Probably the point. Make Weatern countries more toxic and increase tensions, security budgets, and potential violent outcomes.
42
Current-Revenue-nowApr 28, 2026
+1
No. This will make the population be more against Iran and the support for the UK to support US aggression in Iran. So it does not make sense for Iran to actually want this to happen.
The UK already has issues with how they handle the illegal immigrants.
1
Not_Tom_JonesApr 28, 2026
+144
FWIW:
I think most Iranians in the UK are there *because* they fled this regime.
The embassy isn't rallying the diaspora, it's fishing for a tiny hardline fringe and identifying who's still loyal to Tehran.
The real question is why the UK still hasn't designated the IRGC as a terrorist organisation.
144
EquivalentOne241Apr 28, 2026
+44
Do you know kids and families of many IRGC officials live in the Western countries?
44
Every-Development398Apr 28, 2026
+45
same with china, hate the west publicly send all your kids and family there lol.
45
Bounty_hunter_Apr 28, 2026
+14
Like Putkin daughter living in Paris ?
14
Bitter-Train-5961Apr 28, 2026
+1
Yeah even Xi jinping's daughter studied in Harvard
1
notsocoolguy42Apr 28, 2026
+1
Where do you get the information that China hates the west? The only time their government make comments that are close to "hate" is when it's about Taiwan, even then it's closer to "Taiwan is a part of China" or something like that.
Chinese people also don't really hate the west either.
1
HockeyHockiApr 28, 2026
+1
The son of an IRGC official just assaulted their former crown prince in Germany
1
travestyofPeZApr 28, 2026
+1
I mean, let’s be real, *they* won’t be the ones required to martyr themselves. It’ll be the poor bastards without powerful connections.
1
medicatedadminApr 28, 2026
+1
As someone who has a number of iranian-migrant friends, i can say you are very likely correct. The IRGC has sewn such an insane level of paranoia amongst its people that even when an iranian ex-pat meets another on the other side of the world, they are instantly consumed by the thought that this new person might be an agent of their former overlords.
1
aviemzurApr 28, 2026
+1
Why do they have an Iranian embassy is another question.
1
Automata-OmniaApr 28, 2026
-8
Because unlike US diplomacy, normal countries maintain dialogue rather than bombing schools and late night twitter rants/threats.
-8
OkBuyer-Apr 28, 2026
+7
why did we bomb that school? was it close to a target of interest and ended up collateral?
7
philtjzApr 28, 2026
+1
From what I understand, the school building used to be part of an adjacent military base but was separated from it a few years ago and converted into a school. Both the school and the base next to it was targeted in the same strike, so it’s likely a case of outdated intelligence exacerbated by the use of AI in target selection without stringent human oversight.
1
OkBuyer-Apr 28, 2026
+1
so clankers saw the back rooms and noticed there was a threat there, too?
1
earazahsApr 28, 2026
+1
No, Ai likely saw that it had a target designation and put it on a list. No human double checked the list to see the target was deprecated.
1
nerdyPagamanApr 28, 2026
+2
I suspect that an AI targeting system fucked up.
2
aviemzurApr 28, 2026
+1
Something, something.. von Clausewitz.
1
Remote_Reality_6235Apr 28, 2026
-18
Then the IDF and while you're at it the US military should have been declared terrorist when they murdered 1 million civilians in Iraq. Shit they would need to declare themselves terrorists for what they did in India, Ireland and Palestien to name a few.
-18
foopirataApr 28, 2026
+1
The IDF was active in Iraq, India and Ireland?
Were they in the "I" page of the atlas at the time?
Is the IDF in the room with you right now?
1
otclogicApr 28, 2026
+1
When did the US murder 1 million civilians in Iraq?
1
cyberianscribeApr 28, 2026
+1
The UK government is set to officially define the IRGC as a terrorist organisation (in July). Given the extensive and powerful network that that regime has been allowed to build in The UK over decades - all people connected to or who are part of that network in The UK stand to lose a great deal. I think this call for sacrifice, by the regime, is a desperate reaction to their imminent definition as a terrorist organisation.
1
misnomer88Apr 28, 2026
+1
But why is it taking so long to proscribe it? We’re not just lagging behind the US here, we’re lagging behind the EU which proscribed it months ago.
1
cyberianscribeApr 28, 2026
+1
The network the regime built in The UK is the most powerful and influential amongst all its other networks in other countries - extending into the political realm via its lobbying elements.
1
scrambledhelixApr 28, 2026
+1
> The UK government is set to officially define the IRGC as a terrorist organisation (in July).
What took them so long?
1
cyberianscribeApr 28, 2026
+1
The network the regime built in The UK is the most powerful and influential amongst all its other networks in other countries - extending into the political realm via its lobbying elements.
1
BetSquare7190Apr 28, 2026
+54
Probably with the full support of the "Globalize the Intifada" useful idiots, who rooted for Hamas and Hezbollah.
Perhaps some will change their tune when experience Islamic terrorism more directly.
54
ApologiseMeowMeowApr 28, 2026
+12
Not a chance they've already convinced themselves that these terrorist are just suppressed people. Just look at how these people react to none Israel Jews living in the UK who have been targeted, they are all guilty by association.
12
Shawn_The_Sheep777Apr 28, 2026
+12
I’d shut the Iranian and Russian embassies. They are just control centres for spying and terrorism.
12
northbayyApr 28, 2026
+1
I assume that in some ways, that’s useful to know
1
Shawn_The_Sheep777Apr 28, 2026
+1
Im sure there are legitimate reasons why they don’t but I do wonder if they outweigh the benefits of closing them down.
1
northbayyApr 28, 2026
+1
I’m just one of your ignorant cousins from the other side of the pond so I don’t know the answer to this, but do their delegates ever get called before parliament or anything?
1
Street_AnonApr 28, 2026
+1
There is a reason why the vast majority of Iranians leave Iran and it is the regime and they are not going to help them
1
therealallproApr 28, 2026
+1
This isn’t possible Listnook told me Trump was bad guy and that’s ALL THAT MATTERED.
1
Due_Ad_3200Apr 28, 2026
+1
The Iranian regime is bad
https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2026/01/iran-massacre-of-protesters-demands-global-diplomatic-action-to-signal-an-end-to-impunity/
Trump appears to be waging war without a proper plan for ending the war.
These can both be true.
1
CorgiKnightStudiosApr 28, 2026
+1
This is the situation eveyone was TRYING to avoid.
1
Ro-ftwApr 28, 2026
+1
I mean, f*** the Islamic Republic and the IRGC and I hope the US/Israel resume the process of wiping them off the earth, but this is just a stupid word by word translation issue. The "Jaan Fada" initiative is something the Islamic Republic started in Iran to recruit people from the general public to join the army/IRGC to defend Iran. It's more of a PR stunt tbh because they're just inflating the numbers on the system by publishing fake numbers or using bots and stuff.
The direct translation is "one who sacrifices their life" but it doesn't mean they're suicide bombers - it's just the Persian language being over dramatic.
Assuming the embassy in London is just trying to get some more people to go sign up on the online system so they can brag about it to the media...
1
Lets_getouttahereApr 28, 2026
+1
It's only for PR as long as no one signs up or adheres to the orders/wishes of the Islamic Republic.
To say the Islamic Republic uses its foot soldiers only to "defend" would be disingenuous.
"Defense" is how they try to sell it internally, but look at the Iran-Iraq war, when Khomeini rejected a truce offer two years into the war, and sent hundreds of thousands of Iranians to their death, because "The Road to Jerusalem Passes Through Karbala".
1
Street_AnonApr 28, 2026
+1
Iran could appeal to Western Far leftists, they would something like this
1
FatefulDonkeyApr 28, 2026
+1
And then people defend Iran..
1
JeelyPieceApr 28, 2026
+3
I guess that "fighting aged men" theory's going to be put to the test, then, eh?
3
tupe12Apr 28, 2026
+1
Sounds like an abuse of diplomatic privileges
1
skynet345Apr 28, 2026
+1
They’re intentionally going after the UK and not the US or Saudi UAE because they know UK is the weakest link politically, and the one least likely to hit back
1
GackeyApr 28, 2026
+1
UK when Ukraine calls for refugees to return to the country to defend against a genocidal invasion: 😁
UK when Iran calls refugees to return to the country to defend against a genocidal invasion: 😡
1
Personal-Fix-2713Apr 28, 2026
-11
Iran currently has (most) of the world's support, why would it want to change that.
-11
Less-Most-2861Apr 28, 2026
+1
Sympathyzing with the Iranian side more than with the American side in the current conflict and admiring/supporting the iranian regime are different things. Many people who sympathize with iran are also secular progressive leftists, and they obviously wouldn't admire the conservative right-wing theocratic government of iran where executions are common and the punishment for same-sex relationships is death.
1
scrambledhelixApr 28, 2026
+1
> Many people who sympathize with iran are also secular progressive leftists
Wearing a pin to support a cause you nothing about isn't a political position, it's a show of compliance.
50 Comments