I knew there was a reason Rishi Sunak is doing interviews and popped up in my feed. Can the UK very honestly not find better than that guy and Nigel Farage?
67
Anaptyso4 days ago
+61
It astounds me that about half the electorate support either the Tories or Reform, despite the immense amount of damage hard right populism has done to the country in the last decade or so.
61
shiny0metal0ass4 days ago
+18
This is how I felt when the Orange won over here.
Welcome to the shitshow
18
FrostyYoYos4 days ago
+12
Right? Everyone acts like their country won't elect the right ever again on Listnook. Time is a flat circle.
12
computer_d4 days ago
+3
New Zealand is about to do the same.
3
imaginary_num6er2 days ago
+1
I mean "right wing" back then is now just a moderate
1
YakkitySaxx4 days ago
+3
The masses have short attention spans and will believe anything if it benefits themselves more than their friends and neighbors
3
iWesleyy4 days ago
+1
I have higher confidence in the British populace than that. "Leaders" like this Farage guy and to an extent Sunak just come across as extremely opportunistic. They come out of the fray in times like this when people appear to be kind of in a daze. Whether it is just the perils of modern life or something more evidenced like how COVID has impacted our brains... it feels like everyone had a stroke.
1
Prior_Industry3 days ago
+6
I wish I had your confidence. There are a hell of a lot of low info voters out there that just see Farage as that matey bloke down the pub talking common sense. The UK voted Boris Johnson in so....
6
NoPhilosopher61113 days ago
+2
Sunak was never voted for and lost badly as soon as he was part of an election.
The conservatives got less seats than Labour no danger from them.
But the amount of people I speak to who genuinely think that reform will do better is actually scary.
2
squeak374 days ago
+3
Short memories and a shocking amount of people blindly believe whatever they read.
All that get told year round is that immigration is the problem and causing all of the price increases, nhs issues etc. They get told Labour will open the gates to way more immigration.
Meanwhile they don't get constantly reminded that it has been Tory policies that are demolishing the country's infrastructure.
The right are winning because of the media, simple as
3
Anaptyso4 days ago
+6
Brexit alone knocked about 6-8% off the country's GDP compared to if it had stayed in. The politicians who pushed for it should be a laughing stock, but the media never seem to question them on that.
6
Etherius3 days ago
You were literally warned both domestically and from foreign observers for YEARS that this was coming and would not abate unless immigration reforms were enacted
And not half-assed reforms either. You were told, in no uncertain terms, that a LARGE-AND-GROWING cohort of British citizens wanted immigration cut off and reversed
You can disagree with that attitude as a matter of policy or pragmatism… but you’ll just eventually be outvoted.
0
Verulla2 days ago
+1
How exactly do you "reverse" immigration?
1
Etherius1 day ago
+1
Ah
We call them “deportations”
1
RoCKSLAM2 days ago
+1
Implying that literally it's just one party or political side that does damage at this point is dumb. All of the parties are shit get used to it. They will all screw you since none of them care about you.
1
Aineisa4 days ago
-8
Tories are “hard right populism?” Lol
-8
Anaptyso4 days ago
+25
Yes. They moved significantly to the right following Johnson's purge of the moderates. Anyone who opposed Brexit - itself a prime example of hard right populism - was removed from leading roles in the party, with some truly awful people moving in to replace them.
People with social views like Jenrick or Anderson would have been seen as on the extreme wing of the party under a leader like Cameron or Major. Their constant stream of culture war populist policies like the Rwanda scheme are not normal by the standards of how politics was in the 90s and 00s.
The rise of Reform and the attention put on them has hidden a bit how far the Tories have been dragged to the right in an attempt to get those voters back.
25
dan_gleebals3 days ago
Cameron dragged the party well to the left which is what is killing it off. His politics were not traditional Conservative.
0
Anaptyso3 days ago
+13
His austerity policies were absolutely within mainstream conservative politics. His presentation was more appealing to the centre ground than that of his predecessors, but his general political positioning wasn't anything radical.
What really killed the Tory party off was Brexit, Johnson's purge, and Truss's disaster government. That pushed out a lot of their more experienced MPs in favour of a bunch of inexperienced populists, heavily damaged the economy, and normalised hard right politics to the extent that a party could emerge to flank them on the right.
13
aphroditex3 days ago
+3
Let’s not forget the Greens surged as well.
That’s an important detail the media deliberately leaves out.
3
MetalBawx2 days ago
+1
Yes but they picked up nowhere near as many seats as Reform did.
FPTP punishes split voting hard which is why when the majority of those lost labour voters split between the Greens and Lib Dems it resulted in Reform finishing first.
1
accousticguitar4 days ago
+16
Starmer reminds me of the Knight in Monty Python. Massive electoral losses are But a mere scratch.
16
International_Bee6534 days ago
+45
I can sense the slow motion train crash happening for the UK. Same feeling I got with Trump. If you have conditions where the electorate doesn't care then no miracle will happen - momentum will carry on and a radical shift will happen. I repeat if no one cares then no democracy-saving miracle will happen.
Something needs to change and sticking out heads in the sand won't change that.
45
Etherius3 days ago
+10
I think the electorate DOES care and that’s why Reform produced such a rout.
I think the electorate does not care for the leftist position\*, however.
10
lordnastrond4 days ago
+32
Our electoral system needs changing, FPTP means the votes of millions of people literally dont matter... its hard to not breed cynicism and disillusionment in such a system.
The UK NEEDS some form of proportional representation.
32
Anaptyso4 days ago
+8
It is crazy to have a voting system which only just about works with two parties when there are now five sitting on about the same level of support.
8
fartdarling4 days ago
+8
I'm 33. I used to be pretty hardline Labour. Now I'm not sure who I prefer between Labour and the Greens. Not once in my life have I ever voted for a party I support, because my area has always been a battleground between whichever right wing party is popular between tories, ukip and reform, vs the lib dems.
8
Sweettoastbama4 days ago
-13
>form of proportional representation.
Thats one way to add even more radicalism from right and left to stay in power.
-13
socialistpancake4 days ago
+6
Not really because it'll stop each end of the spectrum cananabising each other, e.g. this election cycle in my area it was between green and reform, so a lot of labour voters tactically voted green to keep out reform. But with PR there'd have been a mix of labour/green councilors.
And even if it did, that's democracy manifest and it's hard to argue why that's wrong
6
Sweettoastbama3 days ago
-5
Just to be transparent I'm not british but close and follow politics so all of this isn't different in most other advanced democracies.
if you're okay or want socialists like Green and other leftists to have more power then surely you're okay with right wing parties to push for theirs also? Also since the Greens are mostly for open borders immigration but then you're also for banning "hate speech" especially that's from the outside which seems ... inconsistent at the very least.
-5
socialistpancake3 days ago
+3
I'm not sure what the question is so apologies if I misunderstood, but yes I'm perfectly happy for more right wing politicians to get elected if that's what the public wants even though I personally vote left wing
3
Sweettoastbama3 days ago
-5
Well the first part was me checking if you really mean it when you say "democracy manifest" so that is consistent i guess. Though open borders is a good way to increase voter base without any checks and balances, it's almost like an infinite money glitch in video games
-5
Anaptyso4 days ago
+17
This Labour government feels similar to the Biden presidency: a brief and dull period of relative normality between an awful hard right government and one which is even worse.
17
Dinosawrrbeans4 days ago
-2
Are you calling the previous conservative government “hard right”
-2
art-love-social3 days ago
it seems so - ridiculous statement.
0
Dinosawrrbeans2 days ago
Now they downvote… I think these people are in for a rude awakening… Imagine thinking the previous government was “hard right” and this current government is “dull” or a “period of normality”
0
art-love-social2 days ago
+1
these people truly make me laugh
1
NotAnotherEmpire4 days ago
+13
Ironically thanks to the Tories, Labour doesn't have to face a general election for three more years.
13
Major_Pomegranate3 days ago
+4
UK, France, Germany, and i'm sure there are a few others, all currently looking to be a far-right sweep in the next elections.
May be a weird turn of events where Putin's war put a damper on eurosceptic far right movements for a few years. And then by the time they've bounced back and Europe is dominated by far right governments, Russia's war will have ended and their country facing severe economic and social strains from the effects of the military economy
4
Etherius3 days ago
+2
So lemme get this straight
So aside from Spain is there a single EI country that ISNT moving to the right?
I know the far right are in charge of both Italy and Greece
2
khamike3 days ago
+1
Hungary, just finally kicked out their right wing thug.
1
Etherius3 days ago
+1
That’s where you’re wrong
The current ruling party is Tisza, which is center-right populist and gets along quite well with Fidesz on issues like immigration.
1
khamike3 days ago
+4
I will agree that tisza isn't perfect but the question was "which country is moving rightwards" not "which country is a socialist paradise". Tisza is to the left of fidesz.
4
Etherius3 days ago
+1
I mean that’s a fair argument
I’d argue they’re just going to continue the work fidesz was doing
But I do resent the implied value judgement that one party is better just because it lies closer to the left
The left has a proven track record of producing horrifically destabilizing policies for domestic populations.
The better observation is that both sides think they’re doing right by their countries, and differ on the best path
Both sides need to acknowledge they have massive shortcomings and blind spots
1
Nick_Rousis2 days ago
+1
>I know the far right are in charge of both Italy and Greece
Greek here, this is absolutely not true. The prime minister is a center-right liberal/libertarian. And his party is a mainstream center-right force & member of the EPP that has lead multiple governments since it's founding in the '70s.
They are astoundingly corrupt and incompetent, but they definitely are not extremists, eurosceptic, or pro-russian. And this is coming from someone who despises them.
1
Etherius2 days ago
+1
Are they hardline anti-immigrant?
1
Nick_Rousis2 days ago
+1
Not really. They have taken measures for border security, but it's nothing compared to other eu countries and it isn't a prominent part of their agenda & rhetoric. Even some social-democratic parties like Denmark's and Sweden's I would say are more anti-migration.
1
Etherius2 days ago
+1
Shame.
1
Nuclear-Jester4 days ago
+41
Bru, Labour lost control of Walles for the first time in 100 years. Dude told a good chunk of Labour base to leave and they accepted his invitation
Like, I don't think it is a good sign for his government
41
Vectorman19893 days ago
+3
Do you want Labour to start playing musical chairs with PMs? Because part of the problem with the Tories was going to sleep and waking up with some new PM
3
VogonSoup4 days ago
+29
If Labour had a leader with a bit of charisma, who was more of a “Labour” person - eg not a lawyer with a knighthood, and ideally a bit northern, and they stopped bleating on about closer ties with the EU every other week, Reform wouldn’t stand a chance.
Maybe get the right Miliband brother this time, or Andy Burnham.
Tories are still a shambles and Farage is incredibly unpopular with the majority still.
The next election is Labour’s to lose, but they’ve proved they have that ability countless times.
29
MetalBawx4 days ago
+24
It amazes me how consistently they've shot themselves in the foot. Even better is how completely incompetent Labours current PR guys are. They can take an easy win like the reduction of immigration from the Tories unsustainable madness and barely communicate what they've done.
They can take even the worst scandals and make them worse without fail.
And yet they still have jobs...
If Starmer was half as smart as tries to appear he'd have known better to get involved with Mandelson and his clique. Instead he ended up in debt to shitheel and it blew up at the worst possible time.
Noone wants his new surveillance laws.
Noone wants to be lectured about protecting kids from a party that promoted a diddler to US ambassador.
Noone wants a government that goes after the poor and disabled.
Yet on and on these "leaders" march towards the cliff blaming anyone but themselves. That's the sorry state of the Labour party and about the only good thing anyone can say about them is that at least they're not the Tories...
24
Another-attempt424 days ago
+2
If Labour starts taking the immigration as a win, guess what?
They're going to get lambasted by their lefty-wing, who will say the more moderate Labourites are just Tories in red.
The current ecosystem is ludicrously, unfairly harsh on anyone who has more than two gears.
2
MetalBawx4 days ago
+10
Their left wing is gone anyway, it's too late, that ships already sunk.
Like it or not noone is winning a general election on a pro immigration stance. Reform wouldn't be more than a fringe party if their wasn't broad opposition for more of it.
10
Rogermcfarley4 days ago
+1
[ Removed by Listnook ]
1
Sonchay3 days ago
+1
What Labour have needed since roughly 1974 is a Director of Comms who is not a Labour member or supporter. They need to hire a mercenary socially conservative PR lead who can translate Labour's messages into a enticing format for the average UK voter - not the London or progressive bubble that is already on board.
1
JMthought3 days ago
+3
Totally agree. Doesn’t help that Starmer started his reign throwing all his campaign promises, to get Labour leader, in the bin. Yes there’s media attacks but there so few people in his corner.
3
Tomfonz4 days ago
+6
Theyll go for Rayner simply because they are self sabotaging b****.
6
The_Grand_Briddock4 days ago
+5
Hey now, don't forget about Wes Streeting.
The Jared Leto of British politics.
5
VogonSoup4 days ago
A Lammy/Rayner race to last place?
0
Timbershoe4 days ago
+2
Are labour supporters really that dead against a female PM?
For me Angela Rayner would be a perfect foil to the misogynistic weak chinned Farage. She’s very convincing, actually has character and would appeal to female voters. In terms of popularity she’s second only to Andy Burnham.
What’s the reason you’re so dismissive of what she brings to the table?
2
VogonSoup4 days ago
+4
Labour supporters on the whole quite like Rayner, I think. They also loved Jeremy Corbyn.
But for the wider electorate, she’s quite abrasive and unpopular to many, and has the whole personal finance c***-up history.
For me, it’s about electability. Very few are on par with Andy Burnham imo.
4
Prior_Industry3 days ago
+1
Funny of the finance issue is only a matter for a Labour candidate when you have Farage's level of grift going on.
1
VogonSoup3 days ago
+1
Ok, but she was deputy Prime Minister at the time.
1
Prior_Industry3 days ago
Yeah it's a problem but it's annoying that someone who wants to be a prime minster gets a pass on it. Either it matters or it doesn't and seemingly for a large part of the voting block corruption is a-okay.
0
Chopper34 days ago
+15
He's a staggering smart and capable person but as you say he has no charisma, but them you have to look at Borus, who had nothing but. At least Starmer and his buddies aren't openly on the rob. But you're right, I wish we had an actual socialist.
15
VogonSoup4 days ago
+11
They put huge effort into making Blair more public-friendly. In his early Parliamentary speeches he’s really posh.
But those were the Mandy Prince of Darkness days.
Labour just don’t seem inclined to put in the effort.
11
Chopper33 days ago
+3
It's a shame the press hated Miliband so much, he'd have been a good PM I think, but apparently his bacon-sarnie-eating-face was just too much for the public to stand ffs.
3
TheColourOfHeartache4 days ago
+9
A smart and capable person would not be making so many basic mistakes then u-turning on them. If nothing else they'd learn the limits.
9
Etherius3 days ago
+5
I think any party that doesn’t acknowledge that British people are tired of feeling like foreigners in their own hometowns is going to experience deeper and deeper losses.
The greens did “okay”, but “okay” isn’t going to stop that tide
Especially when the greens’ message is essentially “it’s a bad thing to keep foreigners out and if they misbehave while they’re here, it’s our own fault for being racist.”
5
Puzzle-Necked4 days ago
+2
The news made it look like Farage swept the election. Suspicious.
2
neversayalways4 days ago
-4
I am someone who voted Labour in every election and was a party member for most of my adult lift (now late thirties).
I quit soon after Kier became leader and, since then, my disaste for my old party has grown in to loathing and disgust.
Andy Burnham as leader is the only possible thing I can currently think of that could possibly tempt me back into being a Labour voter.
-4
VogonSoup4 days ago
+2
My last act as a Labour Party member was voting for Andy Burnham in the leadership election that installed Corbyn. What a weird time.
2
The_Artist_Who_Mines3 days ago
Ridiculous 'if only the leader was exactly who I think they should be the country would agree' waffle. Starmer is the archetype of working class background working his way up on merit. Also the population are in favour of greater EU ties.
0
noir_lord4 days ago
+20
On the whole - good.
We've replaced PM's way too rapidly over the last decade and this *was* a local election not a general election.
20
Nuclear-Jester4 days ago
Bru, Labour lost control of Walles for the first time in 100 years
Like, I don't think it is a good sign for his government
0
noir_lord4 days ago
+18
Indeed but say Labour replace Starmer because that's what the media has been howling for, do you think they'll be kinder to the next one or will we repeat this again and again.
He's been an effective PM, they've got through legislation that will have measurable benefits to all of us (and some I disagree with but that's reality, no party ever does entirely what any of us want) and I don't see the need to give the billionaire media owners any more power than they already *have*.
As for Plaid winning in Wales, I mean good? That's what democracy is supposed to do, reflect the views of their people and Welsh Labour haven't done themselves any favours in recent years.
18
Semajal4 days ago
+3
If Starmer steps down Farage will howl loudest (along with some of the media) for a general election.
3
Nuclear-Jester4 days ago
+4
Imo Starmer is in a similar position of Biden. Sure, he is pushing some reforms but they aren't enough to solve the UK's issues
Add he has moved right on some issues like trans rights AND publicaly shot down much needed wellfare reforms, and you can see why he is losing consensus
Either he swallow his pride and accept he can't replace the old Labour base with Reform voters, or he is going to become more and more unpopular each passing day
4
noir_lord4 days ago
+15
Trans Rights and OSA would very much come under "and some I disagree with".
The first was just a stupid fight to pick because any accommodation with what the right wing want is going to alienate the vocal left.
The OSA was even *stupider* a technically unworkable policy that was put through (with Labour support, lets be honest) under a Conservative government but the impact wouldn't be seen until under *this* government.
Classic "Something must be done, this is something, therefore it must be done".
But despite all that I come back to "If not Labour then who?" and for me as someone who is center-left (can't really reduce it to one axis) who represents that best for me, Greens? Unilaterial Nuclear Disarmament rules them out and their policies are even weirder, Tories? 14 years of austerity and the country on it's f****** knees or Reform? "I took 5m from a crypto billionaire" and we stood candidates who called white women the "master race" and somehow *worse*.
Seriously, What's my choice here, well meaning but somewhat inept, well meaning but seriously dangerous, not well meaning and already fucked the country or MAGA waving a Union flag.
15
lordnastrond4 days ago
Fully agree, he and Biden have so many similarities.
Among them allowing their personsl ambitions and stubborness to pave the way for the far right.
0
John-E-Whoops4 days ago
-3
Biden?
-3
lordnastrond4 days ago
-4
The people revile Starmer,
Thats not (just) media manipulation.
That is Starmer being genuinely bad at the job, and his strategy of courting the right while villifying the left (as the leader of what is supposed to be this country's left-wing party) has resulted in him hemorrhaging votes to reform and the greens.
These local elections prove people want Starmer gone, as you say democracy is supposed to reflect peoples views.
In that spirit then - Starmer must go because thats what the people clearly want.
Edit: Downvote me all you want, I'm just laying out facts - people f****** HATE Starmer.
-4
noir_lord4 days ago
+13
Can you list the ways that Starmer has been "genuinely bad at his job"?
For comparison lets compare him to say Boris Johnson (I'd have said Truss but lets compare to a PM that was in office for more than 6 weeks).
13
lordnastrond4 days ago
+5
Starmer is bad at messaging.
He has bad judgement in his appointees.
He promises change but keeps supporting old tory policies.
He promised to break the continuity of incompetence and scandal and instead he is repeating Mays u-turns (on policies he and Labour should never have supported in the first place) Johnsons corruption as well as Johnsons brazen dishonesty in the HOC (partygate v Mendelson)
His reactionary denying of all responsibility and instinct to throw people under the bus for his own errors is also very Johnsonian.
His political instincts sway towards the authoritarian, both in terms of his need to regulate and ban unnecessarily, his goverment overreach like the OSA, as well as his use of internal party mechanisms to force compliance from his own members or purge the party until its purely Starmer loyalists.
Worst of all he has no vision for the country and simply promises a continuation of the status quo - despite anyone with eyes veing able to see that the status quo is being firmly rejected throughout the country.
I honestly could go on.
5
neversayalways4 days ago
+5
I've seen the same comment from you twice, with the same misspelling of Wales.
Pretty sure you're a bot.
5
Richiematt2624 days ago
+2
Like Khan said "its not that we lost in certain areas, its we lost everywhere".
I'm a fan of Keir think he's done a good job, but politics these days seems people want more characters and not the old style tried and trusted stiff.
2
anotherbozo4 days ago
+1
People want growth and investment.
Labour is not delivering either.
Everything else is basically a side issue IMO.
1
SuddenGenreShift4 days ago
+9
It's not. Polls have immigration tied with the economy in perceived importance. Hence, you know, reform. Reform isn't surging because people think they're economic magicians.
9
lordnastrond4 days ago
+2
People dont want "characters".
They want an end to Thatcherite neo- liberal economics and the same status quo that has been slowly crushing them and our public infrastructure for decades.
Keir Starmer is not fundamentally different from Sunak, Truss, Johnson, May, Cameron or Blair.
The only "difference" is presentation and the degree of shared flaws.
2
Fats_Tetromino4 days ago
+1
Same thing with farage. He's the same shit as Johnson but more openly corrupt. However, like Johnson, he's a character.
1
gildedbluetrout4 days ago
-1
If Labour think its a good idea to implode and decapitate a sitting PM for **the third time in five years**… they’re insane.
-1
RobotsVsLions4 days ago
+6
If we stopped electing a bunch of useless selfinterested thatcherites we wouldn't need to keep replacing PM's.
6
noir_lord4 days ago
+4
Indeed, the sane response is to take the lesson from this that the changes they've made (while on the whole good) aren't *visible* enough or *bold* enough.
They command a huge majority, they have a once in a generation chance to *really* get things done, if they carry on as they are they are going to get creamed even if they do the big stuff they may still get creamed but at least they died on their feet and not their knees to trying to appease people who are unlikely to vote for them in the first place.
But it is the PLP and they really do like to get into internecine squabbles at silly times.
4
lordnastrond4 days ago
+1
If Labour want to save the country they need to get rid of FPTP and implement Proportional Representation.
1
noir_lord4 days ago
+3
That's been my view since I was a teenager and looked at voting systems.
A system where 33.7% of the vote gets you 63% of the MP's is not a representative one and I don't care who got the 33.7%, the make up of parliament should more closely represent the vote share for each party, FPTP is basically the opposite of that and with competing parties that is going to get *worse* not better.
3
Adams3b3 days ago
+2
Has its problems though- pretty much guarantees coalition governments so makes it harder to pass any legislation
2
noir_lord3 days ago
+1
If the legislation can't get a majority of the people elected to support it I'd still argue in a democracy that legislation shouldn't pass.
1
dineramallama4 days ago
+4
There’s probably a best strategic time to switch leaders in order to not peak too early before the next election. Now probably isn’t it.
4
lordnastrond4 days ago
+3
The problem is that Starmer clinging on is hurting the Labour brand as a whole, and if he clings too long that damage will be nearly irreversible.
3
Etherius3 days ago
+4
Labour is just fucked
If Starmer moves right he loses more to the Greens
If he hangs on as is, his whole party loses credibility
If he steps down, EVERYONE will howl for an election
He and Merz would probably the best of friends right now
4
lordnastrond3 days ago
+3
Labour is fucked for sure.
IMO they need to implement some form of Proportional Representation to save the country and our broken politics.
3
Etherius3 days ago
+3
How do you suppose that would go over?
Because “saving the country”, right now, looks like aggressive immigration reform to the vast majority of voters
Electoral reform will look more like Labour trying to save its own skin rather than the country
They’re zero chance this would be read as anything other than “changing the rules of the game when you’re losing”. There’s no clean way to reframe that either. Not at this point. Not after Labour got absolutely dumpstered
3
MoleWhackSupreme4 days ago
+7
I think he will be gone within a few months at most
7
Etherius3 days ago
+3
Won’t matter
Unless his successor takes the wind out of Reform’s sails with hardline immigration policies, neither Labour nor The Tories are going to stop Reform.
3
MetalBawx2 days ago
+1
Labour got it down under 300k already and almost nobody knows because the news barely mentions it and Labour are apparently above just paying for billboards with this years figures on them.
The last year under Tories was 920k in comparison.
1
Etherius2 days ago
+1
As an American, slowing the “invasion” doesn’t seem like it’s going to cut it for the British electorate.
Not at all
1
13ThirteenX3 days ago
+2
Difference is, if UK pulls this same shitshow that trumps doing, I fear the UK is going straight in the rubbish bin. I doubt the US is going to recover from this, difference so they hold the world reserve and the biggest army. What's the UK got? And clearly the people of the UK want to go it alone and join Russia and Trump into a pariah state.
2
lordnastrond4 days ago
+7
Starmer is done and stubbornly clinging to his post is only damaging his party and in the long term, the country.
Just like Biden, his stubborn insistence on placing his own political ambition above the common good is paving the way for the far right.
History will not be kind to him for this.
7
LordSigdis4 days ago
+2
What would you say the common good is and how is Steamer not following that? He seems to have reduced immigration from the Conservative era.
2
lordnastrond4 days ago
+1
The common good is preventing the rise of fascism.
Instead Starmer is introducing more and more authoritarian measures juuuuuust in time for a Reform government to take the precedent hes set and keep running with it.
He also point blank refuses to get rid of FPTP despite it being the will of Labour members, most of the country AND it being the best way to prevent tge far right from gaining a disproportionate amount of seats in the next General Election.
Edit: Love that I'm being downvoted for saying we should try to prevent fascism.
1
LordSigdis4 days ago
+3
That is true. I forgot about his obsession with banning and regulating everything.
3
RobotsVsLions4 days ago
-8
The fact that your measure for common good is "doing what the far right wants" illustrates the problem with you and Starmer and the entire neoliberal order so incredibly well.
-8
LordSigdis4 days ago
+11
Dude, do you think it is only the far right in Britain who wants reduced immigration?
11
Piidge4 days ago
+4
Welcome to the hyper polarised world buddy. People think like a light switch now. You're either 100% pro, or 100% against.
4
RobotsVsLions4 days ago
-8
The far right and those susceptible to their arguments.
You can't hold far right positions without being part of the far right, that's just how it works.
There are no rational arguments against immigration that hold up, it's entirely racist scapegoating.
-8
LordSigdis4 days ago
+2
> You can't hold far right positions without being part of the far right, that's just how it works.
Hahahahaha! Reduced immigration is not a far right position in Britain, it's a center, center-right and right position, even being held by a minority of the center-left nowadays. And even if it was your logic is fallacious.
The only place where reducing immigration may even possibly start to be considered a primarily far right position is America because it's a land of immigrants in the first place. I'm guessing you are from America. Well buddy our politics don't apply to the rest of the world and it embarrasses me to see fellow Americans, both left and right, trying to fit all of the world into the American lens.
This is why the Greens will not see electoral success, well this and the fact that they seem to have a genuine antisemitism problem - and this is coming from somebody who doesn't even support Israel.
2
ImaginedRealBillions4 days ago
-10
Lmao Biden was not politically ambitious he literally stepped aside the minute people started catching him fall asleep on camera. Can't say the same about 47
-10
Scedasticity14 days ago
+10
The fact that he didn't step aside until after the debate is proof that he *was* politically ambitious. He would've been having days like that for months, if not years, before that.
10
lordnastrond4 days ago
+6
Biden only allowed himself to be replaced as candidate with a few months to spare until the vote, and he only did that when his cognitive decline was so glaringly obvious they couldnt feasibly gaslight the country into accepting it anymore.
Make no mistake, Biden was pushed and he seriously hurt the democrats chances by dragging things out to that point.
6
RobotsVsLions4 days ago
+1
"He stepped aside as soon as he'd already received the nomination and it was far too late to get behind anyone but his even less popular hand picked successor, and only did so because he was caught on camera multiple times falling asleep on the job and forgetting what he was saying in the middle of a sentence, he's so selfless" is an absolutely wild take.
1
AloneChapter4 days ago
+2
Really ? All politicians need to do is for once just once. Concentrate on the little people who do the heavy lifting. Infrastructure, education, health not corporate, tax cuts for those above average.
As with most governments around the world it is only their donors that have their concerns met.
2
slimeyy_023 days ago
+1
I feel sad for him, tho i am not aware of british politics, he seemed like a genuine guy
1
Ok-Leadership25693 days ago
+1
Good on him.
1
smith94473 days ago
+1
Reminds me a bit of the first Thatcher term. Low public approval, big losses at local elections. Then went on to win two more terms. If he can ride this out and economy starts to improve he may be in power a long time.
1
SassySirennn2 days ago
+1
Well, that’s tater talk right there. Probably would listen to the people
1
DoctorNo16612 days ago
+1
Is the UK always this instable? It feels like they change prime ministers every three months.
1
Typingdude34 days ago
-1
The left keeps eating itself while the right marches lockstep in unison. And before you say Starmer isn’t left, get a grip. Labour is the only thing standing in the way of Conservatives and Reform gaining power.
-1
neversayalways4 days ago
+11
"The right marches lockstep in unison" is probably the dumbest thing I'll hear this year.
Reform have emptied the Conservative backbenches and Tory ex-minister rejects, and have stolen nearly their whole voter base. Then Reform itself has split to create Restore and Advance parties.
11
Nuclear-Jester4 days ago
+7
He is a pretty shit barrier then
7
lordnastrond4 days ago
+4
Starmer isnt left - thats WHY he is failing to keep Reform from gaining power.
The Greens successes, especially in the Gorton by-election, prove this.
In many ways his vision for the Labour party and the country itself is not that different from the Tories, hence why the nation is so thouroughly punishing both of these parties.
4
RobotsVsLions4 days ago
+3
Starmer and his allies: We have to wage war with the left and destroy them, chase them out of our party.
The left: *votes for other parties*
Morons: Why are you attacking him, he's the left!
3
LordSigdis4 days ago
+2
I've got to be honest with you, Farage and Reform don't seem interested in "conserving" anything, they're just semi fascists. Conservatism can be a very valuable thing in an old country like Britain with a storied past but these people don't give a shit about the conserving part of it, just about their bigotry
TLDR Reform has neither the good parts of the left nor the good parts of the right so they can get fucked. Similiar to the modern GOP. Trump does not want to f****** conserve anything.
2
MarioMuzza4 days ago
-3
Conservatives anywhere never cared about conserving, or else they'd be environmentalists. Conservatives are just anti-working class social regressionists.
-3
LordSigdis4 days ago
+3
I know conservatives who are environmentalists, actually.
3
MarioMuzza4 days ago
Sure, but that's like me saying "I know leftists who don't mind billionaires". You can find all sorts of people anywhere. But anti-environmentalism and climate change denial are way more common among conservative voters, and conservative politicians consistently take up anti-environmentalist policies.
I can show you data, if you'd like. And you can check the policy history of any conservative party in the western world.
0
LordSigdis4 days ago
+1
I know, and it is one of the greatest reasons I consider myself a liberal and not a conservative, alongside many others, the others mostly being that conservatives want to enforce religion and their family structure and their ideas of sexual orientation onto everyone else. I personally am not even religious and don't ascribe to the 'teachings of Jesus' or the family unit in my personal life.
However just saying there are conservatives who are quite aware of climate change and I think that is at least a coherent ideology. An example of this is probably King Charles III or Popes Leo or Francis. Socially conservative people who are also interested in conserving the planet and do not like Trump.
1
captain_decaption4 days ago
+1
You think that roughly half of people can be described this way? Perhaps this is hubris?
1
MarioMuzza4 days ago
+1
I was responding to OP, who was talking about politicians, not voters.
Most people don't really have an ideology. All the conservative voters I know are mostly concerned with woke stuff and immigrants.
1
captain_decaption4 days ago
+1
And you consider immigration policy to be anti-working class? Do you have a working definition of working class? Without presupposing any moral judgment on unions, do you consider hiring scabs to be union busting behavior? Do you think unions are something that working class people should care about? Do you think that perhaps the people who are talking about a return to the past, socially, might actually be talking about 1995 instead of 1955?
1
MarioMuzza4 days ago
? I didn't say immigration policy is anti-working class. Where are you making these connections? I said conservative VOTERS are concerned with immigration, and conservative POLITICIANS are anti-working class.
I'm a raging leftist, I will never vote for a right-wing party, and I'm personally pro-controlled immigration. I consider that a pro-working class policy.
Big corporations shouldn't decide a country's immigration policy for the sake of c**** labour that creates unfair competition and reduces leverage for that country's existing working class.
I still don't vote right-wing because I disagree on pretty much all other levels. For instance, even though I find some liberal social justice talk exhausting, that doesn't affect my vote because you can't legislate people into not saying annoying shit.
Still, socially regressing to 1995 wouldn't be ideal. My gay friends at least wouldn't think so. I'm in my mid thirties and I remember you'd get beat up for being gay at my school. Kids nowadays are way more accepting.
0
captain_decaption4 days ago
+1
Well, despite claiming to be a raging leftist, you haven't really failed to distinguish yourself from a conservative voter in any way. The only two criteria you gave for conservative voters, you seem to basically agree with...
1
Etherius3 days ago
+1
Have you ever considered that maybe there’s nothing the left can realistically do to address issues the way the public wants?
Labour has a pragmatic take: “We need some immigration to fill out the jobs market”
The greens have an honest and progressive platform where they think everyone should be welcome
And the people who are allowed to vote generally say one thing, loudly: “we are tired of feeling like tourists in our own home country”.
Neither Labour nor Greens CAN address this. They just can’t.
I may be an outside observer but it’s preeeeetty clear that immigration is an incredibly polarizing topic in UK politics, and it’s even clearer which way the winds are blowing.
Especially now
1
HelloYesItsMeYourMom4 days ago
It doesn’t matter how popular the rest of their policies are, their immigration policy isn’t. As long as they don’t take a hardline approach to immigration they will lose. Literally look at the last ten years of US politics. This is coming to you fast.
0
MetalBawx2 days ago
+1
Under 300k this year down from 920k on the conservatives last year.
1
TheWellington894 days ago
-1
Of course. Hes not done ignoring war crimes yet. Someone else might do something about it and we cant have that
147 Comments