pfew, the district can finally run a youthful 75 year old again
4434
Kentust3 days ago
+830
75??? A little young for politics, don't you think?
830
Pork_Chompk2 days ago
+157
Whippersnapper like that doesn't have the life experience necessary for public office.
157
the_blackfish2 days ago
+59
Experience with what? Electricity?
59
johnnybiggles2 days ago
+30
The series of Internet tubes.
30
pesto_changeo2 days ago
+6
Senator Ted Stevens speaks from the grave!
6
class_rando_fxx2 days ago
+6
Dementia and a total shedding of principles
6
DerBingle782 days ago
+11
That’s just a kid!
11
bbb267822 days ago
+253
He was already getting primaried. The frontrunners are a 43 year old state ~~senator~~ rep with a PhD and a 33 year old Harvard educated school board member who worked in the Obama White House.
253
EGislerHD1212 days ago
+193
State Rep.
source: she’s currently my office suitemate.
And will make an amazing Congresswoman.
193
bbb267822 days ago
+89
Shoot. You’re right.
Source: You’re my state rep 😂
89
EGislerHD1212 days ago
+75
Haha. Happy to be of service!
75
BearFluffy2 days ago
+44
I've never heard of you, in large part because I don't live in Georgia, but this is the kind of interaction that I want to see from politicians more. You seem to not be a d***, and from your profile, I probably agree with you on a lot. If your national profile grows and you do more, I'll hopefully remember you and be excited!
44
EGislerHD1212 days ago
+89
Thanks! I made national news briefly when I won my race in a special election in December (Eric Gisler). Won a seat by 2 points in December that I lost in '24 by 22 points.
I'm trying to be as accessible, transparent, and helpful as possible, and do the job the way I've always wanted it to be done for me. No plans right now beyond the GA House. I've got specific things I want to accomplish there.
89
BearFluffy2 days ago
+14
That's awesome and the kind of politicians we need. Keep up the good work!
14
bbb267822 days ago
+12
Don’t take Eric from us! We like him a lot better than the other guy.
12
Wisteriafic2 days ago
+3
Giving you a big wave from over in Vinings! I really like my reps (and plan to volunteer for their campaigns) and I’m glad you’re committed to getting things done and working as a team!
3
alwayssunnyinskyrim2 days ago
+6
This interaction was heartwarming
6
artaxs2 days ago
+4
And her name is?
4
BeerForThought2 days ago
+6
Jasmine Clark
6
Rhine19062 days ago
+3
Dr. Clarke and Everton are the first two legit challengers he’s had since I’ve been back in GA (2019). I’m excited for both of them.
3
SpliTTMark2 days ago
+7
Just 30 more years and will have a millennial
7
Floaty_Waffle2 days ago
+2
And in keeping with the tone of modern politics, we’ve completely skipped over Gen X.
2
clayknightz1153 days ago
+948
Congresspeople have been dropping like flies this term.
948
ceapaire3 days ago
+706
Tends to happen when the average age is 6 years away from retirement.
706
ChasedWarrior2 days ago
+561
6 years past retirement.
561
47isthenew422 days ago
+119
I'm pretty sure it's more than 6 years past retirement at this point.
119
Kodama_sucks2 days ago
+89
It's more like 6 years past life expectancy
89
Jimmyg1002 days ago
+15
I hear they’re trying to figure out how to dust off the corpse of Strom Thurmond and zap it with lightning to bring him back for another term.
15
exipheas2 days ago
+7
If they were bananas they would be too old to use for banana bread.
7
no_id_never2 days ago
+15
Not the right ones :(
15
[deleted]2 days ago
+2
[deleted]
2
ceapaire2 days ago
+2
Not this guy. Average age of this Congress is 59 from what I saw.
2
SoftlySpokenPromises2 days ago
+71
We're reaching the point where the older generations aren't able to maintain their necromancy.
71
Realtrain2 days ago
+36
This is the 3rd oldest Congress in US history.
36
czs50562 days ago
+4
What were the first two? The next two congres? /s
4
LiffeyDodge2 days ago
+12
Congress is the country's most expensive nursing home
12
ailish2 days ago
+16
They stay in Congress until they're 150 years old rather than retiring and letting the younger generation take over.
16
crk41302 days ago
+6
Ya they are all 1000 years old
6
Curmudgeonadjacent3 days ago
+2451
80 years old and was running for reelection, JFC.
2451
SawConvention20233 days ago
+867
He was just a kid 😔
867
YogiTheGamer3 days ago
+288
It’s sad when they go young like that.
288
AtLeastIHaveJob3 days ago
+79
When they go?!?
79
forte27182 days ago
+8
[C'mon, huh!](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pEY6S9xGx3E) I see what you did there ;)
8
Creasy0072 days ago
+64
You know that fat cocksucker says I look like the Shah of Iran??
64
LHGray872 days ago
+18
Next time, there will be no next time.
18
Snapingbolts3 days ago
+69
Struck down in the prime of his youth
69
Dwiggles12 days ago
+29
To the victor, goes the spoils
29
averyrdc2 days ago
+6
Shove your quotations book up your FAT F****** ASS.
6
AtLeastIHaveJob2 days ago
+3
You got no reason to speak to me like this. I always liked you.
3
Saneless2 days ago
+28
He had so many years of not understanding the needs of constituents left in him :(
28
HORSEthedude6192 days ago
+20
Nothing makes me happier than a random Sopranos reference.
20
B0SS_H0GG2 days ago
+8
Anyway....$4 a pound
8
heroman32 days ago
+118
Imagine that Janet Mills is 78 and trying to become a senator.
Embarrassing.
118
mrdilldozer2 days ago
+32
We also have Bernie Sanders who ran for reelection and won at 83. These people would rather die in office than give up power. Millennials have to start running for office. This is insane.
32
peanutski2 days ago
+48
At least Bernie isn’t a corporate stooge pushing regressive policy. That’s the issue with the old guard.
48
HTC8642 days ago
+6
It's not a matter of starting to run for office, it's about how people vote. If you have five challengers every time and the constituency votes for the same person, that's not on the people running.
6
DoctorGregoryFart2 days ago
+18
Bernie is possibly the exception to the rule. The man is sharp and has been a beacon of progressivism his whole career.
I sure wish there were more like him so he could retire.
18
goodlittlesquid2 days ago
+13
We have sitting Senators that are 92.
13
Curmudgeonadjacent2 days ago
+4
Yep, we’re doomed if changes aren’t made.
4
CFBCoachGuy2 days ago
+45
He was known for having health issues [way back in 2022](https://www.politico.com/news/2022/01/13/david-scott-house-agriculture-worries-527015) where he was unable to walk and struggled to complete sentences. And- despite not even being willing or able to vote for himself, he *still* won election. Twice.
He has barely bothered campaigning this year and thought his incumbency and AIPAC support would win him election among redistricted constituents. But three different democratic challengers (which includes a school board chair, a professor of nursing, and a star of the reality series Married to Medicine) have out-fundraised him- something rare to see for an incumbent in a primary.
45
flamehead2k13 days ago
+52
The job is paid well, gives you unmatched connections, and can largely be delegated to your staff.
52
TheBurningEmu2 days ago
+49
At that age just retire and be a talking head on the news ffs. You'll still get paid, don't have to do any real work, and you aren't holding the lives of hundreds of thousands or more people in your arthretic hands.
49
DoublePostedBroski2 days ago
+33
Yeah but then you don’t get kickbacks and lose power and influence.
33
lostroadrunner222 days ago
+15
Power is a hell of a drug.
15
Ckmccfl2 days ago
+3
They don’t want power, they just want the money and the illusion of power
And puss.
3
morosco2 days ago
+3
He couldn't really talk anymore though.
3
flamehead2k12 days ago
+1
I personally agree but I'm not the type to be a politician in the first place
1
Brunette72 days ago
+22
It’s bizarre. I understand that power is addictive, but is there no desire to just go home and enjoy your old age?
22
xIllustrious_Passion2 days ago
+21
Why quit when you can secretly enjoy your old age while still holding your seat and just be counted absentee?
21
KAugsburger2 days ago
+7
Some of these members of Congress have spent so long in some form of elected office that I am not sure that they have a lot of other hobbies to keep them occupied. Some of these people are also too old to really enjoy their retirement. I am not sure that there is much that they could do beyond reading a book or watching some old movies
7
Fight_those_bastards2 days ago
+6
I mean, they’re only really working about 1/3 the time…
6
Extreme-Guava-79402 days ago
+3
It's an extremely low effort job, is the thing. If it was real work you wouldn't see so many elected officials who were decades past retirement age
3
Jean28002 days ago
+7
Addicted to power
7
boot2skull2 days ago
+3
Free healthcare is just that good.
3
jeffersonlane2 days ago
+2
For his 13th f****** term.
2
XylatoJones2 days ago
+2
There is an 85 year old running for their 18th term…
2
ailish2 days ago
+5
They never want to retire. Just completely unwilling to hand the government over the the younger generation.
5
lostroadrunner222 days ago
+4
This is gonna ruin the tour..
4
Ok-Mycologist-38293 days ago
+732
Millennials: we need people our age in office.
732
Xsiah2 days ago
+399
And in 30 years we will!
399
droans2 days ago
+63
That's funny - they're not gonna let spry 65-70 year-olds in Congress! Pay your dues and maybe some of us will have a shot as we approach ninety.
63
thingsmybosscantsee2 days ago
+135
DNC - *no*
135
fascistno1hater2 days ago
+73
Just like you can't see the report on why Kamala lost. It's our private organization and we can do what we want.
73
xxtoejamfootballxx2 days ago
+25
It’s insane when you realize the voters ARE the party. The leadership has it backwards so we need a tea party moment
25
Reasonable_Ticket_842 days ago
+4
That's what happens when the trustfund babies that have never worked a real job and had their parents pay for everything end up as consultants at the DNC and proceed to take control.
4
snydamaan2 days ago
+6
We’re in the tea party moment now, waiting for a democrat version of Trump.
6
xxtoejamfootballxx2 days ago
+10
The tea party had legitimate power, the democrats are not in that moment. They forced the speak of the house to resign, once we get close to even sniffing something like that, I’ll buy that we’re in the moment.
10
Slypenslyde2 days ago
+6
For some reason only the wrong party has that kind of backbone.
6
xxtoejamfootballxx2 days ago
+11
I mean, the republicans *didn't*, which is why it worked. A new wave came in, largely using populist rhetoric and pushed out a lot of the anemic old guard to wrestle a seat at the table and then eventually control of the party.
I think the bigger problem is that the type of people that would make that change for the democrats are generally not as drawn to political office, so we're left with old people who think they're god's gift to america and grifters for the most part.
11
Money_Statement_98612 days ago
+3
Ah yes the superdelegates argument. F****** democrats love to tip the scales in favor of corporate interests
3
SHUT_DOWN_EVERYTHING2 days ago
+5
By DNC you mean Democratic primary voters. They are the ones who make the choice. David Scott in the example above was extremely popular in his district.
> Incumbent David Scott (D) defeated six challengers in the Democratic primary in Georgia's 13th Congressional District on May 21, 2024. Scott and Marcus Flowers (D) led in local media attention ahead of the primary. Scott won with 57.8% of the vote, followed by Mark Baker (D) with 11.6% and Flowers with 9.9%.
5
Libertechian2 days ago
+14
Too many people who have "earned a spot" first, like Hillary
14
upgrayedd692 days ago
+30
Kind of a weird argument to make for Hillary when her competition in the primary was 6 years older lol
30
Libertechian2 days ago
+8
Hillary had already won the "invisible primary" before the primary even happened. She was hand picked and was probably not who the average voter would have picked if given real choices
8
upgrayedd692 days ago
+13
And unfortunately Bernie was not the pick of the average voter in 2020 because everyone coalesced around moderate Biden when their moderate of choice dropped out.
13
mhornberger2 days ago
+2
Get your millennial through the primary and then the general election, and they'll be in office. It's the primary and general election voters keeping these people in office.
2
Uncle_Tickle_Monster2 days ago
+21
Then I guess they should show up in primaries.
21
az_catz2 days ago
+4
Careful, you'll enrage the Progressive Purists.
4
tophergraphy2 days ago
+7
We dont have the free time nor resources to run compared to the generation that actually owns houses at a reasonable rate. Our only plus is being able to navigate different forms of media but most of our peers have been effecticely disenfranchised.
WAFF.
7
Johnny552 days ago
+2
Hey the other Dem we lost this week was only 47
2
RandyOfTheRedwoods3 days ago
+229
Do I have my math right, there have been 4 republicans and 3 democrats who won’t finish their term?
229
defroach842 days ago
+150
7 people in two years, 435 people are in it, with an average age of 57.5.
I don't feel like it is really far from the norm here.
150
TwelveGaugeSage2 days ago
+48
Is that average age up to date or is it from before it just dropped a little?
48
LarxII2 days ago
+2
With how old some of these fucks are, I feel that it was skewed from before and likely quite a bit lower now.
2
Realtrain2 days ago
+9
This is the 4th in like 2 weeks.
9
thisistherevolt2 days ago
+366
Hi y'all. Citizen of his district. He may as well have been dead for twenty years, all the good he did for us out here. Refused to ever meet with us or take the phone calls of concerned citizens. Missed a lot of votes, almost certainly had payola going on.
I'm excited for my vote in the race for GA-13 to actually count for the first time in my adult life. I'm about to turn 40 for context.
366
SHUT_DOWN_EVERYTHING2 days ago
+69
And still, people in his district voted for him in primary:
> Incumbent David Scott (D) defeated six challengers in the Democratic primary in Georgia's 13th Congressional District on May 21, 2024. Scott and Marcus Flowers (D) led in local media attention ahead of the primary. Scott won with 57.8% of the vote, followed by Mark Baker (D) with 11.6% and Flowers with 9.9%.
69
g1ngertim2 days ago
+81
Name recognition is a massive boone for a politician. A lot of people just vote for names they recognize.
One movie I enjoy is "The Distinguished Gentleman", a 90s Eddie Murphy comedy that is basically... this. LOL
>Florida con man Thomas Jefferson Johnson (Eddie Murphy) crosses paths with Congressman Jefferson Davis "Jeff" Johnson at a party and becomes intrigued after overhearing just how wealthy members of Congress can become through corruption. After Congressman Johnson dies of a heart attack while having adulterous sex with a young staffer, con man Johnson decides to run for Congress in the election to replace him to take advantage of money from lobbyists. Omitting his first name, and abbreviating his middle name, he calls himself "Jeff" Johnson. He then manages to get on the ballot by pitching a seniors organization, the Silver Foxes, to endorse him.
>Once on the election ballot, he uses the dead Congressman's old campaign material and runs a low budget campaign that appeals to name recognition, figuring most people do not pay much attention and simply vote for the "name you know." He wins a slim victory and is off to Washington, a place where the "streets are lined with gold."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Distinguished_Gentleman
The ending has a bit of comedic irony too, considering today's political climate. Murphy's character (being a small time conman) learns throughout the movie how deep the cons and corruption in DC politics go (as compared to what he has done), and Murphy's character decides to fight back. Eventually, at the end of the movie, Murphy's character has his full criminal record exposed to the public, and it looks like Congress will vote to expel him.
But...
>As the film ends, it appears likely that Johnson will be thrown out of Congress on account of his previously unknown criminal record, but he defiantly declares, "I'm gonna run for President!" then breaking the fourth wall.
Imagine, a known conman with a lengthy criminal rapsheet, being president and living in the White House. Ha ha ha.
15
infinitum3d2 days ago
+2
This is the mistake we make.
If I recognize your name, I’m voting you out.
2
Coolbluegatoradeyumm2 days ago
+5
Overwhelmingly even
5
DARfuckinROCKS2 days ago
+3
I'm not from GA and I don't feel like doing any research. How's the race looking? Anyone promising? Will Dems keep the seat?
3
beenoc2 days ago
+10
I'm not from Georgia either so I can't speak on the candidates, but his district was Atlanta suburbs. Harris and this guy both won the district by 43 points in 2024, it's very safe blue.
10
monkeypickle82 days ago
+139
Quick, replace him with a 79 year old!
139
Solkre2 days ago
+48
You sure we need that young a voice right now?
48
EaterOfFood2 days ago
+4
You can’t trust those whippersnappers
4
Gloomy-Insurance-7392 days ago
+111
We really need to do something about all these goddamn old people in our government.
111
Acceptable-Peace-692 days ago
+10
Well he died so that’s one less to worry about.
10
KenUsimi2 days ago
+19
I just… I am so tired of my government being run by people holding on till death itself claims them. That’s not how you make sure your works endure; that’s refusing to admit you’re mortal.
19
AllISeeAreGems2 days ago
+10
We really need an age limit on congressional service.
10
B-Glasses2 days ago
+12
Maybe let’s elect some people who aren’t on their death beds?
12
Daveit4later2 days ago
+56
Dude should have retired 20 years ago holy moly
56
Crafty_Fan_62022 days ago
+19
Eighty years old and running for the 13th time. Really? WITAF.
19
tr1cube2 days ago
+40
This guy was no good, essentially Republican lite. He used his office and campaign funds to pay his private employees, private business debt, and rent. I hate that he kept getting elected. He was also against gay marriage for the longest time, opposed the Iran nuclear deal.
40
BlueBod502 days ago
+31
Dems like him are a cancer to the party. They are why Dems are somehow at historically low popularity despite the opposition being even worse.
31
Coolbluegatoradeyumm2 days ago
+7
80 and died in office but was prepping to run again. Surely he was up for the fight
7
Gamer_Grease2 days ago
+5
In case you’re wondering, he marks the fifth member of the House, and fourth Democrat, to die of old age in the last 14 months.
5
youknowimworking2 days ago
+64
Let's put a hard cap at 65. You can't be elected for office if your above the age of 65. Period.
64
az_catz2 days ago
+28
Let's make it an even 70, to double up the minimum age to run for president, 35.
28
Coolbluegatoradeyumm2 days ago
+6
Retirement age is 65 for everyone else. Why not them too
6
Movie_Slug2 days ago
+6
I mean it is now 67 for full social security benefits and 72 for max social security benefits
6
leg_day2 days ago
+3
I'll counter you at 55.
3
melodypowers2 days ago
+5
67 is when you can start collecting full social security, so I would be fine with that. But I would Also be fine with lowering the social security age.
5
OkLab67012 days ago
+12
The new poster boy for Term Limits and Age Caps for government. I am sorry this man died but these people should not be allowed to cling to power until their last breath.
12
Even_Raisin_36452 days ago
+10
Honorable leaders used to pass the torch before their time came as a way to support future generations and ensure their legacy continued
10
HausuGeist2 days ago
+4
Congress should not be a nursing home!
4
VoughtHunter2 days ago
+3
There goes the “narrowing” of the republican majority
3
seilrelies2 days ago
+6
He’s the fifth congressperson to die in office in the last 15 months
6
EndStorm2 days ago
+25
Term and age limits are well overdue.
25
Snarfbuckle2 days ago
+11
In Sweden he would have retired somewhere around 55-65 and become a consultant, board member or just a pensioner enjoying life.
11
Orwick2 days ago
+8
That makes 5 democrats that have died of natural causes this term.
8
Murky-Restaurant82102 days ago
+5
Damn, in his prime too
5
[deleted]2 days ago
+25
[deleted]
25
fffan93912 days ago
+20
Strom Thurmond was in the senate at 100.
20
Foe1172 days ago
+14
there is no rule about being really old in office, only being too young in office.
14
Phillyfan102 days ago
+6
Maaan. Maybe I’m just wired differently, or I’d feel differently in the position they’re in, but I just can’t imagine any scenario where I’d WANT to work at 80, unless it was volleyball referee at a topless resort or something. If I needed money or something that’s a different story, but traveling during the golden years or just putzing around a garden or something sounds so much more enjoyable than throwing on a suit to listen to people talk.
6
RexCrimson_2 days ago
+4
We really need age limits in politics, but the youth don’t even bother voting. So this will never happen.
I hate saying this, but unfortunately I don’t see things changing anytime.
4
Secret_Account072 days ago
+8
Can we stop allowing 80 year olds to hold office? It’s not f****** normal.
Would you allow a general at age 80? Oh you wouldn’t? Imagine that
8
Flimsy-Attention-7222 days ago
+7
Hold office?? Damn if he wasn't running for reelection.. Unfuckingbelievable
7
somecoolname422 days ago
+3
Death, no buddy, not David, Donald.
3
Necx9992 days ago
+3
The Iowa senator is 92! Think about that!
3
GreyBeardEng2 days ago
+3
Another person has left the Washington dc nursing home.
3
MentalDisintegrat1on2 days ago
+9
Sad.
Age and term limits for everyone SCOTUS and presidents included.
9
MaccTHC2 days ago
+4
It is utterly ridiculous that these people stay in office so long they literally die on the job. We gotta replace more of these old fucks
4
phunky_12 days ago
+5
Politicians and judges to be forced to retire out of public office when they hit age 67.
Congress and the White House are not retirement homes.
5
Morallta2 days ago
+6
Not really mad about this.
If you're old enough to be in a nursing home, you don't need to be running our f****** government. I don't give a shit what your leanings are. Step down and allow the current generation to represent itself.
Our country has been run by egomaniacs for record lengths of time, and we've been seeing the results what happens when our elected officials decide to make their service lifelong.
6
vespamike5622 days ago
+7
Does anyone have a problem with an 84 year old Bernie Sanders? He can still function in his job, his mind is sharp and he seems to be in good health. Should he be out as well?
7
digbickrich2 days ago
+36
I love Bernie but yes he should retire soon. Can still champion for the working class from retirement.
36
KathyJaneway2 days ago
+20
Yes. He should've also retired last term. He was 76 in 2016. He's over 1 year older than Joe Biden. He's 2nd oldest senator right now in office. Only one older is Chuck Grassley,who's 92. B**** McConnell is retiring,ands he's few months younger than Bernie. Jim Risch of Idaho is running for reelection at 82 or 83. He's up for reelection this year . Idaho is like the 3rd or 4th most republican state, they haven't had Dem senator in 30+ years at least. So he's getting reelected and if he wins and lives, he will be same age as Grassley was when he ran for reelection last time.
20
External-Praline-4512 days ago
+13
The Bernies of this world should be mentoring and promoting young people. Not getting everyone to rely on them as some kind of saviour when they're over 80! He could still be a political commentator, speaker, etc, but get all these old folks out of government power.
There should be rules about upper age limits for government across the board.Bernie is an exception, but most of them seem incapable of caring about the long-term future of their people they govern.
13
melodypowers2 days ago
+3
He definitely could be an effective elder statesman for the progressive cause.
3
shakeyshake12 days ago
+5
He should be out.
Here’s an article from October 2019 that says his estimated remaining lifespan at that time was 8.7 years before taking into account his heart attack and stents (it doesn’t say how much that should reduce the estimate):
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/bernie-sanders-heart-attack-raises-questions-about-candidates-ages-here-ncna1065036
Without taking into account heart problems, he would have about 2 years left right now as of the October 2019 estimate. I’m assuming that, after taking into account the heart problems, the estimates would say he should probably already be dead.
5
joepierson1232 days ago
+7
Yeah that's the problem it's always "my guy" is the exception.
7
Realtrain2 days ago
+5
Bernie Sanders didn't yell "Who gave you permission to take my picture, a******!" when I journalist snapped a photo of him in a wheelchair.
5
bros4022 days ago
+2
He's a Senator. Their terms are six years. he should not run for another term. He should be passing the torch.
2
Mecha-Dave2 days ago
+2
The last 4 years he's just been a zombie animated with AIPAC money
2
lime-eater2 days ago
+2
80 year old man stops wielding power involuntarily.
2
Mike2k332 days ago
+2
Damn, he had his whole life ahead of him
2
Few-Ad-78872 days ago
+2
Only 80? He had so many years left to serve
2
DepletedMitochondria2 days ago
+2
g e r o n t o c r a c y
2
Nearby-Pen-23922 days ago
+2
Rest in peace David Scott. I pray your family find closure and you find peace in the next life. Weither it was right or wrong, you did what u thought was best and that's all we as humans can do.
2
starrpamph2 days ago
+3
I prefer my representatives familiar with hand crank starting a car thank you very much.
3
Kingfisher9102 days ago
+3
Inappropriate Trump comment inbound. “He was really a bad guy, happy he’s gone”- PDT
3
fkenned12 days ago
+3
This shit is bonkers. I get that we don't wanna put age limits in, but what about conditional limits... Like, if you're running for office at 80, you're eligible to serve 1 year before having to run again... 75 would be 4 years, 70 would be 6, etc. This would be a way to incentivize younger blood. We need to seriously look at term limits in general, because our congress and Supreme Court are fucked right now. For the supreme court, those seats are supposed to function outside of politics and they absolutely do NOT. I'm actually fully behind a complete purge of literally every politician/judge currently serving. Get rid of every single one of them, ban corporate dollars in politics, ban lobbying, ban foreign dollars in politics, ban investments by any person (and their families) serving in congress, and see what happens. My guess? The people start to benefit again. Wow, crazy thought, aye?
3
FordGT20172 days ago
+3
All those old MF rather die on the job than move over and let younger people run the country. This goes for both parties
3
ImmiLitigation2 days ago
+3
Dear God, Trump is also close to 80…
3
Cactusfan862 days ago
+3
F****** arrogant cryptkeepers
3
Notyourfriendbuddyy2 days ago
+3
They are "working" all the way until death! Let that sink in!
3
uvulaInspector2 days ago
+2
Good. Maybe they will ENACT change that has these people exiting before age 70. It makes absolutely no sense to work till death as a representative.
2
BlueBod502 days ago
+2
Btw this pos tried to outlaw gay marriage via *constitutional amendment*. Oh and he was 80 years old, alarmed staffers with how demented he was becoming, and still wanted to run for reelection.
His actions speak for themselves and for his legacy.
2
Shadowthron82 days ago
+2
Fuckin force retirement at at certain age
2
bananamanapie2 days ago
+2
For one moment I thought it said Rick Scott and I was so happy. Well, here’s to hoping.
2
one2treee2 days ago
+2
We need an age cap. These old timers have no skin in the game. No more senior citizens in office. We need people that understand technology and the problems our youth face.
2
sphericalsection2 days ago
+2
Leech on our system. We need to address this, I mean our past 2 presidents are genuine elderly people.
186 Comments