· 38 comments · Save ·
For Sale Mar 24, 2026 at 3:00 AM

Senate GOP says Trump signals shift to backing DHS compromise with Democrats

Posted by kootles10


https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5797166-trump-homeland-security-funding-deal

🚩 Report this post

38 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
Showmethepathplease Mar 24, 2026 +1
It is Tuesday, after all 
1
ChopperChange Mar 24, 2026 +1
So basically: TACO
1
Miserable_Pie_8337 Mar 24, 2026 +1
The Orange Moron realized that he'd be blamed for the airport chaos, so he TACOed as usual...
1
KilroyLeges Mar 24, 2026 +1
He also has a crush on Katie Britt’s late grandmother, so sending her to ask the s sane question got a better answer.
1
KingMario05 Mar 24, 2026 +1
See, Schumer and Jeffries? Standing up to the bully *does* work! Please, more of it.
1
blazesquall Mar 24, 2026 +1
Even if they get everything they asked for, it doesn't remotely address underlying issues.. 
1
GoodIdea321 Mar 24, 2026 +1
True, but they need control of congress and potentially the presidency to even address underlying issues. A small win is something.
1
SummerSun75 Mar 24, 2026 +1
No, no!! Back to the nice, polite, well-reasoned arguments. And we'll have our consultants hold a Focus group. That'll do it! As a corporate Democrat, I don't want to ruffle any feathers or offend anyone.
1
KingMario05 Mar 24, 2026 +1
Cool! As a non-corporate Democrat? Here's your replacement, we primaried your ass due to your own inaction. Please get the f*** out of *their* office.
1
Western-Classic-2494 Mar 24, 2026 +1
Of course he is. He needs the government to actually function if he wins.
1
DisMFer Mar 24, 2026 +1
The problem with this is that Trump could agree at 4 pm and by 5 be telling them to fight to the bitter end.
1
GlobalistCabal Mar 24, 2026 +1
Wait….Dems are getting what they demanded? Is this *hope* that I feel or merely the foolishness of Charlie Brown before Lucy yanks the football yet again?
1
nkassis Mar 24, 2026 +1
I want to hope but I fear they will agree to a compromise that fully funds ICE and dilutes their demands for changes.
1
headbangershappyhour Mar 24, 2026 +1
Ice is already funded from the bullshit bill.
1
TheHandsOfLiberation Mar 24, 2026 +1
The budget was set, but the funding itself is not all provided up front. Government programs often get paid for in installments and can run out of "funding" despite a budget that agrees to a larger annual amount. In this case, trumps giant shit bill stated ICE would receive a certain amount per year, but the agency can still run out of money when the next payment from the federal government does not arrive. They can be bled dry.
1
KingMario05 Mar 24, 2026 +1
Same, bro.  Keep your eyes and ears ready.
1
fishrcool Mar 24, 2026 +1
Don't worry, there is still plenty of time for Schumer and Jeffries to give up all their leverage in exchange for some pinky promises!
1
kootles10 Mar 24, 2026 +1
From the article: Senate Republicans believe that President Trump is willing to accept a potential deal to fund the Department of Homeland Security following a White House meeting on Monday night. It would be a significant shift for Trump, who over the weekend repeatedly he would not make a deal with Democrats unless they moved separate voting legislation known as the SAVE America Act. A Senate Republican source familiar with the discussion said Trump is willing to separate funding for the Enforcement and Removal Operation from the Homeland Security appropriations bill in order to get enough Democratic support it. Under the proposal presented to Trump, Senate Republicans would pass additional money for ICE’s removal operations under the budget reconciliation process, which allows them to circumvent a Democratic filibuster in the Senate as long as the legislation being considered meets certain requirements related to the spending, taxation or deficit reduction. Senate Republicans told Trump that they would also attempt to pass elements of the SAVE America Act, which Trump has called his No. 1 legislative priority, in the follow-up reconciliation bill.
1
Specialist-Day6721 Mar 24, 2026 +1
" attempt to pass elements of the SAVE America Act, which Trump has called his No. 1 legislative priority, in the follow-up reconciliation bill." I don't see how they will pass SAVE Act under reconciliation. It's not a spending bill. I thought only spending Bills could be used under reconciliation and I also thought reconciliation could only be used once per year?
1
daly1010 Mar 24, 2026 +1
You are correct. They probably just sold him some bullshit to get the dhs funding over.
1
KingMario05 Mar 24, 2026 +1
> I don't see how they will pass SAVE Act under reconciliation.  That's the fun part. They won't!
1
Specialist-Day6721 Mar 24, 2026 +1
I hope your right.
1
KingMario05 Mar 24, 2026 +1
I hope so too.
1
brain_overclocked Mar 24, 2026 +1
Sen. John Kennedy's idea is to play loose with definitions and terms, and try to argue before the parliamentarian: >Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, had suggested earlier this month trying to pass the SAVE America Act under budget reconciliation to avoid a Democratic filibuster but some Republicans had raised serious doubts about doing so because many of the reforms in the bill are policy-related and not chiefly of a budgetary nature. >“To me, the easiest way to get the SAVE Act passed, the most efficient way, is to try to do it through reconciliation,” Kennedy said on March 9. >“And I know some people say you can’t possibly survive a Byrd Bath,” he added, referring to the procedural test for passing legislation under the budget reconciliation process. “I’ve seen things survive a Byrd Bath that I thought had no chance. … We’ve got some clever wordsmiths. You don’t know what’s gonna survive a Byrd Bath until you can argue your case in front of the parliamentarian.” However, other Republicans are not swayed yet: >Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), a leading proponent of passing the SAVE America Act, said earlier this month that it was not drafted with the intention of passing it under budget reconciliation. >“The way it’s written, it’s nowhere near something that can be done through reconciliation. If John Kennedy or anybody else is aware of a means by which we can do it through reconciliation, obviously I’d love to review that. The bill is not written as a reconciliation bill,” Lee said at the time. >Thune also poured water on the idea of passing the SAVE America Act through budget reconciliation on March 10. >“We’ve looked at that. That’s also very, very difficult. I mean we have tried to see if there’s a way we could thread the needle and use reconciliation and you kind of come back to the same place. Reconciliation obviously is about spending and revenue. And there are ways in which you could do pieces [of the SAVE America Act] but they’d be getting money to the states but then the states could decide whether or not to actually implement the policies,” Thune explained. “We’ve looked at it. There are no easy ways to do this. Believe me.”
1
Specialist-Day6721 Mar 24, 2026 +1
I think I remember a few years back they tried to fire the parliamentarian when they got a ruling they did not like. As I recall they failed to do so but I don't remember the specifics.
1
rpickens6661 Mar 24, 2026 +1
Wait for it... Wait for it....
1
SummerSun75 Mar 24, 2026 +1
Dotard is now a moderate, according to corporate media, reaching across the aisle.
1
iuieioiai Mar 24, 2026 +1
Nobody is saying that this ‘deal’ is terrible and throws away all leverage Dems have. The ‘deal’ should be no funding anything with Dem votes unless ICE is severely muzzled (no masks, judicial warrants required, accountability for murder, etc).
1
Demonking3343 Mar 24, 2026 +1
I don’t think this is really a good deal. So we are getting ice and its deportation efforts separated from the DHS funding wise. That way we can get the TSA and other DHS groups paid again. But the republicans are even saying in this article that they plan to just push that additional ice funding through via budget reconciliation. They also plan to try and force there voter suppression bill through with that as well. At least to me it seems like we are giving up any leverage we have.
1
FunkManSolarFlex Mar 24, 2026 +1
At the end of the day, ICE will be funded.
1
KingMario05 Mar 24, 2026 +1
That was never in question. But through the reconciliation, Dems can codify the reforms they want. That means no more masks, judicial warrants, and (hopefully) marked cars that don't look like a failed 90s airline. Otherwise? The ICE/ERO money tap turns off. *Effective immediately*, and for far longer than just fiscal year 2026.
1
blazesquall Mar 24, 2026 +1
.. how is that done through reconciliation..?
1
KingMario05 Mar 24, 2026 +1
We'll find out.
1
TheOsirisOfThisShit_ Mar 24, 2026 +1
That was determined last year.
1
kootles10 Mar 24, 2026 +1
Yup
1
Taurius2 Mar 24, 2026 +1
There was this one country that kept making compromises and capitulations for a tiny bit of their projects to get through over and over till there was nothing left of their party. The SAVE act will pass and ICE will be demanding documents at the polls. People will die trying to vote this Nov. Good luck, America. 250 years was a good run.
1
orlinsky Mar 24, 2026 +1
Democrats are holding regular Americans hostage yet again to make a political statement after losing the House and Senate in 2024. The Republicans will get their full DHS funding either now or during reconciliation it doesn't matter, meanwhile Democrats are abusing the filibuster because they're afraid of being primaried. The liberal wing has removed a lot of realist sanity from the party. We're left with very weak messaging while the traveling public grows frustrated and thousands of working class TSA employees are unpaid because the Democrats want concessions to fund basic government functions.
1
KingMario05 Mar 24, 2026 +1
Well, maybe ICE shouldn't be shooting people they disagree with. That sure would help.
1
← Back to Board