Post the addresses of all of Putin’s homes, yachts, and assets.
119
MinorKeyEnjoyer3 days ago
+179
>Medvedev added that the timing of any future strikes would depend on upcoming developments, telling European partners to "sleep soundly."
B movie villain type shit
179
Heavy_Secret_2033 days ago
+88
They won't dare to attack, but some useful idiots can do the trick with arson like it was in Checzh Republic a few weeks ago.
88
PerLin1073 days ago
+13
Yes this is Ruzzian playbook 101. Or peace 'protesters' outside of facilities etc
13
kaamliiha2 days ago
+2
Damaging undersea infrastructure is already an act of war. Article 5, like 3 years ago already
Also nice pussies UK for not grabbing the tanker going through the channel
2
Good-Imagination39673 days ago
-52
Wasn't the checking republic atac actually against israely elbit weapons manufacturer?
-52
Seeker-N73 days ago
+6
Holy Stroke
6
Good-Imagination39673 days ago
-2
Pro-Palestinian activists in South England /Bristol it would seem, not Czech Republic.
-2
NapoleonBlownapart93 days ago
+15
That’s his job now, alcoholic, social media attack-dog. It seems like a lifetime ago he was the puppet-President who made reasonable-ish (by Russian standards) comments. This gig is probably his “punishment” for going off script once or twice back then. Or pissing off oligarchs. It’s all kabuki theatre anyway.
15
imaginary_num6er3 days ago
+7
It’s not Putin so it’s safe to ignore
7
i_am_a_lurker693 days ago
+328
This is how you know they are panicking.
328
AcidShAwk3 days ago
-206
Why wouldn't weapons manufacs be targets? They're targets in war everywhere.
-206
smltor3 days ago
+89
Attacking weapons manufacturers (or anything else really) in a country you are not actively at war with seems a fairly likely way to become at war with that country.
Manufacturers in Ukraine? Already at war with them.
In Denmark? Different story I'd suspect.
89
Probably-MK3 days ago
+153
Historically bombing the technically still neutral nations providing weapons to your enemies doesn’t end well
153
lucitribal3 days ago
+53
Because Article 5 is still a thing
53
Broken_Reality3 days ago
+38
The only reason Russia would risk this is because of Trump's stance on NATO. Attacking European countries would trigger Article 5 and Trump would likely ignore it right now.
38
chargernj3 days ago
+61
NATO, even without the USA, still dog walks Russia if there was a war between them.
61
Broken_Reality3 days ago
+9
Oh yeah I am sure they would given the showing Russia has made in Ukraine. But I think they gained a little confidence with Trump dissing NATO so much lately.
9
AcidShAwk3 days ago
-70
That's not what I asked.
-70
Broken_Reality3 days ago
+29
So is Europe and Russia at war then? We sure wold be if Russia started bombing random drone manufacturers all over Europe.
29
AcidShAwk3 days ago
-57
If Europe is supplying weapons to be used against Russia, they are in fact at war. Whether its official with a declaration is irrelevant
-57
[deleted]3 days ago
+29
[deleted]
29
Broken_Reality3 days ago
+2
By his definition Ukraine, America, UK, The EU, and Canada are at war with Russia, China, North Korea and a few other countries. This would make it WW3 and bigger than WW2....
His definition is total nonsense.
2
AcidShAwk3 days ago
-19
What an idiotic take. There is only one definition of war. It's in the dictionary. Look it up.
-19
Broken_Reality3 days ago
+3
War -*noun*
1. a state of armed conflict between different countries or different groups within a country.
There you go that's the dictionary definition.
Russia and the EU are not at war by the dictionary definition. Hope that clears things up for you.
3
Consistent_Horse65293 days ago
+18
There is about a century and a half of international law and precedent saying attacking a third non-combatant nation is illegal, a crime against peace, and a war crime. Even if they are selling weapons to your enemy.
18
AcidShAwk3 days ago
-10
Rules for war just turn war into a game. A real war has no rules. None. If you agree to rules, you're just playing a game. The only losers are the idiots that literally pick one side over the other. When the true enemy are the ones actually at the top on both sides of the f****** game.
-10
Dodislav3 days ago
+16
I'm sure this sounder super cool and smart in your head. But it's complete nonsense. Rules turn it into a game but in reality enemies are the leaders of both sides of the game... that is not a game! It's war, not a game! Except for the leaders, it's game for them I guess?
16
squangus00723 hr ago
+1
Bro is a moron that fully admitted that he would shoot his countrymen and defect to the opposing force because “the enemy is the one that gives me the gun”.
1
Broken_Reality3 days ago
+1
"A real war has no rules" Oh come on now. War has had rules for decades because when it doesn't then some really really bad things happen. A lot of innocent people die.
Are you Pete Hegseth by any chance? Or do you just parrot things he says?
1
[deleted]3 days ago
[removed]
0
Several_Magician15412 days ago
+1
Cool it with the anime monologue lil bro, take the L on this one.
1
AcidShAwk2 days ago
+1
I ain't the one that deleted my comments
1
McGuirk8083 days ago
+4
Let's hypothetically say you're correct—there is a huge difference between indirect tangential involvement and direct combat involvement. Russia don't want that smoke.
4
Broken_Reality3 days ago
+1
No they are not at war. When America was selling weapons to the UK in WW2 were they then at war with Germany? No they weren't Neither country had declared war on the other at that point and didn't for years.
Is China at war with Israel and the USA right now for supplying weapons to Iran? No they aren't.
Stop talking nonsense.
1
KAI5ER3 days ago
+2
20%–40% of Ukraine’s weapons are from the U.S.
2
InvestigatorLow30763 days ago
+2
What war? Just a special military operation, right?
2
Xspud_3163 days ago
+51
Yeah cause that’s exactly what Russia needs right now after 4 and half years of brutal war in Ukraine, to bring the whole of Europe in against them 😂
F*** up Vlad.
51
[deleted]3 days ago
+24
[deleted]
24
kaamliiha2 days ago
+1
Threat of nukes is irrelevant, there is no such thing as I have nukes and can do anything.
1
Zlimness3 days ago
+76
Russia: Europe is hysterical. We would never attack them.
Also Russia:
76
Juanbolastristes3 days ago
+25
Don't hit the AI data centers please Mr Putin! Do not do it!! that would cripple us a lot!
25
Shinigami199619963 days ago
+4
Please no, I can't live without my AI slop
4
[deleted]3 days ago
+20
Its not like they were secret in the first place.
20
KriosXVII3 days ago
+12
The Russian MOD resorting to stochastic terrorism. Weak.
12
Expert_Radish_46993 days ago
+37
Publishing exact locations of facilities and calling them “targets” isn’t just rhetoric, that’s escalation, even if no strike happens.
37
kaamliiha2 days ago
+1
It's an act of war. Article.....
1
OldRepresentative5783 days ago
+10
Representative of a terrorist state makes more terrorist threats.
10
Golrith3 days ago
+19
Brit here, still waiting for the nuclear tidal wave that will magically only affect England.
19
dimwalker3 days ago
+2
It's a tidal wave with laser pointer. Means it's super precise.
2
Lost-Transitions3 days ago
+12
So they're scared and lashing out in the hopes that it'll scare you too without actually doing anything cuz' then they'd be cooked.
12
ymOx3 days ago
+3
We all know this. More posturing for his own nationals I guess.
3
copperblood3 days ago
+9
Awww is Putin mad he got kicked out of Budapest??
9
Kan4lZ0n33 days ago
+9
If Russia wants a lesson in war, they’ll certainly get one if they follow through with this stupidity.
Putin and his imbecilic Kremlin bros should worry about losing the war thy already have less badly before biting off on another one they’ll lose all the way.
9
LineElegant38323 days ago
+4
Crowdsourcing their covert-ops? Innovative
4
BrexitHangover3 days ago
+19
One little rock on NATO territory and Ruzzia will f****** end.
19
Lill-Q3 days ago
+8
Not true, they already threw a bunch of ”rocks” (drones) on NATO territory and nothing much materialised in the form of counters.
8
chargernj3 days ago
+7
For the drones, Russia can claim plausible deniability.
7
BrexitHangover3 days ago
+1
There is a difference between flying drones over sensitive areas and crashing them into buildings. Especially when this would trigger a full out war. So they threw rocks but intentionally didn't hit us. Because they know quite well what would happen.
1
Lill-Q3 days ago
+3
Ah ok, you meant ”rocks that hit something valuable on NATO territory” - gotcha! In that case, yes they would f****** end!
3
StreetGe1ngsta3 days ago
+10
Add-on completed
*Nuclear launch detected*
10
dragon1500z3 days ago
-23
europe doesnt have the balls to do that they will surrender first
-23
WorgenDeath3 days ago
+3
Try it Putin, see how it works out for you when Europe spreads your f****** cheeks in retaliation.
3
Future_Mousse_3553 days ago
+5
Shit! I should empty my garage.
5
ComfortQuiet70813 days ago
+9
F*** arround find out
9
mats_o423 days ago
+2
So if you cant handle 40M Ukrainians - Lets declare war on about a 1B Nato Citizens. What could wrong with that?
Russia desperately needs its ports in the Black and Baltic seas. Turkey can close the Black sea very easy.
Sweden, Denmark and Norway can close Öresund just as easy.
That means that Russia will have one major port left, Vladivostok. All supplies would now be deadly dependent on two tracks of railroad. It would be aa real tragedy is something would happened to one of the railroad bridges ...........
2
dimwalker3 days ago
+1
And? Address of kremlin, putin's and medvedev's sheds are also well known. Does it mean those will get droned to the ground? No.
69 Comments