“You eat pieces of shit for breakfast?”
Had to be said. If you don’t know the reference, don’t worry.
9
silkspith2 days ago
+3
This comment makes me Happy.
3
TheFlyingBoxcar2 days ago
+3
It made me Gilmore.
3
disdain72 days ago
+1
Gilmour? I love Pink Floyd!
1
pikachus_ghost_uncle2 days ago
+1
Aww horse apples
1
IlVeroStronzo2 days ago
+1
Yup, that w**** has some apples
1
this_is_greenman2 days ago
+1
No that comes afterwards
1
IBlockInsufferables2 days ago
+11
Not the best market. While horses do wear shoes, they can't ride a bicycle and thus are only worth half as much projected sales.
11
18VON4T2 days ago
+4
Horses are up 84%, too expensive allready,
4
goingfullretard-orig2 days ago
That's a similar percentage to how far Trump's head is up his... ass.
0
Ancient-Bat17552 days ago
+3
Horses require too much feed and water, just work from home
3
svxae2 days ago
+1
camels, too. they are a bit on the pricier side, though.
1
MooPig482 days ago
+1
More expensive than gas
-horse owner
1
liventruth2 days ago
+7
Won't help. Most soles of shoes and bicycle tires depend on petroleum to happen.
7
ginsunuva2 days ago
+4
Okay but it’s not like there’s zero petroleum
4
liventruth2 days ago
+1
True. It appears that investing in shoes and bicycles will somehow avert the weight of rising petroleum costs. It will not.
1
Defiant-Peace-4932 days ago
+1
A schwinning move.
1
Icy-Comfortable-7142 days ago
+108
Did we make it 24 hours?
108
fury4202 days ago
+18
Nah, Iran was launching attacks within 30 minutes of the ceasefire allegedly starting.
18
Th3_Admiral_2 days ago
+114
I had read Israel was bombing Lebanon within 15 minutes of the ceasefire. Then again, it sounds like neither side actually agreed to any specific terms of the ceasefire (such as not attacking Iran's proxies) and Israel wasn't even a part of it to begin with, so it's hard to say who is actually to blame here. Everyone I guess.
114
metarx2 days ago
+19
Well... "We are" really (the US)... Had trump not been elected, we wouldn't be here.. if trump wasn't an enormous piece of shit who's easily coereced or blackmailed, we wouldn't be here.. etc etc.. thanks maga, and non voters, you're all to blame.
19
Virtual-History-60992 days ago
+4
Plus Israel won't tolerate aggression on its north regardless of any ceasefire.
4
Strykerz3r02 days ago
+51
In response to Israel breaking the agreement by attacking Lebanon.
51
fury4202 days ago
-11
There seems to be a great deal of uncertainty whether Lebanon was part of the agreement or not, and based on the live threads i've looked at the reports of Israel attacking Lebanon are from hours later.
-11
IOnlyFearOFGod2 days ago
+29
Pakistan (who is basically hermes(messenger) atp) did state that Lebanon was within the agreement (which Iran agreed to), but both USA and Israel denied that.
And Iran cracking the ceasefire for Lebanon shows that what Iran agreed to was that Lebanon is within the ceasefire agreement.
at least from what i see, you can prove me wrong though.
29
fury4202 days ago
+3
Here's the initial public statement by Iran's foreign minister, no mention of Lebanon at all. The corresponding American statements from last night don't mention Lebanon either.
https://x.com/araghchi/status/2041655156215799821
3
get_it_together12 days ago
+16
Iran’s ten point plan clearly includes an end to attacks on Iran and its allies, Lebanon is clearly in that group.
16
fury4202 days ago
+8
Yes, but Iran's ten point plan was not the actual agreement reached yesterday between the three warring parties.
8
get_it_together12 days ago
+15
Clearly there was no actual agreement reached. You linked to a statement from Iran referencing their ten point plan, which US and Israel didn’t agree with, and so the “cease fire” lasted for all of fifteen minutes.
15
fury4202 days ago
+3
Yeah, the statement references both the Iranian 10 point and the American 15 point plans so I think it's safe to say there was no meeting of the minds on those points.
I get the impression that yesterday's "agreement" was just the most basic middle ground of a Iran/US/Israel ceasefire + reopening of Hormuz, ahead of actual negotiations about all the specific details, and that the only consensus was effectively about the part after "I hearby declare on behalf of the Iran's SNSC.."
3
IOnlyFearOFGod2 days ago
oh ok
0
CogitoCollab2 days ago
+14
That's because of their decentralized command structure.
It takes a bit to send messages.
Israel simply just keeps bombing Lebanon so Iran hasn't opened the strait.
Note Israel has killed the most journalists since it started being tracked in 1992.
14
EpicRedditor342 days ago
+2
The beauty of decap strikes
2
Designed_02 days ago
+1
You mean Isreal
1
TotalBismuth2 days ago
Maybe it was a ceasefire with the US and not with anyone else.
0
Jim-be2 days ago
+18
Of course it was attacked. That was too easy. And they will fix it and the next day it will be attacked again. This will go one forever because you can’t really defend a pipeline.
18
Fywq2 days ago
+8
Yeah I have been surprised it hasn't been targeted more. It is KSA's way to bypass the Strait of Hormuz. Ofc it would be targeted.
8
sandm0002 days ago
+15
> One of the people said it had been attacked by a drone and.
Hmm. Are there copy editors anymore?
I know it continues 2 lines down, but that isn’t a complete thought.
15
ProbablyBanksy2 days ago
+3
Editors are expensive and
3
copperblood2 days ago
+23
Shai-Hulud
23
Webs_Lives2 days ago
+1
Is strong
1
imaginary_num6er2 days ago
+7
When are the gulf states going to be in the poor house?
7
Master-CylinderPants2 days ago
+8
About 30 seconds after there's a scalable replacement to oil.
8
Royal-Hunter38922 days ago
+46
Trump has exposed it's weakness to Iran .
Iran is going to further dominate US and push for more better deal .
US has failed to be a security provider to the gulf .
46
JaVelin-X-2 days ago
+15
trump exposed his weakness to the Houthis and now twice to Iran
15
Unlucky_Accountant712 days ago
The cope on listnook is insane. Iran is nothing but the loser here
0
SpartanKane2 days ago
+2
Iran is definitely not doing well, but lets not pretend the US isnt looking like idiots right now.
2
ItzVenoMyo2 days ago
-12
What ? Trump can just as easily say any ship that is iranian or not paying in dollars can't go through the Strait.
There is no weakness to Iran, the US could go without the c**** oil.
Iran can't go on with their leaders getting bombed every day and no money from oil sales.
-12
DEATH-BY-CIRCLEJERK2 days ago
+11
The price of a barrel of oil is set in a global futures market, it's the same price everywhere on earth...
11
ItzVenoMyo2 days ago
-7
and your point ?
THE USA can go without c**** oil is all I said lmfao.
See this is the problem, people don't even read and are talking.
-7
Seanspeed2 days ago
+13
Gas prices have decided many an election. Longer term prices hikes for oil also tend to raise prices of most goods that require any kind of transportation.
Trump and Republicans are very well aware they will get murdered in midterms if they dont keep gas prices reasonable. So yes, Iran holds plenty of leverage here.
Trump is very desperate to get out of this, but doesn't know how to clean up the mess he made, because there was clearly no plan for this ahead of time.
13
ItzVenoMyo2 days ago
+1
I was under the impression even before the war the republicans were getting murdered in the mid terms.
I am not saying the war is popular, but what I am saying is the USA can sustain a campaign much longer then Iran can last it.
They are not singing and dancing in Iran over this war. Their leaders are getting killed and they are losing billions upon billions of dollars in equipment.
1
TheRaydo2 days ago
+6
> Iran can't go on with their leaders getting bombed every day and no money from oil sales.
I’m not so optimistic. The Taliban survived for decades with both US and NATO boots on the ground hunting them. They survived and, ultimately, Trump just handed Afghanistan back to them. Now we’re trying to force a regime change in Iran without support from any allied countries and without boots on the ground? I just don’t see it happening.
It just seems like we’re backsliding here. We had a deal with Iran for no uranium enrichment, backed up with inspections, and an open strait. Now we have nothing and we have US troops dying just to try and re-establish what we already had? What a f****** fumble.
6
X-e-o2 days ago
+4
>I could burn your house.
\-Oh yeah? Well I could burn my house too so I guess we're evenly matched!
This is an absurd take. Like sure the US could threaten to blow up any ship anywhere in the world but that hardly gets them anything except unfathomable amounts of backlash.
Meanwhile Iran preventing ships from passing provides them leverage.
4
Cl1mh4224rd2 days ago
+1
>There is no weakness to Iran, the US could go without the c**** oil.
Then why does Trump keep insisting on taking oil from every country he has a problem with?
1
Preme22 days ago
-14
What weakness is that exactly?
If the US strikes Iran, Listnook is calling for war crimes.
If the Iran closes its eyes and lobs a bomb and hits anything Listnook is crying about Trump.
The US hands are tied by the stock market and daily Listnook complaining? Iran can basically do whatever they want and Listnook will justify why it’s necessary? Is this the weakness you’re referring to?
-14
Royal-Hunter38922 days ago
+11
Quoting macron " When you want to be serious you don't say every day the opposite of what you said the day before,"
"And maybe you shouldn't be speaking every day. You should just let things quieten down."
This is exactly what iam talking about Don't talks things if you keep changing your stance everyday . It's not a game .
11
Law-of-Poe2 days ago
+4
This comment is disingenuous as f***
4
Brain_Dead_Goats2 days ago
+1
Yeah, the bots are getting really obvious but also drowning out any and all discussion at this point.
1
Seanspeed2 days ago
+2
People are f****** annoyed as f*** that Trump created this mess in the first place, and now have no real plan on how to deal with it without leaving Iran in an overall strengthened position long-term.
2
Unfair_Surprise_60222 days ago
+6
Lesson to all nations : Trump's America is not an ally.
It won't help you when you need it, but it will drag you into its own fights.
Couldn't of happened to a worse regime.
6
stephencarro2 days ago
+2
I mean we all know this already.
2
Clean_Mix_55712 days ago
+2
What is the alternative? Let Iran develop keep developing their nukes and ballistic missile program and have them eventually conquer Saudi/UAE to spread their Shia regime?
2
Unfair_Surprise_60222 days ago
-3
One could try negotiating, and not take unilateral action and attack them when you are negotiating.
Secondly, perhaps don’t insult and economically attack your allies, don’t threaten to invade a fellow NATO member, don’t alienate yourself from western democracies while fawning over your autocratic buddies - Putin, KimJung Un.
That would be a start
-3
zbb932 days ago
>Lesson to all nations : ~~Trump's~~ America is not an ally.
This is nothing new. We're just saying the quiet part out loud now.
0
bassacre2 days ago
-1
Could'nt've? Couldn'tve? Couldnt've? You made a double contraction.
-1
No_Wonder47212 days ago
+1
They all do that. They group together, punch below their weight to get what they want. Again with WMDs!
1
UnderwhelmingAF2 days ago
+1
Gonna need new gas price signs with an extra digit.
1
ChatamKay2 days ago
+1
Gotta get the price of oil back up.
1
hanr862 days ago
+1
Funny stocks dont care.
1
ConcentrateDeepTrans2 days ago
+1
Gotta take out the competition. The US is now partners in the Hormuz Toll Booth.
1
Funkytowel3602 days ago
+2
Thanks israel for the price increase of oil! Broke the ceasefire a day in. israel needs to be sanctioned allready!
2
DaMongooseJooce2 days ago
-1
Can’t wait for the shit storm in the US when hurricane season hits (which is predicted to be horrible this year) and people are lined up at the pumps but there’s no gas left and can’t leave and end up dying.
-1
ChromaticDragon2 days ago
+3
Supply in the southeastern states likely won't be as much of problem as it will be elsewhere, such as most of southeast Asia for typhoon season.
Prices will be a problem, certainly. But for a globally traded commodity like gas, pricing in one place may be affected by supply in another place.
3
NappyFlickz2 days ago
-7
Folks, gonna put you on some serious game here, as someone who used to sell them:
Get you a Ford Mach E. Second best EV in the business behind Tesla, and they're dirt c**** new/depreciate like rocks after 1 year because no one buys them, due to people still being angry Ford called an EV a Mustang.
$7500 rebates on them as well.
(If you're curious as to why I don't sell em anymore: I realized I hate sales, because I have a heart.)
80 Comments