· 133 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 11, 2026 at 4:51 PM

Report: US-Iran talks hit stalemate over Strait of Hormuz

Posted by Affectionate_Bee6434


Report: US-Iran talks hit stalemate over Strait of Hormuz
ynetglobal
Report: US-Iran talks hit stalemate over Strait of Hormuz
Iranian state media says negotiations have been ongoing for several hours and are continuing, with experts from both sides now exchanging written texts after completing one round of direct discussions

🚩 Report this post

133 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
wdomeika 1 day ago +875
TL:DR... Iran wants to set up EZ Pass for the Strait of Hormuz.
875
save-aiur 1 day ago +224
Trump no doubt wants a cut
224
TuctDape 1 day ago +107
We don't need to speculate, he has said as much
107
jinzokan 1 day ago +25
I know it's his whole thing but it's crazy how he just says the blatantly corrupt things and it's just fine.
25
Obvious_Toe_3006 1 day ago +51
A Trump Golden Passage Card.
51
Frodojj 1 day ago +63
Btw, why do we even need EZ Pass transponders anymore? The Turnpike is already automated. Surely the license plate cameras are cheaper and less wasteful than the rfid transponders that need batteries. (I thought there was rfid technology that didn’t need a battery too. That’s how credit cards work.)
63
crazedizzled 1 day ago +53
Credit cards work because the reader induces current, powering the circuitry.
53
Frodojj 1 day ago +9
Exactly. That is possible for longer ranges too.
9
Nemo222 1 day ago +19
It's a lot harder at longer ranges and causes other issues. We all saw the lunatics freaking out over 5g, imagine the outrage when somebody runs a story about toll receivers broadcasting with a few orders of magnitude higher power flux
19
Nessie_of_the_Loch 1 day ago +16
Because they don't want to have to chase you down for payment.
16
ajd660 1 day ago +17
At least in Texas you can go through a toll and they just bill the license plate holder. The fee costs more than if you just have ez pass though. About 6 years ago though I did get a bill from the New York transit authority for a toll even though I have never been to New York so the cameras are not infallible
17
Durakan 1 day ago +10
The EZ Pass in Washington state uses long range RFID, no batteries required. But upgrading an existing system is like expensive, and time consuming.
10
TriflingHotDogVendor 1 day ago +7
They already do this in Pennsylvania. Toll booths are being removed completely. Toll-by-plate being instituted.
7
huskypuppers 1 day ago +5
Canadian who lives near the 407 toll route, I've had a transponder account since about 2011 (I think, might actually be 2008/2009) and only had to get a replacement once in that time period, and they preemptively sent it out. Those batteries last a looooong time, it is probably cheaper than automated cameras where human intervention is required even a small % of the time (especially with the weather we get where license plates regularly end up partially obstructed with snow/slush on a regular basis)
5
Environmental-Car481 1 day ago +3
I live in the state without toll roads, but drove through one last week. Why do I have to take a ticket? Why not just roll through and let the license plate reader do it thing? I get to my exit, it reads my license plate again and shows the fee.
3
lkodl 1 day ago +3
Credit cards are NFC not RFID, and use magnetic fields instead of radio waves. The downside/benefit is that you have be physically close to the transponder to activate it. Downside for tollbooths / benefit for credit cards.
3
Frodojj 1 day ago +2
Ah I see. It seems like they use battery-less technology in Washington state though!
2
Gavangus 1 day ago +3
Many of the toll tags that are not ez pass are just stickers with a little chip that goes on your windshield
3
RynoRama 1 day ago +3
Automate EZpass, Automate draft registration, Jump through hoops on one leg on a thursday when it's raining for voter registration.
3
alexefi 1 day ago +1
Probably "convenien¹ce fee". We have toll highway amd if no transponder you pay much higher price, because "cameras, pulling your infro from data base, sending you mail" and there is chance you can just not pay. Its private entity and all they can do is to affect your credit score. But with transponder you they already got you. Plus if you dont use highway because you were out of town or just dont need, they still get cut from transponder fee
1
lostroadrunner22 1 day ago +12
Somebody better go back and get a shitload of dimes.
12
NCDERP22 1 day ago +4
Maybe Iran could start selling Iran Gold Cards for 2 million USD for guaranteed Hormuz safe passage.
4
HP844182 1 day ago +2
Split it 3 ways between Iran/Omen/US and you got a deal
2
Affectionate_Bee6434 1 day ago +45
Oman said that they would not accept a toll in the Hormuz
45
Isak531 1 day ago +26
Yeah but what about Omen?
26
lyonellaughingstorm 1 day ago +32
Not just the Omen, but the Owomen, and the Ochildren too.
32
Late_Faithlessness24 1 day ago +6
Why Owoman is not included in this talks?
6
PhilipVancouver 1 day ago +1
Only one woman though?
1
GlobalTravelR 1 day ago +2
Damien Thorne supports this idea.
2
XASASSIN 1 day ago +12
Lol why would they split with the US when the purpose of the toll is to recoup losses they've had till date.
12
SuperRockyHobbyHorse 1 day ago +2
Why should the rest of the world pay anyone extra for something they were getting for free a month ago? You think the rest of the world won't make the US pay that cost in other ways and then some?
2
Thirsty799 1 day ago +299
so, no progress
299
SonOfMcGee 1 day ago +51
NO! They’re merely at a stalemate over the Strait of Hormuz. You know, the singular issue they came to talk about?
51
PoppingPillls 1 day ago +1
Because trumo refuses to just admit he fucked up pay for damages and reinstate the nuclear power agreement. Otherwise it would be one by now.
1
I_Push_Buttonz 1 day ago +9
Well just yesterday the press was reporting that Iran wouldn't negotiate so long as Israel was in Lebanon. Days before that they were reporting Iran saying it would never agree to as ceasefire with the US. A week or two ago they were reporting Iran saying it would never negotiate with the US under any circumstances. Etc. I'd say tremendous progress as been made.
9
LapsedVerneGagKnee 1 day ago +328
That didn’t take long.
328
RidgedLines 1 day ago +75
More market manipulation incoming
75
PassionLong9552 1 day ago +7
I think the market is over this man child. Doubt it returns to the recent lows.
7
LSDemon 1 day ago +1
lmao, those ain't the lows
1
Conan-Da-Barbarian 1 day ago +240
They are both just dragging this out so they can both get more bombs and missiles. China is sending Iran weapons and the USA is probably shifting resources.
240
RedIndianRobin 1 day ago +46
CENTCOM has just started clearing mines in the strait though: >TAMPA, Fla. — U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) forces began setting conditions for clearing mines in the Strait of Hormuz, April 11, as two U.S. Navy guided-missile destroyers conducted operations. >USS Frank E. Peterson (DDG 121) and USS Michael Murphy (DDG 112) transited the Strait of Hormuz and operated in the Arabian Gulf as part of a broader mission to ensure the strait is fully clear of sea mines previously laid by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps. “Today, we began the process of establishing a new passage and we will share this safe pathway with the maritime industry soon to encourage the free flow of commerce,” said Adm. Brad Cooper, commander of CENTCOM. >The Strait of Hormuz is an international sea passage and an essential trade corridor that supports regional and global economic prosperity. Additional U.S. forces, including underwater drones, will join the clearance effort in the coming days.
46
platinumarks 1 day ago +74
Iran has already been publishing maps of where the mines are. The mines aren't the big risk to ships. It's the rockets and drones.
74
redfoobar 1 day ago +100
AFAIK the mine “maps” are published to force maritime traffic into a different route close to the Iranian shore where they can easily control all traffic. They don’t even need to actually mine the other routes, just saying they are mined/publishing a map with “danger mines” on it is enough that no ship will go near that area.
100
NATOuk 1 day ago +20
Exactly, the threat of mines is enough to make the insurance companies refuse cover
20
MessMaximum5493 1 day ago +7
Setting conditions is not the same as starting lol besides of all the ships hit none of them were because of mines. Idk what's with the obsession with mines. Clearing the mines isn't going to open the strait
7
lizardtrench 1 day ago +12
It would be more accurate to say that we sent a couple non-minesweepers into the strait to say, 'hey, we're here, I dare you to try something' and double check that Iran wouldn't respond to our usage of the strait. With that out of the way, looks like we're going to try to move things up another notch and attempt some actual minesweeping in a few days and see how that goes.
12
Donny-Moscow 1 day ago +1
Yeah idk a lot about Navy operations so I assume there is something that’s going over my head. But why are we using destroyers as minesweepers?
1
lizardtrench 1 day ago +3
We basically weren't actually trying to sweep for mines there, we were just doing our usual 'Freedom of navigation' enforcement. Which is us simply using a waterway with our big scary ships to show that it's open for travel, and that anyone trying to contest that would have to deal with said big scary ship.
3
HalfADozenOfAnother 1 day ago +9
I've said it multiple times. The U.S and Israel will turn Iran into a smoldering pile of rubble and sacrifice hundreds of thousands of lives before they'll let them control the Strait long term. China will sacrifice how ever many yuans and however many hundreds of thousands of Iranian lives to watch the U.S do it. Either way though it will end with the complete description of Iran of they don't open the Strait along with however many thousands of U.S soldiers need to die along the way
9
happy_snowy_owl 1 day ago +7
Idk man... I think that Trump is keenly aware that Americans like quick victories and has no desire to get into a quagmire with Iran.
7
HalfADozenOfAnother 1 day ago +13
I don't think Trump is keenly aware of much and has lost all control of what's going on. The population can like and desire whatever they want. This has spiraled to a point of no turning back. The U.S has backed itself into as much of a corner as Iran's in. The Strait can't be handed to Iran. That wouldn't end the war. It's not going to be acceptable to any country in the Persian gulf besides Iran. I do think they're going to get to a point that they want a quick victory and that's the scariest part. A complete bombardment of iran with little regard to civilian life. People say you cant regime change with air superiority alone. That's true. If you don't care about regime change or civilian life you can bomb a nation to the point that it can't function and the people are more concerned with their next slice of bread and bottle of water than a boat is in the ocean
13
TurbulentPromise4812 1 day ago +83
Already? No, wow really? Already?
83
redditobserverone 1 day ago +9
The walk across the red carpet lasted longer than the peace. The FIFA Peace Laureate delivers peace all over the world upwards of several minutes at a time.
9
Kaffe-Mumriken 1 day ago +68
Vance started rambling about footstools and ottomans
68
Used-Examination1439 1 day ago +21
Vance is worried about couch production
21
yupgup12 1 day ago +4
Vance was able to strong-arm Iran into adding a proviso allowing free passage of couch and couch related products.
4
lyonellaughingstorm 1 day ago +2
Maybe he’s exploring his feelings a little by getting into Persian rugs?
2
Zomunieo 1 day ago +5
Let’s see we’ll have some strait of Hormuz unblocking, uranium enrichment ban, whatever makes sense.
5
Jae_Rides_Apes 1 day ago +153
So Hormuz, enrichment, and Lebanon are all non-starters for the US? This seems to be going swimmingly.
153
agarwaen117 1 day ago +96
And this admin is used to Demanding everything, getting nothing, compromising on nothing and then walking away while accepting every loss. Then claiming they did everything they could and won bigly.
96
enigmaticowl 1 day ago +26
Not just non-starters for the U.S., but non-starters for many others, as well. Hormuz: •it’s international waters (not Iranian waters) •Iran is not even the only nearby country, so it has no unique (let alone legitimate) claim to the Strait •the vast majority of the rest of the world is not okay with setting a precedent of having to pay millions or billions of dollars to any actor (whether it’s a government, a regime, a militia, a terrorist group, etc.) that just so happens to be close enough to international waters that they’re able to launch a drone or rocket at tankers or ships - they might not want to get militarily involved to stop it, but they sure as hell are not okay with it Enrichment: •there is overwhelming agreement across countries (and within most of the West, Israel, and the Gulf, who are the most directly threatened) that it’s not acceptable for Iran to pursue enrichment in light of their decades-long history of promising mass destruction and death to multiple other countries (along with funding and coordinating mass casualty terror attacks through their state proxies) •they’ve been caught violating conditions of previous agreements (exceeding enrichment and having undeclared/hidden facilities) and it’s also just come to light that they’ve been lying about their maximum missile range (progress toward ICBMs) •much of the basis for “deterrence” (of nuclear warfare) hinges entirely upon the concept of “mutually assured destruction” - that doesn’t play well with radical clerics and mullahs who think that life is a pre-show for the all-important afterlife (the best privileges of which are reserved for those who die as “martyrs”/in war) •it would be a massive setback to regional and global nonproliferation efforts since other Gulf states have stated that they feel they would have no choice but to obtain their own nuclear weapons Lebanon: •the vast majority of Lebanese citizens want Hezbollah to be disarmed (79% as of late 2025 polling) •even the Lebanese government itself has repeatedly agreed to disarm Hezbollah as part of past peace agreements, but they’ve made zero progress toward doing so, so they’re in breach (and have been for quite awhile, actually) •the Lebanese government has tried to cut ties with Iran/IRGC and remove IRGC officials from their country (which Iran refuses to respect) - *they* themselves don’t want IRGC’s influence (or the instability and casualties that it brings) •no state/regime has the right to establish, train, direct, fund, and command a militia/terror group in another country, especially a country where the vast majority of citizens (and government officials) want them gone - this isn’t just the Iranian government throwing some cash/guns to a rebel group, they literally *are* Hezbollah (except for the expendable rank-and-file), as they provide over 80% of their funding and essentially all of their intelligence/cash/weapons/direction through elaborate, expensive smuggling operations via the IRGC Quds Force •Iran provides a minimum of hundreds of millions (sometimes up to *tens of billions*) of USD in funding (to Hezbollah and other proxies combined) *each year*, and has for many years, all while Iranian infrastructure and society have crumbled and Tehran runs out of water (well before this war) - the Iranian people themselves would overwhelmingly like their government/money to gtfo of Lebanon (and everywhere else), but they can’t say it without being shot in the streets or hanged from a crane
26
TonyhawksPo-Tater 1 day ago +5
I mean, Iran should lose Hezbollah in Lebanon. They just use it to torment Israel and couldn't give two fucks about the Lebanese people who live there.
5
Jae_Rides_Apes 1 day ago +4
Agreed. Israel also doesn’t act in good faith that Hezbollah and the Lebanese are completely separate entities. Having “sleeper” cells in civilian populations, and having religious groups **in** government are absolutely fucked propositions regardless of name or nation.
4
Thurak0 1 day ago +13
Why the U.S. and Israel are giving Iran the chance to present themselves as the protectors of Lebanon is beyond me.
13
Dongsquad420Loki 1 day ago +46
Lebanon already expelled Iranian officials and made the, irgc illegal in their country. Iran doesn't listen to the Lebanese government when they told them to leave, it is only about hezbollah
46
NC16inthehouse 1 day ago +3
its basically going back to the status quo before Israel/US bombed Iran
3
buttgers 1 day ago +2
If only there were already a deal in place and everyone could travel through the Strait of Hormuz without issue that didn't need a war to trigger any dissatisfaction in said deal
2
Jae_Rides_Apes 1 day ago +1
#IfOnly 🤦
1
closing-the-thread 1 day ago +49
To war it is…again.
49
procheeseburger 1 day ago +10
Can we tariff the war?
10
Rambler_Hoss 1 day ago +48
Trump's going to lie to say the opposite and then Axios will do another "according to officials" source on Monday to pump the markets. The negotiation doesn't seem to matter as long as they act like they're negotiating.
48
copperblood 1 day ago +43
Trump is so going to throw JD Vance under the bus. As always, Trump will look for someone else to blame for his actions. Textbook malignant narcissism.
43
Head-Professor-61 1 day ago +10
Always possible that Iran see negotiating with Vance as an opportunity to throw Trump under the bus 😂
10
Jamie235 1 day ago +9
Willing to bet the US position is that they want a slice of the toll pie...
9
Bubbly_Sort849 1 day ago +15
New updates coming out of Pakistan that talks didn’t go anywhere really and Pakistan is trying to encourage a second day of talks
15
Rustic_gan123 1 day ago +3
The negotiations were doomed to failure from the start.
3
Bubbly_Sort849 1 day ago +2
Trump doesn’t like not being in the spotlight so he may be getting testy with ships in Hormuz
2
YqlUrbanist 1 day ago +7
So like... the main thing they need to talk about?
7
FluxMool 1 day ago +4
I guess I'll fill up my car now before things jump another 50 cents this coming week.
4
nkplague 1 day ago +4
Maybe they weren't wearing suits.
4
[deleted] 1 day ago +7
[deleted]
7
Bubbly_Sort849 1 day ago +2
Honestly Vance has been against this war behind the scenes. We can say all the jokes we want but he’s in a difficult spot between Trump and his own personal positions on these matters.
2
BrainOnLoan 1 day ago +3
I have no sympathy with all the bootlickers hitching their wagon to Trump. He chose that path, knowing full well who he's working for, so he's got to take the bullshit and deal with it.
3
AssassinAragorn 1 day ago +4
He reaps what he sowed
4
jphamlore 1 day ago +7
I am shocked, shocked, that an agreement cannot be made for Iran to surrender its only leverage.
7
InfiniteNerve1384 1 day ago +3
What’d that take, 3 hours?
3
Rinbox 1 day ago +3
That didn’t take long
3
xjuggernaughtx 1 day ago +3
But...but...but... how could that be with amazing deal-maker Trump at the table?!
3
14X8000m 1 day ago +4
Art of the deal. Now backtrack, accept a worse situation than you originally had, declare success.
4
_THEWATERB0Y_ 1 day ago +4
There is no diplomatic solution to the Strait of Hormuz I’m afraid. It’s the only card Iran holds and they can’t give it up.
4
TheOtherPete 1 day ago +4
I love the media that describes the situation as "Iran controls the Strait" Being able to deny access to something is not the same as controlling it, otherwise any country that borders the Strait could do the same as Iran and claim control.
4
rhino369 1 day ago +3
Shit any nation with a missile destroyer or submarine can light up an oil tanker in the strait. 
3
karsh36 1 day ago +5
This is why this was done on Saturday instead of yesterday. They knew it would be bad for the stock market.
5
Micksar 1 day ago +7
US helped Iran find the ace up their sleeve with Hormuz. Have the world’s economy by the short and curlies. Oh… and it’s the same regime… lol.
7
ResortClear730 1 day ago +5
Who could have seen this coming.
5
trebuchetwarmachine 1 day ago +2
Isnt that the main talking point?
2
joelfarris 1 day ago +2
_SURPRISE!_
2
healthyitch 1 day ago +2
About 9 pm Sunday evening, agreement will be reached. That gives Trump team 3 hours of futures and after hours buying prior to announcement. Then sell Monday morning at 9:31 am.
2
trippknightly 1 day ago +3
Shocking.
3
Moist-muff 1 day ago +2
Well ya.. when you hire JD ifuckacouch Vance to the meeting
2
Bubbly_Sort849 1 day ago +7
News from central command 2 minutes ago says US Ships have officially started the mission of clearing mines out, so I think this isn’t accurate news.
7
Affectionate_Bee6434 1 day ago +23
Lots of contradicting news regarding that event to be honest.
23
Bubbly_Sort849 1 day ago +6
Conflicting reports also that US unfreezing Iran assets
6
Euro_verbudget 1 day ago +2
Oh what?!?! I thought it was one of the first concessions to maintain the talks. So much conflicting information - it’s a good thing that the negotiations are taking place while all stock exchanges are closed.
2
Bubbly_Sort849 1 day ago +1
Of course that’s a given with trump and his inside traders
1
Euro_verbudget 1 day ago +2
This morning, I was thinking that leaders of the Iranian regime could join Trump’s inside traders and really make bank by issuing a succession of aligned statements for the next few months - negotiations off, war on; great progress, war on hold. BlackRock and Vanguard would quickly market their Ayatollah ETF, AYTA or other trendy ticker - everyone would make money… except us, peasants, crushed by gasoline prices and inflation.
2
m2845 1 day ago +9
Bold emphasis in below quote is mine, no pun intended. "U.S. Forces Start Mine Clearance Mission in Strait of Hormuz TAMPA, Fla. — U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) forces **began setting conditions for clearing mines** in the Strait of Hormuz, April 11, as two U.S. Navy guided-missile destroyers conducted operations. USS..." [https://imgur.com/a/gwqIdKE](https://imgur.com/a/gwqIdKE) Full post: [https://imgur.com/a/GtiVMvh](https://imgur.com/a/GtiVMvh) via [https://x.com/CENTCOM/status/2043005033600479516](https://x.com/CENTCOM/status/2043005033600479516) Note that these new LCS ships doing the mine sweeping are - at least as reported by multiple journalistic sources citing experts and publicly available information such as from reports from the GAO - seemingly far less effective at mine sweeping as prior generational mine sweepers and haven't been proven in real world tests yet: [https://www.npr.org/2026/04/01/nx-s1-5766222/mines-persian-gulf-strait-navy-lcs](https://www.npr.org/2026/04/01/nx-s1-5766222/mines-persian-gulf-strait-navy-lcs) Lets hope that is a wakeup call to the U.S. Navy.
9
[deleted] 1 day ago +4
[deleted]
4
m2845 1 day ago +7
Lots of caveats to that news seemingly based on reporting, also note the "began setting the conditions for clearing mines" doesn't say they're clearing the mines yet.
7
ENODEBEE 1 day ago +6
Concepts of a mine clearing plan
6
articland05_reddit 1 day ago +8
the ships are warned by Iran to turn back
8
Bubbly_Sort849 1 day ago +4
There is always very conflicting information but central command is usually pretty accurate regarding active US missions.
4
YouCantSeeMe555 1 day ago +6
Maybe before Kegsbreath took over. The whole thing seems compromised to outsiders.
6
Bubbly_Sort849 1 day ago +2
Yes, but that was some time ago. Central command just released this information minutes ago.
2
AntitheistArchangel 1 day ago +2
How exactly does that contradict the article?
2
Raspberries-Are-Evil 1 day ago +4
Who could have predicted that guys with zero diplomatic experience and zero understanding of the Iranian people and their culture and language would be able to effectively engage in diplomacy...
4
HormuzVengeance 1 day ago +13
Correct, islamic republic is an occupying and illegitimate military junta without sovereignty that massacres its own people; speak Arabic when our language is Farsi; has tried to erase our culture and imposed islamo-fascism on us; and has been committing human rights violations on us for decades; and only in January indiscriminately massacred 30,000 of us in the streets in a span of days. No one hates the islamic republic more than Iranians. It’s no wonder the islamic republic can’t engage in diplomacy. Their eschatological belief is mahdiism and they’ve spent decades cultivating an empire of sadism and death, so diplomacy has not factored in there. Edit: Ah yes, downvoted for explaining the crimes against humanity of the islamic republic from an Iranian’s perspective with real examples of what they have done and highlighting its incompatibility with not just human coexistence but also specifically Iranian culture in response to the above poster. Fickle in your sense of misplaced justice, aren’t you all?
13
Heavy_Secret_203 1 day ago +2
Trump can't stop a war in 24 hours? No way! He said he stopped 8 wars and counting. 
2
Shaskakmat 1 day ago +4
How does Iran got a stalemate? Trump said he has all the cards? Maybe they played UNO?
4
GlobalTravelR 1 day ago +4
What's it been? 15 minutes of discussions already? J.D. such a shrewd negotiator. Or perhaps he got distracted by the couch in his hotel suite and is desperate for any excuse to get back to his room.
4
StrangeMan18 1 day ago +3
lol this war will drag on, Iran will be heavily damaged but not out of the fight, congress will either force a pullout or the republicans will lose massively come midterms and that will be the end of Trump’s fun little conqueror game
3
MuddydogNew 1 day ago +1
Trump and Republicans are going to absolutely try to interfere with election results to hold power.
1
Fancy_Exchange_9821 1 day ago +1
Sure, that’s why you need to make sure you and literally everyone you know goes out to vote in the midterms. Even working the polls is a start.
1
MuddydogNew 1 day ago +1
Absolutely.
1
trippknightly 1 day ago +2
Much can happen in the intervening.
2
Dark_World_Blues 1 day ago +3
I had a feeling that it wouldn't work considering IRGC's unrealistic demands even after being weakened this much. I guess it is back to bombing Iran by USA and Israel.
3
crozly 1 day ago +2
Didn’t see that coming 
2
bobj00 1 day ago +2
well duh.
2
Optimoprimo 1 day ago +2
Failed. The talks are failing. Thats what a stalemate means.
2
Pryoticus 1 day ago +2
Iran has a great opportunity to destroy what's left of Republicans' support in the US if they just hold out until November
2
HereticLaserHaggis 1 day ago +2
If there's a toll on one strait, then every strait is fair game. And if that happens we go back to the mercantile system.
2
faithOver 1 day ago +1
Helps my oil long I accidentally held over the weekend. 😅
1
Appropriate_Value122 1 day ago +1
They were always at a stalemate.
1
← Back to Board