· 152 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events May 4, 2026 at 2:03 PM

Taiwan president defiant as he begins Eswatini trip; China calls him a 'rat'

Posted by ZenX22



🚩 Report this post

152 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
Fuzzy-Sweat6416 May 4, 2026 +182
Nice to see big grown adults insulting each other at the playground. We never really grow up do we?
182
Emperor_Zar May 4, 2026 +35
You know what sucks? That’s rhetorical we all do. Is that the world is literally run like recess in elementary school. It’s just stupid and exceptionally dangerous and harmful.
35
janethefish May 4, 2026 +16
It is nice to see people can criticize their President in the RoC
16
Stiimpoops 6 days ago +12
>Pro-China TV Station Goes Off Air in Taiwan After Losing Broadcast License https://thediplomat.com/2020/12/pro-china-tv-station-goes-off-air-in-taiwan-after-losing-broadcast-license/
12
SanityIsOptional 6 days ago +15
After seeing what Faux News has done to the US, I'm not necessarily opposed to this...
15
OtakuAttacku 6 days ago +26
Tolerance paradox and all. If we tolerate the intolerant, the intolerant will destroy a tolerant society. For a tolerant society to exist, we must be intolerant of the intolerant.
26
dontknow16775 5 days ago +2
This is so important
2
RemarkableBread9664 6 days ago -8
Get off my lawn!
-8
Remote-Frosting-9943 4 days ago +1
Well do what a normal person would watch another news source this isn't rocket science.😁😉🙄
1
SanityIsOptional 4 days ago +2
Unfortunately we can't make other people stop watching propaganda and fake news.
2
Remote-Frosting-9943 4 days ago +1
Name a cable news network that isn’t except NN they at least make an effort.
1
SanityIsOptional 4 days ago +2
Reuters, AP news. Many networks are biased. Only one was founded specifically as propaganda and has defended itself in court by claiming that reasonable people wouldn't think they are telling the truth.
2
pepehandreee 5 days ago +2
Eh, I will take them throwing insults and trade verbal abuses over them ordering people to shoot each other dead.
2
Ahelex May 4, 2026 +11
China really doesn't know how to stay quiet and win on soft power.
11
onarainyafternoon 6 days ago +23
Most of the time they do, though, actually.
23
Lurkadactyl 6 days ago +9
Not if Japan or Taiwan is involved.
9
jeffismybaby May 4, 2026 -10
DPP starts that kind of shit. They shouldn't respond though
-10
bjran8888 6 days ago -5
Americans always forget that China remains divided to this day because you invaded China in 1950 (by sending warships into the Taiwan Strait). What if China had sent a fleet during the American Civil War, causing the United States to remain divided to this day?
-5
thatsnotwait 6 days ago +4
I don't think most people forget that, but I'm not sure why it's relevant. Civil wars regularly have foreign entities supporting one side or the other. Korea is an example that both China and the US invaded to keep divided (as in the war would have easily been won by the North if the USA stayed out, or the South if China had stayed out). The Chinese Civil War was 75 years ago. If the north had never been able to recapture Texas and stopped fighting for 75 years, I think most Americans would be content to move on and let Texas go.
4
ZealousidealDance990 5 days ago
China’s intervention happened because of America’s intervention. Equating the two is a complete distortion. The facts are very clear: ever since the end of World War II, the United States has been actively intervening around the world and splitting other countries. This is typical armchair criticism from a position of safety. In reality, Americans can’t even tolerate the slightest grievance for the sake of avenging 9/11, they were willing to repeatedly invade multiple countries.
0
AuroraFinem 5 days ago +3
This is some crazy circular logic. China intervened because North Korea was going to lose, not because of US involvement. If the South was winning without the US, China would have still intervened. It’s literally part of their core foreign policy to maintain North Korea as a buffer state. They didn’t want to risk a land border with a western adversary when it has India on the opposite side.
3
ZealousidealDance990 5 days ago -1
You can’t just reverse the order like that and make assumptions. In fact, it was the United States that first proposed dividing the Korean Peninsula into two halves, and it was also the United States that first intervened in the Korean Peninsula’s unification war. Even now, South Korea still considers itself and North Korea as one single country. Moreover, at that time there were still French and British colonies in Southeast Asia. According to your theory, China should have attacked Southeast Asia first.
-1
AuroraFinem 5 days ago +1
Yes, you actually can, that’s why it’s circular. We are still at war with North Korea, the civil war never ended, so no neither north or South Korea recognize 2 separate koreas, that’s kind of the entire point of a civil war. The existing boundaries are for purely political purposes and overall stability if the ceasefire is kept, but there has been no treaty. No, that doesn’t follow from my logic at all. Korea was in active civil war with a western superpower backing one of the sides and there was an effective leader opposing them to prop up to create a stalemate through proxy so there’s no retaliation. Or, you start a completely unprompted act of aggression starting wars directly with Europe almost certainly resulting in retaliation. I wonder what the best answer is? Where are those colonies now btw? I think China chose the right priority with my logic.
1
bjran8888 5 days ago
Neither North Korea nor South Korea is U.S. territory; sending troops to intervene is essentially an invasion of another country. To reiterate, if China had sent troops to the United States during the Civil War, leaving the country divided to this day, I wonder how Americans would feel about it.
0
AuroraFinem 5 days ago +1
Sure, but why would Canada or Mexico care? China wasn’t the one at civil war.
1
RemarkableBread9664 6 days ago -3
Were ifs and buts but candy and nuts China might have had a fleet. (Still doesn’t)
-3
Wafflez424 6 days ago +1
lol so you just deny objective reality that is easy to verify.. interesting perspective you have 😅
1
RemarkableBread9664 6 days ago +1
Talking blue water fleets here, read people read. Fleets I bet your left ear most of yall don’t even k ow the difference between a floating coconut and a purpose built deep water world traversing vessel
1
bjran8888 6 days ago -5
Yeah, but do we have enough nuclear submarines, strategic bombers, hypersonic intercontinental missiles, and orbital weapons? So it’s nuclear war, is it? Bring it on. Do you really think the Chinese are afraid of you? Ever heard of the Korean War? Who was driven back from the Yalu River to the 38th Parallel? And which foolish American general got relieved of his command? Ridiculous.
-5
RemarkableBread9664 6 days ago +2
Unfortunately for China the only thing the US need do to see it’s collapse is nothing
2
bjran8888 6 days ago
Really? Are you really going to say that? The situation right now is that we are watching Trump turn the United States and the entire world into a sea of fire.
0
One-Coat-6677 May 4, 2026 +95
People will see this as a win against "authoritarianism" while ignoring Eswatini is an absolute monarchy led with an iron fist by a joke of a leader with like a dozen wives.
95
Magdovus 6 days ago +6
Let's hope Donny doesn't hear about this dude 
6
FoxMeadow7 4 days ago +1
Well, beggars can’t exactly be choosers…
1
robexib 6 days ago -28
The difference between Eswatini and China is that China has nukes and imperialistic ambitions.
-28
MagneticRetard 6 days ago +52
Eswatini has an hiv rate of 27%. It’s absolute monarch hoards wealth and wifes up young women while its citizens are starving No amount of attempt to paint china and eswatini as even remotely the same will work
52
robexib 6 days ago -23
I don't see how pointing out differences is an attempt to paint two things as the same.
-23
MagneticRetard 6 days ago +22
Your post, especially in the context of what you are replying to, implies that China is worse because unlike Eswatini, China has imperialistic ambitions. But you secretly knew this was indefensible which is why you purposely worded your post in such a way that when someone like me calls you out, you are able to pivot to a softer position of "i was just merely pointing to a difference!!!" At least grow some f****** balls and stick to your position
22
Stiimpoops 6 days ago +30
Eswatini isn't the only authoritarian country Taiwan is funding. Lai is a little authoritarian himself and recently defended Imperial Japan and justified Japan's colonialism of Asia during WW2.
30
AuroraFinem 5 days ago +1
I can’t entirely blame Taiwan. With China’s stranglehold over the global conversation around Taiwan no major countries will recognize them as a sovereign state. Even the US won’t officially do so. They aren’t going to survive remaining entirely friendless on the global stage outside semiconductor buyers.
1
Remote-Frosting-9943 4 days ago +1
China been doing it for years.😅
1
CellistMundane9372 6 days ago -5
Is Lai himself authoritarian? Does he attempt to govern Taiwan as such?
-5
Stiimpoops 6 days ago +18
He tried purging opposition members from the government. >Former Vice President Annette Lu (DPP), has expressed criticism of the "Great Recall Movement," highlighting concerns about the potential for authoritarian tendencies within the party. She cautioned that the DPP might be overemphasizing anti-China rhetoric, potentially diverting attention from pressing domestic issues. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_Taiwanese_mass_electoral_recall_campaigns
18
CryptoThroway8205 6 days ago -1
Purging opposition isn't that uncommon even in democracies. Obviously all the people Trump has fired: Lisa Cook, like 6 or 7 4-star generals, The BLS chief. He demands strict loyalty tests and interview questions include whether the 2020 election was stolen. Iraq jailed Kurdish leaders before the 2025 election and after the 2017 independence referendum. Modi frequently seems to target opposition in the courts frequently on top of near total media control and takedowns of social media accounts like on youtube.
-1
TailorAncient8283 6 days ago +5
no,it means fire senators and congressmen to win a majority he didn't have. none of those succeeded though
5
neverspeakofme 4 days ago +2
He started a massive campaign to remove close to all opposition members from Parliament, and also jailed one of the most popular opposition party leaders without trial. Taiwan is like US. It is technically a democracy, but the safeguards are failing slowly as one party has successfully created a cult support base and is using that base to keeps testing the waters. Also imagine if 90% of news media in the US was controlled by republicans only.
2
robexib 6 days ago -12
Visiting a country isn't funding it, and Lai having a white-hot take on Japanese colonialism doesn't make Taiwan less of a democracy.
-12
Stiimpoops 6 days ago +11
>Lai visits Taiwan-funded projects in Eswatini https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2026/05/04/2003856736 Lai removing "Chinese' on the census to strip people of their Chinese heritage sounds democratic to me. Now 98% of Taiwan's population is ethnically classified as "Other"
11
robexib 6 days ago +7
According to your article, Lai's trying to establish some sort of economic deal with *their only African ally* and have to make sure there's an oil reserve *for situations like the one we're in now*. I'd like a source on the census bit.
7
stale2000 6 days ago +2
The majority of people in Taiwan identify as taiwanese actually.
2
Squirrelman2712 May 4, 2026 +34
Are they calling him a rat for any specific reason? Or is this just normal China/Taiwan sniping?
34
zhcterry1 6 days ago +27
There is a saying in Chinese that roughly translate to "When the Rat goes on the street, everyone yells kill it". It's founded on the idea of Rat being despised and hated, therefore it can only hide in the shadows, once it appears in public sight, everyone wants to kill it. Therefore, the most likely explanation is China indicating that Cai has to maneuver around air spaces, essentially "hiding like a rat in dark places" instead of walking in the open. Another less likely but imo still plausible explanation is an indication that Eswatini is itself a 'dark place', and is trying to ridicule Cai from trying to gain legitimacy from an obscure country. At the end of the day, the Goal of the Chinese government is and will always be to maintain the One China Principle, and the idea that the People's Republic of China is the true China. Thus, every response against Taiwan can be seen as either an attempt to exacerbate Taiwan's lack of legitimacy, or to remind everyone that major sovereign states recognize the One China Principle.
27
Squirrelman2712 6 days ago +4
Thank you! That was very thorough.
4
enersto 5 days ago +4
Nah, it's called as 窜访 and 过街老鼠一般, running in secret corners like a rat. But it doesn't mean calling him as a rat, just like calling someone as"snake in the grass" doesn't mean calling as a snake. It's possible that a reporter in Taiwan who sympathized Taiwan authority simplified the whole expression.
4
Squirrelman2712 5 days ago +1
That makes sense, thank you!
1
Remote-Frosting-9943 4 days ago +1
Normal ccp whining.😁
1
[deleted] May 4, 2026 -10
[removed]
-10
[deleted] May 4, 2026 +8
[removed]
8
hextanerf 6 days ago -1
I'm guessing it probably literal. There is despisal toward Lai, and that's all they're trying to convey. The original comment I replied to asked if there's any specific reason to use the phrase. I'm saying there isn't. It's just how we convey what we think of someone. I think of it as saying Lai crawled to Eswatini on fours in English
-1
Controller_Maniac 6 days ago +8
So if Lai called Xi a rat would it be considered a parable or a insult🤔 The double standards go crazy
8
hextanerf 6 days ago -2
Yep. I don't see any problem
-2
SweatyAdhesive May 4, 2026 +10
Common rhetoric for an insult lol. What's there to misunderstand
10
hextanerf 6 days ago -3
What a big brain you got...
-3
Cactuas 6 days ago +5
So what is China trying to say when they call Lai a rat? I could believe to that it doesn't have the same connotations in Chinese as it does in English, but what are the connotations?
5
hextanerf 6 days ago -4
It means despise obviously
-4
DonnyTheWalrus 6 days ago +5
OK, I'm having trouble understanding your original comment then. Do you think English doesn't have metaphors? We know they weren't literally saying he was a tiny four legged rodent. 
5
NewsCards May 4, 2026 +51
> China calls Lai a 'rat' who had 'skulked' his way there Woah, sick burn, China, you totally got him, you paper tiger ass.
51
Phyrexian_Archlegion May 4, 2026 +35
China is many things. A paper tiger is not one of them.
35
nasty_nater 6 days ago -2
Why not? Has their massive military been put to actual combat test? People said the same of Russia before Ukraine.
-2
3uphoric-Departure 6 days ago +5
That’s like calling the Russian nuclear arsenal a paper tiger because Russia hasn’t nuked an enemy in combat yet. And even though Russia’s military hasn’t yet steamrolled Ukraine, it’s caused tremendous damage and devastation.
5
v-komodoensis May 4, 2026 +50
Yeah, China is definitely a "paper tiger" in this day and age... 😐
50
Life_Drama7570 May 4, 2026 +13
If the paper was made of steel and running on AI
13
ReadWriteHexecute 6 days ago +3
they haven’t fought a war since 1979
3
paullx 6 days ago +13
yup, some countries could learn from that.
13
22stanmanplanjam11 May 4, 2026 -29
Literally yes, if the equipment they’ve exported to their partners was performing better they would have invaded Taiwan while America’s spread thin. Instead they purged their generals and a lot of their top engineers.
-29
Lirael_Gold May 4, 2026 +26
Chinese military exports have performed just fine, and I fail to see what that has to do with Taiwain.
26
22stanmanplanjam11 May 4, 2026 -10
That’s just not true is the thing.
-10
Plussydestroyer May 4, 2026 +12
You think Iran just got very lucky when they hit a US F35? Or when they hit the THAADs?
12
22stanmanplanjam11 May 4, 2026 -11
Yes. There have been over 15,000 combat missions flown over Iran. We lost 60 aircraft in a month doing that during Desert Storm which was one of the most horrifically lopsided military conflicts in history.
-11
Plussydestroyer 6 days ago +2
??? You think the US invests billions of dollars into 5th generation planes just to lose them to stray missiles?
2
22stanmanplanjam11 6 days ago
It uh, wasn’t lost. It made an emergency landing at the closest airbase but that was still like 500 km away. Also the flyaway cost for an F-35 is roughly 85-100 million. It’s the same cost as the non-stealth 4th generation European options like a Rafale, Gripen, or Eurofighter.
0
Mysterious_Past6277 May 4, 2026 -22
Maduro really loves his chinese equipment, same with iran, almost like Iran's best equipment is iran made.... says a lot with a theocratic dictator makes better equipment than china, china prob gets all its working equipment from north korea 
-22
Lirael_Gold May 4, 2026 +21
The MANPAD that almost downed an F35 over Iran was chinese made. (and yes, I know that *almost* isn't the same as actually shooting it down, but it's the first time in the F35's history that anything has even come close) And, it's a little unfair to specify the two conflicts where both countries were/are fighting the most capable airforce on the planet. Thailand seems to like their VT-4's, and by most accounts they performed pretty well in the recent Thai/Cambodia conflict. Same goes for Pakistan during their recent conflict with India, particularly the PL-15 air-to-air missiles, Chinese made jets downed at least 3 Indian jets. Pakistan is also considering ordering J-35A's, which they probably wouldn't be doing if they were dissatisfied with the J-10C's performance.
21
jeffismybaby May 4, 2026 +10
How's paper tiger Iran doing in the war?
10
Remote-Frosting-9943 4 days ago +2
Iran not looking good. Seems like everyone china supports always lose. Iranian Venezuela russia is struggling big time. They got kick out of panama etc. Yeah their a paper tiger they like to whine and cry a lot.😉
2
jeffismybaby 4 days ago +2
Why is Donald begging for a peace deal then?
2
amodelsino 6 days ago
Given they're literally collapsing as a nation without having killed a single enemy or destroyed a single enemy ship or aircraft? Literally historically possibly the worst a country has ever done in a war. Probably the only more embarrassing fight put up is by their best buddies Russia given they're actually fighting a land war with deployed troops and losing badly to a country they were supposed to roll over in 3 days.
0
jeffismybaby 6 days ago +8
Why is the strait still closed, wasn't it supposed to be open in 2 weeks, 8 weeks ago?
8
[deleted] 6 days ago -3
[deleted]
-3
jeffismybaby 6 days ago +5
You mean their strategy is playing out exactly as expected? Iran didn't configure its military to resist a US invasion, China has
5
KDR_11k 6 days ago +2
Iran did configure its military to resist the US, just not in the way a peer adversary would. They assumed that most of their gear and leadership would get bombed pretty quickly and set up a contingency plan that devolved authority to local commanders who then execute a low-power equivalent of MAD by destroying oil infrastructure all across the gulf and block shipping through the strait.
2
jeffismybaby 6 days ago +1
Militarily resist a US invasion is what I stated before 
1
KDR_11k 6 days ago +2
Invasion to me means ground forces, we don't know for sure how that would work out for the US but expectations so far are that it wouldn't go well.
2
Remote-Frosting-9943 4 days ago +1
Yup that what iraq said. 
1
[deleted] 6 days ago -2
[deleted]
-2
jeffismybaby 6 days ago +1
Lmao the Iranians never claimed to be able to resist a US invasion, you might want to look up what paper tiger means. They're doing exactly as well as our and their strategists have expected and Donald Trump is a dumbass for ignoring them
1
KDR_11k 6 days ago +1
The current administration would absolutely carpet bomb Iran if that was doable. However it knows a ground invasion will be a disaster which is why the US is hanging back and sniping at Iran, praying that someone else will take the blame for the Hormuz blockade. Wars aren't decided by kill counts.
1
LordMashie 6 days ago +8
How DARE you visit this country in Africa that half the world probably doesn’t even know exists! lmao
8
Gjappy 6 days ago +2
He can do as he pleases.
2
bappestinian May 4, 2026 +1
The 玻璃心 do love to whine.
1
jeffismybaby May 4, 2026 -2
Not like green strawberry milk boys
-2
greatestmofo May 4, 2026 -15
How though? Cause if your heart is made of glass, the heart would be brittle and cannot pump blood, and therefore the people with glass-hearts can't be alive due to a lack of oxygen. This is just basic biology, really.
-15
DirtyOldManInRC May 4, 2026 +3
And in other breaking news this morning, water is wet.
3
SgtRuy 6 days ago +1
Wasn't he a bit open to improving relation ships with China?
1
taidibao1 5 days ago +1
In the same angle those others that fall in line with china are “mouse”?
1
2Dumb4GalacticEmpire 2 days ago +1
Obviously not fans of Dale Carnegie.
1
thegreatmango May 4, 2026 -6
They're just mad he's the real China.
-6
greatestmofo May 4, 2026 +13
So Taiwan is the real China? Or is Taiwan independent? I'm very confused which is correct.
13
thegreatmango May 4, 2026 +1
Good question! Taiwan is the "Republic of China", the remnants of what was the historical Han China that was kicked out by the communist party. It's complicated. "The political and international status of Taiwan is contentious. Despite being a founding member, the ROC no longer represents China as a member of the United Nations after UN members voted in 1971 to recognize the PRC instead. The ROC maintained its claim to be the sole legitimate representative of China and its territory until 1991, when it ceased to regard the Chinese Communist Party as a rebellious group and acknowledged its control over mainland China. Taiwan is claimed by the PRC, which refuses to establish diplomatic relations with countries that recognise the ROC."
1
kokakamora 6 days ago +6
Therein lies Taiwan's problem. If they had just declared themselves a new country like US did from England I don't think there would be all this drama. Of course China is not going to like Taiwan calling itself the real China.
6
aoeu_ 5 days ago +2
> If they had just declared themselves a new country like US did from England I don't think there would be all this drama. My understanding is that it's actually the exact opposite. Most people in mainland China are very firm on the idea of national unity; they would rather Taiwan (ROC) claim to be the real China than declare independence. There are currently 2 major political parties in Taiwan: the DPP and the KMT. The DPP favours Taiwanese independence, whereas the KMT maintains the view that the Republic of China is the only legal government of China. The CCP's relationship with the KMT is much better than its relationship with the DPP. For example, Xi Jinping has met with current and former KMT leaders on multiple occasions: * The [meeting in 2015](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_meeting_of_Ma_Ying-jeou_and_Xi_Jinping) between Xi Jinping and Ma Ying-jeou (president of Taiwan at that time and former chairman of the KMT) was the first meeting between leaders of the two sides since the end of the Chinese Civil War in 1949; they met again [in 2024](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_meeting_of_Ma_Ying-jeou_and_Xi_Jinping) * Last month, Xi Jinping [met with KMT chairwoman Cheng Li-wun](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visit_by_Cheng_Li-wun_to_mainland_China) In contrast, this is the CCP's stance on the pro-independence DPP: * [China threatened to impose the death penalty on Taiwan separatists](https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china-issues-guidelines-criminal-punishment-diehard-taiwan-separatists-2024-06-21/) * [The CCP has stated that "Pro-independence provocations of DPP pose greatest threat to cross-Straits peace"](https://www.chinadailyhk.com/hk/article/242446) * ... and in the article linked by the OP, China called Lai Ching-te (president of Taiwan and chairman of the DPP) a "rat"
2
kokakamora 5 days ago +1
Yes, I do believe that is the case now but back in the 1970s I think they had a chance to say they are a new country and not "real China". I think they would have been better accepted then.
1
greatestmofo 5 days ago +1
Potentially, but that was the case then.
1
greatestmofo May 4, 2026 +2
Thanks for the explanation. To add on, this was due to a Chinese civil war between the then-ruling ROC and the usurper CCP, which the CCP ultimately gained control of the Mainland and ROC retreating to Taiwan. So has the civil war ended? Were their any armistice or peace treaty signed between the two Chinese groups?
2
thegreatmango May 4, 2026 +3
No, no armistice or treaty was ever signed, but open conflict hasn't happened since 1979 when the US established relations with the PRC. They're technically still in conflict.
3
hextanerf May 4, 2026 -7
CCP didn't usurp. Kwomintang and CCP signed a treaty to form a bipartisan state, and Kuomintang tore it, starting the civil war. It ended with Chiang fleeing to Taiwan and the establishment of PRC
-7
ewillyp 6 days ago +1
well in Chinese zodiac year of the rat isn't necessarily a *BAD* thing… s/
1
[deleted] May 4, 2026 -7
[deleted]
-7
TheShishkabob May 4, 2026 +9
He hasn't jumped ship. Taiwan's been separate from China since before he was even born.
9
thinkingperson 6 days ago +1
Woah ... President Lai managed to visit Eswatini ... China might as well give up now. Next up, Lai should call for referendum to dissolve the Republic of China and its ROC constitution, establish a Republic of Taiwan constitution, declare independence and submit application for membership in UN. I mean, with Eswatini's support, UN membership is just a matter of going through the motion. China, you've been served.
1
jollyrogerbay_ May 4, 2026 -7
Communism is supposed to be agaisnt imperialism yet china really wants taiwan they're nothing but state capitalist rats
-7
nasty_nater 6 days ago +1
Lmao when tf was communism anti-imperialist? Look at the 20th century. Communist Russia had imperialist tendencies almost everywhere on the globe.
1
BusyHands_ May 4, 2026 -14
F*** China. F*** Xi Jinping. Nothing but Asian version of America and Pedophile Trump
-14
AtLeastIHaveJob May 4, 2026 -1
Can’t say that I agree totally with the comparison to the U.S. I mean china lifted 250M people out of poverty. They have functional public transports systems. Healthcare systems etc etc. There’s several things wrong with China sure, but I don’t think they’re anything like the United States
-1
BusyHands_ May 4, 2026 -9
No different than US at the turn of industrialization and after WW2 in regards to its population living standards picking up..
-9
[deleted] May 4, 2026 -6
[removed]
-6
guineapigenjoyer123 May 4, 2026 -10
Americans need to make everything about themselves
-10
greatestmofo May 4, 2026 -33
Let him visit. Taiwan's days are numbered after all
-33
MrBluer May 4, 2026 +17
Speaking of numbers how do we feel about 06041989? Or alternatively 04061989? Or June 4th 1989 in date format.
17
hextanerf May 4, 2026 -7
probably the only thing you ever know about China. Numbers? Do you have one for the Native Americans, or the slaves Europe sold everywhere? Whataboutism at it's finest
-7
greatestmofo May 4, 2026 -18
Sorry, this topic is beyond my scope. Try another topic.
-18
zakabog May 4, 2026 +12
Have you ever noticed how much China's President resembles a certain cartoon bear that recently entered the public domain?
12
greatestmofo May 4, 2026 +2
Yeah Winnie the Pooh, I like that comparison. Very funny and cute.
2
LionBastard1 May 4, 2026 +17
>Let him visit. Taiwan's days are numbered after all Found a CCP bot
17
greatestmofo May 4, 2026 -6
Hello, I am a CCP bot. Every reply I make earns me $0.50 cents. Please support me 😊
-6
Mysterious_Past6277 May 4, 2026 +4
Supporting the modern day nazis is a werid choice. 
4
greatestmofo May 4, 2026 +14
Why bring Israel into the discussion?
14
Mysterious_Past6277 May 4, 2026 +5
Not sure dont like them, but I really support the Taiwanese in taking back their colony of china thats run by Winnie the pooh and can only steal things to get ahead cuz they are too stoopiddddd
5
greatestmofo May 4, 2026 +4
Then just declare independence. After all, the Chinese are too stoopiddddd as you say, Taiwan can easily outsmart them. They have big daddy America behind them too right? On a completely and utterly different whataboutism topic, why is Taiwan's national airline called China Airlines? Why is Taiwan called ROC? And why do they have so many Chinese artefacts in their museums?
4
MrBluer May 4, 2026 +10
I mean it’s kind of a South Korea situation. Why should they give up their national identity just because some dictator state thinks they’re the legitimate ones?
10
greatestmofo May 4, 2026 +1
Did Taiwan give up their national identity? From my understanding, all citizens of Taiwan are entitled to the Taiwanese passport, which says 中華民國 on it. 中華民國 translates to Republic of China.
1
Nerevarine91 May 4, 2026 +5
Of course, Beijing has explicitly said a declaration of independence by Taiwan would be an act of war, but I’m sure you already know that and were just hoping we didn’t
5
greatestmofo May 4, 2026 +2
Who cares about what Beijing says, they say a lot of things. Have you heard of [China's final warning](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China%27s_final_warning)? Don't worry about China they can do nothin'. Even their missiles have water in them. Taiwan has America, has liberal democracy, and has the world's most advanced chips. They are untouchable. If I were Taiwan, I'd man up and declare independence, rather than be under China's shadow constantly.
2
stale2000 6 days ago +2
But they are getting everything that they want right now you realize that right? They are defacto independent, have every benefit of independence, and all they have to do is play a little bit of make believe and china leaves them alone. Why would the people of taiwan care whats written on a piece of paper when they have had their independence for the last 70 years already? Its a pretty easy small thing to give up, having to play a little bit of make believe and china just leaves them alone entirely.
2
greatestmofo 6 days ago +1
In what sense? They kaopeh all the time China this China that, but can't even decide if they are China or independent or not.
1
stale2000 6 days ago +1
They have their own land, their own people, their own army, their own laws, their own taxes, their own everything. That is independence in every sense of the word. Whether or not a piece of paper says it is irrelevant. Independence is not an episode of the office where you are only independent if you stand up in the middle of the room and say "I declare independence!" Independence simply means that you have your own borders, land, people, laws, army, and taxes. *Declaring* it is just words on a piece of paper. That means that they have gotten everything that they wanted, all that independence offers, and all they have to do to get it is play a bit of make believe and China left they alone for 70 years.
1
hextanerf May 4, 2026 +1
Lolz Even Taiwanese are Han ethnicity. F*** you and your colonialism
1
iTzGiR May 4, 2026 +2
Why do people say this? Is it just to downplay China's acts of ethnic cleansing and their literal concentration camps? Like yeah, two things can be true at the same time, no reason to deflect the awful things China does with a "Yeah but Israel!", yeah, they both love ethnic cleansing huge populations.
2
gooberfishie May 4, 2026 -25
That f*****'s been camping the extraction again. At least China called it out.
-25
Competitive-Ad-9404 May 4, 2026 -8
After Putin told Trump to attack Iran utilizing most of our missile stockpile,  China sees this as an opportunity to take Taiwan because we can't defend them. 
-8
[deleted] May 4, 2026 -34
[removed]
-34
Important-Emu-6691 May 4, 2026 -10
This is one of those things ccp spokesperson says something fairly benign in Chinese and western media decide to translate it into some giant story like the government issued an official decree labeling lai a rat
-10
← Back to Board