'Serious risk of radioactive contamination': Iran FM writes to UN over Bushehr nuclear strikes - The Times of India

"Whatabout Iran's was crimes", cried the boy not understanding that both parties in a war can commit war crimes.

I'm gonna blow your mind here Both sides are committing war crimes Just because Iran is evil doesnt make the US and Israel the good guys in this conflict, sometimes, like now, a conflict doesnt have a good guy

Legality is useless to discuss when there's no one around capable of enforcing it and punishing a violation. Also, kind of disingenuous to point out Iranian war crimes and conveniently omit US/Israeli hits on several schools, universities, medical facilities, residential areas, etc etc all over Iran and continued threats to bomb their power infra and desalination plants and, in the words of the American president himself "hitting them hard enough to send them back to the stone ages" and outright admission of "taking their oil". No doubt that the current Iranian regime is a major sponsor of terrorism worldwide and deserves condemnation but if Iran is a low level crook, the US is a mafia boss by comparison. The only reason the US doesn't face worse, let alone a similar level of condemnation to Iran from the rest of the world is because who can dare to go against the strongest, both economically and militarily, nation in the world?! You make one wrong move and US will rain down sanctions and tariffs on you if you're lucky, or bomb you and your loved ones to oblivion if unlucky.

They had no intent to target a school. 

We are on the same page for most of this. I don’t mean to conflate Iran’s previous evils with their current reaction to Trump, but more specifically the child shields NOW that you were referencing. But yes, they have a pattern of disgusting disregard for human life, and I agree it’s horrific. I agree they have long been a MASSIVE problem. But I don’t agree that military intervention - particularly this method - was imminently necessary or the correct approach to solve these issues. And to be clear I’m not an advocate of appeasement - and I don’t think it’s fair to equate diplomatic attempts to navigate this situation with Chamberlain’s non-responsiveness in the face of Hilter’s territorial expansion. I’d love for the Iranian people to be free of their subjugation and for the global threat of a religiously zealous nation to be subdued, but it was nonsensical to approach it like this and honestly it just stinks of opportunism rather than some sort of a moral or security imperative. There is no strategy and there has still been no actual reason given. So it pisses me off when I see people making opposition to the war out as some naive sympathy for the Iranian regime (which I know wasn’t you, but the original comment I replied to). It’s not in most cases, and that counter-messaging just sounds like propaganda to try and stifle alternative views and assert that this war was the one and only reasonable course of action. At this point we’re fucked anyway, the toothpaste can’t go back into the tube. But I’m not going to support this unjustified, self-serving violence masquerading as a moral good.

To rest of the world, both US and Iran can be bad at the same time. US for starting a war without strategy and killing students at a school by using outdated data, and Iran for hitting at its neighbours.

"so precise they can destroy a specific room in a specific building without damaging the surroundings" "The school was right next to a military base" Hmmmm...

You are deliberately misunderstanding and misrepresenting my point. Civilian structures near military is not uncommon world wide, so I am going to assume you aren't trying to blame Iran for the placement of the school. They hit the school because of bad intel, the chain of logistic broke, the weapons are only as accurate as the logistics and people behind them.