He kind of is fixing the economy. Until the Iran War started we were seeing some positive markers indication economic recovery. On top of that the cost of government borrowing has gone down since the Tories and stayed down showing that the markets have confidence in Labours economic policies.
Unfortunately our economy was in dire straits due to a decade of mismanagement exacserbated by geopolitical events like covid and the war in Ukraine. And now just as we were starting to see some positive change the war with Iran has driven inflation up across the globe.
171
Environmental_Tap1624 days ago
+26
I'm not sure that many people actually care about the Internet stuff aside from people who are online a lot, ie the listnook population. From memory polls were broadly in support of the Online Safety Bill because parents concerned about children out number people that care about online anonymity.
26
timwaaagh4 days ago
+7
If that group consists of mostly loyal tory or other party voters that isnt going to help him though. He has to do things that interest those who switched to labour last time around not just do whatever has a majority
7
StoneColdAM4 days ago
+6
A lot of liberals around the world have responded to risks of right wing populism by just wagging their fingers and not actually making meaningful changes voters want. Sometimes it works to win elections but eventually people get tired and want to see positive changes towards affordability and their lifestyle in the ways government can influence those things.
6
Barrel1234 days ago
+20
Dum dum take
I promise this time nigel / brexit 2 will work !
It is no wonder why the extreme right is on the rise in the world when morons hear them say they'll fix the economy by blaming everyone else
Then when the economy isnt fixed and things like the nhs get gutted even more, and the economy worsens, people remain ignorant and act as if the conservative / far right parties somehow "reformed" from the last time they tried to blame everyone else
20
boat_hamster4 days ago
Yeah. In the UK we haven't seen a meaningful improvement in living standards since 2007. And young adults are a lot worse off now than young adults were before 2007.
We voted in Labour because we wanted change and hope, and Labour have delivered very little change, and offered no hope.
0
Dougalishere4 days ago
+16
and we think the guys that cant even run a council properly are gonna improve living standards across the country... come on man. Change and hope from what is basically Maga 2.0? Are we seeing change and hope in the states right now? If Reform take the general our country is fucked
16
boat_hamster4 days ago
+1
Well obviously Reform aren't the answer, unless the question is who are those racists pricks. But I can understand people taking a punt on the Greens, although obviously they'd be a disaster in charge too.
We need competence. But competence hasn't been on the ballot paper since the Blair days, and he had other war crimey issues,
1
VEMODMASKINEN4 days ago
+15
How long did it take to f*** up your economy again? And for how long have Labour been in charge?
You guys deserve the shitty economy for being so god damn dumb.
Just like how the US deserves every shitty thing that's happening to them currently.
15
The_Artist_Who_Mines4 days ago
+3
Maybe do 5 minutes of reading on any topic you decide to comment on
3
FergingtonVonAwesome4 days ago
+5
This is part of the issue though. I don't think the current government has done enough, but what they have done, they haven't publicised at all. The renters reform act came in this month. If it wasn't for posts on Listnook about evictions, I would have had no idea! It's a genuinely positive thing, lots of labour critics would approve of, there should be someone on every podcast/TV show bigging it up, but there's been hardly anything.
5
Crawk_Bro4 days ago
-6
Sad to say but the internet bullshit polls well with people.
-6
drivingagermanwhip4 days ago
+26
not that well, evidently
26
Crawk_Bro4 days ago
+7
Local elections aren't a referendum on one particular policy.
7
drivingagermanwhip4 days ago
+11
i mean yeah but the general message seems to be that everyone thinks starmer sucks ass
11
Crawk_Bro4 days ago
-5
Obviously that is the sentiment. But dropping the OSA as suggested by the original comment would have no impact on that.
-5
drivingagermanwhip4 days ago
+8
It'd impress me and I'm a voter
8
Crawk_Bro4 days ago
Unfortunately for us, people who hold actual liberal views in this country are a rare commodity.
0
drivingagermanwhip4 days ago
+1
Yes but I don't think it helps people to talk about national consensus, particularly when politics is so volatile at the moment and if anything is clear about party politics in Britain, it's that no party represents a national consensus currently.
Personally I think now is the time to think clearly about what we stand for and what we want to see, because Reform are extremely clear on what they want from their end. I know there are people with strong other opinions out there, but it's important that we don't treat public opinion as a given because afterall, we're the public as much as anyone else is.
1
Crawk_Bro4 days ago
+1
> we're the public as much as anyone else is
On a numbers basis this just isn't true. The UK population is largely conservative with a not insignificant authoritarian streak, most people here fundamentally want the government to tell them what they can and can't do.
Liberalism was one of the best things to develop in this country but unfortunately it never really filtered down to the majority of the population.
1
[deleted]4 days ago
+2
[deleted]
2
Crawk_Bro4 days ago
+1
That hasn't happened though.
1
[deleted]4 days ago
+2
[deleted]
2
Crawk_Bro4 days ago
+1
You got a source for that? The only leak of private info I've seen was from Discord, and that was from Australia's system.
1
[deleted]4 days ago
+2
[deleted]
2
Crawk_Bro4 days ago
+1
Fair enough, I hadn't heard of that.
Regardless it hasn't seemed to impact the support for the OSA given this poll from March: https://yougov.com/en-gb/articles/54405-eight-months-on-three-quarters-of-britons-still-support-online-age-verification-laws
1
[deleted]4 days ago
+1
[deleted]
1
Crawk_Bro4 days ago
+1
Exactly, so we can circle back to my original point that Starmer backing off from it would make no difference to his prospects. Glad we can agree on that.
1
xParesh4 days ago
-18
But that might fix the record levels of unemployment and reduce the tax burden on workers to pay for vanity political projects that no one knew they were voting for when they voted Labour in
-18
Angrylettuce4 days ago
+26
What vanity project is Starmer running currently lol
26
FergingtonVonAwesome4 days ago
+2
Yea, honestly id welcome a big overly ambitious vanity project! Atleast that would be doing something.
2
R7ype4 days ago
+11
The levels of breathtaking fiction that get thrown around about Labour...
Do you intentionally get up and decide to fabricate stuff or does it just happen?
11
Crawk_Bro4 days ago
+20
Unemployment is nowhere near record levels. And what vanity projects are you referring to? I swear you people live in a fantasy land and just say any old shit that comes to your mind.
20
Lain_Staley4 days ago
+64
A reminder to Americans. Starmer has lower popularity polls than Bush in 2007 and Nixon during Watergate.
64
ydktbh4 days ago
+42
another reminder, Farage is probably as popular as Trump was. And we all know how that worked out
42
m15otw4 days ago
+11
He's also stood and lost in a _lot_ of national elections over the years.
11
drivingagermanwhip4 days ago
+6
The issue is reform are the only party with a dedicated following. I looked at places they got in and about 15% of registered voters supported them. Every traditional party has betrayed their entire voting base in recent living memory
They also have a huge boost from GB news these days
6
YOSHIMIvPROBOTS4 days ago
+18
Nixon and Watergate spanned years. He even got overwhelmingly re-elected during Watergate. And in 2007, the bottom hadn't fallen out of the economy yet. I'm not saying Starmer is popular, but those aren't really saying anything.
18
Pm7I34 days ago
+1
Watergate is so weird to me
1
YOSHIMIvPROBOTS4 days ago
+3
There's a great doc BBC/Discovery made about it in the '90s. I got super into Watergate b/c I thought it would be a roadmap to the downfall of the Trump admin. Alas, I didn't know the GOP would become completely unmoored to decency.
3
GoodIdea3214 days ago
-6
That seems lower than it should be, but I haven't paid that close of attention to what's happening in the UK.
Do prime ministers regularly reach those lows?
-6
Bogdanovist_Rebel4 days ago
+7
They change PMs a lot. The Tories went through like 4 last term.
7
GoodIdea3214 days ago
+2
I know that, but on polling numbers I have no clue. I'll look it up.
2
nerdyPagaman4 days ago
+6
UK here.
Ignore most of what's been reported.
Politics is fracturing, with lots of parties.
Reform, Labour, lib dems, greens, conservatives.
These are the "big 5". If the vote splits evenly then 20% support is equivalent to 50% if you only have 2 parties.
Reform is on 25% which means everyone else is lower.
Starmer is unpopular, he keeps on making bad decisions, but the real story is the growth of the other parties.
These elections were about choosing whose in charge of the local councils, in some areas.
So it's an opportunity for everyone to have a protest and vote however they want.
At a general election people tend to vote tactically so they'll do things like "vote Labour to stop reform". We really need to have a STV voting system now.
6
AffectionateRub18574 days ago
+2
In first past the post system. Isnt it in the interst of political parties to form alliances. Like if the green party comes in third everywhere couldnt they end up with close to zero seats with about 15% of the vote. I am asking because i am fairly ignorant of UK politics
2
nerdyPagaman4 days ago
+2
Yes, but up until now the 2 traditional "big" parties of Labour / conservative have both just said
"vote Reform, get Labour so vote Conservative" and
"vote green / lib dem get conservative so vote Labour" that's been more beneficial to those parties than pacts / alliances.
It's really squeezed the smaller parties out.
2
AuroraHalsey4 days ago
+1
Yes, and it has happened in the past (in 2019 the Brexit Party agreed not to contest 317 Tory seats), but now the parties are all too close together in polling for any of them to be willing to stand down candidates for an alliance.
1
GoodIdea3214 days ago
Thanks. In some ways I'm a little jealous of that system, despite being an American, and not liking what is happening with UK politics.
0
nerdyPagaman4 days ago
+3
Well hopefully we get STV single transferable vote.
So you just number your preferences.
25% Support reform, which is another way of saying 75% don't like the far right.
3
ConcentrateDirect5234 days ago
-7
Yeah.... if he's so bad why don't we just trade heads of state?
-7
qiaozhina4 days ago
+12
Hes not our head of state.
12
oath2order4 days ago
+196
Starmer under pressure, as UK voters refuse to accept that it is impossible to solve the decade-long country's problems caused by the Tories (that they kept voting in)
196
ChemicalNo28783 days ago
+11
People love Short term half solutions that kicks the can down the road. Not a shock that people today have less empathy for the future generations.
11
demmka4 days ago
-19
When Labour were offering up leaders like Ed Milliband and Jeremy Corbyn as an alternative to the Conservatives, it’s no wonder people said “no thanks” and stuck with the Tories.
Edit - you can downvote all you want. If the option is Tory or man who called terrorists his “friends” which do you think most ordinary people are going to pick?
-19
TheFuzzball4 days ago
+35
Quite right. The Conservative Party has only ever put forward the most esteemed and high quality leadership.
35
loreleiofthefungi3 days ago
+7
Maybe stop eating the media slop?
7
demmka3 days ago
+2
You can call it media slop all you want, it literally happened.
2
loreleiofthefungi3 days ago
+2
Keep telling yourself that. No one is immune to propaganda
2
demmka3 days ago
He apologised for it, my guy.
0
xParesh4 days ago
-68
That’s a really silly take on this.
Can you explain their endless u-turns and lack of economic literacy that has lead to record levels of unemployment and highest tax burdens while they were happy to implement unnecessary political project to reward the workless on the back of workers?
If you really want to just say Labour = good and opposition = bad then fine but you’re then missing the whole reason why the government is wildly unpopular
-68
Late_Stage_Exception4 days ago
+96
The guys not saying “labour=good”, he’s saying that voters have the attention span of gnats and often want deeply entrenched and complicated problems fixed RIGHT AWAY, regardless of how long those problems took to create. You can’t really fix the issues from Blair onward with one government, but yet voters seem eager to put the dudes who royally fucked Britain (brexit) in power to…do it quicker this time?
96
eorlingas_riders4 days ago
+37
Pretty much similar issue we have in the US. Republicans spend 4 years ratfucking the economy.
Democrats can’t really do anything they want to do because all their attention is on fixing the problem, so when their term comes to end people are like “why didn’t you do what you said”.
Also not saying that democrats were great or would have accomplished more, but things take time to fix… and most voters expect when someone takes power to fix everything immediately while also delivering every campaign promise.
37
Mankankosappo4 days ago
+30
> endless u-turns
They announce a policy that wasnt in their manifesto -> People dont like it -> They scrap the policy.
Its shocking to me how we have we turned the government listening to the people they govern into a negative thing.
> economic literacy that has lead to record levels of unemployment and highest tax burdens
Their economic literacy is up for debate. Relative low cost for government borrowing would suggest that the markets have confidence in the UKs economy. Something we didn't have under a lot of the previous government. Although the Iran War has sullied that unfortunately.
Unemployment is high but some of thag is driven by external factors. The rise of AI and offshoring has hit service economies (which includes the UK) hard.
30
Mailman74 days ago
-9
Borrowing rates are higher than they were under Liz Truss…
-9
Mankankosappo4 days ago
+11
Context is important here though. Truss mini budget on the back of covid saw gilt yields increase massively. We started seeing these fall once labour got into power and after each budget they fell further which showed market trust in the labour economy.
Unfortunately some fuckwit decided to attack Iran and destroy most of the economic gains the Labour government were making. Although following Starmers statement today we've already started to see a drop in gilt yeild rates again showing that the markets like the Labour government.
There is a general trend of recovery when looking at economoc metrics since labour have come into power. Unfortunately because of a decade of mismanagement, and multiple international incidents recovery is slow. But just because its not happening fast doesn't mean its not happening and doesnt mean we should just nuke our economy because were bored.
11
nathtendo4 days ago
-15
What about all the pedophile scandals in labour? And Starmers frankly disgusting remarks about the grooming gang scandal.
-15
Mankankosappo4 days ago
+5
I dont know Starmer's grooming gang remarks. As far as I know the grooming gangs scandal was mostly the Tories (many of whom have since defected to Reform)
Paedophile scandals. Again as far as I know theres just the one with the Mendelson drama. On that, hiring Mendelson for the US ambassadorship was a good move due to his prior relationship with Trump. As long as Starmer and Labour leadership didn't know that Mendelsom was a nonce them I'm not personally bothered by it. Now if it turns out they hired him knowing he was a nonce and turned a blind eye then that would sour my opinion greatly.
And just for context I am not happy with everything labour have done. I think theyve made quite a few missteps. But the numbers are showing improvement and I dont think theres any other political party atm the moment that would be better (even though I really wish there were)
5
nathtendo3 days ago
You admit you don't know what you are talking about, but keep spewing nonsense.
0
solipsischizo4 days ago
+100
how the f*** are britons backing a human shit rag in nigel farage
100
Federal_Bonus_20994 days ago
+47
I don’t know, but it feels like I have joined a club that enjoys getting kicked in the nuts over and over
47
Alkavana4 days ago
+34
Especially after Reform shit the bed with the councils they've already ran. How anyone is looking at them and thinking, 'yeah, they'll run my area well', is beyond me.
34
Key_Pop_7013 days ago
+3
My council is greens and run like shit
3
Petaurus_australis2 days ago
+1
Politics here in Australia are analogous and our greens party runs my local council. They decided to change bin collection from 1 to 2 weeks for general waste (while increasing rate costs) to encourage people disposing of less plastic and non-recyclable waste in general, but the thing is, no change has been made for supermarkets and packaging laws in the country, so supermarkets are just putting more unavoidable waste on shit while you have less room to dispose of it and most c**** foods you are often necessitated to buy because of cost of living are also packaged in general waste. When you have a household like mine, where its more than one single adults worth of waste, then you just run out of bin space and you have no idea what to do with it. While I am an avid environmentalist, its the failure of basic execution and operationalisation that causes a major headache from such a party, I mean if they can't even make basic decisions like that work, and mess up basic statistics at a federal level, its a major deterrent to even consider them as an eligible candidate for my vote, good intentions don't make up for ignorance and stupidity.
1
Nilmor4 days ago
+4
Facts and context don’t matter anymore, Reform have 1 clear agenda and the uninformed are falling for the grift
4
[deleted]4 days ago
+10
[removed]
10
crowwreak4 days ago
+4
Labour and Reform actually have very similar stated policies on immigration, it's just that Nigel is better at the "hey, if you hate immigrants vote for us" messaging
4
5Hjsdnujhdfu8nubi4 days ago
+4
For "not having a policy" they've brought it down to pre-Brexit levels within a couple of years.
4
[deleted]4 days ago
+3
[removed]
3
5Hjsdnujhdfu8nubi4 days ago
+8
The public [doesn't even think immigration has went down, nor that it's Labour's doing when told it has.](https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/jan/10/two-thirds-of-uk-voters-wrongly-think-immigration-is-rising-poll-finds)
Labour's main losses were split votes between them, Greens and Lib-Dems, the former of which has a policy closer to open borders than closed.
They didn't lose *to* Reform, Reform just had a much more consolidated voting base.
8
[deleted]4 days ago
-5
[removed]
-5
[deleted]4 days ago
+3
[removed]
3
[deleted]4 days ago
+4
[removed]
4
[deleted]4 days ago
+6
[removed]
6
The_Grand_Briddock4 days ago
+11
That's the neat thing, they're not. Reform only took around 25% of the vote.
Labour's vote has just collapsed and gone to the four other left-leaning parties. If any party recovers, they'd blow past Reform quite easily. Everyone who will support Farage is supporting Farage, his numbers won't go down, it's all about the opposition rallying behind one banner.
11
chunrichichi4 days ago
+19
[https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c042pp15vkkt](https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c042pp15vkkt)
If you look at the seat gain/loss, its quite clear that lost tory seats don't come close to accounting for reform's gains. Clearly, a significant portion of labour's vote has gone to reform, probably more than what they have lost to the greens and lib dems.
19
Rmtcts4 days ago
+1
A slight difference, but a bigger proportion is labour voters have decided it's not worth voting and a portion of the electorate who normally doesn't vote is coming out to support reform.
Essentially the same thing but it would explain why Labour echoing reform policy and rhetoric has done nothing for their popularity.
1
Traditional_Speech922 days ago
+2
Its all about illegal immigration.
The UK is being swarmed by criminals and you’ve got 2 parties seemingly willing to do anything drastic about it. (One if then didn’t run in these elections).
Also, all the authoritarian stuff from labour.
Also, labour’s inability to shout loud about the GOOD stuff they’ve done, most of which they pledged they’d do. That, or the other parties are shouting louder and smearing them.
2
R7ype4 days ago
-1
Its the same wankers who still think Brexit will work out, just got to "do it proper innit"
-1
Key_Pop_7013 days ago
Because he is far better than shit we have put up with for decades espeicially starmer,blair
0
Quality_Controller4 days ago
+106
Look at the turn out for the polls. Most of them are around 30-40%. Most people can't even be bothered to vote in this country, so it means the Reform lunatics (that do actually vote) are now gaining power. People just like to get angry about things and complain instead of trying to do something about it.
You can't expect Labour to undo all the damage of our previous long stretch of Conservative leaders in such a short space of time. This is a decade of shit they have to repair.
106
rw8904 days ago
+47
Local elections always have a way lower turnout. I’m willing to bet that at least half of the 60+% that didn’t vote didn’t know about it, and the other half are apathetic because local elections have very little impact on day to day life.
47
chunrichichi4 days ago
+8
Turn out has actually been a significantly higher than the last local election.
8
lordnastrond4 days ago
+69
He's done and so are Labour.
They want to save Britain (and their own legacies)?
Fix our broken voting system, get rid of First Past The Post and implement Proportional Representation.
69
Nights_Harvest4 days ago
+93
There is always something each person sees as most important issue.
Labour has strenghtened renters rights,workers rights, got rid of heriditary lord peerage, before attack on Iran UK economy was performing really well and still is considering the turbulance. Accelerated investments into renewable.
There is a lot labour has done that is not reported by mass media.
During times like this, especially during times like this everyone has different priorities, different issues are important to them. They have made propositions, society hated them so they binned it but for whatever reason media calls it a u turn, as if listening to the country is a sign of weakness.
They could do more in terms of taxing actual wealth instead of working people.
93
PotsAndPandas4 days ago
+8
Yup. Single Transferrable Vote would solve so many problems.
8
MerryKookaburra4 days ago
I keep seeing results and my first instict is to say, just wait until preferences and then panic
But you poms still do fptp which is so shocking considering the party spread.
Im worried though as UK facist laws translate easier for Australian facist wannabes
0
m15otw4 days ago
+1
This was only local elections - no fascists will be writing any laws (other than the ones already in Westminster).
1
nishitd4 days ago
+19
I'm not from England so I fall to understand what Brits see in Nigel Farage. He has even less charisma than Starmer, which I didn't even think was possible. Please explain this to me
19
Timbershoe4 days ago
+30
For nearly a century the U.K. has had a two party system.
They are told to vote ‘tactically’ as a vote for a smaller party is a vote for ‘insert the opposition party’. This has lead to voter frustration.
Last election Conservatives were voted out as people lost trust in their shitshow. Then Labour came in on Conservative policies and voters had few options.
A vote for either Labour or Conservatives achieves the same thing.
So the majority of people didn’t vote. Those that did changed votes to the Green Party, Liberal Democrat and reform.
Labour voters tend to think of themselves as left wing, however Labour won the last election by a slim margin on a right wing manifesto. Cutting benefits. Reducing immigration. Increasing defence spending. Banning online p***.
There is an almost direct correlation between the voters Labour lost and the voters Reform gained. Because Reform are more right wing (although technically they have no policies and are just out for themselves) and pulled the racist votes from Labour.
Reform also has considerable funding from billionaires like Musk, the social media giants have been pushing them. Musk even paid thousands for people to travel to protests, So online they appear to be much more legitimate than they are. The technocrats have realised they could take control of countries, and appear to be keen to do so.
That’s my read, anyway.
30
nishitd4 days ago
+12
Thank you. Based on what you're saying, this reads similar phenomenon to "Trump attracting Bernie voters".
12
Timbershoe4 days ago
+4
Sort of, yes, there are a significant portion of the population who just want change. Like Bernie voters going to trump.
So like the U.S. the massive voter apathy, racism and an unpopular government opened the door for social media to sway your grandparents.
On the plus side, the U.K. appears to no longer be a two party state and smaller parties are now gaining significant votes. On the down side the major gain was a party run by corrupt fucksticks.
4
Ravenblade7274 days ago
+8
This isn't quite it... firstly, Labour won the last election by a landslide. They have a huge majority. Secondly, while its tempting to assume they're losing voters to Reform, the numbers lost that way are only about 5% of those who voted for them last time out. Thy have lost a combined 30% to other left wing parties.
The issue at the moment is that theyre being punished by the left for having leaned right. Its splitting the left wing voters considerably and Reform is capitalising on that with voters who were more likely to be previous Tory voters than Labour ones.
This is recoverable, but ironically Labour needs to move left, not right.
8
Timbershoe4 days ago
+4
\>This isn't quite it...
It’s all personal opinion at this point, we don’t have much data to work in.
\>firstly, Labour won the last election by a landslide.
Careful. They didn’t gain a significant % of votes over the previous two elections, they won with the lowest % of votes of any general election. First past the post voting won them a majority.
What we know is Labour was about as popular in the last election as the previous two when they lost. Which is a very tenuous position.
\>They have a huge majority.
Of seats, due to first past the post, they do not have anything near a majority of voters.
\>Secondly, while it’s tempting to assume they're losing voters to Reform, the numbers lost that way are only about 5% of those who voted for them last time out. Thy have lost a combined 30% to other left wing parties.
It’s near impossible to say which voters switched to where.
What we know is reform gained 1442 councillors and Labour lost 1406. Those numbers seem pretty linked.
Conservatives lost 557 councillors, Liberal Democrat’s, Green Party and Independents won 552 seats. Again those numbers seem pretty linked.
\>The issue at the moment is that theyre being punished by the left for having leaned right.
I disagree that Labour is left wing, it hasn’t been left since the 70’s. Centrist, perhaps. Corbyn tried to move them left and it was deeply unpopular with Labour voters.
\>This is recoverable, but ironically Labour needs to move left, not right.
I don’t agree they need to go left. That doesn’t seem to be what the public want, and they will be competing with actual left wing parties like Green and Liberal Democrat’s, while losing the older xenophobic voters to reform.
It’s time to admit there is a strong racist undercurrent in the U.K. and a significant portion of traditional Labour voters (working class, unionists, council estates etc) have racist views. The painting of St George’s flags on roundabouts happened in majority Labour seats, that can’t be ignored.
I personally feel they need to deal with reform head on. Labour, conservatives, Green Party and Liberal Democrat’s need to be unified in preventing the threat of Reform. This will be a shit show if they continue to ignore public sentiment and try Corbyn’s policies again.
4
[deleted]4 days ago
+1
[deleted]
1
Timbershoe4 days ago
I have no idea what Starmer’s view on previous UK elections is.
And yes, I’ve seen the voting over the previous years.
Do you have any point to make? A different point of view?
0
drivingagermanwhip4 days ago
+1
My point is that I'm fed up of 'sensible' people on line telling actual people who live in former labour heartlands what they think.
I didn't vote for Keir because he's a huge racist who wants to copy Denmark's immigration policy and thinks that will cement his power. I want a party that strengthens our diverse communities and looks to build a Britain that treats people with justice and doesn't just cynically stoke divisions.
New labour was dreadful for our communities. Growing up in Stoke huge numbers of homes were knocked down because labour were trying to force house prices up. It didn't work and people I knew were destitute.
Keir tried to do new Labour again. Everyone remembers new Labour. It was awful.
Reform won lots of seats because now it's possible to win seats with about 10-15% of the voters supporting you. That's on Keir and the rest of the wannabe Blairs.
1
Timbershoe4 days ago
I’m sorry.
You’re saying you didn’t vote for Labour councillors (it was a local election, not a general) because you think Kier Starmer is racist?
Instead you voted for Reform, who are card carrying racists?
Or am I misreading your reply?
0
drivingagermanwhip4 days ago
+1
I voted Green. They got in
A lot of people didn't vote labour for various reasons. New new labour have created a labour party that has spent its time trying to eject anyone with a left wing view and the other parties aren't very big (green), very left wing (lib dem) or absolutely wrecked living standards in recent memory (the conservatives) so no else is really getting many votes. It's a divide and conquer thing for reform.
1
Timbershoe4 days ago
+1
I think we all know the Green Party is more left wing than the Liberal Democrats.
But at least you didn’t vote reform.
I don’t think I agree with your theory on new labour, in fact I suspect you’re pushing that angle as you would like a far more left wing government in general. Which is fine, however that isn’t what the general public are aligned with.
It is clearly and demonstrably true that the general public are moving to right wing politics with Reform. Saying ‘hey why don’t we try socialism’ is a bold statement and I appreciate the effort, however it’s not going to win over those that have gone reform.
But good luck, I hope I’m wrong.
1
art-love-social3 days ago
+1
100% this.
1
rw8904 days ago
+20
Current system has failed people. Globalisation left seaside and rural towns behind, punished uneducated. Farage has been messaging for decades that the problem is the EU and immigration. Consistent messaging that aligns with a bunch of media owners so he gets attention. People feel poor and he’s given them someone to blame.
20
FloatingPencil4 days ago
+10
It’s not just Farage pushing the message though. It’s when people are told they’re not supposed to mind mass immigration and any concerns are racist. Someone says “Hey wait a minute. What’s up with the large group of African men intimidating women in my town centre?” and suddenly they’re the villain. So someone with ‘a few concerns’ gets progressively more pissed off that nobody is listening. And some of those people eventually will switch their vote because maybe, just maybe, the new guy will listen.
Doesn’t mean Reform have a f****** clue but that’s what I see from the people I know who’ve switched. Former Labour voters, every one.
10
The_Artist_Who_Mines4 days ago
-6
No that's incorrect. that's russian propaganda, the same that farage pays for to fund his politics.
-6
aMesmeriZe4 days ago
+7
What is Russian propaganda? That people are seeing the demographic transformation of towns with their own eyes?
7
FloatingPencil4 days ago
+2
And that right there is why people are moving toward Reform. “You aren’t seeing what you’re seeing, ignore the evidence of your own eyes”.
2
art-love-social3 days ago
+1
The number of returnees under the Dublin agreement was pathetically small - between 7-10%
1
danmw4 days ago
What I find hilarious is theres a big overlap with brexit voters and reform voters. And brexit is precisely the thing thats caused our current immigration problems.
When we were in the EU we were part of the Dublin agreement which allows members to send immigrants back to the country where they first entered the EU. We no longer have this avenue open to us.
0
MetalBawx4 days ago
+1
No that makes sense in a sick, sad way.
Brexit was carried out by the Tory party and Farage has repeatedly blamed them for it's failure. That's the spin that those voting Reform tell themselves, they didn't get taken for a ride. The Tories betrayed them and fucked it up.
Anything to avoid admitting they've been had.
1
BookmarksBrother4 days ago
+5
Thats easy. Its about migration
5
JustCopyingOthers3 days ago
+2
It's a protest vote. No one really cares who runs their county council, few know what it does, where it's powers start and end.
2
wraithforge4 days ago
+12
All they had to do was not f*** up.
12
Pm7I34 days ago
Genuinely, my reaction has been "my expectations were low but holy shit".
0
zokka_son_of_zokka4 days ago
+3
>now just watch Labour squander the next four years for another fifteen years of Cons.
me, July 5, 2024. I didn't want to be right...
3
RavenRegime4 days ago
+5
As someone who rememebered they gave teenagers the right to vote but then still passed OSA what the f*** did they think was going to happen?
5
5Hjsdnujhdfu8nubi4 days ago
+3
The voting age hasn't been lowered yet and the OSA receives majority support when polled in-person. No party is against it either, so you can't exactly swap off Labour to pick someone else.
3
imaginary_num6er4 days ago
Only a matter a time before another Pro-Putin Putinite Providing Pure Political Power Promoting Putin
0
CthulhuWatchesMe4 days ago
+6
P for Pendetta
6
drivingagermanwhip4 days ago
+2
if you're trying to start a cult of personality, you have to have one
2
Athrul4 days ago
I really wish there was some accountability in modern politics. Seems like all these guys so is mess c*** up for regular people, tell these regular people that times are going to be tough but if we (i.e. not them) put in enough work we can make it through this, and then they don't face any consequences.
Imagine if a regular employee messed up this badly.
0
Got_Engineers4 days ago
-7
What if the UK stopped arresting all the pensioners and 85 year old grandmothers for peacefully protesting?
-7
drivingagermanwhip4 days ago
-2
Love when centrists chime in to say 'left wing policies aren't popular'.
Don't think you're in a position to say what gets votes lads. Labour votes increased under Ed Miliband and wildly increased under Jeremy Corbyn, before slumping to 2005 levels under Starmer.
Maybe it's your political project that's unpopular nonsense?
-2
art-love-social3 days ago
+3
bwahaha Corbyn delivered the biggest Labour defeat in living memory.
3
doisch4 days ago
-8
Isn't this just uneducated british MAGA voting for this shit?
I see the same thing as trump, their policies are:
Stop Ukraine aide.
Deport immigrants.
Stop the refugee boats.
British people before immigrants.
Tax relief for the poor.
Etc.
Etc.
See what happened with Brexit? See whats happened to america?
Uk is going the same way, just with more surveillance.
-8
GoudaBenHur4 days ago
+10
lol more than 70 percent of the country disapprove of Starmer
10
art-love-social3 days ago
+4
"uneducated british MAGA.." loool - so the vast majority of the Reform gains were voters who were previously "educated" Labour and Conservative voters who have somehow become uneducated ? jayzuz
4
Richmondez3 days ago
The dissaffected voters (who are mostly from poorer and less educated background whether you like it the truth or not) who clamoured to populist c*** under Johnson but (shockingly) didn't get any benefits from it in their lives and had no one promising populist c*** in the last election just wanted the tories out and voted for Labour to do that.
Now they have new populist lies being told to them about how reform will fix everything by getting rid of immigrants and turn the UK into a utopic land of milk and honey just like Brexit was sold as previously. Being uneducated makes people more susceptible to believing simple emotive messages over complicated reasoned ones explaining why the former is bullshit and won't fix their lives and so continue to vote against their interests.
This doesn't mean reform voters are stupid, being smart isn't enough to not fall for scams and often smart uneducated and easier to scam as they over estimate their ability to spot one.
0
art-love-social3 days ago
+2
bwahahahaha - as above ... but they weren't uneducated/stupid/etc when they voted labour.
2
Richmondez3 days ago
+1
Oh they were, they just didn't have any populist nonsense to be strung along by last election so behaved as if labour was still the party or the working class. That and the turnout for Labour didn't actually go up, the Tory vote just collapsed and stayed at home. In all cases the power handed to a party doesn't reflect their support which us a broken aspect of the UK voting system.
1
art-love-social3 days ago
+1
I guess the fix to the broken UK voting system would be to only grant franchise to you and your intelligent, educated and scam savvy working class cohorts.
1
Richmondez3 days ago
+1
No, it would be proportional representation so only governments with a true plurality of the vote could be formed. Wouldn't stop a populist party gaining power or a "tyranny" of the intelligensia but it would limit how easy that could be achieved and how much power they would wield.
1
MouthfulOfWasps4 days ago
-9
My county is now reform (Essex) I feel sick. I don’t know what the answer is, but it can’t be this. Feels like an enormous step backwards, I can’t help but feel Labour need more time.
-9
The_Artist_Who_Mines4 days ago
-4
Its sickening the scum that people will vote for
-4
[deleted]4 days ago
-27
[removed]
-27
LordSigdis4 days ago
+16
The grooming gangs are a legit problem but the only person Elon can embarrass is himself.
16
[deleted]4 days ago
-6
[removed]
-6
The_Artist_Who_Mines4 days ago
-1
Is this satire
-1
Paddlesons4 days ago
-22
The same is coming for the United States unfortunately
150 Comments