· 187 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 27, 2026 at 2:08 PM

Russia's economy minister admits "reserves have largely been used up"

Posted by fortune


Russia's economy minister admits 'reserves have largely been used up' while communist lawmaker warns of 1917-style revolution as GDP shrinks | Fortune
Fortune
Russia's economy minister admits 'reserves have largely been used up' while communist lawmaker warns of 1917-style revolution as GDP shrinks | Fortune
"If you (the government) do not urgently adopt financial, economic and other measures, by ‌autumn a repeat of what happened in ⁠1917 awaits us."

🚩 Report this post

187 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
big-papito 1 day ago +1718
I think they are trying to tell Putin, very, **very** gently, that he is f\*cked.
1718
TotoCocoAndBeaks 1 day ago +679
Only thing is, I find they are always lying, they say things are well when they are bad, and say things are bad when they want us to relax. They are probably readying some major phase of their terrorism Fond it frustrating that people like to accuse them of lying when they say things they don't want to hear, instead of understanding that almost all public statements are meant as propaganda
679
Ghede 1 day ago +124
The problem with authoritarian governments is the lying isn't one-sided. They don't just lie to the public, their enemies. They lie to themselves up and down the chain. Guy maintaining nuke who sold a critical part to feed his family, "This one broke, can't fix it", his supervisor "Maintenance should be complete in a month.", His supervisor "maintenance should be completed in a week." His supervisor "Maintenance will be finished tomorrow", his supervisor "We have two working nukes". Guy at the top had the last guy who told him there were 0 working nukes executed. Every person in the line was lying to protect themselves. If they start reporting bad news, either they can't be hurt by the guy above them, or the news they are covering is MUCH MUCH WORSE.
124
WASTELAND_RAVEN 1 day ago +203
That’s very fair, no one lies quite as much at the Russian gov
203
CharcoalGreyWolf 1 day ago +198
Well, I mean the US President, but one might consider him part of the Russian government
198
TheOriginalBroCone 1 day ago +67
While I get the sentiment, I just think Trump is literally insane
67
BenTramer 23 hr ago +61
Why not both? He’s literally insane and a Russian asset. Easy peasy
61
SuperRockyHobbyHorse 21 hr ago +31
He's also easily manipulated by the last person he talked to, but he's such a chaotic evil that he'll turn on them eventually.
31
Inspect1234 17 hr ago +9
You’d have to be insane to get into bed with Putin.
9
LieComfortable7764 14 hr ago -1
Just seems so unlikely a person in that situation would be a Russian spy and it’s not really funny any more.
-1
UhIsThisOneFree 1 day ago +33
Eh, the only consistent patterns through his behaviour are net benefits to Russia through various means, or pathetically obvious machinations to boost his own financial position. I think his mental instability and decline is a factor in a lot of his chaotically poor decisions but the only unifying patterns fall into the two areas above and that paints a picture imo.
33
dumbestsmartest 23 hr ago -12
Weird. I thought Listnook considered Trump an IDF agent these days. I hardly see anyone bring up the Russia friendly actions anymore.
-12
BenTramer 23 hr ago +27
I don’t know where you been hanging out but I see it posted on a daily basis. He’s a Russian asset.
27
dumbestsmartest 22 hr ago
I see a lot of bots post that he's an IDF asset or under their control whenever they talk about how terrible Israel and Jews are. Some even will fight back if you suggest he's anything but an Israeli puppet. I saw lots of the Russia agent Kasporov stuff back in 2022 but it seems to be dying out and being replaced with him being a Jewish puppet. So I guess the real question is he a double agent? Or do Russia and Israel have joint custody? Or the more terrifying thought that I'm starting to believe; he thinks they're helping and beneficial to him so he's just doing what he thinks will make him more popular with either so he can make more money. I still don't understand how he hadn't lost everything decades ago.
0
sixtus_clegane119 17 hr ago +6
Both Russia and Israel have the Epstein evidence against him
6
sixtus_clegane119 17 hr ago +5
To be a murderous dictator you have to be insane, you have to be devoid of empathy. Putin is not sane, he’s just not a chaotic buffoon like trump
5
blackjacktrial 15 hr ago +6
Not insane, just amoral. Morality would give you a reason not to do the internally consistent thing because it's bad. When you live in a world not of good and bad but practical and impractical, your actions are always self-serving because others interests are non-factors in decisions. It's not immorality (that means making the morally worse choice), because that would mean being bad for bad's sake, and that is the way of pantomime villainy. Instead, all decisions are based on the person's own wants and needs, and those are capricious and unmoored in terms of morality. True evil doesn't believe in good and bad. Just in can and can't do.
6
jlharper 19 hr ago +3
Insane people can lie.
3
RibsNGibs 13 hr ago +1
He does, also, lie incessantly. About small things and big things. About everything.
1
thephotoman 22 hr ago +6
He used to be a liar. Now, he’s a confabulator. That’s a lot worse, as it means he no longer has the cognitive capacity to know when he’s lying.
6
surmacrew 1 day ago +9
They've made it quite impossible to trust them even the slightest
9
petit_cochon 15 hr ago +2
I don't think he's had that ability for decades.
2
DemosthenesOrNah 18 hr ago +3
>We are the best cheaters. And how could you out-cheat us? You would need more experience Dr. Grigory Rodchenkov (Icarus, 2017)
3
PassionInitial7487 1 day ago +26
The way I see it is that if they're admitting this much, reality is probably much bleaker.
26
TotoCocoAndBeaks 1 day ago +29
I just think that when a known liar tells you what you want to hear, many people want to believe them. If someone is a known liar at absolutely best you can’t extract useful information from what they said. At worst you get scammed. The fastest way to get scammed is to believe someone who lies to you a lot when they are telling you what you want to hear
29
indigo-alien 20 hr ago +2
... and then it gets worse?
2
The_new_Osiris 20 hr ago +3
That is called selective reading. If you genuinely believe that the enemy is a skilled deceiver and engages in pervasive propaganda, you would never believe that they'd only ever portray the opposite when they are in a weak position. Appear weak when strong and strong when weak is age old mil-strategy wisdom.
3
John_Bruns_Wick 1 day ago +15
Exactly, when a russian minister 'admits' economy trouble, its pr9bably to inhibit an upcoming sanction or something, its never real
15
SoUpInYa 1 day ago +5
If this were the truth, would this minister be allowed to say it? And even if he did say it, would he expect to survive?
5
hoishinsauce 16 hr ago +2
Which is why it's important to look at who said it and on what capacity. Public announcements always has an agenda. Bad news coming from the mouth of regime apparatus is nothing new. One even became a meme "SHOIGU! GERASIMOV!". With the amount of clips and talking points coming out in the past few days, it's possible they're testing the water for Putin to make a decision to "save Russia". As for what that is, it's anybody's guess. It could range from ceasefire, to full mobilization. They're gearing up their population for something.
2
Pomegranate2026 1 day ago +2
And they started to 'admit' things are going bad after making billions from the Iran war...
2
BrainBlowX 22 hr ago +2
The "making billion" still is not enough to make up their enormous budget deficit.
2
Mewhomewhy 1 day ago +1
I agree with this. Nothing comes out of Russia unless it has a target. It’s good to have hope though.
1
theycallmeJTMoney 21 hr ago +1
I think this is a valid point, but based on the fact that it’s literally been raining oil in Russia lately became of strikes on their oil infrastructure, that it’s going pretty bad.
1
drthrax1 17 hr ago +1
My initial reaction was the opposite, that the fact they are saying they are low now means they were actually low months ago.
1
Darkfight 11 hr ago +1
They don't just straight up lie and stick to it, that's not their propaganda strategy. Their strategy is more like disinformation overload, they tell different lies with different amounts of truth mixed into that. They contradict their own previous lies on a constant basis. Their goal is not to make you believe their one lie, their goal is to make everything not believable eroding the belief in the existence of truth itself. And there's also the fact that they constantly lie to one another internally like the other guy said
1
FireMammoth 10 hr ago +1
I think you nailed it with their strategy, but at the same time the russian economy is straggling. Inflation was bad enough a year ago. With the successful refinery attacks by Ukraine their available resource of fuel to run the country is bad enough for their economy, so I dont think their average living standards are improving. Now they introduce harsher internet censorship, that has got to be in part to limit conversation about discontent, they would only worry about that if their economy was doing terribly.
1
kindanormle 22 hr ago +46
Rule of Thumb for international news is to assume what you're hearing is the propaganda, it's not related to what Putin is actually hearing privately. This would be a good time to feign desperation as it would give Trump an excuse to relax sanctions even more at a time when he's desperate to bring gas prices down before midterm elections. And anyways, we already know Russia's economy is in the gutter, that's not news and doesn't bear repeating in the media, so I'm going to assume this was more an "announcement" than a "scoop".
46
Plastic-Fox0293 13 hr ago +7
I've heard the Russian military bloggers are showing unusual cracks in their resolve over Ukraines success at droning their goons into near total ineffectiveness  And the move by Ukraine to gamify war has been both a resounding logistical success as well as a major blow to Russian morale. Blowing them up gets Ukrainian soldiers points. Those points can be redeemed for better gear, better drones and etc. So the most effective soldiers are organically receiving the most powerful equipment with very little overhead to facilitate the boost in effectiveness.  It's a little terrifying but it's working. And as a Russian soldier, the last thing you wanna hear is that the drone operators who are on a major killing spree are getting flooded with top tier stuff. That kind rumor is gonna linger with you as you set out to cross no man's land with little to no help as part of the endless meat trickle strategy russia uses to establish foot holds. And that trick isn't working like it used to either. They can eventually get a few dozen men in fox holes in a salient..  but then what? They just sit there under the constant whine of drones whizzing around with thermal cameras just waiting for them to peek out and expose themselves.  Nobody wants to make any bold assumptions yet, but if things go on as they are it seems Ukraine may be gradually gaining an upper hand. Black rain is falling in russia as kinetic sanctions continue and the Russian spring offensive simply didn't materialize because of the hammering they're taking. Ukraine set a goal for 50k Russian soldier casualties a month, well above Russian replacement rates. And they're just grinding it out.  Russia doesn't seem in any imminent threat of collapse just yet. But they are completely failing to achieve their goals and the pressure of this war is definitely wearing them down. Their war economy continues but they're cannibalizing their society to keep it going. Few of their troops are being properly equipped and trained for the missions they are given. And there's something called a death economy over there now. People sign contracts knowing they're gonna die but the payouts for their families is keeping whole regions economically afloat.  War is a horrible atrocious thing and this planet needs to take keeping craven monsters like putin out of power a lot more seriously. Because this never should have happened. It never should have gone on this long. It's just clear signs across the board that we all need to do a lot better than this at running our societies. 
7
Submissive-whims 1 day ago +36
I’ve seen headlines on it for years now. I’ll believe it when the ruble collapses.
36
GregorSamsanite 19 hr ago +12
Yeah, it's hard to believe that after all the ups and downs, the moment it would come to a head is when oil prices are back up to $100 a barrel with the potential to go much higher, and the US easing sanctions. And that they're eager for us to know this. I'm sure lower prices and sanctions for the past few years were depleting reserves, but their budget should look a lot healthier as long as the Iran situation is impacting global trade. There's not much informational value in official Russian statements. If they've chosen to project weakness all of a sudden, maybe they want Europe to turn their attention away from them for a bit or ease up on sanctions more. I doubt now of all moments is when their petrostate economy would falter.
12
DemosthenesOrNah 18 hr ago +3
> I’ll believe it when the ruble collapses. its been propped up by trump policies for 10 years now
3
tiradium 1 day ago +3
[ Removed by Listnook ]
3
bobbycorwin123 21 hr ago +1
Naa,  telling trump to keep the straights closed
1
asscrackbanditz 13 hr ago +1
Aka pulling a Dumbledore
1
2AvsOligarchs 12 hr ago +1
There's a reason he doesn't leave his dacha bunker anymore.
1
ScottOld 11 hr ago +1
Can't do that, he will very gently falll from a window
1
StrongFaithlessness5 1 day ago +1
I think this is just a show to pretend there is free speech in Russia.
1
Blademaster27 1 day ago +346
Reality is always worse than what Russia admits to. That means the economy is completely in the gutter.
346
socialistrob 21 hr ago +96
It's also very different than it was a few years ago. A few years ago it was basically a case of "the long term trends are bad but Russia has plenty of money in the short term" and now it's a case of "Russia has essentially burned through all their reserves and they keep barely scraping together enough cash to pay their costs on a month by month basis." I think sometimes people have this view that "if the war is still going on then that means the Russian economy is not doing that badly" but that's not really how it works. Russia is failing to advance and now even starting to lose territory because they don't have the money to buy the weapons they need to win. This isn't WWII where they can build massive factories in a few months to churn out modern weapons and now they have soldiers driving to war in minivans instead of tanks or armored vehicles. This is a product of a bad Russian economic situation and not because minivans are somehow "the best vehicle for storming Ukrainian defensive lines."
96
BNB_Laser_Cleaning 18 hr ago +27
At this point if resevres are used up they have to start printing money to maintain the internalized status quo of paying their troops, this will devalue everything and itll spiral from there
27
CustomerBusiness3919 16 hr ago +16
They've been printing money since 2023.
16
BNB_Laser_Cleaning 15 hr ago +8
They have an enourmous reserve fund they had been drawing on for the war effort, when that ran out/runs out is anyones guess
8
beklog 1 day ago +42
Yeah it look worse than what they're armitting
42
DueDisplay2185 22 hr ago +15
Wouldn't this prime China for a very easy takeover if they wanted? Just buy the neighbours resources for c**** and you'd pretty much double the size of your country
15
Stonedfiremine 20 hr ago +18
China enjoys massive beneficial mining, logging access to a lot of russian land. Im sure china will eventually reap the lands for its own when the the time is right to them.
18
EruantienAduialdraug 15 hr ago +13
There are strategic and propagandic benefits to direct control of Outer Manchuria (i.e. "righting the wrongs of the unequal treaties"). But that's a long way off, and would likely require a complete Russian collapse to make the risks make sense. Otherwise, yeah, it's easier and most likely cheaper for China to just negotiate access with Russia for the most part (or with the individual states should Moscow's grip on the colonies fail completely).
13
The_Holy_Turnip 1 day ago +755
I'm sure the US will step in and find more ways to move some funds to Putin
755
Financial_Comedian80 1 day ago +173
I mean....Iran war makes the whole world more likely to buy shadow fleet oil from russia or russian oil from India...what is said to the press and done right after is two different pair of shoes...
173
Lonely-Abalone-5104 1 day ago +73
Iran was a gift to Russia. High oil prices, delayed shipments of us weapons, excuse for trump to clown on nato etc
73
FrugalKrugman 22 hr ago +26
It’s not a gift, it was all a part of grand strategy laid out at the meeting in Alaska Nov 2025
26
Snigglybear 15 hr ago
U.S. sanctions didn’t mean anything because Europe kept buying Russian oil and gas. Europe basically funded Putin’s war in Ukraine since Russia made a quarter of a trillion dollars selling oil and gas to the European Union.
0
helm 11 hr ago +3
EU imports are way down compared to 2021. Especially gas. And the point of the sanctions was that Russian oil would flow, but at a ~$10 d*******. At below $50/barrel, Russia is not able to sustain the war in the long run. Now it’s Ukraine alone keeping Russian profits in check.
3
cteno4 1 day ago +43
Allow me to quote the article you’re commenting on: “A significant risk from external conditions is the situation in the Middle East,” Governor Elvira Nabiullina said at a briefing. “If the conflict drags on, the negative effects on the Russian economy will grow.”
43
AJaggens 22 hr ago +16
For context, Elvira Nabiullina is a head of Bank of Russia, and probably last professional person in entire government. She has been keeping economy afloat at any cost for years at this point, and (allegedly) tried to resign at least couple of times, but was denied by Putin. She is like Jerome Powell, and I'd always trust her estimations on how fucked everything is.
16
socialistrob 21 hr ago +11
> 'd always trust her estimations on how fucked everything is. There's a lot of people on listnook especially who seem to think that the Russian economy is so much stronger than it is. They'll say things like "yeah Russia is poor but they could easily keep fighting this war for another decade or two." At the same time you have people like Nabiullina openly talking about very serious challenges or even Putin talking about the prospect of recession.
11
TheRC135 17 hr ago +5
Yeah. Does anybody think Italy or Brazil could afford to maintain a war as large as Russia's invasion of Ukraine indefinitely? Because those countries have economies the same size as Russia. Russia's advantages were their perception as "world's #2 military," which they squandered in the first couple of weeks, and large reserves of money and old Soviet weaponry, both of which now appear pretty much depleted after years of war.
5
I_Reading_I 1 day ago +9
I would expect the Middle East conflict to be a net gain for their economy due to oil prices. Is there something else that would cause problems for them?
9
FlyingDiscsandJams 1 day ago +38
Ukraine blowing up all their infrastructure. Output is down 40% and dropping, their air defense systems are in tatters & drone attacks are scoring hits almost daily. Can't sell what ya don't make.
38
cammcken 23 hr ago +12
Rising oil prices may have encouraged Ukraine to strike more oil industry facilities, but only because the rising prices changed the cost/benefit of such attacks. If oil was c****, Russia would not generate as much revenue from oil exports, and Ukraine could see the same result without spending assets on attacks.
12
Anitapoop 1 day ago +11
Weren't they using Iranian and North korean ammo and drones. I'm sure that tossed their drone products down in the shit
11
TheGreatPornholio123 1 day ago +10
They've long established domestic Shaheed production in Russia now.
10
UniqueIndividual3579 1 day ago +5
Made with mostly Chinese parts.
5
socialistrob 21 hr ago +4
It's a little bit more complicated than that. High oil prices would mean Russia gets more energy revenue than they would have gotten but at the same time it also means higher inflation both for Russia and for all of Russia's trading partners. Russia still does a lot of trade with other countries (just not the west) and they've burned through so many financial reserves that they are not well positioned at all to handle a global recession. This isn't to say "Russia is screwed, expect anarchy next week" and it would be a deliberate misreading of my comment to say that's what I'm applying but Russia's economy is very much not saved by this either and is trading out one problem for another. Nabiullina is perhaps the most competent person in the Kremlin and if she's saying the Russian economy is facing a serious risk people should listen to her (but like any Kremlin official she shouldn't be your ONLY point of reference).
4
Haru1st 1 day ago +16
It’s what America voted for. Education? Social systems? Soft power? Nah, better bail out our boy, the war criminal and create the largest financial bubble in history to date… Wonder what that will lead to… Well at least no one’s talking about Epstein anymore…
16
PalpyTime 23 hr ago +1
Rather than outright trying to help Russia, is it possible that the US eases sanctions because they know it's already bad enough, and they can afford to ease them, to then use those sanctions as leverage and an economic weapon again later? Edit: Already the downvotes. My comment is a sincere question, and a serious contribution to discussion. Any insights would be appreciated, I'm just trying to understand the nuances of geo-politics.
1
Villag3Idiot 1 day ago +207
Sounds like some more oligarchs are going to tragically fall out of windows onto bullets and donating their wealth to Putin. 
207
Eclipse434343 1 day ago +42
My question is would that even be enough with the way they are burning resources like a billionaire here and there or even a chunk would only be a few weeks at most in $$$
42
Villag3Idiot 1 day ago +19
Just gotta burn more billionaires.
19
Quackstaddle 19 hr ago +2
Now there's a bumper sticker
2
socialistrob 21 hr ago +7
The oligarchs wealth is already essentially viewed by everyone as the Russian state's wealth. Putin can come in and order Russian businesses to do whatever he wants and if the Oligarch doesn't comply then they get removed and a new oligarch who does comply is put in. In the 1990s there was a time when the oligarchs held real power but those days are long gone and now the oligarch class is just made up of Putin loyalists and cronies.
7
thethirteantimes 1 day ago +7
No, no, you misunderstand... those oligarchs ARE the reserves... and they're almost used up!
7
Some-Band2225 1 day ago +106
> I expect to hear detailed reports today on the current economic situation and why the trajectory of macroeconomic indicators is currently below expectations,” Putin said. “Moreover, below the expectations of not only experts and analysts, but also the forecasts of the government itself and the central bank of Russia. Don’t worry, Putin is looking for the man responsible for this.
106
TheRC135 1 day ago +38
A whole country based on everybody lying to everybody. The boss is figuring out that he's been lied to, and expects answers.
38
TheWastelandWizard 1 day ago +1
Finding**
1
gbs5009 1 day ago +3
Deciding who will have been?
3
GrowthWithLogic 1 day ago +53
Reserves used up sounds like bro checked the account balance and just sighed 😭
53
socialistrob 21 hr ago +20
Yeah that's pretty much what happened. When the war started Nabiullina tried to resign because she knew just how bad this would be. Putin refused her resignation and she managed the Russian economy as best she could (and to be fair she did a better job than almost anyone thought possible) and now has been saying how the reserves are used up and things are looking grim.
20
Built4dominance 10 hr ago +1
Or he got troubles at the ATM.
1
Long_College_8342 22 hr ago +19
Well, I guess they could get the f*** out of Ukraine then.
19
yksvaan 1 day ago +121
Unfortunately large part of Russian population is complete zombies, as long as there is something to eat and vodka, they will just adapt and take it as if fate decided all, there's no way to influence anything.  Just something to keep in mind...
121
UniqueIndividual3579 1 day ago +28
That's tradition in Russia. Every chapter of a Russian history book ends with "And then it got worse".
28
phantom-firion 1 day ago +56
Yep the smart ones already left and arent comin back
56
Atharaphelun 20 hr ago +1
Everyone else would happily eat the hot, steaming excrement from their dear leader's putrid ass if it meant they can spit some of it at a neighboring country.
1
nicathor 1 day ago +30
Always so comforting that this perfectly describes the US as well
30
Chrissanxy 9 hr ago +3
you americans have actually 0 idea of what that means. you think you do, you see how russia is somewhat fucked and you think "oh yeah, we are just as bad!" But nope. Not even close. Idk whats this f***** with trying to put down your own country as much as possible, but its just not the same. how the f can it be the same lmao? just take a look at the US stats and Russia stats. People in the US live better than ppl in Russia. ofc some people in the major cities in rus will have an ok lifestyle, but that's not a given. even more so, you think you have "zombies". the maga rats, sure. But lmao you have 0 idea how bad it can get in russia. Their whole damn country was zombified by putin. At least in the US, you have somewhat of an illusion of democracy. Russia is straight up an authoritan state. fucks sakes people. you saying "the US is just as bad!!!" is straight up disingenuous. reminds me of victim mentality olympics. how pathetic and sad can you make your situation out to be, when its not comparable. ugh.
3
canspop 1 day ago +19
>and vodka A few Ukrainian drones sprinkling some debris over a few ruZZian vodka distilleries could be a tipping point.
19
socialistrob 21 hr ago +9
Eh leave the vodka strike the actual military targets. Alcoholism is a huge drain on the Russian economy. Hell there have even been a lot of complaints from Russian soldiers of artillery crews literally drinking on the job and completely missing targets as a result.
9
wKoS256N8It2 11 hr ago +3
Ah, so the vodka distilleries in Russia _are_ Ukrainian assets.
3
UniqueIndividual3579 1 day ago +4
Tipsy point.
4
Rocky_Mountain_Way 21 hr ago +1
Russian have potato. Potato make vodka.
1
GleepGlop2 18 hr ago +5
How unusual, must be the only country like that...
5
magnament 1 day ago +8
so just like everywhere else?
8
WingerRules 1 day ago +5
The people in the major cities are mixed, but every interview I've seen of Russians in smaller towns and rural areas are completely brainwashed. They get all of their information from state media.
5
MelangeBot 1 day ago +1
[ Removed by Listnook ]
1
EmmaFrostBroken 12 hr ago +1
Sounds familiar 
1
TiredOfDebates 1 day ago +1
I feel personally attacked. (Not a russian though.)
1
Barracuda_Tea 1 day ago +13
If they don't have foreign currency, they should just use Putin's ill-gotten gains.
13
vesparion 22 hr ago +12
That why Trump does everything to keep the strait closed
12
CP_Chronicler 1 day ago +9
Russia is not to be trusted. Do not let up until the people are out in the streets revolting against Putin, demanding an end to corruption. Even then, do not let up until he has been removed from office, turned over to the criminal courts for which there is currently an active warrant for his arrest, and he is convicted and sitting in prison.
9
TheNewGildedAge 16 hr ago +8
Imagine how much worse off they would be if the US just stayed focused, elected Harris or even an old guard Republican, and simply kept up the pressure with full support to Ukraine. Orban gone, the EU more united than ever with Britain starting to realize its mistake, Iran still probably crumbling under its own internal unrest with no one really willing or able to help them. Such a powerful position in the world and we just f****** tossed it for no goddamn reason. Our public discourse is infected by people who think everything happens overnight and it's killing us.
8
ViolenceIsBad 15 hr ago +6
90% of voters can't tell the difference between an old guard republican and trump, that's the problem
6
LilLebowskiAchiever 12 hr ago +2
We coulda had Nikki Haley. I hate 90% of her policy stances, but she was right on Ukraine.
2
srfrosky 20 hr ago +7
The problem when Rusia is against the wall, is that Putin starts yanking his orange gimp’s leash, who then starts thrashing the US and allies alike like a raged baboon, so it’s hard to get excited over Russian woes knowing what comes next.
7
lonelyashelloverwatc 1 day ago +7
Maybe they start betting on polymarket?
7
Staltrad 1 day ago +17
Better go to the basement now...
17
hellranger788 19 hr ago +10
I hope to see one day a headline of russian collapse across ukraine, because I keep seeing stuff like this but nothing really changing on the ground. "Russian forces decimated!" "Russia on verge of economic collapse!" Ukraine is fighting for their right to exist against a power that wants to plunder them for everything their worth and turn them into a vassal state. But ive seen posts like this for years now but nothing really concreates. Maybe im wrong and next week the war ends because Russia implodes, but who knows.
10
Fabulous_Chemical_ 1 day ago +34
This is a one in a lifetime chance to overthrow Russia but we have f****** Trump in office.
34
throwawayhyperbeam 1 day ago +22
Have Europe do it, then. The US can't even overthrow Iran.
22
Fabulous_Chemical_ 1 day ago -8
Europe can step up at any time. Nobody is standing in the way.
-8
Arbiter51x 23 hr ago +13
Well, Hungry was a sticking point until basically last week.
13
ChippieBW 22 hr ago -2
It will be Bulgaria soon
-2
Happily-Incorrect 22 hr ago +2
Pretty sure there's a big fucken pile of nukes in the way. Maybe we can convince Putin to pawn them for more war money. Then when he spends that we head in.
2
whoorenzone 22 hr ago +4
Let it to us Germans.. we will ramp up UAV production for Ukraine and are ready for NATO case. US is not needed anymore. Go play with the orange d*** .. nobody needs you 😂😂 You deliver just the best comedy for our grim European Zeitgeist. We could need some more tarrifs again 😂😂
4
Fun-Can-8935 1 day ago +9
look i get that putin is bad but yall need to stop overthrowing governments left and right. it has never turned out well
9
koolaidkirby 1 day ago +19
A foreign overthrow of a government has only "turned out well" twice, Germany + Japan after WW2. In terms of other government overthrows, the "successful" ones only really ever came from within (France, SK, Portugaul) and are only a handful of examples of where it turned out well. But a drop in the bucket compared to the cases where it made everything worse.
19
Fun-Can-8935 1 day ago +9
i wouldnt even call the WWII cases an overthrow. The context back then was so different. So many countries were in it to rebuild, there was a global monetary system, there was public investments. Germany and Japan were examples of Defeat and Rejuvenation. Anything after that was just US going in stirring shit and leaving
9
SkiingAway 1 day ago +6
Panama + Grenada both turned out pretty well. I would agree that it is generally a bad idea though.
6
david4069 1 day ago +1
> Panama + Grenada both turned out pretty well. I'd say it did. We got a 1980s Clint Eastwood movie out of Grenada.
1
phxees 1 day ago +2
Russia likely would not have risked as much if Trump wasn’t in office.
2
robotractor3000 1 day ago +7
The full scale invasion started in 2022
7
Akikiriri 1 day ago +6
*3 day special military operation. Trump being elected afterwards could have been the straw to the copium cannister and motivation to double down, but on the other hand I don't like to make Trump the main character of everything.
6
teagrum 1 day ago +2
They wouldn't have been able to prepare it if Trump had not been in office, its the same as inheriting economies, who is in office isn't as significant as who was in office while the situation developed.
2
phxees 1 day ago +1
They didn’t know it would have taken this long when it started. Since last year one square kilometer has cost Russia 93 casualties. They have started to spread themselves even thinner since Trump has been in office.
1
robotractor3000 1 day ago +1
I mean im sure theyre happy about trump being in office and im sure its helping but 2022 was the sort of “all the chips in” moment imo - from then on the doubling down has been practically required because they cannot lose this war and retain internal legitimacy + the sunk cost. I think no matter who was president come 2025 they would have had to keep going with what they have
1
Lonely-Abalone-5104 1 day ago -3
Let’s be honest it wouldn’t happen under democrats either
-3
Fabulous_Chemical_ 1 day ago +7
Just look at the difference in support. Biden treated Ukraine aid as a direct U.S. commitment funded by Congress. Trump has reframed it as a European responsibility, stopped seeking new U.S. appropriations. Reoublicans complained every day about funding Ukraine. Then turn around and say shit like this. Republicans live in a different world and I find it pathetic.
7
not_just_putin 1 day ago +9
God bless Ukraine.
9
AutistInPink 1 day ago +3
Are they open about the crisis to rally the people behind the leader in the time of need, maybe?
3
rdldr1 1 day ago +3
"Need help with that?" --Donald Trump, probably
3
spin_kick 1 day ago +3
What about all the gold in the wealth fund?
3
socialistrob 21 hr ago +3
A lot of it is being sold off. Right now the costs of the war and running the state are higher than the amount left in the wealth funds.
3
69goldeneye 15 hr ago +3
With the way Russia tries to appear to the outside world at all times and the smoke show they run 24/7 to muddy waters, we can assume that it's much... Much worse.
3
unfortunatebag 23 hr ago +7
You guys remember that time like 4 years ago when listnook was utterly convinced Putin was definitely going to die from a terminal illness within a year?
7
skinnernsk 20 hr ago -6
Friend, I'll tell you even more. Around 2006, exactly 20 years ago, I was 19 or 20 years old. I was young and receptive. YouTube and other sources were already full of videos and articles from "oppositionists" claiming that the Russian economy was doomed, that all production was collapsing, the infrastructure was falling apart, no one had any money, basically, everything was lost. Absolutely everything was lost, we were completely doomed, Putin was the worst evil for Russia. Again, I was stupid and receptive; I can't say I completely believed all of this, but I was worried and sincerely believed that things were bad. But then university, life, and other things somehow distracted me from this news, and I simply switched to something else. Amazingly, nothing collapsed or disappeared; on the contrary, the cities were getting better, the infrastructure was being updated, the range of goods was expanding, salaries and the standard of living were rising. And so, 20 years later, when I see all these news stories about how bad everything is in Russia, how everything is falling apart, the economy is collapsing, and everyone is suffering, I get a little worried again, but I already know the answer: I need to go outside and see people taking their children to kindergarten, teenagers to school, and adults to work. The roads are full of cars, many of which are quite expensive. Apartments in new buildings are selling out, store shelves are stocked with groceries, and the stores are always full of customers. Hospitals are open, museums, theaters, and nightclubs are always overcrowded. And I realize: damn, if you believe these articles, everything should have collapsed a long time ago. And then I thought – that's how Maidan happened in Ukraine. People were told for a long time and persistently how bad everything was in the country, how corruption was rampant, how ineffective the governance was – all the same things they told us. And the most important thing they need to do is to hand over the leadership of the country to pro-Western people who are always honest and fair, and then everyone will get rich and live happily.
-6
SubjectCollection642 11 hr ago +2
Sure enjoy drones
2
Sirix_8472 1 day ago +6
This guy's gonna fall out a window for telling the truth. He gave bad news and a bad outlook. The "decisions" he alludes to will either be severe economic ones or.....pulling out of the war(which he can't say).
6
alisru 1 day ago +3
Good time for China to have to play hero and save Iran *and* Russia from fascist Donny Don't Good thing they hold the strings
3
Backwardspellcaster 1 day ago +1
In vicious response to the situation Trump will either randomly fall viciously asleep, or shit his pants
1
_jump_yossarian 21 hr ago +6
That Tucker propaganda piece aged well.
6
Roakana 1 day ago +2
Bummer
2
agentsmithbobby 16 hr ago +2
YES grind Putin's Russia into dust!
2
hatemakingnames1 14 hr ago +2
Literally nothing to gain by continuing on being assholes, literally everything to gain by just not continuing on being assholes, but they went this far, so why not continue until their entire country is crippled? Biggest example of sunk cost fallacy ever
2
JSanko 14 hr ago +2
$0.7T loan to Russia when?
2
neptunereach 13 hr ago +2
It get’s worse but never low enough to cause change.
2
nhh 13 hr ago +2
I thought they are making plenty of dough under the don
2
MyAccountWasBanned7 1 day ago +3
The US has no economic reserves either. We actually tripled our debt in the last year and a half.
3
MagicSPA 1 day ago +5
Tripled the **deficit**, I hope you mean.
5
MyAccountWasBanned7 23 hr ago
Sorry, yes - that is actually what I meant.
0
Desertcow 23 hr ago +10
The main difference is that people want to lend to the US. While Trump may have put significant pressure on foreign investors to move away from US treasuries, they're still the gold standard for safe investments. Russia's reputation of telling foreign investors to pound sand, their economy stagnating hard, and the fact that none of this debt is being used for anything productive means it's much harder for Russia to borrow money compared to the US
10
baldobilly 22 hr ago +2
They’ve got plenty of natural resources which they can sell for hard currency or use for the own military and they aren’t nearly as reliant on foreign imports like the west is due to decades of import substitution. I don’t doubt their economy is down the drain but unfortunately that doesn’t take away their capacity to wage war. 
2
socialistrob 21 hr ago +2
Yep. The US has never defaulted on their debt once in a 200+ year history and has the largest economy in the world. There also aren't a ton of sanctions on the US. If you're a Chinese bank maybe you could loan money to Russia but that would risk getting your bank blacklisted and unable to do any interactions with the west. Even if you do loan money to the Kremlin do you really think you'll get it back? They're using the money mainly to buy weapons which get destroyed rather than invest in infrastructure which adds value to the economy.
2
Backwardspellcaster 1 day ago +5
Hm, I wonder what changed in the US over the last one and a half year...
5
Donc-qui-et-Quand64 1 day ago +2
wdym? https://www.us-debt-clock.com/data/debt-by-year fed debt has doubled since Trump 1 started, and the deficit peaked during the pandemic
2
Mewhomewhy 1 day ago +2
Someone is going to have to fall out a window to take the blame.
2
TheDarthSnarf 1 day ago +1
Is Fortune always paywalled now, or is it dynamic?
1
lordaddament 1 day ago +1
I mean obviously. Any video I see is some dude in his 40s+
1
ledow 1 day ago +1
[ Removed by Listnook ]
1
Altruistic_Ad_0 1 day ago +1
Just print money works for me
1
xegoba7006 1 day ago +1
Don't worry, the US is already helping them to fill them back by making the price of oil go up.
1
TiredOfDebates 1 day ago +8
Ukraine's strikes on Russian refineries and ports have severely dampened Russia's ability to export oil. Without a doubt, higher oil / natural gas prices benefit Russia. But Russia has limited ability to actually take advantage of these high prices. Russia's massive geography plus overwhelming corruption have made it easier for Ukrainian special forces to hit back at Russia's state-owned oil & gas producers.
8
loonyfly 1 day ago +1
I'm sure Putin has some reserves hidden in his couch.
1
D_Angelo_Vickers 1 day ago +6
Nope, JD fucked them away.
6
whorificustotalus 1 day ago +1
I don't understand how reserves have been used up, don't they still have a substantial sovereign wealth fund and vast gold reserves? Why not liquidate that?
1
Elegant_Accident2035 1 day ago +5
I thought it read they did sell a lot of gold a few weeks ago 🤷
5
socialistrob 21 hr ago +5
> I don't understand how reserves have been used up Because war is INSANELY expensive especially when they are trying to recruit 1,000+ volunteers daily by offering tens of thousands of USD in enlistment bonuses each. At the same time Russia also loses a lot of money to corruption and they've responded to the sanctions by subsidizing key industries which also is expensive. The price of oil has gone up which has helped but so have strikes on Russian energy infrastructure which means they can't get as much of it to market. Earlier in the war they had plenty of money saved up but those funds are largely exhausted leaving Russia no choice but to start cutting expenses and finding new and riskier sources of revenue.
5
King_Fisher99 23 hr ago +1
Putin = there is no problem
1
LengthinessShort7387 16 hr ago +1
+19
1
pint0xtreme 11 hr ago +1
F****** paywall
1
kyleharveybooks 1 day ago -4
I see a story every day saying the Russian economy is in shambles…. Let me know when it finally does collapse
-4
TiredOfDebates 1 day ago +5
It's been steadily worsening. However, western journalists are approaching Russia's economic issues using their own cultural understanding of "what that would mean." In functional democracies, the president needs to maintain the support of voters, mostly through protecting the economy (and thus standards of living in the modern world). In Russia, Iran, China, and the rest of the "one-party" governments with censorship and no free speech and limited rights to dissent... the authoritarian-type nations can ignore economic issues. I mean what are Russians going to do? In the USA / western democracies... you have to wait for a new election.... but there is a means of "getting rid of" war-mongering politicians and parties.
5
baldobilly 22 hr ago +1
The concerted attack of right wing parties across Europe against the living standards of their own citizens, and getting rewarded for it at the polls, disprove that statement. 
1
socialistrob 21 hr ago +1
> I mean what are Russians going to do? The problem is that poor people don't pay taxes. If the Russian economy is shit then businesses vanish and people have less money which means there is less tax revenue coming in. If you don't have the tax revenue coming in then you can't spend it on weapons for the war. If your army doesn't have weapons for the war then good luck overcoming Ukrainian defenses. Why did the Soviet Union make 100,000+ modern tanks and self propelled guns in WWII and yet today Russia isn't doing the same? Is it because Russians think that minivans are better for storming fortified defenses or is it because Russia doesn't have the resources to do the same today?
1
Lonely-Abalone-5104 1 day ago
Ya just like how Trump is going to face justice any day now. Every day for the last 10 years
0
Butt_Stuff_Profile 1 day ago -5
I've been hearing stories like this for like 3 years now.
-5
RegimientoInmemorial 1 day ago -5
No creo que sea verdad
-5
poppop702025 1 day ago -2
Look out below 😩😡😳
-2
← Back to Board