· 183 comments · Save ·
General Mar 27, 2026 at 3:41 PM

Secret Service agent assigned to Jill Biden accidentally shoots himself in leg at airport

Posted by boxofstuff


Secret Service agent assigned to Jill Biden accidentally shoots himself in leg at airport
AP News
Secret Service agent assigned to Jill Biden accidentally shoots himself in leg at airport
Authorities say a U.S. Secret Service agent assigned to protect former first lady Jill Biden accidentally shot himself in the leg at Philadelphia International Airport.

🚩 Report this post

183 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
chef-nom-nom Mar 27, 2026 +2417
"We have top men working on it right now." "Who?" "Top… men."
2417
Luna_Mistwalker Mar 27, 2026 +329
Men who are Tops.
329
sirferrell Mar 27, 2026 +118
No bottoms
118
Sweaty_Assignment_90 Mar 27, 2026 +49
Until the gop convention....then nothing is off limits. At least according to grinder press releases.
49
Party_Promotion_8805 Mar 27, 2026 +3
They’re at least power bottoms, right?
3
ElectronicFerret Mar 27, 2026 +37
pretty sure there are zero of those in this administration tbh
37
twec21 Mar 27, 2026 +5
The bottoms are the smarter ones anyway
5
SpitefulSeagull Mar 27, 2026 +23
Thanks, Porkins
23
JamesTwoTimes Mar 27, 2026 +8
Also played Detective Eckhart in batman 1989
8
Snakegert Mar 27, 2026 +5
Holy shit, never connected those three characters before but that’s a cool fun fact!
5
Rocky_Mountain_Way Mar 27, 2026 +3
Red Six standing by
3
Dan_Berg Mar 27, 2026 +4
Fools. Damn beauracratic fools.
4
Sure-Database-9952 Mar 27, 2026 +5
Is this a Peter Griffin quote? I feel like I’ve heard this on family guy
5
onarainyafternoon Mar 27, 2026 +17
Yes but Family Guy was parodying a line from the ending of one of the Indiana Jones movies.
17
Sure-Database-9952 Mar 27, 2026 +2
Oh yeah I haven’t seen any of those, that makes sense then. Thanks
2
CharcoalGreyWolf Mar 28, 2026 +8
You should. They’re good. The first three, at any rate.
8
Jediverrilli Mar 28, 2026 +3
To piggyback off of this you can actually skip Temple of Doom, that movie is not good and is a tough watch now. Kate Capshaw is doing her best trying to act terribly. Raiders and the Last Crusade are good. Raiders is actual fantastic film while Last Crusade is more campy but still a ton of fun.
3
chef-nom-nom Mar 27, 2026 +3
I was quoting a bit from an Indiana Jones movie but Family Guy might have done a twist on it too.
3
[deleted] Mar 27, 2026 +371
[removed]
371
smurfsundermybed Mar 27, 2026 +46
Nah. Its Plaxico Burress just doing him.
46
swingadmin Mar 27, 2026 +9
"Protect the first lady!" Where's the threat? "Oh it's just Bob."
9
ry1701 Mar 27, 2026 +146
Was the line too long?
146
Otagian Mar 27, 2026 +670
I didn't know the secret Service used Sig Sauer P320s.
670
aaronhayes26 Mar 27, 2026 +409
Love that basically every cop in America has been issued the gun that just kinda goes off by itself sometimes
409
Brilliant_Cricket165 Mar 27, 2026 +145
I thought most use Glock
145
PM-ME-YOUR-BUTTSHOLE Mar 27, 2026 +110
They absolutely do, but since US Army adopted the military versions as the M17/M18, some police departments started adopting them as well. To my knowledge though, many police departments allow quite a bit of personal choice when it comes to sidearms. I have a cop friend, he said it varies from department to department but at his current department he’s allowed to carry just about any sidearm as long as he’s qualified with it at the range and it doesn’t go against any of their policies (no special modifications like extended mags, dot sights, etc).
110
spinnyround Mar 27, 2026 +67
If I see a cop with a f****** Taurus I don’t know if I could take them seriously 
67
BigSchmikey Mar 27, 2026 +17
Imagine one carrying a hi point in hunnid dollar camo 😂
17
nuked24 Mar 28, 2026 +5
Respect the Yeet Cannon!
5
bacon205 Mar 28, 2026 +3
I swear to god if a cop pulls his milk cow print Glock on me, I'll drop my weapon in laughter.
3
Bob_Juan_Santos Mar 27, 2026 +12
their revolver are fine for the most part.
12
YimmyGhey Mar 27, 2026 +10
I do love the Judge. Sure it's a bit of a novelty firearm but the thing's a damn hand cannon
10
Entry-Level-Cowboy Mar 27, 2026 +5
And the tx22
5
3-DMan Mar 27, 2026 +5
Hey what's wrong with the Ford Taurus?!
5
Assassingod92 Mar 27, 2026 +6
It has a internal engine water pump that costs a lot to replace when it goes
6
hedoeswhathewants Mar 28, 2026 +2
They also stopped making it 7 years ago so problem solved
2
KingMRano Mar 27, 2026 +6
I had a cop friend tell me to buy a Taurus PT111. Just like him that gun was the biggest pile of shit I have ever shot. It would jam every other round without fail, the sights would shift after 1 mag, and when I got it I had to spend a few hours cleaning the oil out of it just so I could hold it. I will never buy a Taurus ever again.
6
zakabog Mar 28, 2026 +3
> Just like him that gun was the biggest pile of shit I have ever shot. Did you shoot them after the recommendation, or was it just an unrelated incident?
3
Xytak Mar 27, 2026 +11
No dot sights? It’s 2026, reflex sights are common, reliable, and recommend by most firearm instructors. Did his department include any reason for forbidding them when many departments are making them standard issue? Also, extended magazines aren’t really a “firearm modification” they’re literally just… inserting a bigger magazine.
11
KingMRano Mar 27, 2026 +19
The issue is that most 2 or 3 point holsters don't fit sights properly. And cops are required to have holsters that prevent them from getting disarmed in a scrum.
19
Xytak Mar 27, 2026 +11
Safariland (which is what most departments use) absolutely makes optics-ready Level III retention holsters.
11
PM-ME-YOUR-BUTTSHOLE Mar 27, 2026 +9
He said the reasoning is mostly to do with appearances, they don’t want their officers looking militarized.
9
ClaudeGascoigne Mar 27, 2026 +8
>No dot sights? It’s 2026, reflex sights are common, reliable, and recommend by most firearm instructors. They're not trained to *actually* aim their sidearms. They just magdump towards a target and if enough hit they're "qualified" with the weapon.
8
snorp Mar 27, 2026 +3
Still, easier to mag dump with a dot
3
AdeptFelix Mar 28, 2026 +3
Dunno, I can mag dump with my eyes closed.
3
Happy_Blizzard Mar 27, 2026 +10
Its the money. Departments get crazy deals that outcompete glock, and since sig was accepted by the military they can look past the reputation to pinch some pennies. (By pennies i mean potentially a shitload of money)
10
ActionQuinn Mar 27, 2026 +10
When i was in the Air Force in 2001 everyone had a Beretta 9mm on deployment.
10
Brilliant_Cricket165 Mar 27, 2026 +14
Yea that was the standard military sidearm
14
Firm-Breakfast-6045 Mar 27, 2026 +29
They do use glocks, this guy is talking out his ass
29
radiorabbit Mar 27, 2026 +22
Depends on the unit. I’ve seen local LEOs carrying sigs or glocks.
22
VegasRoomEscape Mar 27, 2026 +4
Both are extremely common. Maybe slightly off to say that 2nd place is 1st place but definitely not "talking out his ass."
4
SomeDEGuy Mar 27, 2026 +24
The first runs definitely had issues with their drop safety, which was confirmed in multiple tests. That issue has been addressed. Other issues have been alleged, but haven't been able to be duplicated. A likely explanation is police switching to a striker fired gun without an external safety and making mistakes, but we don't know for sure. Remember, NYC used to require an extremely heavy trigger pull for its police weapons to prevent officers from accidently firing them.
24
TaterTotJim Mar 27, 2026 +11
Good luck brother I get dogpiled over the same facts. Put a no-safety firearm on an overloaded duty belt in holsters that don’t always guard the trigger. One loose radio antenna and it’s kabloowie.
11
Xytak Mar 28, 2026 +2
Honestly this is why I won’t buy a gun without a manual safety anymore. Yes I know, people say it’s not necessary… but psychologically I just don’t like the idea of a chambered firearm that close to my junk without an extra precaution. It takes no time at all to flick the safety off as part of a draw, and it’s worth it for my peace of mind.
2
beer_engineer_42 Mar 27, 2026 +5
Yeah, "Glock leg" was a thing for *years* (and might still be, for all I know). Basically, if your finger is on the trigger while you're reholstering your glock/sig/other striker fired gun without an external safety, the side of the holster can push on your finger, resulting in you shooting yourself in the ass/leg.
5
Spire_Citron Mar 28, 2026 +3
Having your finger on the trigger while you're trying to holster your weapon seems exceptionally stupid.
3
stana32 Mar 27, 2026 +49
Which, AFAIK, SIG still says doesn't happen despite the myriad of videos showing exactly how it happens
49
MZM204 Mar 27, 2026 +53
SIG's response to this whole thing has been nothing short of outrageous. It's one thing to have a manufacturing or design issue. It happens. But to deny it for years is ridiculous. They should be banned from any government contracts over it.
53
ProlapseMishap Mar 27, 2026 +16
>They should be banned from any government contracts over it. "Best we could do was issue them all of the infantry small arms contracts for rifles and medium machine guns. That'll teach em." - US Government
16
BrainWav Mar 27, 2026 +6
Sig's repsonse is a great way to draw more attention to it, but I do think it's overblown and most of the UDs are actually people f****** up putting it in a holster. Regardless, there does appear to be *something*, but it's clearly not affecting the entire line or we'd hear even more that are definitively not user error. I've put thousands of rounds through my P320, plenty of holster drills, and all that and nothing. I don't blame anyone that doesn't trust the gun though. Hell, even though I think mine's fine, I stopped using it regularly for competition and switched to a Beretta.
6
CiaphasCain8849 Mar 27, 2026 +4
Because no one can recreate it without putting stuff holding the trigger down? Not one person recreating the problem does it without putting a screw or something into the trigger.
4
Nickmorgan19457 Mar 27, 2026 +11
It’s all…part of the plan
11
e_muaddib Mar 27, 2026 +10
Any actual reports saying it was a P320? Would be crazy if so. So many reports of that thing going off without any manipulation.
10
treedemolisher Mar 27, 2026 +33
My exact thoughts. These guns are prone to spontaneously fire. Insane how they haven’t been massively recalled across the board…
33
No_Construction2407 Mar 27, 2026 +16
I feel like the recall explanation from Fight Club is massively relevant here.
16
treedemolisher Mar 27, 2026 +3
With Sig’s involvement with entities inside the US government, it’s almost certainly a half assed cover up at this point. So much money being poured into these defective guns via tax dollars; it’s not just embarrassing for the manufacturer, but also embarrassing for the government. I do think that the fact that the exact cause is yet to be determined gives Sig some temporary legal protection. You can’t properly sue for negligence if you can’t even determine how exactly it malfunctions. It’s like trying to convict someone for murder but you can’t determine how the other person was killed. Tricky situation but these guns CLEARLY and REPEATABLY demonstrate the same problem and should be recalled…
3
sofbert Mar 27, 2026 +4
Gotta apply the formula.
4
DeaconPat Mar 27, 2026 +6
They don't, at least not as standard issue. Standard issue is a Glock.
6
no_one_likes_u Mar 27, 2026 +914
There goes another lifetime disability pension at about 150k a year from the taxpayers.
914
Observe_Report_ Mar 27, 2026 +153
I seriously laughed out loud when I read this. Do you know what kind of shit this dude is going to get from his coworkers now?
153
TheBatemanFlex Mar 27, 2026 +97
What coworkers? Ain’t no way you stay on SS after this.
97
Observe_Report_ Mar 27, 2026 +27
Do you think they get fired because of this?
27
spudmarsupial Mar 27, 2026 +38
He got fired at.
38
armywalrus Mar 27, 2026 +25
Yes. Yes they do.
25
Rickshmitt Mar 27, 2026 +8
Id imagine the first step in training is you dont shoot yourself. If you do, youre fired and highly regarded
8
AngriestPacifist Mar 27, 2026 +4
Honestly, a short prison sentence might be warranted as well. People die from negligent discharges, they're not just an "oops, my bad"
4
petty_brief Mar 28, 2026 +4
Normal people get charged for stuff like this. Law enforcement, highly doubt it.
4
shifty1032231 Mar 27, 2026 +12
*former* coworkers
12
ParameciaAntic Mar 27, 2026 +10
Yeah, pretty this was just sad. Although, maybe it's a little better than that FBI agent who shot someone while doing flips and dancing at a club. EDIT: [link](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xERtd2EYI1c)
10
Observe_Report_ Mar 27, 2026 +8
Doing back flips while drunk, then add carrying a hot gun. Then he puts up his hands like a soccer player after committing a foul, as if the gun that just went off had nothing to do with him.
8
CronoDroid Mar 28, 2026 +3
This is my safety sir. Although if it was a Glock they're usually carried with a round in the chamber, the tool decided to pick it up with his finger in the trigger guard evidently.
3
Observe_Report_ Mar 28, 2026 +2
Yep, you can throw those types of guns against the wall and they won’t go off. This moron put his finger on the trigger.
2
phoolvapingfool Mar 27, 2026 +5
What coworkers?
5
ConfusedNTerrified Mar 27, 2026 +78
I used to be a secret agent like you But then i took a bullet to the knee
78
MithrilHuman Mar 27, 2026 +72
I had to double check if this was the Onion
72
Klightgrove Mar 27, 2026 +6
This wouldn’t have happened if Major Biden was on duty.
6
oGsBathSalts Mar 27, 2026 +41
Ah so that's what Plaxico Burress is up to these days
41
BuiltForLegacy Mar 27, 2026 +5
Elite ball knowledge. Came to make the same joke
5
yhwhx Mar 27, 2026 +285
Hey, AP: The word you want isn't "accidentally". It's "negligently". __ *edited to fix typo: "your" -> "you"
285
bsport48 Mar 27, 2026 +125
Technically, negligence is also a legal conclusion, so a proper news outfit *would* wait until a trial (or even admin against the agent) before using that particular word. The AP's still not out of the doghouse for uncovering Banksy, however. They are in *deep* f****** doo-doo for such an egregious violation of public and social trust. After all, they *are* a proper news outlet.
125
Dswim Mar 27, 2026 +71
I think OP is alluding to the trope in gun culture that there are no “accidental” gun discharges, only negligence. One has to violate more than one of the 4 rules of gun safety in order to result in injury
71
drewts86 Mar 27, 2026 +22
Generally yes, accidental discharges are not a thing. There are exceptions to that. Sig allegedly has some trigger issues with one of their guns a couple years ago. Remington also had something similar problems with the Model 700 around 2010.
22
Infinite_Click_6589 Mar 27, 2026 +17
Unless I'm thinking of yet another pistol that fires on its own, allegedly here means "consistently reproducible on YouTube"
17
armywalrus Mar 27, 2026 +5
You cannot be serious. A known trigger issue means stop use of the weapon. Negligence.
5
drewts86 Mar 27, 2026 +4
The problem is there were accidental discharges before it came to be "known". Like sure, it's easy in hindsight to say that it was known, but it wasn't known at the time of the initial occurrences.
4
iconmotocbr Mar 27, 2026 +2
Except if you have a sig. those just goes off by breathing on it
2
trynared Mar 27, 2026 +14
Lol it's been pretty well known that he's Gunningham since like 2008.
14
sudoku7 Mar 27, 2026 +11
If you read the article, they refer to as a negligent discharge. At least in quotes, likely referencing how the Secret Service has been talking about it.
11
DocAuch Mar 27, 2026 +9
AP didn’t out Banksy. That was Reuters. 
9
iamarealperson12345 Mar 27, 2026 +25
That was Reuters not the AP
25
datsoar Mar 27, 2026 +12
>>The word your want Correcting the AP with a typo is pretty funny
12
GuinnessGlutton Mar 27, 2026 +7
If you read the story, it's called a ND.
7
jsar16 Mar 27, 2026 +16
Sig has claimed another one.
16
PlanXerox Mar 27, 2026 +12
Sig P-320 no doubt🤣🤪😜😛...in my opinion.
12
BoosterRead78 Mar 27, 2026 +6
And why all USSS should have been fired after January 6th.
6
cannabiscowgirl Mar 27, 2026 +5
carrying a sig I'd bet
5
MothMatron Mar 27, 2026 +4
Underrated comment
4
No_Mathematician764 Mar 27, 2026 +19
anyone taking bets on if the pistol was a sig saure 320 or not?
19
EatYourTrees Mar 27, 2026 +9
I'd bet my life savings it wasn't a Sig Saure. Could have been a Sig Suaer, though.
9
viper_in_the_grass Mar 28, 2026 +6
Maybe even a Sig Sauer.
6
FrenchDipFellatio Mar 27, 2026 +11
"only police and military need guns, the average citizen isn't qualified to use them properly" Formally trained government agents:
11
kidcrumb Mar 27, 2026 +5
Cheddar Bob assigned to the security detail
5
SnuffleWarrior Mar 27, 2026 +6
Maybe he can be assigned to Trump
6
funroll-loops Mar 27, 2026 +5
[I'm the only one in this room professional enough, that I know of, to carry this Glock 40.](https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=q8PzUD67JO0)
5
jgilbs Mar 27, 2026 +24
Was he carrying a P320?
24
-UserOfNames Mar 27, 2026 +30
You know the execs at Sig scheduled at least 1 emergency meeting to discuss that exact question
30
mr_potatoface Mar 27, 2026 +12
I was going to say they probably don't even care any more. But then I realized their website has pages dedicated to "truth media" that say it's impossible for it to fire without a trigger pull, and every instance of an accidental discharge has been a result of the operator. >https://www.sigsauer.com/p320-truth-media >https://www.sigsauer.com/p320-truth
12
Gekokapowco Mar 27, 2026 +9
that basically confirms it's a massive issue, only the guilty would need to whine this much
9
The_RealAnim8me2 Mar 27, 2026 +4
My immediate thought.
4
baseketball Mar 27, 2026 +4
The agent shot himself in the leg, not the former first lady.
4
TheHumanCompulsion Mar 27, 2026 +4
"You little scum, you. Shooting yourself in the leg? You ought to be shot for that." - Frank Burns, M*A*S*H*
4
Flat-Complaint-5131 Mar 27, 2026 +3
Hope there's vid of it 😆
3
Nanojack Mar 27, 2026 +4
I knew Charles Tillman became an FBI agent, but I wasn't aware Plaxico Burress went to the Secret Service
4
Malvania Mar 27, 2026 +3
They're not sending their best.
3
Big_Lab_Jagr Mar 27, 2026 +8
I'm surprised Trump hasn't taken away her SS protection
8
Rough_Idle Mar 27, 2026 +11
The fact she still had a Secret Service detail probably pissed him off when he heard the news
11
coldfoamer Mar 27, 2026 +7
Rule number one says keep your booger hook off the bang switch until you have a target in sight and are ready to fire. I’m just a civilian, but I think they teach this to law-enforcement.
7
beams13 Mar 27, 2026 +2
That's actually #3 of the 4 firearm safety rules (at least from CG basic training).
2
coldfoamer Mar 27, 2026 +3
1. All guns are loaded, until you verify they are not. 2. Keep the barrel pointed down range, in a safe direction. 3. Keeper your finger off the trigger until you have a target in sight, and are ready to fire. 4. Know what's around and beyond your target before firing. I was making a silly joke :)
3
itcheyness Mar 27, 2026 +6
Isn't there currently a pistol in service where the company (Sig Sauer I believe) refuses to admit that they randomly go off sometimes? Could this have been one of those guns?
6
SamuelYosemite Mar 27, 2026 +3
It’s ignorant of us to assume a badge and years of training equals competence.
3
hawkwings Mar 27, 2026 +3
This plays into the debate of whether or not you should have a bullet in the chamber.
3
SqueakyTuna52 Mar 27, 2026 +3
What kind of idiots do you have working here???
3
Alternative_Rate7474 Mar 27, 2026 +3
wait--didn't dumbass throw a tantrum and rescind all the previous presidents' secret service details? I assume that would include family?
3
Users_Name00 Mar 27, 2026 +3
Was he issued a sig p320?
3
invalidpassword Mar 27, 2026 +16
I'm surprised Trump still lets her have a security detail. My guess is he wouldn't if he could get away with it.
16
astrofed Mar 27, 2026 +15
My guess is he assigned the bottom of the barrel secret service agent to her.
15
_Darren Mar 27, 2026 +5
To be fair, even without trump they would probably do it on a risk based approach and she must be quite low down on the risk threshold. 
5
purestevil Mar 27, 2026 +4
Bottom of the barrel talent is candidate for top position in this administration.
4
NKD_WA Mar 27, 2026 +7
Was he using a modified trigger or a defective gun? I don't know how your gun just goes off while you're driving.
7
Slippery-ape Mar 27, 2026 +33
Sig p320 would like to say something..
33
ForcedEntry420 Mar 27, 2026 +2
The only way this happens is via incompetence.
2
s2the9sublime Mar 27, 2026 +2
Seems he got a little excited around the ex-first lady. Interesting kink my guy
2
halfbreedmofo Mar 27, 2026 +2
That man’s name Plaxico Burress.
2
WealthySteps Mar 27, 2026 +2
I guess he was just checking, shot is painful or not.
2
Mysterious_Cow_2100 Mar 27, 2026 +2
He had probably just looked down the barrel to make sure it was loaded, then he went to holster it and the gun just went off!!
2
woleykram Mar 27, 2026 +2
If only there was a good guy with a gun.
2
shoulda-known-better Mar 27, 2026 +2
I just uncontrollably giggled at this headline..... I hope he is okay but shooting ones self is hilarious especially for a secret service member
2
jpiro Mar 27, 2026 +2
Found what Plaxico Burress has been doing since his NFL days.
2
blind99 Mar 27, 2026 +2
Lol, I don't think Trump & Patel assigned the best minds to protect anyone related to Biden.
2
AlpineAvalanche Mar 27, 2026 +2
Why is an ICE agent in the secret service? Or maybe he's a NY Giants WR, either way not qualified for that position.
2
blahyawnblah Mar 27, 2026 +2
Was he carrying a P320?
2
multificionado Mar 27, 2026 +2
And here I thought he was shooting an assailant...but himself?
2
DrebinofPoliceSquad Mar 27, 2026 +2
My grandfather's revolver!
2
fiendishrabbit Mar 27, 2026 +15
And people call me crazy when I don't trust people who carry with one in the chamber. Sure, agents who protect the wife of a former president are perhaps not the A+ tier Secret service agents, but they are still much stricter about training and selection than your average police department or wannabe good-guy-with-a-gun.
15
SomeDEGuy Mar 27, 2026 +7
My completely wild guess would be a mistake holstering, and something got caught up in the trigger. It's a common cause of accidental leg shots.
7
Th3_Admiral_ Mar 27, 2026 +10
It doesn't matter if they are the A+ tier Secret Service agent, the Secret Service as a whole is supposed to be the A+ tier agency. So even if they are the worst of the best, they are still supposed to be better than most. Of course, that theory has been routinely disproven by all sorts of scandals and blunders with the agency, to the point where they really don't feel like some elite force anymore. 
10
Red-Dwarf69 Mar 27, 2026 +28
Carrying with a loaded chamber isn’t the problem. Violating the rules of gun safety is the problem. If the trigger stays protected and untouched, then the gun doesn’t fire. Simple as that. Unless it’s a P320. Carrying with an empty chamber is like driving without a seatbelt and thinking you’ll have time to buckle up before a crash.
28
Sea_Perspective6891 Mar 27, 2026 +5
Yeah. Don't most modern 9mm handguns have a kind of auto or always on safety where it only deactivates when you pull the trigger with your finger with a certain amount of pressure? I know Glocks have this feature.
5
fiendishrabbit Mar 27, 2026 +6
They do, except they don't. They have a safety that deactivates when the trigger is pulled, but it doesn't care if what pulls the trigger is your finger or not.
6
Dimatrix Mar 27, 2026 +5
Trigger safeties are designed to be paired with a holster that covers the entire trigger guard. Outside of p320, guns accidentally firing in a holster is basically a nonexistent issue
5
wyvernx02 Mar 27, 2026 +2
Revolvers are exactly the same in that regard.
2
Kolby_Jack33 Mar 27, 2026 -1
How many quick draw scenarios do you think people run into? If chambering a round is the difference between life and death, buddy, you were dead no matter what.
-1
beenoc Mar 27, 2026 +3
I mean, in this case we're talking about a Secret Service agent assigned as bodyguard to a First Lady to a former president who is violently hated by hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of armed, mentally unstable people. If I had to put together a list of "people in the US who are most likely to need a bodyguard to quick-draw to save their life," Jill Biden would probably be top 10 or 20.
3
SpudsBuckley223 Mar 27, 2026 +8
Check out active self protection on YouTube. He has a number of videos on real situations that address the debate of carrying with one chambered or not. There are plenty of instances when having a round good to go absolutely was the difference between life and death, and the good guys were able to defend themselves and walk away. Of course everyone should only carry how they're comfortable and how they train, and don't carry a p320.
8
kkpc Mar 27, 2026 +6
The article says, "accidentally discharged his gun shortly before 9 a.m." This should be re-written to, "negligently discharged...".
6
Coriolanuscangetit Mar 27, 2026 +2
Everybody does a desk pop, right? This one just happened to hit his leg
2
Devolutionator Mar 27, 2026 +2
I didn't know Plaxico Burress was a secret service agent.
2
Well_Spoken_Mute Mar 27, 2026 +5
You can't make this shit up
5
FairieswithBoots Mar 27, 2026 +3
You can make this shit up
3
avds_wisp_tech Mar 27, 2026 +5
The best and brightest.
5
10061993 Mar 27, 2026 +3
He heard they raised the drafting age
3
Stiklikegiant Mar 27, 2026 +3
Serious question here, how likely is firing your gun accidentally? If you are an experienced secret service agent is this something that can happen commonly? Is this just negligence or can this happen and not be the fault of the officer?
3
Nicholas-Steel Mar 27, 2026 +6
There's a Sig branded gun used by I think American military and some police forces that's now pretty well established as being able to fire uncommanded shots.
6
EchoMB Mar 27, 2026 +3
PLEEEASE BE A 320 that would be the funniest part of this
3
chambo143 Mar 27, 2026 +3
He should have looked down the barrel first to see if it was loaded
3
imconsideringdascrod Mar 27, 2026 +2
So that’s what Plaxico is up to, huh?
2
mkp666 Mar 27, 2026 +2
Are ICE agents moonlighting as secret service now too?
2
Dieter_Knutsen Mar 27, 2026 +2
So the weapon's mechanical components spontaneously failed and it discharged a round? That's an accident. If not, it was a *negligent* discharge.
2
Sea_Quiet_9612 Mar 27, 2026 +1
Les Russes vont encore bien rigoler
1
homelesguydiet Mar 27, 2026 +1
Thank goodness it wasn't intentional
1
Jsmith0730 Mar 27, 2026 +1
One of the previous mayors in my city did that (in the foot IIRC). Everyone knew he did it and he still ran and won on the claim that he was shot in the line of duty.
1
edingerc Mar 27, 2026 +1
This is a lie!  The only Police who are authorized to shoot themselves in the leg are firearm safety instructors!
1
← Back to Board