We've been here before, the more scared of something Russia is, the more they shout, but they never bite. See also the F-16 being supplied, that also had them shouting.
It's the same pattern, they see something they don't like, they threaten escalation, it means you should keep going since it's working.
225
DigitaIBlack2 days ago
+30
They do it because it works. It sows FUD about providing aid to Ukraine.
I remember going to a Roger Waters concert and dude had a bit about the US poking the Russian bear.
Because some people hate the US so much they'll latch onto just about anything to criticize them. The anti-war crowd has something to point at too. It also plays well domestically.
30
DexJedi2 days ago
+73
It is working less and less. Every time he makes these threats without following up makes them less believable.
It is not just the F16:
- 2022: no more western arms to Ukraine
- 2022: no MiG fighter jets to Ukraine
- 2022: no long range missiles
- 2022: no German supply of weapons
- 2022: no threat to Russian territory
- 2023: no supply of Patriots
- 2023: no modern western tanks
- 2023: no Storm Shadow strikes in Russia
- 2023: no atacms on Russian troops
- 2024: no long range strikes in Russia or else Nuclear war
All these lines have been crossed without the promised consequences.
73
daniel_22sss1 day ago
+1
And yet, thanks to these threats they've managed to scare Biden admin into restricting a lot of things for Ukraine long enough for Trump to come back and straight up gut US aid to Ukraine.
1
DexJedi1 day ago
+1
I did not say they did not work initially. They just lost credibility over time.
1
Master_Positive_27722 days ago
-59
And now the most likely cause of nukes actually being used, risking nuclear armageddon, comes from Cpt Orange Shitbird
-59
someocculthand2 days ago
+16
Uh, no it doesn't. Putin controls Trump.
16
Need_answers112 days ago
+18
So you live on your knees in front of putin.. got it..
18
Master_Positive_27722 days ago
-9
Huh?!
Are you idiots incapable of comprehension?
Did I say I was scared? Did I say it should prevent anyone doing anything?
I was talking about the fat c*** literally threatening to nuke Iran and that so far Putin hasn't done a damn thing. F****** morons.
I cannot fathom how Americans are so f****** thick.
-9
South-Researcher-3222 days ago
+1
Is there anything more "thick" than generalizing Americans like we're all the same? Are you all identical in the UK? Gtfo
1
jesonnier12 days ago
+1
What a dumbass.
1
Cephei1012 days ago
+1
Sure thing, new account hidden comment guy.
You make compelling points and appear so credible.
🤡🚗
1
UrineArtist2 days ago
-9
> Because some people hate the US so much they'll latch onto just about anything to criticize them. The anti-war crowd has something to point at too. It also plays well domestically.
Yeah see this time and time again, I'm a long time member of the "anti-war" crowd, I've always been and still am a harsh critic of NATO, it's behaviour has been appalling at times but I don't understand how for some people that manages to change the fact Russia's behaviour is absolutely f****** atrocious.
-9
Particular-Poem-70852 days ago
+12
Wdym anti war? You believe Ukraine should have surrendered?
12
tehwagn3r2 days ago
+11
I'm not the person you asked but as I see it, to truly be anti-war by definition requires one to be first and foremost anti-Russia. And that's what NATO is.
That's not what people usually mean when they say they're anti-war, which is both disappointing and baffling.
11
PM__ME__YOUR__PC2 days ago
+4
See also: the [paradox of tolerance](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance)
4
UrineArtist2 days ago
+2
Eh? Anti war doesn't mean anti defending yourself against aggressive neighbours who start wars. Its all on Russia, they should surrender, pay reperations to Ukraine and f*** off back to Russia.
2
Particular-Poem-70851 day ago
+1
hot take
1
UrineArtist1 day ago
+1
You asked the question.
1
motorambler2 days ago
+3
Wow, you couldn't be more wrong about a particular topic. Russia does this for one reason and one reason only: **to divert funds**. They do it a lot. Why do they do it? Because it works every damn time.
3
WigSplitter1172 days ago
+159
But it's fine for them to strike Ukraine from Belarus absolute cunts.
159
RecursiveCook2 days ago
+34
Belarus? You mean Little Ruzzia?
34
RupertPupkin852 days ago
+1
White Russia
1
tecdaz2 days ago
+87
Fake. No UA drones were routed over Baltic or Finnish airspace. The fault is Russian EW interference
87
einimea2 days ago
+7
Why would we have loudly informed everyone that the drones that were supposedly sent from Finland (like Shoigu here seems to claim) have crashed here and there in Finland and not just stayed quiet if it was some top secret operation? Why wouldn´t we have at least lied that they´re Russian drones and not Ukrainian? Why would our hornets have flown after them like lunatics? Why there´s a discussion that our defence against drones needs to be a lot better? Why the hell would we be the most honest attackers there´s ever been?
7
TheGinger_Ninja01 day ago
+3
If they attack (now NATO) Finland at the same time as Ukraine, they're in for a world of hurt.
Might as well attack Afghanistan while you're at it
3
anders_hansson2 days ago
-51
It's not fake. It's an "if". So far it hasn't happened, as far as we know, but **if** it happens Russia reserves the right to act. It's not very strange, and not too much to get worked up about.
-51
phantom-firion2 days ago
+14
Ruzzian already launches attacks via Belarus, after this war ends with Russia’s collapse Ukraine reserves the right to act against Belarus and extract concessions
14
anders_hansson2 days ago
-12
So? I'm not even talking about that. I'm just pointing out that there's nothing fake in the Russian statements, people just like to misinterpret it. E.g. they are not claiming that Ukraine is launching attacks from Finland, they are just saying the **if** that happens they will act - it's a warning.
-12
UpstairsRain60222 days ago
+4
"Shoigu alleged, without providing evidence, that Ukrainian drone attacks on Russia had increasingly been launched through Baltic states via Finland."
Shoigu is claiming that those attacks are already being conducted through these countries if you open the article.
4
anders_hansson1 day ago
-2
Can you point to a quote where he says that Ukraine is launching drones **from** Finland and the Baltic states? Your reference is an interpretation.
The quoted statement was:
>"This could occur in two scenarios: either Western air defense systems are extremely ineffective… or the states in question are deliberately allowing their airspace to be used, meaning they are actively complicit in the aggression against Russia," he said.
...which is not the same thing. He's clearly referring to the incidents when Uirainian drones ended up in Finland and the Baltic states (which nobody denies).
-2
UpstairsRain60221 day ago
+2
Commenter: "Fake. No UA drones were routed over Baltic or Finnish airspace. The fault is Russian EW interference"
You: "It's not fake. It's an "if". So far it hasn't happened, as far as we know, but **if** it happens Russia reserves the right to act. It's not very strange, and not too much to get worked up about.
Article: "Shoigu alleged, without providing evidence, that Ukrainian drone attacks on Russia had increasingly been launched through Baltic states via Finland."
Weather intentional or not, shoigu is claiming these drones are coming through these airspaces, which we say is not true.
2
anders_hansson1 day ago
Title: "Russia threatens action against Finland, Baltics **if** Ukrainian drones strike via their airspace".
Commenter: "Fake".
What's fake? It's a warning. I suspect that many people missed the "if" and made their own assumptions.
Regarding what Sergei Shoigu actually said, it was (from TASS, which I'm not going to link here as it's often blocked in listnook subs):
>"В последнее время участились случаи, когда через Финляндию и страны Прибалтики осуществляются удары украинских беспилотников по России"
Which translates to:
>"Recently, there have been more frequent cases of Ukrainian drone strikes against Russia **via** Finland and the Baltic states."
I agree with the original commenter that Ukraine most likely did not intend for the drones to take those routes, but nevertheless, they did. This is documented and reported in several western articles (e.g. [Reuters - Finland reports territorial violation by drones, at least one from Ukraine](https://www.reuters.com/world/finland-reports-suspected-territorial-violation-by-drones-2026-03-29/)). I.e. it's not fake.
So, what is fake?
What the original commenter **seems** to imply is that Shoigu claims that Ukraine is intentionally using the airspace of Finland and the Baltic states to strike Russia. He is not. If he did, he would not leave the question open to wether it's due to incompetence or "these states knowingly provide their airspace".
Again, it's a **warning** that **if** neighbouring countries allow Ukraine to use their airspace to strike Russia, Russia reserves the right to take action in accordaince to Article 51 of the UN Charter.
0
UpstairsRain60221 day ago
+1
Alright, since youre adamant about it that shoigu is correct, show me the article that shows Ukrainian drones that landed/flew to russia via Finland and baltic states increasingly.
The article you linked makes a claim that the russian EW caused these drones to drift off course, as the original commenter stated as well
Also, the commenter didnt say "fake". You cant just delete the rest of the quote. Or i mean you can of course but it eats your credibility by quite alot
1
Veginite2 days ago
+21
Completely disagree. An eye for an eye. They launched aerial assaults through Belarus. You receive what you give.
21
anders_hansson2 days ago
-9
We're talking about different things. I commented against the notion that the Russian statement was fake. The warning isn't fake, right?
The article mentions a comment that can be interpreted in many ways:
>either Western air defense systems are extremely ineffective… or the states in question are deliberately allowing their airspace to be used
The whole point in war rhetoric is to be vague and leave things open to interpretation. In this case it's not fake, but it is part of a warning message.
Otherwise, what is fake?
-9
kahaveli2 days ago
+7
Yes, it's of course clear that Finland doesn't allow it's airspace to be used for attacking Russia, even though Finland of course supports Ukraine in multitude of ways. Because Russia would of course see that as an escalation. But there's no escalation between Finland and Russia, and that's the way Finland (and hopefully Russia too) wants to keep it.
But there has been comments where Russian politicians have implied that they have doubts that Finland's airspace is used to send the drones, like Shoigu in this article: "This could occur in two scenarios: either Western air defense systems are extremely ineffective… or the states in question are deliberately allowing their airspace to be used, meaning they are actively complicit in the aggression against Russia" - it's of course completely false that they would have come from Finland.
And from Russian newspapers there has been somewhat widespread speculation about it. The goal of it is probably to slightly stir the pot and change the narrative to that direction where Finland would be hostile against Russia, even when that is not the case.
7
anders_hansson2 days ago
+1
Agree. Especially *"But there's no escalation between Finland and Russia, and that's the way Finland (and hopefully Russia too) wants to keep it."* (I would even say "probably" rather than "hopefully").
It's all rhetoric, insinuations and warnings. But some people seem to interpret the title in creative ways.
1
EyeStabber2 days ago
+5
So Ukraine should f*** whole belarus up?
5
anders_hansson2 days ago
+2
That's not what I said. I didn't say that Russia should attack Finland. All I said is that the warning isn't fake.
That said, I believe that Ukraine "had the right" (as we put it these days) to attack Belarus, but I doubt that they want to go down that path.
2
i_am_a_lurker692 days ago
+43
False flag inc
43
SRM_Thornfoot2 days ago
+6
I don't think Russia really wants to get NATO fully involved by attacking Finland. Then again maybe that is Putin's ploy to be able to remain in power.
6
_Figaro2 days ago
+37
Spoiler: Ukrainian drones are NOT flying through their airspace (that was something made up by Russian state media). Most obvious false flag ever
37
L444ki2 days ago
-37
So where were the drones found in Finland going to if not to Russia?
-37
kahaveli2 days ago
+20
Ukraine attacked the oil depots/harbours at Ust-Luga (close to Estonia) and Primorsk/Koivisto (50km away from Finnish border) two weeks ago with hundreds of long-range drones sent from Ukraine or maybe even saboteurs inside Russia.
Only small part of them found their way into their goals - like over 90% were shot down, which is typical. And Russia actually reports how much they claim to have shot down every day. And 4 drones of these couple hundreds missed their targets and wandered to Finland and crashed here. There can be multiple reasons for this, like guidance system malfunction, and Russia of course tries to electronically interfere with the drones as much as they can (like jamming the GPS) which can also increase the likelihood.
So the drones were not send from Finland. I'm from Finland, and it's of course completely clear that Finland wouldn't allow the usage of air space for that. Russia knows this, but of course they are now implying and suspecting that, because it is in Russia's interest to make uncertainty about it even when they know that it is not true.
20
L444ki2 days ago
-39
Armed Ukranian drones breaching Finnish airspace is what happened. I don’t care what the reasons are, I just want Ukraine to stop playing games and putting Finnish people and society in danger. I do not want to end up in a war with Russia because Ukranians feel loke flying drones through Finland to hit Russian tagets.
-39
kahaveli2 days ago
+15
Ukraine is not "flying drones through Finland to hit Russia".
Don't try to twist the situation.
Ukraine is flying drones through Russia to hit Russia. And 4 of those drones (out of hundreds) got lost and crashed in Finnish forests.
That is itself of course unfortunate and should of course be avoided, but this incident that happened because of accident and caused no damage is not that big deal. Ukraine has the right to self-defence and they have the right to hit Russian oil infrastructure. If that hurts income of Russian state, that is good.
I'm from Finland, and there has not really been any demands for Ukraine either from general population or state leadership. Support for Ukraine continues, this doesn't change it.
15
L444ki2 days ago
-25
Wait you have the flight data for these drones or you just pulling this info out of thin air?
In the case you described Ukraine missed their target by 100km and accidentally flew into the wrong country. That is extremely reckless and highly unprofessional. This time it did not, what if next time the drones hit Finnish civilians or infrastructure? It feels very uncomfortable that a country we are supporting in their defensive war is “loosing” armed drones in ours.
If they can miss by 100km what exactly makes you so certain they cannot miss by as much and either enter Russian airspace from Finnish airspace or accidentally target Finland instead Russia?
Nobody is saying Ukraine does not have a right to defend itself, but why is me wanting to defend Finland from rogue armed drones somehow different? I don’t want Ukranians, Russians or anyone else flying armed drones in Finnish airspace without authorization, this should not be a hard thing to understand. I support Ukraine, but I do not want them striking Finland or through Finland even if it is by accident. The one thing these rogue drones have done is erode my trust in Ukraine ability to conduct this war. Going 100km off target into an other country does not look good for them. There is already enough tension in here in scandinavia, the last thing we need is Ukraine loosing control of a drone aroujd our borders.
-25
kahaveli2 days ago
+13
"Wait you have the flight data for these drones or you just pulling this info out of thin air?"
Very simple logical thinking. You seem to continuously respond every comment with some slightly simpleminded questions.
The target was in Primorsk. Ukraine bombed it with hundreds of drones. Russian anti-air forces were very active between Ukrainian border and Primorsk during that, according to Russian reports. Distance is long - around 1000km at least. It's really not that complicated.
I, like other people as well, think that 4 drones got lost was of course unfortunate. But you seem to honestly overreact a lot. I would recommend you to cool down a bit.
For me, Ukraine striking oil depots even near Finland is justified. It will hurt Russia's oil income. Of course, drones should be under control - but I also don't care that much if one of them comes and crash in a forest in Finland, even though it should be avoiden as much as possible.
13
L444ki2 days ago
-1
You seem to be making a case that “loosing” drones is no big deal and we should just not care. Can’t wait for you to defend Russia when they start “loosing” drones in th region amd how unfortunate that would be.
An other country flying armed drones is something we need to take seriously or we will end on a slippery slope.
No one is saying the strikes against Russia were not justified. That is not what we are talking about here. The question is how can we stop Ukrane from flying their armed drones into or through Finland. You don’t seem to care why flies what in here, and you are free to feel that way, but I do not want any unauthorized drones in Finnish airspace, especially ones that are meant for attacking the nuclear armed Russia on our border. Risking a conflict between Russia and Finland is not worth letting these thigs slip.
-1
kahaveli2 days ago
+14
"...or through Finland"
You continously imply that Ukraine would be using Finnish airspace for going through, even when there is no signs of that.
I just think that in the current situation, the current line of diplomacy has been the best option. So discussing directly with Ukraine, privately. Making some sort of public international scandal by escalating the situation (like you seem to write), is not in Finland's (or Ukraine's either) interest.
Of course such incidents are unfortunate and should be avoided. That what I have been commenting too, so we agree on it. But it can be discussed directly with Ukraine. Finland and Ukraine have good bilateral relations and leaders talk frequently. So I am really happy that there are no politicians or people that would unnecessarily make public escalatory comments about it.
14
L444ki2 days ago
The sign is the four drones that were found in Finland. You keep telling me that Ukraine had no control over them so what makes you so certain the mext batch could not have ended up back in Russia after crossing into Finland. Rogue drones are the issue here.
You may think that allowing armed drones with no one controlling them buzzing around is not worth telling Ukraine to stop sending them, but I do not agree with that. I wish my government would take this seriously and make sure it does not happen again ratger than gaslighting the population and disregarding the threat posed them. An other country flying armed drones into my country is a scandal and it needs to stop.
Ukraine sending armed drones into Finland is the worst thing they could do if they want to stay on good bilateral relations. Kinda sounds like you would bw willing to see civilian casualties in Finland as long as Ukraine is hitting Russian targets. Something we don’t agree on.
0
meacul2 days ago
+5
Don't need the flight data, because the Police in Finland have figured out and reported where the drones came to Finnish airspace, which is Russia. This is public knowledge at this point. So Russia should be better at anti-air and shouldn't let drones enter to Finnish airspace.
As usual the Ryssänkengännuolija is an idiot.
5
hoishinsauce2 days ago
+5
>Wait you have the flight data for these drones or you just pulling this info out of thin air?
You also pulled the scenario of Ukraine using Finnish air space out of thin air, you disingenuous nitwit.
5
L444ki2 days ago
+1
I pulled that scenario based on the fact that they did fly drones 100km into Finland.
1
hoishinsauce1 day ago
+1
"Using Finnish air space" and "have drone flew into" are two different scenarios. Was Russia using Romanian air space when their drone crashed there?
1
L444ki1 day ago
+1
Yes, when Russia flew drones into Romanian airspace, they were using Romanian airspace
1
Cephei1012 days ago
+9
You sir, sound prone to the hysterical. Figuratively and literally.
You're gonna be fine. Relax man.
9
L444ki2 days ago
-4
I am very calm, Im just having a hard time wrapping my head around people who are trying to tell me not to worry about unauthorized armed drones flying in my country. I do not want Finland to be dragged into the war because Ukraine is unable of keeping a handle on their drones.
-4
Aedeus2 days ago
+8
>Ukraine is more of a threat than Russia!
You all are so wildly transparent at this point 😭🥀
8
L444ki2 days ago
-2
I think you responded to the wrong comment with that quote
-2
Inevitable-Bison41792 days ago
+11
They came over ruszia border to finland. Take a guess.
11
L444ki2 days ago
-6
Why would Ukraine fly drones from Russia into Finland? Or are you saying that Russia attacked Finland?
-6
dawgh2 days ago
+10
lost connection and continued to finland, not rocket science
10
ButterflyExciting49721 hr ago
+1
you would assume that if drones lose connection they would have a failsafe not just continue flying aimlessly.
1
L444ki2 days ago
-6
So an accidental attack on Finnish soil by the Ukranians? Maybe not rocket science, but please don’t fly your armed drones around the baltics if don’t have the ability to control them. Going 100km into the wrong country is not something that should be acceptable and acting like this is normal and ok, just sets a dangerous example for anyone. Can’t wait for Russia to claim their drones in Finnish or Baltic airspace were headed into Ukraine amd just lost communication and people like yourself will come out of the woodwork defending them.
-6
einimea1 day ago
+2
Russia (well, Soviet Union) hit Finland accidentally with a damn missile already in 1984, from the Barents sea
2
L444ki1 day ago
+1
How does that justify Ukranian drones hitting us in 2026?
1
Cephei1012 days ago
+7
Because it's common? Malfunctions occur, this is the easiest explanation without more detail, but to suggest these c**** drones have 100% accurate guidance and control seems silly, at best.
Plus, who f****** cares. Russia attacks from Belarus on the regular.
Let them respond with their "action".
Maybe Finland will get added to the "extra, super unfriendly country" list.
😂
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unfriendly_countries_and_territories_list#:~:text=The%20list%20was%20first%20published,member%20not%20on%20the%20list.
7
L444ki2 days ago
-2
As a Finn I do care that there are unauthorized armed drones flying in our airspace. What do you mean by c****? These drones have 100km+ range and are carrying warheads. These are not some off the shelf DJI fpvs.
An attack coming from Finnish airspace into Russia would be a pretty huge thing. Maybe you don’t care if Russia attacks from Belarus, but I do care that Ukraine does not attack from Finland.
-2
Cephei1012 days ago
+7
Yes, c****. We're taking about weapons systems. In this context, they are ***very*** c****. There are things outside your personal scale of measurement, and this is one of those things. Sure, not c**** to you, random Finn guy. Butt that's not what we're discussing here, is it?
Instead of hiding and pretending that a European country not all that far from you is not being eaten alive while it's neighbors watch and appear to be A-OK mostly ignoring it and letting it happen, maybe see it from a bigger picture perspective.
You have no idea how the drones got there, like me, so instead of jumping to "the sky is falling when I'm trying to hide" mode, why not wait to find more information out first before freaking the f*** out.
Like, really, take a breath. You obviously need it. You'll be ok.
7
L444ki2 days ago
+2
I support Ukraine in their defensive war, but I do not want them flying armed drones in out airspace or attacking Russia from our airspace. As mich as I want Ukraije to win I do not want them to drag Finland into a war by attacking Russia from our airspace.
How is me not wanting unauthorized armed drones flying and landing in my country making me be “a-ok” with Russian aggression?
The only way to get a drone 100km into Finland is to fly it there.
You want Ukraine flying drone through your airspace that is fine by me, but don’t come here trying to gaslight me with “we have no idea how a drone got 100km into your contry” bs.
2
Drongo172 days ago
+13
They're going to send both remaining tanks into Finland
13
Alexander_Granite2 days ago
+8
Pulled by donkeys
8
Impossible-Ground-981 day ago
+1
with remaining boys inside
1
Superbunzil2 days ago
+9
"Threatens action"
With what?
9
countafit2 days ago
+7
With an attack on a NATO country. Real smart.
7
Coogher2 days ago
+7
Bla bla bla
7
UrineArtist2 days ago
+8
Pretty sure the Baltic nations or Finland just sending a strongly worded letter to Ukraine saying, "We do not condone the use of our airspace for drone attacks on Russia, also, here's the latest weather reports over Tartu that you were asking for..", would suffice.
8
Suspicious_Place12702 days ago
+3
it just means they're afraid of it actually happening, because they probably left some borders unguarded because of lack of manpower
3
calvinwho2 days ago
+3
Something famously happened to someone else in that area of the world when they split their forces to attack on two fronts too
3
PilotKnob2 days ago
+15
They didn't learn their lesson about Finland the last time around?
Finns are, pound for pound, the biggest badasses on the planet. I'm glad as hell they're on our side.
15
therealhairykrishna2 days ago
+14
I had lunch with some Finns a few months ago. They were nonchalantly talking about how they'd been brushing up on their cross country skiing and going to the range in case they got called up to kill a bunch of Russians.
14
AmazingUsername20012 days ago
-20
While the Finns put up an amazing fight in the Winter War, you realise that in less than half a year they eventually lost?
The Russians were eventually able to refine their tactics, and use their numerical advantage, similar to how almost all wars with Russia end up.
Finland lost to Russia for a second time in the Continuation War. Finland lost a huge amount of territory, including al of its Arctic access and their only northern port in Petsamo, a huge chunk of the North Eastern Salla municipalities, along with the whole of the eastern half of Finnish Karelia.
-20
ElkQuiet15412 days ago
+13
The winter war ended with an agreement that was far-fetched from the initial URSS claims to occupy Helsinki (URSS ended up winning but with unbearable/humiliating losses)
This was one of the reasons that conviced Hitler to attack the URSS later. He couldn't believe how the URSS, an enormous country, with almost 200 million people, couldn't defeat Finland with 4 million and thought the URSS army was completely incompetent.
13
AmazingUsername20012 days ago
-9
Right, but how did that work out for Hitler?
-9
doublebaconator2 days ago
+4
Judging by how much Russians love a Nazi like Putin. Hitler won Russia. Russians love nazism.
4
Suspicious_Place12702 days ago
+5
we know what's going back to finland if russia f*cks up a lot
5
PilotKnob2 days ago
+6
And that's exactly why I put the "pound for pound" statement in there. It took Russia quite a while to figure out how to best little ol' Finland.
6
Prestigious_Wall_8192 days ago
-12
The last time, the Finns lost 11% of their territory. I often travel through the territory of former Finland, and I don't mind if it expands even more.
-12
Jamuro2 days ago
+7
with what army. at this point north korea is better equipt than the rotten leftovers of the "bear"
7
Prestigious_Wall_8192 days ago
-10
During the World War 2, the Finns also thought so, and they paid the price. I wonder if the Finns still blame Russia for treacherously reducing their territory. Or is the problem that the Finns succumbed to German propaganda and took the wrong side?
-10
Jamuro2 days ago
+7
cute ... but not even the soviets were this incompetent. from biggest mechanized force on the planet to lada suicid squad.
noone is scared of the saber rattling of a nation this pathetic.
7
Prestigious_Wall_8192 days ago
-13
That's right, in fact, you shouldn't be afraid of Russia, you should be afraid of the increase in defense spending and your pocket, and the increase in the cost of everything, especially fuel. And I want to point out that Russia has nothing to do with it.
-13
Jamuro2 days ago
+7
posting this in a thread about russian threats is hilarious.
anyways we can easily afford to outspend russia.
its not exactly a well developed economy
7
Prestigious_Wall_8192 days ago
-1
You've already spent dozens or even hundreds of times more than Russia. And you'll spend just as much more. Is there any point in all this spending? What do the politicians tell you? I think I know what they say: you have to pay even more out of your own pocket, or else the evil Putin will come and take you over.
Are your bills already saying that prices are rising because of Putin?
-1
LindeRKV2 days ago
+6
Oh man, you are copying your posts straight out of kremlin playbook?
Sorry to break it to you but Putin won't help you out of this one.
6
Prestigious_Wall_8192 days ago
-2
I don't think that what I've written from the Kremlin's manual can affect the price of gas in Europe, the closure of European car factories, or major industrial enterprises in Europe. So, why don't you ask your government about Putin's involvement?
-2
Jamuro2 days ago
+5
wow you are delusional.
russia: roughly 150billion a year for now 5th year -> 750billion
eu: 210billion
usa: 175billion
not that it matters, western economies are so vastly bigger and more wealthy it isn't even funny.
5
Prestigious_Wall_8192 days ago
+1
Wait, something doesn't add up. A poor Russia, with 300 billion dollars frozen, is spending more on Ukraine than the entire Europe and the United States combined? You predicted that Russia's economy would collapse due to sanctions in 2022. I don't understand why Russia is still standing. It's incredible.
1
MikeSteamer2 days ago
+4
I guess Belarus will start to be bombed regularly.
4
Ed_Blue2 days ago
+5
[https://media1.tenor.com/m/9NZDPWStVKsAAAAd/simo-h%C3%A4y%C3%A4h.gif](https://media1.tenor.com/m/9NZDPWStVKsAAAAd/simo-h%C3%A4y%C3%A4h.gif)
This one sparks joy.
5
Suspicious_Place12702 days ago
+6
ah yes, the legendary sniper simo
he did not like killing, but he was damn good at doing that to the occupants
6
Limp-Exercise-3432 days ago
+2
cool, but theyre not striking through that airspace nor it ever will..
2
Ericridge2 days ago
+3
Putin just telling Zelensky how to make Putin attack NATO and get wrecked at this point. Lol
3
PRB74TX2 days ago
+3
Well, good luck with that Putin. You can't even take Ukraine but go ahead, piss off more countries.
3
sleepySleepai2 days ago
+3
please putin give us a reason to take Karjala back
3
nediamnori2 days ago
+3
A false flag operation seems to be under preparation.
3
Desperate-Natural1102 days ago
Pressure is building. The loss of puppet state Hungary will force a reaction. Will Orban contest the will of his people and attempt to overthrow the government?
The American experiment of governance has an important holiday 79 days away. A False flag on that date would have additional impact on gathered families, create another mass shared traumatic experience to manipulate emotions. We had all ridden on the same passenger planes used on those iconic towers, it was easy to imagine yourself experiencing the terror of passengers.
The economic engine is sputtering from tariffs and trade wars and is slowly coasting to a stop. Oil restrictions will have driven up food prices and the fall of OTR transportation, supply chains and manufacturing industries will cause mass layoffs.
0
GotRocksinmePockets2 days ago
+2
Yeah, suck the Finn's into it. That'll go well.
2
ClubSoda2 days ago
+2
Article 5
2
DjBiohazard912 days ago
+2
Nice, we get another movie where the snow starts speaking Finnish!
2
FederalGovernmentUS2 days ago
+2
The art of war - when you are strong, act weak. And when you are weak, act strong.
The Russians have been playing the worlds most high stakes p**** game, calling the bluff of the peaceful and prosperous West that we won’t risk our economy. But guess what, everything’s at risk now anyway. Best time to dig your heels in and prepare for hard days.
2
Marcipans2 days ago
+1
Ok whatever 😄
1
TheGinger_Ninja01 day ago
+1
Haista napa kanapaska
1
Itsatinyplanet1 day ago
+1
My money is on Finland if Putin were foolish enough to try anything.
Those 1980s cold war vintage weapons and starving gaggles of untrained conscripts are more of a danger and financial drain to Putin than Finland.
Russia will lose Crimea soon and Putin will be fighting to stay away from open windows.
1
Professional_Top84851 day ago
+1
If military operation isn't going well, it's no use to blame others for it.
1
mats_o421 day ago
+1
Lets see
You want your ports open.
Attacking A Nato and EU country would lead to Finish and Estonian Costal artillery having target practice on the ships going to those ports.
Swedish and German subs would pick of the rest
If they miss, there are a couple of hundreds of Nato strike fighters in the air
and to round it off - each and every of those ships has to pass Öresund area. Just a few mines and that's not gonna happened
As a bonus, the entrance to the black Sea will be closed to
Game Over Russia
1
Kris_17051 day ago
+1
Those Finnish pipsqueaks need a lesson...
Nazi loving Estonians also...🤷
1
CrewIndependent60421 day ago
+1
ruZZia is a cancer of the humankind.
1
FremenCoolAid19 hr ago
+1
Russian theatrics for the sheep
1
PerpetualFarter2 days ago
+1
He just bullies em all, eh?
Shitbag.
1
MoeSzyslakMonobrow2 days ago
+1
*yawn*
1
-password-invalid-2 days ago
+1
Remember when threats from Russia would sound scary.
1
deyaintready2 days ago
+1
They just want to be in the news
1
Standard_Program70422 days ago
Hows that expanded NATO border working out for you? lol
0
[deleted]2 days ago
-2
[deleted]
-2
Adventurous-Carob5102 days ago
+8
Except what would Finns do with 6m of russians, almost the same as in the whole Finland
Nobody wants to govern/occupy in that kind of situation 😅
8
Carbonistheft2 days ago
+3
I work in a department full of whiney assholes. Management position opened up last year. Nobody wanted to even apply for it. We all knew what would happen to the poor f***** that got it.
The new manager had an awesome attitude when he started. He's done the quickest slide into having no give a shit left I have ever seen in my life.
I can only assume that governing millions of Russians would look something like that. Just absolutely suck the joy out of day to day existence.
3
swamp_vomit2 days ago
+8
Kindly f*** off with that shit dude. No one here in Finland wants a war of any kind.
Recent events have shown that we don’t even have the means to deal with just two or three drones entering our airspace, I don’t even want to think what would happen if russia decided to send hundreds our way.
8
Heffe37372 days ago
-1
Fair enough. Deleted my original post. I wish nothing but success and happiness on Finland. Though I will maintain that were Russia to attack any NATO country, Europe would thoroughly beat the shit out of whatever Russia has left.
-1
myKind_ofPeople2 days ago
[ Removed by Listnook ]
0
FoundationLazy16642 days ago
Bring it, bitches!
0
dextrousfuckery2 days ago
?? They'll just flounder and send more people into the meat grinder, or..?
0
Apprehensive_Phase_32 days ago
-1
At this stage In pretty sure that a coordinated land attack from the Baltics Finland and Ukraine could have many chances to reach Moscow. You just have to look to that rogue general that aborted his attack close to Moscow
135 Comments