· 78 comments · Save ·
For Sale Apr 12, 2026 at 4:53 PM

Scarlett Johansson Says it Was ‘Socially Acceptable’ for Young Actresses to Be ‘Pulled Apart for How They Looked’ in the Early 2000s: ‘It Was Tough’

Posted by mcfw31


Scarlett Johansson Says It Was ‘Socially Acceptable’ for Young Actresses to Be ‘Pulled Apart for How They Looked’ in the Early 2000s: ‘It Was Tough’
Variety
Scarlett Johansson Says It Was ‘Socially Acceptable’ for Young Actresses to Be ‘Pulled Apart for How They Looked’ in the Early 2000s: ‘It Was Tough’
Scarlett Johansson says it was 'socially acceptable' for young actresses to be 'pulled apart for how they looked' in the early 2000s.

🚩 Report this post

78 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
Positive-Drawing-281 19 hr ago +190
I don't think it stopped tbh.
190
Routman 18 hr ago +39
Right, now it’s less talked about and more plastic surgery than ever
39
dburr10085 17 hr ago +11
The internet was used differently back then.
11
Hell-Diver7 14 hr ago +6
And GLP1s
6
BigMax 17 hr ago +23
It's slowed down. A little. Remember the tabloids? Constant, relentless body shaming of absolutely gorgeous women, from early ages too. That's calmed down quite a bit. Still though, obviously it hasn't gone away, as you can see from the constant cosmetic surgeries so many people get now.
23
RockItGuyDC 14 hr ago +1
I mean. I'm not really tracking it, but hasn't this just moved to "entertainment" websites and blogs, and moreso social media? Now women don't get picked apart in monthly issues, they get picked apart on the daily.
1
FastStill7962 18 hr ago +11
This tf
11
OrionsBra 9 hr ago +3
No. It's bad now. But it was so, so much worse then. Anyone who lived through that era of Perez Hilton and the height of TMZ knows how brutal they were to starlets. 
3
terrorrier 13 hr ago +1
Hasn’t stopped but it has changed. I rewatch events I remember and it is shocking how casually people would say stuff like, “Wow, she’s enormous, yuck!” about ordinary looking women (and also that’s not right to say even if they’re really big?)
1
Fragrant-Potential87 6 hr ago +1
You almost can't talk about The Last of Us show without someone coming in and saying some shit like "She didn't look like Ellie" which I read as "I didn't think she met my standards of attractiveness". Its just really gross stuff.
1
HabitantDLT 3 hr ago +1
I don't think it started in the 2000s. That shit was happening back in the silent picture days.
1
OregonMothafaquer 14 hr ago
For the most part it has. A lot of the leading young actresses wouldn’t be extras on baywatch
0
MadMaverick033 12 hr ago
It did not
0
sentencevillefonny 19 hr ago +31
Yeah that was the norm, crazy too. Remember all the Jessica Simpson stuff, etc?
31
AlarmingBranch1 14 hr ago +14
A lot of that shit was peddled and pushed by that Perez Hilton and his website, where he would circle body parts of women and making disparaging comments about them. He wasn’t the only one contributing to the problem, but boy did he fuel all that kind of talk.
14
organictamarind 7 hr ago +3
Perez Hilton was so toxic man..
3
Mayor_of_Voodoo 18 hr ago +49
Imagine the ones that *didn’t* look like Scarlett Johansson…
49
tkot2021 12 hr ago +9
I don’t think this is helping lol
9
mcfw31 19 hr ago +13
> “It was tough. There was a lot placed on how women looked,” Johansson said. “What was offered at that time for women my age, as far as acting roles or opportunities, was much slimmer than it is now.” > Johansson added that there are “much more empowering roles” for young women in 2026 than when she was “in my 20s.” When Johansson was coming up in the industry, she said it was “Slim Pickens.” > “You would get really pigeon-holed and offered the same [roles]. It would be like the other woman, or the side piece, the bombshell,” she said. “That was the archetype that was prevalent when I was that age.”
13
IanRastall 17 hr ago +14
Maybe the article was dictated to AI? It's "slim pickins".
14
xnxbcdbk 16 hr ago +8
either that or whoever dictated it had never heard that term. it’s written like it’s a guy’s name lmao. charles dickens’ rapper name
8
DazzlingCapital5230 16 hr ago +6
Slim Pickens was a famous rodeo star/actor lol
6
IanRastall 16 hr ago +4
That's what I mean. It knew about Slim Pickens, so it went for the wrong spelling. A human wouldn't think to do that.
4
DazzlingCapital5230 15 hr ago +3
Yeah! Just saying I agree and that’s where it’s likely from
3
Rabidjester 14 hr ago +2
Also the brother of H.R.
2
kidneycat 7 hr ago +1
One man came close to breaking me, H.R. Pickens. He did not succeed, for I crushed him into the ground!
1
kafka_lite 16 hr ago +7
Did the article really quote her as saying "Slim Pickens" instead of "slim pickings"? That's hilarious.
7
audreymarilynvivien 8 hr ago
She always complains about this, and while there certainly was a lack of meaningful female roles at the time, she played a part in pigeonholing herself by being a stiff actress and not showing much personality. She wasn’t very good when she stepped out of her limited range of side piece or quiet young woman. The few interesting, dramatic lead roles went to her contemporaries (Anne Hathaway, Natalie Portman, etc.) because they could give more authentic and expressive performances.
0
Broken-Sarcasm-Meter 12 hr ago +3
Crazy that an industry built on looks judges people for their looks
3
Kenesaw_Mt_Landis 11 hr ago +3
I’m just going to jump in here and say “Scarlett Johansson released an album of Tom Waits covers”
3
BusyBeeBridgette 19 hr ago +7
It's still very much a thing, sadly.
7
happyscrappy 17 hr ago +3
It was acceptable then. It's acceptable now, but it was then too. h/t Hedberg
3
zilch123 19 hr ago +12
It's a visual medium. Beautiful people will continue to be rewarded and criticized when they fall short of that. Not to sound so cold, but that's reality itself, and it will never ever change.
12
Double_Priority_2702 17 hr ago +12
Yup and she certainly benefited from it
12
rhino369 10 hr ago +4
And as an ugly person, it’s kinda lame to hear an 9.5/10 Scarjo complain that she got compared to 10/10s for an acting job. I’m a 2/10 getting dinged for jobs where it has nothing to do with looks. 
4
YaqtanBadakshani 18 hr ago +6
Yes, but for most of the history of cinema (at least in the US), it was *much* easier to get work as a less conventionally attractive actor than as a less conventionally attractive actress, and less conventionally attractive actors did receive less commentary (and harassment) over their appearance. Now, clearly *less* is not *none,* and *easier* is not *easy*. And the trend in recent years has been to tighten the beauty standards for men, while paying lip service to broader beauty standards for women (without meaningfully changing them), which, in my view, makes for a less interesting range of performances in mainstrean cinema.
6
BHATCHET 11 hr ago +1
Do you have examples over the decades for your view or is your argument just hyperbole?
1
Sumeriandawn 3 hr ago +1
What? the evidence speaks for itself
1
YaqtanBadakshani 2 hr ago +1
I can name eight or nine mainsteam actors that fall outside of what we might call Hollywood conventional attractiveness (in their acting prime) (e.g. Jonah Hill, Woody Allen, John Rhys-Davies, Billy Crystal, Stevel Buscemi, Forrest Whittaker, Timothy Spall, Toby Jones, Jonathan Pryce) Trying to think of acresses that similarly fall outside the Hollywood mold, you can find a few (Shannon Purser, Michaela Coel, Aimee Lee Wood), but they're fewer in number, tend to see less mainstream success, and tend to be more in television than in major Hollywood films.
1
LophiYesel 10 hr ago +1
Yeah; Lauren Bacall, Joan Crawford, Audrey Hepburn, and Marilyn Monroe were hideous beasts 
1
YaqtanBadakshani 2 hr ago +1
I've read this comment three times, and I'm really struggling to parse your point.
1
HammerandSickTatBro 15 hr ago +1
That is not some kind of natural law. It is an industry practice.
1
zilch123 15 hr ago
Beauty sells. This is a visual medium at the end of the day. We can say it outright, whisper it, or outright ignore it, but at the end of the day, this is how it will always be. Beautiful people have advantages in life and this is one of them. Just like smart people, strong people, or any other biological advantage.
0
HammerandSickTatBro 14 hr ago
Beauty is a social construct. Beauty standards are usually not even universal *within* a single culture, much less across many different ones. Visual media also serve a *huge* variety of purposes, for which the same adherence to a *very* narrow artificial beauty standard is actively detrimental. The homogenization of appearances in what is presented to us is neither inevitable, nor natural, nor good.
0
zilch123 14 hr ago -1
Beauty is solely a social construct? There are no evolutionary markers of health that can be perceived as beauty? I don't think the "beauty standard" is narrow, but I do think the beauty depiction can be. I disagree with the idea of a standard (are we surrounded by women who truly look the *exact* same in media). But I do think in a visual medium with the goal of generating attention, beautiful people will inevitably be cast and gain opportunities over others. This isn't just theory. The rubber has hit the road with this in reality.
-1
Hyper_nova924 6 hr ago +5
Beauty may not solely be a social construct but it plays a huge part and this is evident due to the constantly changing beauty standards in different cultures throughout history. Yes of course there is a correlation between health and beauty but it’s not that simple. Many of the beauty trends throughout time have nothing to do with health. Currently extreme skinniness has come back into fashion like the 90s, female celebs are getting skinnier and skinnier and that is not healthy at all. Women are supposed to have more body fat than men for a multitude of reasons yet when women are at a healthy weight nowadays they are seen as too big. And I’m not talking about the celebs on the extreme end that are being criticised for being too skinny such as Ariana Grande but just the average female celebs. Look at Margot Robbie, Emma stone, Anne Hathaway, Nicole Kidman etc. Also, how are cosmetic treatments such as buccal fat removal, lip filler, Botox etc. indicators of health? I’d argue that currently there is a trend of what I’d coin “sickness encoded glamour”
5
agaloch2314 17 hr ago +2
It’s also the only reason she’s famous. She certainly can’t act.
2
Sumeriandawn 3 hr ago +1
Lost in Translation Ghost World Marriage Story
1
lumsh 12 hr ago +2
Eh she did fine
2
Sinister_JaY 10 hr ago +2
Devils advocate here, if someone had a debilitating stutter or a nasty version of Tourette syndrome and they were a radio DJ, wouldn't people pick that apart? Movies and television are a visual medium. Isn't it natural to pick it apart the same way as a painting? There are good and bad works of art subjectively, dosen't that invite criticism and analysis? I agree that women and people in general shouldn't have their value assessed what they look like but if your job is to be an image for people to look at, isn't it fair game?
2
gls2220 17 hr ago +5
She did pretty well. The system worked for her, just like it's working for Zendaya and other young and beautiful actresses right now. Nothing has changed except that ScarJo has gotten older and no longer benefits from her looks the way she used to.
5
Puzzleheaded_Two7358 16 hr ago +2
I hate this attitude of well you did okay” what about the women who didnt do okay, didnt get that breakthrough role. How many women have been publicly ridiculed for how they looked, body type or something incredibly tiny that blew up. Dana Plato was a kid who got criticized by Howard Stern, she imploded. Karen Carpenter and hundreds of others. You can quote mental health but if you are prone to depression and are an actress/musician/artist and some a****** says they would like you better if you were a size smaller…. I dont think it’s much better today.
2
dontxworryxsoxmuch 16 hr ago +2
Woman who profited off of pushing those ideals has now come to tell you how bad it was as she ages, destroying the confidence of millions of young women in the process. You women don't hate these kind of people enough.
2
Krow101 18 hr ago +3
For someone who made a career on her looks ... this is pretty ironic.
3
swrrrrg 18 hr ago +3
I mean… yeah? You’re an actress/model. Of course looks matter. Not suggesting it can’t mess with your head but anyone who goes in to entertainment knows this.
3
exoriparian 18 hr ago +1
Woman who has always been hot as shit laments how tough it was to be judged by looks. More at 11. (also, it's still that way, if not more-so)
1
freakdageek 15 hr ago +4
Must have been very hard for one of the most attractive women on the planet to get through those tough times.
4
Independent-Cellist9 17 hr ago +1
Yea tell us about it
1
wooties05 15 hr ago +1
I just want watched the movie the substance, I feel like the idea is related. If you're into body horror it was pretty gnarly give it a shot but don't watch any trailers. Demi moore is still fine.
1
Ristar87 14 hr ago +1
Uh huh... Now Hollywood just uses CGI to "fix" women. Heck you can even see it in movies with Scarlett. If you watch fighting movies or superhero movies (Thor's a great example with Natalie Portman) you can see when they forget to CGI the whole body in the fighting sceness. In one of the scenes with her you can see her flexing the camera shot arm and it's super muscular while her other arm is still o natural. She looked like a parody of a guy that had been jerking it with one arm all his life.
1
blursten123 12 hr ago +1
I would like to block this entire person from all of my internet.
1
Former_Process2850 6 hr ago +1
I agree but Scarjo is constantly commendeering gender equity causes performatively to make her seem more human/relateable. She is a Woody Allen defender after all, and should absolutely not be a moral compass when it comes to gender equity.
1
Sammy_Dog 6 hr ago +1
I like Scarlett, but she's a very successful, rich and beautiful actress. Listening to her complain about how hard she had it rings hollow (she's done it multiple times over the years).
1
woodpaulusgnome 15 hr ago +1
I wish people would keep their unflattering thoughts to themselves. If you can’t say something supportive about an artist you don’t know, don’t say anything at all.
1
Monkfich 16 hr ago +1
I remember trying to find a movie to watch with my mum, when she was in town. Something like 2003 or something. I suggested we go see Johansson’s new movie at the time - The Girl With The Pearl Earring. Of course, when I actually said those words, I instead said The Girl With The Pearl Necklace. I knew I’d fucked up as soon as I had said it, but thankfully my mum was a star and didn’t realise my faux pas, or didn’t even know it was one.
1
Swamp_Dwarf-021 15 hr ago +1
And water is wet?
1
Suspicious_Safe7647 15 hr ago +1
How did they.....put em back together then. 🥁
1
Turbulent_Ad5764 14 hr ago +1
Thanks for this breaking news ScarJo
1
Slow_Ad4077 12 hr ago +1
*looks at how Erin Moriarty is being dragged thru the muck over her looks in the latest The Boys season* Doesn't seem to have changed.
1
lonelyboy5265 19 hr ago -3
She made her millions. Can say these things now comfortably
-3
luniz420 17 hr ago -3
your job is to get looked at
-3
Puzzleheaded_Two7358 16 hr ago +6
But not to be judged and belittled.
6
AppealEquivalent2582 16 hr ago
Is still hard…. The girls with lips all the actress have plum lips and let’s talk about the cheeks.
0
HammerandSickTatBro 15 hr ago
This hasn't changed.
0
NeonFraction 13 hr ago
It still is, but it was too.
0
Behemothwasagoodshot 13 hr ago
Listnook knows I watch The Boys, and honey it's gotten a LOT WORSE.
0
Audrey_Angel 9 hr ago
And full advantage taken.
0
Specialist-Web-9216 19 hr ago -10
These so called stars really have it rough in the spotlight. Critique comes hand in hand with adoration.
-10
← Back to Board