learning electronics as a hobby. In the past I could ask a question, get a google search directed to a forum or YouTube Tube and sift inconsistent answers or wade through Fivver YouTube video logos and like subscribe plea’s looking for a “good” answer. Now I can ask AI. I like that tool. Should it be used poorly to make a Trump Jesus or a classmate n***? No, but it’s not going away so slamming someone saying to learn to use it is just Luddite c***.
1
Fantastic_Wash56 2 days ago +1
Bet you the same authors complaining also use AI, but have to complain about it to not out themselves amongst their peers for using AI. 🥂
1
rem_1984 2 days ago +1
Tbh, it is a practical piece of advice for women in the workforce. I’m not saying let’s invest in it, the corporations already have. And we are at their whim and as wage slaves, need to stay employable and up to date on new tech otherwise we’re screwed. So learn how to use it if your jobs ask
1
TerrificTChalla 2 days ago +1
I see nothing wrong with what she said. Whether most people like it or not AI is here to stay. Being knowledgeable about the tool is important for career stability and trajectory, how you personally choose to engage with it is another matter. AI has its issues. But ignorantly choosing to not learn it or leverage it in a reasonable manner personally is like choosing to not learn how to use a computer, Microsoft application products, etc.
1
daywalker91 2 days ago -11
Listnook hates AI but AI is the future. You really should be learning how to use it instead of whining about it.
-11
← Back to Board