· 61 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 18, 2026 at 7:29 PM

South Korea’s favorability toward Japan exceeded 50% for the first time since the survey started being held in fiscal 2014. The favorability rate reached 56.4%, an increase of 15.8 points from the previous survey.

Posted by West-Sector-5495



🚩 Report this post

61 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
YJeezy 22 hr ago +57
As the older population dies, this should go up
57
Trying2improvemyself 22 hr ago -32
What about as the older population inhabits mech suits?
-32
Nyaos 22 hr ago +36
Younger people in Korea don’t have nearly the same animosity towards Japan as the older generation… no surprise there. They also both have a mutual dislike of China. My partner is Korean, and I’ve learned a lot of interesting things about this sort of thing through her. She told me that old people will give you bad looks if you pick up a bowl to eat rice out of it or to drink a soup, which is the Japanese style. Young people don’t care about this sort of thing at all.
36
Karlendor 16 hr ago +6
My confusion when I learned dead people place their bowl of rice on the right side. And Samm lettuce wrap everything.  Good culture thought. Love Jimm Dakk. Steamed soy sauce chicken my beloved
6
[deleted] 20 hr ago -3
[deleted]
-3
Nyaos 20 hr ago +17
Haha I meant like the Korean way is leaving it on the table and using the utensil only, versus the Japanese style of bringing the bowl up to your mouth.
17
Brave_Suggestion945 18 hr ago +7
Koreans uniquely use spoons. It's against traditional Korean table manners to lift bowls up from the table like they do in Japan and China.
7
CyanConatus 22 hr ago +14
Time heals all wounds. Given that you don't do anything to rip the scab off
14
RexLatro 21 hr ago +24
I would think its less of a "time healing wounds" and more of a "Well shit...China, the US, or Japan? Which one will screw us over the least?" type situation
24
West-Sector-5495 19 hr ago +8
Well one thing is that Koreans are like number 1 visitors of Japan and also number 1 consumers of their culture. They even made a funny meme on the hypocrisy of “NO Japan”
8
RexLatro 18 hr ago +7
I would say it tends to happen when you can hop a quick ferry from Korea to Japan and make a day trip out of it. As a Canadian, I'm not particularly a fan of the US or how they treat my home (even before Trump). At the same time, despite many Canadians boycotting travel to the US I would still be unsurprised if Canada/Mexico were still the number one vistor/consumers of the US. You can harbour dislike for a country while still hopping over once in a while for c**** vacations
7
GlumNeedleworker1199 12 hr ago +1
that's why some Koreans make jokes on the hypocrisy of Koreans
1
CyanConatus 12 hr ago +1
True. I also saw another comment mentioning that there's more travel between the two and there's a cultural exchange online. It's probably a mix of a bunch of things like these. Healing, cultural exchange and like you said straight up pragmatic take the power that most align with your ideals. All compound to a quickly improving relationship
1
officerboba 16 hr ago +6
Just take a flight from Korea to Japan or vice versa… So many people here are trying to force Korea to hate Japan even though they’re not even Korean lol
6
IllustriousMost5243 8 hr ago +1
By the way, ygz123 here is a resident of the Chinese sub.
1
TubeframeMR2 22 hr ago +11
Trump The Uniter is going to be my go to name for my next garage band.
11
CaRzOonn 22 hr ago +4
Interesting how quickly public opinion can shift depending on political and economic relations.
4
ModernirsmEnjoyer 10 hr ago +1
There haven't been as much deliberately flame setting to the issue for domestic voters recently. As the world enters the period of geopolitical rivalry, politicians on both sides realize they need each other not as caricatures to punch against in the domestic political theatre, but as partners against the triple and coordinated threats (but not necessarily allied!) from China, North Korea, and Russia. This is why, despite having left-nationalist government in Seoul and the right-nationalist government in Tokyo, which is otherwise a recipe for confrontation, are doing generally fine despite some problems and inertia on the unresolved issues. Note: the left in South Korea (and by extension North Korea) is traditionally ethnically nationalist and anti-Japan alongside being economically and socially progressive. This makes an interesting situation, because the South Korean right, which is civic nationalist, has better attitude to migration, though recently they pivoted to aggressive anti-China stance.
1
CaRzOonn 10 hr ago +1
Makes sense, there’s a lot more going on behind the scenes than people realize.
1
greyeye77 20 hr ago +3
Japan and Korea both make political news/demand to irritate each other every few years, because of **predictable friction from unresolved post-colonial settlement issues**. The focus has shifted a bit since COVID. It's always the same. Dokdo/Takeshima, Yasukuni, War Crime/Compensation. Both countries want different outcomes, and it is very difficult to finalize, and it can/will flare up again and again.
3
Alert-Algae-6674 20 hr ago +3
Japan could have made reconciliation a lot quicker and earlier if they did more to teach about and acknowledge their WW2 actions. I think it is their own fault for prolonging this issue. Notice how no European country in several decades has bad relations against Germany over their WW2 actions. Israel doesn’t even have bad relations against Germany. Is it just because Western countries are naturally more forgiving than Asian countries? Probably not If Japan had handled the issue as Germany did, probably there is no reason they and South Korea would still have tensions today
3
ModernirsmEnjoyer 10 hr ago +1
Japan does teach about war crimes, numerous public figures have apologized and the issue South Korea took was that this was done at Prime Minister and not parliament level (parliament passing resolution to apologize), and Japan post-war pacifism has been direct result of the experiences in the war, including what Japanese militarism itself produced. Foreign reporting misrepresents a small vocal minority on active but limited campaign to reshape education with a silent majority and less visible liberal and left leaning organizations that resist them being largely not covered. The problem is that Western reporting focuses too much on Tokyo, elite institutions, and certain expensive hotels rather than the reality on the ground, so the nationalist right (who are supported by pro-US security oriented conservative factions within elite society) gets more attention than they would otherwise have, and there is little actual visibility of Japanese society beyond entertainment export and some select reporting.
1
Carmypug 9 hr ago +1
Then why is the Japanese govt trying to block a Korean statue acknowledging comfort women being placed in New Zealand?
1
West-Sector-5495 9 hr ago +1
Depends on which cabinet
1
Carmypug 8 hr ago +1
It’s been pretty widespread for many years so I doubt it’s only one govt that targets this.
1
fakethrow456away 12 hr ago -1
I'm curious if the recent twitter changes will reverse the poll for this exact reason. Seems like people are finding out that there are actually quite a few Japanese revisionists online who are refuting Japan's war crimes.
-1
GlumNeedleworker1199 12 hr ago +4
TWITTER is your source?
4
ygz123 11 hr ago
In fact, almost all Japanese young people use X, higher than in any other country.
0
GlumNeedleworker1199 11 hr ago +3
ive been a thorough member of jp twitter and most of them Just talk about stuffs they like and don't care about things outside of their daily lives. those revisionism insee are mostly under news stuffs from accounts who talk about it all the time and other bot like accounts
3
ygz123 11 hr ago
“under news stuffs ”Isn't it just the best shelter for their revisionism? If they know that a considerable portion of society is heading toward extremism, shouldn't they come out to oppose it? This is the approach of a democratic country. In fact, very few young Japanese know about their country's atrocities during World War II, unlike their German peers. Japan doesn't even have a de facto left-wing party (even the Japanese Communist Party). Japan's left-wing parties would probably be considered center-right parties in Europe.
0
GlumNeedleworker1199 11 hr ago +1
unless they pass a law that bans online revisionism though that might get into trouble with the constitution of Japan. though the government has fired people who had made revisionism stuffs in the past under the excuse that their words don't represent the government stance (that it happened). now are you asking for a more thorough ban on revisionism that includes online and government sectors? \> Japan doesn't even have a de facto left-wing party (even the Japanese Communist Party). Reiwa is pretty left wing
1
ygz123 11 hr ago
\^\_\^ It is now 2026, not 令和, and the Prime Minister is 高市早苗, who has made multiple visits to Yasukuni Shrine. The far-right political party, 参政党 sanseito, is able to secure many seats in the parliament. Everything indicates that Japan's shift to the right is more direct than in other countries.
0
GlumNeedleworker1199 10 hr ago +2
german afd is pretty right wing and they won in the parliament. that's probably worse don't you think?
2
ygz123 10 hr ago +1
Let's discuss when Weidel becomes PM of Germany; at least, it's impossible right now.
1
Dense-Active-648 8 hr ago +1
>The far-right political party, 参政党 sanseito, is able to secure many seats in the parliament FYI 30/713
1
ygz123 11 hr ago -4
quite a few?As a Chinese person who studied in Japan, I believe that over 90% of Japanese people are historical revisionists; they just mostly respond with "I don't care" during interviews or polls, which is the best tacit approval of the ultra-right wing in the new era
-4
GlumNeedleworker1199 11 hr ago +3
ive been on douyin and bilibili and see a lot of anti jp, kr and other content. should I also assume majority chinese hate them.....? well that just might be the case
3
ygz123 11 hr ago +2
Isn't it reasonable for China to have anti-Japanese content? If Germans also enthusiastically commemorate Hitler every day, I believe Europeans would also be anti-German. As for Korea, it's mainly a matter of mutual disdain;Right-wing groups in South Korea also frequently spread rumors about China. it's not really anti-Korean.
2
GlumNeedleworker1199 11 hr ago +1
the thing is I see more anti korean stuffs on douyin and bilibili more than anti Japan stuffs. and even at that i think 1950 germany was less hated by its neighbours more than douyin has hatred for the both east asian countries.
1
chaos0xomega 21 hr ago +2
Ive noticed an increasing number of my favorite japanese restaurant are owned and operated by south koreans, so this seems to check out (This is meant as a joke)
2
imminentjogger5 22 hr ago +2
The younger population has no recollection of the war, denial of war time atrocities, and the many invasions during previous eras.
2
Colbert2020 20 hr ago +5
It's crazy how sheltered people like you are from the rampant racism of east Asia. It is centuries old. You can blame recent wars on their current grudges, but they'd find other reasons to hate one another absent that.
5
West-Sector-5495 21 hr ago +3
You haven’t seen Korean schools bruh. Also Japan and Korea only really have been conflict 1 time before modern times. (Hideyoshi invasion)
3
Potential-Formal8699 16 hr ago +9
Well, China and Japan only really have exactly one conflict (Imjin War) before modern times so…
9
andrewk1219 12 hr ago +3
Uh no. I can def recall like 5 conflicts between Japan and Korea b4 modern times and there are records of Japanese pirates pillaging korean seaside towns on our records - since I only vaguely know Japanese history i can't say much about their version of the story but I can definitely guarantee you that there were previous conflicts, just not full blown war
3
West-Sector-5495 12 hr ago +1
Most of the those Japanese pirates are Chinese. But no official war between Korea vs Japan until imjin. Unless you want to add the mongol invasion of Japan which the king of goryeo gave a lot of soldiers for
1
andrewk1219 12 hr ago +2
Dunno what you're sniffing but there's a word for Japanese pirates in Korean(which is now used to attack the conservative party) and writings and recording of history explicitly mentions that word a lot so not Chinese lol. In the joseon dynasty kr attacked tsushima island Way before that, it is presumed that baekjae and japan formed an alliance, each participating on its allies wars Idk where the heck you learned history, but imo the teacher must've been terrible
2
West-Sector-5495 12 hr ago -2
Wukou by the 16th century, especially during the Ming dynasty’s Jiajing era, the majority were Chinese smugglers, bandits, and outlaws and the History of Ming (Ming Shi) states that in a 1555 wokou raiding party, only 30% were ethnic Japanese while 70% were Han Chinese. Joseon attacking Tsushima really isn’t a full on war and Baekje Japan vs silla wars are kinda not between Japan vs Korea but respective dynasties. After all Baekje is Korean too. Learn history bro
-2
andrewk1219 11 hr ago +1
>Baekje Japan vs silla wars are kinda not between Japan vs Korea but respective dynasties. But some sort of conflict did happen between Japan and korean dynasties am I not right? >Wukou by the 16th century Before the 16th century they were primary Japanese, taking information out of context isn't really a good strategy for internet debates. Also >isn’t a full on war Think you used the words "conflicts" in your previous comments. I would really appreciate it if you were a bit more consistent in your wording Learn English Bro
1
West-Sector-5495 11 hr ago
> But some sort of conflict did happen between Japan and korean dynasties am I not right? But it doesn’t mean there was a Korea vs Japan war. That’s the point. Baekje vs Silla wars happened among themselves. The major battle in which Japan was even involved happened because Baekje was getting ganged on and asked for help. Historians note that there no incentive to Japan to even help Baekje here. > Before the 16th century they were primary Japanese, taking information out of context isn't really a good strategy for internet debates. Also Only in 13 and 14th century could you say the wukou were atleast majority Japanese (although by the 14th century there were already a huge Chinese and somewhat huge Korean population in these pirates). Around 15th century in Chinese records we see the majority being Chinese and later rest are Chinese. Plus it’s not like these wukou pirates were some state fashioned thing. Domains were trying to get rid of piracy too. > Think you used the words "conflicts" in your previous comments. I would really appreciate it if you were a bit more consistent in your wording I said conflict between Korea and Japan. Silla is not Korea. The wukou pirates were their own thing and not sponsored by Japan’s central state government and operating as independent or semi-autonomous groups amid periods of weak authority. So a “conflict” between Japan and Korea would be say the imjin war where the respective governments fought with one another
0
andrewk1219 11 hr ago +1
To cut to the point, where we differ in our view is about whether conflicts refer to full blown war or small conflicts, often not state-sponsored. So you go your way, and I'll go my way. >Silla is not Korea Also, wtf
1
West-Sector-5495 11 hr ago +1
I meant more like yknow serious stuffs between two official states. Minor stuffs are bound to happen Because back in that time Silla didn’t consider itself Korea. Balhae, gogoreyo, Silla, Baekje are all their own thing.
1
ygz123 11 hr ago +1
It simply shows that people all over the world are easily brainwashed; one presidential term is enough
1
championchilli 8 hr ago +1
My wife is a millennial Japanese and she adores Korean pop, food, and culture. There's certainly a sharing of pop culture between the two countries with this age group.
1
randomrreeddddiitt 21 hr ago -3
It's primarily because South Korea has essentially caught up to Japan in nearly every regard, and surpassing it in others. There is no longer an inferiority complex, nor a sense that Japan is capable of inflicting existential harm anymore. It would be something similar to if Canada rose to become an economic rival to the US, a military equal or superior to the US, and a soft power peer to the US. Canadians would probably feel much more relaxed toward the US than they do today. Add to this, the actual gigantic economic and military power with an imperial history right next door.
-3
deeperintomovie 12 hr ago +2
This is the dumbest comment I've read all week. So when Korea and Japan has animosity towards China like now, that's inferiority complex, got it.
2
randomrreeddddiitt 11 hr ago +1
Cheers, mate.
1
GlumNeedleworker1199 21 hr ago
\> South Korea has essentially caught up to Japan in nearly every regard, and surpassing it in others. lmao I wouldn't say that.
0
Unicornoftheseas 20 hr ago -1
They surpassed them in depressive work cultures and suicide rates. They have mirrored the a higher quite well in most regards.
-1
randomrreeddddiitt 17 hr ago +1
To the commenter asking about Japan's war crimes in Korea, I don't know if your comment was deleted or I can no longer see it for another reason, but here was my attempted reply: The colonization of Korea, I feel, goes without saying. But in the post-colonial era, much of the bitter and hostile feelings Korea has toward Japan was Korea's inability to exert influence over Japan directly or through the international stage. Korea remained under successive military dictatorships, while dealing with an antagonistic North Korea, while watching as Japan rose over four decades to become the second largest economy in the world. Japan was both celebrated on the world stage, while also being feared for its economic might. Because of Japanese strength, Korea had to suffer what it perceived as continuous humiliations from Japan. But since the 1990s, as Japan began its three decades-long stagnation, and as South Korea emerged from military dictatorship, and began its rise, things have leveled out drastically between the two countries. For example, South Korea recently overtook Japan on GDP per capita, which would have been unimaginable decades ago. Militarily, for good reason, South Korea's is more robust, while also having one of the world's largest arms industries. For soft power, an argument can be made for either. All of this is to say that in the minds of South Koreans, Japan is no longer the big, evil, scary monster that comes out when the lights go out. It is now just a peer country that's c**** to visit for a weekend trip. It's much easier to have favorable feelings when a formerly hostile country no longer looms so large over you.
1
YLCZ 17 hr ago -5
I’d call it the Ohtani effect. He makes Asians look good and that would make the Koreans feel more positive towards the Japanese ETA: As a Japanese American, I'm curious why this is being downvoted. I know Korean culture became more popular in Japan due to K-Dramas and K-Pop. Does the success of Ohtani and Yamamoto in baseball really have no effect? And maybe I didn't word it the best, but I think he's a positive representation of Asians. I'm a huge sports fan, so maybe it means nothing, but that's what I thought of when I saw such a sudden shift in popularity. Maybe there's some political event that caused that shift that I know nothing about as an American.
-5
← Back to Board