· 157 comments · Save ·
For Sale Apr 22, 2026 at 5:38 AM

Sydney Sweeney cut from Devil Wears Prada 2 following MAGA backlash, with insiders stating it was a 'creative decision'

Posted by IrishStarUS

Sydney Sweeney cut from Devil Wears Prada 2 following MAGA backlash
Irish Star
Sydney Sweeney cut from Devil Wears Prada 2 following MAGA backlash
Sydney Sweeney's cameo in the highly-anticipated Devil Wears Prada 2 has reportedly been cut, with insiders citing a 'creative decision' after she was spotted on set
🚩 Report this post

157 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
jl_theprofessor 3 days ago +838
I like how the article says the decision had nothing to do with her politics but then they spend half an article hypothesizing how it could have been about politics.
838
rgumai 3 days ago +135
Ah yes, the Irish Star article posted by Irish Star that does nothing but speculate.
135
jl_theprofessor 3 days ago +38
lol holy shit I didn't even see who posted this.
38
bluerose297 3 days ago +79
Gotta get dem clicks
79
Saul_T_Bauls 3 days ago +10
These trash sites "write" like by geriatric parents speak. In rambling circles.
10
LuinAelin 3 days ago +24
Typical internet click bait
24
altcntrl 3 days ago +12
Irish Star had been consistently showing what bad journalism looks like for a few months and maybe longer before that. I only saw them recently and it’s all for clicks.
12
SoftwareAny4990 3 days ago +4
The Irish Star is listed as a tabloid site.
4
Original_Staff_4961 3 days ago +6
It’s a tabloid. It’s got nothing to to with politics, they’re just hoping you click the link
6
GoldenTicketHolder 3 days ago +10
Happy 2026, nothing portrayed as news actually is- just opinions everywhere
10
Mother-Event-3159 3 days ago +6
fact based journalism has been long dead. specially after 24 hour news and constant hunger of social media
6
the_real_mac-t 3 days ago +5
Tabloids have always been like this. Let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater. It's bad for the baby.
5
GoldenTicketHolder 3 days ago +3
Not at all correct, in the U.S., the fairness doctrine was repealed in 1978 by Reagan, which repealed laws requiring news to make a good faith effort to be unbiased. It was around since 1949
3
the_real_mac-t 3 days ago +3
That's not what the fairness doctrine was about. And even if it was, it only applied to broadcast media, not newspapers and magazines (and wouldn't have been applicable to the internet either). Please do your research when you post things like that. Serious media organizations are still bound by ethics rules and guidelines. Reuters. AP. Times. The Guardian. NYT. WSJ. Bloomberg. BBC. When such organizations report, they have to base it on facts. And yes, those organizations also publish opinions. Those are clearly marked as opinions. Is there bias on the reporting? Sure. It's done by people, after all. But when you see the same reports coming from both a left-wing paper (let's say Guardian) and a right-wing one (The Times), you get a better idea of where the middle ground might be.
3
SantaFeRay 3 days ago +2
That’s a little naive.
2
SirBobPeel 2 days ago +2
Other than being a registered Republican, has she ever said a single thing about MAGA or Trump? Or is this just based on a tv commercial for jeans?
2
spazz720 3 days ago +1
It 100% had nothing to do with her politics…she just starred in a film that was #1 at the box office
1
ndro777 3 days ago +1604
It never makes sense why she's cast there, especially the role is as herself.
1604
FuelForYourFire 3 days ago +233
>She was, however, expected to portray herself as a celebrity client working alongside Emily Charlton (Emily Blunt), another one of Miranda's former assistants. This comes as fans have labeled Sydney's hit show a 'disaster.' Doesn't mean it makes sense, but there's this.
233
iceburg47 3 days ago +163
I misread assistant as assassin and was suddenly way more interested in the movie for just a moment. But seriously, can we get a comedy where Emily Blunt and Anne Hathaway are assassins for the fashion industry? "Who do you think you are? The fashion police?" "Not exactly..." Pew pew
163
FuelForYourFire 3 days ago +105
Assassin's Tweed?
105
staebles 3 days ago +10
And *bow...*
10
Mikestopheles 3 days ago +30
Nothing is blue, everything is weft knitted.
30
jcomey 3 days ago +15
Pretty sure one of your upvotes was Amazon greenlighting this for ten episodes.
15
FriedRamen13 3 days ago +16
The third movie in a Zoolander Trilogy: Mugatu’s Revenge
16
Paran0idAndr0id 3 days ago +6
If there's Fashion Police, that implies that there's also a Fashion SWAT right?
6
punktualPorcupine 3 days ago +3
Yep. Make that instead. I would watch that.
3
adidas198 3 days ago +9
So Euphoria her hit show?
9
livinginfutureworld 3 days ago +369
Is she the devil? I'm not familiar with this series.
369
Less_Likely 3 days ago +200
Only if she’s wearing Prada, I believe. Not familiar either.
200
VidE27 3 days ago +98
I think Chanel or Hugo Boss would be a better brand for the devil
98
cobaltjacket 3 days ago +18
The Devil is an equal opportunity hater. Racism is a product of man.
18
Then-Importance-3808 3 days ago +13
The ants would like a word
13
baneofthesouth 3 days ago +2
I needed this laugh
2
ghost-nug 3 days ago +13
The devil wears nada
13
PM_ME_YOUR__VAGINAS 3 days ago +8
I've seen that one
8
disaar 3 days ago +7
This is the adult film. 🎞️
7
Covetous1 3 days ago +13
Is this like Silence of the Lambs?
13
europorn 3 days ago +15
Yes. She wears a pantsuit made from the skin of her victims.
15
zubairhamed 3 days ago +4
prada makes Canadian Tuxedos?
4
blunderwonder35 3 days ago +5
The devil doesn't shop at walmart? Here I thought he was the practical sort.
5
TheDogWhoCantSTFU 3 days ago +4
Doesn't mean he wants to get shanked
4
BrahneRazaAlexandros 3 days ago +2
Anna Wintour is the titular devil.
2
MA2_Robinson 2 days ago +4
If she was cast as smeagle in the prequel I wouldn’t even be mad.
4
nahweha 3 days ago +36
It never makes sense her in any cast
36
Accomplished-Fly4678 3 days ago +37
She’s perfect in euphoria, her only role is to have big badonks
37
Tricky-Engineering59 3 days ago +19
That girl is her own costar in everything she’s in. And she gets second billing to boot.
19
GroundbreakingPage41 3 days ago +1
Again they’re not even that big
1
Accomplished-Fly4678 3 days ago +17
Idk I’m gay
17
MA2_Robinson 2 days ago +3
I mean you want an unbiased opinion, you ask a gay opinion
3
fredjutsu 3 days ago +6
lol bro come on.
6
AweHellYo 3 days ago +5
yeah let’s be serious. i’m tired of her but them things are crazy
5
benkatejackwin 3 days ago +6
It never ages well to have a current celebrity as themself in a movie. I'm thinking of Ed Sheeran being cast as a song writer on par with the Beatles in *Yesterday*.
6
ElliottP1707 3 days ago +300
Cameos get cut from films all the time. I doubt it’s anything that deep
300
ucankickrocks 3 days ago +140
She’s not a particularly “fashionable” celebrity.
140
lsb1027 3 days ago +61
Yeah, what was she even doing there? It should have been zendaya for example
61
god_peepee 3 days ago +2
Zendaya Coleman?
2
AlChiberto 3 days ago +12
Zendaya Holland
12
HateYourFaces 3 days ago +6
He took her last name, so it’s Mr and Mrs Zendaya.
6
akam80thesquirrel 3 days ago +2
Are they actually married or am I being gaslit by the internet again
2
Morphray 3 days ago +9
Hollywood's buxom blonde du jour rarely gets recognized as "fashionable", rather relying on aspects that rarely go out of fashion.
9
BrahneRazaAlexandros 3 days ago +7
Some people got really upset that Ana De Armas was cut from Yesterday. But it is a bit more understandable because they put her in the trailer.
7
a_tired_bisexual 3 days ago +19
N-SYNC got cut from the Star Wars prequels
19
zimkazimka 3 days ago +5
And now you see how it ended up...
5
ConkerPrime 3 days ago +141
Based on description of scene, sounded like an easy cut for time. The movie is 2 hours long as it is. People reading way too much into it.
141
SoftwareAny4990 3 days ago +15
This site posts a lot. Its a tabloid site.
15
thatlad 3 days ago +26
2+ hour movies are a plague. 95-105 mins is the sweet spot unless it's a tentpole
26
Ptolemeirios 3 days ago +24
2 hour films are perfect when they are done right. Problem is too many films waste time for no reason.
24
Tuesday_Night_Club 3 days ago +14
God I miss 90 minute movies. The extra time doesn't make it extra good. So many useless scenes.
14
RealDJPrism 3 days ago +44
Nothing says reliable source like when 10 ads pop up on the screen when you visit their website
44
aussiemetalhead 3 days ago +136
"Sydney, you need to stay clothed for this"... "I'm out"
136
NinetiesNoughties 3 days ago +7
I find it funny that even in a movie where she’s playing a nun, they still somehow managed to give her a wet t shirt scene. 
7
FortunateInsanity 3 days ago +15
After all, her b**** have their own SAG card.
15
_Monosyllabic_ 2 days ago +5
They should they're doing at least 75% of her job.
5
Disused_Yeti 3 days ago +19
She’s in trouble if they started to SAG already
19
Tylerdurden389 3 days ago +2
At that size, itll be sooner than later.
2
Good-Salad-9911 3 days ago +7
Not that listnookors ever f****** care, but it isn’t about Trump. Learn what is a legit news source and what is bullshit, people. [https://ew.com/syndey-sweeney-cameo-cut-devil-wears-prada-2-11954299](https://ew.com/syndey-sweeney-cameo-cut-devil-wears-prada-2-11954299) The Irish Star is on par with those alienzines: [https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/irish-star-bias-and-credibility/](https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/irish-star-bias-and-credibility/)
7
Oceanbreeze871 3 days ago +113
She’s so overrated
113
CommunicationTime265 3 days ago +7
I've never seen anything she's in except for Once Upon A Time In Hollywood
7
Weirmon1 2 days ago +3
She’s in once upon a time in Hollywood?? I’ve watched it multiple times and never noticed
3
CommunicationTime265 2 days ago +3
She doesn't have a big part. She's one of the weird cult girls.
3
justarandomuser20 3 days ago +20
I’m still trying to figure out what makes her and the housemaid click for casual movie goers. It’s genuinely dumbfounding
20
CptSporran 3 days ago +30
The housemaid was a pretty successful novel. Folk who enjoyed the book will have just wanted to see the film regardless, probably.
30
unicornsmaybetuff 3 days ago +32
I liked The Housemaid, but it was because of Amanda Seyfried.
32
legopieface 3 days ago +49
The three B’s B**** blonde and basic
49
fredjutsu 3 days ago +9
that's a dime a dozen in hollywood. it's the 'always naked' part that keeps em coming.
9
burritocmdr 3 days ago +8
I chuckled watching this movie because there were, I think 3 sex scenes in there, and then it became clear why this movie was made. I can just imagine the negotiations going on behind the scenes "Let's get Sweeney in on this... I want 3 sex scenes, how much to get her fully n***? Can we get full frontal? We need at least 5 seconds of exposed nips..."
8
wellarmedsheep 3 days ago +5
Giant t***. It's not confusing
5
theoriginalshabang1 3 days ago +8
I liked the books & Frieda McFadden (the author) in general. In reading these books over years- never, not once, ever, did I imagine Sidney Sweeney as the main character. Ever.
8
fredjutsu 3 days ago +8
She's attractive, openly sexual, natural blonde blue eyed, has big b****, getting naked seems to be in her contract. it's really not that complicated
8
ItsOozingOut 3 days ago +2
By attractive in that “my mom and dad are brother and sister” kind of a way? Then sure, yeah she’s attractive.
2
Tylerdurden389 3 days ago +2
Every 3-5 years there's a new girl that gets pushed all over the mainstream until she turns 28 and then gets forgotten about overnight in order to make room for the next one. Rinse, repeat.
2
Cassanitiaj 3 days ago +4
She’s a bad actress. Only famous because of the way she looks. If I were her I wouldn’t rock the boat by courting controversial political positions since she’s not exactly getting by on her acting abilities.
4
MagePrincess 3 days ago +35
Personally, i like this decision
35
Chazprime 3 days ago +5
More clickbait trash from the Irish Star I see.
5
Arlennx 3 days ago +3
Less Maga supporters in media the better.
3
DejongBCN 2 days ago +3
Not sure what this lady adds to this movie other than b****. B**** can be added for much less money. 
3
Cjgraham3589 3 days ago +41
Incredibly mediocre actress anyway, so fine by me.
41
FinallyFat 3 days ago +19
She’s from Spokane. Excepting anything from her will lead to a disappointment. You can downvote all you want, but Spokane is well… Spokane. 🤷‍♂️
19
easyantic 3 days ago +9
Having grown up there in the 80’s, that’s accurate. But these days, Spokane isn’t quite as Spokane-y. That whole rural area is still…northern Idaho adjacent, though.
9
Equivalent-Shine5742 3 days ago +5
Spokane is the Akron of the PNW!
5
Unique-Run9856 3 days ago +3
Spokane is the Dundalk of the west 
3
fredjutsu 3 days ago +3
I've never been to Spokane, so you'll need to elaborate for us
3
King_SalineIV 3 days ago +3
I heard from the Penny-Arcade guys probably 20 years ago that the chief export of Spokane is human souls fleeing that godforsaken landfill of a town and I’ve always remembered that.
3
griffshan 3 days ago +41
Tired of people pretending she isn’t a terrible actress. She has zero range, is n*** in 95% of every project she does and should not be as famous as she is.
41
cmrndzpm 3 days ago +5
She was quite good as Cassie in season two of Euphoria but that’s literally the only thing I’ve seen her shine at, and it was mostly just a lot of crying and emotional outbursts. Other than that she always seems so, vacant?
5
fredjutsu 3 days ago +2
nobody likes her for her acting chops, dude
2
Unique-Run9856 3 days ago +7
Have you seen her b**** though 
7
Equivalent-Shine5742 3 days ago +16
Haven't we all?
16
Acuallyizadern93 3 days ago +7
I’m sick of hearing about her. She seems like a dead-eyed whisper actor who relies on sultry-ness and sex scenes. If she’s even slightly on the right wing, in this political climate, she can f*** all the way off.
7
Hobotronacus 3 days ago +5
I don't think their outrage will matter here, maga were never the target audience for this type of movie anyway.
5
SauceHankRedemption 3 days ago +7
How did Sydney Sweeney become such a political controversy? Is it literally all stemming from that jeans add she did?
7
ManufacturedOlympus 3 days ago +3
Mah JHEENZ IZ good 
3
Sharp-Tax-26827 3 days ago +26
If she was a B cup no one would know her name
26
Chicken_and_a_fan 3 days ago +13
The hate boner some people have for her is excessive.
13
I_Am_Ironman_AMA 3 days ago +6
All based on a simple jeans ad that got bizarrely dragged into the maga-sphere.
6
rensorship 3 days ago +4
I only know her from her b****, what does she do?
4
timberwolf0122 2 days ago +3
She does b**** and ignorance apparently
3
DankousKhan 2 days ago +3
She does a pretty solid Sid from Ice Age impression too!
3
unTraditional_Fox419 3 days ago +5
Maybe because she can’t act for shit?
5
patriot2024 3 days ago +5
If anything Gisele should appear as herself, again.
5
Development-Feisty 3 days ago +8
She wasn’t playing herself, she was playing someone who worked at runway Gisele I mean
8
ForsakenRelief309 3 days ago +2
Not a bad idea
2
Gammarayz25 3 days ago +2
"...following MAGA backlash." Correlation does not equal causation. Such a misleading headline, total dog shit article. You can use the same phrase 20 years from now, and it would still technically be true.
2
JudasIsCarHot 2 days ago +2
The film has already finished shooting and is in post production. This is old news.
2
Lazy-Ad-1740 2 days ago +2
“Creative Decision” = no box office poision #CINEMAWINS
2
xzmile 2 days ago +2
She's trashy, no class, she would stick out like a sore thumb in that movie.
2
Absolutely_Not2028 2 days ago +2
Seriously. I watched the first two episodes of the newest season and I can truly say from the truest bottom of my heart.....she is so mid. I tried so hard to be objective. But her face is just not it
2
Queasy-Protection-50 1 day ago +2
Guess that’s what happens when you give answers to reporters that reveal you are a worthless, pick me, MAGA-coded racist 🤷‍♀️
2
fitnessCTanesthesia 3 days ago +7
Well she doesn’t belong there tainting the real talent in the film.
7
APartyInMyPants 3 days ago +5
People are turning this into nothing. It is a cameo. Cuts for time are a thing.
5
SmarmyYardarm 3 days ago +3
Even good parts of Great movies are cut for time. This is not news.
3
Craig1974 3 days ago +4
🙄 I would want to be cut from it too. Rehashed garbage from Hollywood.
4
kevinsixhohsix 3 days ago +5
She's not even a reputable actress. She shows off those titties and all the boys be drooling. Let's see her display some actual f****** acting chops. Do you really think this woman has what it takes to stand toe to toe with someone like Garbo? Bette Davis? Gloria Grahame? Come on. She's barely in the same league as Pamela Anderson. In fact I could see Sweeney doing a prequel to Barb Wire in the near future. You know when her career starts to tank. I wish folks would stop giving these "actors" so much attention.
5
Nameless_Ghoul1891 3 days ago +4
Every time I see a picture of them woman she always looks like she needs a good night sleep.
4
poopantiess 3 days ago +10
Sydney MAGA Sweeney
10
swrrrrg 3 days ago +3
The hate this woman gets is excessive and unbelievable. Some of you need to go outside once in a while.
3
SantaFeRay 3 days ago +2
> she referenced having "good jeans," intended as a double meaning for the phrase "good genes" in relation to her blonde hair and blue eyes. Wait people interpreted that as being about her hair and eyes? I really don’t think that’s what they were going for.
2
MistahBisskits 3 days ago +2
We are only a few months from every maga celebrity pretending they were never maga.
2
SirBobPeel 2 days ago +2
Did she ever pretend she WAS maga?
2
the_Wallie 3 days ago +3
Good. F*** her and her good jeans 
3
mrpickles 3 days ago +3
What are they mad about this time?
3
Amoeba-Shteve 3 days ago +2
Can’t stand her in anything. Don’t know why she gets any work at all. 💩
2
Scaredysquirrel 2 days ago +2
Can she now be removed from the Gundam movie? Tomino cannot be vibing with that choice.
2
Psychological-Act-85 3 days ago +2
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
2
EeBeBe 3 days ago +2
Tired of her and her naked dresses and flashing breasts anyway.
2
gummi_eater 3 days ago +6
Are you my conservative mother??
6
drawmer 3 days ago +1
“I did it because I love the brand and I love the jeans” Okay.
1
Muddled_Opinions 3 days ago -2
No worries, she'll probably do a movie with Kid Rock.
-2
Jazzlike-Vacation230 3 days ago +1
GOOD. Do Gundam next.
1
Spare-Ant7119 3 days ago +1
Does Sydney support Trump or not?
1
Gawdiscool 3 days ago +1
We got all eyes you know? lol can’t say it’s something while the actions/patterns result differently.
1
Gmarlon123 3 days ago +1
Funny thing is I’m sure Miranda’s Politics skew conservative- socially liberal everything else conservative. She would never send her kids to public school no matter how good.
1
VirginiaLuthier 2 days ago +1
There's actually only two things I like about her
1
notthatgeorge 1 day ago +1
People need to stop assuming actors aren't cut out of things all the time and always have been
1
Much-Instruction-807 1 day ago +1
May she have the day she voted for.
1
Gbjeff 7 hr ago +1
Did The Devil Wears Prada require a n*** scene? If not, then why else would she be cast? She can’t act.
1
← Back to Board