WHO says the wider public risk is low, but the messy part is tracing everyone who got off the ship before they knew what it was
59
Middle_Evening87485 days ago
+9
Has it been made public how the couple who passed away contracted it in the first place?
9
machinegirl115 days ago
+23
Bird watching tour in Patagonia
23
Middle_Evening87485 days ago
+18
Interesting. Being broke has saved meeee (for now). Thank you!
18
skm_455 days ago
+11
At a landfill
11
Visible-Ad3765 days ago
+3
Mice poo
3
joelfarris4 days ago
+1
So do rats. But some of them can make Étouffée.
1
ChemicalNo28785 days ago
+15
Counterpoint, but due to how this virus has a very short transmission window (1 day before symptoms) and high on the day symptoms onset, quarantining those should be a priority before they potentially reach that critical window. Now lets say if a person who got off starts showing an onset of symptoms, transmission is very high, but after a couple days the risk falls dramatically, which is why the KLM Flight attendant as of Friday 8, tested negative. Which is why WHO says the risk is low. They are using the case of the 2018 Andes Virus outbreak to rule-out a pandemic.
15
withoutatt5 days ago
+7
I wonder why only the one klm flight attendant is a cause for concern; considering the Dutch woman was peak symptoms at that point. Surely there are others who came into contact with her.
7
poco5 days ago
+8
The flight attendant has tested negative but one of the other passengers has a cough.
8
scyice5 days ago
+4
I also have a cough.
4
withoutatt5 days ago
+1
Yeah but we are only hearing about this one flight attendant and French dude. Dutch lady was peak contagious at this point. I don’t get it
1
External-Praline-4515 days ago
+1
She was unwell I believe, so was hospitalised out of caution. But it seems like it was an unrelated virus, possibly just a cold.
1
cakenmistakes5 days ago
+7
The people at the airport these cruise people interacted with as well as the ones on the planes they were on. It’s not like people teleport from the cruise ship to their plane seats. And what if they had connecting flights?
With 1-7 weeks before symptoms appear and if that flight attendant tests positive for Hantavirus, it’s more contagious than what WHO is saying. Because how can it spread in such a short period of time from the widow to the FA?
7
Flimsy-Sprinkles73315 days ago
+15
Hey, good news for you: the flight attendant tested negative.
https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/klm-flight-attendant-tested-negative-hantavirus-infection-who-says-2026-05-08/
15
cakenmistakes5 days ago
+5
Okay, that’s very good news indeed.
5
Flimsy-Sprinkles73315 days ago
+6
Go enjoy your weekend, while you can.
6
the_crumb_dumpster5 days ago
+9
I remember in February 2020 when “the risk is low”
9
vtccasp3r5 days ago
+2
They will always say that. Everything else doesnt make sense before they know more.
2
echodarlin4 days ago
+2
Exactly. I was thinking back to the very start of me hearing reports about COVID for the first time. It didn't seem to be anything to worry about until one day it just was. My experience was from working at a plasma donation center so I was able to watch how it went from being nothing to worry about to us having to make a lot of changes to the procedures including one interesting change was the pay was $100 a donation from donors who had gotten sick previously with COVID and could show proof. Those donors were making bank for awhile. They cut my hours because it slowed down and I was kind of jealous I wasn't able to get the $100 COVID pay... and of course the decision to shut down schools was a huge deal that I never expected either.
2
Tokey_Tokey3 days ago
+1
COVID 19 was detected December 2019, Start of Jan 2020 they said it wasn't serious and by the end of jan 2020 it was being treated much more seriously.
And people were still upset at WHO...
1
tripping_yarns5 days ago
+56
Be interesting to see how the conspiracy crowd who won’t wear masks fare if there was a viral outbreak with a 40% mortality rate.
56
Dry-Replacement38665 days ago
+61
There’s already quite a few people online talking about how the boat doesn’t even exist and it’s a psy-op.
61
Protean_Protein5 days ago
+39
It’s one guy and a bunch of Russian bots.
39
ac91165 days ago
+47
That one guy? The President of the United States
47
BussHateYear5 days ago
+5
No he’s one of the bots.
5
ResponsibleKenil5 days ago
+1
Because people who think it’s a nothingburger don’t understand where all the hype is coming from. How is a virus with the death rate of Ebola supposed to become a global pandemic.
1
psychmonkies5 days ago
+5
I already saw someone talking about how the virus was in the Covid vaccine
5
External-Praline-4515 days ago
+9
JFC, it seems there's no rock bottom for stupidity.
9
Superbunzil5 days ago
-2
I mean... technically
Edit: y'all cant be this stupid and miss an mRNA joke
-2
Enemy_Of_Everyone4 days ago
+2
Your first mistake was assuming the average Listnook user knows how a vaccine works even in the grade school sense.
2
2barefeet5 days ago
It’s 40% only once certain symptoms show. Not everyone who gets it progresses to the stage when the mortality rate is that high.
0
tripping_yarns4 days ago
+1
I didn’t mean this virus, which I don’t think will become a pandemic. But there will be others, and social media conditioning will kill millions.
1
2barefeet4 days ago
Agree. Think about how ignorant the average person is. Half are dumber than that.
0
lpan0005 days ago
-13
The price we will pay to be right
-13
tripping_yarns5 days ago
+5
What? Death? Which would prove you wrong anyway?
5
ResponsibleKenil5 days ago
-3
You mean the crowd that doesn’t want to turn off the economy because we still haven’t recovered from the last time it was turned off
-3
SoberingGiraffe5 days ago
+23
Why can't it stay at sea for a bit?
23
Dblcut35 days ago
+3
….So more people don’t die?
3
Massive-Teaching52865 days ago
+11
If everyone on the ship dies then it keeps the rest of us safe
11
bdjohn065 days ago
-1
People deserve access to healthcare. Additionally forcing everyone on the ship to die doesn’t eradicate the virus. It’ll continue to exist in South America infecting hundreds of people every year.
-1
SignorJC5 days ago
+3
You can deliver supplies to the ship dawg
3
Dblcut34 days ago
+4
You can’t prevent healthy people from contracting the virus when you keep them locked up on a boat with sick people
4
PositiveScarcity89094 days ago
+1
It's a sacrifice I am willing to make.
1
PositiveScarcity89094 days ago
+1
Just use the Ukranian drone in Greece to sink the boat so they don't suffer.
1
Middle_Evening87485 days ago
+20
The timeline and visuals in this article are actually really helpful for understanding how everything has unfolded. Depending on how this spreads the next 48 hours to 8 weeks should be interesting.
20
Flimsy-Sprinkles73315 days ago
+7
One person's "interesting" is another person's "terrifying." Context: I live in Europe.
7
Untappedsweetie5 days ago
+11
My best friend is in Tenerife, born and raised. “Interesting” and “terrifying” are both good words for it.
He’s coping by making “death by poo-poo” jokes and I’m coping by not coping. I live in Ontario. I don’t care how “remote” the port is, it’s a day trip from any one point of that island to the other for me.
It’s not that I don’t trust the scientists and doctors. It’s that I don’t trust people to listen to the scientists and doctors. Like, they will go, “hey, just don’t like start licking random doorknobs and we will be fine” and someone will be like, “well now it’s my lot in life to lick doorknobs because I’ve been told not to do that.”
11
[deleted]5 days ago
+3
[deleted]
3
No_Conversation_93255 days ago
+5
They will be safely evacuated without exposure to islanders and passed onto their own countries. The Spanish citizens will be then quarantined in Madrid.
5
Complete-Sort16175 days ago
+3
Lazaretto ships Jesus Christ
3
smilbandit5 days ago
+1
is this the same hantavirus ship or another one?
1
Flimsy-Sprinkles73315 days ago
-1
I've got a bad feeling about this...
-1
[deleted]5 days ago
-6
[removed]
-6
IFL_DINOSAURS5 days ago
+6
before you click - the site has a crazy mobile ad redirect.
6
tripping_yarns5 days ago
+4
Impossible to look at the site, constant hacky redirects.
4
cartgirl695 days ago
-3
Works perfect on my phone and super helpful. What browser are you using?
-3
[deleted]5 days ago
-1
[removed]
-1
AppointmentSorry14875 days ago
+3
Straight to an online c***** page.
3
cartgirl695 days ago
-5
Wow this is super helpful. Thank you!
-5
Ok-Wolverine-32385 days ago
-3
Where is Spain going to evacuate?
-3
Novemberai5 days ago
+7
Portugal
7
Kxevineth5 days ago
+3
I would assume they can evacuate people to the mainland..?
3
[deleted]5 days ago
-21
[removed]
-21
Nathan-Stubblefield5 days ago
+20
Millions died, you say “nothing happened.”
20
rumforbreakfast5 days ago
+10
Maybe ‘nothing’ happened because the 2020 steps worked?
10
pies4days5 days ago
-13
Nothing happened because COVID had a .01 percent chance of killing a healthy person.
-13
Magusreaver5 days ago
+13
I lost close friends and family. Something happened to us.
13
acityonthemoon5 days ago
+16
hidden account spreading old worn out bullshit.... shocking.
16
Mitchverr5 days ago
+11
Ah yes, lets just ignore that 90% of the population have some forms of health issues, many of which had potential risks with COVID. EG 20% of people in the UK have some kind of lung related disease/illness, which would put them squarely in the problem group for something that targets lungs... like COVID does.
And your number is a hindsight number, governments saw a respiratory illness which was highly contagious and went "oh c*** push the middle button" on the reaction table. If you want to know the "big red button" for a proper quarantine for high risk, they deploy the military on the street to start shooting people to stop them from spreading it further.
11
NAh945 days ago
+3
First and most important point, when COVID initially came on the scene it was a novel coronavirus and the only comparison we had was to SARS-Cov which had a 9-13% case fatality rate. We had no idea what COVID was capable of, so high precautions were very much needed early on as you couldn’t take that chance. The earliest alpha strain was indeed more severe at all, if you average in what Covid is today you get 0.1%, but the %CFR was higher in the initial waves around 1-3%, depending on the reports - as is the ebb and flow of these things. They become less lethal and spread more easily as natural selection pressures favor spread over severity virulence. People like you who brush off potentially very fatal diseases will be the death of millions one day, and you’re just as likely to be among them with a disease like Hanta. Young hikers can contract the disease, and days-weeks later convert to HCPS and die within hours of cardiopulmonary failure with the sin nombre strain.
Secondly, the good thing is even though hantavirus has a very high %CFR (30-50% depending on the strain on conversion to cardiopulmonary syndrome) it either doesn’t spread human-to-human or it’s very difficult to do so. Granted, that could have changed but it is reasonable to assume that is still the case since this is a known strain humans have encountered before and is not a novel virus. Until you have sequencing, epidemiological, and symptomology evidence that allows for proof this is spreading human-to-human without sustained, close contact there is less of a need to worry about it, But it is important to keep tabs on. Awkwardly enough, hantavirus is so severe that it isn’t favorable to rapid & aggressive spread because it kills the host so often. So there’s the silver lining?
3
Mitchverr5 days ago
+5
Not exactly an overreaction, the massive levels of hospitalisations meant without social distancing and preventative measures there was a very real reality of regional medical system collapse in Western nations yet alone elder care.
The NHS in the UK for example was very much brought to breaking point even with people following the rules in spite of the government not doing so. IIRC similar stories from France, Spain, etc.
It wasnt just about lethality for healthy people (which was a major concern originally) but the sheer time and space required for all these patients.
Also, general hindsight viewing of a potential pandemic issue is highly silly, thats how you have complacency and when a really bad disease goes wildfire, nothing happens to stop it because "we dont want to overreact".
5
brelyxp5 days ago
+4
This time most of the population will just give the middle finger and continue her daily life, they will need the army to enforce something
74 Comments