no seremos cómplices de una matanza para tapar el hecho de que el presidente de USSA es un pedófilo
64
Hagelslag_69Mar 31, 2026
+1
Geen flauw idee wat je schrijft maar ik denk dat ik het er mee eens ben
1
ZeroZeroZe77e7eMar 30, 2026
-94
But you will gladly be accomplice to the Islamic Republic’s torture, r***, and killing of Iranians. Congratulations on having chosen your side.
-94
jfrost378Mar 30, 2026
+35
Lmao as if the American administration gives any fucks about any of that.
35
scotchtreeMar 30, 2026
+64
Americans back to the “you’re either with us or you’re with the terrorists” thing again? How have they not learned a single thing in 20 years?
64
Grandso_everevereverMar 30, 2026
+48
Learning isn't really an American strong point.
Look who they voted in ... twice.
48
scotchtreeMar 30, 2026
+14
You’d think after the harm and suffering they caused in Iraq and Afghanistan they’d have some humility.
14
DougalishereMar 31, 2026
+1
they dont care, just using the same BS used to anyone against any war they wage, we heard the same in GW2 and in the last decade of the war on terror - IF youre not with us in everything we do you support terrorists - f*** off , weve heard this shit for 30 years at this point.
1
ZeroZeroZe77e7eMar 31, 2026
-9
First of all sir I’m not American. This is Listnook, just cause I speak English doesn’t place me in the US.
And this isn’t a zero sum fallacy, it’s not you’re with us or with the terrorists. You guys on here have been burned by past wars, youre still seeing G. Bush n your dreams, and you’ve spent too long commenting and reading comments on Listnook, and now you can’t believe someone has a different opinion than the braindead mainstream.
It’s absolutely it’s true: by preventing the US from using airspace, Spain are actively getting in the way of US ops, trying to make it harder to attack the Islamic republic. This is not “neutrality”, it’s a huge assist and show of support to the Islamic republic. It’s a stance on the issue. All involved parties know that the IR’s main weapon is propaganda + low cost military dirty tricks aimed at influencing public opinion, and a country like Spain doing this is in fact a strong message to them that their methods are supported.
Moreover If you know anything about Spain, you know about Sanchez’s party and how they’ve liked the IR in the past, how they have deals with them, how the IR has thanked them profusely for support, how they don’t like seeing them go. This isn’t about “Spain being neutral over history”, what kind of short sighted insight is that, please! It’s like you read the book cover and called it a day, you’re cooked!
Actually my congratulations to the Spanish poster were sincere. Clearly picking a side is much more respectable than pretending to be “neutral”. The perception of neutrality that all of you are pushing for is just weak personality, it’s cowardice hidden behind a false, smug, self righteousness. At least clearly choosing a side can be respected, it’s honest. But your claim of neutrality, while having your hands dirty in this, is pitiful and disgraceful. It’s ok to dislike war, but to have a hand in it and then pretend like you don’t is the lowest possible action in front of it.
-9
evilspyboyMar 31, 2026
+4
You:
>it’s not you’re with us or with the terrorists
Also you but earlier:
>Congratulations on having chosen your side.
4
ZeroZeroZe77e7eMar 31, 2026
-7
Read the full message more carefully then stop and think for a bit.
-7
evilspyboyMar 31, 2026
+4
Not bad but better advice for you to listen to would be 'stop and read what you wrote as it sounds to others and not to just to you'.
That would be way better advice.
4
HortaNordMar 30, 2026
+12
yes, I signed up for it and don't forget hanging people in public (irony) ,now the serious talk, freedom must be a choice, not an imposition, Iran's people have their own future in their hands and USSA won't spend a single bullet trying to free them, they just want the oil and deviation on attention from Pedophile Of The United State (POTUS)
12
binary_spaniardMar 31, 2026
+2
The US goverment is also torturing and killing Iranians and headed by a child rapist. You cannot pretend that we have to side with the Pedo Empire for human rights.
2
ZeroZeroZe77e7eMar 31, 2026
-1
That's an absurd claim, far detached from the actual reality. It's a lazy and incongruent comparison.
While the IR explicitly \*sanctions\* r***, killing of their own citizens beyond all deniability, the US does not sanction it whatsoever and punishes it by law - despite it still getting through the cracks. But those are cracks. If someone rapes/kills citizens and is not punished, in the US, they are slipping through the cracks of the law, or of the political climate. But the US do not use r*** deliberately, they do not weaponize it in mass. The do not deliberately machine-gun rows of their own citizens in the streets, they do not have torture chambers for their protesting citizens. If someone is caught doing something like that, in the US, they are tried, and if enough evidence is shown they are punished according to law. If Trump is proven to be a child rapist, as you say, then he is to be punished by law in the US. If he has done it but it can't be proven beyond doubt, he will slip through the cracks, and get away.
On the other hand in Iran, the IR uses r*** and killing systematically, it uses it deliberately as a weapon, and in mass. In Iran, there is no possibility of punishing those that are raping and killing the populace.
If Trump has actually raped children, I sincerely hope he is punished under the full extent of the law. It's a reality in the US. But he is not raping kids in Iran with this war, is he? In fact, the US is killing in Iran - they is killing the very killers and rapists who have sanctioned and performed the killing and r*** of Iran's own unarmed citizens. How can you have a problem with that? Do you support r*** and death in Iran?
-1
MerkenfighterMar 31, 2026
+2
Oh, bless your little cotton socks. So naive.
2
SleepingguitarmanMar 30, 2026
+6
Except this war wasn't even started over that and the right could give less of a shit if it occurs. That's just an excuse used to try to garner support for the war and save face by the current US administration.
One can be against the torture/murder/r*** of Irans citizens while also condemning a war that was started for nothing that has to do with that.
You really think the Trump administrations demands for the war to stop is that Iran would stop that shit from happening? If so, you clearly don't have a good understanding on this subject.
6
idhorstMar 30, 2026
+4
Zero sum fallacy.
4
nthpwrMar 30, 2026
+1
Choosing neutrality in this conflict isn't compliance with the Iranian regime. Direct your anger towards Israel who aren't even sending ground troops into a conflict they started.
1
CyanConatusMar 30, 2026
Oh classic. The with us or against us stance. If the US actually taught history you'd know why that's an extremist stance tied to immense violence.
0
gham89Mar 30, 2026
Your president was in the news today stating he's planning to blow up desalination plants, the source of water for the people of Iran....
0
OneMagicMangoMar 31, 2026
-4
Dude do you not know Spain? You know how many times they’ve been neutral in shit? This isn’t a surprise to anyone who knows history. And how tf does them not allowing the us to use its airspace mean they support Iran? Jesus Christ this is the such a stupid and unnecessary war
-4
Ban4SpeakingMar 30, 2026
+22
Spain leading by example
22
GreenWorldCaucusMar 30, 2026
+4
Good for Spain
4
AstronomerThat4357Mar 31, 2026
+1
👏👏👏👏👏
1
ProteinPonyMar 30, 2026
-21
As if they could enforce that stance if the US were to infringe Spains airspace. They are after all the only NATO nation not complying with the military budget target.
-21
TabbyredcatMar 30, 2026
+6
The agreed military budget for NATO was 2% of GDP. We pay 2% of GDP as agreed.
6
ProteinPonyMar 30, 2026
-14
Lying by omission or misinformed.
-14
OrienasJuraMar 30, 2026
+14
[Are you talking about yourself?](https://www.lamoncloa.gob.es/lang/en/presidente/news/paginas/2025/20250622-spain-nato-agreement.aspx)
14
TabbyredcatMar 30, 2026
+9
They've either read propaganda misinformation or believe that the agreed % is 5, which exactly 0 NATO countries pay.
I'm betting on the former.
NATO adopted a new goal of spending 5 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) on defense by 2035, with 3.5 percent going toward core military needs and 1.5 percent designated for related areas such as cyber and infrastructure.
Looks like you're living in 2035.
Lmaoooo
5
ProteinPonyMar 30, 2026
-5
Second article ignored. Again lying by omission.
-5
FuggyGlassesMar 30, 2026
+6
That is the first sentence of the second article...
6
TabbyredcatMar 30, 2026
+11
Look it up yourself. 2.1% of GDP as of 2025.
This is acknowledged by NATO, regardless of what the propaganda you read says.
11
SegullMar 30, 2026
-11
I don’t blame Spain, but it’s f****** stupid of them. We should try to build a base in Morocco instead.
F*** it, lets sell them the guns to retake Ceuta and Melilla
-11
TabbyredcatMar 31, 2026
+9
"Retake"? Ceuta and Melilla have been Spanish since before Morocco even started to exist.
9
Lez0fireMar 31, 2026
+1
You have been selling them weapons for decades. Israel sells them intelligence and helps them spy on Spain. Then you're confused when spaniards don't wanna fight in any war on Israel's or US's side lol.
1
ambadawnMar 31, 2026
-2
Left wing leader in Spain desperately trying to remain in power.
-2
Typingdude3Mar 30, 2026
-90
Why? Protecting the terrorist Iranian regime seems to be their #1 priority.
-90
Horat1us_UAMar 30, 2026
+52
Because they don’t want to participate in the war?
52
Typingdude3Mar 30, 2026
-67
No one is forcing them to?
-67
NormalSocietyMar 30, 2026
+41
Then why should they allow the US to use their airspace for war...if they don't want to participate in war?
41
ZombiFeynmanMar 30, 2026
+27
How would you feel if Iranian planes crossed Spanish airspace to bomb the US. Would you think Spain was participating in the war or everything was fine?
27
MolnutzMar 30, 2026
+4
Well...the IRGC isn't a Spanish ally for starters...
4
ZombiFeynmanMar 30, 2026
+11
And Spain isn't helping the IRGC. The alliance is defensive, and the US has not been attacked.
It's increasingly unclear how much of an ally the US is when it has threatened at least two allies, Canada and Denmark, and raised tariffs against the rest.
11
MolnutzMar 30, 2026
Can we agree that the IRGC needs to get spanked? Because they need to get spanked. And they are getting spanked. It's been 47 years in the making.
0
ZombiFeynmanMar 30, 2026
+6
It's a terribly evil organization, but I'm afraid the current attacks may have reinforced their position. There were a lot of protests against them just before the war started, and not much these days. Nothing like an external attack to rally people around the government.
This is another reason why I hate this war so much, it seems like there was 0 though put into it.
6
NormalSocietyMar 30, 2026
+1
You have done the exact opposite of spanking them. You gave their government the Golden Ticket.
Not only are you making sure that the Iranian public hates you, but you have also done the one thing you went to war for: you gave them nukes. Yes. You did.
If you do not actually nation-build--not like Iraq or Afghanastan, but actually Marshall Plan style--they will build nukes.
All America has done is help the government.
1
MolnutzMar 30, 2026
-1
Are you talking to me? Because I'm not American. I also wholeheartedly disagree with your assessment. Thanks for playing.
-1
Horat1us_UAMar 30, 2026
I can Agree that Trump needs to get spanked. But I doubt you will agree we need to bomb Washington
0
Horat1us_UAMar 30, 2026
+6
The US did it using their airspace during the war
6
Alternative_Band_494Mar 30, 2026
+7
Letting warplanes use your airfields and airspace for bombing runs is participating. If only our UK Government could also realise this. Saudi is definitely finding this out.
I, for one, am glad they are not participating. Hopefully they get passes to allow their tankers to traverse the Strait asap. Countries need to be rewarded for this correct action against an illegal war.
7
Klutzy_Anybody_1487Mar 30, 2026
-26
classic spain, if it doesn't affect me it doesn't exist. I bet they would let russians get all the way to pyrenean mountains because it's not their problem of course. Until it is.
-26
TabbyredcatMar 30, 2026
+14
We agreed to give Ukraine 1B€ just a couple of weeks ago. We've been supporting them since the beginning of the war.
14
Horat1us_UAMar 30, 2026
+7
Spain provides millitary and other aid to Ukraine. The US does not.
7
Yep_that_is_meMar 30, 2026
+30
Sir, Trump administration is a bigger terrorist regime these days.
30
Brilliant_Version344Mar 30, 2026
+10
Nobody likes the Iran regime but this war is illegal and all it’s doing cementing the regime grip in Iran even Biden wasn’t dumb enough to bomb Iran
10
Arbyssandwich1014Mar 30, 2026
+8
Just put the fries in the bag, sir.
8
DoireKMar 30, 2026
+3
Israel is also a terrorist regime but I don’t see the US taking issue with them.
US kicked this shit off, they can sort it out.
3
YoramusMar 30, 2026
-16
Probably this is a request by Iran in return for some favor. But I hope for Spain that the favor is huge... this is a big gain for Iran sybolically
-16
fevseaMar 30, 2026
+12
Sure, because spain has a lot of vested interest in Iran. We don't even import fuel from the zone, as are much closer to Alger. We do see the price increase of this shitshow tough.
12
YoramusMar 30, 2026
-10
Yes? Iran gives Spanish ships passage through Hormuz and it is an economy of 80M people, many of them very well educated. Of course it can offer Spain a lot and if the regime was democratic that would have been a great thing
Or Spanish politicians decided such a move only on "moral" principles? That's laughable
-10
TabbyredcatMar 30, 2026
+6
Exactly zero Spanish ships go through the strait of Hormuz.
Spanish politicians decided such move for the same reason any country's politicians take any decision. Participating in this war is against our interests, that simple.
6
fevseaMar 30, 2026
+9
Just so you know last year we exported an order of magnitude more to Israel than to Iran. It would make no financial sense to support the small one.
The stand is very clearly agains war, as the last time we responded to a USA NATO call on that region, we had terrorist attack on our mainland. As we dont have any nearby conflict this is the most recent event, so no politician wants to be nowhere near this madness.
66 Comments