· 199 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 6, 2026 at 3:01 PM

Steve Bannon wins Supreme Court order likely to lead to dismissal of contempt of Congress conviction

Posted by AudibleNod

Steve Bannon wins Supreme Court order likely to lead to dismissal of contempt of Congress conviction
AP News
Steve Bannon wins Supreme Court order likely to lead to dismissal of contempt of Congress conviction
Longtime Trump ally Steve Bannon has won a Supreme Court order that’s expected to lead to the dismissal of his criminal conviction for refusing to testify to Congress.
🚩 Report this post

199 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
R-Dragon_Thunderzord 4 days ago +4834
An unsigned order. Cowards.
4834
JohnTomorrow 4 days ago +655
What does that mean, exactly.
655
Aggressive-Mix4971 4 days ago +3036
It means the justices issued it without making it public which justice voted which way, and also didn’t write out a justification for their ruling. No hearings before the Court, either, they’re issuing a ruling without hearing any arguments. They’re only supposed to do shadow docket rulings like that on cases that are a pressing matter that warrant a rapid response, but the Roberts court abuses the hell out of the privilege.
3036
PiRhoNaut 4 days ago +822
I can smell a 6/3 decision when I see one.
822
Hilldawg4president 4 days ago +262
It only takes 4 to agree to hear a case, so this has to be 6/3
262
techleopard 4 days ago +296
Sounds like something that needs to be legislated away. Like kids, when you abuse privileges, you should lose them.
296
Karenomegas 4 days ago +148
I suspect Justice Butt Chugger Supreme there has never lost a single privilege. The hearings for him were appalling. I literally have a hard time separating him from Matt Damon playing him on SNL
148
Bovronius 4 days ago +72
I can't imagine having worked on SNL since 2016... slowly watching reality become too insane to even create satrical takes on. Melissa McCarthy's Sean Spicer was barely an exaggeration on his character, now James Austin's Trump character is too coherant to be taken as the real thing, and Kegsbreath is douchier than Colin could ever pretend to be.
72
warp99 4 days ago +10
Yes this age will be called the “Death of Satire”
10
ApprehensiveGoat2734 4 days ago +6
Rogue institution. I see no reason why we should listen to them anymore. 
6
readygetsetnvm 4 days ago +7
Pack. The. F******. Court.
7
Infamous-Salad-2223 4 days ago +81
Lazy work like this should be criminal at this level.
81
inquisitive_guy_0_1 4 days ago +100
It's not lazy. It's deliberate, malicious, and subversive of the law. But, what do you expect from a wholly compromised $upreme court openly taking bribes for their decisions?
100
OutlyingPlasma 4 days ago +65
It's time for Congress to defund the supreme Court. They can work for free on the sidewalk with no staff if they are going to make Shadow docket rulings like this.
65
DStanizzi 4 days ago +44
They aren’t making money from their government salaries. They are getting bribes and that’s the problem
44
donkeyrocket 4 days ago +13
Republicans in Congress aren't doing their own f****** jobs. They have no room to start telling other branches how to do theirs. Citizens, assuming free and fair elections, need to vote all these folks out and vote in candidates willing to overhaul the system.
13
JohnBrownOH 4 days ago +70
It means that laws are only loose guidelines and when the rich abuse them like this, it renders them moot. Then it's up to the citizens to enforce justice and balance.
70
ZachMN 4 days ago +20
It means that there is no Constitutional protection against a political party obtaining power over all three branches of government and then using that power to ignore and/or destroy said Constitution.
20
sargonas 4 days ago +19
It means no justices signed the order, so no one knows who voted which what or their full personal opinions on the matter. It also means this rule cannot be used in other cases as a form of precedent, and is a one time ruling for this one issue
19
FinaLLancer 4 days ago +69
Does this make any difference?
69
Correct_Inspection25 4 days ago +90
I believe it means this judgement cannot be used for establishing precedence by the lower courts.
90
AudibleNod 4 days ago +49
Which strengthens the Supreme Court's own position because lower courts will inevitably have guess. This gives appeals a greater chance to move forward. Which in turn drives more and more cases to be decided by SCOTUS. Which leaves them a greater opportunity to write and rewrite case law as they please.
49
CrashB111 4 days ago +44
It just means they are too big of cowards to make it a public decision with who voted for what. Because they know it's wrong and bullshit, so they don't want to attach their names to it.
44
dragonmp93 4 days ago +7
Well, most of the things that this administration has done are illegal anyways. But they are trying to sweep this under the rug.
7
ancientweasel 4 days ago +61
You misspelled traitors.
61
ymmotvomit 4 days ago +20
Gotta love separation of powers.
20
techman2692 4 days ago +16
Gotta love nepotism and party loyalty is more like it.
16
Lostlilegg 4 days ago +6287
The SC just said that Congress can’t hold people in contempt for failing to abide by a Congressional subpoena. What power does Congress have these days?
6287
juanmlm 4 days ago +2124
The power to acquiesce.
2124
Bart_Yellowbeard 4 days ago +480
Which these toothless bitches wield with impunity.
480
SPzero65 4 days ago +215
Oh don't you worry, the "rule of law" will reappear just in time for the next Democrat president.
215
RecentDecision2329 4 days ago +85
Praise Allah
85
yobwerd 4 days ago +105
Funny, “the next Democratic president.” Beyond the catastrophic failures happening in Iran, regardless of the US army generals own disapproval, the changing of brass isn’t coincidental. People with integrity are being replaced. Loyalists are being installed. A military coup will be in the cards, if the midterms don’t result in a red victory. And to be honest, beyond the SAVE Act, I don’t trust that the elections will be fair to begin with. Oh how far this country has fallen.
105
warlordcs 4 days ago +105
I think he was implying that suddenly laws will be laws again just to hinder the next Dem. Right now they just seem to be suggestions
105
Aware-Virus-4718 4 days ago +63
Yeah, but we can’t understate how serious this is. This isn’t “Republicans being Republicans”. It’s a coup. Stripping power from every other political party is a coup. It’s not a laughing matter.
63
EdinMiami 4 days ago +3
Republicans: We hear you. But what if...there were only one political party? One Party, No Coup 2026!!
3
Finn-reddit 4 days ago +14
I second this. As someone who reads history books, which Americans seemingly do not. Specifically about the Nazi rise to power. But really, we can literally see this in recent times in other countries. Xi Jinping did this towards the end of his presidency. Now he is basically president for life. Consolidate power, oust those who are not loyal. It's simple really. Who will oppose you when the military is on your side and most of the government is on your payroll?
14
bagofpork 4 days ago +48
Borderline Shakespearean.
48
releaseepsteinfiles1 4 days ago +45
The power of insider trading
45
Aposoky 4 days ago +818
Setting the stage for nothing to happen to Bondi when she doesn't comply.
818
woodst0ck15 4 days ago +362
Exactly. They couldn’t outright give Trump every thing but they’ll make sure none of his cronies and ass kissers see the inside of a jail cell.
362
lowteq 4 days ago +79
Which is crazy because he could just issue a blanket pardon for her like he did with the J6 apes.
79
private_developer 4 days ago +106
I think they are operating under the very obvious knowledge that Trump can't be trusted. Even to pardon their own. He's a vindictive c***, and the slight only has to be imagined to earn his ire. They want avenues to protect their operatives without having to rely on Trump's mood.
106
lunar_adjacent 4 days ago +18
And themselves when that day comes
18
biscuitarse 4 days ago +30
Makes you wonder exactly how many kiddie diddlers sit on the SC
30
SuperSpecialAwesome- 4 days ago +7
Boofer and Thomas, for sure. But all 9 are traitors anyhow, for overruling Trump's disqualification.
7
StarsapBill 4 days ago +381
You misread it, democrats in Congress can’t hold people in contempt. Republicans can absolutely throw your ass in prison for refusing. We live in a fascists regime.
381
Sweatytubesock 4 days ago +117
The power to take it up the ass from a notorious pedophile.
117
_Random_Username_ 4 days ago +22
The only logical explanation is that they're all implicated and we should treat them as such
22
Vandergrif 4 days ago +7
It *would* explain a few things.
7
ChiralWolf 4 days ago +206
That is not what's being said here to be clear. Trump's DOJ is refusing to continue the prosecution against Bannon and is pushing for the charges to be dismissed. If the DOJ corruptly refuses to prosecute someone there isn't much that SCOTUS can do. This isn't saying that Congress can't hold people in contempt, it's saying that a corrupt DOJ can refuse to prosecute pretty much anything it doesn't want to.
206
LiquidAether 4 days ago +80
Which is so much worse, honestly.
80
HoozleDoozle 4 days ago +57
Not really. The DOJ always had the discretion to drop cases. Congress still holds inherent contempt power and can bypass the DOJ and the courts whenever it wants.
57
ChiralWolf 4 days ago +43
Yup, they just need to assign a special prosecutor for it. This certainly isn't good but I also don't think it's reaching the doom and gloom people are making of it, it's just regular bad (which is still not ok!)
43
HoozleDoozle 4 days ago +20
Yeah it's bad as a matter of policy but correct as a matter of law. This was 100% the correct decision by SCOTUS. Congress just needs to nut up next time.
20
AntiKamniaChemicalCo 4 days ago +22
Ok but this actually still means congress has no power to impose contempt charges if the white house is willing to corrupt the DOJ. Apparently there is no longer any such thing as actual independent special prosecutors.
22
TheCrazedTank 4 days ago +8
They’ve been eroding Congress’s powers even before the second term, it’s part of their plan to make the President and their EOs the sole authority of the land. Ya know, like a Monarch…
8
cobaltgnawl 4 days ago +53
Oh just in time for pam bondi to not abide by it
53
jkvincent 4 days ago +19
They're good at insider trading and nothing else.
19
raouldukeesq 4 days ago +6
That's not what the ruling means. 
6
Cohens4thClient 4 days ago +4
No power at all. It must be insane blackmail, because nobody in Congress is speaking up about totally losing their power over the purse strings or the ability to start or stop wars... and the supreme court isn't making a good show of THEIR power over anyone
4
Dull_Job_6372 4 days ago +8
How do these maga dumb f*** congressman see that trump does not need them at all.
8
john_san 4 days ago +7
Cool so the Clintons don’t have to waste time if they are subpoenaed ?
7
The_bruce42 4 days ago +19
No. They're democrats so they have to follow the rules.
19
elmatador12 4 days ago +4
What the difference between failing to abide a congressional subpoena and failing to comply to other subpoenas? Can everyone just stop complying with subpoenas now?
4
Poison_the_Phil 4 days ago +3
The power to bend over
3
drewts86 4 days ago +9
Congress has gone full UN mode - the most power they can exercises is a sternly worded letter.
9
ax255 4 days ago +3
I mean as little as possible. Between the neutering by SCOTus and the current Congress' ability to passively watch the erosion of checks and balances; the power of Congress has been strategically removed
3
emogu84 4 days ago +3
SC: Issues like abortion should be decided by congress Also SC: \*removes power from Congress\*
3
AudibleNod 4 days ago +1787
>The move frees a trial judge to act on the Republican administration’s pending request to dismiss Bannon’s conviction and indictment “in the interests of justice.” So, she whole three coequal branches stuff was just bullshit this whole time?
1787
Kaffe-Mumriken 4 days ago +469
Surprised to learn all three branches were just a partisan shit flinging contest
469
meatball402 4 days ago +101
Always has been. They just don't tell us. I read an article from the 19th century about the justices and the exact same words would apply to these fucks.
101
SSGASSHAT 4 days ago +5
It's remarkable when you look at the history of this country and you see the same fuckin' arguments over and over. Only the dates, names, and small details change. But the arguments remain the same. And I don't know about you, but I was under the impression that if there's a problem, 3 centuries later, it should be solved.
5
YourFreeCorrection 4 days ago +14
They weren't, but they have certainly devolved into that.
14
DoctorG0nzo 4 days ago +234
Man, imagine throwing out checks and balances for the guy that looks like a sentient jaundiced liver and talks like an anime villain.
234
_head_ 4 days ago +48
"sentient" is debatable 
48
Cohens4thClient 4 days ago +33
The only possibility that seems reasonable is that the blackmail is amazingly insane on everyone.  Congress just giving up control of the money is the most insane part of it to me. They know this guy wont be around forever.
33
CallMeAlZutt 4 days ago +8
You know they've got tons on old Clarence and his fat banshee wife
8
Ryengu 4 days ago +7
>talks like an anime villain.  Maybe one from the abridged series.
7
YamahaRyoko 4 days ago +38
System only works when people act in good faith.
38
C1izard 4 days ago +72
Welcome to the goal of the heritage foundation
72
Zardotab 4 days ago +37
to turn America into an evangelical trailer park.
37
C1izard 4 days ago +28
More specifically to turn America into an absolute monarchy with their heretical form of christianity as the mandate - which is why they get along so well with the right wing oligarchs Theil Techbros who want to turn cities into their personal fiefdoms.
28
Evident_Disaster 4 days ago +11
I sincerely wish the Pope just declared the Evangelicals as heretics. Genuinely Muslims have more in common with actual Christians, than what you got with Evangelicals and those adjacent to anything close to Catholics, it's like looking at aliens from another world. Prosperity gospel bs and asking for ever amounts of money, self serving pastors and nothing to do with doing good things.
11
C1izard 4 days ago +3
Well the modern American evangelical movement. Some the past evangelical movements were genuinely good (like the evangelicals who were the main drivers for emancipation, and many others are problematic in hindsight but also did good things and had good intentions). The modern American evangelical movement are just Neo-Pharases who push for every thing Jesus opposed, and at worst are full on doomsday cultists
3
aaronhayes26 4 days ago +46
It’s worth mentioning that the branches were ***not*** intended to be coequal. Article 1 establishes the Congress - not the executive. The founders would be horrified with how much power has accumulated in the White House.
46
Shoot_from_the_Quip 4 days ago +16
Exactly. Congress is literally the top of the government. Everything else was added later. That they have willingly given up essentially all power like this is horrifying.
16
WaffleBlues 4 days ago +92
It's not that simple. Congress could assert much more power, but has \*chosen\* not to. This is the key insight - that it chose to give up its own powers. The founders seemed to envision a congress that was "jealous of" and would "protect" its own powers. What the founders didn't seem to envision was a congressional majority that was \*far\* more concerned with showing loyalty to the president in order to be reelected, than to protect its own powers. Johnson isn't the first to do this, but it's so extreme under Johnson. Congress isn't concerned with protecting its own powers, it is concerned with showing loyalty to Trump in order to get endorsements and superpac money.
92
ILoveLamp9 4 days ago +15
This exactly. The decision isn’t saying Congress doesn’t have power. It’s just saying the SC can’t rule on the dismissal chosen by this DOJ. So much of what is going on now that flies in the face of our democracy is happening because Republicans in Congress are remaining silent to show loyalty to their king.
15
12PoundCankles 4 days ago +21
We need to stop holding ourselves back with laws that our enemies ignore in order to harm us.
21
HurinGaldorson 4 days ago +11
Depends on whether a Democrat or a Republican is president. Calvinball 101.
11
HazyDavey68 4 days ago +778
Coincidently, Bannon is ALL OVER the Epstein files and was an Epstein confidante. Do with that information what you will.
778
elementzn30 4 days ago +229
He literally was trying to work with Epstein to rehabilitate his image. After he was convicted.
229
tandem_kayak 4 days ago +47
We will do absolutely nothing with it, as usual.
47
Cohens4thClient 4 days ago +13
Its almost like billionaires own the politicians and then they dont care about our strongly worded letters
13
Gold_Repair_3557 4 days ago +121
It’s no surprise. Our president is a felon who has seen zero jail time. Only us regular folks are expected to follow the law. That is the real America.
121
SPzero65 4 days ago +11
I'm honestly surprised they haven't turned on him yet. He's peeled back the mask that they have hidden under all these years/decades and revealing it to the public in real time. Eventually, this could seriously threaten the cushy life/benefits they have come to enjoy, if at the very least make it harder to obtain. I'm surprised they haven't just impeached him and thrown him under the bus as a collective, put him away if for nothing else than to satisfy the people so they can go on stealing from them in quiet again.
11
roflmaohaxorz 4 days ago +14
They’re starting to realize they don’t have to hide anything, we won’t do anything about it anyways
14
JerryDipotosBurner 4 days ago +569
I love how they can clearly and corruptly dismiss charges and just say “in the interest of justice”. These people should have to plainly say why they are dismissing charges against their political allies so everyone understands it’s just because they support the President.
569
lowteq 4 days ago +112
For them, it isn't about *justice*. It's about *Just Us*.
112
SuperSpecialAwesome- 4 days ago +6
> I love how they can clearly and corruptly dismiss charges and just say “in the interest of justice”. Same way that all 9 traitors on the Supreme Court overruled Colorado's enforcement of Trump's disqualification, knowing that Schumer, Jeffries, and Biden Chamberlain would submit to Trump.
6
MotMan72 4 days ago +297
How the f*** can the Supreme Court overrule an explicit power of the Legislative branch? How does that not break the separation of powers?
297
sarhoshamiral 4 days ago +157
Congress can impeach the judges if they wanted.
157
Icy_Policy_8509 4 days ago +6
And I bet it only takes a few more than we have
6
HoozleDoozle 4 days ago +42
Because that's not what's happening here. Congress by statute farmed out contempt to the DOJ for convenience. The DOJ ALWAYS had the discretion to drop cases. If Bannon was held in ***inherent contempt*** the SCOTUS can't do anything about it. (See: Jurney v. MacCracken)
42
Iohet 4 days ago +18
Except Bannon was convicted and served his sentence. This is an end run around the system
18
HoozleDoozle 4 days ago +12
What does that have to do with anything? If you appeal a criminal conviction and the govt declines to defend, you win. That’s how it always works.
12
Neatcursive 4 days ago +6
people aren't understanding well what is happening here. Trump's DOJ is doing this, SCOTUS is not stopping it (and, honestly, I wouldn't expect them to). I think you highlighted the disconnect - Congress doesn't prosecute the contempt.
6
BigJellyfish1906 4 days ago +14
Because that’s not what’s happening *at all*. There saying “if the DOJ wants to drop a case, the judiciary can’t stop them.” The issue here is the DOJ, not the power of the judge. 
14
PatchyWhiskers 4 days ago +1022
I could not possibly have more contempt for the justices of the Supreme Court. Pack it like the House of Lords in the UK, it's useless as a functional institution.
1022
jimtow28 4 days ago +347
The consequences of that f***** being able to add 3 justices to the court will be felt for decades.
347
the_rev_28 4 days ago +150
Wait until Alito retires this fall
150
antofthesky 4 days ago +97
Justice Cannon incoming.
97
ThingsRecreated 4 days ago +23
Don’t call her “Justice”, she doesn’t deserve the title
23
rwbeckman 4 days ago +26
Obstructice Cannon
26
gangy86 4 days ago +5
Cannon of Injustice
5
underpants-gnome 4 days ago +47
Paging Aileen Cannon to the Supreme Court, you're needed to completely dismantle any remaining belief in the concepts of law or justice left in the country.
47
illusionzmichael 4 days ago +26
Thomas will too before Trump leaves office. He's 77, if a Democratic president takes over in 2029 he'll be 80 and might not outlast the 4-8 years of that president's administration.
26
I_Am_No_One_123 4 days ago +15
Thomas is on record stating he will never retire as his term is dedicated to payback against the mean liberals who voted against his nomination.
15
kwangqengelele 4 days ago +7
Yeah, he'll retire knowing his action will add another couple of generations onto that revenge tour.
7
jpgr1965 4 days ago +17
Likely generations, not just decades
17
tdmatchasin 4 days ago +34
RBG will go down in history as one of the worst of all time simply because she wouldn't retire when asked to by Obama
34
etr4807 4 days ago +12
Completely tanked whatever her legacy should have been by being directly responsible for turning a close 5-4 court into a 6-3 majority.
12
Parking_Zucchini_938 4 days ago +10
Agreed, classic idiotic dem party thinking that seemed to exist between 2014 and 2024. Jill insisting Joe was still at the top of his game being the latest horrendous error that enabled autocrats to take power.
10
[deleted] 4 days ago +58
[deleted]
58
UnpricedToaster 4 days ago +128
Gut the power of Congress before it changes hands from red to blue in 2027
128
Fallen_Jalter 4 days ago +23
surprised they're firing themselves because that's exactly whats going to happen when they have no more power.
23
BadSkeelz 4 days ago +182
Once again the Roberts court finding that "Accountability is Unconstitutional"
182
Deranged_Kitsune 4 days ago +116
"Accountability **for Republicans** is Unconstitutional". Democrats, not so much.
116
thetinsnail 4 days ago +49
After the case is dismissed he will probably sue for millions in compensation and get it. What a stupid system.
49
tandem_kayak 4 days ago +6
Same as Flynn, and Trump...
6
versus_gravity 4 days ago +86
So the DoJ will be cutting him a check for a million dollars soon?
86
Alwayssunnyinarizona 4 days ago +13
Sweet gig if you can get it.
13
Th1rte3n1334 4 days ago +7
That would be my guess. “Keep your friends rich and” well the quote seems to end there.
7
notyourbutthead 4 days ago +28
Laying the groundwork for newly fired Pam Bondi to ignore any and all congressional subpoenas. F*** this Supreme Court.
28
Conscious_Problem924 4 days ago +91
This country needs some chippity chop 1789 style. Like for the last 30 years, at least
91
SPzero65 4 days ago +35
Sorry, can't help you. 2A is only for massacring school children and people who ring your doorbell apparently.
35
ImCreeptastic 4 days ago +8
And taking a run through the wrong neighborhood 
8
SPzero65 4 days ago +6
And people who turn around in your driveway.
6
annaleigh13 4 days ago +17
This is what happens when your constitution is based on good faith, and the electorate votes in people who act in their own interests
17
bassocontinubow 4 days ago +17
Which I guess also means that Kristi Noem won’t have to show up to testify. This is unreal.
17
Negative_Gravitas 4 days ago +16
This is bad. Even for this bunch of corrupt oathbreakers.
16
Competitive-Ad-9404 4 days ago +14
So only liberals will be facing Congressional investigations going forward and conservatives will never face anything. 
14
EmperorsCanaries 4 days ago +25
It's well past the time to even bother following the scotus rulings. They're not worth the paper they're written on
25
frommethodtomadness 4 days ago +23
One more stone in the path to the fascist Republican dream of the 'Unitary Executive' which is just their term for a literal dictator.
23
Responsible-Cap-8311 4 days ago +10
Steve Bannon is a very bad man
10
UnionGuyCanada 4 days ago +18
I will never understand how the US got to this place. Just a complete farce of a system where the rich are untouchable and the rest are slaves to be fed to the beast.    Hurry up and collapse already. Your idiocy is spreading to many other parts of the world and corrupting them.   Richest country in the history of the planet and it is completely corrupted for the ultra rich.
18
subsignalparadigm 4 days ago +10
SCOTUS returned this case because the prosecution pulled it. There really wasn't an option for SCOTUS. This is Trump helping his buddies in a way that follows the law. For this particular case, the spin is to make SCOTUS look bad rather than the real perpetrator, Trump.
10
Rogue_Einherjar 4 days ago +130
As soon as Dems take Congress, they need to label this admin as a domestic terrorist and use that to remove all judges that the domestic terrorist placed on the SC. Both terms. Then all the judges he placed throughout the country. I know it won't happen, cause they don't have a back bone, but it should happen like that.
130
Meat-Dimension 4 days ago +14
They wouldn’t have the power to do that. Possibly only if they gained a supermajority in both chambers which is essentially impossible
14
the_last_0ne 4 days ago +35
Who cares? We apparently do whatever we want now. Are we going to keep playing by rules that not everyone is playing by?
35
SpleenBender 4 days ago +8
Remember when Bannon said that if they lose the midterm elections, he is **GOING TO JAIL**‽ He needs to be locked the f*** up. Just like the rest of 'em. Also, put those traitorous J6 SHITBAGS back in jail. For the FIRST time in history, those assholes entered OUR nation's Capitol with their f****** disgusting confederate flag. They also left their *actual shit* on everything like goddamned troglodyte apes. They literally shat upon our country.
8
tdclark23 4 days ago +7
When Criminals are put in charge, criminals win.
7
Red_Wing-GrimThug 4 days ago +7
So congress doesn’t have a the power to hold people accountable? Only the man with the nuclear codes has any power? 😳
7
HoozleDoozle 4 days ago +4
Congress still has inherent contempt powers. Bannon was not charged under those powers. If he was, congress bypasses the courts and the DOJ. The DOJ has always been allowed to drop cases. This is the correct ruling.
4
Orposer 4 days ago +5
So we can all tell congresss to f*** off from here on out. Good to know
5
DiogneswithaMAGlight 4 days ago +5
He’s gonna f****** sue and the Govt will settle for MILLIONS of OUR TAX dollars going to….Steve F****** Bannon. We already gave Flynn $1.5M also the J6 guys are suing for over $20M. We are being robbed left right and center by the absolute dumbest people alive and we are just letting it happen.
5
ButtSpelunker420 4 days ago +6
The illegitimate Supreme Court must be dealt with before any other restoration can happen. 
6
MarlinMan2001 4 days ago +6
This POS was all about how he wasn’t on the inside of Washington power brokers and he wanted to f*** shit up and of course it all comes out he was hanging with Epstein and Gates and Clinton and worse then them combined. MAGA crowd is so stupid and easy to con, now we know who use to buy all the snake oil from the traveling snake oil salesman.
6
Yakassa 4 days ago +5
United states congress will soon have about as much power as an unplugged xbox controller.
5
furrysalesman69 4 days ago +6
He’s in the Epstein Files.
6
JeebusChristBalls 4 days ago +4
I love how these people can get a supreme court ruling for a f****** misdemeanor...
4
hackingdreams 4 days ago +5
Who is shocked that the Supreme Court is literally undoing Justice in America? Everyone in this court needs to be removed and disbarred. This is abhorrent.
5
GreyBeardEng 4 days ago +8
That would be Steve Bannon of the Epstein Island Steve Bannons.
8
Pinki-Blub 4 days ago +4
Willkommen in der Bananenrepublik
4
--Chug-- 4 days ago +5
I'm really getting sick of these criminals getting away with everything.
5
chaldea_fgo 4 days ago +4
It'd be cool if congress followed this up by impeaching a Justice. I mean checks and balances ya know
4
Idiot_Esq 4 days ago +5
Well there goes the entire concept of Separation of Powers. Time to leave the US as we are clearly on the march to a dictatorship.
5
Intro-Nimbus 4 days ago +4
Supreme court siding with the Epstein administration. Monday.
4
jiggythejigsaw 4 days ago +3
Just reminder Citizens. Laws and accountability for us. None for them. Especially if they are rich, politically connected or apart of the Trump/Epstein class.
3
Cubanitto 4 days ago +3
When you elect a Madman, his minions and him will do whatever they can for as long as they can. What we are witnessing, it seems like daily, is the direct results, of the absolute destruction of a system that was created over 250 years.
3
conn_r2112 4 days ago +5
Dems need to stack the court
5
hobo_at_a_library 4 days ago +4
A win for Steve Bannon is a win for evil.
4
sonicboomslang 4 days ago +7
How does this not make it to where no one ever has to respond to a Congressional subpoena? Doesn't this also hamstring congressional Republicans? Why would anyone ever respond to a subpoena ever again?
7
throw_away_17381 4 days ago +7
America is so corrupt it's surreal.
7
Abracadaver2000 4 days ago +3
I trust Nacho Supremes more than the Supreme Court nowadays. They're just cheerleading for a kakistocracy at this point.
3
dadjokes502 4 days ago +3
That works both ways then I guess Bill Hillary or whatever dem doesn’t have to worry anymore
3
TrumpsBoneSpur 4 days ago +3
Up next: the president can determine the w***** of elections. FDT
3
thatoneguy889 4 days ago +3
People are getting the wrong conclusions from this. The case isn't being decided on the merits of Bannon's argument and it's not setting any kind of precedent. It's being dismissed because it's on appeal and one of the sides (Trump's DOJ) is choosing to no longer pursue it. There's no case if the prosecutors don't want to prosecute, so SCOTUS is saying there's nothing to do and handed the decision to the side that's still bothering to justify itself.
3
t-mille 4 days ago +3
Bastards keep getting away with everything.
3
Wuzzy_Gee 4 days ago +3
Supreme Court = traitors
3
NoodleFish76 4 days ago +3
“We’re not fascists, but we love Steve Bannon!” The man who plotted to overthrow the government and embezzled build the wall charity money. I’m convinced MAGA is built around a 💩 f*****.
3
Euphoric_Anxiety_162 4 days ago +3
He is a convicted criminal & thief who belongs in jail. He appears to be a strong & vicious influence on trump's decisions. Not a person of peace & unity, ie. imo
3
AdventurousLet548 4 days ago +3
Why is SCOTUS undermining Congress?
3
rubio2k13 4 days ago +3
Buddies bailing out buddies
3
RandyArgonianButler 4 days ago +3
Wilhoit’s Law: “Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protectes but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”
3
Tdivarco 4 days ago +4
It’s a big club, and you ain’t in it!
4
LieutenantWeinberg 4 days ago +3
I know they won’t, but if Dems ever regain power they need to go scorched f****** earth
3
Malefic_Mike 4 days ago +3
Banon is all over the Epstein files, banon called Epstein "God". And I know the justices have to be keen to this. So they are ok with it.. they are protecting the Epstein club.
3
Encantatrix 4 days ago +3
F*** America at this point. What a cess pit.
3
badfile 4 days ago +3
tl;dr: DOJ under Biden led the prosecution of Bannon for contempt of Congress. He served 4 months. New DOJ under Trump wants to abandon / dismiss the case, but it can't do so without the court's permission. SCOTUS gave that permission and sent the final decision authority back to DC Circuit.
3
dashenyang 4 days ago +3
Congress did this to themselves. They pulled their own teeth out and gave their authority to the other branches.
3
fridder 4 days ago +3
F*** this court. Next dem in has to pack it
3
876050 4 days ago +3
Now we will have to pay him too
3
bros402 4 days ago +4
So, uh, Congress is no longer allowed to hold people in contempt for not complying with a subpoena?
4
bobosdreams 3 days ago +3
Taxpayers, get ready to write a big fat check to Steve Bannon. He was rightfully convicted in court with due process, and the Appeal Court upheld the ruling. The SC just did a huge favor to a Trump ally. They bend out of shape to curtail favors to Trump, time and time again.
3
Dauvis 4 days ago +5
Illegitimate court issues illegitimate partisan ruling. Let's call them for what they are.
5
PizzaSluht420 4 days ago +7
Shame is something these conservative justices are not capable of feeling... 😞
7
starbuckle337 4 days ago +6
We all watched him be in contempt. We watched it. F*** the justice system, tear it down.
6
← Back to Board