· 181 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Mar 31, 2026 at 9:33 PM

/r/WorldNews Discussion Thread: US and Israel launch attack on Iran; Iran retaliates (Thread #12)

Posted by WorldNewsMods


If you see any newsworthy information from a major news outlet or live broadcast, feel free to share a brief summary as a top-level comment in the discussion post. Other listnookors will appreciate if you include the source of where you read, saw, or heard the information.

🚩 Report this post

181 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
No-Negotiation2922 Apr 1, 2026 +1
Trump is expected to declare the Iran war is “winding down” in a primetime Oval Office address tonight, saying U.S. military objectives have been met. Trump is also set to shift responsibility for reopening the Strait of Hormuz onto European and regional allies. - POLITICO
1
jwsbtccfan Apr 1, 2026 +1
What a f****** Idiot, crashes the global economy then walks away and wants someone else to deal with it. President of peace my arse, get infantino on the phone get his peace prize back
1
itsatumbleweed Apr 1, 2026 +1
If that's actually how it goes, why wouldn't Iran just open the strait to everyone but the US and impose a toll on the everyone but US to rebuild? That sounds like a deal that will make Iran rich, continue to strain the oil economy, and make sure the US gets hit the hardest by oil shock.
1
Nyxbomb Apr 1, 2026 +1
So he’s basically saying, I’ve made a big mess now clean up after me thanks.
1
Intoxicating_Piss_69 Apr 1, 2026 +1
Mission accomplished!
1
anotherblog Apr 1, 2026 +1
Tomorrow: new mission! Ground troops
1
Cogitoergosumus Apr 1, 2026 +1
Isfahan's been exploding for the last couple hours, also feel like theirs a significant uptick in video's getting our of Iran lately. Curious how much that comes down to jammers being targeted or if groups are finding other ways to get footage out.
1
itsatumbleweed Apr 1, 2026 +1
Isn't that also a big oil region? I'm not great with my Iran geography.
1
Cogitoergosumus Apr 1, 2026 +1
It's their largest missile city base. The fires are from ordnance cooking off.
1
Phreekai Apr 1, 2026 +1
French Naval Chief says there’s no evidence the Strait of Hormuz is mined, contradicting earlier CNN reports, as Europe prepares a “coalition of the willing” to address the Middle East conflict and the strait closure.
1
Karpattata Apr 1, 2026 +1
Address it how? 
1
Nutmeg92 Apr 1, 2026 +1
Monitoring it very very hard
1
Troubleshooter11 Apr 1, 2026 +1
Diplomacy, probably. (Yes i know, that word makes people's eyes roll nowadays. But we've seen the alternative to diplomacy and what that got us)
1
Phreekai Apr 1, 2026 +1
By asking Iran to re-open the Strait.
1
zachxyz Apr 1, 2026 +1
A strongly written letter.
1
OnlyRise9816 Apr 1, 2026 +1
"Hans , Hans...you're breakin meh balls!"
1
eggmaker Apr 1, 2026 +1
>The U.S. military gave the president a plan to seize nearly 1,000 pounds of highly enriched uranium in Iran. The mission would require the airlift of potentially hundreds or thousands of troops and could take weeks. – WAPO
1
Troubleshooter11 Apr 1, 2026 +1
Thousands of US troops on the ground in the middle of Iran for several weeks, well within range of Iranian ballistic missiles and drones. That's insane.
1
itsatumbleweed Apr 1, 2026 +1
Did they really have a plan mocked up that may only require hundreds of troops? I read "hundreds *of* thousands" and believed that number.
1
jphamlore Apr 1, 2026 +1
And what radius would need to be completely cleared around the airstrip used to support this operation, presumably in Isfahan? Are we talking at least 10km? In an emergency, they're dropping Daisy Cutters and who knows what else to stop mass capture of prisoners? Like if a couple of transport planes are shot down?
1
CoffeeSubstantial851 Apr 1, 2026 +1
They would require constant close air support from A10s.... which we have moved quite a few into the region and are moving more.
1
teakhop Apr 1, 2026 +1
The U.S. military has given the president a plan to seize nearly 1,000 pounds of highly enriched uranium in Iran that would involve flying in excavation equipment and building a runway for cargo planes to take the radioactive material out, according to two people familiar with the matter. The complex plan was briefed to the president in the past week after he asked for a proposal, they said, as were its significant operational risks. --- My comment: Note that in Project Sapphire in 1994 to extract a slightly larger amount of HEU (WITH Kazakhstan's permission and help!) it took almost 30 days of people working 10+ hours a day to transport / organise and fly it all out. And Kazakhstan helped them then.
1
itsatumbleweed Apr 1, 2026 +1
So 2 to 3 weeks then. /s
1
Worth-Information451 Apr 1, 2026 +1
>Iran’s President Pezeshkian, in a letter to the American people, says Iran harbors no enmity toward ordinary Americans, calls portraying Iran as a threat “inconsistent with history and current facts,” and warns attacks on Iran’s infrastructure would have consequences beyond its borders. From his words the past few days it looks like Iran is becoming more and more nervious about the US assets continuing to flow in and some contries stating they're willing to open join in on opening the strait.
1
Dongsquad420Loki Apr 1, 2026 +1
funny didnt they also say they will attack tourist attractions or something?
1
itsatumbleweed Apr 1, 2026 +1
Do you have a link to the full letter?
1
o-_l_-o Apr 1, 2026 +1
They should have told US citizens that "Now is the time to seize control of your destiny and to unleash the prosperous and glorious future that is close within your reach."
1
Phreekai Apr 1, 2026 +1
Reports in Iran: The home of Kamal Kharazi, head of Iran’s Strategic Council for Foreign Relations, was attacked. His wife was killed and he sustained serious injuries.
1
Loose_Skill6641 Apr 1, 2026 +1
with bombs?
1
Phreekai Apr 1, 2026 +1
With sternly worded letters
1
MaxZorin1985 Apr 1, 2026 +1
They call that the “Schumer Maneuver”
1
jalepinocheezit Apr 1, 2026 +1
Ah, so the letters read "We will be checking in with Netanyahu to see if any of this is ok"
1
Nutmeg92 Apr 1, 2026 +1
Let me guess the letter from the Iranian president will be something like ‘we are a peace loving people but the US is manipulated by Israel to go to war we want reparations exc.’
1
isbBBQ Apr 1, 2026 +1
Bingo Nice one. Are you the Iranian president? Iran, by this very name, character, and identity – is one of the oldest continuous civilisations in human history. Iran has never, in its modern history, chosen the path of aggression, expansion, colonialism, or domination .… Iran has never initiated a war. Yet it has resolutely and bravely repelled those who have attacked it. He went on: Portraying Iran as a threat is neither consistent with historical reality nor with present-day observable facts. Such a perception is the product of political and economic whims of the powerful, the need to manufacture an enemy in order to justify pressure, maintain military dominance, sustain the arms industry, and control strategic markets.
1
Nutmeg92 Apr 1, 2026 +1
They aren’t exactly original
1
Hamiltonblewit Apr 1, 2026 +1
Are the proxies in Iraq, Syria (formerly Assad rule), Lebanon, and Yemen not meant to be major pillars of their imperialistic rule over the region? I wouldn’t complain if the country those groups are operating in and thriving, but let’s just say the slave labor and corruption in the Western aligned GCC is somehow more preferable than those proxies.
1
Emblemator Apr 1, 2026 +1
Iran's Shahed drones that are killing Europeans are just meant to show Iran's boundless love for us. We have all misunderstood the message.
1
itsatumbleweed Apr 1, 2026 +1
I would bet if the US withdraws they open the strait to everyone but the US and charge a tax on all the ships that do pass to find rebuilding. At least, that's what I would do if the US backed off now.
1
grchelp2018 Apr 1, 2026 +1
Set up a toll with the condition that it gets removed if they can guarantee an agreement that the US / Israel won't attack them for the next decade. Though I'm not sure if they can trust any country to enforce that.
1
Inevitable-Corgi-437 Apr 1, 2026 +1
It would be a terrible deal regardless from the U.S and Israel POV based on the language of that agreement. For example, let's say an Iranian funded attack took place in Israel...does that mean Israel can't retaliate or the straits of hormuz will be closed again?
1
Jest_out_for_a_Rip Apr 1, 2026 +1
It would be a great deal for the US and Israel. The Strait would be open for free. And if an Iranian funded attack happened, the US and Israel would say Iran provoked the attack and would bomb them again.
1
Spare_Advisor_1464 Apr 1, 2026 +1
Iran would just fund proxies and claim no responsibility. What happens then?
1
Jest_out_for_a_Rip Apr 1, 2026 +1
They get bombed. It doesn't matter what they say or what deal is signed. Why do you think a signed deal would actually prevent an attack?
1
Inevitable-Corgi-437 Apr 1, 2026 +1
The US and Israel would say..I mean..it just goes back to the status quo of the past 47 years. It offers no guarantees and does nothing to actually resolve anything. Of course Iran would deny any involvement in attacks on U.S or Israeli interests which they did pre-Hormuz. They use proxies to direct their attacks.
1
Jest_out_for_a_Rip Apr 1, 2026 +1
The US and Israel just set back Iran's military and industry a decade and demonstrated they can do it whenever they want to. If I was an Iranian leader, and I just watched my missile and drone program achieve basically nothing while my country got bombed into ruins, I might reflect on my next move. Israel can always come back an mow the grass if Iran acts up.
1
Inevitable-Corgi-437 Apr 1, 2026 +1
Revenge in Shia Persian culture can take decades to achieve. The Iranian regime is not going to just stop and think about it and back down from its revolutionary ideology. That's not how this works. You can make the argument of Trump launching the war and whether its good or bad, but the cat is out of the bag so to speak and we killed the Ayatollah. They aren't going to forget that and will look for ways to counter what was achieved moving forward making it more difficult in the future. Also, they will pursue nuclear weapons after this if left intact.
1
Jest_out_for_a_Rip Apr 1, 2026 +1
Yes. I know. And I imagine this is not the last campaign against Iran.
1
progress18 Apr 1, 2026 +1
>**Trump threatened to stop weapons for Ukraine unless Europe joined Hormuz coalition** >Donald Trump threatened to stop supplying weapons for Ukraine in order to pressure European allies to join a “coalition of the willing” to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, according to people briefed on the discussions. >The strait has been in effect closed by Iran after the US and Israel attacked the Islamic republic in late February, choking a route through which a fifth of the world’s oil typically passes. >The US president demanded Nato navies help him reopen the narrow waterway last month, but was rebuffed by European capitals which said it would be impossible while the conflict was ongoing, with several also pointing out that this was “not our war”. >Three officials familiar with the discussions said that Trump responded by threatening to stop supplies to Purl, Nato’s weapons procurement initiative for Ukraine funded by European countries. >—FT
1
Sea_Pension430 Apr 1, 2026 +1
Wait, so Europe is funding this... So Trump is threatening to cancel a weapon purchase? Like, refusing to sell to a willing customer? How does this end, I wonder? Likely with US defence companies losing a ton of customers over the world Once the US forces NATO countries to turn to an alternative you aren't going to get those sales back
1
starcom_magnate Apr 1, 2026 +1
See, the thing is, the European Countries actually like their citizens, and enjoy serving them. They don't actually want to put them in harm's way for a conflict they didn't start. Whereas the Trump Administration sees the citizens as being in service to him, and him only. If people get upset that soldiers died by enemy fire, or in an accident, it affects him in no way, shape, or form.
1
Wurm42 Apr 1, 2026 +1
The US Navy is bigger than the rest of the NATO navies combined! Why does he need them so badly? And can you blame the other NATO members for not wanting to put their ships under the command of Orange Julius and Kegsbreath??
1
Draig_werdd Apr 1, 2026 +1
> The US Navy is bigger than the rest of the NATO navies combined! Why does he need them so badly? Because he does not want US soldiers to die, or more accurately, he does not want the public to see pictures of dead US soldiers.
1
Andromeda39 Apr 1, 2026 +1
He doesn’t give a shit about US soldiers dying, he just knows it would be an extremely unpopular move and his voters would turn against him.
1
Draig_werdd Apr 1, 2026 +1
That's true.
1
bbbbbbbbbblah Apr 1, 2026 +1
he'll just wheel out one of his standard lines, "I like soldiers who don't get themselves killed" or similar, and MAGA will give him a standing ovation for it
1
PayneTrain181999 Apr 1, 2026 +1
Honestly, even those photos probably won’t change the minds of a lot of people. Some, sure, but the brainwashing is unthinkably bad
1
Sir-Knollte Apr 1, 2026 +1
He dont want it to succeed he wants a scapegoat why it will fail.
1
emaw63 Apr 1, 2026 +1
He'd rather somebody else's soldiers die for his fuckups, quite simply
1
itsatumbleweed Apr 1, 2026 +1
Sheesh. It keeps getting better. Maybe the announcement tonight is an ultimatum for NATO...
1
Inevitable-Corgi-437 Apr 1, 2026 +1
That is what I am thinking. He is going to lay out a case for disengaging from NATO. But he needs 2/3 of the Senate to go along with him for that to actually happen.
1
bbbbbbbbbblah Apr 1, 2026 +1
he doesn't need congress to functionally disconnect from NATO. He is the commander in chief, so short of being 25th'd he can just direct that the US will stop its funding, participating in exercises, will not respond to a mutual defence request, etc to quote trump, he has "many such cases" of finding ways around the checks and balances
1
sleven207 Apr 1, 2026 +1
> The Air Force is dispatching 18 A-10s to join roughly a dozen A-10s already in the region that U.S. commanders have used to attack Iranian boats and Iran-backed militias in Iraq, two Pentagon officials said on Wednesday. > per New York Times
1
emaw63 Apr 1, 2026 +1
Definitely the sort of thing you do when you plan on winding down the war
1
NoComfort6676 Apr 1, 2026 +1
Are more planes really the answer
1
LeftLane4PassingOnly Apr 1, 2026 +1
It really does depend on the question. A-10s fill a very specific role. If someone wants more it's mostly because they're useful in the role. I don't know what that role is but you do not want to be in a small boat or lightly armored vehicle when an A-10 is overhead.
1
zachxyz Apr 1, 2026 +1
These are used to take down drones and small boats.
1
wrldruler21 Apr 1, 2026 +1
The A-10 is meant to support ground troops
1
Gorvoslov Apr 1, 2026 +1
Unless they're British of course.
1
Crazy_Ad_7302 Apr 1, 2026 +1
they are using them to shoot down drones too
1
matthieuC Apr 1, 2026 +1
As a European I think I would rather have the US leave NATO and transform it as the skeleton of a European defense. Than the US staying while it's clear they have no intent to ever respect the treaty, freezing the broken organisation.
1
Emblemator Apr 1, 2026 +1
Unfortunately U.S. nuclear umbrella is what has kept the "no nuclear state has waged a real war against another nuclear state" fact going in Europe. If Europe loses the nuke shield, what stops increasingly desperate Putin from checking how that card plays out?
1
CoffeeSubstantial851 Apr 1, 2026 +1
The French and the British both have nukes. Europe doesn't need the US to have a nuclear deterrent in fact its literally french doctrine to have one.
1
Ok_Sea_1200 Apr 1, 2026 +1
I get what you're saying, but the world becomes more dangerous like this. Also this is basically like Brexit, the USA leaving NATO would be bad for Americans in the end. My hope is that it can survive this freakshow and hopefully some adults will be in the room again starting from 2028.
1
bbbbbbbbbblah Apr 1, 2026 +1
Trumpism is Brexit on steroids. At least the UK still maintains good, even great relations with its neighbours. I voted remain and I'd vote to rejoin tomorrow if I could, but I'll also admit that the UK didn't face the kind of pariah status and economic shock that the US is heading towards
1
matthieuC Apr 1, 2026 +1
You may have an adult in 2028, but wil you have one in 2032? Oh no President Democrat did not fix everything, time for SUPERMAGA I guess. You can't have an alliance where you roll the dice every 4 years to see if it will be respected.
1
DinkinFlickka Apr 1, 2026 +1
Europe is not immune to that problem either
1
twotoonies Apr 1, 2026 +1
As a Canadian I don't like either of these options.
1
tutamtumikia Apr 1, 2026 +1
By its very nature being an amalgamation of many states, it kind of is.
1
progress18 Apr 1, 2026 +37
>Trump, in his primetime address Wednesday, will cast the US as having met or exceeded all of its military goals, according to an official. These include: >• Destroying Iran’s ballistic missiles and production facilities >• Annihilating its navy >• Ensuring that Tehran’s proxies can no longer destabilize the region >• Ensuring that the country can never obtain a nuclear weapon >The speech will stress that the conclusion of operations may come in two to three weeks, the official said. >—Bloomberg
37
Pink_Lotus Apr 1, 2026 +1
I don't know anyone who believes a thing he says anymore, even the people who still admit to voting for him. And I live in one of the reddest states. November can't come fast enough.
1
SpiritualName2684 Apr 1, 2026 +1
Has Netanyahu cleared this?
1
EducationalCicada Apr 1, 2026 +26
Are you kidding me??? That could’ve been a tweet. In fact he‘s already said all that. This is what I get for thinking Trump actually had something significant to say for the first time in his life.
26
bbbbbbbbbblah Apr 1, 2026 +1
the best bit is that he's determined to do this on the same day where the country is making (positive) history by returning to the moon could he not have waited a day
1
SHUT_DOWN_EVERYTHING Apr 1, 2026 +1
There would be lots of talk about pens, drapery, ballroom and how he deserves a peace prize for ending the war he started. Those are missing from what the admin is feeding Bloomberg.
1
eggnogui Apr 1, 2026 +9
So, absolutely nothing to add to previous statements.
9
eggmaker Apr 1, 2026 +16
Oil futures market seems to be reacting to this -- it's going back up toward $100
16
eggnogui Apr 1, 2026 +1
They realized there is no relief coming.
1
Inevitable-Corgi-437 Apr 1, 2026 +4
You mean back down?
4
eggmaker Apr 1, 2026 +3
No- it had been sitting at ~98 for most of today
3
whorificustotalus Apr 1, 2026 +1
No, it has fallen since Trump's speech announcement. >Oil and gas stocks collectively declined on 1 April, with Exxon Mobil, Devon Energy, Occidental Petroleum, and Murphy Oil all dropping more than 5%. Chevron fell 4.5%, whilst ConocoPhillips dropped more than 4%. The sell-off came as Brent crude fell more than 4% to around $99.56 per barrel in early trading, slipping below $100 for the first time since 27 March.
1
eggmaker Apr 1, 2026 +1
oil *futures*. You're looking at oil company stocks; look at oil contracts and *after* early morning trading see ticker CL=F
1
Impossible-Bus1 Apr 1, 2026 +1
It was 118 yesterday.
1
BellacosePlayer Apr 1, 2026 +22
the end of the war is only 2 weeks away and has been for a month now
22
emaw63 Apr 1, 2026 +1
Trump does that shit all the time. He almost never means it when he says something is two weeks away
1
teakhop Apr 1, 2026 +1
I semi-seriously wonder if the military keeps saying something like "two more weeks, and we can destroy all the missile launchers"...
1
tedsmitts Apr 1, 2026 +8
It's been infrastructure week for like 10 years now
8
po000O0O0O Apr 1, 2026 +1
Except for that one week where Biden actually passed an infrastructure bill
1
DillBagner Apr 1, 2026 +14
Still wouldn't even make sense in make believe land if those were the goals. Why would the war continue for 3 weeks if all goals were met or exceeded?
14
asetniop Apr 1, 2026 +7
"I mean, Hegseth was having so much fun we just didn't have it in us to tell him it was past his bedtime."
7
itsatumbleweed Apr 1, 2026 +12
Wow. So he actually is caving on the strait opening up...
12
Sensitive_Pop4803 Apr 1, 2026 -2
Trump TACOs: see I knew it Trump pushes ahead with offensive action: I know he’s gonna taco x182828 (until he TACOs after several thousand bombs have been dropped all over the place) I know he’s gonna taco…. Any day now guys.
-2
emaw63 Apr 1, 2026 +1
That's the hazard of voting a habitual liar into office, nobody ever knows what the hell he's going to do because you can't trust the words coming out of his mouth. As I see it, it's best to judge him by his actions and not his words, and the US has spent the last few weeks building up a large presence of troops just outside of Iran
1
Conditionofpossible Apr 1, 2026 +29
Don't believe any of this. the USA is moving absurd amounts of assets and personnel into the region. That wouldn't be happening if we were just going to do 2 more weeks of bombing runs. This is just to calm the markets before he invades.
29
SnoopRocket Apr 1, 2026 +1
It’s not enough assets or dudes for what they’re going for, imo. Are they dumb enough to do it anyway? Absolutely. The guys at the top of the chain need to start making noise about this before it’s too late.
1
Crazy_Ad_7302 Apr 1, 2026 +1
they can't make noise with the maga d*** in their mouth
1
WISavant Apr 1, 2026 +1
The guys at the top of the chain that would have made noise are gone. Some of them are now under investigation by the FBI. There are no adults left in the room.
1
Skycourts_safety_rep Apr 1, 2026 +5
Exactly. Look at actions not words. They were also moving assets into the region before the strikes began, but they didn’t telegraph that to the world either.
5
itsatumbleweed Apr 1, 2026 +7
I agree with that. I was remarking that he listed the objectives of the war that were met, and said those were all his objectives, and opening the strait isn't one of them.
7
progress18 Apr 1, 2026 +22
>Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian will release an “important” letter addressing the American people, Tasnim reported, citing the deputy information officer at the president’s office. >—Bloomberg
22
Additional_Run_4214 Apr 1, 2026 +14
Well, that's a mailing list I didn't want to be on.
14
Chiinoe Apr 1, 2026 +3
Genius
3
itsatumbleweed Apr 1, 2026 +5
Any idea when it's being released? In conjunction with Trump's presser could be something big in the pipe.
5
Nutmeg92 Apr 1, 2026 +1
One hour ago they said within the hour
1
supposedlyitsme Apr 1, 2026 +1
Is it out yet?
1
progress18 Apr 1, 2026 +25
>For more than a decade President Trump has been intently focused on making sure Iran never had the nuclear fuel in hand to build a nuclear weapon. Until this morning, when he told Reuters in an interview, that he didn’t really care because it is “so far underground.” >Asked about the 970 pounds of near-bomb-grade enriched uranium that international inspectors say is likely buried at two sites in Iran — enough to make 10 to a dozen bombs — Mr. Trump said it was no longer a worry. >“We’ll always be watching it by satellite,” the president was quoted as saying. It was the second time in 24 hours Mr. Trump had declared that the nuclear problem with Iran had been solved, despite all evidence to the contrary. >—NYT
25
PedosoKJ Apr 1, 2026 +16
I’m assuming Trump is waiting for end of trading today or tomorrow to start the on ground invasion. Gotta pump the economy before anything else.
16
Doomergeneration Apr 1, 2026 -4
Ground invasion very unlikely I think, more than likely TACO and walk away from the whole thing leaving a mess
-4
SparksMKII Apr 1, 2026 +7
You don't move so many military assets halfway across the world to let them sit there doing nothing
7
Sea_Pension430 Apr 1, 2026 +1
You might, if your president is an idiot
1
Skycourts_safety_rep Apr 1, 2026 +4
Just moved 10k troops halfway across the world for fun? Either the straits open and the wars over or those troops are running around Iran
4
SpitefulSeagull Apr 1, 2026 +32
I don't understand how people can watch tens of thousands of troops and multiple aircraft carriers deployed to this area and y'all are still like "nah he wouldn't do that" He would do anything. Why do you keep giving him the benefit of the doubt
32
Jest_out_for_a_Rip Apr 1, 2026 +1
Well, media and social media have been feeding people the narrative that Trump always chickens out. So, they are basically conditioned to not believe that anything is ever happening. Which is honestly incredible, given how much he's shifted the Oveton Window by his actions.
1
ThunderChaser Apr 1, 2026 +1
People were saying the same thing during the buildup before the bombing started. During February we were seeing the largest build up of American aerial assets since the Gulf War, it was painfully obvious that something was going to happen but people were going “no no it’s just a show of force as strategy for their negotiations”
1
graviousishpsponge Apr 1, 2026 +1
Same shit said before Russia invaded.
1
CoyotesOnTheWing Apr 1, 2026 +3
Normalcy bias. Pretty stupid but extremely common.
3
StekenDeluxe Apr 1, 2026 +19
Have the carriers turned around? Until they do, I'm assuming some sort of ground operation is indeed in the works.
19
Grundlestiltskin_ Apr 1, 2026
One did actually leave recently, didn’t it?
0
teakhop Apr 1, 2026 +9
That was pretty much by necessity due to a fire. It was in the Med / Red Sea anyway, so wouldn't have helped much directly in any invasion.
9
itsatumbleweed Apr 1, 2026 +3
I think they dispatched another to replace it. Someone on here that knew a lot of nautical lingo estimated the replacement was about a month out. I think- it was a bit above my pay grade
3
eggmaker Apr 1, 2026 +6
With it being 2.5 hrs until the US market closes (and a few more hours before his speech), anybody else watching for a trading volume spike with no correlating up or down?
6
breakthebookie Apr 1, 2026 +1
Already happened look at spy
1
MWXDrummer Apr 1, 2026 +30
People please do not lose sleep to stay up to watch Trump’s address tonight. It’s not f****** worth it, I understand we all have a desire to know what’s going on the moment it happens. But I learned quite early on in the Ukraine war, that these speeches get hyped up so much and then ultimately nothing of significance is said.  I remember people would get all worked up over what Putin would say early on in the Ukraine war. Then it would be a long snooze fest. 
30
claimstoknowpeople Apr 1, 2026 +4
It's 9pm eastern, no American needs to "stay up" for that
4
MWXDrummer Apr 1, 2026 +4
Sorry I should have be more specific, I’m more talking about people overseas in different time zones. 
4
Bunker_Bertil Apr 1, 2026 +8
Staying late to up to watch the Artemis 2 launch 
8
TheJessKiddin Apr 1, 2026 +4
This is the right choice
4
tutamtumikia Apr 1, 2026 +5
Exactly. Something actually worthwhile!
5
Rabid_Mongoose Apr 1, 2026 +3
I'm sure it will be just like every other rally. Dems fault for Iran, gas prices. More claims of election fraud and how his new EO will 'fix' it.
3
a_saddler Apr 1, 2026 +22
I swear if I stay up till 3 AM and he starts ranting about his ballroom I'm gonna lose my god damn mind
22
teakhop Apr 1, 2026 +4
Make sure to eat some Tacos if you do watch!
4
LesserShambler Apr 1, 2026 +3
Literally every time I’ve gone to the effort of watching that idiot live it’s not been worth it. Rambling f****** nonsense. Just get the TLDR in the morning
3
phyneas Apr 1, 2026 +5
Don't bother staying up, then, because there's a pretty good chance that's what it will be. That, or "windmills", or moaning about NATO, or mail-in voting, or maybe he'll get distracted and start yapping about Greenland again. The absolute best case scenario is that they'll pump him full of enough drugs to overcome his sundowning long enough for him to stand there for five minutes and read some vague bullshit from a teleprompter in a mumbling monotone before falling asleep. What it won't be is anything worth hearing about in real time; just read the news in the morning to get a summary of whatever nonsense he ends up spouting.
5
DillBagner Apr 1, 2026 +10
It's not worth it to stay up for him saying anything. It's always going to be stupid bullshit that he may or may not completely flip flop on by either the next sentence or the next day. Just get your rest and read about whatever it is when you get up.
10
Sanchezq Apr 1, 2026 +14
I guarantee it won’t be worth staying up till 3 AM. Trump speeches suck.
14
Covert_Cuttlefish Apr 1, 2026 +17
Why on earth would you stay up until the middle of the night listen to the ranting of a madman?
17
samusaranx3 Apr 1, 2026 +14
You could just not do that. There will be no benefits and only negative consequences to you staying up to listen to Trump speak.
14
emaw63 Apr 1, 2026 +3
I legit can't listen to him anymore. I just read transcripts and articles if I must know what he says
3
itsatumbleweed Apr 1, 2026 +1
He said it will be about Iran. I suspect it's an announced ground invasion, or an ultimatum of "peace deal by x or ground invasion", but I don't know obviously.
1
Friendly-Profit-8590 Apr 1, 2026 +1
Ultimatum to NATO perhaps
1
AprilsMostAmazing Apr 1, 2026 -3
It's going to be a peace deal announcement so the epstein class can profit off their calls. They'll put in purs tomorrow and then after 5 pm Trump will announce ground invasion
-3
Nyxbomb Apr 1, 2026 +2
Why would you announce a ground invasion, surely you’d want to do it by surprise? I have no idea about how all this works though
2
whorificustotalus Apr 1, 2026 +2
Yes, ground invasions are usually announced when they're already in progress. It would be irresponsible to announce one beforehand.
2
itsatumbleweed Apr 1, 2026 +1
I'm not really holding this admin to any level of responsibility.
1
progress18 Apr 1, 2026 +14
>**Air Force reactivates Reaper drone squadron at Nevada base** > The Air Force has reactivated a squadron in Nevada that flies the MQ-9 Reaper, the unmanned, heavily armed drone that is entering its third decade of flying. >…with its reactivation, the 42nd ‘s drones will have a capability they previously did not. >Previous Reapers used in Afghanistan needed a set of pilots to be in “line-of-sight” control of the plane during take-off and landing, while the actual missions were handed off to crews based in the U.S. or elsewhere. But new technology automates take-offs and landings, which can now be controlled by satellite. As a result, fewer airmen are needed for those missions, and dedicated Reaper units can focus on reconnaissance and strike missions. >… >The 4,900-pound drone is operated by pilots at remote bases. Reapers are built to fly for as long as a full day, and have a 66-foot wingspan and 36-foot fuselage, making them useful for both intelligence gathering and strike weapons. Reapers can carry up to eight Hellfire missiles and precision-guided bombs. >The reactivation is part of a larger Air Force reorganization of its MQ-9 Reaper units… >… > U.S. Central Command has released several videos that appear to show operations from the drone’s camera feed, including U.S. weapons destroying Iranian aircraft. >Cantwell said that the war with Iran has shown the importance of space-based intelligence, and history has shown that using fighter jets is a relatively expensive way to find targets. >“But the MQ-9s have been tremendously successful, finding dozens, if not hundreds, of mobile targets,” Cantwell said. “These have been mobile missile launchers, these have been drone launchers. These have reduced the threat to both the U.S. forces and our allies.” >However, the MQ-9 is not as invincible in the skies as it once was over a mostly-defanged Afghanistan and Iraq. >In the war’s early weeks, Iran has shot down at least 10 of them, according to reports from Air & Space Magazine and CBS News. The Reaper’s survivability was also tested last year when the Houthis shot down 7 US Reaper drones worth a total of $200 million over Yemen in March and April 2025 during the group’s assault on commercial vessels transiting the Red Sea. >—[T&P](https://taskandpurpose.com/news/reaper-unit-activated-creech/)
14
BasesJuicedNoOuts Apr 1, 2026 +7
I find it funny how much everyone here takes everything the IRCG says at face value
7
kitsune Apr 1, 2026 +3
Who does? Exactly no one.
3
putin_my_ass Apr 1, 2026 +13
You'd have to be insane to not believe they're both lying. It's war.
13
LeftLane4PassingOnly Apr 1, 2026 +3
Neither needs the cover of war for reasons to lie. All they need is a day that ends in 'y'.
3
StekenDeluxe Apr 1, 2026 +6
... Like who? I can't think of a single person.
6
Cold_Specialist_3656 Apr 1, 2026 -5
So far they've proven just as trustworthy if not more so than Trump 
-5
itsFelbourne Apr 1, 2026 +13
They are every bit as trustworthy as Trump; not at all You can tell it is a lot of American listnookors first serious war because they think anyone actively involved in the conflict is telling “the truth”
13
Sensitive_Pop4803 Apr 1, 2026 +9
We need to all sit down for a moment and be careful about this. Don’t start saying things just because you wish for them to be true. Whether you’re saying trump will destroy IRGC, or whether IRGC will destroy trump, you don’t know anything for sure. Yet all I see are people making stuff up, and then 2 or 3 other people comment under it going “trueeee bro trueeeee” and it’s literally just a wishlist instead of any solid insight. The fact of the matter is none of us know anything in depth about what’s coming, so stay humble and be ready to be wrong, and then let go of wrongly held views as you get new information. Please.
9
itsatumbleweed Apr 1, 2026 +6
That's not entirely true. We know that the economic fallout from the war is just ramping up, for example. Most countries are still receiving pre-war shipments from the strait, but those will run out and even if the war ended today there's going to be a gap. But I do agree that at this moment, the IRCG and the Trump admin are equally unreliable, and what happens logistically is something we won't know until it happens.
6
CaptainJimJames Apr 1, 2026 +1
It is true. Just like tariffs, the economic fallout is priced in even if there are tail effects. You are looking for new unknown information that can have "new" economic impact. You will end up sounding like the tariff doom bro's after last April. You want to parse carefully from tonight's speech if there is any new information. Hope that helps.
1
itsatumbleweed Apr 1, 2026 +5
This isn't idle speculation on my part. The IEA chief himself said *last week* that when the shortages hit we will see the worst oil shock in history, and that was based on the set of things we had seen through last week with no presuppositions on what the future holds. He said it's coming and it has been set in motion. You can make predictions if you pay attention to what well informed forecasters are saying. If you don't you're going to be sitting around saying "no one could have seen this coming" when the experts all saw it coming.
5
progress18 Apr 1, 2026 +7
> **USS Gerald R. Ford deployment could be extended to nearly a year amid ‘challenging time,’ admiral says** > > The aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford could be deployed for nearly a year, the Navy’s top commanding officer said this week. > > Ford likely will go into a “record-breaking” 11th month of operations, said Adm. Daryl Caudle, chief of naval operations, Tuesday at the Washington D.C.-based think tank Center for Strategic and International Studies. > > He added that the carrier had received a much-needed reset, including time at U.S. Naval Support Activity Souda Bay in Greece for repairs following a laundry room fire last month and a port call in Split, Croatia. > > Ford and her crew would be “back on station again here soon,” said Caudle. He did not indicate if Ford would remain in the Mediterranean Sea or go back into the Red Sea in support of the U.S.-Israel campaign against Iran, which is now in its fifth week. > > Its destroyer e****** — USS Bainbridge, USS Winston S. Churchill and USS Mahan — also have left the Middle East, having made the northbound transit through the Suez Canal, USNI News reported Monday. > > The aircraft carrier USS George H.W. Bush, anticipated to relieve Ford, left its homeport in Norfolk, Va., on Tuesday to begin operations for its deployment, the Navy said in a statement. > > The Pentagon has not specifically said where Bush will go, but it reportedly will head to the U.S. Naval Forces Europe-Africa/U.S. 6th Fleet area of operations, which includes the eastern Mediterranean Sea. > > —[S&S](https://www.stripes.com/branches/navy/2026-04-01/ford-navy-long-deployment-21247549.html)
7
PositiveUse Apr 1, 2026 +5
For context because it’s easy to misinterpret: the Ford is already in mission for 280 or so days. So this doesn’t mean that the carrier will sit in front of Iran for another year…
5
jaymef Apr 1, 2026 -1
Think of how much money that will all cost
-1
ScumbagGina Apr 1, 2026 +1
I thought the reports were that it was going to be under repairs for the next 14 months due to the damage from the “laundry fire”?
1
Sthrax Apr 1, 2026 +5
If it needed 14 months for repair, it wouldn't be sent to Souda Bay. That kind of work generally means Norfolk/Hampton Roads or Portsmouth (or Puget Sound or Pearl Harbor for the Pacific Fleet).
5
ScumbagGina Apr 1, 2026
I believed the most recent news was that it departed Souda and was headed home.
0
Sthrax Apr 1, 2026 +2
The article above indicated it would head back to the eastern Med or the Red Sea to continue operations. I actually would be happy if it was headed home though, they've already been at sea for a longer tour than typical.
2
DozingUnderTheSun Apr 1, 2026 +2
Wow, that's insane!
2
EducationalCicada Apr 1, 2026
Where can I watch Trump’s address live? I want to be part of history.
0
Ryan526 Apr 1, 2026 +2
Will be live on the Whitehouse YouTube channel
2
itsatumbleweed Apr 1, 2026 +4
Any bets on what it is? I think he's announcing the ground invasion.
4
Garionreturns2 Apr 1, 2026 +8
I'm guessing that he's going to declare victory. Whatever he says will probably not matter much either way
8
H5rs Apr 1, 2026 +2
Is this not for another 8 hours?! Same time as the launch?
2
Rsodyyy Apr 1, 2026 +3
Yes 8 hours on the dot lol. Trump would probably start the ground invasion now and then talk about the success tonight. I doubt he’ll announce it to the world and then start it (that’s if there is a ground invasion)
3
H5rs Apr 1, 2026 +1
Yeah some classic mental gymnastics, I can see the markets not even care soon
1
jaymef Apr 1, 2026 +2
youtube live
2
← Back to Board