· 199 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 25, 2026 at 1:56 AM

‘The damage is done’: global oil crisis has changed fossil fuel industry for ever, IEA chief says | Oil

Posted by iwantboringtimes


‘The damage is done’: global oil crisis has changed fossil fuel industry for ever, IEA chief says
the Guardian
‘The damage is done’: global oil crisis has changed fossil fuel industry for ever, IEA chief says
Exclusive: International Energy Agency’s Fatih Birol, the world’s leading energy economist, also says UK should largely forgo North Sea expansion

🚩 Report this post

199 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
Smartimess 17 hr ago +3122
It‘s ironic that the oil lobby spent hundreds of millions to get Trump elected because they thought that this a****** would delay the transformation to EVs, heat pumps and renewables.
3122
No-Profession5134 17 hr ago +1447
All of which for geopolitical reasons every country on Earth should have been speedrunning to get. Getting off Oil weakens Terrorist and Warmongering countries period.... This should have been mentioned and pushed hard 20 years ago.
1447
TheSonar 16 hr ago +629
It was. Extensively. But politicians happily take money over most "potentially serious threats."
629
asethskyr 16 hr ago +423
That timeline was diverted by Bush v. Gore in 2000.
423
syhr_ryhs 13 hr ago +40
Of whom three of Bush's lawyers in that case are now supreme court justices.
40
DrXaos 13 hr ago +130
split between United Federation of Planets timeline and Terran Empire timeline.
130
JayJay_90 12 hr ago +81
Or between United Federation of Planets timeline and Great Filter timeline.
81
ArthurStevensNZ 8 hr ago +51
I am convinced that greedy power and money hoarding people are the final filter. We’ve had technology to ensure our survival for hundreds if not thousands of years, but these greedy mentally ill people (hoarding money / power is no different to hoarding cats, or trash) could be the undoing of our species.
51
AlwaysShittyKnsasCty 8 hr ago +25
I honestly don’t understand why drug addicts are treated like absolute shit by society and let to rot in the street, but we not only allow billionaires to hoard the wealth of nations (literally), we actively encourage it and f****** congratulate them. Capitalists, make it make f****** sense.
25
me34343 8 hr ago +11
The difference is it hurts people and idolized by millions
11
Averagelytalldude 11 hr ago +14
Can I get an Isaac Arthur episode on this?”The Fermi Paradox: Oil Lobby”
14
Artifexa 9 hr ago +8
Isaac Arthur is pretty much a "turbo-capitalist", "don't thread on me", "tech-optimist" liberal. He probably voted for Trump, 3 times. Don't expect him to do an episode where "human corruption fostered by unfettered capitalism" gets us to the great filter.
8
jollyreaper2112 6 hr ago +1
Well that's disappointing. Like finding out who shad was with shadiversity.
1
epage 6 hr ago +1
> He probably voted for Trump, 3 times. Could be worst; could be one of those people who voted for him more than 3 times (illegally).
1
oftenInabbrobriate 12 hr ago +24
Oh I don’t think so. In the Star Trek universe there was also that one f****** big war, only afterward did humanity move more together in that universe
24
clarkrd 12 hr ago +24
A timeline divergence happened on April 22, 2005 when Enterprise aired the [opening titles](https://youtu.be/sfbsZRbwbJ4?si=IPJvVMYOnqc87UBF) of "In a Mirror, Darkly" *sent from my clarkrd-Jurati Borg using Tapatalk*
24
DillBagner 9 hr ago +6
That war started in 2026...
6
Safe-Razzmatazz3982 12 hr ago +3
More like United Federation of Planets and Mad Max.
3
Eastern_Hornet_6432 12 hr ago +16
It really will be a question for the ages, how the world would have turned out had Gore won.
16
ComfyFrog 13 hr ago +43
Germany is still clinging to fossil fuels. We are even hiding reports of how good renewables are.
43
BasvanS 10 hr ago +40
Elect conservative assholes and this is what you get 🤷
40
ComfyFrog 9 hr ago +21
Old people vote CDU because that's what they always voted, young adults vote Afd because social media propaganda is working :) I'm caught in the middle.
21
BasvanS 8 hr ago +5
Yeah, I figured this wasn’t a surprise to you
5
Shiriru00 11 hr ago +17
I mean all of this was already known back in 1996 when I started to pay attention and well before that too. But doctors knew that tobacco was bad for you for decades before anything was done to address it. And the tobacco industry had a tiny fraction of the power the oil industry has.
17
crunknessmonster 11 hr ago +8
I swear not nearly enough people are thinking about it this way.
8
Switch_Off 10 hr ago +4
American Empire depends on oil. The last thing that institutions of America want is worldwide energy independence.
4
Tight_Jellyfish_349 7 hr ago +1
Inconvenient Truth. Maybe Al Gore was right.
1
DrXaos 13 hr ago +49
the oil lobby doesn't own oil in the Gulf. They own oil that competes with that oil and now earns a higher profit. They got way more than they put in.
49
garanvor 8 hr ago +21
On the short term. The whole point of the article is that on the long term humanity is finally moving off oil.
21
ArgentScourge 6 hr ago +1
Yes, but remember that the whole point of corporations is to increase value for the share holders **this quarter**. "The line goes up" is their raison d'être fulfilled.
1
Status-Secret-4292 16 hr ago +125
Oh he tried for them, but they picked the dude that bankrupts casinos. Honestly, whatever the man intends to do he successfully fails in the other direction every time. And the success is just other people bailing him out, first his dad and his associates, then he was just entrenched enough that in was always in the interest of someone to bail him out for their own ends. He must be in so many people's pockets
125
LambdaLambo 17 hr ago +30
Well this war is also a boon to American fossil fuels since it’s the one source in the world that cannot be bombed.
30
geo_prog 7 hr ago +1
No. Oil shocks like this result in demand collapse. I work in the Canadian oil and gas industry and internal analysts are preparing for one big flurry of activity then a cataclysmic retraction in the industry. We’ve never seen these kinds of price discrepancies between physical oil for delivery and paper oil. Someone somewhere is doing all they can to keep oil futures suppressed. For example, in the 1974-80 oil shock physical oil for delivery and oil futures prices were within about 5% of each other. That means the price the market thought people would pay for oil was pretty close to what they would pay for oil. Right now physical oil for delivery is selling at 50-60% more than the current futures price. When those contracts come due there is likely going to be a massive short squeeze (possibly as early as May) and energy prices are going to skyrocket. This is thought to be heading towards a massive global recession which is really not good for oil companies in the medium term.
1
banned4violence 12 hr ago +14
Ukranian drones have disproved that something can’t be bombed.
14
Nice_Reading5272 11 hr ago +13
Low cost drones aren't making it over the atlantic and pacific ocean..
13
lloveliet 10 hr ago +11
yet
11
AreWeNotDoinPhrasing 8 hr ago +4
honestly who is to say some of those fancy shipping containers they used in that massive surprise Russian bombing aren't already in the states. Not saying Ukraine put them here, but tons of other countries could theoretically already have some here.
4
Mudfry 9 hr ago +2
That’s just a way to say energy prices are going to increase.
2
Plaineswalker 16 hr ago +48
US oil is doing great. Production is booming and now their profits are WAY up! Almost like that was the plan....
48
BoringRedHorse 15 hr ago +12
They embraced Trump, only to find out that everything Trump touches turns to sh\*t!!
12
snoosh00 9 hr ago +6
I think it's possible (or likely) that the people who lobbied are totally fine with this price hike. They know the switch to EVs and everything was going to happen eventually, why not try to squeeze the world one last time while we're still stuck with oil as a main source. But I don't think the administration thought of a single knock on effect from anything they've done And all I have to ask is "do you think the United States is going to continue building more fossil fuel powerplants? Or will this actually increase nuclear adoption.
6
CucumberError 12 hr ago +4
Just like the only people that buy a Tesla now would have never even entertained the idea of buying a EV a decade ago. Are they actually playing like 7D chess?
4
TheSteakPie 12 hr ago +10
Exactlly 12 months ago I said I would never have a electric car, yesterday I ordered my first! And of course I can tell you one brand that would have and always will be excluded and and it begins with a T.
10
Amazing_Athlete_2265 11 hr ago +7
Welcome to a world without spark plugs getting fowled, no more oil changes, no more air filter changes, no more timing chain replacements, no more blown cylinder head gaskets...
7
tsraq 10 hr ago +4
> spark plugs getting **fowled**, I know that's a typo but damn the mental image...
4
chocolatechipbagels 14 hr ago +8
oil lobbies love trump right now. demand has not gone anywhere but the price is through the roof
8
Nice_Reading5272 11 hr ago +2
All oil companies that produce in the US are making gigantic profits off of the increased price, this also makes a strong business case for immediate development which was declining due to low cost per barrel. Even if this manages to accelerate renewables by actual need, I don't think they mind in the short to medium term.
2
iwantboringtimes 18 hr ago +1531
(from the article) > Speaking exclusively to the Guardian, Birol said a key effect of the US-Israel war on Iran was that countries would lose trust in fossil fuels and demand for them would reduce. > “Their perception of risk and reliability will change. Governments will review their energy strategies. There will be a significant boost to renewables and nuclear power and a further shift towards a more electrified future,” he said. “And this will cut into the main markets for oil.” > Birol said there was no going back from the crisis: “The vase is broken, the damage is done – it will be very difficult to put the pieces back together. This will have permanent consequences for the global energy markets for years to come.”
1531
NearsightedNomad 18 hr ago +258
If only climate activists knew that the answer on how to get industries to pursue renewables was to invade Iran. They could have an unholy alliance with the neocons.
258
Joshau-k 15 hr ago +62
There's some strategies that the climate movement is too idealistic to try. Particularly when it comes to engaging conservatives. If you 1. Painted foreign emissions as a harm against your nation  2. Ignored domestic emissions  3. Ignored foreign emissions from oil exports With the right communication strategy you could engage Republicans on climate change. Isolationists and nationalists, currently can't comprehend the issue of climate change because all the current policies assume global trust and cooperation.  If you lack this trust, domestic first climate policy does not have expected economic net positive returns - just costs without benefits.  This is why fossil fuel propaganda explaining it away as a globalist conspiracy theory is so persuasive to them. The Climate movement has zero plan for a situation of deteriorating trust between nations. Trust is key to the Paris agreement as there are no consequences. A low trust world requires consequences first. And if the big 3 (US, EU, China) start punishing nations for the real harm from emissions that could be a much more reliable path to change. Even ignoring their own emissions, they will hold each others emissions to account with consequences.
62
Sonofbluekane 13 hr ago +15
So green/environmental imperialism rather than pink/feminist imperialism?
15
thepatterninchaos 6 hr ago +1
I love this
1
Sylvanussr 15 hr ago +12
I’ve heard it as a thought experiment before that if the US wanted to really go all out to stop climate change, they could just start bombing all the oil infrastructure. But of course that would be crazy.
12
Nice_Reading5272 10 hr ago +4
A Carbon Tax is essentially the same idea, raise the price of fossil fuels artificially to make renewables more attractive.
4
GoblinDiplomat 18 hr ago +2943
It would be pretty hilarious if the shit gibbons accidentally saved the world from climate change.
2943
Embarrassed_Quit_450 17 hr ago +780
Give him a Nobel prize for climate activism.
780
Status-Secret-4292 16 hr ago +149
That would be genuinely hilarious to watch. He would be so proud to get it. Then everyone who supports him would be angry and conflicted. For like a week... then suddenly be helping solve it under whatever different bull shit reason dude gives.
149
Black_Moons 16 hr ago +60
Whatever gets maga into a EV is fine. Even if its some shitty tesla. At least then elon wouldn't have to sell them all to the government/spaceX to rot in some parking lot as part of his kickbacks, taken from everyones taxes.
60
mhornberger 12 hr ago +12
Yep, even if their politics are, well, deplorable, displacing fossil fuel demand is key. It pisses many people off, but I'd rather a given dollar go to Tesla than to Exxon. Yes, other BEV options exist, as does mass transit, as do bicycles, but *given that choice*, I'd rather a dollar go to Tesla than to Exxon.
12
Black_Moons 12 hr ago +5
Given the choice between a maga spending $100,000 on a shitler car and everyone else being forced to spend $100,000 of their tax money on a shitler car and not even get to drive it, Id rather only the dumb people have to suffer being out $100,000 for a shitty car. Plus at least someone would drive the damn thing rather then have it rot away in a parking lot as a government kickback. A waste of resources is still a waste of resources at the end of the day, the least you can do is try to make some use of it before sending it off to be recycled.
5
Eastern_Hornet_6432 12 hr ago +3
>Whatever gets maga into a EV is fine I dunno; I suspect that rewarding him for starting a dumb war would not lead to good outcomes, even if the first dumb war accidentally did.
3
Health_throwaway__ 13 hr ago +8
Nobody likes oil, too old, BLACK. Batteries are money, BIG money.
8
mechalenchon 17 hr ago +126
Just ask FIFA
126
marmaladecorgi 17 hr ago +86
"The FIFA Climate Champion Medal" has a nice ring to it, TBF.
86
CO_Golf13 17 hr ago +160
"The Gang Solves Global Warming"
160
PropaneMilo 16 hr ago +31
My administration has brokered a peace deal. So anyway, I started blasting.
31
Bbbbhazit 17 hr ago +61
"Clean coal" I will never forget him saying that from his first term disparaging renewable energy resources.
61
Carlitos96 16 hr ago +27
“Our clean, beautiful coal” I just bursted out laughing when he said that.
27
Any_Consequence_8738 16 hr ago +11
He talked about saving a “ Clean Coal” plant in PA this week
11
HankHillbwhaa 16 hr ago +10
the cleanest coal around they say, I came, they were washing it with dawn dish soap before loading it into the furnace. It was a magnificient furnace, hot, some say the hottest around. In the world that is. America builds them the hottest because we're the hottest place right now.
10
DEEP_HURTING 15 hr ago +6
My favorite factoid about the US coal industry is how more people are employed in theater.
6
440ish 10 hr ago +3
Fun Fact: Coal consumption at US coal-fired power plants was down 12% YoY in January.
3
Lakefish_ 15 hr ago +16
Biblical antichrist behavior, afaik, summarized: "f*** up so bad, people change for the better to avoid it happening again"
16
steve_of 16 hr ago +21
All the oil CEOs that funded trump will be creaming their pants at the moment. Two interdependent reasons. First they are making bank in the short term and second they dont give a f*** about the long term. 12 months is an eternity to these fucks and it will be way longer than 12 months before the oil markets return to 'normal'.
21
iwantboringtimes 15 hr ago +13
Some governments are pressuring oil companies to lower their profits. Energy is too crucial for quite a number of politicians to be A-OK with blatant profiteering during an energy crisis.
13
batteryservice 18 hr ago +58
It really has been that 4D chess stuff maybe? Hahaha wouldn’t that be the kicker to the to 2020s.
58
Ithinkibrokethis 17 hr ago +15
4d candyland.
15
Happy_Peak_7818 16 hr ago +4
4D McDonald's Monopoly 
4
octopusboots 17 hr ago +6
I just will leave this here. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_old\_man\_lost\_his\_horse](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_old_man_lost_his_horse)
6
RarelyReadReplies 18 hr ago +20
You're not implying there's any world where Trump did this on purpose right? The 4D chess part threw me, like you're saying he intended this.
20
RyanNotBrian 18 hr ago +32
They're saying it would be funny if.
32
Disastrous_Fig5609 18 hr ago +11
Maybe 10 years ago, not so much now.
11
Painwracker_Oni 17 hr ago +6
Maybe the dementia has gotten to the point where he’s so far gone that he’s unintentionally making good decision for the world?
6
Ok-Blood4340 17 hr ago +9
Theoretically, a monkey on a long enough timeline could make the complete works of Shakespeare on a typewriter entirely by accident. Even this administration could make enough random decisions that one of them inadvertently creates some good.
9
twoworldman 17 hr ago +7
Tbf, a monkey hammering away on a typewriter would be more competent at its job than half of Trump's government.
7
whytwu1f 15 hr ago +13
I have this personal headcanon conspiracy theory that trump saw the future, knew what he needed to do, and chose to become the most hated man in the world because it was the only way to save the species. (Please, I'm desperate for some logical explanation other than "49 percent of voters are racist transphobes".)
13
SterlingMallory 15 hr ago +18
Lisan al gaib
18
CliftonForce 14 hr ago +5
I keep thinking of the science fiction trope of multiple time travelers going back to the same point to try and prevent some disaster. But every trip just makes it worse. We need to find the lab that keeps sending folks back to 2016 and STOP THEM.
5
AndyTheSane 14 hr ago +3
Trump, his consciousness transferred to a Commodore 64, is now Cyber Dictator For All Eternity
3
Frozenfire21 17 hr ago +10
Optimistic of you to not see it’s too late
10
ku2000 17 hr ago +20
I would still take better late than never
20
Frozenfire21 17 hr ago +6
Don’t disagree, but the long standing damage is done, all we can do is slightly mitigate how bad it will get
6
LambdaLambo 17 hr ago +9
It’s absolutely not too late. I mean f***, we served the black plague as a species, and other very horrific events. We’re not just gonna get to net zero, eventually with carbon capture we’ll even restore the co2 concentration to normal levels.
9
Frozenfire21 17 hr ago +9
Too late to stop some of the worst possible outcomes? Yes it’s likely far too late, the feedback loops have begun
9
iwantboringtimes 15 hr ago +6
Think of it this way. Feeling demoralized is blah feeling. Doesn't do your health any good. Best temper it by focusing on silver linings. 'Sides, I got work to do. It's easier to get work done when there's a light at the end of the tunnel to focus on.
6
Choice_Past7399 17 hr ago +3
Trump finally doing something right for the wrong reasons.
3
KaliUK 16 hr ago +3
It did, green energy is now the leading supplier of energy. The old world is dying, this is its gasping breath. The petrodollar will break the house of cards.
3
LovesRetribution 15 hr ago +3
Often times you meet your destiny on the path you took to avoid it.
3
____DEADPOOL_______ 15 hr ago +3
I'm ready to forgive all the insults, the gaslighting, the stress, and all the crazy and corrupt shit if they actually resolve the climate crisis. I think that fumbling covid and the greed that came behind it was great for climate change. People are traveling less, consuming less because everything is so crazy expensive, etc.
3
self-recursion-robot 18 hr ago +6
I’m sure the Trump family is leaning heavily into nuclear and this is all part of the money making plan
6
ThatsItImOverThis 16 hr ago +2
That would have made a great Simpson’s episode.
2
prettyfuckingimmoral 15 hr ago +2
Game theory in action. Your opponent gets something they want. You still win.
2
SNRatio 18 hr ago +87
I've been telling people that Trump's efforts to get so many people worldwide to adopt solar makes him the greenest president we've ever had. No one is particularly pleased when I say that, but they don't say I'm wrong.
87
Carrera_996 17 hr ago +46
AI is driving renewable like crazy. After most of them go bankrupt everyone will have super c**** power.
46
uprislng 16 hr ago +9
I don't think it counts when it's both not on purpose and they're killing green investment here in the US where we're going to get left way the f*** behind in c**** energy infrastructure right when (if you believe the hype) the AI revolution is going to put more of us out of jobs while also increasing our energy demands and therefore costs.
9
CanaryPutrid1334 17 hr ago +8
Nothing in this f****** universe could make him the… jesus I can’t even type it. THAT.
8
tolacid 17 hr ago +8
GREENest, not *great*est
8
CanaryPutrid1334 17 hr ago +4
I know. Windmill cancer, killing whales… this m*********** hates anything green except the almighty dollar.
4
tolacid 17 hr ago +12
Look, he may be doing it accidentally and even against his explicit will, but it can't be denied that he's directly causing significant progress towards green-ness.
12
TheElusiveFox 16 hr ago +6
I honestly think nuclear is a more reasonable alternative to oil than solar in most places, and honestly I can see a lot of countries pushing their nuclear programs forward more now too because the other thing trump is doing is showing that the U.S. cannot be trusted as an ally.
6
binzoma 16 hr ago +11
huh. I'm shocked countries would consider energy supply security to be of critical national importance! its almost as if there had been a psy-op against that since the 1970s the whole idea that 'nuclear is bad/dangerous'. lmao. pre brexit/trump that was the best intelligence operation against the west post ww2
11
RenderedMeat 17 hr ago +5
Except in the US, where it’s full ~~steam~~ gas/coal/oil ahead!
5
ConstableAssButt 16 hr ago +3
A three week price hike isn't going to be what's killed oil. It's the last 30 years of labor to move the world toward renewables.
3
TheTrollerOfTrolls 17 hr ago +445
>This crisis was “bigger than all the biggest crises combined, and therefore huge”, he said. What a perspective to have.
445
hadrian_afer 17 hr ago +63
I had a laugh too, when I read it.
63
KomorebiParticle 16 hr ago +42
👐 bigly crisis 👐
42
PluotFinnegan_IV 13 hr ago +12
some might even call it yuge
12
InconspicuousRadish 13 hr ago +4
The bigliest!
4
OddOnion_ 14 hr ago +9
2 Crisis 2 Crisiser
9
QueezyF 12 hr ago +6
It was like, fifteen 9/11s
6
PorkProofPrion 17 hr ago +133
Would be hilarious if some group would award Trump with some kind of honorary award for advancing renewables. Wonder if he would show up
133
__Yakovlev__ 13 hr ago +28
I can't wait for trump to receive the Greenpeace green peace award
28
Phugasity 9 hr ago +3
If they hit some bigger fishing boats, I could see this happening.
3
[deleted] 17 hr ago +409
[removed]
409
PretendSet9704 16 hr ago +80
He's also assisting countries with diversifying their trade! Look at Canada for instance, he wants us to partner with the EU & China! Best president ever! /s
80
Araminal 16 hr ago +35
It would be wonderful if Greta Thunberg dedicated a climate change award to him.
35
lordlestar 15 hr ago +4
Greta is demanding trump to send oil to cuba, what strange times we live in
4
Own_Emergency53 16 hr ago +4
I think this too. He's a low key Greenie, I'm sure of it.  He's doing an epic job of getting the planet off it's oil addiction.
4
RaccoonWannabe 16 hr ago +7
5D-chess
7
FeatureSeparate404 18 hr ago +397
And just think, president dingleberry killed renewables in the US just before this crisis.
397
salween_river 18 hr ago +186
Well, he tried. The courts have been busy unkilling them.
186
Ntroepy 16 hr ago +82
Most major car manufactures in the US have taken multi-billion dollar write offs on their EV investments as they’ve rolled back to a more gas and hybrid approach. Whatever the court decide, they aren’t going back anytime soon. This will set the US EV market back 10+ years - which is a lifetime these days.
82
Ok-Leader-1824 14 hr ago +27
That's just cars, which have to be mobile. Grid powering infrastructure does not have to move. Solar is going up up.
27
kelldricked 9 hr ago +3
Still the delay will be felt. Hell US infrastructure is already behind on most of the develop world.
3
Plastic-Fox0293 10 hr ago +5
And yet the most wanted thing by the global driving community is for the US auto makers to stop making so we can all just buy the better chinese cars. 
5
smellmyfingerplz 17 hr ago +33
Inflation reduction act tax credits were gutted, you no longer get a $7500 deduction for buying a new electric car
33
takeda64 16 hr ago +9
In his infinite genius he made them unnecessary. With current prices (and they supposed to go up even more now, as the lest prewar shipments just got delivered) you won't need the credit to get a strong motivation to buy EV.
9
LogicProfessor 16 hr ago +6
Buy used and it's almost 50% off.
6
One-Earth9294 15 hr ago +21
It's almost like he's trying to destroy the US just like many of us warned he would try to do.
21
Odd-Song5052 11 hr ago +2
His goal has obviously been treasonous sabotage since the first term but nobody ever seems to put two and two together. 
2
Latrodectus702 17 hr ago +61
Monkeys paw wish. End the reliance on fossil fuels forever. Trump gets the credit for saving the world…
61
space_tardigrades 17 hr ago +26
Monkeys paw curls, entire world switches to solar just before nuclear winter renders it useless.
26
ajicrystal 18 hr ago +186
The stable genius promoting alternatives to fossil fuels wasnt on my bingo card for 2026
186
SmegmaWarrior0815 17 hr ago +86
In a weird twisted way he is a blessing for Europe. Finally have to invest in independence from the US in energy, military, tech and economy. Hell, some nations even want their own nukes now.
86
swizzlewizzle 15 hr ago +14
Honestly.. yea.. trump was the crisis that ripped off the mask of the US being a reliable partner
14
PluotFinnegan_IV 13 hr ago +17
TBF, the US was a reliable partner pre 2015. R or D, both parties were reliable, understood the value of NATO, and recognized the value of their relationships around the world. Trump has never built a symbiotic business or political relationship. It's all transactional with him, and only if he believes it's wildly in his favor.
17
Thoroughaway008 18 hr ago +19
But I am beyond thrilled about this 🤩 
19
takeda64 16 hr ago +2
What sucks is the transformation will be just far more painful that was needed) EU and states like California had deadline set up as 2035, with how things are, now the ideal time would be 2025.
2
Comprehensive-Bag-34 17 hr ago +17
The silver lining
17
Tutorbin76 16 hr ago +14
We can only hope. It should now be a high priority in all of our lives to make sure we give these vultures as little of our hard-earned money as possible.
14
StaticSystemShock 14 hr ago +31
I mean, closure of a single strait affecting entire world, kinda shows the problem right there.
31
DaemonCRO 11 hr ago +11
Probably half of my friends are in the process of installing solar arrays and buying EVs. Some have installs this weekend, some over the next week. Used EV market is on fire at the moment, everyone buying whatever they can at a large d******* from retail prices of new cars. These baboons will solve climate change unintentionally.
11
512165381 14 hr ago +10
Australia is now getting oil from Mexico, Argentina, Algeria, Nigeria & Norway. All these new-found friends.
10
Defiant-Traffic5801 17 hr ago +13
The IEA "... provide authoritative analysis, data, policy recommendations and solutions to ensure energy security and help the world transition to clean energy ", so he is quite simply promoting his organisation 's mission. Whether that has anything to do with reality is another matter.
13
obi_wan_the_phony 17 hr ago +15
The IEA has honestly lost its credibility when it comes to long term forecasting. For those of us in the energy industry, even for those who are agnostic on conventional or renewable energy it’s hard to take their projections seriously.
15
G00b3rb0y 15 hr ago +3
How? My country is cutting back on domestic flights because of price and availability concerns. There’s visible demand destruction taking place
3
Bakedfresh420 16 hr ago +10
Childish Gambino: Good.
10
lykkyluke 14 hr ago +12
Lol, this is so hilarious if you think what Drump has done. Trying to destroy green energy inustry, and started this irrational war. If this eventually destroys oil business, lol that's karma talking. Everything in this f****** war has turned against him.
12
rithrawr 10 hr ago +2
He wants to destroy green energy because those wind turbine off the coast was blocking his golf site view. Trump is a selfish prick. EV sale in the USA is down because they removed the rebate. Idiots will point out why gov have to subsidize EV when fossil fuel industry have tons of subsidies.
2
One-Earth9294 15 hr ago +5
I need you to have the balls and say why that is. "Because Donald Trump is a madman and an idiot" F****** say it.
5
peidinho31 10 hr ago +6
Its called the Mierdas Touch. Whatever Donnie touches, turns into shit
6
Boring-Location6800 9 hr ago +6
Except for Germany, where that absolute imbecile of a minister for economics pushes back solar and calls for domestic fracking. It's so stupid you couldn't make that shit up.
6
philenzed 15 hr ago +5
It's all wind farms from here, Trump
5
ken_the_boxer 14 hr ago +8
We can use former golf courses for that.
8
SophieEatsCake 10 hr ago +4
Solar Solar Solar…
4
Varorson 14 hr ago +7
If it results in electric vehicles, renewable energy, and better public transportation, I'm fine with that. It'll only be an issue if Donald, in his madness, actively blocks all of that as well, forcing countless companies to go bankrupt as they cannot afford switching to alternatives from oil.
7
EppingMarky 16 hr ago +5
Elon would be sitting on double hand he not personally ducked the Tesla brand.
5
Supercereal69 14 hr ago +7
F*** that nazi
7
omnibossk 11 hr ago +4
I’m not going back to fossile fuel cars unless someone tortures me and my wallet. Especially with oil coming from dictator states
4
thirstyrobot 10 hr ago +2
Canada?
2
Xygen8 9 hr ago +4
Not damage. Progress.
4
GGuts 7 hr ago +4
I think Trump is the greatest idiot that has ever lived. His idiocy has had the most influence on the world of all the idiots.
4
jakgal04 7 hr ago +1
Who would have thought that Trump would be the push for EV’s!
1
M0nk3yDLufffy 6 hr ago +1
Good as far as I see it the future is ev, the amount of people that I have seen use e-bikes has skyrocketed, with a speed of up to 40 mph and a range of 50 miles , why wouldn’t people use it , no expensive car payments no high gas price and for $500 you can modify any bike to be an e-bike with a charge time of 3-5 hours
1
blahblahblah_meto 15 hr ago +8
He’s not wrong.  My wife and I are recent  former BMW / 4Runner owners who sold one and had a new F150 on order we were trading in for.  We cancelled the order and bought a Kia EV 2wks ago.  2wks in and we’ll never go back. 
8
RR-- 12 hr ago +3
Kia EV is quite the shift from an F150. Any reason you didn't go for an F150 Lightning instead?
3
juhamac 11 hr ago +5
Maybe because it was discontinued? [https://www.npr.org/2025/12/15/nx-s1-5645147/ford-discontinues-all-electric-f-150-lightning](https://www.npr.org/2025/12/15/nx-s1-5645147/ford-discontinues-all-electric-f-150-lightning)
5
Great-Rest7878 11 hr ago +4
Probably realized like many do, not everyone needs a truck.
4
DaemonG 16 hr ago +7
i mean. yeah. the oil crises of the 70s were the death of heavy industry as we knew it and the beginning of modern fuel economy in cars. and that was a smaller reduction in oil on the market.
7
-HealingNoises- 15 hr ago +3
It is in the firm estimates that it will take up to 6 months to remove the mines. starting, when there is a complete cease in hostilities. And any of the oil and gas facilities which have been anything more than lightly damaged will take multiple years to be brought back online. It's done, no way out, we have to learn to conserve, reuse and recycle all the while doing without a whole lot of things which can not be created or at least reasonably without oil and it's byproducts.
3
Kashawinshky 7 hr ago +1
We'll see. In the 70s everyone said the same thing after the oil crisis. This does feel different though, as the biggest marker--competition--is already in full swing in the clean energy market.
1
jeffreyrufino 6 hr ago +1
This feels like a long-term shift away from fossil fuels driven by risk and reliability, not just climate policy anymore.
1
mammaube 14 hr ago +5
Will this push the US actually fund public transit again and create protected bike lanes?? Id l9ve it if this pushes train travel.
5
viptattoo 14 hr ago +6
F*** the fossil fuel industry.
6
Scoutmaster-Jedi 16 hr ago +4
The clear damaged done To the reputation of oil is a good thing for the world. The faster the would can transition away from oil and gas, the better. Better for health, better for economy, for environment, for self-reliance, for sustainability, for world peace, etc.
4
LabRatsAteMyHomework 16 hr ago +2
I almost wonder if Elon put him up to this.
2
KeyAny3800 16 hr ago +2
Hope the world move towards green energy at wartime pace
2
A_Pointy_Rock 15 hr ago +2
*Donald Trump - the president that kick-started renewables.*
2
Aerchaiz 14 hr ago +2
Crash, baby!
2
burtgummer45 14 hr ago +2
What nonsense. All that's different now is SA needs to build some pipelines across the desert and Iran just gave the world another reason to regime change it.
2
Odd-Song5052 11 hr ago +2
F*** headlines and their writers referring to “the global oil crisis” as if it just kinda happened for reasons. 
2
Impossible_Pie4091 10 hr ago +2
By design
2
iamBoda 9 hr ago +2
Reporter: *Didn't you bankrupt a C***** an 4 or 5 other compnies* Orange Führer: *Hold my beer*
2
mahleg4 8 hr ago +2
The title should be : "How our leaders fundamentally destroying worlds natural habitats and creating crisis after crisis"..
2
average-dad69 7 hr ago +1
The IEA has been predicting peak oil for decades. Their forecasts are rich with analysis and consistently wrong. I expect this to be the same.
1
storeshadow 7 hr ago +1
He is talking bs, there is no real interest in adopting new electric or solar tech, its all carbons, the lobby is too strong. The change only will happen when we start to tun out.
1
AncientLion 7 hr ago +1
Thank you America, this is on you.
1
Beautiful_Finger4566 6 hr ago +1
don't threaten me with a good time
1
rubberpp 6 hr ago +1
More reasons for clean energy f*** oil
1
← Back to Board