Of course, more dominoes are left to fall. The helium is a big deal, it's needed for everything from processor manufacturing to medical imaging, and the urea production largely takes place in China, Russia and the Gulf countries... Not good for farmers in the new world. Their crop input costs (fuel and fertilizer) are going ballistic, which means food prices will follow suit.
441
S1gorJabjong4 days ago
+312
Really head scratching thing is, many people don't realize the severity of the current crisis. It's like they all suddenly forgot how the Ukraine-Russia war turned out for the global economy. The media downplaying the consequences might be playing a role here.
312
NeedleworkerWaste6134 days ago
+224
The media tries so hard to make Trump look rational that they CAN'T report the nature of the consequences. There was more of an effort during his first term, but the media failed us then, too.
224
musiccman20204 days ago
+109
It's reported on in Europe just fine.
The u.s. has been severely compromised at tlevety level
109
Heisenberg_2354 days ago
+31
By design.
“Smart people don’t like me”
31
D0ntEatPaper4 days ago
+9
Wasn't the doofus proud of that? lmao
9
Heisenberg_2354 days ago
+11
Well, he got voted in. Twice. Him and his family have made a shit load of money as a result of it.
So yes, I think he would be proud of it.
11
solidddd3 days ago
+2
F*** we hit tlevety level?? When did that happen!?
2
happy123z4 days ago
+10
We are attacking the world by cutting off their oil, gas, fertilizer and helium amongst other things. When will someone say this? USA and IZ declare war on the world.
10
Schlonzig4 days ago
+50
Because most people will only realize it once it hits their wallet. And then they will blame whoever is in charge then, not the fools running the ship right now.
50
Subconcious-Consumer4 days ago
+23
Fortunately or unfortunately this administrations mis steps are so great in size that it will absolutely be felt during their term. They have less than a year before this mess they created is a steaming pile of dogshit.
23
Local-Accident46294 days ago
+27
surely they won't blame the previous administration right?
27
Haru1st4 days ago
+24
No. Clearly it’s Obama’s fault. Get with the program!
24
Heisenberg_2354 days ago
+11
No no no. Hillary’s emails mate, that’s the issue
11
DragoonDM3 days ago
+4
I can't believe Hunter Biden's laptop would do this to us.
4
Ediwir3 days ago
+3
This is clearly because of Clinton’s tax hikes (and the resulting economic boom).
3
happy123z4 days ago
+2
What was Hoover THINKING!?
2
DowntownNoLonger4 days ago
+7
This administration has 3 years left. It'll hit our wallets before then. Gas is going to hit 6 bucks a gallon this summer, I'm almost positive of it.
Seeing those signs on every street corner can't be ignored, no matter what the media might say.
7
Fractal_Strike3 days ago
+8
Worse, there was a new digital sign being installed near me in NJ last week. It was adding a fourth digit (green for diesel). Gas companies know what's coming.
8
DowntownNoLonger3 days ago
+6
Yup. Heard a rumor about gas companies listing prices as half gallon instead, just so it feels less expensive.
They know.
6
bobbycorwin1233 days ago
+3
Time to switch to liters
3
ruskyandrei4 days ago
+15
To be fair, the Ukraine-Russia war shock happened before the world managed to recover from Covid (inflation was still much higher already when the war started, and the war drove that even higher)
15
Haru1st4 days ago
+7
To be fair, special interests apparently can’t stop raking it in the hyperinflationary environment and are putting their financial might behind making sure inflation stops going down, despite most national banks’ best efforts to counter this. As of yet there is no mechanism to prove this manipulation, let alone one capable of holding such individuals accountable.
7
S1gorJabjong4 days ago
+3
Yeah that's true. Headline inflation back then wouldn't have been as high as it was if the war didn't happen. In the IMF World Economy Outlook 2022 suggested that the amount of inflation post Covid monetary policies brought to the US economy were estimated to be around +1.8%, but the war added a +1.8%~3.3% increase on top of that.
3
EndOfDecadence4 days ago
+14
I don't know if its the media only. Its like a lot of people are just sick of disruptions, and are acting like nothing is happening. Also, if you are in the industry you see the effects already for a while, if you only look at prices/markets/stocks, its still not clear to people what actually is going on.
14
DowntownNoLonger4 days ago
+4
My local CBS news reported a few days ago, I kid you not, "...a look at how President Trump successfully negotiated a ceasefire agreement."
At this point the 4th estate is just a propaganda arm for this administration. Completely disconnected from reality.
It's going to take gas prices over 6 bucks a gallon and troops on the ground in Iran to wake my idiot fellow Americans out of this stupor.
4
Haru1st4 days ago
+1
What do you mean?
Egg prices are down.
/s
1
Fruitypuff4 days ago
+2
Basically Covid all over again, some countries will feel the shock first, media will downplay it, Trump will sell our reserves (paid by with Tax dollars btw) to the highest bidder or to his friends. Media will continue to downplay the impact as everything collapses (supply chain strain, supply issues). Trump will blame it on everything but, give a speech how it will all be resolved by next two weeks or spring, it will be a miracle. While job losses and inflation tear through all safety nets, and democrats won’t do sht because they will care more about keeping their spots and will just posture.
2
Divinicus2nd4 days ago
+1
A good part of the claimed impacts of the Ukraine-Russia war was actual the impact of Covid policies. It’s easier to blame inflation on a war, than the billions you’ve printed yourself.
This crisis is still very big, but let’s not change history.
1
S1gorJabjong4 days ago
+1
Didn't say anything about post Covid policies not being a part of those inflation numbers though. They've contributed at least about +1.8% each from the 2% target inflation level for the US.
1
treadingslowly4 days ago
+25
I just pray that the farmers turn on Trump. My guess though is that they will just get huge bailouts and the farmers will just double down on their support for Trump.
25
smailskid4 days ago
+26
They might think about turning on Trump, but them they’ll remember that time a black guy was President and that people may think they’re gay if they vote Democrat, so the idea will die right then and there.
26
SerArlanTX4 days ago
+6
As a guy who works in agricultural feed manufacturing, this is exactly what will happen.
6
GreatPlainsFarmer4 days ago
+7
At the moment, they think this is temporary. A lot think that it will all be resolved in a few months.
They might start waking up by November.
7
NeedleworkerWaste6134 days ago
+3
Farmers are hard core base Republicans (Conservatives, up here in area 51).
Remember FarmAid? It's still going on. It was started by hard core right wingers like Neil Young and Willie Nelson to bail farmers out of the disastrous Reagan policies.
They know that. They couldn't care less. Not to over-generalize like a meathead or anything
3
Strange_Valuable_5734 days ago
+3
They won’t. This is all worth it to them because how dare someone dye their hair blue and have different ideas in America.
3
pittguy5784 days ago
+3
Going to dollar general and stocking up on helium canisters. Going to get rich
3
Cdub77914 days ago
+2
Bromine for semiconductor etching too. While it doesn't pass through the strait, most is made in Israel and is highly vulnerable if another round of missile exchanges occurs.
2
Odd-Disaster73932 days ago
+1
Guess they gotta collect our pee.
1
Neutral-frame4 days ago
+161
And again the poor will suffer for the actions of a few rich people. Rinse and repeat.
161
Sufficient-Will36444 days ago
+6
Well, the US and other countries managed to combat that trend, but you needed to get the poor acting together in union. I forget what kind of organization made that possible.
6
MercantileReptile4 days ago
+88
>Roughly one-third of global fertilizer trade passes through the Strait of Hormuz, making the route critical for supplies of urea and ammonia—key nitrogen-based inputs used in farming worldwide.
But the Americans are fine, so it's all well and good. Good grief. This will screw with at least a season worth of food production in the poorest countries.
Even for wealthy countries, the timing just plain sucks. *Everything* getting more expensive at once is a great recipe for social unrest.
88
Neat_Key_60294 days ago
+55
Americans are NOT fine. They will be affected too.
55
BenVarone4 days ago
+36
Yep. Unless you’re in (at least) the top 10% *in America*, you will feel all of this acutely. That top 10% aren’t immune either, but they just have to cut out a few luxuries and life probably feels similar to before.
The Epstein class won’t even notice unless their stock portfolios take a big hit.
36
Gender_is_a_Fluid3 days ago
+7
People don’t get that unless america bans exporting, even if we produce everything 100% locally prices will rise since companies will export to foreign markets for greater profits. Everything affects everyone now.
7
marx2k4 days ago
+29
American farmers got right fucked this year with fertilizer as well. Harvest time 2026 is going to be really f****** ugly.
29
Sufficient-Will36444 days ago
+11
Don’t worry about it. When the US put the tariffs on Canadian potash, you secured a supply from Belarus.
11
NeedleworkerWaste6134 days ago
+5
Their input costs are WAY up. Yet they're reliably Republican - even though FarmAid (started by neo-cons like Neil Young, Willie Nelson and John Mellenkamp) in response to disastrous Reagan policies.
5
Gender_is_a_Fluid3 days ago
+4
Well, most of them voted for this.
4
marx2k3 days ago
Yup they did
0
doneandtired20143 days ago
+2
>American farmers got right fucked this year with fertilizer as well
As an American:
The vast majority of those farmers are getting exactly what they voted for and they absolutely deserve all of the horrible shit getting ready to head their way.
2
marx2k3 days ago
They absolutely are
0
ExpressGovernment4204 days ago
+13
Not just poor countries. Most of European farming has been unprofitable for a while already. Input costs rise, outputs remain the same.
Not with even more expensive fuel and fertiliser costs, a lot of Latvian farmers are considering if it is even viable to plant this year. Only those with stockpile or leftovers are good to go.
But obviously everyone will plant, just will mean even more subsidies from government. That will mean even deeper financial crisis.
Fix would be simple, we city folks pay much higher prices for produce. But obviously we won’t do that.
13
fedroxx4 days ago
+7
Netanyahu and Trump need to be held responsible for this. Both need to be arrested and tried.
7
play_images4 days ago
+3
No buddy, our farmers are screaming right now. They need this bad, and the window is closing. On top of the AI bubble, we in for a rough couple years bois
3
MobiusF1174 days ago
+1
> Everything getting more expensive at once is a great recipe for social unrest.
All by design.
1
Totheendofsin4 days ago
+1
Americans will be impacted because the prices of fertilizer will go up everywhere as other countries seek other sources of it
1
ChadFullStack4 days ago
+47
I think it’s time for Canada to add export tax on potash since US doesn’t need Canada.
47
NomsAreManyComrade4 days ago
+7
Potash and nitrogen-based fertilisers are not the same or substitutes for each other, and the former is not in short supply right now.
7
RarelyReadReplies3 days ago
+2
When I saw the headline, being from Canada, I googled if we have an abundance of those resources, and it seems like we do. What am I missing?
2
CaptainMagnets3 days ago
+2
May I asked what the difference is between the two?
2
Weird_farmer133 days ago
+4
Basically they both do different things for the plant. Kind of like how your body needs both protein and fibre, a plant needs both potash and nitrogen. Typically more nitrogen than anything else as well. And a very large amount of our nitrogen (also called urea) is imported. Fertilizer is also one of the more expensive inputs
4
CaptainMagnets3 days ago
+2
Thank you for answering!
2
Edgefactor3 days ago
+2
One comes from Canada
2
RarelyReadReplies3 days ago
+3
Both do from what I read.
3
thc2me3 days ago
+1
Sadly, any country that has what USA wants (and therefore will be classed as a national security risk) is under real threat of them coming to take it or take power over it. USA is going to be coming for Canadian fresh water in the near future I think; if this plays out Canada with either sign a deal to supply or face significant hostilities…
1
jigsaw1534 days ago
+80
Famine is coming
80
Budelius4 days ago
+11
Not sure if anecdotal or based on math/science, but a common refrain I've seen on the internet over many years now is that if global food demand exceeds food supply for about 6 weeks, demand will no longer exceed supply. Truly morbid but seems intuitive.
11
Lostinthestarscape3 days ago
+2
Well with climate the way its headed, wont be long before an equatorial death band claims a billion people. So maybe this is a good trial balloon for mass die offs.
/s
2
False_Raven4 days ago
+18
When is it due?
18
jigsaw1534 days ago
+37
1. When the world runs out of urea and fertilizer to grow crops. Yields will drop significantly without it.
and/or
2. Once the price of urea and fuel outweighs the cost of the crop. Farmers will not plant crops if they lose money.
and/or
3. The price of food is so high due to 1. and 2. above, that many cannot afford to eat.
Any nation under food stress before this happened is going to really hurt from here on out. You will see nations that had good food security before this blockade experience food stress.
37
Tack_it4 days ago
+13
Don't forget sulfur, needed for potassium fertilizer production from rock phosphate.
13
Dr_barfenstein4 days ago
+9
The world has already had a sneak preview of this. Sri Lanka was going broke so they banned imports of synth fertiliser for one season. It went as well as you’d think. Now multiply that by a lot of countries. Lot of pain incoming if the big boys can’t play nice.
https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2022/7/15/23218969/sri-lanka-organic-fertilizer-pesticide-agriculture-farming
9
GreatPlainsFarmer4 days ago
+11
This affects about 10% of global fertilizer production. 1/3 of trade, 10% of production.
The effects will be very unevenly distributed.
11
Optimus_Prime_Day3 days ago
+2
Don't forget scarcity, as farmers have less fertilizer, they plant less, so costs get boosted significantly based on scarcity.
2
europeanputin4 days ago
+19
Depends, in some places it's already famine, in other places like the western world we haven't endured large scale shortages yet. As we are in ENSO neutral and heading to El Niño, the spring of 2027 will be very interesting as that will also have a major impact on crops. So if we are to put a number on it, I'd say autumn 2027 will be the time when society will seriously start looking back at our inaction in dealing with the warming planet. Whether it will lead anywhere other than more resource gathering by those who can or heavy reforms, time will tell.
19
jigsaw1533 days ago
+3
Australian farmers just said they do not plan to seed a summer crop due to cost.
Australia grows food to feed 100 million people for a 27 million population and is a major food exporter.
3
EndOfDecadence4 days ago
+14
Good thing the west decimated its foreign aid programs.
14
pass_nthru4 days ago
+11
needed that money to bomb gaza and give tax breaks to fat pigs, couldn’t be helped
11
Ouch2594 days ago
+20
Trump tried to kill the farmers off by destroying their sales markets. This is him just coming back to finish the job with fertilizer and diesel cost increases.
Good thing the republicans did not cut rural health care and food stamps- lol
20
redditforeducation4 days ago
+8
Asian Boss YT channel did a deep dive on this a couple of weeks back: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9hSsmd49p8](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9hSsmd49p8)
8
whatdabee4 days ago
+4
Noooo waaay, no one saw this coming
4
TheRealTinfoil6663 days ago
+6
Wow.
As a Canadian, sure am glad we have our own huge internal sources for Oil&Gas, Helium, and Potash.
Trump has said that the United States does not need anything from Canada, so those guys should be OK too.
6
Lostinthestarscape3 days ago
+1
Sure wish we built some refineries in thr past hundred years.
1
TheRealTinfoil6663 days ago
+1
Other than the 18 refineries we already have, you mean!?
1
Lostinthestarscape3 days ago
+1
I always hear we have fucked ourselves over by not being able to produce the fuel we need such that we have to sell our crude to America and buy lots of it back. So whether or not we have them, we apparently have far too little capacity to produce what we would need to be a self sufficient.
1
TheRealTinfoil6662 days ago
+1
the refining shortage is partially 'not in the best places', combined with a lack of capacity to EXPORT refined products.
The lament historically is that we supply a lot of crude oil, but tend to ship the raw product away for someone else to get the value-added for refinement.
Nt Gas is different, as it needs little refinement but does need pipelines, which we have underbuilt in the East.
1
Weird_farmer133 days ago
+1
Unfortunately we still import a ton of urea (nitrogen fertilizer)
1
dkf2954 days ago
+3
Not to mention aluminum - both directly, and from copper as well which is highly affected. I work in an industry that uses a lot of aluminum and costs have absolutely skyrocketed.
3
Elukka3 days ago
+3
Fertilizer prices are going up pretty much everywhere. A huge number of Finnish farmers are saying they're going to use less fertilizer than planned or not planting everything they planned originally. Fertilizer prices tripling is no joke anywhere since farming is typically low-margins work.
This is going to be a global food issue that's going to unfold in the next 9 months. If this continues for a month longer we're looking at food prices shooting up and at least regional food shortages.
3
turb0_encapsulator3 days ago
+3
S&P at an all time high!
3
polypaulpoly3 days ago
+2
All going according to plan for trumpstien.
2
Independent_Fall41134 days ago
+2
Naphtha is another big one. Precursor to Make plastics. It will make prices of many things rise.
2
play_images4 days ago
+2
There it is. Moron kept going on about how we have oil like that's the only f****** thing we need from the region. God damn moron is gonna cause a famine. Planting season is closing soon. Crop yeilds will be way less than normal. You can't just "fix" that. No matter how you spin it
2
AVKetro3 days ago
+1
Time to go back to bird poop
1
ZerozGM4 days ago
-52
Crude oil isn’t a big part of our countries fertilizers anyways.
Think it’s natural gas
-52
omnibossk4 days ago
+12
Doesn’t really matter, the world supply of both oil and LNG transported trough Hormuz are the same. The ratio is 20% of the world supply for both
12
Subietoy784 days ago
+33
Everyone is less intelligent for having read this
33
WestBrink4 days ago
-7
I mean. They're right...
Natural gas is steam reformed to make hydrogen which is reacted with Nitrogen in the Haber Bosch process to make ammonia. Crude doesn't come into it.
Edit: y'all are weird with the down votes. I've spent the last 15 years of my life dealing with crude and steam methane reformers...
-7
MikeW2264 days ago
+6
Anhydrous ammonia I think they call it. On farms, it's pulled around on trailer chassis's that have a 500 or 1000 gallon sausage-shaped tank on the trailer. Looks like a huge rural liquid propane tank like for home heating.
6
Tack_it4 days ago
+3
That's nitrogen, what about phosphorus and potassium?
You might look into where our sulfur comes from and how that interacts with phosphorus and potassium
3
GreatPlainsFarmer4 days ago
-2
Canada has mountains of sulfur. At some price point, they will be mobilized.
-2
Tack_it4 days ago
+3
Google two things
"Where does sulfur come from"
That should tell you it is a sour crude byproduct.
Next Google "highest sour crude production fields"
Now tell me where Canada falls?
(I'll give you a hint, it doesn't rank.)
3
GreatPlainsFarmer4 days ago
-3
Tar sands. Some of the highest sulfur content in the world.
At this point, they have large stockpiles of sulfur. For a while, their export capacity would be limited only by rail capacity.
Canada is the second largest sulfur exporter already.
-3
TheDude_4 days ago
+3
Which means logistically speaking they are not in a position to provide relief in the next 6 months. Which means it doesn't exist as a current solution.
3
Subietoy784 days ago
-9
Everyone is less intelligent for having read this
-9
Special_K_20124 days ago
-13
Overreaction. Priced in and will barely impact macro.
-13
Logical_Still_98564 days ago
-25
It’s a good thing that Europe is on the side of Iran in this conflict. That should help resolve it much more quickly. Let’s see how this works out for them.
-25
SsurebreC4 days ago
+3
> It’s a good thing that Europe is on the side of Iran in this conflict.
How is Europe siding with Iran on this? Are they providing logistics, aid, or weapons? I mean technically Russia is in Europe so if you mean *part* of Europe is on the side of Iran then this is true since Russia is their ally. If you mean countries like the UK, Germany, France, etc, then what are you talking about? If they're not helping the US then it doesn't mean they're siding with Iran.
3
dkf2954 days ago
+2
>Mr. Bush said many countries have offered sympathy and support to the United States. The rest, he said, face a choice. "Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists," he said.
Those that don't learn from history...
2
AbdulGoodlooks4 days ago
+1
Perhaps the United States shouldn't have switched over to Russia's side regarding Ukraine if it wanted Europe to help, since we're doing ridiculous hyperboles now
111 Comments