· 155 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 7, 2026 at 11:24 AM

Report: Iran's president accuses IRGC commanders of undermining ceasefire efforts

Posted by rodke


Report: Iran's president accuses IRGC commanders of undermining ceasefire efforts
ynetglobal
Report: Iran's president accuses IRGC commanders of undermining ceasefire efforts
Opposition media says Pezeshkian warned that Islamic Republic's economy is nearing collapse; reports of worsening conditions for Guards and Basij forces, including shortages of food, shelter and delayed salaries

🚩 Report this post

155 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
Ok_Flower7157 3 days ago +770
civilian government wants out irgc doesn't answer to them that's the whole problem
770
daywall 3 days ago +297
Pretty much. The civilian government never had real power, so IRGC dosent havebto answer to them.
297
Roar-Lions-Roar 3 days ago +94
The IRGC knows it’s been so thoroughly depleted that if the war were to end today it would still collapse. Every single one of them knows that if a civilian government gains power they will answer for what they have done and so they’re going down kicking and screaming.
94
sofixa11 3 days ago +79
>The IRGC knows it’s been so thoroughly depleted that if the war were to end today it would still collapse That's a mighty claim. They still have the million strong fanatics of the Basij, how are they depleted?
79
freshmeat2020 3 days ago +58
Agreed, the US can bomb them into oblivion, they'll still pick up arms as soon as the US withdraws. Taliban were quashed for how many years, how long did it take them to regain power when they withdrew?
58
Luciifuge 3 days ago +79
It’s a a lot different from Afghanistan though. Iran has a stronger central govt and a national identity . it’s a proper functioning state.
79
TheMortalOne 3 days ago +14
I don't think the IRGC are damaged enough yet, but this is why I'm more hopeful regarding Iran despite how it played out with the Taliban.
14
Seanspeed 3 days ago +14
Maybe so, but it also means f*** all if that stronger central government has limited or no control over the military.
14
bigloser42 3 days ago +3
I mean if the tiny handed one hadn’t negotiated the withdrawal from Afghanistan with the Taliban rather than the actual government maybe things would have been different. He basically set the country up to be served up on a silver platter to the Taliban.
3
zemelb 3 days ago +1
Roughly 6 minutes IIRC
1
wailferret 3 days ago +15
Nobody shows up to work if they aren't getting paid - that includes IRGC and Basij rank-and-file. Iran was already in terrible shape economically prior the war. They have now suffered hundreds of billions in damages they realistically cannot pay for themselves. Their currency is basically worthless.
15
sofixa11 3 days ago +6
The Basij were the unarmed meat waves sacrificing themselves in the Iran-Iraq war. I don't know any, but salaries are probably pretty low on their list of priorities.
6
ThiccBlastoise 3 days ago +1
They do when the alternative is to watch their home be bombed to oblivion
1
wailferret 3 days ago +3
But that’s not the alternative. Even the maximalist terms Trump shared does not involve taking any land or bombing anyone. Stopping their nuclear and missile programs, halting funding to proxies, and no longer slaughtering protestors is not getting “bombed to oblivion”. Iran surrendering will only be beneficial for the average Iranian, including Basij members. Sanctions will likely be dropped and their currency will no longer be worthless.
3
ThiccBlastoise 2 days ago +2
Trump just yesterday literally posted about “wiping out civilization in Iran”
2
UseBackground2370 3 days ago
Not if they get paid toll fees in the billions.
0
Xeynon 3 days ago +5
>The IRGC knows it’s been so thoroughly depleted that if the war were to end today it would still collapse. Smells like wishful thinking to me.
5
variety_dirtbag 3 days ago +2
Bad take, you don't know enough about this topic to be talking about it.
2
lupinle1 3 days ago +9
Well it doesn't help that the guy they answer to is put into a coma.
9
No-Space937 3 days ago +13
That was kinda the point in selecting him
13
Seis_K 3 days ago +2
I don’t think there’s any way for us to know if he was selected after incapacitation, or if he was incapacitated shortly after being selected 
2
No-Space937 3 days ago +9
Given that he was targeted in the same strike that killed a large part of Iranian upper leadership and has subsequently never made so much as an audio recorded message, I think its a pretty safe assumption that he is more or less being weekend at Bernied.
9
FangioV 3 days ago +30
That’s Lebanon. The government of Lebanon want’s Hezbollah(Iran) out of the country, Hezbollah doesn’t care as they don’t respond to the Lebanese government.
30
nullbyte420 3 days ago +11
Hezbollah is also a major party in Lebanon's government though. It's not that simple 
11
az78 3 days ago +5
That's only a recent phenomenon as of the last election. They likely won't be a major political party after the next one. Even the Shiite population is sick of being dragged into conflict with Israel by them.
5
Delta27- 3 days ago +2
Actuallh the gouverment of lebanon took no steps to remove hezbollah as they dont want to risk their life. This is why they are low key letting israelis do their dirty work for them
2
dce42 3 days ago +3
It's not a bug but a feature. Especially with the siloing of the different elements of the IRGC.
3
Kaffe-Mumriken 3 days ago +3
Plus, the US disrupted their chain of command, there’s no centralized command to tell the IRGC to step down. Each regional officer is acting of their own accord
3
aardwolffe 3 days ago +13
civilians wants out government doesn't answer to them that's the whole problem FTFY
13
OMGDonutz 3 days ago +4
Sounds familiar
4
Nanofeo 3 days ago +2
…you think Pezeshkian is representative of the People? What a joke
2
bilyl 3 days ago +1
Saying Pezeshkian is “civilian” as if they’re not connected to the theocratic leadership is pretty funny
1
Ok-Seaworthiness4488 3 days ago +155
IRGC are the more fanatical part of Iran's military and only answer to the Ayatollah, and if he's incapacitated per rumor, then IRGC leadership is running things (hardliners all the way)
155
kampr3t0 3 days ago +26
IRGC wants status Quo that's why they elected Mojtaba (who is in comma) as Ayatollah successor there is no leader in Iran right now because IRGC consist 30 general who in charge
26
AgUnityDD 3 days ago +4
31 - each with autonomy to act in their own region
4
Roar-Lions-Roar 3 days ago +63
Odd that they are so fanatical while their family members go on prolonged vacation in the US and take racy photos in bikinis.
63
Luckysun2Exlex 3 days ago +85
Yes, it’s so odd that the ruling class are hypocrites. That is uniquely Iranian of course
85
Time-Cap-1609 3 days ago +11
Because its also not just a religious war for them tbh. A fair chunk if Iranians believe that its under the regime that Iran had sort of self governance that they didnt have for the 2 centuries before that.
11
arathorn3 3 days ago +1
Not anymore, those specific two are currently in custody and​and in the procesd of being.Deported.
1
UseBackground2370 3 days ago +3
There are thousands of them
3
Shirolicious 3 days ago +9
And its the IRGC that should be taken out, I hope the US and Israel don’t loose sight of that. I think Iran would still be okayish if after this ordeal the IRGC is deminished to a state wherd they can’t really direcrly influence Iran’s future anymore and its other people within the structure that isnt IRCG.
9
V-Right_In_2-V 3 days ago +9
Correct, but it’s more accurate to describe the IRGC as completely distinct, parallel military. Iran still has a normal Army, Navy and Airforce that is nominally loyal to the nation state of Iran, while the IRGC is loyal to the regime of the Islamic Republic occupying Iran
9
UseBackground2370 3 days ago +3
There is no "nation of Iran" with these people. It's "islamic republic" for them, not Iran. 
3
V-Right_In_2-V 3 days ago +1
That’s correct for the people with all the guns unfortunately
1
Tartuffiere 3 days ago +1
Why aren't this normal army you speak of siding with the President? IRGC is the only group with any real pull it seems.
1
V-Right_In_2-V 3 days ago +3
Only a handful of people know the answer to that question. We can only speculate. Going into this whole endeavor, the biggest question was “What will the artesh do?”. They sided with protestors when the Shah abdicated. There’s been hope they would side with the protesters during every mass uprising. But they still haven’t. So, they are either still loyal to the current regime, or are waiting for the right moment. I think the Islamic Republic never fully trusted the army so maybe they just don’t have the resources to take on the IRGC
3
Tartuffiere 3 days ago +3
From what I gathered the IRGC essentially dismantled the army as soon as this conflict began. They sent them all home and stripped them of their (already inferior since less well funded) equipment.
3
Based-God- 3 days ago +2
weekend at Mojtabas
2
DarthShiv 3 days ago +5
The ayatollah is also a hardliner who had his family murdered
5
Roar-Lions-Roar 3 days ago +39
Considering he’s either dead or brain dead, the new ayatollah is more of a flatliner than a hardliner.
39
DarthShiv 3 days ago +1
🤷‍♂️
1
bond0815 3 days ago +241
Hardly a surprise. I mean we had Iran attacking neighbouring countries the same time the iranian president did explicitly apologize for that. After the targeted killing by Israel and the US its questionable who really is in charge in Iran atm, with many believing is a de facto military dictatorship under the IRGC now.
241
steven4869 3 days ago +124
With reports of Mojtaba being in coma, it's easy to believe that IRGC has taken up entire control over the regime.
124
milo_peng 3 days ago +45
Trump is absolutely right that America facilitated a regime change in Tehran. Just not the one they wanted
45
BigRedNutcase 3 days ago +35
Final regime is still kinda up in the air though. Too early to say which regime Iran ends up with.
35
Luciifuge 3 days ago +19
Yea the regime change is in progress, this stuf doesn’t happen in a such a short time. People seem to be overreacting to every news update, but these processes can take months or years to play out.
19
fleebleganger 3 days ago +7
Unstable times tend to fail in creating stable democracies. 
7
Tartuffiere 3 days ago +3
French democracy was created from the sparks of chaos
3
SporksInjected 3 days ago +5
What about Chinese Democracy?
5
BigRedNutcase 3 days ago +1
Instability is kind of the starting point to stability. The US was pretty unstable before we became what we are now. Even now, we're pretty stable relatively speaking.
1
Donnicton 3 days ago +1
CIA with extra steps
1
thereoncewasahat 3 days ago +19
Well that sounds like the worst possible outcome. They will be more militant.
19
Mourningblade 3 days ago +16
> They will be more militant. The Islamic Republic of Iran's initial government was formed from militant, proselytizing religious fanatics with a doomsday prophecy who were willing to face death and kill lots of people to get their way. They specifically constructed a government architecture that would not just maintain but would spread these properties. The ruling clerics were not and are not moderates. They were and are hard liners who believe god is on their side. They specifically believe their mission from god is to spread their ideology by force. The IRGC has loyalty to the clerics and some senior leadership, but they are also promoted to positions of power because of ideology. Based on my reading, the IRGC is somewhere between a third and half of Iran's economy, including much of both their industry and tourism. One plausible belief held early on was that these generals were less ideological and had more to lose (their Swiss bank accounts, for example), so would be more likely to play ball than the clerics. We also knew there were wings like the Quds forces that were intensely ideological and would be in mortal peril if their regime falls (many governments around the world would love to put a bullet in the heads of each and every member of the Quds forces, with or without a trial). At least some ballistic missile commanders and at least some drone commanders are clearly ideological and have existing orders *from the clerics* to strike until they cannot strike anymore. Last thing: the office of the president in Iran is often given to a chosen conciliatory figure who can go and represent Iran well, provide hope of moderation, and so on. They also have very little power. The IRGC's loyalty was to the Supreme Leader, the revolution, and to their income streams (which were designed to bypass the President). The clerics chose the person who chose the President. The Bassij forces existed to ensure the continuity of the government against the population. The president just made the government basically function. He didn't even pick which foreigners got kidnapped and which didn't. The civilian government of Iran has always been at the mercy of many other, larger forces.
16
Ultra_Metal 3 days ago +20
The regime can't be any more militant than they already were. They were already at maximum since 1979. They've been murdering, torturing, raping and kidnapping people for decades.
20
Twelve2375 3 days ago +21
Military more militant, less civil than civilians. World shocked. More at News on the 9s after traffic.
21
[deleted] 3 days ago -22
[removed]
-22
FrostedSki 3 days ago +7
I don't get it?
7
ResortClear730 3 days ago +2
I think it was a joke in the rumors of him being gay?
2
highgravityday2121 3 days ago -7
So US and Israel made the situation worse is what youre saying. color me surprised.
-7
Wooden-Variety175 3 days ago +189
Ive been saying it for weeks. The IRGC are unable to win and are also extremely motivated not to lose. Every single one of them will get hung for what they did in January if the regime falls and they know that.
189
pkennedy 3 days ago +75
And every one of them knows how much money and power is up for grabs. This is all about pulling everyone above you down as much as climbing up. If someone tries to broker a peace deal, they need to sabotage it, or risk losing the big prize for themselves.
75
FunResident6220 3 days ago +20
Chaos is a ladder
20
TheRealistoftheReal 3 days ago +10
Love is a battlefield…
10
TymeSefariInc 3 days ago +7
Avoiding STDs was my own personal Vietnam.
7
Finmail 3 days ago +3
That’s a sentence, I wasn’t expecting to read. Save some for the rest of us?
3
silencerider 3 days ago +6
Never saw that Trump quote?
6
fury420 3 days ago +2
"but the Persians are great negotiators, the Iranians are great negotiators, so, and they, they just killed, they just killed us, this is horrible." Also Donald Trump, from that infamous rant about nuclear and his uncle at MIT and his very good genes.
2
Luciifuge 3 days ago +2
And probably a lot of factions with factions within the igrc. A lot of generals or others jockeying for power. We won’t know the specific until months after all this is over
2
Asterix85 3 days ago +1
Their turning each other in to mossad assassins in the name of their own greed
1
Lemon_Club 3 days ago +7
Well they can win insofar as forcing the United States to withdraw because its too costly for Trump both economically and politically, if you count that as a win. Thats obviously what they're gunning for.
7
Madame_Arcati 3 days ago -3
So, ALL "leaders" driving this (criminally instigated by trump) war are perpetuating it...in order to stay out of prison, ALL of them.
-3
Wooden-Variety175 3 days ago +2
Yes there is no good or bad side in these conflicts. Just power hungry politicians and the civilians caught in the middle.
2
giboauja 3 days ago +6
Whaaaa the IRGC?! Nooooooo.
6
whopops 3 days ago +10
It's literally their purpose.
10
IntelArtiGen 3 days ago +72
I wouldn't be surprised if it was true, but obviously it's an israeli media so it might be a bit "biased".
72
SilveryDeath 3 days ago +44
No only that, but this is Israeli media citing Iran International, an outlet based in London that actively promotes former Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi as the next ruler of Iran. Not saying that this can't be true, but I'd take it with a grain of salt.
44
GraveDiggingCynic 3 days ago +5
Even if it’s true, it’s exactly what was predicted, that the war would only entrench the hardliners. This is a classic Praetorian problem, by wiping out any credible rulers, the IRGC is now in the position to pick whomever they want.
5
Slatedtoprone 3 days ago +9
This was always the problem with any “negotiations.” The people willing to talk aren’t the same people with the guns and missiles. Unless the Iranian army is going to to fight the IIRG, then nothing will change and Iran will become broken into fiefdoms ruled by former IIRGC warlords that will be a breeding ground for terrorists.
9
LupusDeiEl 3 days ago +3
Noooo how could a literal cult milita do that.
3
SpongeSlobb 3 days ago +4
Didn’t they give IRGC commanders full autonomy to respond to the US/Israeli attacks however they see fit? This is a “putting the toothpaste back in the tube” situation.
4
fundiedundie 3 days ago +19
Keep in mind that this “news” is coming from an Israeli media company. Meaning this could likely be propaganda. Contact info for the site: Ynetnews 1 Noah Mozes St, Rishon Lezion, 7565234, Israel
19
SnooRegrets6428 3 days ago +2
The goal for both side is to eliminate Vahidi. With him still controlling the irgc, this war won’t end
2
rdtusrname 3 days ago +2
Only respect for Pezeshkian!
2
Iyellkhan 3 days ago +2
its almost like its a bad idea to let militaries have their own revenue streams separate from the rest of the state.
2
Witty_Formal7305 3 days ago +3
Not surprising, the IRGC only answers to the Ayatollah who is reportedly in a coma and when the war started they decentralized their command and control giving individual IRGC commanders / regions / whatever they call them more authority it act on their own to make it harder for the U.S / Israel to take out the command structure & stop attacks.
3
[deleted] 3 days ago +6
[deleted]
6
ScientistNo906 3 days ago +8
Good question. Nobody talks about them. They are the only countervailing force and appear to be sitting things out for now.
8
legbreaker 3 days ago +3
I heard IRGC sent most of them home from bases. So they couldn’t organize
3
Sens1r 3 days ago +1
Don't think they're organized or strong enough to do much at this point, maybe if the IRGC fractures they could have a meaningful role.
1
V-Right_In_2-V 3 days ago +4
It’s hard for anyone to know what’s going on, but I suspect the IRGC has been getting first dibs on the good weapon systems while the Artesh was left with scraps. There’s hardly been any word on what’s going on with the army of Iran. I haven’t really seen anyone from the Artesh even making comments. They are basically ghosts at this point
4
NotAnotherEmpire 3 days ago +1
If not just propaganda, it's not "rogue." The IRGC is not a "civilian control of the military" organization. As the name implies, they guard the Islamic Revolution. They're *supposed* to "deal" with anyone who is counterrevolutionary "liberal," among other enemies. 
1
Alert-Algae-6674 3 days ago +1
The regular Iranian military is led at the top by IRGC appointees. They are also much less funded than the IRGC and have less power overall
1
Different_Victory_89 3 days ago
A military coup? Who could have predicted this outcome? /s
0
Youngsweppy 3 days ago +5
It wouldn’t be a military coup, it would be the government regaining order from the extremist faction inside the country.
5
nvbtable 3 days ago +4
More like the extremist faction gaining control from the other extremist faction
4
dringer 3 days ago +1
I dont think its a coup i think its by design. Iran needed horizontal leadership that could retain control if their leadership was assassinated. Also as much as western media disagrees or propagandizes, the former ayatollah was more restrained than many in the IRGC and even made proclamations that nuclear weapons go against Islam.
1
seclifered 3 days ago +4
This is the logical result of a decapitation strike and why they are rarely used if you want a quick war. No one is truly in charge and the fighting never ends.
4
trashwang710 3 days ago +4
Israeli media
4
FinalVendetta 3 days ago +3
Corrected sentence: Iran's president accuses IRGC commanders + listnook liberals of undermining ceasefire efforts
3
SeaworthinessSome454 3 days ago +4
Team up with the us and give up your nuclear program, then kick the IRGC out together. Best case scenario right now
4
xmuskorx 3 days ago -12
What?  Listnook told me that Iran is winning and faces zero problems from this war whatsoever...
-12
_TheHighlander 3 days ago +18
Actually I think you’ll find most of us have decided we’re all losers.
18
thereoncewasahat 3 days ago -3
Apart from Israel; they're loving all this.
-3
HaroldHood 3 days ago +12
They have been targeted by Iran and associated militias for 40 years. I don’t think they will love it until the Iranian regime is over.
12
badpeoria 3 days ago +8
this guy thinks .... not a lot but he thinks
8
SamuraiCook 3 days ago +50
Generic, "all of Listnook hive mind believes the same straw man argument" comment.  Good for you.
50
FamousVillage1890 3 days ago +12
Might want to fix your own brain, bro. Don't blame listnook.
12
ruskyandrei 3 days ago +20
Because we all know an Israeli news site claiming to have inside info about how "Iran's economy is nearing collapse" is a super reliable source. Think we heard several variations of that over the years about both Ukraine and Russia
20
xmuskorx 3 days ago +2
Ohh, right but whenever Iran state media says something like "We are totally winning and are prepared to fight forever," you surely apply the same level of scepticism.  Right?
2
Anyales 3 days ago +13
Ahh yes this excellent and reliable news source must be right because it supports your already established views.
13
Lurkin605 3 days ago -3
How is that different from you, or anyone else for that matter?
-3
Anyales 3 days ago
If you have hundreds of news organisations reporting one thing and one inherently biased propaganda rag reporting the opposite then its not a both sides argument.
0
xmuskorx 3 days ago +2
One hundred organizations simply reprinting the same Iran State media statement does not lend that statement any more credence 
2
Select-Elevator-6680 3 days ago +2
Except it’s not “hundreds of new organizations reporting one thing”. It’s Listnook constantly making the “Iran winning, US losing” claim. Not the news.
2
Anyales 3 days ago +2
You think the US is winning? Winning what? What are the goals that you think America and Israel have set and achived that consitutes a win? Same government rules in Iran, Iran has their sanctions lifted, and Iran now has a chokehold on the global economy.  If the war ends tomorrow how would you describe this as a win for the US? 
2
EducationMental648 3 days ago -2
Who the hell is saying Iran is winning? What they’re saying is that it’s a stupid war, no one wants it, and Trump looks like an a corrupt idiot who contradicts himself and manipulates the markets.
-2
-Lets-Get-Weird- 3 days ago -4
I think it’s a you problem….  I haven’t read anywhere that Iran is winning unless you’re talking about the AI propaganda.  Which is clearly sarcastic.  The fact is that we’re all losing.  
-4
Select-Elevator-6680 3 days ago +1
You are the one who responded to: >>What?  Listnook told me that Iran is winning and faces zero problems from this war whatsoever... >> Ahh yes this excellent and reliable news source must be right because it supports your already established views. >> How is that different from you, or anyone else for that matter? With “If you have hundreds of news organizations reporting one thing and one inherently based propaganda rag reporting the opposite”. But sure, the implication isn’t clearly that “Iran winning, US losing.” The average reader is just too dumb to understand your complex statement? 🙄
1
Lurkin605 3 days ago -2
You're changing the subject, and responding to something you're making up.
-2
Anyales 3 days ago
I was clear and responded to you directly
0
Select-Elevator-6680 3 days ago
You might have been “clear”, but you keep shifting goal posts to avoid *responding directly* to being called out for making shit up.
0
Anyales 3 days ago
Sure
0
MrDerpGently 3 days ago +1
Do you think that Iran's civilian government losing all control of the IRGC is going to make them more likely to deescalate? Nobody thinks that living under constant missile bombardment while what's left of your food and water dwindles to nothing is 'zero problems'.
1
xmuskorx 3 days ago +2
It's more likely to make their whole political system collapse sooner or later.
2
MrDerpGently 3 days ago +1
If it's not 'sooner' it's neither going to end the war, nor will it improve regional stability. And that's assuming you don't have unit commanders building improvised dirty bombs to meet the 12th Imam in style.  (Sorry, the tone of that was more confrontational than I intended).
1
Expando3 3 days ago +1
What are the Polymarket odds?
1
queeso 3 days ago -3
You took one title from a Israeli outlet as fact 😑
-3
GeshtiannaSG 3 days ago
An easy way to tell who’s winning is to examine the quote, “open the fuckin’ strait, you crazy bastards”.
0
xmuskorx 3 days ago
An ability to perform terror attacks on civilian ships is not really a good indicator or internal political and economical issues Iran is facing. This is exactly miopia I am talking about. It's also funny how in this very same thread people told me "you are exaggerating no one is saying Iran is winning." Lol.
0
GeshtiannaSG 3 days ago
Most countries have just accepted it, they’re all making their own deals, each one further legitimising Iran’s control. France used their first veto since 1989 in favour of Iran, while the future of NATO is the shakiest it has ever been. Just like Vietnam, losing every battle doesn’t mean losing the war.
0
SirArthurPT 3 days ago +1
Someone skipped the history of pretorian guards and janissaries when came up with the ideia of a similar army...
1
krneki534 3 days ago +1
no one steers this ship anymore, it's all local warlords trying to stay alive and in power
1
annular_rash 3 days ago +1
So now the IRGC isn't supported by the government. Mission accomplished.
1
PapaCaqu 3 days ago +1
If only there was an intelligence agency that could’ve predicted this
1
AP_in_Indy 3 days ago +1
If this is the case, how do you meaningfully disrupt the IRGC (leadership, economic capabilities, ability to coordinate, etc) and shift power to the civilian government?
1
UseBackground2370 3 days ago +1
It's cute that anyone here thinks there is a difference between any of these people (the "civilian" government, which lol, and the IRGC). They're all cut from the same cloth of the islamic republic. As long as there is that islamic part involved, meaning this is a religious state with Sharia law, nothing will change. IRGC is the terrorist arm of the islamic republic and the government (as in the president and parliament) is the world facing front that pretends to be moderate and not terorrists.  Yet...they are all in this together. They cannot function without one another. There is no IRGC without the government and there is no government without the IRGC.  And Pezeshkian is an absolute joke. He basically has the same level of influence as a taxi driver, and the taxi driver is probably much smarter and more capable than him too and has more knowledge and better ideas. 
1
Jerry-Beans 2 days ago +1
Take them into your f****** country then. To try and frame Bombing people as saving them? Thats uniquely American. And Yeah sorry no - we see through your shit now. You werent liberating the Vietnamese. You werent liberating the Afghans. Youre not Liberating the Iranians. You’re terrorists.
1
ClarkNova80 3 days ago
Welp there it is. Today’s spin for the f****** algos.
0
marianass 3 days ago
The source sounds suspicious..... Iran International is owned by Volant Media UK Ltd, a London-based company. While the channel has stated its funding comes from private individuals, a 2018 Guardian investigation and other reports have linked its financing to Saudi Arabian sources, specifically through a Saudi-British citizen named Adel Abdulkarim
0
Strafalot 3 days ago +1
You’re right about the source and additionally the article claims it’s only inside reports of people close to the president without really establishing the legitimacy of the source. While this could very well be true I don’t understand why Listnook allows this publication but is highly suspicious of so many others.
1
[deleted] 3 days ago
[deleted]
0
X211499Reddit 3 days ago +5
President is not supreme leader
5
Classic-Jello-1234 3 days ago +7
The president and the ayatolah are not the same person. How the f*** do you not know the basics after a month of this war.
7
i_did_nothing_ 3 days ago +3
People are choosing to be ignorant at this point.
3
steven4869 3 days ago +1
That's President Pezenski, Supreme Leader is Mojtaba Khomenei. Both are different and the latter has supreme power.
1
← Back to Board