Romanian socialists and far right topple government

I second this, and I voted for the dweeb.

Of course he is! He’s a politician!

Or he made a pact with the enemy to oust a popular, potential presidential candidate. In this case, it massively backfired and my guess is that he's finished politically once he's presidential term is up, in about 4 years.

roma?

Basically the country is close to bankruptcy. The past 35 years, the country was (almost) exclusively governed by populists from the PSD (Social Democrats) that, among others, took out loans and went into the country's emergency funds to increase government employee benefits and pensions while still having enough for them to steal, all in order for them to secure their spot long term. This got us to the point to which the guy that just got thrown out had to instantly take some very unpopular measures (cutting social benefits, increasing VAT, freezing salaries, etc.) in order to avoid the country being downgraded to Junk status. Then, for the past year, most of the measures were similarily unpopular because he had to govern with a minority government so he couldn't take any proper measures (like reforming the justice system or the tax collection system) because they wouldn't have been voted by a majority. For a big part of the country (that doesn't understand politics OR economics) the perception is that all he did was take from the poor, but nothing from the rich instead of going for the big ticket items. This culminates two weeks ago in PSD and the far right party AUR submitting a motion to dismiss the prime minister which got voted on yesterday and it passed. Basically, we're fucked and our country is most likely gonna go bankrupt in the next 2 years. We don't even have Greece's tourism appeal to hope that could save us.

And most of our imbeciles voters think the election of President is the most important thing to do and just sit on n they assess for parliament election ( where the power is).

Yeah this is a very common setup in countries that used to be Con Mons either independent or as a colony. The president is in theory a check on constitutional violations but in reality mostly acts as a diplomat and ceremonial head, can't really do anything without consulting the PM.

It's a shame, humans aren't inherently greedy and selfish, the desire to accrue power is a modern evolution of the desire to control territory necessary to provide for oneself and the tribe. You could argue for the selfish gene for humans have always taken care of their own naturally, there is prehistoric evidence of deformed humans living far beyond the years they would have without support, and in hunter gatherer societies. Even neanderthals cared for their sick: https://www.theguardian.com/science/article/2024/jun/26/fossil-of-neanderthal-child-with-downs-syndrome-hints-at-early-humans-compassion Obviously humans have dark traits, but the fact that we exist in a harsh world and still have the capacity for kindness and compassion has to speak for something. 

I'm not claiming it's the worst, merely the most individualistic. Monarchy, feudalism and warlord states tended to have community through shared belief systems such as religion. Secularist liberalism is great for individualism but terrible for community.