· 24 comments · Save ·
Announcements Mar 25, 2026 at 1:45 PM

Taxpayers spent thousands on hair, makeup and horses for Noem's DHS ad

Posted by kootles10


https://www.indystar.com/story/news/politics/2026/03/24/kristi-noem-homeland-security-ad-cost/89301114007/?tbref=hp&fbclid=IwdGRjcAQwxiljbGNrBDDGJ2V4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHhU1G5kg5absM7h_zQuMcJ4361FNoU0pDm6hI6pALr7hWvzFJCxCX0MSxuTH_aem_ss3CKeecs0ndtnnBJtJN-A

🚩 Report this post

24 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
steak1986 Mar 25, 2026 +11
Yeah i heard she didnt have to, and the crew protested, but she insisted on putting each horse down herself between takes
11
Clarkelthekat Mar 25, 2026 +2
I actually heard the horses disarmed her and offed themselves after finding out it was being featured in an AD with such an untamed and unsightly creature.
2
kootles10 Mar 25, 2026 +8
From the article: U.S. taxpayer dollars covered more than $286,000 on production costs for an anti-immigration ad featuring then-Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, according to expenses revealed by two lawmakers. Also, The Strategy Group, a Trump-allied subcontractor that created the $220 million commercial, spent more than $107,000 on labor costs, received a $60,000 "signing bonus" to produce the ad, and another $20,000 on horse rentals, Democratic Sens. Peter Welch of Vermont and Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut disclosed on March 23 as part of their ongoing investigation into the no-bid contract ad campaign. A subcontractor received a $60,000 signing bonus and spent $20,000 on horse rentals used for the ad. The grift is good, the grift is right- GOP motto
8
burnsie3435 Mar 25, 2026 +3
So $286,000 on production costs leaves $219,714,000 on corruption?
3
MentalDisintegrat1on Mar 26, 2026 +1
Have you seen her face? There's thousands of concealer alone to hide her hideous face.
1
Colonel-Mooseknuckle Mar 25, 2026 +3
I'm assuming 90% of it was Gollum's makeup.
3
naptown-hooly Mar 25, 2026 +3
I know right. Spackle by the gallon isn't c**** to cover up her acne scars.
3
godzillachilla Mar 25, 2026 +3
All that hair and makeup and she still looks like Burnt Racist Barbie
3
rvretiredlife Mar 25, 2026 +2
She should have to reimburse us that money.
2
Middle-Armadillo-660 Mar 25, 2026 +1
I would like that money back.
1
GatoLibre Mar 25, 2026 +1
DOGE is gonna be soooo mad.
1
uksid1976 Mar 25, 2026 +1
Those are some fancy horses.
1
Silent-Storms Mar 25, 2026 +1
I'm more concerned with how much taxpayer money was wasted so the secretary could f*** her boyfriend on the job.
1
mrFish852 Mar 25, 2026 +1
It would have been more efficient of the tax payers dollars to just put that makeup directly on the horse.  
1
mammongram6969 Mar 25, 2026 +1
Fix the stinking title - taxpayers didn't spend it, Kristy Noem spent it. Stop relieving her of responsibility.
1
BaconISgoodSOGOOD Mar 25, 2026 +1
The hair and makeup was of course, for those horses.
1
ConditionHoliday2844 Mar 25, 2026 -7
Drop in the bucket compared to all the self deportations and costs associated with it
-7
Main-Bandicoot6477 Mar 25, 2026 +3
Costs associated with what?
3
ConditionHoliday2844 Mar 25, 2026 -9
Healthcare, other benefits, hotels, food, crime, inflated home prices, jobs, and such. It’s billions and billion. Think ppl are just jealous of her tbh.
-9
Main-Bandicoot6477 Mar 25, 2026 +4
What are you talking about? What costs are incurred by who exactly?
4
ConditionHoliday2844 Mar 25, 2026 -9
Illegals silly
-9
Main-Bandicoot6477 Mar 25, 2026 +6
Oh, you're just inventing vague fake things to defend actual specific corruption from specific people. Got it.
6
ConditionHoliday2844 Mar 25, 2026 -2
Taxpayers
-2
bck1999 Mar 25, 2026 +2
R/thathappened
2
← Back to Board