· 69 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 15, 2026 at 7:28 PM

Russia Publishes Addresses of European Drone Facilities Labelling Them Potential Targets

Posted by UNITED24Media


Russia Publishes Addresses of European Drone Facilities Labelling Them Potential Targets
UNITED24 Media
Russia Publishes Addresses of European Drone Facilities Labelling Them Potential Targets
Russia's Ministry of Defense has identified 21 European companies producing strike drones for Ukraine, labeling them potential targets.

🚩 Report this post

69 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
aluke000 Apr 15, 2026 +119
Post the addresses of all of Putin’s homes, yachts, and assets.
119
MinorKeyEnjoyer Apr 15, 2026 +179
>Medvedev added that the timing of any future strikes would depend on upcoming developments, telling European partners to "sleep soundly." B movie villain type shit
179
Heavy_Secret_203 Apr 15, 2026 +88
They won't dare to attack, but some useful idiots can do the trick with arson like it was in Checzh Republic a few weeks ago. 
88
PerLin107 Apr 16, 2026 +13
Yes this is Ruzzian playbook 101. Or peace 'protesters' outside of facilities etc
13
kaamliiha Apr 17, 2026 +2
Damaging undersea infrastructure is already an act of war. Article 5, like 3 years ago already Also nice pussies UK for not grabbing the tanker going through the channel
2
Good-Imagination3967 Apr 15, 2026 -52
Wasn't the checking republic atac actually against israely elbit weapons manufacturer?
-52
Seeker-N7 Apr 16, 2026 +6
Holy Stroke
6
Good-Imagination3967 Apr 16, 2026 -2
Pro-Palestinian activists in South England /Bristol it would seem, not Czech Republic.
-2
NapoleonBlownapart9 Apr 15, 2026 +15
That’s his job now, alcoholic, social media attack-dog. It seems like a lifetime ago he was the puppet-President who made reasonable-ish (by Russian standards) comments. This gig is probably his “punishment” for going off script once or twice back then. Or pissing off oligarchs. It’s all kabuki theatre anyway.
15
imaginary_num6er Apr 15, 2026 +7
It’s not Putin so it’s safe to ignore
7
i_am_a_lurker69 Apr 15, 2026 +328
This is how you know they are panicking.
328
AcidShAwk Apr 15, 2026 -206
Why wouldn't weapons manufacs be targets? They're targets in war everywhere.
-206
smltor Apr 15, 2026 +89
Attacking weapons manufacturers (or anything else really) in a country you are not actively at war with seems a fairly likely way to become at war with that country. Manufacturers in Ukraine? Already at war with them. In Denmark? Different story I'd suspect.
89
Probably-MK Apr 15, 2026 +153
Historically bombing the technically still neutral nations providing weapons to your enemies doesn’t end well
153
lucitribal Apr 15, 2026 +53
Because Article 5 is still a thing
53
Broken_Reality Apr 15, 2026 +38
The only reason Russia would risk this is because of Trump's stance on NATO. Attacking European countries would trigger Article 5 and Trump would likely ignore it right now.
38
chargernj Apr 15, 2026 +61
NATO, even without the USA, still dog walks Russia if there was a war between them.
61
Broken_Reality Apr 15, 2026 +9
Oh yeah I am sure they would given the showing Russia has made in Ukraine. But I think they gained a little confidence with Trump dissing NATO so much lately.
9
AcidShAwk Apr 15, 2026 -70
That's not what I asked.
-70
Broken_Reality Apr 15, 2026 +29
So is Europe and Russia at war then? We sure wold be if Russia started bombing random drone manufacturers all over Europe.
29
AcidShAwk Apr 15, 2026 -57
If Europe is supplying weapons to be used against Russia, they are in fact at war. Whether its official with a declaration is irrelevant
-57
[deleted] Apr 16, 2026 +29
[deleted]
29
Broken_Reality Apr 16, 2026 +2
By his definition Ukraine, America, UK, The EU, and Canada are at war with Russia, China, North Korea and a few other countries. This would make it WW3 and bigger than WW2.... His definition is total nonsense.
2
AcidShAwk Apr 16, 2026 -19
What an idiotic take. There is only one definition of war. It's in the dictionary. Look it up.
-19
Broken_Reality Apr 16, 2026 +3
War -*noun* 1. a state of armed conflict between different countries or different groups within a country. There you go that's the dictionary definition. Russia and the EU are not at war by the dictionary definition. Hope that clears things up for you.
3
Consistent_Horse6529 Apr 16, 2026 +18
There is about a century and a half of international law and precedent saying attacking a third non-combatant nation is illegal, a crime against peace, and a war crime. Even if they are selling weapons to your enemy.
18
AcidShAwk Apr 16, 2026 -10
Rules for war just turn war into a game. A real war has no rules. None. If you agree to rules, you're just playing a game. The only losers are the idiots that literally pick one side over the other. When the true enemy are the ones actually at the top on both sides of the f****** game.
-10
Dodislav Apr 16, 2026 +16
I'm sure this sounder super cool and smart in your head. But it's complete nonsense. Rules turn it into a game but in reality enemies are the leaders of both sides of the game... that is not a game! It's war, not a game! Except for the leaders, it's game for them I guess?
16
squangus007 Apr 18, 2026 +1
Bro is a moron that fully admitted that he would shoot his countrymen and defect to the opposing force because “the enemy is the one that gives me the gun”.
1
Broken_Reality Apr 16, 2026 +1
"A real war has no rules" Oh come on now. War has had rules for decades because when it doesn't then some really really bad things happen. A lot of innocent people die. Are you Pete Hegseth by any chance? Or do you just parrot things he says?
1
[deleted] Apr 16, 2026
[removed]
0
Several_Magician1541 Apr 17, 2026 +1
Cool it with the anime monologue lil bro, take the L on this one.
1
AcidShAwk Apr 17, 2026 +1
I ain't the one that deleted my comments
1
McGuirk808 Apr 16, 2026 +4
Let's hypothetically say you're correct—there is a huge difference between indirect tangential involvement and direct combat involvement. Russia don't want that smoke.
4
Broken_Reality Apr 16, 2026 +1
No they are not at war. When America was selling weapons to the UK in WW2 were they then at war with Germany? No they weren't Neither country had declared war on the other at that point and didn't for years. Is China at war with Israel and the USA right now for supplying weapons to Iran? No they aren't. Stop talking nonsense.
1
KAI5ER Apr 15, 2026 +2
20%–40% of Ukraine’s weapons are from the U.S.
2
InvestigatorLow3076 Apr 15, 2026 +2
What war? Just a special military operation, right?
2
Xspud_316 Apr 15, 2026 +51
Yeah cause that’s exactly what Russia needs right now after 4 and half years of brutal war in Ukraine, to bring the whole of Europe in against them 😂 F*** up Vlad.
51
[deleted] Apr 15, 2026 +24
[deleted]
24
kaamliiha Apr 17, 2026 +1
Threat of nukes is irrelevant, there is no such thing as I have nukes and can do anything.
1
Zlimness Apr 15, 2026 +76
Russia: Europe is hysterical. We would never attack them. Also Russia:
76
Juanbolastristes Apr 15, 2026 +25
Don't hit the AI data centers please Mr Putin! Do not do it!! that would cripple us a lot!
25
Shinigami19961996 Apr 16, 2026 +4
Please no, I can't live without my AI slop
4
[deleted] Apr 15, 2026 +20
Its not like they were secret in the first place.
20
KriosXVII Apr 15, 2026 +12
The Russian MOD resorting to stochastic terrorism. Weak.
12
Expert_Radish_4699 Apr 15, 2026 +37
Publishing exact locations of facilities and calling them “targets” isn’t just rhetoric, that’s escalation, even if no strike happens.
37
kaamliiha Apr 17, 2026 +1
It's an act of war. Article.....
1
OldRepresentative578 Apr 15, 2026 +10
Representative of a terrorist state makes more terrorist threats.
10
Golrith Apr 15, 2026 +19
Brit here, still waiting for the nuclear tidal wave that will magically only affect England.
19
dimwalker Apr 16, 2026 +2
It's a tidal wave with laser pointer. Means it's super precise.
2
Lost-Transitions Apr 15, 2026 +12
So they're scared and lashing out in the hopes that it'll scare you too without actually doing anything cuz' then they'd be cooked.
12
ymOx Apr 16, 2026 +3
We all know this. More posturing for his own nationals I guess.
3
copperblood Apr 15, 2026 +9
Awww is Putin mad he got kicked out of Budapest??
9
Kan4lZ0n3 Apr 15, 2026 +9
If Russia wants a lesson in war, they’ll certainly get one if they follow through with this stupidity. Putin and his imbecilic Kremlin bros should worry about losing the war thy already have less badly before biting off on another one they’ll lose all the way.
9
LineElegant3832 Apr 16, 2026 +4
Crowdsourcing their covert-ops? Innovative
4
BrexitHangover Apr 15, 2026 +19
One little rock on NATO territory and Ruzzia will f****** end.
19
Lill-Q Apr 15, 2026 +8
Not true, they already threw a bunch of ”rocks” (drones) on NATO territory and nothing much materialised in the form of counters.
8
chargernj Apr 15, 2026 +7
For the drones, Russia can claim plausible deniability.
7
BrexitHangover Apr 16, 2026 +1
There is a difference between flying drones over sensitive areas and crashing them into buildings. Especially when this would trigger a full out war. So they threw rocks but intentionally didn't hit us. Because they know quite well what would happen.
1
Lill-Q Apr 16, 2026 +3
Ah ok, you meant ”rocks that hit something valuable on NATO territory” - gotcha! In that case, yes they would f****** end!
3
StreetGe1ngsta Apr 15, 2026 +10
Add-on completed *Nuclear launch detected*
10
dragon1500z Apr 15, 2026 -23
europe doesnt have the balls to do that they will surrender first
-23
WorgenDeath Apr 16, 2026 +3
Try it Putin, see how it works out for you when Europe spreads your f****** cheeks in retaliation.
3
Future_Mousse_355 Apr 15, 2026 +5
Shit! I should empty my garage.
5
ComfortQuiet7081 Apr 15, 2026 +9
F*** arround find out
9
mats_o42 Apr 16, 2026 +2
So if you cant handle 40M Ukrainians - Lets declare war on about a 1B Nato Citizens. What could wrong with that? Russia desperately needs its ports in the Black and Baltic seas. Turkey can close the Black sea very easy. Sweden, Denmark and Norway can close Öresund just as easy. That means that Russia will have one major port left, Vladivostok. All supplies would now be deadly dependent on two tracks of railroad. It would be aa real tragedy is something would happened to one of the railroad bridges ...........
2
dimwalker Apr 16, 2026 +1
And? Address of kremlin, putin's and medvedev's sheds are also well known. Does it mean those will get droned to the ground? No.
1
konnichi1wa Apr 16, 2026 +2
It would be really funny though if they were
2
No-Name6082 Apr 16, 2026 +1
They sound worried again, good
1
← Back to Board