Reuters need to do better with their titles. The article and title do not match. The sale of alcohol is not prohibited in Damascus, it's constrained to three predominantly christian neighborhoods in the city.
A better title would be that Syrian authorities heavily restricts sale of alcohol in Damascus, which I have seen other outlets use.
467
Spudtron98Mar 18, 2026
+113
Oh, so it's old-school rules. The old kingdoms used to grant brewing rights to Christian monasteries with the understanding that their alcohol would only be used for Christian purposes... but naturally they sold it under the table anyway because it was a major funding source for the institutions, and frequently to Muslims willing to look the other way.
113
LateStarMar 18, 2026
+77
I visited Damaskus before the war, and the only bars serving alcohol back then where in those neighbourhoods too. Plus, I remember one ”international” hotel in Aleppo that would serve you a beer in the lobby. Much has changed, yet some remain the same.
77
Local_Fly_7359Mar 18, 2026
+13
Different laws and rules for different religions. There is no way this will backfire! /s
13
Beetlelarva25Mar 18, 2026
-5
How to create a black market 101, are the Syrians too stupid to know what taxes are?
-5
FriendoftheDorkMar 18, 2026
-55
"Heavily restricts sale of alcohol"
So, like Norway and Sweden?
-55
bellerinhoMar 18, 2026
+58
It's not particularly close to Norway and Sweden lol
Norway has state controlled restrictions on alcohol sales, but you can get it in any town and at bars
58
FriendoftheDorkMar 18, 2026
-29
Fair, but it is restricted compares to most European countries.
Somehow I forgot bars exist 😅
-29
Drunk_Moron_Mar 19, 2026
+8
This is how Damascus has pretty much always been. Alcohol has only been publicly sold In predominantly Christian areas. Now it’s just on paper, not really a big change
8
Suchisthe007lifeMar 18, 2026
+205
Religious Laws (beliefs) and State’s Laws should never intersect.
205
thomasrat1Mar 18, 2026
+32
To be fair, if we made descions purely based on what is logically.
Alcohol would have been banned a long time ago
32
andydude44Mar 18, 2026
+26
Logically we would have legalized all drugs, because prohibition only creates a black market since it doesn’t decrease demand significantly.
26
DroptossMar 18, 2026
+10
I used to hold this view too but modern drugs like fent are so dangerous.
10
ahfooMar 20, 2026
+2
So because of this you have decided that prohibition works? That's f****** insane.
2
andydude44Mar 20, 2026
+1
Fent exists as a drug/contamination because it’s so much easier to hide in shipping under prohibition, and lack of regulation/testing. Legalization would help regarding fent and its ODs.
1
WwwgooglecoMar 20, 2026
+1
By that logic, weapons and literally anything sold illegally should be legalized
1
andydude44Mar 20, 2026
+1
Weapons should be legal and regulated, just like drugs and whores. Obviously those that use or sell all three should be shamed for doing so just like cigarette companies/smokers, but prohibition causes worse outcomes than legalization and regulation
1
WwwgooglecoMar 20, 2026
+1
you share a very unpopular opinion among syrians
1
VeganKiwiGuyMar 20, 2026
+1
Except Muslim countries seem to consistently have lower rates of alcohol consumption due to both cultural norms along with legal prohibition.
If anything Muslim countries are doing right, in terms of overall health of their populace, it’s the reduced levels of alcohol consumption.
You want to criticize Muslim countries, critique cigarette smoking, hookah lounges, and the sale of other drugs outside alcohol, at least compared to the West.
1
Visible-Might-2527Mar 18, 2026
It does work when the punishment is actually strong enough.
0
lollythepop7Mar 18, 2026
+23
Not when elected representatives choose laws because of popular support
23
PoliticsboringagainMar 18, 2026
+10
Don't worry, if they fund Christian get their way in the US, it will happen everywhere here too.
Religious hate that other people can do the things their religion says they can't.
10
someone1611Mar 19, 2026
+1
Alcohol poses a threat even to people who don’t drink. Drinking alcohol shouldn’t be considered a personal liberty because it poses a danger to others through drunk driving and causing unruly behavior.
1
The_Munchies10Mar 18, 2026
-162
Agreed. We don’t want secularism.
-162
Appropriate_Unit3474Mar 18, 2026
+60
That would actually be secularism.
Secularism is defined as the separation of the state from religious institutions.
60
Bora_Horza_GobucholMar 18, 2026
+43
Actually WE DO WANT SECULARISM!! Please read the Handmaiden Tales
43
The_Munchies10Mar 18, 2026
-67
Let the people of Syria decide what they want and don’t impose your failed secularist liberal ideology on us.
-67
trahan94Mar 18, 2026
+59
Ah yes, Syria, the very definition of a successful state.
59
Bora_Horza_GobucholMar 18, 2026
+7
Bro you and I are the same do stfu
7
paullxMar 18, 2026
+5
You should, sharia is trash
5
[deleted]Mar 18, 2026
+2
[deleted]
2
The_Munchies10Mar 18, 2026
+1
Agreed. Those conservatives are uneducated hypocrites.
1
[deleted]Mar 18, 2026
+3
[deleted]
3
The_Munchies10Mar 18, 2026
I’m not a conservative. So, yes, all of them. Same goes for liberals. I mean the left and right are the wings of the same bird, you’re all a bunch of degenerate and depraved people.
0
betterWithPlotMar 21, 2026
+1
Except when you are a minority in the west.
1
MarcysdadMar 18, 2026
+112
Jolani "used" to be Isis /Al Quaida - which is as believable as "former gays" who were turned by the power of faith
Things will get worse and remember there won't be elections any time soon in Syria.
112
MorphinepillMar 19, 2026
+1
We would rather keep democracy to the US it’s clearly working there lol
1
life_hacker_14Mar 18, 2026
-23
nah i think he is not that bad. lets wait and see
-23
MarcysdadMar 18, 2026
+16
If you say so
16
Shahariar_909Mar 18, 2026
-37
Dumbasses like you are the problem who dont even try to find out whats in the article. Its 2026 every news portal is using provocative titles
-37
Ambitious-Poet4992Mar 18, 2026
+34
What did he say that was wrong? Is Syria not being ruled by former isis members?
34
Cultural-Papaya9257Mar 19, 2026
+1
The fact you equate Isis and Al Qaeda already tells us enough. Why do you feel the need to post if you are this uninformed about the topic?
1
[deleted]Mar 18, 2026
-22
[deleted]
-22
Ambitious-Poet4992Mar 18, 2026
+13
The f*** you mean doesn’t fit my agenda? Cause why would it change? What narrative am I spreading that the USA funded rebels who turned out to be extremists and went on to form isis and other terrorist groups
13
[deleted]Mar 18, 2026
-8
[deleted]
-8
MarcysdadMar 18, 2026
+10
What if Hitler had surrendered in 1945 and said.
I"'m a former Nazi.
Water under the bridge, right? "
Sorry a guy with videos of beheading he committed that are 1 google search away isn't trustworthy
10
[deleted]Mar 18, 2026
-9
[deleted]
-9
MarcysdadMar 18, 2026
+8
Haven't seen many videos or photos of heads of state beheading people .
With Jolani they're 1 google search away.
Maybe you're into this stuff.
8
[deleted]Mar 18, 2026
[deleted]
0
light_white_seamewMar 18, 2026
+6
> The ban doesnt apply to the group most likely to use alcohol
The ban doesn't apply to the group the government allows to use alcohol. Of course, the ones who are legally permitted to drink it will be the ones most likely to drink it.
The article also says:
>WOMAN ARRESTED FOR FAILING TO OBSERVE RAMADAN FASTING
It seems pretty clear the government is not going to be secular. Not being in ISIS anymore doesn't mean they won't enforce religious extremism.
6
MarcysdadMar 18, 2026
+2
Why is he there without elections and why won't he hold elections for a foreseeable future ?
Why are alewites and Christians not safe anymore?
And no - Assad wasn't a good guy before you accuse me of believing that
2
[deleted]Mar 18, 2026
-2
[deleted]
-2
MarcysdadMar 18, 2026
+3
A true free country holds elections and thereby determines their leadership.
The war is over, the rebels have won.
Completely different situation than Ukraine
Zelynsky got into power after the removal of the previous head of state and him being elected
3
life_hacker_14Mar 18, 2026
-1
show me one true free country . i'll wait.
-1
[deleted]Mar 18, 2026
-1
[deleted]
-1
MarcysdadMar 18, 2026
+2
If he were a good leader , Israel wouldn't need to attack.
He's an untamable dog.
2
Nal1999Mar 18, 2026
+23
That's the softest thing the Al Queda Leader is gonna implement.
23
EsKaL13Mar 18, 2026
+77
I am not only syrian, but also in Damascus right now, its a fkn lie, they banned Alcohol seeling and drinking in the city Except for 3 big areas where the majority of the people are christions
Do NOT believe everything the news wright, they are trying to force anti Syrian agenda only cuz the Goverment are muslims ans not something else.
77
dawgblogitMar 18, 2026
+26
To be fair there really isn't much difference... a complete ban in one city sounds more like a future nationwide ban.
A ban but in 3 areas.. sounds like a full ban is coming.
I would be happy to be wrong.
26
wrld_news_pmrbnd_meMar 18, 2026
+36
But why ban alcohol at all? Can people not control themselves? This seems like an overstep of power, the opposite of an “open and free” Syria.
36
Shahariar_909Mar 18, 2026
+34
Why ban **drugs** at all? Can people not control themselves? This seems like an overstep of power, the opposite of an "open and free " Syria
34
fevered_visionsMar 18, 2026
+22
this may come as a shock to you, but many of us think the War on Drugs is stupid as well
22
possiblyMorpheusMar 18, 2026
+4
Yeah, there’s no point in banning those either lol
4
VividGood8365Mar 18, 2026
+12
I agree. The government should legalize them, and only sell in small quantities to people. Government should have a monopoly over drugs and alcohol.
12
ahfooMar 20, 2026
+1
How about the government just piss the f*** off when it comes to people's personal lifestyle decisions? Governments are for regulating public interactions. Private affairs are not the business of the government. What goes on behind closed doors is not the government's business as long as it doesn't involve victimizing others.
1
thomasrat1Mar 18, 2026
-3
That’s basically how Russia funded their economy for a long time.
Believe it or not, ya don’t want your government’s way of fundraising, to involve getting people addicted to stuff
-3
chatte__lunatiqueMar 19, 2026
+2
This but unironically
2
wrld_news_pmrbnd_meMar 18, 2026
-6
I don’t disagree with the point you’re making, but the fact is that alcohol is still viewed differently from drugs in many societies and is more socially acceptable. Not here to debate whether or not they should be treated the same.
-6
AdMoist5134Mar 18, 2026
+24
"the fact is that alcohol is still viewed differently from drugs in many societies" - well yes, in MANY societies...but usually not so much in a muslim societies where the Quran forbids it, they allow Christians to sell and drink alcohol which is already a bit more progressive so what is the issue?
the idea that syria after what happened will be a fully secular or western society, that idea best leave at the door
24
wrld_news_pmrbnd_meMar 18, 2026
+1
That’s exactly my point! Even the Assad regime was trying to move Syria to be an open and secular society, one of the few positives. People thought that would continue under the new leadership, but clearly they’d rather rule by the fist and fail like every other country that tried a similar path.
1
Random_AdMar 18, 2026
-6
That’s the bare minimum what are u saying?
-6
[deleted]Mar 18, 2026
-9
[deleted]
-9
prophishonalMar 18, 2026
+1
If alcohol were invented today, it would be a schedule 1 controlled substance. Absolutely no medical use, high addiction potential, extreme social damage possible, and withdrawals that can legitimately kill people.
Yet cannabis was schedule 1, and has none of those issues. Upside down world we live in.
1
fevered_visionsMar 18, 2026
+2
> Absolutely no medical use
I mean that's just not true. It's an impromptu painkiller if you don't have anything better. Rubbing alcohol is used as a disinfectant. Mouthwashes are at least partly alcohol.
apparently there's a [Wikipedia article](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcohols_\(medicine\)) on it heh
2
JohnnnyOnTheSpotMar 18, 2026
-2
Cannabis is a federal crime in the United States lol
-2
ClosetLadyGhostMar 18, 2026
+10
This is just propaganda news. The same could be said for every fking country. Here's some from US .
Mississippi: While the state is now "wet" by default, several counties and cities still vote to remain dry.
Arkansas: Approximately 30 of 75 counties are dry.
Tennessee: Moore County, home to the Jack Daniel's distillery, is dry, meaning the product cannot be sold in stores or restaurants there
10
MajorPlanetMar 18, 2026
+16
Dry doesn’t mean it’s illegal to drink
16
ClosetLadyGhostMar 18, 2026
+16
Neither is it there.
16
onomatophobia1Mar 18, 2026
+1
How much in % of the city is christian or are christian neighbourhoods? Cos last time I checked, christians were quite the minority.
1
onomatophobia1Mar 18, 2026
How big are these neighbourhoods? Cos I checked how big the christian population of damascus is and apparently it's around 10 to 15%. If that's the case, alcohol is pretty much banned then unless you are telling me that christians control 90% of the city.
0
Dblcut3Mar 19, 2026
+1
Honestly 10-15% is way more than I wouldve assumed
1
JoshDrakoMar 18, 2026
+5
what is religion?
A point of view to impose.
5
GreatEmperorAcaMar 18, 2026
+10
al qaeda gonna al qaeda
10
invalidmail2000Mar 18, 2026
+15
People making the ban of alcohol out to be the same as the Taliban.
No shortage of countries that ban or restrict alcohol
15
Sir-SporkMar 18, 2026
+23
Seriously, there are plenty of towns and cities that ban alcohol in the US alone
23
joozyanMar 18, 2026
+10
And we think those bans are stupid and if anyone tried to institute a new ban we would rightfully criticize it. We shouldn’t let Middle Eastern repressive regimes off the hook for doing bad things just because we also do bad things.
10
PopeSaintHilariusMar 18, 2026
+12
>And we think those bans are stupid and if anyone tried to institute a new ban we would rightfully criticize it.
Does your sense of "we" include the people actually living in those communities?
If some communities don't want to allow alcohol, because of its many harms, then why does the opinion of people living outside of those communities matter?
>We shouldn’t let Middle Eastern repressive regimes off the hook for doing bad things just because we also do bad things.
What makes this a "bad thing" for them to do though? Virtually every country restricts harmful substances, despite some people enjoying them - it's just a matter of which ones, and where to draw the line.
To be clear, I'm a non-religious Canadian and I do consume alcohol, but I've also traveled to a remote indigenous community that bans it. Who am I to say that they should allow it?
If most people in Damascus want alcohol sales to be allowed, then that's an issue. But if most support this restriction, then it's a reasonable policy (especially since it includes an exemption for 3 majority-Christian areas).
12
invalidmail2000Mar 18, 2026
+5
Okay? Are "we" the people of syria?
5
joozyanMar 18, 2026
-3
Is this the defense you use when the men of Afghanistan force their women to wear burqas? There are certain objective standards of morality that specific cultures fail to uphold. I’m not saying allowing booze rises to that level, but I say that just to point out why your defense is inadequate.
-3
invalidmail2000Mar 18, 2026
+5
Depends on if the people of that country (including the women) want it or not.
What's to say the people of syria (a majority at least) don't want alcohol to be legal, which I wouldn't be shocked at all for that to be the case, why can't they dictate their own moral compass.
5
MorphinepillMar 19, 2026
+1
Look another american thinking he’s the world police ^
1
invalidmail2000Mar 18, 2026
+4
It's not necessarily a bad thing, a government can decide to protect it's people from harms. Literally every country does. Just because they have set the line slightly further for something that literally is bad for you doesn't make them a repressive regime
4
UrzuckMar 18, 2026
+8
Yeah, but they are not managed by one of the leaders of Al-Qaida lol, the US just put a suit on him and called it a day.
8
fevered_visionsMar 18, 2026
are you familiar with what a flop Prohibition was nationwide?
0
shawhtkMar 18, 2026
+3
Assumed it had already been illegal.
3
[deleted]Mar 18, 2026
[deleted]
0
ValuableAstronomer75Mar 18, 2026
+20
largest capital on the planet?
20
superjambiMar 18, 2026
+5
Was there any actual tourism from non Muslim countries over the last, what, 15 years?
5
SnooPoems4127Mar 18, 2026
+17
Its one of the oldest cities in the world and its nowhere near the largest capital on the planet, what are you smoking there?
17
alexandria33197Mar 18, 2026
+11
I went to Syria last Easter, only a few months after Assad was overthrown. Tourism there is still pretty limited and there was definitely fear by minority groups about the new government.
But it seems this new policy doesn’t affect Christian majority areas.
11
tabrizziMar 18, 2026
+4
It does:
From the article:
>Info free digital or physical edition of the book is available at Raise Your SpiriThe decree, issued by the Damascus governorate on Monday evening, requires that nightclub and bar licences be converted into café licences and restricts the sale of alcohol to sealed bottles for takeaway and only in predominantly Christian areas.
4
jcw99Mar 18, 2026
+7
>largest capital on the planet.
By which metric?
105km^2 metro area and 2.8 million inhabitants.
China's capital Beijing is 16,400 km^2 and 21 million inhabitants.
Even just in the region, Baghdad is 5200 Km^2 with 6.8 million inhabitants
Also... What Tourism? The area has been in the middle of a civil war for the last decade that's only recently cooled down, there is basically no tourism.
7
tabrizziMar 18, 2026
+5
>This ruling is another step back for an Islamic country.
We made it possible. Taking secular states and making them Islamic states is what we do best. Iraq, Libya, now Syria. The new leader of Syria is a former Al-Qaeda leader.
5
The_Munchies10Mar 18, 2026
-15
A step back economically? Yes. Step forward in preventing all the harms of alcohol.
Actually, it’s a step forward even economically because less money spent on dealing with problems that comes from alcohol.
-15
Wolf4980Mar 18, 2026
-10
Brought to you by the US-backed Jolani regime. Was it worth it, to destroy Syria just to replace a secular dicator with a pro-US Islamist dictator? Perhaps US elites will say yes. But as is always the case in imperialist adventures like this, it's the Syrian people who will pay the biggest price.
-10
GastroidMar 18, 2026
+36
>Was it worth it, to destroy Syria just to replace a secular dicator with a pro-US Islamist dictator?
You mean the secular dictator who ran a powder keg of a country and decided the best course of action was to drop barrel bombs on neighborhoods? That dictator?
36
HotlLavaMar 18, 2026
+7
If anything Jolani is Erdogan-backed.
As we currently see in Iran, the US wanting to change a regime does not magically make it happen, so it's too simplistic to blame everything that happens in the world on backroom deals in the USA.
7
mightyblackgooseMar 18, 2026
+11
A bigger price than the previous guy murdering almost a million of them?
11
Wolf4980Mar 18, 2026
+2
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_massacres_of_Syrian_Alawites
The proxy dictator you support just killed thousands of Alawites
2
Mediocre-Risk3581Mar 18, 2026
+4
The most common estimate is set at 1.2k, as tragic as that was, how is that comparable to what Bashar did?
4
fevered_visionsMar 18, 2026
+2
so you're saying you prefer a million deaths to a thousand?
2
yzerman88Mar 18, 2026
+7
A pro-Assad take?
7
quiplaamMar 18, 2026
+13
Jolani and HTS were not one of the groups backed by the US during the civil war. Since the end of the war, his peaceful and technocratic rhetoric had shifted western perspective, and now the US and most of its allies tentatively support him.
13
Wolf4980Mar 18, 2026
-1
Do you think the CIA isn't capable of secretly giving material support to HTS?
-1
SprinklesCurrent8332Mar 18, 2026
+25
Why does it need to be the CIA secretly when Türkiye was doing it openly?
25
quiplaamMar 18, 2026
+14
The US openly gave support to other groups like the Free Syrian Army (really an alliance of many groups) and the SDF.
14
Wolf4980Mar 18, 2026
-1
Openly supporting a group like HTS would make the US look incredibly bad, so of course they didn't do it openly
-1
Win32errorMar 18, 2026
+6
They could, but the US isn't always behind every single thing.
6
Zentick-Mar 18, 2026
+1
So tragic. We really must contemplate was exiling the tyrant really worth LOSING BARS? My heart goes out to the Syrian people ❤️🩹
1
Wolf4980Mar 18, 2026
+1
interesting to see the side which called opponents of the US proxy war in Syria dictator apologists for a decade instantly turning into apologists for a brutal Islamist dictator now that the dictator is pro-US. zero principles, just pure campism.
1
nathanwilson26Mar 18, 2026
There are plenty of counties in the US that ban the sale of alcohol. Some states restrict the sale of alcohol to just bars (which are also are subject to zoning restrictions) and state run stores.
0
tabrizziMar 18, 2026
-1
Step by step to Sharia law.
We (the USA) is very good at creating Islamic states from once-secular ones.
-1
ClosetLadyGhostMar 18, 2026
+6
This is just propaganda news. The same could be said for every fking country. Here's some from US .
Mississippi: While the state is now "wet" by default, several counties and cities still vote to remain dry.
Arkansas: Approximately 30 of 75 counties are dry.
Tennessee: Moore County, home to the Jack Daniel's distillery, is dry, meaning the product cannot be sold in stores or restaurants there
6
PopeSaintHilariusMar 18, 2026
+7
Some small communities in Canada's northern territories are also dry, and restrict the sale and/or consumption of alcohol.
It is interesting and newsworthy that Damascus is getting more strict about this, as it could be a sign of further changes to come, but on its own, it's not really something to be outraged about IMO.
And the fact that they are allowing alcohol sales to continue in 3 Christian-majority neighbourhoods seems like a positive sign, in terms of them respecting pluralism and the differing views of their minority religions.
7
ClosetLadyGhostMar 18, 2026
+3
I think more than anything else the important thing to note is the publics response to it. People across the board are pissed , and still selling booze but not in bottles, instead in tea cups, or whatever workarounds they found.
All this says is some shitty rule was passed by the govt. I'm sure we can all find parallels in our own countries in the past few months of similar things.
3
PopeSaintHilariusMar 18, 2026
+2
Yes if the people in Damascus are opposed to this, then that's a valid concern.
There's nothing inherently wrong with restricting alcohol IMO, but ideally changes like that should reflect the public will (at least for the majority).
If the leaders want that change but most people don't, then they should make the case and try to convince the public first, rather than just imposing it.
2
ClosetLadyGhostMar 18, 2026
+2
Agree, but leaders will do shit to appease their main backers or lobbies first if they want to stay in. Again not a behaviour constrained to any one country. For the most part.
2
translinguisticMar 18, 2026
+1
Texas is fun too. You can have different Justice of the Peace precincts in a city, some of which might be dry.
1
ClosetLadyGhostMar 18, 2026
+1
Hell, these are only the places that are dry 24/7, i na lot of other counties it's becomes illegal to sell past a certain time, like 11pm. So add that to the list.
Just to add, let's not forget amish communitys where fking everything is banned.
1
EsKaL13Mar 18, 2026
-7
Well we are muslims majority, what if we want sharia law ??? What then ?? Gonna bomb the shit out of us ??????
We will do what ever the f*** we want, go deal with the orange fat f***** who r*** kids and then talk about other countrys and thier political system !
-7
DandD_GamersMar 18, 2026
+8
Mentioning kids while praising Islam will never not be funny.
Like a pedophile shouting at another pedo
Lol.
8
paullxMar 18, 2026
+1
Your prophet and The orange one would get along
1
steelangerMar 18, 2026
+2
Here we go again. Taliban has shown us the way this will go.
2
[deleted]Mar 18, 2026
+2
[deleted]
2
LePetitJeremySapoudMar 18, 2026
Still allowed in the main christian majority areas… for now
0
michaelefferMar 21, 2026
+1
Step by step until full sharia.
1
frn8Mar 18, 2026
+1
Its becoming clear that the destabilizing of the middle east countries was Israel's objective all along. The west always believed that the American interventions would indeed bring peace but it is showing that everywhere they went, only became worse.
1
Aranthos-FarothMar 18, 2026
Syria going full Iran soon.
So sad to see.
0
sillyhands1Mar 18, 2026
-1
Good. Drugs and alcohol do nothing good for society.
-1
ch25stam25Mar 18, 2026
+1
Adults shouldnt be treated as kids. Let people makr that choice
1
sillyhands1Mar 18, 2026
-1
Should we also let adults make the decision to murder someone? Let’s make murder legal because surely every adult will make the correct decision to not murder right? That is how you sound. Do you realize why laws exist? They are meant to help society and lead them to make correct decisions. Alcohol and recreational drugs provide zero benefits and only harm. The only people who think otherwise are addicts in denial or very young people with no real world experience. This is coming from someone who drinks. I wish it were illegal as it would make quitting much easier.
-1
ch25stam25Mar 19, 2026
+1
Dont be daft
1
MCRN_AdmiralMar 18, 2026
-8
Check out all the Mossad agents in here trying to act like Alcohol = Vitamin C, and banning it is "bad". lmao
143 Comments