The entire nuclear plants staff appears to be Russians
1503
TachiHApr 4, 2026
+115
It is a Russian built power plant so it makes a lot of sense for some of the more specialist staff to be Russians. Its also a fairly new plant in terms of how long its been operating (yes they started building in the 70s).
115
totallyRebbApr 4, 2026
+484
Wonder how many of those "Russians" are actually important Iranian personnel they want to get out.
484
EquivalentSpot8292Apr 4, 2026
+120
Operation Iron Stapler!
120
UnspokenApr 4, 2026
+12
Probably a few but Rosatom has contracts to run these plants.
12
williamgmanApr 4, 2026
+17
Bingo.
17
QuentinTarzantinoApr 4, 2026
+100
Iranian nationals cant/ or have always had a extremely hard time working or getting work in the field when it comes to academia etc. Even if they are best inntheir field.
Russians never had that restriction against Iran. When it comes to Nuka talk.
Also thats why many go under the guise as Russian. Its been going on for ages. Headline in OP post is utter propoganda BS.
Yes, they have Russians working but the main majority are Persian. But use Russian passports when travelling. Cause, politics.
100
arup02Apr 4, 2026
+31
> Iranian nationals cant/ or have always had a extremely hard time working or getting work in the field when it comes to academia etc. Even if they are best inntheir field.
Is this true, if so, why?
31
QuentinTarzantinoApr 4, 2026
+32
I think it was because the restrictions set ages ago. But there is always a loop hole. Many worked internationally, but used none Iranian passports. It was a guided thing. Travel from home xountry, but remember to go through Germany then this country then 3rd country which was a final destination. It technically became a Ok to work. I may be paraphrasing, cause its been several years since I heard it.
But they had to be carefull. Many got caught cause they tried bringing family. Or got cauhht after the fact.
32
arup02Apr 4, 2026
+8
Interesting, thanks.
8
QuentinTarzantinoApr 4, 2026
+5
It was either the other country stops you, or your own country gets you. Hence why so many German Persians, it was way more linient. Please correct me if Im wrong.
5
ImbendoApr 4, 2026
+8
Because their country is actively trying to make a nuclear bomb against the wishes of most of the world. Companies and universities dont want to take the risk being associated with anyone that could potentially lead to embarrassment for their establishment down the line.
8
gayphilantropistApr 4, 2026
+4
Same reason why Trump going to war against "academia' regardless of silly some of it actually is, can and likely will have lasting consequences a generation from now.
4
SporksInjectedApr 5, 2026
+1
I would be too!
1
lostroadrunner22Apr 4, 2026
+203
Did we see graphite on the roof?
203
jay6432Apr 4, 2026
+71
The Russians collected it and are taking it home with them, don’t worry.
71
27YoshApr 4, 2026
+52
That's impossible, you're in shock, go to the infirmary
52
XenotoneApr 4, 2026
+36
No we didn't because it's NOT THERE
36
NailhimselfApr 4, 2026
+30
probably just burned concrete
30
hebbidApr 4, 2026
+19
You see comrade, I may not know about graphite but I know a great deal about concrete
It may be a reference to someone who dropped their mechanical pencil refill on a roof. Very frustrating situation.
12
WesternTelevision579Apr 5, 2026
+2
Very common issue. Happens to me all the time.
2
YvaelleApr 4, 2026
+15
Yes, watch it if you haven't, everyone should watch it
15
Morstraut64Apr 4, 2026
+8
Ha, thank you. I have seen it but I'm a goldfish. I should watch it again
8
[deleted]Apr 4, 2026
+314
[removed]
314
CaptainCanuck93Apr 4, 2026
+222
It seems like they are expecting the USA is going to follow Russia's example in egregiously irresponsible bombing of a nuclear plant
222
TeaAndLiftingApr 4, 2026
+54
Trump is just following in his idol's footsteps
54
felis_scipioApr 4, 2026
+10
More likely targeting the staff themselves
10
Ultra_MetalApr 4, 2026
-49
Nobody is going to bomb the plant, that makes no sense from a military point of view. Russia is withdrawing because they likely think the regime is about to collapse and don't want their personnel to be caught in a dangerous situation.
-49
ChrumanApr 4, 2026
+18
The military campaign in Iran doesn't make sense from a military point of view either lmfao
18
duncanmarshallApr 4, 2026
+16
>Nobody is going to bomb the plant, that makes no sense from a military point of view.
You just convinced me Trump/Hegseth are going to do it.
16
CaptainCanuck93Apr 4, 2026
+40
Are you under the impression that the USA is only bombing military targets?
40
Ultra_MetalApr 4, 2026
-80
I know for sure.
-80
inquisitive_guy_0_1Apr 4, 2026
+21
No, you don't. Stop lying.
21
DonnieTheYowieApr 4, 2026
+19
Was the civilian bridge under construction a military target?
19
kirkykingApr 4, 2026
+11
They’ve blown up a school, hospitals and also university. Surely you could’ve picked one of those instead of something which is pretty much a book example of a legitimate military target.
11
kurQlApr 4, 2026
+1
Yes bridges do have military usage.
1
SirDiesel1803Apr 4, 2026
+21
They knowingly bombed a school.
The school was marked as a school on Google maps.
They never denied it was a school that was bombed.
They tried to say it was Iran who bombed the school. However it was an american bomb and it was an american video of the bomb landing.
How after years and years of sanctions would they get an american bomb?
21
SporksInjectedApr 5, 2026
This is obviously very tragic but I think it’s fucked up that all the kids were buried in Iranian flag coffins in a mass grave. My kids were just murdered and I had no say in their funeral or where they’re buried just so the state can make a monument to the war. I can’t imagine if Bush required all the 9/11 victims be buried in this way.
0
Difficult_Mousse7976Apr 4, 2026
-27
Bullshit…you’re just regurgitating the terrorist regime propaganda. The school was a previous terrorist facility right next to an active military site. The regime is using Hamas strategy of operating within civilian enclaves.
None of this matters anyways when Iran doesn’t even value the lives of its citizens. The regime is currently enrolling kids into the army and they have previously used kids to sweep land mines in past wars. Plus 30,000 protesters killed early this year with daily ongoing executions.
-27
AstralsketchApr 4, 2026
+16
america literally admitted it so...
16
kurQlApr 4, 2026
When did US admitted "knowingly" attacking a school?
0
SirDiesel1803Apr 4, 2026
+19
I never said Iran was good. But they did blow up a school.
It was on fox news and everything.
On Google maps it was a school.
Its not bullshit.
Was it an accident? I f****** hope so. But jesus it was a school .
19
desba3347Apr 4, 2026
+4
It likely lies somewhere in the middle. Do I think the U.S. intentionally targeted a school? No. Do I think irresponsible negligence in intelligence caused those kids to die without the regime resorting to Hamas-like tactics in that instance? Also yes. Mistakes happen in all jobs, in war it causes innocent lives, that doesn’t mean investigation and accountability shouldn’t take place.
4
selfiecatApr 4, 2026
+1
I've heard this type of justification somewhere, I wonder where it is
1
Toxic-WidowApr 4, 2026
+14
How about the school 170+ kids that got killed by a triple tap bombing in Iran like a month ago?
14
jay6432Apr 4, 2026
-15
~110 children. That happened over a month ago, if you’re gonna use figures then make sure they’re accurate.
-15
Toxic-WidowApr 4, 2026
+9
Right...that's why when you look up school bombing Iran all sources say 150+ killed but I have the wrong numbers...
9
skippy_smoothApr 4, 2026
+6
Making sense? That stopped being a thing a while ago.
6
jqman69Apr 4, 2026
+17
No sense to bomb schools either but here we are
17
caboosetpApr 4, 2026
+5
> Nobody is going to bomb the plant
[They already bombed the plant complex.](https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/4/4/iaea-says-projectile-hits-near-irans-bushehr-nuclear-plant-killing-one) Not the reactor itself, but there was damage to buildings that house important things related to keeping the reactor online like cooling systems.
5
MuDDy_PaNDaApr 4, 2026
+6
And the USA has only done actions that make sense from a military point of view in the last year?
The problem is that you're still expecting them to do rational things.
This is not 2010 USA anymore, we can't expect them anymore to do what is rational all the time.
6
tico42Apr 4, 2026
+2
Yes, because Russia historically cares about loss of life...
2
tellsyoutogetfuckedApr 4, 2026
+1
They are evacuating because the plant already got hit.
1
vmdvrApr 4, 2026
+1
Didn't make military sense to bomb elementary schools, universities, hospitals, apartment buildings, civilian bridges in cities etc. But they all got bombed. Why not a nuclear power plant too?
1
BlipBlapBloppityBoopApr 4, 2026
I would completely expect them to reveal to the world that they’re as low as the Russians.
0
fullofspidersApr 4, 2026
+11
Probably due to the US bombings. They probably don't want to be near the nuclear power plant when it melts down. That's widely considered to be a health risk.
11
IntelArtiGenApr 4, 2026
+17
Maybe that staff was able to "see things". The US / Israel targeted places around the power plants multiple times I think, and it's possible the IRGC is using it to shield military activities. Russians did the same at ZNPP.
17
Hey-Froyo-9395Apr 4, 2026
+2
Wonder if the staff is taking as much material and equipment with them as they can carry
2
TachiHApr 4, 2026
+1
America bombed the wider area of the plant already last night. This isn't a precaution, the site is at risk of being bit.
1
IntelArtiGenApr 4, 2026
+319
Sounds like they're not optimistic about a quick end to the war.
319
MoreFeeYouSApr 4, 2026
+150
Trump's 3 week operation reminded them of the specific 3 day operation.
150
DirkDigglersPenisApr 4, 2026
+42
Problems come in 3’s
42
DaddyIngrossoApr 4, 2026
+30
Valve would know
30
DimhilionApr 4, 2026
+4
Oohh cmon, thats just downright mean, to remind me like that :p
4
wlaugh29Apr 4, 2026
+10
According to my math, if a 3 day special military operation is on going for 4 years, this debacle should be a minimum of 28 years.
10
fence_sitterApr 4, 2026
+3
That's a lot of Mooches.
3
ZuAusHierDaApr 4, 2026
+2
How goes your math?
2
Johannes_PApr 4, 2026
+4
Or that the war might end quickly yet the NPP might get further targeted.
4
PmMeCuteDogsThanks_Apr 4, 2026
+2
Well Putin is kind of an expert on short invasions
2
Ultra_MetalApr 4, 2026
-11
Or they think the war will end quickly but with the collapse of the Islamic Republic and they don't want their personnel to be caught in a dangerous situation.
-11
duncanmarshallApr 4, 2026
+15
I've seen absolutely no evidence that the regime is experiencing instability. Do you have links (from non-clownish sources) please?
15
raikou1988Apr 4, 2026
+9
They do not.
Just opinions
9
Boring-Leadership687Apr 4, 2026
+2
Absolutely no evidence of instability? Really?? Its entire leadership getting wiped out isn’t instability????
What the heck is your definition of instability?
The regime is unstable as f***. Surviving? Yes. But that does not mean it escaped instability
2
duncanmarshallApr 4, 2026
+4
No, people dying is not instability of the regime. Instability would be some reason why the IRGC is losing control of the country.
4
daniel_22sssApr 4, 2026
+1
I've seen videos, where local rebels stage attacks on iranian military vehicles. Does that count as instability?
1
duncanmarshallApr 4, 2026
+1
How did you verify the videos?
1
daniel_22sssApr 4, 2026
Ghost of Khamelei personally came to me and verified it. Dufuq do you expect me to say?
0
duncanmarshallApr 4, 2026
+2
Whatever you told yourself was the reason these videos are reliable, tell it to me.
2
Boring-Leadership687Apr 4, 2026
-5
You have a very weird definition of instability. Losing control of the country is collapse not simple instability
-5
Mighty__MonarchApr 4, 2026
+1
Do you think Trump and his circle getting hit would cause the US to collapse?
Thats just not how nations of tens of millions of people work man lmfao
1
Boring-Leadership687Apr 4, 2026
No but it would definitely cause some instability in the government
0
IBM296Apr 4, 2026
+3
If the war was going to end quickly, it would have ended by now. It's been more than a month now. Get ready for higher oil prices.
3
SupaMonroeGuyApr 4, 2026
+74
Well, now we know who was working what.
74
kivimango23Apr 4, 2026
+34
I think they are expecting ground invasion.
34
hawkseye17Apr 4, 2026
+11
at this point who isn't?
11
MopstilltheendApr 5, 2026
+2
Me to be honest. At most there‘ll be a couple of hundreds of special forces operating limited night strikes like the one we saw earlier today. Now full scale ground invasion like Afghanistan or Vietnam will happen in Iran.
2
44Stryker44Apr 4, 2026
+13
198 more? How many did they have to begin with?
13
BigDaddyDumperSquadApr 4, 2026
+124
If Russian scientists composed that much of Iran's nuclear staff, I can only assume that they're helping the development of nuclear weaponry as well...
124
ManiactverApr 4, 2026
+19
Iran and Russia have been cooperating with nuclear power plants for a long time, that's nothing new.
19
DataDude00Apr 4, 2026
+48
Russia has thousands of nukes.
If they wanted Iran to have one they could have given them a few dozen
48
alexidhdApr 4, 2026
+61
That’s not how a nuclear program works.
61
BigDaddyDumperSquadApr 4, 2026
+38
Uhhh, no that's not how it works with nukes in 2026...
38
PsycheTokerApr 4, 2026
+36
Im assuming you mean legally… because Russia totally follows the rules. If they want to transfer nukes, they can.
36
Honest_Concentrate85Apr 4, 2026
+24
Yeah but if Russia just gives nukes to Iran than what’s stopping the UK, France, or US from doing the same for Ukraine
24
strommApr 4, 2026
+25
Nukes have a finger print that can be found after detonation.
The major powers have shared their fingerprints as part of de-escalation and treaties.
So if Russia gave anyone a nuke and that party used it, the world would know it can from Russia.
If Russia helps Iran make their own, it’s hard to prove Russia was involved.
Also, YES, regular nuclear power plants can enrich material for use in nuclear weapons.
25
demonica123Apr 4, 2026
+3
No one cares where a nuke came from. That's why MAD is MAD. The world dies if an ICBM is launched or there is any other force of nuclear launch.
3
strommApr 6, 2026
+1
What does Mothers Against Drugs have to do with nukes…
1
SufficientBityApr 4, 2026
+6
Also, what's stopping Iran from using that nuke against Russia if their supreme leader wakes up on the wrong side of the bed in the morning.
6
PsycheTokerApr 4, 2026
+6
Ukraine had nukes, thats what was stopping Russia from launching a full scale invasion. They gave their nuclear weapons up to America for a protection deal, but we did not protect them.
6
ReasonablyBadassApr 5, 2026
+1
I am pretty sure you can trace nukes nowadays. Meaning if Iran used one, Russia would be on the hook.
Also, this assumes Russia wants them to have one, instead of stringing them along.
1
TachiHApr 4, 2026
+16
That plant isn't remotely able to be used towards a nuclear weapon. There is a huge difference in being a specialist in civil and military nuclear engineering.
16
BigDaddyDumperSquadApr 4, 2026
+5
That's not what was being said.
5
TachiHApr 4, 2026
+6
The staff who help run power stations can't help make nukes.
Iran wouldn't need Russian scientists to teach them how to make a bomb, they would just need the plans to make one. Russia wouldn't supply them staff as its pointless.
6
BigDaddyDumperSquadApr 4, 2026
+4
Never said anything about the same staff being used for both. But if there are hundreds of Russian nuclear scientists working at their nuclear facilities, it can be assumed they also have many working on Iran's nuclear weapons programs.
And it takes more than just a piece of paper showing how to make a nuclear warhead for the entire program to function.
4
TheEnglish1Apr 4, 2026
-2
That train of thought quite literally does not follow at all in any logical sense other than pure speculation.
-2
No_Iron_8087Apr 4, 2026
+96
So, Araghchi warns any radiation fallout will disproportionately poison the GCC nations, Russia evacuates staff. It sounds like something has happened, maybe a leak that’s become hard to contain?
The IAEA’s response of “no increase in radiation levels” is beginning to sound a little like: “3.6 Roentgen, not great, not terrible”
96
WeddingPKMApr 4, 2026
+69
IAEA is not the Soviet government, I wouldn’t expect them to act the same way if an issue has occurred.
69
Easy_Cancel5497Apr 4, 2026
+11
I expect all and any agencies to cover up shit until it spills out of the pampers
11
No_Iron_8087Apr 4, 2026
My point isn’t that they’re actively covering up, I’m saying that by announcing immediately all is well, whilst on the ground the contrary appears to be the case, is similar to the “3.6 Roentgen” repetition.
0
TachiHApr 4, 2026
+14
The Russians are leaving whilst nothing is wrong. If America bombs the plant and kills Russians then the people in Russia would demand a retaliation. Russia would absolutely recieve a warning from the US to remove its staff if there is a risk.
You will know within an hour if there is a leak as there are publicly avaliable sensors online in the region that will alert if there is a leak.
14
jay6432Apr 4, 2026
+19
Except the IAEA isn’t the Soviet Union.
19
ManiactverApr 4, 2026
+3
What happened is USA threatening to bomb the energy infrastructure of Iran.
3
StefouchApr 4, 2026
+2
The IAEA is no joke. They take that seriously. Don't compare them to the Soviet Union.
2
pickle16Apr 4, 2026
+1
Russia wouldn't evacuate staff then, cause they would be potential leakers if something major happened. This is purely a preventive measure since there is a non zero chance of either something happening, or Russia doesn't want to be caught too in bed with Iran.
1
UseBackground2370Apr 4, 2026
+12
Someone on Twitter from Iran got online from there. They were hit yesterday and today. Their time. No warnings. Only a few people were told not to go to work. Many still went to work. Not regime people. Ordinary people who work at these plants. The holidays are over and people are starting to go back to work, and today was the beginning of the week (in Iran, we work Sat-Wed and the weekend is Thu and Fri). Their tweet basically said "why didn't Israel send a warning to evacuate this area" and it broke my heart.
12
gayphilantropistApr 4, 2026
+39
But according to listnook the nuclear plant was a nothingburger and they had no hopes of achieving their goals?
39
Im_better_than__uApr 4, 2026
+18
That bridge was a nothingburger too.
18
timoumdApr 4, 2026
+9
I'm not sure I follow. This is a nuclear power plant, no?
9
b00ty10v3rApr 4, 2026
+32
Nuclear power != Nuclear weapons.
32
Slow-Conflict-3959Apr 4, 2026
+22
Bombing a nuclear power plant is probably worse tbh in terms of contamination.
22
Ossa1Apr 4, 2026
+7
This. The amount of radioactive material is orders of magnitude higher than in a nuclear explosion, at least if you dont go with "salt-the-earth"-style ground detonations.
7
gayphilantropistApr 4, 2026
+2
They didn't bomb the plant, they bombed the entrance.
2
gayphilantropistApr 4, 2026
+14
I agree with you wholeheartedly, but, hear me out, IF a massive portion of the Iran's nuclear science team is Russian, would it also not be feasible that their bunkers were also filled with Russian scientists?
14
Japples123Apr 4, 2026
+10
Either way if you are working there do you want to be bombed or Evacuate?
10
gayphilantropistApr 4, 2026
-17
I would love to be evacuated, but that's not my point. My point is that nuclear threat was clearly imminent, why would you otherwise risk evacuation, by Russia. Russia is pulling their own specialists out of Bushehr.
-17
xdr567Apr 4, 2026
+1
They never denied hsving processing radioactive material. They denied having weapon's grade nuclear material, which they didnt as verified by all international observers. Remember US tore up the JCPOA but Iran kept abiding by it between them and the Europeans. This is not a nothingburger but only if you like shifting goalposts like Bibi, or his orange b****.
1
SwagastanApr 4, 2026
+11
Except they were in violation and they did have weapons grade material (albeit on the low end), and that’s from the IAEA report.
https://www.reuters.com/world/china/iaea-report-says-iran-had-secret-activities-with-undeclared-nuclear-material-2025-05-31/
11
gayphilantropistApr 4, 2026
+7
Guess you beat me to it with a different report :) IDK why people think I'm here to lie or something.
7
SporksInjectedApr 5, 2026
+2
There is no reason to have uranium 20x more enriched than energy grade other than to make weapons.
2
xdr567Apr 5, 2026
+1
There is no reason to persist in sanctions, force a negotiation and tear up the agreement unilaterally. If anything has been proven in this conflict it is that they were fools to not create a weapon brcause they have no deterrant.
1
SporksInjectedApr 5, 2026
+1
Did they build secret underground nuclear facility because the air conditioning was cheaper?
1
gayphilantropistApr 4, 2026
+4
I don't know why I'm getting blasted with down votes, but, here [https://apnews.com/article/iran-nuclear-iaea-uranium-enrichment-suspend-ccf574a324504b985f4b158f9d3d6941](https://apnews.com/article/iran-nuclear-iaea-uranium-enrichment-suspend-ccf574a324504b985f4b158f9d3d6941)
Clearly they were actually getting somewhere, and clearly not without help.
4
VolistarApr 4, 2026
+2
Why do you cats call them nothingburgers?
2
Elegant_Emu952Apr 4, 2026
+9
Now, Putin will send them to the Ukrainian front.
9
Ultra_MetalApr 4, 2026
+29
This is a sign that the Islamic Republic is close to collapse. Russia always withdraws its personnel from allied countries right before the regime collapses. A similar thing happened in Syria right before Assad fled.
29
Affectionate_Bee6434Apr 4, 2026
+57
1.They don't want to be bombed and killed
or
2.They don't want to be the ones managing an emergency if the plant is hit and causes some sort of a meltdown.
57
Ultra_MetalApr 4, 2026
-30
Nobody is going to bomb the plant. Bombing it has no military value. It's just going to create a bad situation, nothing more. It does nothing to weaken the regime. Russia is withdrawing because they know the end of the regime is near and they don't want their personnel caught in a dangerous situation.
-30
clockdivide55Apr 4, 2026
+5
After all this, you think the US administration is not going to do something because doing that something would be stupid?
5
MalaguenaApr 4, 2026
+18
> It's just going to create a bad situation, nothing more.
When has that ever stopped the Trump regime? They do stupid shit just for the hell of it
18
69420isntfunnyApr 4, 2026
+3
>BBC: Iran reports new attacks on Bushehr nuclear plant, sparking IAEA warning
https://share.google/dVha7bmnuVJxlFlvt
>The area around Iran's Bushehr nuclear power plant has been attacked for the fourth time during the current war, Iranian officials say, as the US and Israel continue to target energy and other industrial sites.
3
dirty_hookerApr 4, 2026
+1
No one is going to bomb it. It has no military value.
Pretty sure they said the same about Chernobyl.
It’d be more helpful if the US military was run by a competent individual rather than, well, that guy.
1
angrymoppetApr 4, 2026
+16
That's not what this means. Today marks the 4th time the US/Israel have bombed that site, and today someone died there. Russia is pulling its people out because of both the risk from continued missile strikes but also potential radiation if the strikes continue.
16
Ultra_MetalApr 5, 2026
-6
The plant was never in danger nor was it the target. They were bombing nearby. The plant itself isn't in danger. The Russians are leaving because they know it's over.
-6
angrymoppetApr 5, 2026
The girls elementary school was never in danger nor was it the target. They were bombing nearby. The school itself isn't in danger.
It's war. Mistakes happen. It's generally best to not put yourself in a position where a mistake can result in a radiation leak. It's why the IAEA - who has never carried water for the Iranians, so it's not like you can accuse them of being soft on them - has publicly condemned these strikes and warned of the potential for dire consequences if the US and Israel keep rolling the dice on these missile strikes.
Russia has been slowly pulling their people out since day 1 of this war, but after someone died on site today from shrapnel, they are expediting the removal of the remainder of their personnel. Which basically any country on Earth would do in the same situation.
0
beekeeper1981Apr 4, 2026
+11
Most evacuated Ukraine shortly before the invasion. It does mean anything about imminent collapse.
11
duncanmarshallApr 4, 2026
+5
Have you seen any information whatsoever indicating the regime is unstable?
5
Ultra_MetalApr 5, 2026
Plenty, such as infighting among the leadership, importing of foreign terrorists, defections from the military and IRGC, the Russians are evacuating, the recruitment of child soldiers, the currency collapse, etc etc etc.
0
SporksInjectedApr 5, 2026
The continued whitelisting of nation vessels in Hormuz
0
Ultra_MetalApr 5, 2026
+1
Good point, that's another sign. They are desperate for cash and are undermining their own strategy of blocking the strait. This is why the price of oil has not gone up as much as was expected.
1
yosisoyApr 4, 2026
+7
Why the f*** are there hundreds of Russians there exactly?
7
1BeholderandripApr 4, 2026
+6
Russia and China ~~are~~ were strong allies of Iran.
6
taskforceslackerApr 4, 2026
+5
So, to recap, Iran and Russia have nuclear facilities that have been damaged. I’m sure that won’t develop into a larger problem.
5
Mike-NorthApr 4, 2026
+3
I hope they are checking their pockets for U-235
3
Narrow_Turnip_7129Apr 4, 2026
+2
Bombed within the week then?
2
brettmagsApr 5, 2026
+1
I wonder if they are taking anything important with them?
1
letsridetheworldApr 5, 2026
+1
Iran has been very vocal after having russian helping with the nuke
Just imagine the world without putin we wouldn’t have this mess.
1
MourningRIFApr 4, 2026
+2
... Umm, why were they there in the first place?
2
TopsyyeApr 4, 2026
-5
Listnook see this and be like: This is actually good for Russia and the US is a vassal state to them!1
-5
niceufo777Apr 4, 2026
-22
Most likely, they are preventing the collapse of the Iranian regime. The US and Israel did the right thing by attacking the regime's leaders and its economic apparatus. 80% of Iran's metallurgy devastated. Almost 100% of medicines and pharmaceutical companies destroyed. Attacks on bunkers with tons of weapons and missiles destroyed (I know they rebuilt some, but the weapons and missiles are destroyed). A fragmented ruling body with a loss of effective power (the Israeli Revolutionary Guard is maintained by groups like Hamas and Hezbollah). Loss of trust from its neighbors. Iran, as a country, will have to work to recover.
-22
PenroseSyracuseApr 5, 2026
Don't forget that she is terrified about what happens to her child.
164 Comments