Russia Hits Major Water Supply Dam Near Kharkiv With Six Guided Bombs

That move literally forced water rations in Crimea for citizens at first and made them not like Ukraine even more. But you probably know more than people that lived there. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363326160_Analysis_and_Assessment_of_Desertification_Processes_in_the_Crimea

>sounds like NATO established the precedent here. 1) Lmao. 2) Thank you for sending me a document you didn't read yourself >54. During the bombing campaign, NATO aircraft flew 38,400 sorties, including 10,484 strike sorties. During these sorties, 23, 614 air munitions were released (figures from NATO). As indicated in the preceding paragraph, it appears that approximately 500 civilians were killed during the campaign. These figures do not indicate that NATO may have conducted a campaign aimed at causing substantial civilian casualties either directly or incidentally. >57. In the course of its review, the committee did not come across any incident which, in its opinion, required investigation by the OTP. >59. It does not appear that the train was targeted deliberately. >62. It is the opinion of the committee that the bridge was a legitimate military objective. The passenger train was not deliberately targeted. The person controlling the bombs, pilot or WSO, targeted the bridge and, over a very short period of time, failed to recognize the arrival of the train while the first bomb was in flight. On the Djakovica Convoy >69. It is the opinion of the committee that civilians were not deliberately attacked in this incident. On the Bombing of the RTS (Serbian TV and Radio Station) in Belgrade >77. Assuming the station was a legitimate objective, the civilian casualties were unfortunately high but do not appear to be clearly disproportionate. >Not only were these targets central to the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia’s governing apparatus, but formed, from a military point of view, an integral part of the strategic communications network which enabled both the military and national command authorities to direct the repression and atrocities taking place in Kosovo (ibid, 21 April 1999). >79. On the basis of the above analysis and on the information currently available to it, the committee recommends that the OTP not commence an investigation related to the bombing of the Serbian TV and Radio Station. On the Bombing of the Chinese embassy >85. It is the opinion of the committee that the aircrew involved in the attack should not be assigned any responsibility for the fact they were given the wrong target and that it is inappropriate to attempt to assign criminal responsibility for the incident to senior leaders because they were provided with wrong information by officials of another agency. Based on the information available to it, the committee is of the opinion that the OTP should not undertake an investigation concerning the bombing of the Chinese Embassy. This is the most damning for NATO, and the committee approved of NATO's response (the committee accepted that bad intelligence led to targeting a civilian structure without sufficient legitimate military objectives, removing those intel officers, publicly apologizing, paying the Chinese government for the incident). Criminality occurred here, but NATO properly punished the people involved in said criminality, hence no further investigation. On the attack on Koriša Village >There is some information indicating that displaced Kosovar civilians were forcibly concentrated within a military camp in the village of Koriša as human shields and that Yugoslav military forces may thus be at least partially responsible for the deaths there. >The committee is of the view that the credible information available is not sufficient to tend to show that a crime within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal has been committed by the aircrew or by superiors in the NATO chain of command. Based on the information available to it, the committee is of the opinion that OTP should not undertake an investigation concerning the bombing at Koriša. Idk how you can be so confidently wrong lol. All of these instances were assessed based on proportionality. There is absolutely no way any international law body would find the Kakhovka Dam strike or Russia's years long bombardement on heating infrastructure to be proportional under international law