· 164 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 4, 2026 at 1:33 PM

Russia evacuates 198 more staff from Iran's Bushehr nuclear plant, agencies report

Posted by Dizzy_Industry1287



🚩 Report this post

164 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
Nd343343 6 days ago +1503
The entire nuclear plants staff appears to be Russians
1503
TachiH 6 days ago +115
It is a Russian built power plant so it makes a lot of sense for some of the more specialist staff to be Russians. Its also a fairly new plant in terms of how long its been operating (yes they started building in the 70s).
115
totallyRebb 6 days ago +484
Wonder how many of those "Russians" are actually important Iranian personnel they want to get out.
484
EquivalentSpot8292 6 days ago +120
Operation Iron Stapler!
120
Unspoken 6 days ago +12
Probably a few but Rosatom has contracts to run these plants.
12
williamgman 6 days ago +17
Bingo.
17
QuentinTarzantino 6 days ago +100
Iranian nationals cant/ or have always had a extremely hard time working or getting work in the field when it comes to academia etc. Even if they are best inntheir field. Russians never had that restriction against Iran. When it comes to Nuka talk. Also thats why many go under the guise as Russian. Its been going on for ages. Headline in OP post is utter propoganda BS. Yes, they have Russians working but the main majority are Persian. But use Russian passports when travelling. Cause, politics.
100
arup02 6 days ago +31
> Iranian nationals cant/ or have always had a extremely hard time working or getting work in the field when it comes to academia etc. Even if they are best inntheir field. Is this true, if so, why?
31
QuentinTarzantino 6 days ago +32
I think it was because the restrictions set ages ago. But there is always a loop hole. Many worked internationally, but used none Iranian passports. It was a guided thing. Travel from home xountry, but remember to go through Germany then this country then 3rd country which was a final destination. It technically became a Ok to work. I may be paraphrasing, cause its been several years since I heard it. But they had to be carefull. Many got caught cause they tried bringing family. Or got cauhht after the fact.
32
arup02 6 days ago +8
Interesting, thanks.
8
QuentinTarzantino 6 days ago +5
It was either the other country stops you, or your own country gets you. Hence why so many German Persians, it was way more linient. Please correct me if Im wrong.
5
Imbendo 6 days ago +8
Because their country is actively trying to make a nuclear bomb against the wishes of most of the world. Companies and universities dont want to take the risk being associated with anyone that could potentially lead to embarrassment for their establishment down the line.
8
gayphilantropist 6 days ago +4
Same reason why Trump going to war against "academia' regardless of silly some of it actually is, can and likely will have lasting consequences a generation from now.
4
SporksInjected 6 days ago +1
I would be too!
1
lostroadrunner22 6 days ago +203
Did we see graphite on the roof?
203
jay6432 6 days ago +71
The Russians collected it and are taking it home with them, don’t worry.
71
27Yosh 6 days ago +52
That's impossible, you're in shock, go to the infirmary
52
Xenotone 6 days ago +36
No we didn't because it's NOT THERE
36
Nailhimself 6 days ago +30
probably just burned concrete
30
hebbid 6 days ago +19
You see comrade, I may not know about graphite but I know a great deal about concrete
19
cench 6 days ago +21
You're confused. RBMK reactor cores don't explode.
21
Morstraut64 6 days ago +24
Is this a reference to Chernobyl?
24
spencer2294 6 days ago +12
It may be a reference to someone who dropped their mechanical pencil refill on a roof. Very frustrating situation. 
12
WesternTelevision579 6 days ago +2
Very common issue. Happens to me all the time.
2
Yvaelle 6 days ago +15
Yes, watch it if you haven't, everyone should watch it
15
Morstraut64 6 days ago +8
Ha, thank you. I have seen it but I'm a goldfish. I should watch it again
8
[deleted] 6 days ago +314
[removed]
314
CaptainCanuck93 6 days ago +222
It seems like they are expecting the USA is going to follow Russia's example in egregiously irresponsible bombing of a nuclear plant
222
TeaAndLifting 6 days ago +54
Trump is just following in his idol's footsteps
54
felis_scipio 6 days ago +10
More likely targeting the staff themselves
10
Ultra_Metal 6 days ago -49
Nobody is going to bomb the plant, that makes no sense from a military point of view. Russia is withdrawing because they likely think the regime is about to collapse and don't want their personnel to be caught in a dangerous situation.
-49
Chruman 6 days ago +18
The military campaign in Iran doesn't make sense from a military point of view either lmfao
18
duncanmarshall 6 days ago +16
>Nobody is going to bomb the plant, that makes no sense from a military point of view. You just convinced me Trump/Hegseth are going to do it.
16
CaptainCanuck93 6 days ago +40
Are you under the impression that the USA is only bombing military targets?
40
Ultra_Metal 6 days ago -80
I know for sure.
-80
inquisitive_guy_0_1 6 days ago +21
No, you don't. Stop lying.
21
DonnieTheYowie 6 days ago +19
Was the civilian bridge under construction a military target?
19
kirkyking 6 days ago +11
They’ve blown up a school, hospitals and also university. Surely you could’ve picked one of those instead of something which is pretty much a book example of a legitimate military target.
11
kurQl 6 days ago +1
Yes bridges do have military usage.
1
SirDiesel1803 6 days ago +21
They knowingly bombed a school. The school was marked as a school on Google maps. They never denied it was a school that was bombed. They tried to say it was Iran who bombed the school. However it was an american bomb and it was an american video of the bomb landing. How after years and years of sanctions would they get an american bomb?
21
SporksInjected 6 days ago
This is obviously very tragic but I think it’s fucked up that all the kids were buried in Iranian flag coffins in a mass grave. My kids were just murdered and I had no say in their funeral or where they’re buried just so the state can make a monument to the war. I can’t imagine if Bush required all the 9/11 victims be buried in this way.
0
Difficult_Mousse7976 6 days ago -27
Bullshit…you’re just regurgitating the terrorist regime propaganda. The school was a previous terrorist facility right next to an active military site. The regime is using Hamas strategy of operating within civilian enclaves. None of this matters anyways when Iran doesn’t even value the lives of its citizens. The regime is currently enrolling kids into the army and they have previously used kids to sweep land mines in past wars. Plus 30,000 protesters killed early this year with daily ongoing executions.
-27
Astralsketch 6 days ago +16
america literally admitted it so...
16
kurQl 6 days ago
When did US admitted "knowingly" attacking a school?
0
SirDiesel1803 6 days ago +19
I never said Iran was good. But they did blow up a school. It was on fox news and everything. On Google maps it was a school. Its not bullshit. Was it an accident? I f****** hope so. But jesus it was a school .
19
desba3347 6 days ago +4
It likely lies somewhere in the middle. Do I think the U.S. intentionally targeted a school? No. Do I think irresponsible negligence in intelligence caused those kids to die without the regime resorting to Hamas-like tactics in that instance? Also yes. Mistakes happen in all jobs, in war it causes innocent lives, that doesn’t mean investigation and accountability shouldn’t take place.
4
selfiecat 6 days ago +1
I've heard this type of justification somewhere, I wonder where it is
1
Toxic-Widow 6 days ago +14
How about the school 170+ kids that got killed by a triple tap bombing in Iran like a month ago?
14
jay6432 6 days ago -15
~110 children. That happened over a month ago, if you’re gonna use figures then make sure they’re accurate.
-15
Toxic-Widow 6 days ago +9
Right...that's why when you look up school bombing Iran all sources say 150+ killed but I have the wrong numbers...
9
skippy_smooth 6 days ago +6
Making sense? That stopped being a thing a while ago.
6
jqman69 6 days ago +17
No sense to bomb schools either but here we are
17
caboosetp 6 days ago +5
> Nobody is going to bomb the plant [They already bombed the plant complex.](https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/4/4/iaea-says-projectile-hits-near-irans-bushehr-nuclear-plant-killing-one) Not the reactor itself, but there was damage to buildings that house important things related to keeping the reactor online like cooling systems.
5
MuDDy_PaNDa 6 days ago +6
And the USA has only done actions that make sense from a military point of view in the last year? The problem is that you're still expecting them to do rational things. This is not 2010 USA anymore, we can't expect them anymore to do what is rational all the time.
6
tico42 6 days ago +2
Yes, because Russia historically cares about loss of life...
2
tellsyoutogetfucked 6 days ago +1
They are evacuating because the plant already got hit.
1
vmdvr 6 days ago +1
Didn't make military sense to bomb elementary schools, universities, hospitals, apartment buildings, civilian bridges in cities etc. But they all got bombed. Why not a nuclear power plant too?
1
BlipBlapBloppityBoop 6 days ago
I would completely expect them to reveal to the world that they’re as low as the Russians.
0
fullofspiders 6 days ago +11
Probably due to the US bombings. They probably don't want to be near the nuclear power plant when it melts down. That's widely considered to be a health risk.
11
IntelArtiGen 6 days ago +17
Maybe that staff was able to "see things". The US / Israel targeted places around the power plants multiple times I think, and it's possible the IRGC is using it to shield military activities. Russians did the same at ZNPP.
17
Hey-Froyo-9395 6 days ago +2
Wonder if the staff is taking as much material and equipment with them as they can carry
2
TachiH 6 days ago +1
America bombed the wider area of the plant already last night. This isn't a precaution, the site is at risk of being bit.
1
IntelArtiGen 6 days ago +319
Sounds like they're not optimistic about a quick end to the war.
319
MoreFeeYouS 6 days ago +150
Trump's 3 week operation reminded them of the specific 3 day operation.
150
DirkDigglersPenis 6 days ago +42
Problems come in 3’s
42
DaddyIngrosso 6 days ago +30
Valve would know
30
Dimhilion 6 days ago +4
Oohh cmon, thats just downright mean, to remind me like that :p
4
wlaugh29 6 days ago +10
According to my math, if a 3 day special military operation is on going for 4 years, this debacle should be a minimum of 28 years.
10
fence_sitter 6 days ago +3
That's a lot of Mooches.
3
ZuAusHierDa 6 days ago +2
How goes your math?
2
Johannes_P 6 days ago +4
Or that the war might end quickly yet the NPP might get further targeted.
4
PmMeCuteDogsThanks_ 6 days ago +2
Well Putin is kind of an expert on short invasions 
2
Ultra_Metal 6 days ago -11
Or they think the war will end quickly but with the collapse of the Islamic Republic and they don't want their personnel to be caught in a dangerous situation.
-11
duncanmarshall 6 days ago +15
I've seen absolutely no evidence that the regime is experiencing instability. Do you have links (from non-clownish sources) please?
15
raikou1988 6 days ago +9
They do not. Just opinions
9
Boring-Leadership687 6 days ago +2
Absolutely no evidence of instability? Really?? Its entire leadership getting wiped out isn’t instability???? What the heck is your definition of instability? The regime is unstable as f***. Surviving? Yes. But that does not mean it escaped instability
2
duncanmarshall 6 days ago +4
No, people dying is not instability of the regime. Instability would be some reason why the IRGC is losing control of the country.
4
daniel_22sss 6 days ago +1
I've seen videos, where local rebels stage attacks on iranian military vehicles. Does that count as instability?
1
duncanmarshall 6 days ago +1
How did you verify the videos?
1
daniel_22sss 6 days ago
Ghost of Khamelei personally came to me and verified it. Dufuq do you expect me to say?
0
duncanmarshall 6 days ago +2
Whatever you told yourself was the reason these videos are reliable, tell it to me.
2
Boring-Leadership687 6 days ago -5
You have a very weird definition of instability. Losing control of the country is collapse not simple instability
-5
Mighty__Monarch 6 days ago +1
Do you think Trump and his circle getting hit would cause the US to collapse? Thats just not how nations of tens of millions of people work man lmfao
1
Boring-Leadership687 6 days ago
No but it would definitely cause some instability in the government
0
IBM296 6 days ago +3
If the war was going to end quickly, it would have ended by now. It's been more than a month now. Get ready for higher oil prices.
3
SupaMonroeGuy 6 days ago +74
Well, now we know who was working what.
74
kivimango23 6 days ago +34
I think they are expecting ground invasion.
34
hawkseye17 6 days ago +11
at this point who isn't?
11
Mopstilltheend 6 days ago +2
Me to be honest. At most there‘ll be a couple of hundreds of special forces operating limited night strikes like the one we saw earlier today. Now full scale ground invasion like Afghanistan or Vietnam will happen in Iran.
2
44Stryker44 6 days ago +13
198 more? How many did they have to begin with?
13
BigDaddyDumperSquad 6 days ago +124
If Russian scientists composed that much of Iran's nuclear staff, I can only assume that they're helping the development of nuclear weaponry as well...
124
Maniactver 6 days ago +19
Iran and Russia have been cooperating with nuclear power plants for a long time, that's nothing new.
19
DataDude00 6 days ago +48
Russia has thousands of nukes. If they wanted Iran to have one they could have given them a few dozen
48
alexidhd 6 days ago +61
That’s not how a nuclear program works.
61
BigDaddyDumperSquad 6 days ago +38
Uhhh, no that's not how it works with nukes in 2026...
38
PsycheToker 6 days ago +36
Im assuming you mean legally… because Russia totally follows the rules. If they want to transfer nukes, they can.
36
Honest_Concentrate85 6 days ago +24
Yeah but if Russia just gives nukes to Iran than what’s stopping the UK, France, or US from doing the same for Ukraine
24
stromm 6 days ago +25
Nukes have a finger print that can be found after detonation. The major powers have shared their fingerprints as part of de-escalation and treaties. So if Russia gave anyone a nuke and that party used it, the world would know it can from Russia. If Russia helps Iran make their own, it’s hard to prove Russia was involved. Also, YES, regular nuclear power plants can enrich material for use in nuclear weapons.
25
demonica123 6 days ago +3
No one cares where a nuke came from. That's why MAD is MAD. The world dies if an ICBM is launched or there is any other force of nuclear launch.
3
stromm 4 days ago +1
What does Mothers Against Drugs have to do with nukes…
1
SufficientBity 6 days ago +6
Also, what's stopping Iran from using that nuke against Russia if their supreme leader wakes up on the wrong side of the bed in the morning.
6
PsycheToker 6 days ago +6
Ukraine had nukes, thats what was stopping Russia from launching a full scale invasion. They gave their nuclear weapons up to America for a protection deal, but we did not protect them.
6
ReasonablyBadass 5 days ago +1
I am pretty sure you can trace nukes nowadays. Meaning if Iran used one, Russia would be on the hook. Also, this assumes Russia wants them to have one, instead of stringing them along.
1
TachiH 6 days ago +16
That plant isn't remotely able to be used towards a nuclear weapon. There is a huge difference in being a specialist in civil and military nuclear engineering.
16
BigDaddyDumperSquad 6 days ago +5
That's not what was being said.
5
TachiH 6 days ago +6
The staff who help run power stations can't help make nukes. Iran wouldn't need Russian scientists to teach them how to make a bomb, they would just need the plans to make one. Russia wouldn't supply them staff as its pointless.
6
BigDaddyDumperSquad 6 days ago +4
Never said anything about the same staff being used for both. But if there are hundreds of Russian nuclear scientists working at their nuclear facilities, it can be assumed they also have many working on Iran's nuclear weapons programs. And it takes more than just a piece of paper showing how to make a nuclear warhead for the entire program to function.
4
TheEnglish1 6 days ago -2
That train of thought quite literally does not follow at all in any logical sense other than pure speculation.
-2
No_Iron_8087 6 days ago +96
So, Araghchi warns any radiation fallout will disproportionately poison the GCC nations, Russia evacuates staff. It sounds like something has happened, maybe a leak that’s become hard to contain? The IAEA’s response of “no increase in radiation levels” is beginning to sound a little like: “3.6 Roentgen, not great, not terrible”
96
WeddingPKM 6 days ago +69
IAEA is not the Soviet government, I wouldn’t expect them to act the same way if an issue has occurred.
69
Easy_Cancel5497 6 days ago +11
I expect all and any agencies to cover up shit until it spills out of the pampers
11
No_Iron_8087 6 days ago
My point isn’t that they’re actively covering up, I’m saying that by announcing immediately all is well, whilst on the ground the contrary appears to be the case, is similar to the “3.6 Roentgen” repetition.
0
TachiH 6 days ago +14
The Russians are leaving whilst nothing is wrong. If America bombs the plant and kills Russians then the people in Russia would demand a retaliation. Russia would absolutely recieve a warning from the US to remove its staff if there is a risk. You will know within an hour if there is a leak as there are publicly avaliable sensors online in the region that will alert if there is a leak.
14
jay6432 6 days ago +19
Except the IAEA isn’t the Soviet Union.
19
Maniactver 6 days ago +3
What happened is USA threatening to bomb the energy infrastructure of Iran.
3
Stefouch 6 days ago +2
The IAEA is no joke. They take that seriously. Don't compare them to the Soviet Union.
2
pickle16 6 days ago +1
Russia wouldn't evacuate staff then, cause they would be potential leakers if something major happened. This is purely a preventive measure since there is a non zero chance of either something happening, or Russia doesn't want to be caught too in bed with Iran.
1
UseBackground2370 6 days ago +12
Someone on Twitter from Iran got online from there. They were hit yesterday and today. Their time. No warnings. Only a few people were told not to go to work. Many still went to work. Not regime people. Ordinary people who work at these plants. The holidays are over and people are starting to go back to work, and today was the beginning of the week (in Iran, we work Sat-Wed and the weekend is Thu and Fri). Their tweet basically said "why didn't Israel send a warning to evacuate this area" and it broke my heart. 
12
gayphilantropist 6 days ago +39
But according to listnook the nuclear plant was a nothingburger and they had no hopes of achieving their goals?
39
Im_better_than__u 6 days ago +18
That bridge was a nothingburger too.
18
timoumd 6 days ago +9
I'm not sure I follow.  This is a nuclear power plant, no?
9
b00ty10v3r 6 days ago +32
Nuclear power != Nuclear weapons.
32
Slow-Conflict-3959 6 days ago +22
Bombing a nuclear power plant is probably worse tbh in terms of contamination.
22
Ossa1 6 days ago +7
This. The amount of radioactive material is orders of magnitude higher than in a nuclear explosion, at least if you dont go with "salt-the-earth"-style ground detonations.
7
gayphilantropist 6 days ago +2
They didn't bomb the plant, they bombed the entrance.
2
gayphilantropist 6 days ago +14
I agree with you wholeheartedly, but, hear me out, IF a massive portion of the Iran's nuclear science team is Russian, would it also not be feasible that their bunkers were also filled with Russian scientists?
14
Japples123 6 days ago +10
Either way if you are working there do you want to be bombed or Evacuate?
10
gayphilantropist 6 days ago -17
I would love to be evacuated, but that's not my point. My point is that nuclear threat was clearly imminent, why would you otherwise risk evacuation, by Russia. Russia is pulling their own specialists out of Bushehr.
-17
xdr567 6 days ago +1
They never denied hsving processing radioactive material. They denied having weapon's grade nuclear material, which they didnt as verified by all international observers. Remember US tore up the JCPOA but Iran kept abiding by it between them and the Europeans. This is not a nothingburger but only if you like shifting goalposts like Bibi, or his orange b****.
1
Swagastan 6 days ago +11
Except they were in violation and they did have weapons grade material (albeit on the low end), and that’s from the IAEA report. https://www.reuters.com/world/china/iaea-report-says-iran-had-secret-activities-with-undeclared-nuclear-material-2025-05-31/
11
gayphilantropist 6 days ago +7
Guess you beat me to it with a different report :) IDK why people think I'm here to lie or something.
7
SporksInjected 6 days ago +2
There is no reason to have uranium 20x more enriched than energy grade other than to make weapons.
2
xdr567 6 days ago +1
There is no reason to persist in sanctions, force a negotiation and tear up the agreement unilaterally. If anything has been proven in this conflict it is that they were fools to not create a weapon brcause they have no deterrant.
1
SporksInjected 6 days ago +1
Did they build secret underground nuclear facility because the air conditioning was cheaper?
1
gayphilantropist 6 days ago +4
I don't know why I'm getting blasted with down votes, but, here [https://apnews.com/article/iran-nuclear-iaea-uranium-enrichment-suspend-ccf574a324504b985f4b158f9d3d6941](https://apnews.com/article/iran-nuclear-iaea-uranium-enrichment-suspend-ccf574a324504b985f4b158f9d3d6941) Clearly they were actually getting somewhere, and clearly not without help.
4
Volistar 6 days ago +2
Why do you cats call them nothingburgers?
2
Elegant_Emu952 6 days ago +9
Now, Putin will send them to the Ukrainian front.
9
Ultra_Metal 6 days ago +29
This is a sign that the Islamic Republic is close to collapse. Russia always withdraws its personnel from allied countries right before the regime collapses. A similar thing happened in Syria right before Assad fled.
29
Affectionate_Bee6434 6 days ago +57
1.They don't want to be bombed and killed or 2.They don't want to be the ones managing an emergency if the plant is hit and causes some sort of a meltdown.
57
Ultra_Metal 6 days ago -30
Nobody is going to bomb the plant. Bombing it has no military value. It's just going to create a bad situation, nothing more. It does nothing to weaken the regime. Russia is withdrawing because they know the end of the regime is near and they don't want their personnel caught in a dangerous situation.
-30
clockdivide55 6 days ago +5
After all this, you think the US administration is not going to do something because doing that something would be stupid?
5
Malaguena 6 days ago +18
> It's just going to create a bad situation, nothing more. When has that ever stopped the Trump regime? They do stupid shit just for the hell of it
18
69420isntfunny 6 days ago +3
>BBC: Iran reports new attacks on Bushehr nuclear plant, sparking IAEA warning https://share.google/dVha7bmnuVJxlFlvt >The area around Iran's Bushehr nuclear power plant has been attacked for the fourth time during the current war, Iranian officials say, as the US and Israel continue to target energy and other industrial sites.
3
dirty_hooker 6 days ago +1
No one is going to bomb it. It has no military value. Pretty sure they said the same about Chernobyl. It’d be more helpful if the US military was run by a competent individual rather than, well, that guy.
1
angrymoppet 6 days ago +16
That's not what this means. Today marks the 4th time the US/Israel have bombed that site, and today someone died there. Russia is pulling its people out because of both the risk from continued missile strikes but also potential radiation if the strikes continue.
16
Ultra_Metal 6 days ago -6
The plant was never in danger nor was it the target. They were bombing nearby. The plant itself isn't in danger. The Russians are leaving because they know it's over.
-6
angrymoppet 6 days ago
The girls elementary school was never in danger nor was it the target. They were bombing nearby. The school itself isn't in danger. It's war. Mistakes happen. It's generally best to not put yourself in a position where a mistake can result in a radiation leak. It's why the IAEA - who has never carried water for the Iranians, so it's not like you can accuse them of being soft on them - has publicly condemned these strikes and warned of the potential for dire consequences if the US and Israel keep rolling the dice on these missile strikes. Russia has been slowly pulling their people out since day 1 of this war, but after someone died on site today from shrapnel, they are expediting the removal of the remainder of their personnel. Which basically any country on Earth would do in the same situation.
0
beekeeper1981 6 days ago +11
Most evacuated Ukraine shortly before the invasion. It does mean anything about imminent collapse.
11
duncanmarshall 6 days ago +5
Have you seen any information whatsoever indicating the regime is unstable?
5
Ultra_Metal 6 days ago
Plenty, such as infighting among the leadership, importing of foreign terrorists, defections from the military and IRGC, the Russians are evacuating, the recruitment of child soldiers, the currency collapse, etc etc etc.
0
SporksInjected 6 days ago
The continued whitelisting of nation vessels in Hormuz
0
Ultra_Metal 5 days ago +1
Good point, that's another sign. They are desperate for cash and are undermining their own strategy of blocking the strait. This is why the price of oil has not gone up as much as was expected.
1
yosisoy 6 days ago +7
Why the f*** are there hundreds of Russians there exactly?
7
1Beholderandrip 6 days ago +6
Russia and China ~~are~~ were strong allies of Iran.
6
taskforceslacker 6 days ago +5
So, to recap, Iran and Russia have nuclear facilities that have been damaged. I’m sure that won’t develop into a larger problem.
5
Mike-North 6 days ago +3
I hope they are checking their pockets for U-235
3
Narrow_Turnip_7129 6 days ago +2
Bombed within the week then?
2
brettmags 6 days ago +1
I wonder if they are taking anything important with them?
1
letsridetheworld 6 days ago +1
Iran has been very vocal after having russian helping with the nuke Just imagine the world without putin we wouldn’t have this mess.
1
MourningRIF 6 days ago +2
... Umm, why were they there in the first place?
2
Topsyye 6 days ago -5
Listnook see this and be like: This is actually good for Russia and the US is a vassal state to them!1
-5
niceufo777 6 days ago -22
Most likely, they are preventing the collapse of the Iranian regime. The US and Israel did the right thing by attacking the regime's leaders and its economic apparatus. 80% of Iran's metallurgy devastated. Almost 100% of medicines and pharmaceutical companies destroyed. Attacks on bunkers with tons of weapons and missiles destroyed (I know they rebuilt some, but the weapons and missiles are destroyed). A fragmented ruling body with a loss of effective power (the Israeli Revolutionary Guard is maintained by groups like Hamas and Hezbollah). Loss of trust from its neighbors. Iran, as a country, will have to work to recover.
-22
PenroseSyracuse 6 days ago
Don't forget that she is terrified about what happens to her child.
0
Odd-Professor-5309 6 days ago -13
Should have destroyed these facilities.
-13
← Back to Board