ListNook

didsomebodysaymyname Mar 14, 2026 +333

Terrible person continues to be terrible.

333

green_gold_purple Mar 15, 2026 +24

News at 11!

24

littlemachina Mar 15, 2026 +12

It’s gotta be clinical. Not that it’s excusable in any way but there’s definitely a pattern of antisocial behavior in her.

12

AudibleNod Mar 14, 2026 +2922

>North Carolina is one of a handful of states that allow jilted spouses to sue for “alienation of affection” to seek damages from a third party responsible for the breakup of their marriage. Interesting. Never heard of alienation of affection as a legal construct. The other states are Hawaii, Mississippi, South Dakota, Utah, and South Carolina. [Brenay Kennard had to pay $1.75 million in November 2025.](https://people.com/tiktoker-ordered-to-pay-husband-ex-wife-1-75-million-for-alienation-of-affection-11847383)

2922

[deleted] Mar 14, 2026 +911

[deleted]

911

Saetric Mar 14, 2026 +1537

Did he leave his Ole Miss for his New Miss?

1537

Kolipe Mar 14, 2026 +306

And it left him with an Ole Mess

306

Mobile_Television_28 Mar 14, 2026 +26

I got to make it 69. Yes, I'm mentally 11 years old.

26

Pork_chop_sammich Mar 14, 2026 +47

Both ditched him. He had No Miss (no idea if that’s true)

47

Dragon6172 Mar 14, 2026 +23

Then he was in Miss-ouri

23

punkalunka Mar 15, 2026 +12

Miss-ouri loves company.

12

novemberdown Mar 14, 2026 +59

Get out

59

Picacco Mar 14, 2026 +40

But, also, please stay

40

sandwich_influence Mar 14, 2026 +17

But, also, get down.

17

punkalunka Mar 15, 2026 +4

Alienation of affection! You're sued buddy.

4

yenom_esol Mar 14, 2026 +6

I heard he fell for a Swiss Miss.

6

Yabba_Dabba_Doofus Mar 14, 2026 +25

I learned it from *Boston Legal*: Loss of Consortium(sex/affection): >In Massachusetts, loss of consortium is a legal claim allowing spouses (and sometimes parents/children) to seek compensation when a serious injury severely disrupts their family relationship, companionship, affection, and intimacy due to another party's negligence. It acts as a separate claim in personal injury cases to address the loss of household support, care, and emotional comfort.

25

orange-shades Mar 15, 2026 +25

Denny Crane

25

Yabba_Dabba_Doofus Mar 15, 2026 +8

Shirley Schmidt

8

Chip_Hazard Mar 15, 2026 +21

Loss of consortium is different, as it says in your quote it stems from a serious injury causing a disruption to a relationship. Like a husband gets in a car crash and becomes bedridden, so the wife can sue the driver at fault for her own damages for loss of consortium. This is some weird thing where if your husband cheats on you with someone, you can sue the person they cheated on you with for damages, no injury required

21

Waderriffic Mar 15, 2026 +6

That’s not exactly the same thing. Loss of consortium usually only applies when injury prevents one party from having sex with their spouse.

6

kayne86 Mar 14, 2026 +12

I first heard of it with Eagles legend fletcher cox

12

ditka Mar 14, 2026 +6

Oh I love Fletcher Cox's harmonies on Hotel California

6

FrankSoStank Mar 14, 2026 +237

And in 2011 [there’s another case in NC](https://www.newsobserver.com/latest-news/article215633900.html) where the former spouse was awarded $30 million.

237

pnutbrutal Mar 14, 2026 +87

I wonder what kind of evidence you use to bring to prove the alienation tho.

87

Emergency-Two-6407 Mar 14, 2026 +153

Probably just proof of the infidelity. Private investigator type of work

153

TiberiusCornelius Mar 14, 2026 +38

I know in Hawaii you have to prove the cheating spouse didn't seek out/initiate the affair (the other person has to have come onto them) and show "lack of marital fault" so if your marriage was already on the rocks before your wife/husband cheated on you you're SOL. Other states may have different thresholds.

38

FlashGordonCommons Mar 14, 2026 +62

I would hope you'd also have to prove 1) that the third party knew about the marriage and 2) that the third party knew they were doing harm to the marriage ....otherwise I might be fucked and I imagine there would be plenty others in my situation. here's a pro-tip: just cuz someone puts "ENM" in their tinder bio and assures you their husband is perfectly aware and that "they have an understanding" doesn't mean they're not a lying f****** b****. "ethical" non-monogamy my ass now I have to feel guilty for the rest of my life. cheaters are the f****** worst.

62

MadAstrid Mar 14, 2026 +50

Basically, (I am not a lawyer) it boils down to the person knowing their affair partner is married and being told, by the spouse, to back the hell off and then not backing the hell off. As far as I recall.

50

ErraticDragon Mar 14, 2026 +17

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alienation_of_affections > An action for alienation of affection does not require proof of extramarital sex. An alienation claim is difficult to establish because it comprises several elements and there are several defenses. >To succeed on an alienation claim, the plaintiff has to show the following elements: >* the marriage entailed love between the spouses in some degree; * the spousal love was alienated; * the defendant's malicious conduct contributed to or caused the loss of affection. >It is not necessary to show that the defendant set out to destroy the marital relationship, but only that he or she intentionally engaged in acts which would foreseeably impact the marriage. >Thus, **the defendant has a defense against an alienation claim where it can be shown that he or she did not know that the object of his or her affections was in fact married.** It is not a defense that the guilty spouse consented to the defendant's conduct, but it might be a defense that the defendant was not the active and aggressive seducer. >If the defendant's conduct was somehow inadvertent, the plaintiff would be unable to show intentional or malicious action. But prior marital problems do not establish a defense unless such unhappiness had reached a level of negating love between the spouses.

17

mschuster91 Mar 14, 2026 +37

>now I have to feel guilty for the rest of my life Don't. You were not responsible for any of what happened.

37

Comfortable_Studio37 Mar 14, 2026 +9

You're exactly right, but unfortunately that's not how the human conscience works. _Victims_ of crimes or violence or abuse often feel guilty and ashamed themselves, as if they did something wrong or caused their own mistreatment.

9

FlashGordonCommons Mar 14, 2026 +14

Logically I know that but emotionally is a different story. the scene where the husband found out was devastating and it's still on repeat in my brain. I'm in therapy (for other things as well as this) but it's feeling like I'm still at the beginning of a long long road. still, thank you for the kind words. I appreciate you.

14

rocky8u Mar 15, 2026 +5

To prove the alienation the plaintiff must prove that "the love and affection of *her* spouse for *her* was seriously diminished or destroyed". Then they must prove: > that the controlling or effective proximate cause of the alienation of the genuine marital relationship between the plaintiff and *her* spouse was malicious and wrongful conduct on the part of the defendant [which took place in the State of North Carolina] [which occurred before the plaintiff and *her* spouse physically separated with the intent on the part of either the plaintiff or *her* spouse that the physical separation remain permanent]. https://www.sog.unc.edu/sites/default/files/pji-master/c/c800.20%20Alienation%20of%20Affection.%20[12-2016].pdf (I replaced male pronouns with female ones because the plaintiff is female in this case) This document is a template for jury instructions from 2016 but I doubt it has changed much since then.

5

wombasrevenge Mar 14, 2026 +89

That's actually legal here in Japan. Spouses can sue the person that broke up the marriage.

89

Zestyclose-Novel1157 Mar 14, 2026 +119

It just seems like an excuse to not hold the married person accountable again. Oh well.

119

wombasrevenge Mar 14, 2026 +31

I completely agree. It's also the same for child custody here, the courts usually award full custody to mothers but a law recently passed that lets the parents work it out for joint custody. That created a lot of foreign fathers that were unable to see their children.

31

Spetznazx Mar 15, 2026 +14

Its actually the opposite, the law also made it so n whoever was awarded custody had to pay full child support. The father in this case didn't have to pay a dime so a lot of foreign dads would knock a woman up and dip and have zero repercussions because the court would just always make the woman take care of the child. Its why there aee horror stories or women dropping kids off at the base hoping the bass would take responsibility.

14

AStrangerWCandy Mar 15, 2026 +18

The married spouse should be held accountable but I don't get the attitude that the person cheating with the spouse should be held harmless. If you are actively pursuing a romantic relationship with someone you know is married you are also intentionally choosing to harm the married individual's partner. And not just in a "you hurt their feelings" kinda way, its actual material harm when you consider the downstream effects of divorce etc...

18

ColossalJuggernaut Mar 14, 2026 +15

> South Dakota ...Kristi Noem's husband bout to get paid

15

helrazr Mar 14, 2026 +10

For no particular reason at all, it would be nice for this to exist in VA /s

10

chrysothronos Mar 14, 2026 +6

brenay and tim's, uh, saga is how i learned about this. it's a rabbit hole of drama.

6

Prestigious_Owl7632 Mar 14, 2026 +14

Not SC

14

didsomebodysaymyname Mar 14, 2026 +22

>to seek damages from a third party responsible for the breakup of their marriage. I can understand damages from the person who cheats, but to me it's absurd to be able to sue the other man/woman/person. They aren't responsible for the breakup for the marriage, the person who cheats is. They are fundamentally the only person who can be.

22

WhiteSriLankan Mar 14, 2026 +57

Is it possibly more of a “we can prove that you knew they were married and got involved anyway, so now you’re both dicks” kind of thing?

57

thesymbiont Mar 14, 2026 +16

It makes sense financially. Scenario: Persons A and B are married, and B has an affair with C. Person B gets half the relationship assets in the divorce, likely leaving A in significantly worse financial position than if the marriage remained intact (divorce, splitting a house, living independently, etc. are expensive). C is now in a relationship with B and has access to B's assets from the divorce, effectively profiting from breaking up a marriage. With this law, A can go after C financially.

16

didsomebodysaymyname Mar 14, 2026 +7

That doesn't really add up. Person B could file for no fault divorce and get the same assets. Person C has no legal rights to person B's post divorce assets. Person B could give their post divorce assets to anyone, a friend, charity, anyone could benefit. Does that give person A rights to sue a friend or charity? Also, they are person B's assets, that's the whole point of the divorce. Most importantly, regardless of Person Cs gain, they are not responsible for breaking up the marriage, **person B is when they chose to cheat.** There are also existing remedies to cheating. If you're concerned about cheating, add an infidelity clause to your pre-nup and it can significantly change distribution of assets in that case.

7

AStrangerWCandy Mar 15, 2026 +8

If they know the person is married they absolutely are partially responsible for breaking up the marriage. You can't choose to intentionally harm another person and then eschew responsibility.

8

teddykaygeebee Mar 14, 2026 +853

She's everything a politician (and person) shouldn't be. A corrupt snake who only cares about enriching herself.

853

Adjective-Noun-nnnn Mar 15, 2026 +268

She's as unfaithful to her spouse as her constituents. *rimshot*

268

TheMidnightAnimal0 Mar 15, 2026 +34

I think backshot would fit better here.

34

Few_Watercress_4533 Mar 15, 2026 +26

She is a traitor to this country.

26

Marginallyhuman Mar 14, 2026 +1156

Seeing a future headline of Sinema raging at the injustice of how the suit turned out would make me smile.

1156

ClaudeGascoigne Mar 14, 2026 +891

I hope she loses and gets hit with the maximum damages. I'll never forget that stupid f****** cursty she did when voting against a federal minimum wage of $15/hr or how she, basically immediately after that, switched from Democrat to Independent. Even before that she voted with Republicans on things like military funding and veteran care. I'm convinced that she originally ran as a Democrat just to get a seat in her district.

891

asusc Mar 14, 2026 +283

I voted for her multiple times. Now, looking back, it’s almost certain her story changed to fit the narrative of whatever she needed to move the next level up. https://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news/kyrsten-sinema-new-york-times-childhood-homelessness-10865253/ Lying about growing up homeless, being so vocal about being bi-sexual, and then morphing into an “independent” which we all knew was just republican. All of it was fake, just like Trump, but more polished. She said what she needed to say to the people in the room to get ahead, and she had no problem lying or changing, as long as she was benefitting. Recently she’s back in AZ trying to push data centers. Thankfully seems like most people from both parties see how full of shit she is now, and no longer pay attention to her.

283

JefeRex Mar 14, 2026 +77

I think she just likes attention and it’s so severe that it probably rises to the level of a personality disorder. I watched her very slightly from afar after I looked up social workers in Congress when I was in grad school getting my MSW, must have been around 2013. So I was confused here and there hearing little bits and pieces about her and eventually started looking more closely and became very disappointed even before the total crash out. She is an embarrassment to our profession. I think she just positions herself where she will get maximum attention, whether that means masquerading as a Green or a bisexual or the moderate whose vote the whole country is watching with bated breath. Anything for attention.

77

asusc Mar 14, 2026 +45

Totally. Once she didn’t need being green or bisexual, and it couldn’t gain her anything else, it didn’t matter anymore. Same thing once she got to the senate. After she realized she didn’t need to be a “democrat” and it was much more lucrative for her personally to abandon that as well, it came naturally to her. That’s why she had no problem being so tone deaf with her bullshit theatrics on the healthcare vote and minimum wage vote. Someone who actually grew up homeless in an abandoned gas station never would have done that. A democrat or principled independent never would have done that either. But she was just reinventing herself once again, onto the next grift. How those she grifted she left behind were no longer of her concern. She had much more important “affairs” to attend to, apparently.

45

JefeRex Mar 14, 2026 +9

Haha she sure did find some more important “affairs” to attend to. Get after it girl.

9

xanthippe115 Mar 15, 2026 +25

To be fair, our alternative was Martha F****** McSally and I would have crawled over broken glass to vote for a baked potato before I'd ever vote for a scumbag R. Sinema was awful but she did provide the D majority needed in the Senate to secure committee chairs.

25

clutchy42 Mar 15, 2026 +17

It's crazy now much of our modern politics can be attributed to shameless grifters.

17

caustic_smegma Mar 15, 2026 +11

She's right up there with sKari Lake for me. F*** both of them, and I don't mean that literally. They're both awful, ugly people inside and out. I would love if we could somehow trebuchet them both a few states over to Texas or further.

11

IndividualFun1892 Mar 14, 2026 +241

That f****** curtsy with the no vote sent me into the biggest rage.

241

Admiral_Ackbar_1325 Mar 14, 2026 +79

I'm sure she's happy it did too.

79

Wingzerofyf Mar 14, 2026 +103

Goldman Sachs thanked her for service with $$$$ that she used to jetset and have said affair https://www.politico.com/news/2021/10/15/sinema-campaign-money-pharma-finance-516110 Roosters coming home to roost....

103

ThePrussianGrippe Mar 15, 2026 +10

Correct me if I’m wrong but she even did an exaggerated thumbs down and “nyeh” sound when she did it, too. Just unbelievable levels of immaturity.

10

userhwon Mar 14, 2026 +73

\>she originally ran as a Democrat just to get a seat in her district She did. I sent her lying ass money. I hope the lady suing her gets it.

73

Iohet Mar 14, 2026 +31

> I'm convinced that she originally ran as a Democrat just to get a seat in her district. She's a Green. Greens are heavily Russian influenced plants

31

m0nk_3y_gw Mar 15, 2026 +17

She was originally elected in ~2003, running as a Democrat. Back then she was bashing Joe Lieberman for being a turncoat. How the turn tables.

17

[deleted] Mar 14, 2026 +219

[removed]

219

EngelSterben Mar 14, 2026 +126

Well Manchin was the Senator for West f****** Virginia and as evident by his replacement, he was the best you were getting

126

WelpSigh Mar 14, 2026 +135

Manchin is a sanctimonious ass, but his vote was gettable at least. He did compromise with progressives and vote for legislation he didn't like. And he was from a blood red state, the highest federal party outperformer in the country. Considering his single-minded focus on the deficit, it was a miracle he ever voted with the Dems during the Biden administration. Sinema was a thoroughly corrupt, unrepentant shithead. Voted based on her whims without any obvious ideological consistently, never explained herself to constituents or the press, lived a life of luxury on campaign dollars that were meant to keep her seat blue. Awful senator who very much deserved to get unceremoniously booted.

135

EngelSterben Mar 14, 2026 +52

Yeah, there is a massive difference between Manchin and Sinema, especially considering the two current Senators form the state. Manchin, you knew what you were going to have to deal with considering the state he represented. Arizona is not West Virginia and she should get more shit than someone who represented WV.

52

CustodialApathy Mar 14, 2026 +26

Manchin was a politician at heart but he at least played the game and was identifiable as such. Sinema was a straight liar for personal gain. I don't like Manchin but that's because of the environment he inhabited and decades of placating a non-profrsssive audience resulted in.

26

judgejuddhirsch Mar 14, 2026 +15

Arguably 50 other senators are "singlehandedly" to blame too

15

AustinBaze Mar 14, 2026 +580

POS Sinema transitioned into a lying thieving republican right before our eyes, and said FU to all who chose to support her and her campaign based on her lies. She's the Fetterman of the dress wearing set maybe with less spine intact.

580

PatchyWhiskers Mar 14, 2026 +339

Unlike Fetterman, no brain damage. She always intended to be a turncoat. She planned it.

339

Emergency-Two-6407 Mar 14, 2026 +84

I’m not convinced his stroke was real. You’re telling me he just so happened to have a stroke that caused his political beliefs to do a 180 right after he’s elected to the senate but before he assumes office? I think he was a plant, because they knew Mehmet Oz was too much of a pill for moderates to swallow

84

lenzflare Mar 14, 2026 +38

Seems like he was a racist a****** before the stroke

38

LargeConstruction393 Mar 15, 2026 +13

Unfortunately, Pennsylvania voters are not known for electing great senators or governors.

13

-CJF- Mar 14, 2026 +34

I can believe his stroke was real but not that it turned him into a Republican.

34

periodicsheep Mar 14, 2026 +77

brain injury can absolutely change a person’s political beliefs. brain injury can be completely devastating in terms of personality changes, implylse control, morals. it’s absolutely likely the stroke changed him. but i also believe he wasn’t nearly the progressive hero he claimed to be.

77

TheMadBug Mar 15, 2026 +3

The guy was a bit of a wild card pre-stroke, but he came with a wild energy that the Democrats felt they needed (Chuck Shumer for example could be a really good policy maker but not a good political fighter). The stroke explanation is real, but he was no saint prior - the kind of a****** who thinks he’s being a hero waving his gun around at people the wrong colour jog near his home, the stroke just meant his chaotic energy dropped even the occasional compassionate goal. Also yeah, no one wanted Dr Oz to win.

3

LupusLycas Mar 14, 2026 +36

Sinema used to be in the Green Party. As a Democrat, she acted like what the Greens say Democrats are.

36

AustinBaze Mar 14, 2026 +14

She ended up underwater in polls of all parties. There were even Republicans who hated how much she lied--hard as that is to imagine today.

14

N0r3m0rse Mar 14, 2026 +21

Considering the poster child for the greens is Jill stein it doesn't surprise me that sinema was a lying sack of shit.

21

TheUnluckyBard Mar 15, 2026 +16

Ah, yes, the Russian Cicada. Crawls out from under a rock every four years, makes a lot of noise, leaves a mess all over, then crawls back under her rock and nobody will hear a peep from her until the next presidential election.

16

1zzie Mar 15, 2026 +12

She gave [campaign funds](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/01/kyrsten-sinema-senator-bodyguard-payment?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other) to that guy for a different fake job. That's definitely illegal campaign fraud. The affair itself is chum for the Puritan masses. So thievery is 🎯 >FEC records show that between July 2024 and October 2025, Ammel received a total of more than $128,000 from Sinema for Arizona and a separate political action committee tied to the former senator

12

Scaryclouds Mar 14, 2026 +943

What an absolute PoS Sinema turned out to be. As much shit people have for Schumer or Manchin… they are leagues better than the Lois of Sinema or Fetterman for that matter.

943

TimmyTimeify Mar 14, 2026 +606

I'll never forget her "yas queen slaaay" thumbs down vote for increased federal minimum wage. One of the most cursed things I've seen a supposed Dem senator do.

606

RenoRiley1 Mar 14, 2026 +224

Don’t forget she specifically did that little display for Mitch McConnell. She made sure he was watching. Truly wretched

224

lenzflare Mar 14, 2026 +47

Oh, she was copying the McCain gesture, ironically for going *against* killing Obamacare, right in front of McConnell.

47

JcbAzPx Mar 14, 2026 +55

She was doing it to pander to John McCain fans in AZ, since he had done much the same thing for an actually good reason during his last term. It instantly backfired on her.

55

EmuMan10 Mar 14, 2026 +17

And now we have Kelly and Gallego. Upgrades people!

17

DontTickleTheDriver1 Mar 14, 2026 +92

I'll randomly think about that every now and then. It really showed us how little these politicians care about us. The US is led by narcissistic assholes only interested in power and money.

92

GetsBetterAfterAFew Mar 14, 2026 +75

WTF? Manchin literally killed BBB, Sinema stalled it but never cast a no vote , Manchin did. Manchin voted no on key Biden judiciarys, he voted no on For the People Act. Sinema with Manchin stalker filibuster act and fucked over a federal minimum wage bill BUT Manchin was key to helping stop Bidens administrative plans. F*** Sinema, she was a traitor to the progressive party and eventually got hers, meanwhile Manchin is rolling in energy money from bills he help enact and stop. The idea Manchin is better than Sinema is laughable, please. Im not even going to get into Schumer because typing out his shit list would take hours because hes fucked us over SINCE 1981... again wft are you talking about. Are you a propagandist or what?

75

periodicsheep Mar 14, 2026 +97

manchin was upfront about who he was and what his priorities were. sinema lied to get elected, then worked to f*** over the people who voted for her.

97

OmniMinuteman Mar 14, 2026 +13

And if he wasn’t in office a Republican would have been, who would have voted along with the dems 0 times instead of sometimes.

13

radicalelation Mar 14, 2026 +16

Sinema came from the Greens, who have hurt progressives far more than helped. The most obvious controlled opposition.

16

212312383 Mar 14, 2026 +117

Machin was a democrat in West Virginia, one of the most red states in the country. Arizona literally voted for Biden lol

117

SHUT_DOWN_EVERYTHING Mar 15, 2026 +17

Yeah, these things are not comparable. Manchin was a Democrat but also has to represent his state. If he always voted with Democrats the end result would have been one more Republican senator from WV who would always vote against Democrats. With Manchin gone, we now have Capito and Justice. Things got worse. Sinema on the other hand had no reason to vote the way she did.

17

Herakleios Mar 14, 2026 +42

Manchin was always going to be the most conservative National democrat by a wide margin. He was the Senator from WV, the state that went for Trump harder than basically any other state. He still voted with Dems on like 80% of things, which is 80% better than a Republican from WV would have been.

42

Bodoblock Mar 14, 2026 +16

The alternative to Manchin was Jim Justice. The alternative to Sinema was Ruben Gallego. Manchin was absolutely better.

16

robodrew Mar 14, 2026 +3

I'm so f****** mad that I voted for her. Multiple times. She truly betrayed me and the rest of her constituency when she got to the Senate.

3

JonBoutDatDough Mar 14, 2026 +25

Wrong. Schumer is equal trash if not more trash considering he is still in office and wields more power

25

RespectedPath Mar 14, 2026 +136

Sinema is legit a Republican trojan horse.

136

SpiderSlitScrotums Mar 14, 2026 +28

The eternal question of what is worse: a very bad person who has little impact or a moderately bad person who has enormous impact? My vote is with the latter. Letting fascism overrun the republic while having the means to oppose it is going to have repercussions for generations.

28

owa00 Mar 14, 2026 +27

Sinema and Manchin had 10x the power Schumer had because they were the deciding votes that fucked any legislation the Dems wanted to pass. Schumer was going to go with whatever the majority of the party wanted to push. If he didn't bring something for a vote it's because of want going to pass. Manchin and Sinema browbeat the Dems into watering down anything they passed to make it more GOP friendly.

27

Plantatnalp Mar 14, 2026 +7

Which is Sinema in this instance, and which are you saying is Schumer?

7

Szymaniak Mar 14, 2026 +13

In the distance, we see Kissinger's ghost driving a tank over the "Por qué no los dos?"- girl.

13

SilentSasquatch2 Mar 14, 2026 +107

Morally bankrupt and self serving at all levels of her life. Scummy to the supreme

107

T-Marie-N Mar 14, 2026 +19

So the next head of DHS?

19

Greyboxer Mar 14, 2026 +134

This woman is disgusting

134

kidsally Mar 14, 2026 +15

Wouldn’t.

15

Acceptable-Bus-2017 Mar 14, 2026 +20

I was hoping to never see or hear about her again

20

roadsidefoto Mar 14, 2026 +38

I hope this lawsuit goes absolutely, horribly, stunningly well for the ex wife.

38

[deleted] Mar 14, 2026 +30

I'm so amazed she turned out to be trash just like most of her colleagues. You'd think a vapid opportunistic attention-starved clown would know better!

30

thechilecowboy Mar 14, 2026 +3

Excellent description

3

SuspiciousYard2484 Mar 14, 2026 +23

She caused irreparable damage to our Republic just on her own

23

Square-Weight4148 Mar 14, 2026 +31

Why does America always elect the worst humans as leaders?

31

psdpro7 Mar 14, 2026 +17

All the good-hearted people see how toxic politics are and stay far away.

17

Wolfwoods_Sister Mar 15, 2026 +7

We don’t. Lincoln. Teddy Roosevelt. FDR. Truman. Eisenhower. Jimmy Carter. Obama. Biden. Electing monsters is a human problem, not an American problem. We fall and rise just like everyone else.

7

say592 Mar 15, 2026 +4

Plus, "America" didn't elect her. Arizona did. I'm not making excuses for her, she is a terrible person, but she's also hardly a monster or "the worst". There are people in politics who actively support war crimes. There are rapists and pedophiles and those who project rapists and pedophiles. Someone who lied to their constituents, made a bunch of money, and cheated on their spouse is pretty tame in comparison.

4

InternationalFailure Mar 14, 2026 +56

The Democrat consistently voting with Republicans and being Conservative is a piece of garbage? Noooo, you're kidding?

56

OW2007 Mar 14, 2026 +7

I'm starting to thing she's not a good person...

7

beingtwiceasnice Mar 14, 2026 +7

This lady's a walking red flag.

7

Admirabletooshie Mar 14, 2026 +7

Sinema was such a disappointment. She had good talk but when voting she was practically a republican.

7

The-Struggle-90806 Mar 14, 2026 +6

Yes it’s called a scammer.

6

RandomGuy622170 Mar 15, 2026 +7

Surprise, surprise, Sinema is exactly the piece of shit we all thought she was while her and douchebag Joe Manchin were blocking key pieces of Democratic legislation. F*** her. I hope the ex-wife gets everything she's asking for.

7

PsychologicalSir8508 Mar 14, 2026 +12

She certainly ripped off her Az democrats who voted for her and I was one of them 🤬

12

--solitude-- Mar 14, 2026 +6

Sinema is a grifter who enriched herself while in office. She soaked up the attention of being a key vote, then usually sided with the Republicans. She was such a disappointment, and it’s not surprising that she’s now embroiled in this drama.

6

notacyborg Mar 15, 2026 +7

Who gives a flying f*** about this dumb b****?

7

oingapogo Mar 15, 2026 +7

Where are all the conservatives excoriating her for this? Oh yeah, they are too busy denying the man they elected fucks children.

7

Eddiebaby7 Mar 15, 2026 +5

Was anything about her real?

5

petarisawesomeo Mar 15, 2026 +8

The grifting

8

Happy_Wolverine9888 Mar 14, 2026 +15

I hope Sinema loses this suit big time. She’s a nasty piece of work and is overdue for some comeuppance.

15

Ragnarotico Mar 14, 2026 +4

So basically, Bodyguard on Netflix?

4

mabols Mar 14, 2026 +4

They didn’t call her an attention w**** for nothing.

4

Seeking-Something-3 Mar 14, 2026 +4

Sigh - I’m glad it’s bad news for her but can she f*** off in to history like she always intended?

4

nosecohn Mar 15, 2026 +5

Since gay marriage is now legal, this headline might be a little ambiguous for some, so to clarify, Sinema contends she shouldn’t be subject to a lawsuit by the ex-wife of the male security guard Sinema had an affair with. The ex-wife blames Sinema for the marriage breakup.

5

JBMacGill Mar 15, 2026 +6

I hate this woman and I wish her only the worst.

6

TeamHope4 Mar 15, 2026 +5

Romance? Affair. He’s married.

5

GangstaRIB Mar 14, 2026 +34

Sinema went from full blown Medicare for all left progressive to a homewrecking gay republican…. Or I guess that’s just all republicans. looking at you grindr Mike Johnson and lady G Lindsey graham. But with that being said what the f*** kind of lawsuit is this. How are these even laws?

34

Flimsy-Attention-722 Mar 14, 2026 +7

It is a law on NC books and it has gotten some big $$ for the injured spouse

7

flaptaincappers Mar 14, 2026 +21

Kirsten Sinema was the perfect liberal and later centrist. The epitome of slapping a pride flag on a bunker buster and gloating about how a WOWman can do it just as good as a man can. That curtsey when voting no on raising the minimum wage was such peak affluent white liberalism. She'll be in college history and sociology books under the chapters about grifters and "f*** you I got mine"

21

N0r3m0rse Mar 14, 2026 +4

Shes anything but liberal. Shes at best grossly neo liberal only for her own benefit.

4

So_spoke_the_wizard Mar 14, 2026 +5

Can someone explain why a suit filed in NC court based on an NC law was moved to a Federal court?

5

The-Struggle-90806 Mar 14, 2026 +3

Because they’re suing someone who lives in another state. If sinema lives in Arizona still, she’s such a grifter. I wouldn’t be surprised if she had an apartment in North Carolina to dip with that man and flew to Arizona on occasion for the sake of her “job”. Shady boots.

3

So_spoke_the_wizard Mar 15, 2026 +2

That's interesting. Assuming the crime was committed in NC at least once, I'd assume that where she lived would be irrelevant. Especially since there is no federal law equivalent. That's like sending DUI cases to the federal courts because the driver lived in another state. But laws are meant to be ~~broken~~ manipulated.

2

falconlogic Mar 15, 2026 +4

In how many ways can a person be horrible?

4

fallingdowndizzyvr Mar 15, 2026 +5

The way I read the title was the Sinema has an ex-wife that was suing her because of her romance with a security guard.

5

mavigogun Mar 15, 2026 +5

Will Sinema be calling for her own resignation, or is that just an Al Franken thing?

5

Dr-Venture Mar 15, 2026 +4

What f****** rock did we move to have her pop up again???

4

AnusOprah Mar 15, 2026 +5

Yeah yeah, he was dignifying her in the ass, at the Jefferson Hotel, Room 1210...

5

penguished Mar 15, 2026 +3

She's seemed pathologically screwed up for a long time.

3

lostroadrunner22 Mar 14, 2026 +8

Sinema really lived it up on donor and taxpayer money. Stunned no one has really investigated her

8

iconmotocbr Mar 14, 2026 +11

This is turning into a cinema

11

Ohuigin Mar 14, 2026 +10

Clearly, her mistake was that it wasn’t an underage child that she was having an affair with.

10

VonBeegs Mar 14, 2026 +7

I hope she hast to spend/turn over all her blood money for this.

7

ConsiderationSea1347 Mar 15, 2026 +5

Isn’t this a gender flipped equivalent of a CEO banging his secretary? The power dynamics here make the consent waters really muddy.

5

modohobo Mar 14, 2026 +3

As someone who voted for her I hope she loses some money in the lawsuit. She lied to Arizona

3

NotSoWishful Mar 14, 2026 +3

Shocker. She’s a shitty person all the way around

3

FeralNecromancer Mar 14, 2026 +3

‘Lawmaker argues that law doesn’t apply to her’

3

kt2984 Mar 14, 2026 +3

Honestly though, she was always f****** all of us every chance she got.

3

toothpeeler Mar 15, 2026 +3

Who cares? The world is burning.

3

jkeen1960 Mar 15, 2026 +3

Because of people like her.

3

flanner_alum Mar 15, 2026 +3

didn’t think I could hate her more I stand corrected

3

theresa_richter Mar 15, 2026 +3

My main takeaway is that it has to suck for people like her lawyer that are stuck with a surname associated with truly vile actions. And yeah, her lawyer is representing scum, but everyone needs lawyers when interacting with our shitty legal system, even deplorable people like Sinema.

3

Whiteshadow021 Mar 15, 2026 +3

After everything she turned out to be, a homewrecker doesn’t surprise me

3

kqlx Mar 15, 2026 +5

I honestly don't really care about this or her. She is proven to be a terrible two faced person in politics and this proves that shes just the same outside of it as well.

5

ImamTrump Mar 15, 2026 +3

This one reads right out of house of cards.

3

supergiraffeman Mar 15, 2026 +3

That's what you get for the double peace signs b****.

3

vroart Mar 15, 2026 +3

Sigh, please don’t tell me. I just know it’s all sorts of kink that proves how insecure she always was

3

Zagden Mar 14, 2026 +5

I love how Sinema and Massachusetts' Maura Healey prove that congressional/government representation for LGBTQ people is great, but if you aren't selective about who you send there and base it purely on their identity, then you run the risk of having gay corruption scandals instead of straight ones, which isn't an inspiring difference

5

DoggiEyez Mar 14, 2026 +9

It is wild to me how much politicians sleep around. It seems like it is more than the "liberal" folks in Hollywood. It's like everyday you hear about some affair shit.

9

kitkatkorgi Mar 14, 2026 +4

Hope the x wife gets it all. Sinema is so tainted

4

awesomedan24 Mar 15, 2026 +5

At least Fetterman had brain damage, whats her excuse for becoming Republican and breaking every campaign promise?

5

lakast Mar 15, 2026 +6

I'm still pissed at her over pushing Franken out. He was an excellent Senator and his voice has been missed. We needed him.

6

BlueHighwindz Mar 14, 2026 +8

I was hoping next time I heard this name would be either an indictment or a eulogy.

8

TheSpaceman1975 Mar 14, 2026 +2

A living breathing trainwreck.

2

Dunge Mar 14, 2026 +2

As much as I hate her for her voting record, I have absolutely no reason to care about her personal love life.

2

Examinator2 Mar 14, 2026 +2

If only voters that trusted her could sue the lying ass b****.

2

Most-Lengthiness-471 Mar 14, 2026 +2

Surprised anyone would wanna lay with that disgusting clown.

2

narsfweasels Mar 15, 2026 +2

Well, we always knew she was of poor character, and this is yet another layer of icing on the cake.

2

egoVirus Mar 15, 2026 +2

Hope she gets dementia and lingers for decades, alone. Awful awful human being.

2

quicksite Mar 15, 2026 +2

She's trash so I don't blame the ex-wife's turmoil and lawsuit. People do fall out of love and discover others, it's just a fact of life. But I believe the account that Sinema heavily pursued him despite her knowing he was married. Sinema needs to suffer.

2

FunFunFun8 Mar 15, 2026 +2

Take Sinema for all she has

2

Fun-Grab-9337 Mar 15, 2026 +2

Only time I hear about this dumbass is when she is doing some fucked up shit. Why are they all like this.

2

Square_Cellist9838 Mar 15, 2026 +2

This woman claimed to be bisexual. Frankly it’s none of my business, but I find it interesting that there never was really any evidence that she was anything other than hetero. I think this wouldn’t matter much, but this seems to be a theme with her. Claim to be one thing and then her behavior indicates otherwise

2

HeartMelodic8572 Mar 15, 2026 +2

She's the worst! She should be banned from politics.

2

Longjumping-Salad484 Mar 15, 2026 +2

ah, the prestige of being a united states senator

2

No_Tone1704 Mar 15, 2026 +2

She always seemed like high maintenance drama. Dumb BLEEEEP

2

Pimpwerx Mar 15, 2026 +2

Today, we are all Team Ex Wife. Because you can't be worse than Sinema.

2

PurpleSailor Mar 15, 2026 +2

Lol, gosh she's dumb, the lawsuit is valid lady, pay up.

2

sayasta_ Mar 15, 2026 +2

NC is one of the only states to allows people to sue using an Alienation of Affection claim in court. I hope Sinema has pay, she already admitted to the affair.

2

badwolfdad Mar 15, 2026 +2

The only explanation to this chicks life that makes sense is absolutely one in a billion over the top aggressively good kitty cat.

2

GiveIt2MeBigDaddy Mar 14, 2026 +4

Fuckin c***. I hope her ex takes her for everything she has.

4

tyj0322 Mar 14, 2026 +9

Vote blue no matter who…… so dems can throw wrenches in Dem plans instead of republicans

9

khinzaw Mar 14, 2026 +18

If you have enough Democrats, you don't need to worry so much about the Conservadems. Public Healthcare was stopped by Joe Lieberman *and every Republican.*

18

Educational_Bend_941 Mar 14, 2026 +5

There's 25 democratic senators right behind people like sinema and manchin or whoever fits that mold now.They'll lose every vote by just one, but there are always enough turncoats to lose. You people not getting that is why we keep losing. It'll take 95 Dems before we pass anything of value because most of them are wolves in sheep's clothing plus they're all aipac stooges anyways

5

Sinema admits a romance with her security guard as she fights ex-wife’s lawsuit

💬 Send a Message

199 Comments