>First on LateNighter: Saturday Night Live UK has yet to air a single minute, but it has already solved a problem
it hasnt even aired yet, so it clearly hasnt done anything.
545
Putrid_Loquat_4357Mar 19, 2026
-304
It's also going to spectacularly face plant. Nobody here wants this.
-304
DPPGertnerMar 19, 2026
+59
Depends if it's any good. That said, Sky make a lot of shows and I have no idea who watches them. Never heard anyone talking about 'A League of their Own' or the Buzzcocks revival tbh.
59
FX114Mar 19, 2026
+20
I wrote up a whole post about the TV show adaptation of A League of Their Own, before i realized you were talking about a completely different show. So fair point, I guess.
20
ValleyFloydJamMar 19, 2026
+6
Love the Buzzcocks revival, Greg is great fun and no one was ever going to bring the heat from the old days so it's the next best thing.
6
NorysStorysMar 20, 2026
+9
I don’t think we’ll ever experience the chaos of the Amstel era of Buzzcocks again for better or worse but holy shit it was funny.
9
robot-raccoonMar 20, 2026
+3
I’ll never not laugh a bill Baily’s response to that towers of London knobhead
“You know what you are mate? /does wanker hand gesture”
“What? A hand?”
3
NorysStorysMar 20, 2026
+3
Wait? Sky revived Buzzcocks?
I’m just glad TLC revived Mock the Week.
3
Putrid_Loquat_4357Mar 19, 2026
-55
Even if it's good nobody will watch. Will probably limp on for a couple of seasons because of how c**** it is to make. A league of their own was huge when I was a teenager, not sure whether it's still being watched.
-55
osmlolMar 19, 2026
+39
You speak for all of the UK?
39
Putrid_Loquat_4357Mar 19, 2026
-106
Yeh actually I do.
-106
onthenerdysideMar 19, 2026
+22
I thought this was an autonomous collective.
22
AggabaggaMar 20, 2026
+3
You’re fooling yourself, mate, we’re living in a dictatorship!
3
HumerdinkPatchbottomMar 20, 2026
+2
That’s what you get when a lady in a lake is just handing out swords deciding who should be king.
2
So-Called_LunaticMar 19, 2026
+2
Prime Minister Putrid_Loquat is a torrey.
2
ValleyFloydJamMar 19, 2026
+3
What a f****** ridiculous thing to say, nobody wants a new sketch show?
It might work, it might not but it's just a comedy show.
3
cgknight1Mar 20, 2026
+2
>What a f****** ridiculous thing to say, nobody wants a new sketch show?
It's not nobody but being on Sky One on a saturday night, the answer in terms of live viewers is maybe 30,000?
2
ValleyFloydJamMar 20, 2026
+1
The chances are it fails because most things fail and good comedy is hard.
But that means they probably should bother making much, with on demand and clips, it could gain an audience.
1
cgknight1Mar 20, 2026
+1
So I'm not talking about success or failure - I'm just explaining the natural limits of the audience of a show on Sky One on a Saturday night at 10pm. Some shows go out to audiences as low as 6000.
You are just more likely to running into someone into dogging than someone who watched this live on saturday night.
1
ValleyFloydJamMar 20, 2026
+1
Guess it depends on who you hang out with.
1
cgknight1Mar 20, 2026
+1
The dogging bit is for effect but the UK population is about 75 million - so 30,000 is about 0.04 so sure you might know one person but the chances of you hanging out with significant amounts of the audience are well... do you really want the numbers?
1
altruisticnarcissistMar 19, 2026
+4
You should give it a chance, I've been trying to convince everyone with Sky or Now.TV to give it a shot. It's a great opportunity for ten new stand-ups and outside of panel shows comedy in the UK is dying on its feet. It's a miracle anyone green-lit this show.
4
JohnnyButtocksMar 19, 2026
-13
It’s going to be unbelievably bad and I can’t understand how this isn’t obvious to everyone.
-13
PocketNicksMar 19, 2026
+2
What are you claiming nobody wants, exactly? A UK version of SNL? or flexible runtimes? Because I want both of those things.
2
PlanetLandonMar 19, 2026
+1
You seem confident for someone who is talking out of their ass
1
BrowncoatdanMar 19, 2026
-52
You're getting downvoted but you're right.
Tina Fey being the first host just shows how out of touch it is. Tina Fey is amazing, but if someone is a fan of Tina Fey, they are alreadly likely a fan of SNL, or at least know of it. She's essentially famous for SNL. Sure that makes sense, but will it attract a larger mainstream audience? They have 1 chance to make a good first impression, and I can't see this being it.
Snl is pretty big over in the UK already, and how many of those fans watch the USA snl and think "man i wish we had a uk version"
The UK version should be completely different, akin to ant and decs Saturday night takeaway (obviously not that exactly) but it needs it's own uk identity. Uk comedy is unmatched, and there are so many talented uk comedians who can contribute, but it's likely going to just be a carbon copy of the usa show.
Hopefully I'm wrong, but i doubt it
-52
helendestroyMar 19, 2026
+29
> Snl is pretty big over in the UK already,
i can't express how much SNL is just not a thing in the UK.
29
BrowncoatdanMar 19, 2026
-30
Are you okay? It very much is a thing....
-30
R_110Mar 19, 2026
+19
As a Brit I have never once in my life heard anyone talk about SNL
19
PocketNicksMar 19, 2026
+1
I've heard plenty of people talk about it.
1
ValleyFloydJamMar 19, 2026
Maybe you just hang around dull people.
0
KieRanaRanMar 19, 2026
+17
I strongly disagree, it's not ever been a thing here.
17
BrowncoatdanMar 19, 2026
-23
Just because you don't keep up with pop culture, doesn't mean everyone else doesn't.
It's literally broadcast on uk tv.
-23
KieRanaRanMar 19, 2026
+23
LMAO, SNL is not UK pop culture just because you can see it on one of the hundreds of TV channels that exist
It's not part of our cultural TV landscape.
23
BrowncoatdanMar 19, 2026
-1
>It's not part of our cultural TV landscape.
Neither is stranger things, or joe rogan, or logan paul, or people opening pokemon card packs on youtube.
I don't think you understand what pop culture is.
-1
KieRanaRanMar 19, 2026
+7
What the hell does Pokémon card opening have to do with anything here?
I know what UK pop culture is and again, SNL isn't really relevant. That's not necessarily a bad thing, but I just don't know where you're getting this idea that SNL is some cornerstone of British TV that people are watching en-masse.
7
helendestroyMar 19, 2026
+6
where? i've never heard anyone talking about SNL in my life.
6
BrowncoatdanMar 19, 2026
+9
I have lived in the UK my whole life. I have watched snl for years. Its been broadcast on tv for years, and currently airs on sky comedy.
My friendship circles, my family, my colleagues, we all know about snl, sharing clips and often quote our favourite sketches.
Just because you have never heard anyone talking about snl, doesn't mean that people here don't know what it is....
9
helendestroyMar 19, 2026
+13
my family, my friends, my colleagues have never talked about it and couldn't quote anything.
people knowing what it is in your circle does not make it big.
13
FX114Mar 19, 2026
+6
>people knowing what it is in your circle does not make it big.
Although, by the same metric, people *not* knowing what it is in your circle doesn't make it small.
6
BrowncoatdanMar 19, 2026
+4
You said you've never heard anyone talk about it. I alone prove that wrong.
4
Ashrod63Mar 19, 2026
+2
Well I'm sure the 20 people that have Sky Comedy love it...
2
AshTheDead1teMar 19, 2026
+1
I honestly think being Tina Fey hosting is genius, you hopefully will get the UK viewers giving it a chance but having Fey host the first one you also might get some U.S viewers tuning to see the first show and who know maybe they will like the British humor and tune in again for the next episode etc….
1
SP0oONYMar 20, 2026
It seems like they are making SNL UK for the US audience to be honest. The preview was painfully unfunny and Tina Fey is pretty unknown in the UK. 30 Rock had no impact here and neither does SNL US.
0
[deleted]Mar 19, 2026
[deleted]
0
BrowncoatdanMar 19, 2026
>This isn't how creativity works.
Funny that you deem this cashgrab "creative"
0
[deleted]Mar 19, 2026
[deleted]
0
BrowncoatdanMar 19, 2026
+1
I explicitly said that I hope I'm wrong?
I don't want it to fail, but it will. That doesn't make me pessimistic, it's just being realistic.
>What about this could possibly inspire you to be such a d*** about it?
Where have I been a d***? You're the only one being abusive.
1
[deleted]Mar 19, 2026
+1
[deleted]
1
BrowncoatdanMar 19, 2026
+1
Yes. In response to you calling people idiots.
Again, what I said is not being a "d***"
1
[deleted]Mar 19, 2026
[deleted]
0
gntrrMar 19, 2026
+238
I don't think the problem with snl us is the not enough time.
238
tore_a_bore_aMar 19, 2026
+150
Some of my favorite skits have been the weird ones they try out at 12:50 AM
150
SmallLetterMar 19, 2026
+46
10 to 1 sketches are the best, especially if Will Forte was involved
46
gravteckMar 19, 2026
+21
Agreed, they do a lot of those weird "groups at a restaurant" gag that I'm down with. I also like to watch it with a running editorial in my head that is under the assumption that they had something half baked they would try to figure out.
21
Starfox-sfMar 19, 2026
+5
Debbie Downer
5
BYoungNYMar 20, 2026
+4
"by the way, it's official. I can't have children." Is still one of my absolute favorite lines from all of snl. The break of the entire cast in the at sketch, at a time where that was pretty rare, was by far the funniest thing to happen in that era of snl.
4
Icy-Sheepherder-6221Mar 20, 2026
+5
Wah waaah
5
bootymix96Mar 20, 2026
+8
Yep, completely agree, and sometimes even those out-there skits really take flight. Best example IMO is the series of P*** Stars skits, with Vanessa Bayer as Breckie and Cecily Strong as Breckie’s never-named friend selling high-end stuff like [Sebosski Cryssals](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNP143k11bU), [Lampertinis](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=llKJdbQ0cOc), [Moey Chambin Champagne](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zw4zlvTlaI0), and [Manual Blondick shoes](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9G3qtOUIpo). It started out with the Sebosski one, then took off from there, and each one was always the last skit of the night. (I saw the Sebosski one live when it premiered, and that is hands down the hardest I’ve ever laughed at an SNL skit!)
8
SparrowCrocodileMar 20, 2026
+2
that's still a problem of run time if the other 80 minutes aren't good. Technically Tim Robinson solved this by taking a lot of time to carefully craft fifteen minutes of sketch comedy in 90 minute bursts every couple of years.
Much as many reddit users seem to bemoan the loss of the 26 episode season, it's very difficult to make that many episodes with only a summer break and have it be good.
2
albanymetzMar 19, 2026
+1
They also cut skits for time, and sometimes release them years later. I think that's kind of the point.
1
crumble-beeMar 19, 2026
+49
As a fan of shorter form UK sketch comedy like the fast show and big train, my main issue with SNL is that while the initial skit idea might be funny, after a minute or two I’m like “cool, I get it” but then they just have another 4 minutes of it and it rarely gets better. It feels like they need to pad the sketches to fill time.
49
reddituser57428Mar 19, 2026
+33
Unfortunately they encourage this not to fill time but to limit the number of set changes required.
33
Complete_EntryMar 19, 2026
+12
I asked on the sub, it's for transitions between sketches and even they hate it.
12
call-nowMar 20, 2026
+5
I could go for the sets being less elaborate tbh
5
NorysStorysMar 20, 2026
+7
I think this is one of the biggest problems with a lot of ‘traditional’ American comedy over the last 15 years or so, they just don’t know how to end a skit. They go on for soo long.
7
BaBaFiCoMar 19, 2026
+3
God yes. It beats you over the head with the concept.
3
bootymix96Mar 20, 2026
+2
I’ve actually noticed the reverse with watching the original Channel 4 *Whose Line is it Anyway?* from the 80s/90s; compared to Drew Carey/Aisha Tyler on the US versions, Clive Anderson on the UK version can sometimes be a bit too quick on the buzzer with ending games/sketches IMO.
2
ValleyFloydJamMar 19, 2026
+1
I like the show, I kinda agree but the main issue tends to be lacking a good ending, they rarely go out on a high.
1
metametapraxisMar 21, 2026
+1
That’s always been my issue with SNL. Every sketch is beaten to death. It really has always needed tightening up to be funny to an international audience.
1
viscosity-breakdownMar 19, 2026
+2
They coulda saved a lot of money by just having a blank screen and an announcer going, "Picture a cat driving a car. Okay, now imagine an unfrozen caveman lawyer."
2
[deleted]Mar 19, 2026
-1
[deleted]
-1
RellenDMar 19, 2026
+1
That's a completely different show... Unless that's the joke
1
FunkytadualexhaustMar 19, 2026
+90
My first instinct was "oh, good they can end early if theres less quality skits"
90
godisanelectricoliveMar 19, 2026
+11
According to the article that’s exactly what they are doing. It still caps out at 90 minutes at most but can be as short as 60 minutes. Sky is estimating each episode will be around 75 minutes. Hopefully that means less padding.
11
drunkensoupMar 19, 2026
+21
That's what I was thinking too except "oh good, they don't have to have 5 minute skits repeating the same joke over and over"
21
G3neral_TsoMar 19, 2026
+4
Or if there is a good band or musical group on, give them another song
4
Asclepius-RodMar 19, 2026
+7
“Actually this week we couldn’t think of anything that good, gonna skip this week”
7
pass_nthruMar 19, 2026
+2
“why male models?”
2
Luci-NoirMar 19, 2026
+2
The problem with them running out of time to do their skits literally means they don’t have enough time.
2
juliankennedy23Mar 20, 2026
+1
I've never watched a full episode of Saturday Night Live and thought to myself you know that was way too short.
1
lostinthought15Mar 19, 2026
+47
Sometimes the best writer is a good editor. Time constraints can many times help tighten up the comedy.
I think there might be some unknown consequences. There are so many weird or unusual sketches that are put into the 10-to-1 s*** that I think wouldn’t get a shot of a longer or more complex sketch took that position. You have to wonder would something like Wayne’s World gotten cut in favor of a longer sketch at the time.or would some of the Kate and Addy cat sketches been cut for something longer or less weird.
47
godisanelectricoliveMar 19, 2026
+14
The article seems to be saying it will be flexible in the direction of less time instead of more time. Episodes can be as short as 60 minutes but 90 minutes is still the max.
I mean if that means faster pacing and fewer sketches that’s stretched out for time, then it’s potentially a very good for comedic timing.
14
sadr0botMar 19, 2026
-13
Nobody wants 60-90 minutes of that shit, this is going to go down like the Hindenburg over here.
-13
CoolBakedBeanMar 19, 2026
+2
the office super fan episodes have been interesting to me.
some episodes are better in the tighter 22 minute timeframe but others are better with more time.
i think the answer is it depends, cuz i think flexibility has its pros and cons
2
NoTitleChampMar 19, 2026
+10
Not waiting to see if the idea actually works? Alright then.
10
OutrageousPlay1650Mar 20, 2026
+1
necroreplying but yeah, i do not understand why everyone is getting in a tiff about a show coming on telly 😭
1
LiveFromNewYork95Mar 19, 2026
+23
Nah. I like that there's structure.
Plus it's a slippery slop: "Why does it have to end at 1?" turns to "Why does it have to start at 11:30?" turns to "Does it even need to be live?"
23
44problemsMar 19, 2026
+10
Yeah SNL is old fashioned TV at its best. Live, sets, house band, thrown together in a week.
I do wish other late night shows could just keep going when needed. Jon Stewart occasionally does that for a big interview. Old Nightline with Ted Koppel would do that, there's a famous live interview with the head of Scientology that stretched a 30 minute show to almost an hour and a half. Ted warns the affiliates that they will be running late, I think he knew no one would ever get that interview again, and he was right.
10
khz30Mar 19, 2026
+5
At the time that Ted made the statement, Nightline was live to tape and affiliates still had layers of staff for such a rare situation. Now you're lucky if there's one person babysitting the broadcast feed on-site, and most stations are now 100% automated following the 10/11PM newscast.
5
44problemsMar 19, 2026
+4
My local station always screws up during SNL. Recently it just went to commercial during the opening credits, came back partway through the monologue. Sometimes they forget to insert ads and I just get the NBC logo over and over for a minute or two.
4
khz30Mar 19, 2026
+2
Yeah, that usually means your station isn't properly programming the breaks for SNL. You should reach out through the contact form on their website, they have to take things like that seriously because it also impacts station and show ratings.
2
TheMooseIsBlueMar 19, 2026
-1
There’s precedent for sporting events and award shows and such using less structured timelines. This is worth a shot.
-1
HanifsefuMar 19, 2026
+6
No it's not. This isn't an award show where random shit happens and you need to wait for the crowd to simmer down. It's a sketch show where the vast majority of sketches will be forgotten before the show is even finished.
Nobody's bad sketch or stand-up routine would ever be fixed by letting it run an extra 5 minutes. It is only fixed with reworks and rewrites to make the joke actually happen. Letting it stew for extra time doesn't solve any issue, it just lets bad material run longer than it should because they couldn't be bothered to make it good.
6
TheMooseIsBlueMar 19, 2026
-2
The producers of this show seem to disagree.
-2
HanifsefuMar 20, 2026
+2
And the creators of Monty Python, the ones that basically invented the sketch show, disagree with those producers.
2
TheMooseIsBlueMar 20, 2026
-2
Monty Python wasn’t live (every time).
-2
AnalogWalrusMar 19, 2026
I like the live aspect, but it doesn’t always need to run 90 minutes. And other times great bits get cut for no reason and end up online (still waiting for that follow up Beavis sketch). But the structure could be a little more malleable. I’d say it could be cut to an hour most weeks but that would screw the musical guests. But it could be a varied amount of time from week to week depending on circumstances.
0
HanifsefuMar 19, 2026
+6
Limitations and constraints breed creativity. Letting everything run over just means more chaff that should have been reworked or cut makes it through and the quality goes down.
Guess what nobody has ever said about a bad joke? "Gee I think if they just kept at it for another 10 minutes they would have gotten there".
6
internetpointsaredumMar 20, 2026
+2
On the other hand, the "Cut for time" sketches are almost always funnier than what made it to air that week.
2
antftwxMar 19, 2026
+6
I'm looking forward to it. 🤷🏻♂️ Cast seems decent, Ania Magliano is hilarious. Then again, I'm not from the UK, so I'm not the demographic.
6
admiralvicMar 19, 2026
+8
I'm not really sure how this is a problem.
It isn't like SNL struggles with content. I suppose they could make even less skits, but it isn't like cutting more automatically means you're only left with the gold. At least I don't think SNL strictly airs whatever in any consistent manor.
As for going over, that's largely solved by just uploading it on social media. Given so many of those skits are the ones I prefer, I low key suspect they cut some of the better skits to get buzz via social media. I mean, they cut the third Davidson rap where they actually got Eminem to appear...
But that seems like a better approach than just letting the episode run long. Or, at least, I don't see the issue.
8
godisanelectricoliveMar 19, 2026
+3
The same number of sketches can be less padded and stretched out if they don’t have to hit the 90 minute mark every week. 90 minutes like in the US is still the limit but it looks like they are predicting they’ll go under for most episodes.
A lot of the time it feels like they keep sketches going longer than the premise warrants just for the sake of time.
3
admiralvicMar 19, 2026
+6
But isn't this dictated more by ad breaks, and the concept itself, than the run time?
6
godisanelectricoliveMar 19, 2026
I think there are also fewer ad breaks as well just because of different regulations so it’d be a different structure overall.
0
internetpointsaredumMar 20, 2026
+1
I'm pretty sure SNL would have an easier time coming in on schedule if they stopped encouraging the cast members to break every other episode.
1
Complete_EntryMar 19, 2026
-1
I find it funny how you view it as a pressure valve and I view it as "throw it on the scrapheap". Not saying you are wrong, just find your completely opposite take interesting.
-1
admiralvicMar 19, 2026
+1
I wouldn't really say I view it either way.
I just don't think removing skits automatically means we're left with quality, nor do I think there is a problem with some things getting cut for time because they're usually available if you care. Though I absolutely believe they sometimes let things that will do better on social media get cut.
1
UKbeardMar 19, 2026
+4
The runtime differences are misleading. SNL is 90min including commercials but is 69min without. The uk has less commercials per hour so that 75min runtime will be more like 63min so pretty close with SNL.
4
punarobMar 19, 2026
+7
They solved the longstanding SNL problem. So they made it actually funny?
7
sadr0botMar 19, 2026
+4
I still don't see how this sort of thing can be successful over here.
4
JaymiiMar 19, 2026
+9
A live sketch show with modern talent from UK? Why not?
9
sadr0botMar 19, 2026
+4
60-90 minutes of comedians doing sketches.. it's going to get ripped to bits over here
4
ValleyFloydJamMar 19, 2026
+6
Cos we've never liked sketch shows?
These things are always hit and miss.
6
SandysBurnerMar 20, 2026
+4
[It's what people expect.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OE_Glg85-60)
4
NoTitleChampMar 19, 2026
+6
British TV was dominanted by sketch shows as one point. I'm surprised it took this long to give it another try.
6
sadr0botMar 19, 2026
+4
Exactly, over twenty years ago and there hasn't been a successful one since.
4
ValleyFloydJamMar 19, 2026
Because they just stopped doing them, there would have been hits if they had been taking chances.
0
CrissBlissMar 19, 2026
+2
Why? British comedians rule.
2
sadr0botMar 19, 2026
It's the format, we haven't had a successful sketch show here since The Fast Show, Little Britain etc. Everything since then has been a massive failure so something as lame as the SNL format has no chance.
0
cgknight1Mar 20, 2026
+1
The last attempt at this was called em... The Ten'O'Clock show I think and bombed?
1
CrissBlissMar 19, 2026
+1
Well let’s see what they’ve got first before thinking the worst.
1
TheFrontierzmanMar 20, 2026
+1
Okay
1
Rlife145Mar 20, 2026
+1
Add a song from the musical guest
1
wishlist28Mar 20, 2026
+1
Q
1
sean2mushMar 20, 2026
+1
This is getting cancelled after one series.
1
stevenmass7Mar 21, 2026
+1
Can it not get aired ever please ??
1
bindersfull-ofwomenMar 19, 2026
-6
I didn’t even know SNL had a UK version.
Why don’t they just bring back Mad TV?
It’s a better format to just have a cast without the advertising gimmick and just have them critique and parody popular things at the time.
SNL just seems like “See my movie, buy my product, or listen to my album” these days
-6
PercentageDazzlingMar 19, 2026
+6
You probably haven't heard of the UK SNL because it hasn't actually aired yet. The premiere is this weekend.
The US SNL executives were involved in getting a UK version setup. Its probably not Mad TV because that's been off the air for a decade (really closer to two) there's no current production team to push for it. The IP rights might also be more complicated since they'd have to deal with whoever also owns the Mad Magazine rights now.
130 Comments