This is actually smart preventative medicine instead of just waiting for the next spillover event
52
thefugueMar 14, 2026
+2
You know what would be smarter?
Vaccinating the humans.
2
manacharMar 14, 2026
+46
Eh, two things can be true.
Eradicating disease reservoirs works wonders from new deadly things popping up.
46
thefugueMar 14, 2026
+2
Outside of *controlling* (not eliminating) malaria, when has that happened?
2
manacharMar 14, 2026
+16
Britain vaccinates chickens for salmonella so even raw egg is generally safe to eat.
16
thefugueMar 14, 2026
+3
Yeah we vaccinate the shit out of livestock, that’s most of what the WHO does.
That’s a far cry from wild and incredibly reclusive animals we don’t raise in warehouses in tiny, tiny pens.
3
pasrachilliMar 15, 2026
+7
Rabies outbreaks can be curbed by air dropping edible vaccines to stop its spread into racoon and wild canine populations.
7
SitamaMamaMar 14, 2026
+7
Vaccinating the bats prevents the viruses from mutating in the first place, because the virus can't live long enough to breed within the bats. That prevents all need for vaccinating humans. Vaccinating humans wouldn't be smarter because you'd constantly be needing to alter the vaccines to match the new mutations of the virus (see COVID) and, again, you can just cut the head off by targeting the spreaders (bats) so they never even reach humanity.
Plus bats can't say no to vaccines no matter how much fox news they watch. It's a real win/win, conceptually.
7
jpfedMar 15, 2026
+2
Most animals already know about the Murdochs and fox news but the Ellisons are bidding for control of the other animal news broadcasters.
2
Yuukiko_Mar 15, 2026
+1
Excluding ethics it's probably easier to drag those fox news watchers to get vaccinated than who knows how many bats there are. And since they're basically infecting mosquito saliva with anti bodies, might as well do humans
1
EverythingGoodWasMar 14, 2026
+4
Stupid humans have made that less of an option. Now smart humans are having to figure out ways to protect stupid humans from themselves.
4
jerrrrremyMar 14, 2026
+1
Yes, but have you met humans?
1
Fl48SpecialMar 16, 2026
+1
No. Vaccinating the mosquitoes
1
thefugueMar 16, 2026
...you can just kill mosquitoes.
0
ThousandtreeMar 15, 2026
+12
> The strategy works by delivering vaccines to bats without capturing or injecting them individually. In the experiments, scientists used mosquitoes to carry weakened or modified vaccine viruses. The insects were first fed blood containing the vaccine.
> Once inside the mosquito, the vaccine virus replicated and moved to the insect’s salivary glands. When the mosquito bit an animal or when bats consumed infected insects, the vaccine could be transferred, triggering the animal’s immune system to produce protective antibodies.
So they're using vaccinated people blood to vaccinate the mosquitoes to vaccinate the bats so they don't have to vaccinate people?
12
No-Impression891Mar 15, 2026
+2
I wonder if this means it won’t work with the rabies vaccine, since that uses a killed virus. If they could figure out a way to do that, that would be amazing, since bats are a major rabies vector species.
2
ThousandtreeMar 15, 2026
+3
It sounds like the rabies vaccine was one of the ones that possibly worked.
> Animals exposed to vaccine-carrying mosquitoes developed neutralising antibodies against rabies, indicating that their immune systems had learned to recognise and fight the virus. When these animals were later exposed to rabies infection, they survived, suggesting that the vaccine had successfully triggered protective immunity.
3
No-Impression891Mar 15, 2026
+2
Darn, I wish I could order some of those mosquitos to feed the bats that insist on living in our eaves.
2
RajirabbitMar 15, 2026
+5
It’s too bad Joker.. you see I have my Bat-Vaccination so your virus didn’t affect me.
5
LorderNileMar 14, 2026
+14
Scientists are so desperate to help people, they'll vaccinate bats instead. So the antivaxxers don't get in the way.
14
blogomanMar 14, 2026
+6
Great, now we are going to deal with bautism.
6
jerrrrremyMar 14, 2026
+4
But why is Bill Gates putting microchips into bats?
4
ZardotabMar 17, 2026
+1
*Nooooo!* Don't! Touch! Bats!
Dincha learn from Jiiiihna?
1
Ultra_FilthMar 19, 2026
+1
I hate it when there is an outbreak of humans
1
Geoff_DawmerMar 14, 2026
+1
But that will cause Wifi 7 in the bats.
1
lookitsafishMar 15, 2026
Feels like the start of a zombie movie
0
wanderingpeddlarMar 15, 2026
-2
Ok so this has neat written all over it.
Until.... yeah there is always a but.
Covid came out of the blue. We had no idea what the hell it was raising hell in China.
They had to hunt it down old school. And then the wait for a vaccine started. By the time we had a vaccine bats were no longer part of the problem. Their work was done.
Once you have sustained human to human transmission going where it came from it besides the point.
And lastly spill over was studied in China. They have some massive bat colonies and a multinational group of scientists studied the people that live near them. They found lots of evidence of spill over in the human populations. Not one or two cases but lots. They estimated most of the spill over events are not contagious enough to start a spread and guessed the residents figured they had the flu and just went on with life.
The scientists also pointed out when they were studying the actual bat colonies they found evidence that in spite of restrictions from the government people were going into the bat caves in hot weather. Beer bottles and water bottles and other trash scattered on the floor of the caves. And this activity would increase the rate of spill over events.
TLDR
If we don't know about the virus ahead of time this can't work.
Covid came at us out of the blue.
But the concept could work wonders for yearly outbreaks.
29 Comments