· 199 comments · Save ·
Announcements Mar 23, 2026 at 5:00 PM

‘Star Trek: Starfleet Academy’ to End With Season 2

Posted by Turbostrider27


https://variety.com/2026/tv/news/star-trek-starfleet-academy-canceled-season-2-1236696816/

🚩 Report this post

199 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
sgthombre Mar 23, 2026 +588
So far, the only Trek show of the Kurtzman era to not be ended earlier than planned was Picard, which was always pitched as a three season series. Discovery was cancelled after season 5 while season 6 was being written, they had to reshoot their season finale into a series finale. SNW is ending with a shortened season to wrap it up, Lower Decks was cancelled before the completed fifth season could air, Prodigy Paramount tried to delist and write off completely.
588
Jack_Bartowski Mar 23, 2026 +201
SNW is ending already?!?
201
Internal_Wheel_89 Mar 23, 2026 +254
seasons four and five have already been filmed. Right now, there is currently no Trek show in active development or production.
254
Fyrefawx Mar 23, 2026 +190
Paramount is going to kill everything.
190
fartingbeagle Mar 23, 2026 +63
They have become Death, the destroyer of franchises.
63
pyratemime Mar 23, 2026 +28
Paramount is just the gravedigger. Kurtzman did a fine job of killing the franchise just as all of Jar Jar Abrams acolytes kill every franchise they touch.
28
Hardback247 Mar 24, 2026 +3
That’s “Jeffrey Jacob Abrams,” silly.
3
thomyorkeslazyeye Mar 23, 2026 +54
Eh, these old IPs aren't going anywhere. Once AI starts writing them, we are going to be fed slop nonstop.
54
PhoolyCooly Mar 23, 2026 +56
I'm going to be real with you. If they feed the model with scripts from the successful shows I bet it would be far better than what we've endured lately. Don't see how it could be much worse.
56
wildwolfay5 Mar 23, 2026 +10
The Next Nexter Newerist Generation.
10
scorpyo72 Mar 23, 2026 +4
I respect your Newerisitaciousness.
4
TurelSun Mar 23, 2026 +39
I mean its people with that kind of mindset that will probably make AI Slop profitable. Just drip feed the nostalgia and comfortable expectations in slow enough to keep the dollars flowing.
39
ninjyte Mar 23, 2026 +4
I don't think you should even joke about this because Paramount execs will start using AI-generated scripts the second they can figure out a way to circumvent Union restrictions, and the scripts will be worse than anything you can ever imagine.
4
Oneinchwalrus Mar 23, 2026 +42
Absolutely fine for them to rest it for a few years, get a new showrunner and new ideas (doubt Kurtzman is going anywhere though) This has been a ropey 10 years or so for Star Trek
42
roastedmarshmellows Mar 23, 2026 +29
One thing I've noticed since "intergenerational" filmmaking became a thing is that the projects that are driven by corporate algorithms and desires to make money almost always fail because they fundamentally miss the "soul" of the IP they're butchering. However, when you have projects made by people who are actual FANS of the IP, the quality is so much higher just because of the love you can feel the showrunners have. I like to compare Star Trek (Disco, and the Abramsverse films vs Lower Decks) or Star Wars (the sequel trilogy vs the Mandalorian). Regardless of whether or not you personally enjoyed the style of Lower Decks or whatever, it's hard to deny that the people who made Lower Decks REALLY love Star Trek.
29
Internal_Wheel_89 Mar 23, 2026 +45
I love Lower Decks and it's clear it was made by fans of Trek. But Nicholas Meyer wasn't a "fan" and he ended up writing and/or directing all of the "good" TOS movies. Michael Piller and Jeri Taylor weren't "fans" but were instead incredibly talented and competent television writers and they essentially molded TNG into the cultural phenomenon that still resonates today.
45
TurelSun Mar 23, 2026 +39
Tony Gilroy wasn't a Star Wars fan and Andor is probably the best Star Wars show we'll ever get.
39
roastedmarshmellows Mar 23, 2026 +13
That was also 30-40 years ago. The media landscape has changed very drastically since then. You're absolutely right, of course. You don't \*need\* to be fans to make a good product, just that where we are now in terms of media production, the corporate side tends to miss what actually made the properties special.
13
No-Pineapple-7986 Mar 23, 2026 +3
What they're doing is turning a property like Star Trek into a standard human drama... the look is Star Trek, the plot is Beverly Hills 90210 with aliens.
3
spaceandthewoods_ Mar 23, 2026 +17
The Mandalorian and Fillioni's "love" of Star Wars are one of the worst things to happen to the franchise in the modern period. Look at Andor; it's one of the best pieces of Star Wars media ever made and Tony Gilroy has _zero_ interest in Star Wars itself. In the meantime Fillioni is off churning out shallow, bland TV shows where he mashes his favourite action figures together. And I say this as someone who has been a huge Star Wars nerd for 30 years
17
roastedmarshmellows Mar 23, 2026 +17
Andor is good, but it's not \*Star Wars\*... Filoni may not be everyone's cup of tea, but he understands what the soul of Star Wars is, and that's a campy-ass space fantasy western for children. I love Andor, I love seeing these vignettes into the universe, but The Mandalorian is FAR closer to the original Star Wars than Andor will ever be. And again, it doesn't need to be one or the other... we can have adult, political stories set in Star Wars, and we can have the cheesy space opera stuff for kids. There IS room at the table for both.
17
NachoNutritious Mar 23, 2026 +10
Gen-Xers get so unbelievably butthurt when you remind them that Star Wars is a franchise for children and meant to sell toys. lmao
10
ChiefBlueSky Mar 23, 2026 +10
Kurtzman is the worst thing to happen to star trek, i hope he finally gets the boot
10
Internal_Wheel_89 Mar 23, 2026 +4
I'm honestly not against a rest and reset -- I'd love a complete aesthetic overhaul, for example -- but I'm worried about what sort of dumbass will be put in charge by this Paramount regime. Although I expect the next several years to be very tumultuous for Paramount/WBD and all of that worry will probably be wasted energy.
4
Existing_Set2100 Mar 23, 2026 +12
Back to the drawing board? Or maybe another shot for the famously reliable Bryan Fuller. 
12
0x831 Mar 23, 2026 +18
They should just make new episodes of voyager set 30 years in the future in an alternate timeline where they’re all still trying to get home and are older.
18
Existing_Set2100 Mar 23, 2026 +11
If they ever rebooted Voyager they should actually follow its promising premise this time.   But now it might be seen as a retread of BSG, which Trek vet Ronald D. Moore explicitly wanted to be Voyager done right anyway. 
11
Dogbuysvan Mar 23, 2026 +9
The speed at which they dropped the maquis stuff was pretty funny.
9
squjibo Mar 23, 2026 +21
Upcoming 4th season will be the last full season, the 5th season will be shortened and the final season.
21
sgthombre Mar 23, 2026 +18
Season 4 hasn't aired yet but it was renewed for a final fifth season that's only going to be six episodes.
18
Internal_Wheel_89 Mar 23, 2026 +12
those six episodes have already been filmed. Production wrapped on SNW back in December.
12
georgecm12 Mar 23, 2026 +28
And I think even Picard would also have ended early (after season 2), had they not pivoted to the TNG reunion show. I don't think that's what was originally envisioned for season 3, but it let them hit that three season mark that they were aiming for.
28
VoraciousChallenge Mar 24, 2026 +5
SirPatStew was completely against the idea of TNG reunions. I think it was a condition of his signing on in the first place that he wouldn't be in uniform and it wouldn't be a reunion show. Season 3 was kind of an "in case of emergency, break Worf" situation. The worst part of that show was how much control SirPatStew had over it. There's a lot of risk involved in letting actors take the reigns. They often don't really get what worked about a show or character and they have their own desires that run contrary to what's good for the show. I'm surprised there were no dune buggies featured.
5
Tamination Mar 23, 2026 +14
Lower decks had lots more legs to it. I want more damn it!
14
DapperEmergency4420 Mar 23, 2026 +5
There are comics still being released!
5
Kevbot1000 Mar 23, 2026 +23
Atleast Lower Decks was able to see what was ahead, and made a super satisfying final season.
23
GringottsWizardBank Mar 23, 2026 +86
Picard was wild. Season 1 was bad, season 2 was terrible, and season 3 was great. Such an inconsistent series.
86
shy247er Mar 23, 2026 +96
I still can't believe that they actually (major plot spoilers) >!had the audacity to kill Picard only to bring him back as a synth. The biggest character in the ST universe and they kill him, only for us to watch the copy of him for the rest of the show!<
96
sgthombre Mar 23, 2026 +86
>!They really did this, they turned Captain Picard into an undead robot lich and then just... didn't bring it up again, and people had tearful reunions with the copy even though it was a completely different guy/robot that they'd never met. Picard's son had a whole reunion arc with a robot that just happened to look like his father, he never met him. Insanity!<
86
what_mustache Mar 23, 2026 +46
This is so true. The entire time I watched S3 I kept thinking "wait, isnt he just a robot"? Doesnt everyone know he's just a robot? Do they want me to forget he's a robot??? I've never seen anything like it before.
46
TTBurger88 Mar 24, 2026 +5
They could have had Q snap his fingers and bada bing bada boom Picard is a real boy again.
5
AsexualNinja Mar 23, 2026 +7
I can’t get spoilers to work, so I can only say the Doctor Who novels did the same to two characters between televised episodes, and it’s portrayed as no big deal.
7
MartianLM Mar 23, 2026 +10
Yeah, that really bothered me too, it was weird.
10
Richard_Sauce Mar 23, 2026 +3
It was definitely a retcon by way of omission. If we just don't bring it up, maybe everyone will just forget?
3
VoraciousChallenge Mar 24, 2026 +4
You know how else they could have retconned that? When Q shows up in Season 2, he looks at Picard and says "what happened to you, oh this simply won't do" and snaps his fingers. Picard is now a Real Boy again. Still a cop-out, but at least it restores some authenticity to the later seasons. Hell, throw in some oblique references to Tapestry while you're at it. 'Member Tapestry?
4
onarainyafternoon Mar 23, 2026 +16
This is just....wrong, though? They transferred Picard's consciousness into the Golem body. So it was the same person, just in a synth body.
16
AuryGlenz Mar 23, 2026 +59
Real sci-fi would have made it a point to explore the question of whether it was really him or not.
59
therikermanouver Mar 23, 2026 +14
Ironically Star Trek has touched up on this in the past in Deep Space Nine "it may look Iikr Berial,. It may sound like Berial but it is not Berial." Or words to that effect
14
numb3rb0y Mar 23, 2026 +11
Except that was a completely different situation involving piecemeal replacement of the brain in-situ. There's actually a really simple test to see whether this is just bias against the show - do you think there are two Spocks? Because **exactly** the same process of katra transfer happened there, but no-one tries to argue the Spock we see after *Search* isn't real.
11
m0dru Mar 23, 2026 +9
Star Trek already had transporters. Why is this just now a point of contention for people?
9
faultysynapse Mar 23, 2026 +18
Right? Absolutely brain dead maneuver. Also, what was with them trying to make it out like Data and Picard were the bestest of buddies? Sure, they had a good relationship, but Geordie and Data were the real power couple. Total best friends forever. I don't seem to remember if Geordie ever got to say goodbye to his friend and that makes me sad.
18
Alaska_Jack Mar 23, 2026 +4
Every single character in Star Trek is a simulacrum anyway.  Every one who has used a transporter, anyway. 
4
shy247er Mar 23, 2026 +2
> Every one who has used a transporter, anyway. Well yeah, that's whole other can of worms.
2
tedsmitts Mar 23, 2026 +9
It seemed like half of it took place in a parking lot.
9
sgthombre Mar 23, 2026 +22
> season 2 was terrible Production on that season got completely fucked by COVID and Paramount forced a bunch of rewrites onto it at the very last minute because it was "too Star Treky", so some of that was out of the makers/writers hands, but f*** me it was baaad
22
talex365 Mar 23, 2026 +12
A Star Trek show was too Star Treky? WTF is wrong with people?
12
Internal_Wheel_89 Mar 23, 2026 +18
You can blame Patrick Stewart for a lot of that. It was his mandate that the show be "different"; otherwise he didn't want to do it.
18
sweet_esiban Mar 23, 2026 +8
Much as I love Sir Patrick, I do blame him for this lol I'm glad he, as an individual, got to make a project about his childhood trauma. I just wish he hadn't wrecked Jean Luc f****** Picard's backstory to do it. Pls just let Jonathan Frakes do stuff, Paramount. He actually gets Trek :(
8
-Memnarch- Mar 23, 2026 +21
Lower Decks being removed from Amazon and pushed to Paramount Plus exclusively killed it for me. I'd argue I wasn't the only one who didn't follow.
21
thegloriousporpoise Mar 23, 2026 +30
I would imagine and look I’m just speculating. But when you intentionally go against most of the expected season and episode story telling structure fans expect, you will lose their interest. I remember the days when the Enterprise explored strange new worlds. Now we spend most time dealing with relationship issues.
30
TheAmorphous Mar 23, 2026 +19
Are there any episodes of Discovery where no one cries?
19
thegloriousporpoise Mar 23, 2026 +25
I know I cried every episode. But probably not for the same reasons as the characters.
25
TurkeyPhat Mar 23, 2026 +5
And if you weren't crying you were probably popping another Tylenol to soothe a camerawork induced headache.
5
Techno_Core Mar 23, 2026 +3
Lower Decks def had a series finale so they must have know it was the end before they wrote the 5th season. Am I getting something wrong?
3
MorbotheDiddlyDo Mar 23, 2026 +3
The enshittification of TV is truly remarkable. From 25 episode seasons (TNG) now modern shows have slipped to 16, 14...12...then 8 episode seasons. Fewer seasons also. Shorter run times per ep. People complained so much about filler episodes for modern TV now no show keeps attention long enough to earn a renewal. Writing aside this is symptomatic of the architecture of the modern TV structure.
3
frankduxvandamme Mar 23, 2026 +14
Not surprising. It's been mostly garbage. Trek should be weekly, episodic, 24 episodes a season, exploring strange new worlds. Not 90210 in space.
14
code603 Mar 23, 2026 +2
Prodigy was absolutely fantastic. Bummed it got canceled so early.
2
ten_year_rebound Mar 23, 2026 +172
I think this will be the end for this era of Trek
172
Moonrocks321 Mar 23, 2026 +97
If that’s the only way to pry it from Kurtzman, good.
97
SoontobeSam Mar 23, 2026 +49
I’d really like to see trek return to the more established eras instead of the 32nd century. Either post SNW/TOS or in the post DS9/Voyager period before or even exploring the synth attack on mars.
49
jasdonle Mar 23, 2026 +11
Post Voyager please, actually post-Picard S3. Legacy show please. 
11
Android1822 Mar 23, 2026 +21
I want any future trek to pretend kurtzman trek never existed and was some weird alternate timeline.
21
Sanctif13d Mar 23, 2026 +3
Man, what a wild holodeck episode of (insert decent trek series here) that was, glad none of it was real in the end. There, it never existed.
3
jasdonle Mar 23, 2026 +2
That’s the beauty of a post-Picard season 3 show. It’d take place ~700 years before half of Disco and all of SFA
2
Flipnotics_ Mar 23, 2026 +16
Post Voyager is what we need. 24 episodes a season. The episodes don't need to be huge productions either. Focus on the story and message, not the flashy flash-flash nonsense. Adhere to the old ways.
16
Tube_Warmer Mar 23, 2026 +5
For all the writing issues of nutrek, that has been the most glaring issue. The need to be "cinematic" in every frame. Theres no space to force the writing to up its game. Like the Drumhead in TNG. The episode had no budget, so they had to actually write something with the writing doing all the heavy lifting. It really needs to get back to basics, and focus on characters and challenging those characters with universal themes and questions of ethics and morality. That where star trek excelled, not in the pew pew shit.
5
Intelligent_Offer672 Mar 23, 2026 +3
Visiting different worlds, with different species, that had different adaptations was an exciting part for me. Star Trek Enterprise was a series I loved too. And that was what made Stargate SG-1 so good. Then late in the season, it led to the war with The Borg, Replicators, or the Ori.
3
Cub3h Mar 24, 2026 +3
And for the love of god, write them like they're characters in a (mostly) utopian future. Why were characters in modern Trek talking like they're from 2026? It completely takes away the immersion.
3
MillennialsAre40 Mar 23, 2026 +5
Just open the new series with the Romulans Supernova being averted, thus shunting the Abram/Kurtzmans era into a new timeline
5
Darrenizer Mar 23, 2026 +26
Great news.
26
ShedMontgomery Mar 23, 2026 +7
I know they're not really going out on their own terms, but I'm okay with the franchise taking a little break. Let people miss it a bit, see what new talent you can attract and what fresh ideas they might have for it.
7
Street_Anxiety2907 Mar 23, 2026 +7
Bring back the idea-driven themes. TNG and TOS were built around a concept or dilemma, not sex and personality conflicts. Like moral paradoxes, scientific anomaly, philosophical questions. Character arcs exist, but they are subordinate to the premise of the week. The fact the franchise reboots keep failing is because a space themed Seinfeld episode is not appealing. Otherwise it might as well be grays anatomy, friends, melrose place, big bang theory, game of thrones. I still watch classic trek because it wasn't those things. Paramount just doesn't get it, and I think the audience wants what I want, it's why nobody watches this trash.
7
dalek_999 Mar 23, 2026 +19
Thank f***.
19
bluehawk232 Mar 23, 2026 +416
Maybe we can fire kurtzman next
416
WizardPhoenix Mar 23, 2026 +120
Ellison is an idiot, he’ll keep Kurtzman
120
sgthombre Mar 23, 2026 +40
There's been talk in the box office sub that he's not really interested in Trek as a TV franchise but wants it back in theaters, but given how many times Paramount has cancelled and redeveloped the next Trek movie who knows when that might actually happen.
40
WizardPhoenix Mar 23, 2026 +14
If Ellison wants to make 30 movies a year and have many of them be high budgeted movies having your stock be downgraded to junk status means that is basically impossible. A producer or investor will never get their money back.
14
sgthombre Mar 23, 2026 +20
> 30 movies a year Genuinely can't think of a more obvious lie in the history of this industry, if anyone in TV or film production actually believes Ellison on that I've got several fine bridges at competitive prices they should take a look at.
20
Heyitskit Mar 23, 2026 +2
You know it's a lie straight off with all the firings, if the plan was to increase production letting go of the majority of your staff is a braindead move.
2
blublub1243 Mar 23, 2026 +9
I can't see a single reason why he would though. I'm fairly confident Kurtzman hasn't exactly been bringing in the big bucks, and it's not like he's in alignment with Ellison politically. Why exactly would he keep him around?
9
NachoNutritious Mar 23, 2026 +16
Shitting on Ellison in any context is like an infinite upvote glitch. Even if it doesn't actually make sense. There's literally zero chance the current regime at Paramount wants Kurtzman around.
16
TheFalconKid Mar 23, 2026 +5
He's going to install a new showrunner and the next Stat Trek series will follow a crew that breaks the core tenants of the series and have them go to uncontacted planets and teach them the values of Christianity and lower taxes and regulations on corporations.
5
vexx Mar 23, 2026 +118
How in the hell is Kurtzman clinging onto his job atp?
118
Morgan-Moonscar Mar 23, 2026 +45
He knows where the bodies are buried.
45
Tube_Warmer Mar 23, 2026 +8
Supposedly, he gets things done on time and on budget. Which, Im told, higher ups really like.
8
Android1822 Mar 23, 2026 +4
Sheer f****** nepotism.
4
Ned_Shimmelfinney Mar 23, 2026 +51
The thing I don't understand about this era of Star Trek is the unwillingness to course correct. No lessons have been learned throughout this whole failed experiment. It's just the same nonsense show after show. "You people don't like our vision for Star Trek? Well, too bad, because we're just gonna keep on givin' it to ya."
51
Richard_Sauce Mar 23, 2026 +11
These shows have a core fanbase that dominates social media and fan spaces like r/startrek. If you look there for feeback, which I'm sure most of the showrunners and execs did, then everything is great. Trek is the best it's ever been, and the only people who disagree are 70 year MAGA chuds who actually hate Trek and/or can't let go of the past. That is a very loyal, very passionate fanbase. They also aren't enough to keep a franchise alive. More or less everyone who isn't in the "All Trek is great Trek," camp have soured to some degree on Nu-Trek. Regardless of quality, Academy, and Nu-Trek in general, has failed because there just wasn't an audience. though even as I type this there hundreds of fans on r/startrek still blaming the "negative fans" and the Right for Academy getting canceld. Right Wing Chuds exist, they suck, they review bomb and use these shows to ragebait their chud followers on social media and youtube, but they really don't move the needle that much. The real problem wasn't the people that hated it, it was the people that looked at the trailers, or watched the first few episodes, and decided not to watch anymore, or who already didn't want to watch any more Trek from this era after being burned by Picard and Discovery.
11
Revenge_served_hot Mar 23, 2026 +15
I get what you are saying but our fanbase (the Star Trek fanbase) is much larger than the group of users at r/startrek... So many have been banned over there for voicing their oppinion over the slop we have been served these last years and so many others left the sub because we saw it was just hijacked by a loud minority that did not accept any kind of criticism of NuTrek. There are still so many fans that grew up with TNG/DS9/VOY and are now in our 40s and 50s and we crave new Star Trek, just not the abysmal trash we have been served these last years with Discovery and Starfleet Academy.
15
Android1822 Mar 23, 2026 +2
That isn't a trek thing, that is a hollywood thing.
2
AgeHorror5288 Mar 23, 2026 +196
I enjoyed lower decks. I thought it was the best of all the shows so far, but that’s my hot take.
196
RunningNumbers Mar 23, 2026 +64
They had fun. A lot of the new trek has thrown away the exploration and mystery elements for schlocky action. And not the good kind with fist fighting Gorns.
64
roastedmarshmellows Mar 23, 2026 +26
Ahh! Gorn wedding!!
26
lurking_scawthorn Mar 23, 2026 +16
*reboots* Ahh! I’m still at the Gorn wedding!
16
roastedmarshmellows Mar 23, 2026 +7
I love Rutherford so much :D
7
onarainyafternoon Mar 23, 2026 +9
Aww *bears*!
9
roastedmarshmellows Mar 23, 2026 +4
I still can't hear Fred Tatasciore in a role without saying "Baby Bear" in his voice.
4
Coyote_Shepherd Mar 23, 2026 +2
You should have heard the one time that Travis Willingham said it
2
roastedmarshmellows Mar 23, 2026 +3
Oh, Grog... <3
3
Coyote_Shepherd Mar 23, 2026 +3
The perks of both critical role and lower decks sharing Titmouse...and the voice acting community being kind of small at times lol
3
GenGaara25 Mar 23, 2026 +43
Not a hot take. Trek fans will say Lower Decks or SNW are the easy top 2 of the Kurtzman era.
43
TurkeyPhat Mar 23, 2026 +9
With *Prodigy* just chillin nearby burning out the replicator with milkshakes and grilled cheese. Can't believe they tried to bury the most interesting Nu-trek show but some of us haven't forgotten.
9
Salvage570 Mar 23, 2026 +30
It was very unique, and there's just so much Trek culture that they had so much material to work with. Love it, so sad it's done
30
Internal_Wheel_89 Mar 23, 2026 +16
not a hot take at all because it's true.
16
420cat-craft-gamer69 Mar 23, 2026 +8
Somehow Lower Decks was my bf and my introduction into Star Trek and we loved it. We're already on our 3rd rewatch after we went back and finished DS9, the old animated series, and now TNG. There's Soooo many references! Lower Decks feels like a love letter. But we can't stand the new era of live-action trek stuff. :(
8
Enelson4275 Mar 23, 2026 +5
I was a huge trek fan when Lower Decks hit, and my family caught me watching it and decided to watch it with me. When it ended, my wife (not a scifi person at all) says, "Alright, I wanna watch Star Trek i guess. Let's start at the beginning." Went through everything, shows movies, everything from TOS to Discovery besides the OG animated series. She got hooked because of Lower Decks, which will always be hilarious to me because as an existing Trek fan it seemed to be loaded with in-jokes.
5
faultysynapse Mar 23, 2026 +3
It was fun. It was a warm Star Trek blanket when I needed it most. I'm surprised they managed to pull that off while still going absolutely nuts with all the other shows.
3
Qaxar Mar 23, 2026 +3
The best? That would be Prodigy.
3
arahdial Mar 23, 2026 +2
Lower Decks was a love letter to the fans. I'm so glad we got it and wish they'd revisit eventually.
2
windycityinvestor Mar 23, 2026 +18
Lmao. sad because I’d love this IP to come back to its true powerhouse it was. But also happy because f*** Paramount, Ellison family and Alex Kurtzman. kurtzman is a POS and hope he’s fired.
18
ImHully Mar 23, 2026 +2
New Trek was certainly an experiment, but with the exception of the first couple seasons of SNW, I feel like they’ve really missed the mark. When a new show is eventually greenlit, which will surely happen eventually, it needs to be in the vein of the classics. TOS, Next Gen, DS9, and Voyager should be extensively studied and used as the blueprint for the future of Star Trek.
2
ComplexPackage117 Mar 23, 2026 +14
So...Now boot Kurtzman, sheesh.
14
Android1822 Mar 23, 2026 +8
Should have been fired years ago.
8
Icuh8me2 Mar 23, 2026 +33
Man I really tried to get into that show but couldn't make it past a couple episodes.
33
MaximumLongjumping31 Mar 23, 2026 +9
It was so bad.
9
absyrtus Mar 23, 2026 +3
I couldn't even finish the first ep
3
xdamm777 Mar 23, 2026 +6
The writing remained brain dead from beginning to end. I seriously wonder if it was written for an actual audience or just to spite anyone one involved.
6
Glittering-Eye-4416 Mar 23, 2026 +15
I kept watching out of curiosity, not expecting much, and it got much better. The stuff they did in the beginning ending up paying off by the end. I came around to it, so I'm a little sad to see it go, surprising as that is for me.
15
DaveMash Mar 23, 2026 +5
Yeah it was cheesy at the beginning but boy does the tone shift after halfway through. I think that most of the critics didn’t even watch one episode after the first, if at all
5
Xalimata Mar 24, 2026 +2
I thought the Klingon episode was ok. A solid B- episode. And that was the best one.
2
matadorobex Mar 23, 2026 +49
Modern audience failed to show up again
49
fla_john Mar 23, 2026 +18
Where are they getting new fans from? Locking everything behind Paramount+ is just short-sighted. Classic trek should be on Netflix, maybe rotating the series in and out. There was a minute there where TNG was huge with new viewers on Netflix. That could be the gateway to the new shows but they're being greedy.
18
ghostfreckle611 Mar 23, 2026 +3
Looks matter.
3
tedsmitts Mar 23, 2026 +16
I blame that Talaxian Fur-fly.
16
Chyvalri Mar 23, 2026 +3
Don't blame the furfly. It's clearly Specialist Krebs' fault!
3
hindusoul Mar 23, 2026 +7
Good
7
Robot_Was_BMO Mar 23, 2026 +94
Once again, The Orville stands as Star Trek's truest successor. Also Lower Decks.
94
spacetimer81 Mar 23, 2026 +17
Definitely Lower Decks.
17
ElectricPeterTork Mar 23, 2026 +24
Maybe someone'll finally give Seth a bag of money to come in and do Star Trek like he always wanted to. Bonus points if he finds a way to retcon everything from KurtzTrek out. Or at least into its own little pocket universe.
24
Atharaphelun Mar 23, 2026 +14
I'd rather he keep doing the Orville so that he's not beholden to the bad decisions made by Kurtzman Trek shows.
14
Enelson4275 Mar 23, 2026 +7
Lower Decks for me. Orville is great but MacFarlane's achilles heel is that he can't tackle moral philosophy and ethics without presenting one side as fact and using it as a bludgeon against what he sees as ignorance. Roddenberry favored humanism, sure, but the golden era of Trek from TOS to DS9/VOY could at least present opposing viewpoints as worthwhile.
7
izzygonecrazy Mar 24, 2026 +2
I actually liked Strange New Worlds.
2
Bearded_Pip Mar 23, 2026 +21
So why should I watch it Paramount? To me, this is like S3 of Ducktails, if they cancel it prematurely, I’ll skip it.
21
TheUtopianCat Mar 23, 2026 +2
I feel the same way. I watched the first episode, and it didn't click for me. I kept meaning to come back to it, because I heard it was turning out to be great, but I haven't. If it's cancelled, I might not bother. Feels weird, because Star Trek is my forever fandom, and I've watched every episode of all the other series.
2
faultysynapse Mar 23, 2026 +76
That was fast. NuTrek has been absolutely god-awful. 
76
cameroninla Mar 23, 2026 +15
I think the only project I liked was prodigy and it feels bad that the kids show is better than all the live action trek content released by Paramount since discovery.
15
faultysynapse Mar 23, 2026 +5
I haven't yet checked that one out. I did love lower decks though. Whoever they've got writing that show does seem to know what they're doing.
5
hiro111 Mar 23, 2026 +20
I know it's a common sentiment, but it has really been sad to watch the total destruction of a franchise by people who not only don't understand the appeal of the franchise but also seem to actively hate its fans. Picard was a spit in the face to TNG fans, it's like they were trying to piss us off. I don't understand it.
20
thebizkit23 Mar 23, 2026 +35
How the f*** is The Orville still the best "Trek show" in almost over a decade?!
35
grandmofftalkin Mar 23, 2026 +32
Easy, it was made by people who actually liked Star Trek
32
Samurai_Meisters Mar 23, 2026 +3
Also a lot of Star Trek people were involved.
3
FloatingPencil Mar 23, 2026 +44
Can't say I'm sorry to see it go. They've teased an Academy show for years, then when they finally do it it's not even the real Academy, just some reimagining of it way down the line, following on from a show that was divisive at best.
44
Strongest-There-Is Mar 23, 2026 +9
Good. It was awful. I stopped watching it to watch Discovery, which also became awful.
9
monsieurxander Mar 23, 2026 +21
At least they get to write an ending for themselves. I wish that were the norm.
21
MikeKelehan Mar 23, 2026 +37
It's already been filmed.
37
British_Commie Mar 23, 2026 +19
I don’t think they got to write an ending? Just a month ago the showrunners were strongly implying that Season 2 ends on a cliffhanger!!
19
monsieurxander Mar 23, 2026 +6
Oof. Hopefully with advance notice they can do reshoots, or at least salvage it in the edit.
6
Tube_Warmer Mar 23, 2026 +2
Nope. Its already filmed, and I believe some producer said it ended on a cliffhanger.
2
thxpk Mar 23, 2026 +17
I wonder if all the gaslighting and astroturfing will stop now
17
Hspryd Mar 23, 2026 +8
Soon but probably once the season 2 ends. This topic is full of these fake agents glazing that absurd show, like in every topic mentioning STFA. Smart people will see through. Saying it outloud for those who don't know, most of them are not real peeps, they're astroturfers.
8
Android1822 Mar 23, 2026 +5
When the advertising check ends, it will magically go away.
5
PatchyWhiskers Mar 23, 2026 +8
Makes sense, my kid likes everything Star Trek and she hated this.
8
Ada_Pearce Mar 23, 2026 +4
You can't take the sky from me Kurtzman, we'll always have 90s trek 
4
Expensive_Rhubarb_87 Mar 23, 2026 +4
Here's to hoping Kurtzman's new deal keeps him MILES away from Trek. Spent way to much time going, "man, really?" at too many different points in Trek lately.
4
Cheezycake117 Mar 23, 2026 +4
Man I just want to see a show around the USS Enterprise NCC-1701-J
4
MacSteele13 Mar 23, 2026 +4
We're canceling the show, but only after one more season! Mixed blessing
4
hyperspaceslider Mar 23, 2026 +2
The film is already in the can. Might as well complete post processing and release it
2
m19010101 Mar 23, 2026 +20
Good riddance. Show was absolutely awful.
20
True_Pirate Mar 23, 2026 +48
Lolololololololololololololololol…but um…..it was supposed to appeal to new viewers. I was told I was just old and didn’t get it. What could have happened?
48
MudReasonable8185 Mar 23, 2026 +10
Paramount: this isn’t for you classic trek fans, we want to appeal to young people Classic trek fans: ok I won’t watch it then Young people: why would I care about an IP that was relevant for the baby boomers and Gen X? Paramount: we’re cancelling this as no one watched it
10
Solemn-Philosopher Mar 23, 2026 +20
I am not a hater of what is sometimes called "Nu-Trek". I liked Prodigy, Strange New Worlds, the first two seasons of Discovery, and Picard Season 3. That being said, it really has been a complete miss over the past year with the Section 31 film and Starfleet Academy. I watched the first two episodes of Academy and it just wasn't for me. Too much melodrama and silliness (in my opinion).
20
sgthombre Mar 23, 2026 +27
Prodigy is weird in that it's a cartoon show meant for kids but it takes its story and Star Trek as a setting far more seriously than Starfleet Academy does. Easily a better show.
27
TurelSun Mar 23, 2026 +5
Prodigy was very silly? It was good but still very silly.
5
meatball77 Mar 23, 2026 +8
I mean there was an entire character who was a slimy blob who ate ship parts who then went into a metamorphosis into a squaling slimy toddler who somehow was able to join starfleet to train to be a security officer even though he doesn't talk (except to the whale one time).
8
TurkeyPhat Mar 23, 2026 +3
Yeah I imagine the visual style of *Prodigy* puts so many people off. Personally the weird 3d/cg type deal isn't something I'd bother with but I was happy I did after watching it.
3
OK_Human Mar 23, 2026 +2
Your likes of the recent shows almost mirror mine. If I ever have paramount plus size again, I'll have to check out Prodigy
2
Solemn-Philosopher Mar 23, 2026 +5
I think Prodigy is worth the time. It actually continues stories from the TNG and Voyager era.
5
IGotMussels Mar 23, 2026 +2
Lol they removed it from Paramount plus back when they canceled. But is should be on Netflix I think.
2
OrlandoLasso Mar 23, 2026 +6
Not surprising when they couldn't even copy the quote from The Drumhead right.  It was annoying when they kept showing people from Cheron but never explained how they survived.
6
cozzy121 Mar 23, 2026 +5
how the hell does it get a 2nd season?
5
HasSomeSelfEsteem Mar 23, 2026 +15
Please, god, take Star Trek away from corporate and give it back to the political science majors and the Shakespeareans. I don’t give a f*** about doomsday weapon plots I want to see actors thunder away about morality and the dignity of life.
15
NachoNutritious Mar 23, 2026 +33
Star Trek is in its current state specifically because it was fully turned over to theater kids instead of actual fans of science fiction.
33
ElectricPeterTork Mar 23, 2026 +12
Nerds write the shows, Shakespearian actors chew scenery and play to the balconies while they perform the impossible dialog. That was something that pre-NuTrek had... the leads were all originally theater actors. And they still played the roles like they were in the Theater. Especially Avery Brooks. But putting the words in their mouths were the sci-fi nerds.
12
HasSomeSelfEsteem Mar 23, 2026 +3
I said Shakespeareans, not theater kids. Patrick Stewart is a stage actor, but he's not a theater kid.
3
Internal_Wheel_89 Mar 23, 2026 +67
Not a popular opinion on this subreddit, but I really liked the show and am sad it's been cancelled. I'm still on the lookout for a high quality replica of the varsity letter jackets.
67
ImpossibleGuardian Mar 23, 2026 +29
I think the marketing did it a disservice. A Discovery follow up, particularly something seemingly YA-focused, was always going to be a tougher sell to fans who didn’t enjoy the former show. That said I was really pleasantly surprised by it, particularly how they managed to not fall into the same writing and storytelling traps that Discovery did constantly throughout its run. You could genuinely feel the passion that SFA’s writers have for Star Trek and its values, which was ironic given how much people complained about how anti-Trek it appeared before it aired. I’d sincerely encourage anyone on the fence to give it a go.
29
Silly-avocatoe Mar 24, 2026 +3
Really enjoying gina yashere and tig notaro in their roles too. 
3
The_Bitter_Bear Mar 23, 2026 +10
It's had some great episodes and even with it being a teen/ya drama I've really enjoyed it.  Really the episodes that I've not liked as much have been the ones dealing with Caleb/Nus Braka. It just feels a like they are trying to make Caleb way too important. The students have been in way too much real conflict in my opinion and they have had to have them do some really silly things to create the situations. When it's been about the school and the other characters I've found it great. 
10
Justaguyfromnc2023 Mar 23, 2026 +6
Good it was such a shit show how I want TNG back in some form or another that is actually good.
6
RSomnambulist Mar 23, 2026 +3
I consider this a win, honestly. As much as I'm concerned about the future of Trek, this show, and most of the rest, did not understand their key audience, and chased after a new one with no idea how to appeal to young people.
3
Fyfaenerremulig Mar 23, 2026 +5
“I ate my com badge!” Jesus Christ
5
Only_Dragonfruit_117 Mar 23, 2026 +2
It got a season 2!
2
dgdfthr Mar 23, 2026 +2
It should.
2
colonelc4 Mar 23, 2026 +2
They are financing another one ? Daaaamn 😳
2
Weak-Excuse3060 Mar 23, 2026 +2
Well atleast we have a Stargate revival to look forward to now while Trek rests for who knows how long.
2
Aazzle Mar 23, 2026 +2
Half a few month ago I was voted down massively cause i told the financial reasons: "So its clear there won't be any new series in particular after the takeover by Skydance and permanently loss making of all productions of the New Trek Era. The removal of Discovery, Lower Decks and Prodigy were clear signals to the shareholders to hold out until they could get rid of those responsible without suffering further losses. At least now all rights for TV and cinema are finally under one roof, which can only do the franchise good overall. I also bet Academy will be cancelled after the first or second season at the latest, as it is Paramount's last legacy. The ongoing contracts and production simply could not be stopped before without loss. But Ellison has already announced that the future of Star Trek is under him in the cinema only and that he sees the continuation of the Into Darkness era, which was already co-produced by Skydance or a realignment in the form of a full reboot of the franchise as the only future. And slowly I think it can only get better or would benefit the franchise more than the current irritations. After all, Skydance is known as a producer of Apple's top content such as Foundation, Amazon's The Expanse, or old classics such as Babylon 5, Dr. Who, Battlestar Galactica, or Stargate SG1 and Atlantis and even the x files."
2
cr4d Mar 23, 2026 +2
While it got better toward the end, I'm surprised they got a S2.
2
imabagofmostlywater Mar 24, 2026 +2
Hopeful this means Kurtzman is being shown the door.
2
Shinagami091 Mar 24, 2026 +2
Should have ended with the pilot episode to the executives.
2
← Back to Board