· 38 comments · Save ·
For Sale Apr 23, 2026 at 11:25 PM

‘Simpsons Movie 2’ to Receive $22 Million as California Starts Funding Animation

Posted by mlg1981


‘Simpsons Movie 2’ to Receive $22 Million as California Starts Funding Animation
Variety
‘Simpsons Movie 2’ to Receive $22 Million as California Starts Funding Animation
'The Simpsons Movie 2' will be among the first animated films to receive money from the state of California, with $22 million in tax incentives.

🚩 Report this post

38 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
Odd_Level9850 1 day ago +136
Simpsons doesn’t need funding; that money would have been better spent on smaller studios and brands.
136
ComputerDecent463 1 day ago +20
It would have been better funding healthcare and homeless shelters.
20
Kind_Development708 1 day ago +6
If they don’t get it they’ll go else where because another state or country will offer the tax credit. The state still makes money off of it but now instead of let’s say 25M it’s 3M in Tax’s. It’s just a race to the bottom because there is tax money to be made even with giving huge credits out for films. But places are gonna keep undercutting each other because a little bit of money is better than no money. (Which was of course a lot of money originally)
6
Neurojazz 1 day ago +7
Same! Safe!
7
hylo23 1 day ago +2
Maybe, just maybe the Simpsons will see it this way and pull in some of those little guys.
2
barrtoni 1 day ago +1
This is the way.
1
Faptainjack2 1 day ago +1
Or a futurama movie
1
St0n3yM33rkat 1 day ago +1
Nah. That time has come and gone. Newer Futurama is good but nowhere near the writing quality of the original seasons.
1
SeattleHasDied 1 day ago +20
This is bullshit! "The Simpsons" brand is a profit-making juggernaut and doesn't need any cinematic welfare.
20
silly_nate 1 day ago +3
Especially now that they’re an extension of Disney. Maybe if they were still just Fox and were going under and hadn’t been bought by a megacorp I could see justification for it.
3
Hawkwise83 1 day ago +14
Disney shouldn't qualify for government grants.
14
Stinky_TheCat 1 day ago +26
Totally the property that needed to be propped up by tax payer spending... Not you know... 2 million on 11 start ups. Why fund something new when you can shovel cash to some Corp.
26
ChunkStumpmon 1 day ago +4
It’s not animated in California
4
Tenoch_12 1 day ago +1
Yes it is
1
ChunkStumpmon 1 day ago +1
When did that happen?
1
Tenoch_12 1 day ago +1
It's always been animated in California
1
ChunkStumpmon 1 day ago +1
[no it’s animated in Korea](https://responsejournal.net/issue/2024-11/feature/between-seoul-springfield)
1
metsfanapk 22 hr ago
That shows it’s animated (the key poses which there are a lot of) in California then Korea does the in betweens which is a lot of small movements like mouth and eye movements. This is like saying some of the best animators in Disney history aren’t animating it because they didn’t animate every frame. There needs to be 24 images every second. Approximately 32,000 every episode. The fact that California only does 1-2k doesn’t mean it’s not animated here. Doesn’t downplay what the Korean animators bring to the simpsons but “it’s not animated here” is false
0
ChunkStumpmon 19 hr ago +2
That’s the kind of specious reasoning I don’t abide by fella
2
Comfortable_Care2715 1 day ago +10
Really? Disney can’t afford it?
10
sucobe 1 day ago +8
F*** off giving Simpsons $22M. Absolutely f*** off.
8
cornwallisdoggington 1 day ago +3
Stop! He’s already dead
3
Bruggenmeister 1 day ago +3
Actors get millions voicing a single Episode ...
3
Jack_Q_Frost_Jr 1 day ago +6
Who knows what adventures they'll have between now and the time the movies become unprofitable?
6
No-Lead-6769 1 day ago +7
This should piss people off more than it does.. along with tax payer funded stadiums and bribes to companies to relocate, politician insider trading.. 
7
so1i1oquy 1 day ago +4
I mean, the Simpsons is kind of like a 501c3 at this point.
4
3six5 1 day ago +1
Is that a model number for a pacifier?
1
so1i1oquy 1 day ago +2
Sort of
2
liverstealer 1 day ago +2
Marge’s necklace should be red.
2
FantasyBaseballChamp 1 day ago +2
Awful Show is Awful Rich
2
ol-gormsby 1 day ago +1
What I want to see is a puppet version of "The Boys" - but I know that Matt & Trey have said "never again" for puppets. Who else might be able to do it?
1
ragonastik39 1 day ago +1
If the movie is being worked on/animated in California then I don’t see an issue. That’s tax dollars going to create jobs but I’m not American so I don’t know how stuff works there haha.
1
bforce1313 7 hr ago +1
Seems like funding smaller or other animation ventures would have been better?
1
jesseeme 1 day ago +1
Disneys a new player in this animation thing you guys, this money could really get their name out there.
1
Bebopdavidson 1 day ago +1
I hope they do spider-pig again. That’s literally all I remember from the last one. And I can recite the first few seasons
1
A-Good-Weather-Man 1 day ago
“Fire up the sweat shops! Business is boomin!”
0
OneBillPhil 1 day ago
It’s good that a young upstart franchise like the Simpsons can get help from the government. 
0
bob_lala 1 day ago -3
Simpsons, the TV show isn’t even animated in the United States
-3
← Back to Board