· 199 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events May 14, 2026 at 9:28 AM

Sweeping California law on single-use plastic meets with outrage from all sides as it goes live

Posted by Kooolxxx


Sweeping California law on single-use plastic meets with outrage from all sides as it goes live
Los Angeles Times
Sweeping California law on single-use plastic meets with outrage from all sides as it goes live
California's long anticipated single-use plastic law is now in effect. Environmentalists and anti-waste activists are suing, saying loopholes make it toothless and even harmful.

🚩 Report this post

199 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
JACofalltrades0 1 day ago +3214
For everyone who only reads the headline: The main people taking issue with this are environmental groups who don't like the loopholes baked into the law that allow companies to skirt regulations and the ability for companies to start recycling plastic chemically which produces a lot of hazardous waste. Next up are concerns from other groups who recognize that the law doesn't do anything to stop companies from passing costs directly on to consumers. There's two paragraphs referencing company spokespeople either threatening lawsuits or calling the costs "exorbitant", but it's not exactly being met with outrage from "all sides". It's a law that was written in such a way that no one who wants action taken on single use plastic makes any progress in that regard. But, if you only read the headline, you'd get the impression that people are mad they can't get plastic bags at walmart anymore despite the fact that there's no reference in this article to consumer backlash.
3214
The_Count_Lives 1 day ago +821
This should be at the top.  They’ve taken an article about corporate malfeasance and tricked you into thinking it’s just people whining about plastic bags. 
821
saanity 1 day ago +219
The media is not on your side. 
219
HoldingForGenova 1 day ago +75
Especially not the LA Times, with its current owner.
75
coopnjaxdad 1 day ago +21
The media those corporations own, go figure.
21
Desblade101 1 day ago +129
I liked the line that food prices will go up, but waste costs won't go down because it implies that the food producers have no control over their own packaging and that if packaging costs go up by 15x they won't find an alternative. I believe the market will find a cheaper alternative.
129
breadwhore 1 day ago +43
This. If the only solution is to push packaging prices onto consumers, then consumers will find alternate products. Which is the point. The market will then force these companies to find alternate packaging to compete. The article mentions as an example windex bottles. Great example. Is there a way to refill the bottles rather than buying a new plastic bottle each time? There are refill bottles (also plastic) that refill like 2? 3? sprayers. Can we do better? Can windex do a return program for those refill bottles where you bring one back to the store with your purchase of a new one and get a credit? The store can ship them back on the empty trucks. I don't know if this is THE solution, but it shows that there are solutions and that the manufacturers should be putting effort into this too.
43
DimestoreAnselAdams 1 day ago +17
We use a product called JAWS (Just Add Water System), which is just refill cartridges for a single bottle. They make a half dozen cleaners that all work pretty well. I'll wait for someone to come along and say that the cartridges have just as much plastic as a new bottle.
17
Silver-Bread4668 1 day ago +12
I've started doing similar stuff. There's plenty of products out there that offer concentrated or powder stuff where you can add water and just keep reusing the bottles you have. Not just Windex or similar products but soap, laundry detergent, dish detergent, etc. I've seen products that come in reusable/recyclable metal containers, harder paper containers, paper pouches, etc. It's not that much of an adjustment to get use to it and, reducing plastic use aside, it seems like it's a lot more cost effective and environmentally friendly to not ship what is, effectively, massive numbers of containers that are mostly just water all over the country.
12
SirStrontium 22 hr ago +3
Yeah I've really gotten into solid shampoo over the last few years. Why mess with a big plastic bottle that's mostly water? A little bar that comes in a small cardboard box just makes sense.
3
Substantial_Desk_670 1 day ago +4
The cartridges... and that plastic holding ring... I dunno.
4
uzlonewolf 23 hr ago +2
> There are refill bottles (also plastic) that refill like 2? 3? sprayers. At work we get Windex refills in a 3 or 5 gallon "Bag-in-Box" that has a thin plastic bag (holds the liquid) inside a cardboard box (for structural support). *Way* less plastic than plastic bottle refills.
2
AdCreepy5165 1 day ago +9
No ones happy, it must be a good law.
9
Lonely_Nebula_9438 1 day ago +15
>  that the law doesn't do anything to stop companies from passing costs directly on to consumers. It shouldn’t. Plastic is used because it’s dirt c****, that’s the whole point. Plastics helped bring down costs by paying less for packaging. If you are forcing a company to use more expensive packaging materials then it’s unreasonable to make them still sell their now more expensive to produce product at the previous price.  Now there’s a lot of things that are more expensive than they should be, and that’s a problem in of itself, but if you forced everyone to take a loss on packaging materials than you’re severely disadvantaging business who aren’t exploiting their customers. Solving corporate overcharging is an entirely separate problem to be solved.
15
SaltyShawarma 1 day ago +30
California needs to stop kowtowing to corporations. Gavin Newsom f****** sucks at this. He's in their pockets.
30
bros402 1 day ago +29
> Gavin Newsom f****** sucks f****** you can say it the word is f******
29
ailish 1 day ago +19
Yes, this was left out of the synopsis. This was the work of the Gavin Newsom administration. The very same one who so many people want for president.
19
AcheyTaterHeart 1 day ago +8
Fr dude had hundreds of employees working on draft rules for YEARS before he decided he wanted to seem business-friendly for his 2028 presidential run and forced a complete rewrite of the regulations. He’s a terrible governor and a terrible boss. Please do not vote for him to get promoted to president.
8
ailish 1 day ago +3
He wasn't a bad mayor, less of an impressive govenor, but still not the worst, but now that he's eyeing that White House he's a total corporate stooge. Far from my first choice, or second, or third. I live in Michigan, and it's the same for Whitmer. She wasn't my first choice for govenor, but she did a halfway decent job during covid, not perfect, but given the circumstances she did her best. Plus her trolling of Trump was amazing. But in the last year she's just given it up badly. Not much indication that she wants the White House, but there are rumors.
3
RacerDelux 1 day ago +3
Seems like a pretty typical neo lib style law. Masked with environmental friendliness, but protects companies and gives consumers the sort end of the stick.
3
VibraniumQueen 1 day ago +2
I mean anyone who lives in NJ or other places where plastic bags are banned from stores should realize there must be more to this story, since straws and bags being banned have gone over okay here.
2
Feisty_Blood_6036 21 hr ago +2
Environmental groups should mostly be concerned by the fact that such laws usually just increase energy and plastic consumption. Banning single use plastic doesn’t stop someone from single using multi use products, which just have more plastic, often by a lot. If only like 1/100 people now throw away more durable products, the overall waste can go UP.  Changes need to be much broader than simply banning certain use. If we paid a deposit for bags, which we could return for money, we’d see a lot less waste and truly incentivize reuse and recycling 
2
Samski877 1 day ago +8020
I think what annoys people most is realising that for years the burden got pushed onto ordinary consumers to carefully rinse, sort and recycle everything while companies kept flooding stores with more single use plastic than ever. A lot of people genuinely thought they were helping solve the problem and now it turns out huge amounts of that plastic was never realistically getting recycled anyway.
8020
ffghtffyrdmns 1 day ago +2689
I don't think people understand how much work they should be doing on recycling, or how much they have been lied to about recycling 😞
2689
Garvilan 1 day ago +2707
Also, the amount of waste consumers produced is f****** nothing compared to waste produced by corporations and agriculture. Our recycling isn't meaningless, but without a serious EPA and corporate accountability, we can recycle all we want it won't matter literally at all. 
2707
Equivalent-Resort-63 1 day ago +692
Corporations will do nothing if it doesn’t increase the bottom line and the EPA…. well we all know that’s corpse currently being dissected and buried in pieces.
692
loose_fruits 1 day ago +443
That can’t be true, just last week I had to take a corporate-mandated training on reducing waste and how to be a good steward for the environment. So you see it’s really my fault both as a consumer and as a corporate drone. The poor corporations are just trying to rake in the cash and it’s really on us peons to do things like “care”
443
zughzz 1 day ago +231
I worked at a store, corporations will throw away healthy, just fine product away that very well many people would take, but because it’s been sitting on the shelves too long and they haven’t made a dollar, they trash it. No not donating, not giving away, trashing it. Everyday, every store, every warehouse, hundreds of locations. Trashing culture in business is very common
231
Littleman88 1 day ago +251
To discourage people from waiting for clearance of perishables, they'd sooner just destroy perfectly good product. Corporations are the most wasteful entities on the planet, and everything they do is motivated by greed and spite. *Everything*.
251
morelamplz 1 day ago +56
Trader Joe’s doesn’t. When I worked there at least, we donated everything we could to the food bank or shelters. (And I heard it’s still a thing) Every night it’s at least one person’s job to comb over the store and pull anything damaged/expired/close to expired-including fresh fruit and produce with no expiration date (bruised apples, bagged celery with a brown spot, etc). We were instructed that even if it was just a little damaged or still a few days from expiring just to go ahead and write it off, because we didn’t want to even possibly sell something subpar but also that it would be nice because then someone in need would get something good. We had multiple carts absolutely full waiting for them and even 1-2 employees ready to help them load up every appt. Seeing it all was really a testament to how much can go to waste due to corporate greed. However, it was nice knowing that at least in this case it was all going to those in need.
56
ziggy-zaz 13 hr ago +4
Another reason to shop at Trader Joe’s!
4
RiotForYourHealth 11 hr ago +2
I actually used to get a few of Trader Joe’s products sometimes at the food banks in the PNW. It was crazy though, I was getting food for me and my partner and two kids so it was like 80lbs of food. I had these two huge waterproof bags for camping and I would load them up and carry one my back and one on my chest, each bag about 40 lbs and I would take the bus but still had to walk about a mile. It was brutal. I only weigh like 130 and was probably more like 110 at the time. Was under a lot of stress and I totally lose my appetite when I get emotionally distressed like that.
2
sirbassist83 1 day ago +56
its 100% greed, but spite and greed dont look very different. actually for the koch brothers sometimes its spite, but i think theyre the exception.
56
CharleyNobody 1 day ago +20
Your reminder that the father of the Koch Brothers, Fred C Koch, was a founding member of the John Birch Society .
20
sirbassist83 1 day ago +15
also, fred koch helped design and build a major refinery for the nazis.
15
Wow_u_sure_r_dumb 1 day ago +8
If we make it they’ll talk about us in history books with such utter contempt.
8
screaminginfidels 1 day ago +5
Our childrens children will only know the natural beauty of the world through images and recited memories.
5
AcheyTaterHeart 1 day ago +23
CA has a law that should disallow stores from doing that, so if this is ongoing and in CA please rat these wasteful buggers out to their local jurisdiction, you can file an online complaint through CalRecycle
23
zughzz 1 day ago +9
I didn’t know that, thanks for sharing thats a bright side. I’m in Texas though, and I see it everywhere
9
asylumgreen 1 day ago +7
I’m not saying it’s good that they do that, obviously, but changing takes effort and money. Determining who it can go to, coordinating with when they can take it, paying for employee hours to figure this out, etc. It’s not free and it’s not without effort. And it brings in no money. It’s logical from a cost perspective (which is a business’ purpose for existing) to throw it away. This is why we need to rely on regulations to force it, not businesses choosing to do it, because they won’t (and arguably shouldn’t).
7
theaviationhistorian 1 day ago +2
And with so many food banks and pantries desperate for donations. Especially with this recession in full force. *But that's wasting fuel and employees in giving free food to the peasants!?! Pshaww, the shareholders will not be pleased with that!*
2
IOl0I0lO 21 hr ago +2
It’s The Grapes of Wrath all over again!
2
TheDougie3-NE 1 day ago +32
Yeah, they told us that three weeks ago and last week they took away the individual recycling bins from our cubes. “Too much extra work for our cleaning crew. Not in their contract…” Before the pandemic, we outgrew our corporate office downtown. Access to mass transit (buses), bike-friendly location, and short commuting distances were high on the official search criteria. We ended up with a building in a part of the city where nobody lives, the nearest bus stop is 2.5 miles away, and on a major highway with no safe bike access at all. Things never change.
32
mn540 1 day ago +20
At my wife’s work, they banned garbage cans in offices. Garbage can is in the hallway. They did it to save on janitorial services. So now my wife walks down the halls couple times a day. Multiple that by several thousands of staff, and you wonder what type of time saving they really are getting. My office now makes us dump our garbage into larger bins. I do that once a week. Now that is time saving.
20
snivlem_lice 1 day ago +7
They did this at an old job I worked at. It was completely ridiculous, and they framed it as “we’re being environmentally conscious by cutting down on plastic liners”. It was annoying and clearly used to cut down on janitorial but if you remotely spoke up about it everyone gnashed their teeth at you. We had three different bins set up on each floor (plastics, organic, and non-recyclables). And periodically throughout the day, the janitorial staff would roll about a big can and just dump all three together into one big bag and throw it in the dumpster. But yeah, it was a great cause.
7
sirbassist83 1 day ago +2
my company just moved. im a machinist, but we outsource a lof of our parts. they reduced the size of the CNC shop, i lost my office altogether, and they expect it to showroom clean at all times because the entire point of the move was to turn us into a hub for customers. all i asked for in the new building was more space because it was already too cramped...
2
jebei 1 day ago +11
If you go to any dollar store, you'll notice they don't have trash cans in front of their stores. Trash cans used to be common at every gas station and store to encourage people not to litter. But trash cans mean they have to pay someone to empty them so they were cut out as a cost of doing business. So what do a portion of people do instead? They throw their trash on the ground and soon the parking lot of a dollar store begin to look like well ... what we've come to expect from a dollar store - dirty, trashy, and c****.
11
prospectre 1 day ago +7
> Corporations will do nothing if it doesn’t increase the bottom line The alternative is to make it *reduce* the bottom line if they don't comply. Every single infraction should cost **more** than what they save for ignoring it. Every one of them.
7
FatherDotComical 1 day ago +31
I worked at Walmart and *one* bundle of packages had to be wrapped in layers and layers of plastic wrapped, then all of that was individually wrapped and we haven't even reached the consumer part inside of the cardboard box yet. And that's *one* thing. Imagine how many shipments Walmart gets in a day. The plastic use is terrifying and ungodly. Imagine a human's entire lifetime of plastic waste, gone and used up in 5 minutes.
31
NefariousAntiomorph 1 day ago +18
Walmart’s apparel shipments are disgusting when it comes to overuse of plastic. Hundreds of items arrive individually wrapped sometimes with extra plastic sheets between the layers of each item. Then all of that comes in bigger bags in boxes stacked on a plastic wrapped pallet. The consumer sees literally none of that.
18
AgitatedStranger9698 1 day ago +55
We buy 500 pallets a day.....we trash them... everyone.
55
DrEarlGreyIII 1 day ago +19
Surely someone comes around to take the pallets and resell them?
19
acoustic11 1 day ago +39
Yeah pallet buybacks are absolutely a thing
39
DrEarlGreyIII 1 day ago +29
we used them all the time when i managed a warehouse. i dunno why people would pay to throw them out when they can get paid to sell them back 🤷‍♂️
29
itisrainingweiners 1 day ago +21
Our local businesses give them to the fire department to use for burn training. It's really the only use they've found for them as no one buys pallets.
21
DrEarlGreyIII 1 day ago +10
that’s a cool way to get rid of them
10
romanticheart 1 day ago +9
Have you tried advertising on Facebook marketplace? You’d be surprised what people will buy for DIY stuff.
9
techleopard 1 day ago +4
fr, I cannot get my hands on pallets to save my life. People used to say you could go get old ones from businesses and take them apart yourself. Now there's companies that go around and get them and then try to sell them for as much as standard lumber. Like, no thanks, man. I'm not going to pay for used, wore-out pallet wood full of nails that I still have to take apart when I could spend the same money and get lumber.
4
hamoc10 1 day ago +3
Yes! Wood is expensive!
3
wordsx1000 1 day ago +3
At my last job, and as a “wood guy,” I’d occasionally run across pallets with a few boards of nice hardwoods used in its construction like bubinga, rosewoods, Pau rosa, Sapelle, Goncalo Alves, figured walnut and cherry, canarywood, and olivewood to name a few. Granted, it was wood we were shipping in, so perhaps wood suppliers build or repair pallets with their scrap. And what fine scrap it was.
3
squeagy 1 day ago +6
I planed a trashy pallet and it was beautiful cherry under the dirt and discoloration. Absolutely beautiful wood grain and smelled fantastic.
6
itisrainingweiners 1 day ago +3
I'm on the fire dept end of the equation, so I don't have to worry about it!
3
Aktuator 1 day ago +2
We sell our pallets weekly. It’s a neat little $300 check every Friday .
2
Kewkky 1 day ago +30
We have no say in how they package any of those 500 pallets. We simply buy because we want to or need to buy. Those that do the packaging are the ones who should have the responsibility of ensuring the packaging isn't single-use plastics. It's far easier to change things if you change the one major culprit (the packaging company) than virtually unlimited smaller culprits (consumers).
30
Future-Side4440 1 day ago +4
I’ll take your plastic pallets. I have a cousin in a wheelchair that uses them for bridges through swamp land for hunting.
4
Garvilan 1 day ago +12
Yep. We produce flight critical aerospace parts, and we build our own pallets for their shipping and travel back and forth to sub-suppliers. It is absolutely insane how f****** inept most forklift and truck drivers are. Our well built pallets need to be replaced almost ever single month, and we waste SO MUCH lumbar because of it. It is incredible.
12
Maximum_Indication 1 day ago +53
Hard on the back to lift those pallets.
53
71351 1 day ago +8
At least there is a lumbar yard nearby that can service your needs. Mention Hal Kitsmueller’s name for a d*******! Sleep well my friend
8
spyboy70 1 day ago +7
The Lumbar Yard could be a cool name for a gym..or not, maybe a physical therapy place?
7
JeweledShootingStar 1 day ago +14
I worked in a large hospital p******* and it wasn’t uncommon to fill 2-3 95 gallon recycling bins a day of manufacturer medication bottles. The amount of plastic is INSANE and that was just the outpatient/discharge p*******.
14
staunch_character 1 day ago +12
I wish I could just return my empty pill bottles when I go to refill my prescriptions. It’s so wasteful.
12
cupittycakes 1 day ago +2
What do I do with them!? Why am I saving them?! Someone please advise.
2
IOl0I0lO 21 hr ago +2
I have 3 prescription meds I take every day. Sometimes the doc will do a 90-day Rx and I get one big bottle. But sometimes the doc forget and then I have to get the meds dispensed every 30 days and it’s 3 small bottles every month. I never found a way to recycle or return the bottles for reuse, so they all go in the trash.
2
Future-Side4440 1 day ago +9
Indeed, it is common now on livestock farms to wrap individual round hay bales with probably 20 square yards of white cling wrap, so the bale ferments in a sealed airtight container. Plus “silo bags” that are torn open in large fragments and discarded. Plus plastic bale tying twine and netting to hold the compacted bale together. Plus polytape electric fence that eventually wears out and is discarded. And single use plastic seed bags and chemical shipping containers. None of it can be reused and all will go straight to a landfill. This is far beyond the waste any single household would generate by themselves.
9
EuniceFear 1 day ago +6
I try to recycle every damn water bottle, etc. that I use. And then I drive past a single strawberry field that is covered with more plastic than I will use in my entire lifetime. I’ll keep trying - but what the f***…
6
caseyhconnor 1 day ago +8
Do you have a source? I'm unable to find an individual-vs-corporation breakdown, and I'm not sure how you would even generate one in a meaningful way. About 40% of plastic waste is from packaging, and something like another 25% of it is from consumer products (including textiles), so even though the "packaging" category includes a lot of corporate packaging you can't sweep individual usage under the rug. Agriculture supposedly is like 3.5%. I'm with you on the fraught nature of recycling policy, and we certainly shouldn't ignore corporate contribution to waste, but i think it's fair to prioritize individual habits, especially since they drive corporate behavior, and i don't think it's correct to say "we can recycle all we want it won't matter literally at all" - recycling isn't the real solution and it's rarely what it is presented to be, but i think the spirit of "blame the corporations and militaries instead of consumers" is much more applicable to energy usage/greenhouse gas emissions than plastic (although even there a big majority of emissions come from the production of consumer goods.)
8
GMGarry_Chess 22 hr ago +3
all of that is just to meet the public's demand
3
Pbpopcorn 1 day ago +35
This. I can recycle my entire life but it’s nothing to counteract the waste produced by Taylor Swift’s private jet for example
35
No-Aspect-5061 1 day ago +2
Corporate accountability……. the entire f****** planet and every living being would be better off if this was enforced.
2
awildjabroner 1 day ago +2
this is the core issue, the upstream producers create exponentially more amounts of evrything from plastic waste to carbon emmisions but no regulators have the stomach to do their job and address the issue other than throwing subsidies their way and blaming down stream individuals for system issues.
2
LA_Tiebreaker 1 day ago +2
As always, blame the peasants
2
Rich-Badger-7601 1 day ago +151
The actual issue isn't that recycling is bad or a waste of time, or that the general public was lied to about it, but rather the almost unfathomable degree to which the costs to produce single use plastics has fallen over the past 20 years as a result of increased oil extraction, particularly in the US. The composite materials to create it are a byproduct of the oil industry and produced in such massive quantities that they are basically free, with the result being that the economics of plastic recycling essentially died overnight.
151
spewing-oil 1 day ago +28
Right. By the time you collect, sort, wash, melt, pelletize plastics a lot of time and energy is spent. Even if the mechanical (melting) recycling plant was powered completely by green energy, it would be more profitable to just sell that energy to the grid. Especially with the looming new data centers.
28
hypersonic18 1 day ago +19
A significant portion of the plastic in the Ocean were believed to come from ships bound to and from China, most of recycled plastic was at the time shipped to China for recycling. It also shifted responsibility of product end of life to the consumer and help make adoption of plastics mainstream even though it has never even been a transparent service
19
SentientLight 1 day ago +11
Do you have a source? AFAIK, research into the pacific garbage patch shows most of the plastic in it comes from commercial fishing vessels and the lines and nets that get cut and just left out in the ocean when they tangle or snag.
11
hypersonic18 1 day ago +11
The main ones I've seen just say merchant ships but it does tie in that the number of fishing vessels have been stable so the growing waste likely comes from cargo ships, but it also acknowledges fishing vessels as a major source of nets https://phys.org/news/2019-09-ocean-plastic-ships.html
11
whatshamilton 1 day ago +76
People throwing their dirty coffee cup into the recycling and giving me a dirty look for throwing it in the trash — that particular plastic isn’t recyclable, even if it were it’s not when it’s dirty, and now you’ve tainted the whole batch. Your iced coffee cup is garbage, not recycling
76
lr99999 1 day ago +32
I had a next-door neighbor, married to a cop, put her dirty diapers into the recycling because they were paper.   Is it just my imagination, or are people really stupider than ever?
32
A_wild_so-and-so 1 day ago +7
Unfortunately people have always been this stupid.
7
incunabula001 1 day ago +102
It’s called Reduce, Reuse, Recycle for a reason. It should be followed in that order.
102
bendy5428 1 day ago +31
Yeah the recycling bins that garbage companies put out are, more often than I’d like, just green or blue trash cans and it all goes to the same hole in the ground. We as consumers can only do so much but when we rely on the systems above us to do their part we will be disappointed.
31
fionacielo 1 day ago +10
the illusion of choice
10
MultiGeometry 1 day ago +14
One of the selling points to the adoption of plastics was that it COULD be recycled. And the PR campaign kind of stopped there. I think that any firm that produces plastic should also be on the hook for funding facilities that process plastic recycling in the amount of 70% of what they produce. Companies who produce products made of 100% recycled plastics would be exempt.
14
AcheyTaterHeart 1 day ago +14
Plastic resins degrade during traditional mechanical recycling, and chemical recycling needs 90% virgin material to make a useful end product. Plastic recycling was always a sham.
14
Very_Human_42069 1 day ago +9
Everybody was so focused on the “Recycle” part and not the “Reduce, Reuse” part which is vastly more important. Things can be recycled, usually just once, then it ends up in a landfill anyway
9
sirbassist83 1 day ago +11
i think most people dont understand how badly theyve been propagandized to for the last half century or so. even if everyone, as individuals, perfectly sorted recycling from trash, most of the "recycling" ends up in chinese landfills anyways and industry creates so much pollution our efforts would barely make a dent, if it was a noticeable difference at all.
11
91Jammers 1 day ago +8
The consumer should not bear this burden. These items shouldnt exist. The consumer will adapt.
8
Green-Collection4444 1 day ago +4
I was at our local county recycling and transfer station last week. They are on the same property, but separated. I was dumping some old stuff from my basement at the transfer station at the end of the day when the county fork truck carrying a giant bail of plastic #2 from the recycling bay pulled in next to me and dumped the entire thing of plastic into the dump bin.... Straight to the landfill. That is when I realized that 100's of people's push to recycle and take the time to drive there and 'do the right thing' can completely stop with one lazy county employee in western NY.
4
Teadrunkest 1 day ago +5
I mean California (San Diego at least) used to sort recycling at the resident level so it’s not unfamiliar to at least a few counties in the state. Then we stopped for some reason. This was decades ago. I’ve always been flabbergasted on why we stopped.
5
Ordinaryundone 1 day ago +12
The basic gist is that most single-use plastics are made using byproducts of the petroleum industry that are already being produced in huge quantities. Using them costs basically nothing (you'd be surprised how many common products use oil as a base) and they aren't going to scale back oil production, so the effort and cost of recycling started to outpace it's actual net benefit. It's still a good practice but due to cost it's not being preformed on scale where it would actually make a difference. 
12
jelloslug 1 day ago +213
Post consumer plastic is so hard to recycle that it's actually worse for the environment to do so over just disposing of it in a landfill and making more. The real solution is to just not make so much plastic trash to begin with.
213
spewing-oil 1 day ago +65
Some plastic is easy to recycle (PET) and some is very hard (PVC). And that’s a major problem, the large amounts of different plastics that don’t play nice with each other. So sorting is a major requirement. Then there is the volume vs weight issue. I’ve seen styrofoam recycling being promoted.
65
CalicoWhiskerBandit 1 day ago +29
imo, not so much that it's hard... it's that it's harder to do it cheaper than new plastic. new plastic is basically a byproduct of the oil manuf process... they're basically giving away ethylene for free because if they dont get rid of it they have to pay to dispose of it how the hell are you going to convince people to wash their dishes when someone is offering to deliver new dishes to their door anytime they need them? gotta start incentivising recycling or penalizing oil/gas production.
29
MacrotonicWave 1 day ago +6
Some cities practically don’t want people recycling it feels. Around here if you want a recycling bin it’s an extra monthly bill. So the only folks that recycle from home are people willing to pay to do it
6
AcheyTaterHeart 1 day ago +10
Virgin PET still costs less than rPET
10
SomethingAboutUsers 1 day ago +65
Reduce, reuse, recycle. In that order.
65
dontgetaddicted 1 day ago +88
Also the fact that all of this save the planet stuff is always pushed down to the consumer. We're made to feel bad for existing in the world where we have no say on how items are packaged and distributed - yet corporations are free to pollute the environment elsewhere for profit. It's a hopeless cycle and consumers are expected to be the driving change. We're bailing water from a sinking ship with spoons. Most of us are tired of acting like it really makes any difference in the end.
88
makked 1 day ago +10
It’s a somewhat strange mentality though to think if it doesn’t make a difference, it’s no longer my responsibility to bother doing it. Some countries like Japan have pretty egregious single use plastic, but every household will clean and sort plastic. Culturally taboo not to. While their recycling is much more robust than the US, people also just do it because it’s the right thing to do. Like putting the shopping cart back.
10
A_wild_so-and-so 1 day ago +6
> because it’s the right thing to do. Eh... when you're talking about Japan, I think you had it right the first time: not doing so is taboo. Japan has a very collectivist culture. People are expected to fit in and toe the line, and not doing so is seen as a social faux pas. In some ways it's good, like everyone taking care in sorting trash and cleaning shared spaces. In other ways, it can stifle individuality and result in bullying. It's a mixed bag.
6
Gecko23 23 hr ago +3
You can’t have collectivism without bullying, there’s no reality where people always follow the rules simply because they are morally pure. Social pressure and consequences are what keep it functioning. I do know that Japanese culture has some dark corners that I don’t think most people would argue are acceptable for any reason, but there’s no social order that is benevolent and spontaneous on a large scale.
3
dpk794 1 day ago +2
I think it’s a strange mentality to go out of your way to do something that makes 0 difference. Why should I sort my plastic when they just dump it all in the same bin at the end of the day? Why should I buy an electric vehicle that will be an inconvenience for me in every way when there are people flying on jets every day to go sit in a meeting?
2
dontgetaddicted 1 day ago +4
I think it's less apathy and more exhaustion personally. Also, culturally we also have too much of a reliance on ones self and total lack of thought around doing better for the community - just because it makes the whole community better.
4
ReasonablyConfused 1 day ago +19
5% of plastic is actually recycled in America. Far less than 1% is recycled twice. It was never about actually recycling, it was about removing the public discomfort of consuming plastic.
19
colemon1991 1 day ago +18
Same issue with pollution in general. Fortune 500s contribute like 80% of all pollution but we are the ones that have to switch to fuel efficient cars and recycle and be considerate for the environment. If also doesn't help that plastic is c**** to produce and can only be recycled so many times.
18
Regular_Fox_859 1 day ago +10
And who are the ones buying the things companies make?
10
Daren_I 1 day ago +43
All this plastic waste seems far more of a problem than the waxy paper cups, glass bottles and paper sacks they replaced. I would go back to them in heartbeat.
43
ObsidianMarble 1 day ago +13
Glass is heavy increasing transportation costs. It also breaks easily and is a hazard when it does. Paper is not water proof or pest proof/resistant. Water or humidity can ruin a paper sack of sugar turning it into a hard lump. I had humidity turn a cardboard container of salt into a paper wrapped brick of salt (I stopped storing food there). There are benefits to traditional packaging materials, but plastic has a lot of benefits which is why it is dominant.
13
flareblitz91 19 hr ago +3
You're not wrong but I can't stand how people act as if we can't cut down massively on the amount we use. We got by without these materials for a very very long time. The fact that we treat our most permanent materials (environmentally) as disposable is a crime.
3
techleopard 1 day ago +8
Glass used for containers is indeed heavy, but it doesn't break easily at all. I have a bunch of old bottles and a house full of cats and they've never broken. I remember throwing old bottles at fences and trees as a kid, and it took a LOT of force just to chip them. Not like modern glass, which shatters into a billion microscopic pieces.
8
GreenFox1505 1 day ago +6
Virgin plastic materials are basically free. Most of the single use plastic we use comes from a byproduct of the natural gas industry. It doesn't make good fuel, they can't (legally) burn or dump it, and they certainly can't store it forever. So they give it away or even pay plastic producers to take it away. Recycling, on a level economic playing field, is competing with free (or even negitive cost). And if we subsidies it, then the natural gas industry would just end up paying more than the subsidity to get rid of it. Because they will still have to get rid of it somehow. Any solution to plastic recycling has to find away to decrease the source supply abundance.
6
meltedkuchikopi5 1 day ago +7
i think two things can happen (and should happen) in parallel with one another. 1. large corporations need to carry a higher burden and face more extreme consequences regarding plastics and negative environmental impacts. 2. consumers (in general, not necessarily you or anyone specifically) need to try shop/use companies that are sustainable when they can. shopping secondhand/consignment or using websites like the [good on you directory](https://directory.goodonyou.eco) are really helpful. when sustainable products make money, companies do respond because at the end of the day - their goal will always be to make money. unfortunately, rn we see a lot of influencers and the like still pushing their amazon storefronts (amazon products are usually impossible to chase the supply chain) and ive even seen some still push fashion nova, shein, etc. i’m not saying the responsibility is entirely on the consumer, it’s more recognizing that we are limited in what we can control. so we can control (ie what we buy), we should do what we can (some times we are limited, and that’s fine).
7
mn540 1 day ago +12
I can spend my whole life time trying to save the environment while Bozo, Musk, and Dump can destroy do more destruction in one afternoon on their yacht or personal airplanes.
12
Kinghero890 1 day ago +4
It was sent to china to be burned or thrown in their trash until china banned the import.
4
A_locomotive 1 day ago +9
I was one of those kids that bought into all the saving the planet stuff they pushed heavy in the 90s. Kept it going well into adulthood. When I found out all my years of careful cleaning and recycling was literally wasted time really contributed to the growing cynicism I have developed overtime. F*** every company that creates single use plastic.
9
Mieche78 1 day ago +3
Maybe someone can shed some light here, but what is stopping us from incinerating our trash a high temperatures like Japan does with their waste-to-energy programs? They also have extremely advanced fume filtration systems to ensure the releases gasses are not toxic. Seems to be better than whatever fake recycling programs we have here.
3
Square-Turnip-6558 1 day ago +5
Lobbying. Profit. The usual suspects.
5
Raz1979 1 day ago +2
Penn and Teller did an episode on Bullsh!t on recycling and I never looked at it the same way. I still recycle but I don’t kill myself doing it.
2
RedditPoster05 1 day ago +2
And somethings exist to serve customers yeah we could make laws that it’s where they manufacturer more stuff using less plastic but definitely is a two-way street
2
worstnameever2 1 day ago +283
Its incredible that if my child accidentally puts an empty can in our garbage container in two weeks or so ill get a letter from the county waste facility threatening to fine me for mismanagement but companies are allowed to wrap bulbs of garlic in non recyclable plastic wrap. 
283
--solitude-- 1 day ago +71
you nailed it. and the majority of that stuff we put in recycling never gets recycled. it’s got to be addressed at the producer end.
71
Zero_Waist 1 day ago +20
The petrochemical industry has been successfully marketing consumer responsibility for their products/pollution to counter (extended) producer responsibility (EPR) efforts for decades - now, they've just torpedoed California's efforts to hold them accountable. The article doesn't mention the cushy job given to the former CalRecycle director who helped them do so.
20
VoldemortsHorcrux 17 hr ago +11
As someone from Texas that first sentence sounds dystopia. I didnt even know that was happening. Texas is completely in the other direction though and is not good. Plastic bags are still used in almost every grocery store by everyone.
11
Snowbound35 1 day ago +267
The recycle bin is just where you throw the clean garbage
267
gashufferdude 1 day ago +76
I’m 95% sure this is the case in my rural town. And recycling cans, glass, and plastic has become such a hassle that the local guys closed and it’s 55 miles to the nearest center.
76
userpay 1 day ago +28
All the cans and bottles places closed down in my rural town. Used to be 4-5 now there's just the dump whose mandated by my county to maintain a can/bottle recycling program. I had talked to one of the places as it was winding down and one of the issues was it took to long to get the refund value from the state.
28
Snowbound35 1 day ago +33
Just to clarify, I do not put trash in the recycle bin, I'm attempting to hint at the fact that the recycling bin contents don't actually get recycled.
33
FatherDotComical 1 day ago +16
They did that when I was a child. Excited to make big recycling bin of soda cans for school and they just got dumped by the janitor into the regular trash at the end of the day. I asked about it and they said they didn't really have a recycling program.
16
NPVT 1 day ago +9
And often to the landfill that goes.
9
VikingButtsnGuts 1 day ago +30
I used to work at a sporting goods store and everything went in the trash compactor. Meanwhile I get fined a few bucks if the garbage man finds a plastic bottle in my garbage instead of recycling bin
30
try_again123 1 day ago +15
Individuals keep getting shamed by leadership with these inane policy while harmful data centers continue to get built over community concerns. We are done being the only ones being asked to be responsible.
15
PuddlesRex 1 day ago +197
1. Everyone's talking about plastic bags in the comments. The article makes almost no mention of single use plastic bags, which have been banned in California for months. 2. Companies are complaining about fees and fines. But they could just... I dunno, switch to non plastic containers, and then they don't have to pay the fine? Seems pretty straightforward to me. 3. This law does way too little. But at least it's a good step in the right direction.
197
HarmlessSnack 1 day ago +60
Haven’t single use plastic bags been banned for YEARS? Maybe that was in LA specifically, but back when I lived there in 2019 you had to bring reusable bags or buy them at the grocery store.
60
PuddlesRex 1 day ago +34
There was a loophole that allowed some stores to still give out single use plastic bags, that were "totally reusable, wink wink." This closed that loophole. It also bans retailers from selling single use plastic bags for a few cents per bag. Now requiring all retailers to only sell single use paper bags for a minimum charge of ten cents per bag.
34
chucksticks 22 hr ago +4
I really wished they build proper paper bags that don't rip and spill my groceries half the time or develop some kind of composite bag that disintegrates after a couple years into something safe.
4
Silver_Wolf_Dragon 1 day ago +5
And yet you can buy a thousand of them from amazon for $50
5
CalicoWhiskerBandit 1 day ago +10
1. bags are just part of the issue... straws, bottles, and packaging is bar far the bigger issue. you can manuf new items for basically free or buy recycled precursors for 1000% markip markip 2. switch to non plastic containers incurrs a cost, which would be passed onto consumers. this is a gripe by normal consumers mentioned in the article. there isnt anything blocking companies from just passing the cost (whether it be for the non-plastics or just passing the fines). that's why it's not straightforward, companies have a choice and consumers do not 3. this is the point of the article... the law does basically nothing. companies are pissed that a law was passed and consumers are pissed it has no teeth.
10
Regular_Fox_859 1 day ago +2
Then don't buy the stuff wrapped in plastic if it's both more expensive and a pollutant? That's the whole point of the law, to disincentevize the use of single use plastics by making them less economically competitive
2
nathanzoet91 1 day ago +3
2. Consumers have the choice to not buy those products
3
oldezzy 1 day ago +53
The recycling industry is a dog and pony show to make us feel better about killing the planet
53
AcheyTaterHeart 1 day ago +49
This is true for plastic recycling, but please keep recycling metals. Metal recycling works great, aluminum and steel have really high recovery rates.
49
Pinwheeling 1 day ago +7
Even for plastic recycling, it's highly dependent on your location. Recycling is a local form of sourcing materials, so every region is better or worse at recycling different things. In Georgia, plastic recycling is worthwhile because we have a carpet manufacturing industry that can source large amounts of recycled plastic for production. If you live in or near GA, please recycle plastic. On the other hand, GA doesn't do anything with glass, so often our recycling won't even take it. You're spot on for metal. It's pretty universal that everyone should recycle metals.
7
Square-Turnip-6558 1 day ago +14
I’m pretty sure my state turns glass back into sand, too
14
Reasonable_Ticket_84 1 day ago +9
Glass recycling is extremely difficult. Even grinding it back down to sand is very energy intensive but often the "last resort" as there is nothing else that can be done with it. The best glass recycling is the systems of Europe where glass beer bottles are taken back and inspected by machine for defects and then industrially washed to be reused.
9
Square-Turnip-6558 1 day ago +5
Our #1 export where I live is sand, so idk I assume that’s why they do it here.
5
HammerOfAres 1 day ago +3
Glass itself is actually potentially 100 percent recycleable, the challenge is always what people put into the glass which becomes the issue. Contaminants greatly hinder the recycling process.
3
Accomplished-Use213 1 day ago +14
Ban PJs first, ban stuff that effects the least amount of people first. Private Jets aren't needed.
14
Kitakitakita 1 day ago +6
Recycling doesn't work if the responsibility falls on the citizen
6
The_Mad_Tinkerer 23 hr ago +5
Im not outraged. I dont know anyone who is outraged. I know one person who is annoyed and many people who fell put out.
5
SummitYourSister 1 day ago +23
I had a friend who worked at a municipal recycle plant for many years. After hearing him describe everything, I stopped recycling stuff and just throw everything into the garbage now. I also try to buy things in metal containers when possible but that’s only if the choice is easy.
23
bullmooooose 1 day ago +11
This really depends on where you are. Aluminum recycling rates are usually pretty good since aluminum is valuable and it’s also infinitely recyclable, also the machinery to pick cans out of the mixed stream is decent since there a uniform size/shape. So I always make an effort to put the cans in the bin.  Plastic recycling is f****** greenwashed nonsense so yeah I’ll do it but I don’t expect it to go anywhere except the landfill. 
11
RawMeatAndColdTruth 1 day ago +8
Takes a huge amount of electricity to refine aluminum as well. Definitely worth it to recycle cans. 
8
ActionJasckon 1 day ago +5
While Starbucks guy takes his private jet from Newport Beach to SB HQ… weekly.
5
Klutzy_Leave_1797 17 hr ago +5
No single-use plastic bags on Oahu. Just moved here. You get used to it.
5
Lopsided-Total-5560 1 day ago +15
I never have understood why we don’t use glass and aluminum more. A few companies now make aluminum bottles with screw on lids. 100% recyclable. I remember recycling glass bottles as a kid. I also remember the local brewery (in Germany) using all flip tops and the beer delivery man would pick up the empties when he dropped off the new case. They would steam them out, put on a new rubber gasket and refill them. I remember some of the bottles looking like they were 100 years old. People are going to have to change and adapt or we’re doomed.
15
7heprofessor 1 day ago +18
Money. Plastic is ridiculously c****, and incredibly strong for said cost.
18
MsSelphine 1 day ago +4
It really is the tragedy of plastic. Its a goddamn wonder material, and it's so c**** that it's wonderous properties make it a cancer.
4
wilbz 1 day ago +12
1. Weight. Plastic is incredibly light for it's relative strength. You have to ship a lot more weight if you're switching to glass (and a lesser degree aluminum). Shipping those containers adds a lot of cost and GHG due to the additional weight of the packaging. 2. Cost. Most plastic feed stocks (especially for polypropylene and polyethylene) are waste byproducts of fuel refining so their general cost on a $/lb basis is much lower than glass / aluminum. There's a lot less energy required to process them as well. Both of the above are only true at the supplier level (single use source generator). Certainly if everyone switched to reusables for all of their consumables then the above facts are no longer true, but they require some pretty big changes in consumer behavior.
12
Lopsided-Total-5560 1 day ago +3
I agree with the weight issue with the glass. I have to disagree with the aluminum. I’m not talking about an aluminum refillable water bottle that you’re going to use for years, I’m talking about the ones in the cold case competing with the plastic packaged water. They are surprisingly light and probably only one step from aluminum foil. I buy them when they’re available and they are good for a couple of refills before being dented/crinkled beyond use. Aluminum is one of the easiest recycled materials that we commonly use.
3
robogobo 1 day ago +9
It’s almost as if Reagan era deregulation had nothing but negative consequences for the people. No trickle down whatsoever.
9
Elemure 1 day ago +9
About 5 billion prescriptions were filled in the United States in 2025 - the majority requiring pill bottles. Often the size of the bottle relative to the quantity of pills is ridiculously disproportionate. I wonder how many plastic straws could be made from one pill bottle? Perhaps the pharmacuetical industry is exempt though.
9
MsSelphine 1 day ago +3
The only alternative material is metal, like aluminum, and it likely still would not work as well. plastic is ostensibly one of the best materials for pill bottles, both is cost and function. They must be durable, lightweight, airtight, nonreactive, and mass-producable. Solving single use plastic in the medical industry is a much tougher problem then telling grocery stores to use paper. 
3
wtfrman 1 day ago +9
Me sorting plastics, glass, food waste and separating things.  Corporations, "just throw all of that into the dumpster"
9
Roxapotamus 23 hr ago +5
Trader Joe’s beloved by so many liberal hippy douches (I’m kinda one of them) has so many single serving ridiculous plastic packaging foods I’m ashamed to shop there.
5
DDeadRoses 1 day ago +6
This is why we need more homeless people. They recycle!
6
Opening_Classroom_46 1 day ago +12
So like, plastic is a real problem. But literally every single time we try to do anything about it, everyone says it's the wrong way. Can they start telling us what the right way is? How do we fix this problem? Because just chanting "no" over and over isn't doing it.
12
transientdude 1 day ago +7
Because the right way requires real cost and change of system. I have lived places where there were stores you could go to and fill a jar with flour, or lentils, or powdered dish detergent and you paid by weight. It was great and cost about the same as if I bought those at a local big box. But big box runs this show and they have no interest in changing the whole way they do things. This method also requires an amount of civic responsibility to 1) not steal/lie and 2) not let your child dump things on the ground. This responsibility is not present at the moment, generally speaking. There are clear paths forward that require the slightest bit of planning and initial outlay of cost that will save in the long run, but American capitalism is not currently built for delayed gratification.
7
birbbbbbbbbbbb 1 day ago +6
People have already said the right way over and over and over again, avoid using plastics when you can. I've met people who do this (they get a lot of their produce locally, when they need to get something in plastic they'll buy in bulk, they eat foods that are more environmentally friendly, they also just buy less in general). The thing is they had to actually give up some thing to live like this and most people want to have their cake and eat it too so they just ignore it.
6
TheBSQ 1 day ago +3
This is a problem with so many things. “We just don’t like the process” or “we felt excluded from the process” or “I can imagine a fantastical alternative that doesn’t have the same downsides (that isn’t actually possible to do in the real World” are super common barriers to getting things done, and they’re real barriers because we made it much easier to block & obstruct stuff about 50 years ago cuz people hated it when govt could just do what it wanted (like raze a neighborhood to build a highway).  There really is no “right way” that *everyone* will agree on & no one will try to undermine.  It’s a bit part of why we struggle to fix our problems. You kinda need a benevolent dictator to force “imperfect but good enough & better than now” policies on the masses. But that’s not happening either. 
3
lowbatteries 1 day ago +7
"everyone" being corporations, not people
7
TheBSQ 1 day ago +5
It’s emotionally comforting to think we can just blame “bad corporations” but plenty of actual real-life people hate it too cuz they find it annoying or burdensome.
5
Opening_Classroom_46 1 day ago +4
there are real people in this thread saying the law is bad. I'm just wondering why no one ever gives their opinion on what's the right way.
4
calisnark 1 day ago +10
I resent the term Single Use Plastic when they always show a shopping bag. I reused every bag for trash, or picking up doggie poop. I can't remember ever throwing away a plastic bag that was empty. I bet most of us used those bags a second time too?
10
RueTabegga 1 day ago +6
Recycling was a psyop by big manufacturers to place the blame of waste plastics on consumers.
6
FirstLaughOfTheDay 1 day ago +3
Little Lisa Recycling Plant lied to us?!
3
sjm294 1 day ago +3
In 2021 Maine passed a law to eliminate most plastic carry out bags. People adapt…
3
BWWFC 1 day ago +3
a first *^(of many)* rule of capitalism: we do not fk with the ppl's convenience$!
3
Altruistic_Bird2532 1 day ago +3
Just saw this interesting and very entertaining video on recycling: [I’m pretty sure recycling isn’t real](https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=68zjxTTl5Ik)
3
Monguises 10 hr ago +2
Can we sell California to the highest bidder? I’m sick to death of California making me look stupid to the rest of the world.
2
edgarecayce 1 day ago +7
Here’s the solution. Make the producers of plastic packaging or single use plastic be responsible for its disposal.
7
tesulalu 23 hr ago +6
I’m in Europe right now. Recycling is easy and even profitable for everyday people. Get yo shit together usa.
6
onetwentyeight 23 hr ago +5
Who is actually annoyed by this? I've got no qualms by being mildly inconvenienced at worst.
5
door_of_doom 22 hr ago +2
"Outrage" is a pretty comical characterization. One side think it does too much, the other side thinks it does too little. Almost as if it's a compromise or something like that, but I'm not sure anyone knows what that word means anymore.
2
j2yan 22 hr ago +2
As an owner of 2 cats I hate it because they were perfect for cleaning out the litter box!
2
the-software-man 21 hr ago +2
Control your waste! Any effort helps. Just any effort x 36 million people will help.
2
freetimerva 9 hr ago +2
Big oil really has a strangle hold on our society. It’s crazy when you go somewhere without widespread single use plastic and you just stop thinking about it. My fruit doesn’t need to be hermetically sealed with dangerous gases blown all over it. It’s an apple. It’s wrapped in natural plastic called skin.
2
Bored-Corvid 9 hr ago +2
This is something I have legit arguments with my mother about. Their house is a f****** disgusting mess because my mother is so obsessed with recycling and "doing what she can for the environment".
2
ShdwWzrdMnyGngg 1 day ago +5
Leaded gas was also super convenient. I don't think people realize how bad micro plastics are. Like it's absolutely as bad as leaded gas and radiation. Be happy for any change your State makes on plastic. Very very bad stuff.
5
Charlie2and4 1 day ago +4
Why did we ever decided to use one-use paper bags while the rest of civilization reused baskets and boxes since the time of baskets and boxes?
4
lokiswolf 1 day ago +2
Don’t even mind paper bags. We, as a society, regularly recycled paper bags. They became compost, book covers, wrapping paper, hats, costumes, lunch bags and the list goes on. A truly renewable resource because we could grow more. Now we get not even one use plastic bags that aren’t good for anything, or you buy your own totes and feed the commercial 3rd world slavery that those totes come from.
2
← Back to Board