· 72 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 27, 2026 at 10:30 PM

Some US Tariff-Relief Deals Are Worthless, Canada’s Carney Tells CBC

Posted by Georgeika



🚩 Report this post

72 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
Novel-Lifeguard6491 19 hr ago +398
Carney calling certain relief deals worthless is essentially a public signal that Ottawa has figured out the asymmetry and isn't going to keep giving things away for symbolic wins that evaporate in the next news cycle.
398
Automatic-Avocado885 17 hr ago +58
I also think the Canadian government at this point see’s a weakened Trump who’s running the economy into the ground and started a global energy crisis that’s probably going to cause a global recession and they realize if they slow role this he losses more and more leverage by the month. He also can’t stomach a stock market dip so do you really think he’ll pull the 6 month clause to pull out of CUSMA.
58
Euclidisthebomb 13 hr ago +29
Trump can't get CUSMA cancellation past Congress anyways. Or he would have tried some time ago. It was only as short while ago the Senate voted against Trump's tariffs on Canada. A new poll out of America found more Americans trust the Canadian negotiators and positions on CUSMA then that of their own government. Carney has big credibility among American business leadership. He is a proven commodity in the thick of things 3x now including the current day. I am not suggesting it is all apple pie and ice cream for Canada. Trump is going to be disruptive until he steps into the grave or reaches end of term, which ever comes first, even if he loses Congress in the mid terms. His current strategy is pronounce executive orders no matter the legality and make those opposed have to exercise the long arduous legal course to stop them, always gambling that his stacked Supreme Court may throw him a bone.
29
ThatsItImOverThis 12 hr ago +5
“Get it past Congress”….heh.
5
lennydsat62 17 hr ago +143
Can you imagine PP at the helm. He’d be on his knees faster than trump would be able to pull his diaper off…
143
Cloudhead_Denny 17 hr ago +71
If PP had won, we'd already be in a situation where Alberta was a US state , being used to further drive a wedge into Canadian territories. And a full-on takeover shortly there after...with a smile.
71
Rufhinator 17 hr ago +58
It’s crazy that the cons are out full force with anti liberal ads right now just complaining. No answers to their problems, no solutions just “omg prices are higher”. If I did this in a business I’d be fired the next day.
58
lennydsat62 17 hr ago +33
Agreed. Every f****** time i hear PP he’s complaining (including today). Listen, i get what he’s there to do, i truly do, but in these times maybe work together with Carney. We need every little bit these days.
33
Yvaelle 14 hr ago +15
Ideally in the westminister system, the opposition is supposed to be getting wonky as shit, digging into he weeds and creating a laundry list of specifics they would have done better - with all the benefit of hindsight and unconstrained by realpolitik. The outcome is supposed to be that they accumulate enough, "we would have done this 5% better", that they accumulate a critical mass in the next election, on the promise to implement a hundred 5% iterative improvements to the previous government. That's the dream. PP hasn't contributed an original thought, or even stolen a 5% improvement in his entire career politician life.
15
sharp11flat13 9 hr ago +1
Finally, someone who understands the functional purpose of His Majesty’s Loyal Opposition in our system of government. Thank you.
1
Which_Exam902 12 hr ago +2
Maybe focus on the people in power instead. if I had a dollar for every comment on the opposition party doing its job, instead of why isn't the current government doing its job, I'd be a millionaire.
2
urgerestraint 15 hr ago +6
They wouldn’t do it if it didn’t work so damn well on their rube voters.
6
RegularGuyAtHome 16 hr ago +14
Nah, having lived through the Liberals to Conservative to Liberals federal government transition from the mid 2000s to mid 2010s, if PP were prime minister Alberta “would be getting a fair deal from Ottawa” starting the day he was sworn in regardless of what he actually did or didn’t do for Alberta. It’s all about conservatives in power here, the provincial government can’t start trashing another conservative government. That just wouldn’t work. Notice that it’s all smiles (or just ignored completely) when talking about Saskatchewan or Ontario here in Alberta, but the focus is on BC because it’s the NDP running the show.
14
mvschynd 17 hr ago +4
That would have been funny for one reason, PP would have had to then take yet another elected MPs seat because he would have lost his again.
4
D0ntEatPaper 16 hr ago +2
*gag* brb need some bleach for my brain. (Also yes holy f***, that would have been a clusterfuck)
2
BlazinAzn38 16 hr ago +14
I’m glad foreign leadership is starting to actually call his BS. He’s so weak that he actually can’t handle people standing up to him
14
OkFix4074 18 hr ago +309
“A lot of countries rushed into deals with the US. They weren’t really worth the paper they were written on,” Carney told. Damn he is dropping truth bombs left and right !
309
canguy2017 17 hr ago +28
Ya you gotta get his new social media platform he just released. TRUTHBOMB! Goose’s Revenge
28
Hartia 17 hr ago +10
Mark My Words social
10
Darryl_444 17 hr ago +54
Trump is a lying b****. His deals are garbage.
54
CipherWeaver 18 hr ago +39
At this point everyone is waiting to see the results of the US midterms. If congress takes back its power from the presidency, this whole fiasco will get a lot less troublesome by itself.
39
Themeloncalling 17 hr ago +15
C**** Canadian energy and raw materials tow the line for America's economy. Tariffs do nothing but strangle America's golden goose and send it into the hands of competitors as Canada continues to diversify trade.
15
DecembersDragons 18 hr ago +58
The concept was simple. Increase tariffs modestly to encourage domestic manufacturing. Trade a little Ricardian advantage for economic balance.  Trump turned it into a three ring circus. 
58
Severesa 18 hr ago +65
My understanding of how a tariff should be enacted (On something not readily producible locally) is something along the lines of: * We don't want to rely on \[FOREIGN ENTERPRISE\] for \[PRODUCT\], we want to produce it locally. * We don't currently have the manufacturing infrastructure to immediately take on full production, therefore we need to give ourselves some time to set it up. * We calculate that full manufacturing capability will be established in 2 years time, therefore we will not implement tariffs until that time, in which we will set it at 25%. * We will tell our citizens about this so if they have any contractual obligations in place, they have 2 years to ensure cancellation of their deals for that time period (to reduce their contract break losses), and time it perfectly with local manufacturing starting. * This will encourage our citizens to purchase locally now that production is ready, and discourage them from buying foreign as it is now expensive. Or something along the lines of that. If you immediately kick a tariff in when local production isn't ready, or your citizens have contracts in place with foreign enterprises, all you are doing is making things more expensive for them and harming them economically.
65
Entegy 18 hr ago +34
Yes that would make sense.... _if_ you can domestically produce the goods in question.
34
Severesa 18 hr ago +36
Yep - I read somewhere or maybe heard a senator talk about it - Tariffs on bananas. It was something about how USA did not have the climate to grow bananas, so tariffing them is just pure needless economic punishment.
36
polkarooo 18 hr ago +22
I mean it's one banana, Michael, what could it cost? $10?
22
BadmiralHarryKim 15 hr ago +4
Did the country producing the banana trigger an orange crybaby? If so, then yes, it could indeed cost $10 now. (but there is always money in the banana stand so it will probably balance out)
4
Objective_Month_1128 10 hr ago +1
And it was considered viable because there is a small strip in the US where bananas can actually be grown. Never mind that current US production is already basically at maximum viability in the places where they are grown. They only need to be 1% right for the cult to feel like they won.
1
mvschynd 17 hr ago +21
Which is why Canadas retaliatory tariffs were great and effective. It was in stuff we had equivalents to, mostly luxury goods, not staples and that targeted republican states.
21
Journeydriven 17 hr ago +3
Or at the very least reasonably source from another allied country at a lower than tarrif price. Nah let's tarrif everything from everyone instead surely that won't hurt anyone
3
big_trike 16 hr ago +5
With as strong as the relationship used to be with Canada, was there any real difference in producing goods there vs in the US? There’s plenty of rail and highways, so lead times were low.
5
Entegy 16 hr ago +3
We do have resources the US doesn't. I'm not gonna try to claim to be an international trade expert to try and detail everything out though.
3
ottawadeveloper 16 hr ago +4
You can produce secondary market goods locally, if you're willing to pay enough. The tariffs have to be high enough that buying American is more attractive. Like if Korea can make a car for $15,000 and a similar American one is $20,000, you'd need tariffs around 33% on Korean automobiles (actually maybe slightly less because demand for cars will fall with the price increase) just for them to be competitive. And that assumes American cars are as good as Korean cars when you're done. Note that, as a consumer, you get hosed. Your car might be made in America now and you might have gotten a new job at the Ford plant, but you're paying 33% more for you car (but more of that money stays in America).  Something's though America just can't make - like I don't think they have economically viable potash deposits if I remember right. So tariffs on goods you can't produce is insane. The other downside is that other countries then don't like your tariffs. If you switch to domestic manufacturing of cars with heavy tariffs on Canadian cars, why would Canada keep giving you preferred access to potash when you impact their workers? And why would they buy American cars when they can buy them from Korea for much cheaper. You boost your domestic market and independence in exchange for a hit to your exports, higher consumer prices, and potentially a hit to your importa as well. Sometimes it's worth it. Sometimes it's not. It's never simple or free. If it was cheaper to manufacture them domestically, it would already be happening. That US tariffs comes at a time when they're also pissed about taxation on digital services is hilarious. The idea of globalization is that countries specialize in certain goods and services. The US is a major specialist in entertainment and the shift to streaming services has moved even more of the profits to American companies. Imagine selling a DVD of Star Wars IV in Canada. The money spent goes to pay workers at Best Buy, pay rent on a Canadian store, expansions in Canada, etc. Some goes back to the manufacturer of the DVD wherever they are, and some goes to the license holder. If you sell digital access to Star Wars IV on Apple TV, all of that profit goes to Apple and to the license holder, plus whomever maintains the Apple data centre. All of those are in America now, so none of the profits stay in your country (in fact, major companies will shift it around to a place where they get a good tax rate). So none of your money stays in Canada (except the sales tax now) the only one who benefits are the ISPs who can sell bigger plans. The US therefore racks up a huge poorly tracked trade deficit on digital services then complains about trade deficits with other countries who export physical goods. 
4
razdolbajster 11 hr ago +1
\> Something's though America just can't make Grow bananas.
1
ottawadeveloper 8 hr ago +1
A great example. The raw materials industry is where you're going to face the biggest challenges in building a domestic market. Building a viable secondary industry can require importing whatever goods you don't have locally. There's a reason economists recommend free trade
1
sharp11flat13 9 hr ago +1
> if you can domestically produce the goods in question America will never be able to replace manufactured imports with domestic products unless their citizens are willing to lower their standard of living and accept decreased wages, or they can stomach paying more for everything than the rest of the world. It’s a pipe dream. Trump and his supporters are still thinking they can bring back their post-WWII economy. It will never happen. They are living in the middle of the last century. The rest of us have moved on. 🇨🇦
1
TyrialFrost 18 hr ago +3
The other option to reduce disruption is to slowly ease the tarifs after telegraphing that they will be put in place in X time. rather then sudden jumps of more then 5%.
3
biscuitarse 16 hr ago +2
> We calculate that full manufacturing capability will be established in 2 years time, therefore we will not implement tariffs until that time, in which we will set it at 25%. The problem with this is that once the tariff is set at 25%, the American companies that get a huge price advantage will then set their prices just below that 25% price threshold and still have the lower price. And of course, that jacked-up price is sent on to the consumer.
2
Severesa 16 hr ago +2
A very fair call and definitely something I could see that happening. A frustrating situation none the less!
2
Goldenface007 15 hr ago +1
> Or something along the lines of that. So like a concept of a plan?
1
Severesa 15 hr ago +1
I say that because I am not an economist. I am just a guy who read about tariffs and how they work - Hence my approximations. If you have some additional things you would like to throw in or sources I could read from, please let me know. I am always happen to sponge knowledge from others!
1
TinyFugue 15 hr ago +3
Trump is a bully. He views tariffs as a club.
3
Moist-Fortune6277 16 hr ago +8
I think Carney had enough of Trump's BS.
8
SnuffleWarrior 14 hr ago +8
Comments like this are indicative of what's emanating out of the entire G7. The West has had enough of Trump and the US. For Canada, Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Spain to be as blunt as they've been recently shows patience has run out.
8
demonfoo 19 hr ago +14
Hahahaha... "some", he says.
14
Crabby_Monkey 13 hr ago +8
He has leverage right now to speak more freely and hold out for a better deal. The article mentions the Canada exports a lot of oil, fertilizer, and aluminum to the US. All of those are approaching, or already in, global shortages due to Trumps action in Iran. Canada knows that the US can’t afford to play hardball on those items, especially fertilizer and aluminum, or it risks making the coming recession worse than it will be. Plus they know TACO not only stands for Trump Always Chickens out but Trump Always Cheats Others. He has proven over and over again that he reneges on deals. If the other party gets a reasonable deal Trump feels “taken advantage of” even if he negotiated it. If thy don’t the he sees them as weak and thinks he can push the other party around. Either way he’s going to try to change the terms after the fact.
8
sharp11flat13 9 hr ago +2
> Trump Always Cheats Others. Excellent. I can’t believe I hadn’t already thought of this.
2
HotHits630 17 hr ago +18
PP already has a presser lined up tomorrow to denounce Carbon Tax Carney, Brookfield, Bring It Home, and whatever shit slogan comes to his hollow head.
18
Conscious_Candle2598 16 hr ago +11
amazing that guy still has a Job, TBH Lost the easiest election ever. Lost his riding. lost his supporters. lost his cabinet ministers. like, Man, At what point does that party and PP read the f****** room. step down already.
11
graison 16 hr ago +6
Didn't he pass a leadership review a month ago?
6
Conscious_Candle2598 14 hr ago +5
somehow 
5
Mrkillz4c00kiez 14 hr ago +4
That cost 1000 a head and had to be in person to vote
4
clycoman 12 hr ago +2
Tells you alot about the state of Conservative party leadership candidates that he passed the review...
2
sharp11flat13 9 hr ago +1
> Didn't he pass a leadership review a month ago? Yes. And it was rigged to ensure his continuance, much to the dismay of real Canadian conservatives. Thank you Peter MacKay.
1
sfogler 15 hr ago +2
I just don't think they have anyone better. I think his party knows PP can't win an election but their next in lines are too deep in the same ideology so they wouldn't win either. Like his second in command is that Melissa lady. Her chances of winning are even more cooked than PP's.
2
graison 14 hr ago
They have to go even father to the right! What could go wrong?
0
Rock-Ski-Golf-Repeat 14 hr ago +4
I sure wish the US had a leader like Carney, someone who can be flexible and negotiate to put his country first.
4
DBZFIGHTERS 18 hr ago +11
It is crazy how it took a madman like Trump to force countries into distancing themselves from the USA.
11
TheRC135 16 hr ago +18
Cooperation with the US was a good thing when the US was interested in cooperation. America electing wildly incompetent clowns who treat international trade and diplomacy like an extortion racket changed the game.
18
asdhjasdhlkjashdhgf 18 hr ago +3
well most would not abandon their grandfather when he suddenly points at clouds, you'd know once a day he will sleep and calms down, keep medicine at hand and only intervene when he starts beating children. Thats strategic distancing to keep someone's dignity. If that turns out to fail you might call for help to place him in retirement home with 24h special service - expensive - but at least you can sleep and be sure he is well and nobody gets hurt.
3
sharp11flat13 9 hr ago +1
American hegemony post-WWII was carefully constructed to make and keep the US the world’s sole superpower. And Trump has just thrown it all away to keep trans people from peeing and playing sports.
1
LDSBS 13 hr ago +3
Any attempt at an agreement with Trump is worthless because he will disregard it any time he wants. 
3
Substantial_Milk8170 16 hr ago +2
A 'deal' is completely worthless if the bureaucratic fine print makes the relief practically impossible to actually claim.
2
iamwearingashirt 10 hr ago +1
Game theory. Repeated backstabbing loses every time. Trump's bullshit might work once or twice. But when deals are constantly broken, what's the point of signing them.
1
wjames0394 16 hr ago -1
CDN companies are not going to see a dime. Stand strong.
-1
Prestigious_Sky_5155 11 hr ago -2
Kind of like you huh Carney?
-2
kkZZZ 18 hr ago -48
Even so, why keep doing it in public like this, you know who you're dealing with.  Canada is in a dire state, we can't just replace the US overnight. I think it's prudent to.domso considering so many Canadians livelihood is at stake.
-48
gwan_wit_cha_by 18 hr ago +30
A bad deal will not bring jobs to Canada.
30
kkZZZ 14 hr ago -7
not talking about taking a bad deal. This is purely for Carney's ego, antagonizing someone who cares about this public shit isnt a smart strategy. 
-7
sportow 18 hr ago +19
CUSMA has ten more years if countries don’t sign on to an extension. No need to panic or take a bad deal or deal with a bad faith administration… Stay cool, Canada. You’ve still got the best deal…
19
turtle-berry 17 hr ago +11
Well, there’s no need to replace the US overnight. Cross-border trade is in zero danger of disappearing overnight.
11
← Back to Board