· 102 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Mar 22, 2026 at 4:49 PM

The End of the Free-Range, Device-Free ‘Stand By Me’ Childhood.

Posted by Stony_Shore


This is a great “art imitates life” movie, right? There’s lots of nostalgia in this film, and older folks remember well the world of this movie. Could such a movie be made today about early 21st century childhood? What would it be like? What would the personalities be? How about settings? Interactions, emotions, tropes?

🚩 Report this post

102 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
run-on_sentience Mar 22, 2026 +220
What my dad would tell me any time I left the house: "Be good. Or don't get caught."
220
ClarkTwain Mar 22, 2026 +106
My mom had a similar saying. “Be good, and if you can’t be good, be careful.”
106
Scowlface Mar 23, 2026 +22
My dad still tells me that and I’m 40.
22
Aggravating_Pea6419 Mar 23, 2026 +13
Lil’ Wayne told me: be good or be good at it.
13
Tacdeho Mar 23, 2026 +6
Mine told me I can do anything I want as long as she doesn’t get a call from the sheriff, the hospital or the morgue.
6
DrunksInSpace Mar 23, 2026 +2
I used to bartend and would tell all the 70+ regulars that: “be good, if you can’t be good be careful, and if you can’t be careful name them after me!”
2
designking4248 Mar 23, 2026 +21
“Dont add to or subtract from the human population”
21
MiniRipperton Mar 23, 2026 +6
My dad’s was, “don’t do anything I wouldn’t do”. Which pretty much meant we could do whatever we wanted.
6
ThatDiscoSongUHate Mar 23, 2026 +4
My grandfather always told me that too, haha Loved when I'd say "you too!"
4
vincentxanthony Mar 23, 2026 +3
I always use “be good or be good at it”. Whichever comes first
3
heyyouwtf Mar 23, 2026 +3
My mom always said "Don't come hone with a child."
3
run-on_sentience Mar 23, 2026 +1
She clearly doesn't want grandkids.
1
king_of_the_nothing Mar 22, 2026 +324
I blame the end of free range childhood on the 80’s “missing children” milk cartons. I just rewatched Flight of the Navigator and realized that the entire premise doesn’t work anymore.
324
farmer_yohei Mar 22, 2026 +55
I watched that movie 2 years ago, or whenever Disney Plus came about. Still holds up. I was so happy it did.
55
Hear7breaker Mar 22, 2026 +14
Compliance
14
king_of_the_nothing Mar 22, 2026 +11
Pee Wee was great
11
crookedframe13 Mar 22, 2026 +82
I think it's the 24/hrs news cycle and the sensationalism of news for profit. It's like why snark threads are so popular on reddit. Anger, fear, and hatefulness is the best seller there is. It then makes the world seem much more dangerous when it's really not.
82
Snoo93079 Mar 23, 2026 +33
Absolutely agree. Cable news plus internet means everyone is scared of everything all the time. As an elder millenial I definitely view the world in three time frames 1) pre/post social media 2) pre post 9/11 3) pre/post COVID
33
str8rippinfartz Mar 23, 2026 +16
Honestly it wasn't social media itself, it was the popularization of the smartphone The big difference with social media came when it was available 24/7 on mobile
16
angrath Mar 23, 2026 +6
Huh - that’s a great nuance that I hadn’t considered before - thanks for the great thought to start my week on!
6
Khiva Mar 23, 2026 +1
Smartphones were the delivery vectors for social media - it was the unholy union that marks 2015 as the rough start to the Disinformation Age.
1
angrath Mar 23, 2026 +1
Aaaand there we go - that was the dumb comment I needed to level off my day.
1
retief1 Mar 23, 2026 +6
Yup. The news basically cherry-picks the worst things that are happening in the country and then talks about them constantly. People then see the 24/7 parade of awfulness on the news and think that stuff is common, even when it is actually incredibly rare. Edit: say something happens to one person a day somewhere in the us, and it makes nationwide news every time. It would be in the news constantly, but if you live to be 100, the odds of that thing ever actually happening to you would be about 0.012%.
6
king_of_the_nothing Mar 23, 2026 +1
I remember when the FBI did a study on home invasions during the Obama era. They had to adopt a very wide definition of “home invasion”, because the classic view of armed men kicking in your door to rob you just doesn’t happen. The few case they found involved criminals robbing other criminals. But when I talk to people that want a gun for “home defense”, the idea of a home invasion always comes up.
1
ImpulsE69 Mar 22, 2026 +77
Sort of....but in reality we were still doing whatever we wanted from dawn to dusk well into the 90's. It was 'our' generation that suddenly was scared for their kids and wanted to be their friends. I was a 12(?) yr old paperboy when Johnny Gosh went missing...and it didn't stop anything. Still delivered papers by myself at 3AM.
77
cjorgensen Mar 22, 2026 +18
I found out about this on the front page of the newspaper that I was delivering at 3 AM.
18
Brendissimo Mar 23, 2026 +8
You had a very different 90s childhood than I did. I think it varies wildly based on region, size of the community you grow up in, local culture, and parents.
8
HerbsAndSpices11 Mar 22, 2026 +4
3AM is nuts! What time did your route have to finish by?
4
ImpulsE69 Mar 23, 2026 +8
I think it was 5 or 6AM. Sunday paper.
8
LeBronGOOD Mar 23, 2026 +2
That’s crazy lol, weren’t you tired as a kid?
2
Ok-Coconut-5965 Mar 23, 2026 +9
Not OP but was a kid with a 3am paper route. The answer is no. I was never tired. My mother will confirm.
9
Twodogsonecouch Mar 23, 2026 +3
No its not that was normal. I did it too at 14. Also spent my day in the woods and riding bikes and my nights playing video games at friends houses till late and walked/rode my bike home in the dark. The way the Stranger Things kids lived wasn’t a lie.
3
CaptainRhetorica Mar 23, 2026 +6
I recall that a shitty side effect of the Runaway Train music video, that played with the missing children milk carton idea, returned some abused kids to the abusive environment they had rightfully fled. It amazes me how many people, some of them in positions important to child welfare, completely d******* the existence of child abuse. So many laws and policies enable abusers and allow them to gatekeep their children's access to important services.
6
thicc-description Mar 23, 2026 +2
The beginning of that movie is so heartbreaking 😭
2
MayonaiseBuffet Mar 23, 2026 +2
I grew up in the 80s and 90s. We wandered the countryside (I was a farm kid) and cities (cousin lived there) with no care from our parents.  Now, I go for a walk around town and never even see kids in their yards, let alone wandering freely..
2
MayonaiseBuffet Mar 23, 2026 +1
No. It's devices and computers and TV as the reason to stay inside. 
1
king_of_the_nothing Mar 23, 2026 +2
All of the kids that stared at those milk cartons while eating their morning cereal are the parents that won’t let their kids walk to school now. I see a direct link. Remember, parents are in charge (or should be). If the parents wanted free range kids, they would make it happen. The kids opt for the easy route of TV and devices BECAUSE they can’t go anywhere until mom is ready to take them. They have adapted to the parenting style, not the other way around.
2
MayonaiseBuffet Mar 23, 2026 +1
Tons of kids walk to school, though. The thing is kids don't play outside. Not just that they don't wander their neighborhood, they don't even go in their yards. I live in a neighborhood full of kids and there are maybe 3 houses (mine included) where kids play outside. It's weird.  Parents give their kids devices and screens because it's easy. If your kids play with real things or God forbid they go outside, then it requires active parenting. 
1
longjumpingtote Mar 22, 2026 +168
This went for seeing movies as well. How were your parents going to know what movies you saw? They had to work. You had a bike. Movies galore. It wasn't possible for most people to be a helicopter parent in the 1970s, and into the 1980s. Not unless you'd literally lock your kid in the house (which wouldn't work anyway) or unless you had a stay-at-home parent who was with them all of the time. In the 1990s parents started coordinating with each other to get kids where they "needed" to be, 24/7. Everything structured. Eventually, technology allowed kids to be communicated with while they weren't at home. That's the biggest thing that some people miss: before pagers and cell phones were common, once a kid left home, as a parent you had to rely on your teaching and training of them to get them home. Their fear of punishment in some cases. You had to raise your kids to act smart (or fail to do that) because they needed to navigate the world on a day-by-day basis without you. We would have checklists. "Go to grandma's then X, then Y, then Z. If ABC, then LMNOP. The bus is 35¢ so here's a quarter and two nickels. If you miss the 30, the 31 is fine, it's just slower, either 30 or 31." It was good training for being independent because you were literally being trained on the right way to do thing, and the patterns would get reinforced over time. We were Leif Ericson. Kids that came after us, many times experienced the world inside of a car.
168
AtTheFirePit Mar 22, 2026 +36
The ticket seller wouldn’t let us in. Few if any kids were tall enough to attempt buying a ticket for an R rated movie. Few tried bc friends couldn’t join them. I imagine that was the case anywhere but a decent sized city. Same w “dirty magazines”. Had to raid parent stash, have a willing older sibling, tall friend who was willing to go into the store and buy it or, stumble upon forest p***. (Collections occasionally used to be buried in the woods for various reasons.).
36
Blue_Checkers Mar 22, 2026 +38
Lol we used to just buy tickets to whatever movie and then bounce to the theater playing Desperado or what have you.
38
ThatsWhatSheaSaid Mar 23, 2026 +7
I was gonna say lol, we just bought a ticket for whatever PG movie was playing at the same time and snuck into the R film. NGL I should not have watched Eyes Wide Shut at 14 lmao
7
DrunksInSpace Mar 23, 2026 +15
Biggest thing is safe streets and sidewalks. My kids have friends in our neighborhood but the roads between neighborhoods require a car. No way In letting them ride on a busy county road where cars fly and there’s new shattered accident evidence once a week. And so few public spaces. Now even the malls are dying. Gotta spend money just to be in public.
15
Tobar_the_Gypsy Mar 23, 2026 +6
I’m honestly much more scared of cars hitting my kids than some stranger abducting them. People freak out about speed cameras in a damn school zone. 
6
DrunksInSpace Mar 23, 2026 +2
1000% I consider myself pretty cautious. But I know I’m not as wary of cyclists and pedestrians in areas where I don’t often see them, compared to areas with sidewalks/bike lanes and foot traffic. Which doubles the danger because where there are no sidewalks/bike lanes, cyclists and pedestrians are forced onto the narrow curb, closer to a road full of drivers who aren’t expecting them.
2
estate_agent Mar 23, 2026 +16
My younger cousin, who is 18 years old, once ended up on the other side of town on his way to meet me because in his words “the bus didn’t show at the stop you told me to wait from, so I crossed the road and got on the first bus that showed up there instead”. I thought maybe he was a special case of ditsy but a few weeks later his friends made the same mistake trying to get home using the train. They got on a train that was going the completely opposite way. Apparently this was not the first time they made that mistake. The mind boggles. All of this despite having devices in their hands that tell them exactly where to go.
16
ghoti99 Mar 22, 2026 +120
“It’s 9pm do you know where your children are?” Nostalgia for the generation that had to be reminded by the TV that they had kids completely negates any concern for smart phones.
120
ElongatedAustralian Mar 22, 2026 +70
“I told you last time, no!”
70
USAesNumeroUno Mar 22, 2026 +23
“His food is getting all cold, and eaten”
23
Ok-Coconut-5965 Mar 23, 2026 +7
Stupid TV, be more funny!
7
B-tchEatingCrackers Mar 23, 2026 +3
It was 10pm
3
whitepangolin Mar 22, 2026 +205
Man, I miss the good old days of discovering a corpse and getting a knife pulled on you by a gang versus playing Roblox with my friends
205
palebluedot24 Mar 22, 2026 +49
They had a handgun to protect themselves!
49
Ucw2thebone Mar 22, 2026 +31
And a comb for when they were going to be on the news!
31
Rayeon-XXX Mar 22, 2026 +9
Whaddya need a comb for you don't even have any hair!!
9
Vintage_Milk Mar 22, 2026 +2
Well if we're gonna be on TV you wanna look good, right?
2
palebluedot24 Mar 22, 2026 +1
But then lost it
1
stormdraggy Mar 22, 2026 +16
Don't forget about dodging trains. And leeches in...places...
16
king_of_the_nothing Mar 22, 2026 +35
Funny. I grew up in the 60’s and 70’s in So Cal. I went everywhere on my bike. By the time I got my license I had been from Mexico to Oceanside and from PB to Julian. I never saw a corpse or had a gun pulled on me. And even without those things, it was still WAY more exciting than Roblox. I still tell the story of the hawk that flew 3 feet over my head with a rattlesnake squirming in its talons. What session of Roblox will you remember 40 years from now?
35
Milesware Mar 23, 2026 +1
>What session of Roblox will you remember 40 years from now you'd be surprised
1
king_of_the_nothing Mar 23, 2026 +7
That’s fair. I would be surprised.
7
Khiva Mar 23, 2026 +1
Late, but f****** killer response. I'm stealing this.
1
NepheliLouxWarrior Mar 22, 2026 -11
\>And even without those things, it was still WAY more exciting than Roblox. How much Roblox have you played to quantify this opinion? Since if you grew up in the 60s/70s then you are pushing if not older than 70.
-11
king_of_the_nothing Mar 22, 2026 +12
True. I play Roblox with my grand kids and I find it rather dull. So do the kids, they would rather play GTA or Fortnight… even Minecraft. Roblox is good if you have to kill a little time.
12
carlos_the_dwarf_ Mar 22, 2026 +7
Who gives a shit, honestly? Is any cool Roblox session more memorable than cool real-life shit?
7
southpaw85 Mar 22, 2026 -1
Sounds like you weren’t doing anything fun if nobody ever shot at you./s
-1
king_of_the_nothing Mar 23, 2026 +1
That all came later. I was working retail in a bad part of San Diego, the week I quit 5 people were shot within a block of the store. One was shot by the police, so maybe that doesn’t count?
1
tanstaafl90 Mar 23, 2026 -2
The comment is plot points of the movie. An attempt to be clever.
-2
SsooooOriginal Mar 22, 2026 -27
Cool, what have you done since then to keep or make anything better than Roblox?
-27
putsch80 Mar 22, 2026 +14
What the hell does this even mean? It’s no one’s job to “make” anything for you. The ability to entertain oneself is part of the general functionality of being a human being. This was why the “free range” childhood led to adventures: because kids would think up ways to entertain themselves and would broaden themselves, their knowledge and their personalities in the process. Your inability to do that is more a function of you being unimaginative and likely quite dull, rather than a function of the fact that somebody hasn’t built you a better toy to keep you happy.
14
wabawanga Mar 22, 2026 +1
And crossing a trestle bridge of an active rail line
1
Blagnet Mar 23, 2026 +4
It's a little rough to see an article like this, when Stephen King's horror writer origin story was witnessing his friend get hit by a train as a boy... Like, childhood has changed a lot, but do we really want to get nostalgic about the childhood of Stephen King? 
4
audioragegarden Mar 23, 2026 +1
Not gonna lie, I found his poison ivy story far more disturbing.
1
thefruitsofzellman Mar 22, 2026 +35
I guarantee you that old fogies in 1959 were saying that these young whippersnappers are watching too much tv and disconnected from reality.
35
Heimatlos-Malot Mar 22, 2026 +15
My parents report that you are correct! And then they worried that we spent too much time on the NES. YEAH WHEN IT'S 115 DEGREES OUTSIDE ITS NICE TO HAVE THAT OPTION
15
portagenaybur Mar 23, 2026 +2
Yah because they were able to play and have adventures instead of working the mines and textile factories like the previous generation
2
thefruitsofzellman Mar 23, 2026 +1
No way that thief and two feebs get hired at the Triangle Shirtwaist factory.
1
MayonaiseBuffet Mar 23, 2026 +2
They weren't wrong. 
2
Dear_Vanilla_370 Mar 23, 2026 +6
Classic NYT “20 years too late” commentary headline
6
NepheliLouxWarrior Mar 22, 2026 +56
\>Could such a movie be made today about early 21st century childhood? Yes. \>What would it be like? Kids on some other kind of adventure, just with smart phones. \>What would the personalities be? Probably not much different from the personalities of the kids in Stand by Be. \>How about settings? Interactions, emotions, tropes? Could be anything from kids on a camping trip in the woods, to running around in a city, pretty much anything you can imagine. As always with this weird ass generational relativity "le KIDS these days amirite" concepts, things haven't changed nearly as much as we think they have, and no generation is special. There are still kids that live in rural shitholes and hang out in the woods and smoke ciagrettes and get into trouble. There are still kids that don't come home until 9pm and their parents don't know where they are. These kinds of posts imply that 90% of children live in Suburbia and if they're not at school then they're just at home playing video games and shitposting on Reddit. That's not true, though. What people don't understand is that it is not your circumstances that created that childlike feeling of wonder and adventure. It's *being a child* that creates that feeling of wonder and adventure.
56
ElSquibbonator Mar 23, 2026 +10
Up until a couple years ago I lived at my parents' house in the suburbs (I live in an apartment now), and in the summer there were still kids running around in their yards doing whatever it is they do. There were always kids riding by on bikes and scooters. The girls two doors down from my parents' house made a lemonade stand every summer, and I think they still do it. Even today, I live just down the street from the park, and there's rarely a day when it's not full of kids. I think the reason why we get this attitude is because the majority of people writing these opinion pieces are younger Millennials and Gen Z, and they increasingly live in cities instead of suburbs. And in cities, you just don't see as many kids playing outside, for obvious reasons.
10
basealloyofhypocrisy Mar 23, 2026 -4
i live in a city, right near a park - my kids are always there until it gets dark or a little after - laughing, running, riding bikes and scooters - there are even lemonade stands in the summer! - curious what your “obvious reasons” are captain suburbs
-4
HankSteakfist Mar 22, 2026 +3
'Boyhood' captures that era well. Because it was actually filmed during that era.
3
Stony_Shore Mar 22, 2026 +5
Thanks. It was fun to read this and think about it.
5
MayonaiseBuffet Mar 23, 2026 +2
Kids don't go on adventures, though. 
2
nytopinion Mar 22, 2026 +8
Thank you for sharing. Read the full article [for free here](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/22/opinion/stand-by-me-stephen-king-rob-reiner-screen-time.html?unlocked_article_code=1.VFA.iqzx.ZtZ4DAiniBhX&smid=re-nytopinion), even without a Times subscription.
8
FreeRange0929 Mar 23, 2026 +7
I work in cell phone sales, it’s not glamorous, I don’t like it, but I see some terrifying shit. Preschool aged children with their own phone lines, pretty much every young child with a tablet. They can’t function without a screen. My son, I try to be conscious on it. He likes to use my camera, and I will very rarely play a YouTube song (he has 1 Danny Go and a couple Monster Truck videos he likes, and even that gives me pause sometimes with how he behaves afterwards), and we will video all his grandparents every couple nights. Beyond that, tv time is supposedly less harmful than small screen, so he can earn 15 minute increments of Paw Patrol/Elmo/Thomas or we’ll have the odd family movie night by making his bed or behaving (up to 90 minutes in a day) I don’t say that to toot my own horn, but to point out how terrifying it is that this seemingly isn’t the norm. Kids don’t get out and play because they’re sedated by screens. Schools presume that they need to be on tablets to “learn” them…when the point of tablets is they’re idiot proof. It is VERY tempting to let the screen babysit, and that only becomes more true when you can hand a device to the child instead of it being on the family tv. That’s how you create addiction, exposure to p********** and violence, and just generally exposure to inappropriate content. I don’t know that the world today is set up for the (excuse the username, it’s an unrelated joke) free range society of the 80’s. That died with stranger danger. It’s all but illegal at this point to have children roaming unsupervised (not that I agree with that, but neighborhood snoops would call the police on an unaccompanied group of children on the train tracks nowadays) But…play with your kids. Take them to the park. Do whatever you can to keep them off the small screens, those things are poison, especially for small minds.
7
exonwarrior Mar 23, 2026 +3
> That’s how you create addiction, exposure to p********** and violence, and just generally exposure to inappropriate content. My son is only 3 months old so these topics are still a ways away. However I have friends and family members with older kids, and it's ridiculous how few parents know or care about setting up content filters etc., or even just not giving their small children smartphones! My friend was recently lamenting that he goes to the trouble of setting up all of these different filters on the family's devices, but so what if most of the kids in his (9yo) son's class have unfiltered access and can just show him inappropriate stuff?
3
josheklow Mar 23, 2026 +3
Weren’t the kids in Stand By Me going to look at the dead body of a missing kid? Doesn’t see like device free childhood worked out for that kid.
3
GlamMetalLion Mar 22, 2026 +6
It's funny, when I was growing up in the mid 2000s there were definitely some parents who leaned towards one or the other here in Puerto Rico. Pure latch key kids vs kids with stay at home moms.
6
Milesware Mar 23, 2026 +5
I think the nature of Nostalgia has always been "my thing is better than your thing" which is always followed by opinions such as "tv is bad", "rock and roll is not music", "iPad is bad", EDM is not music", "video games are bad", "Kpop is not music". In reality the generation who grew up with the star wars prequels adore them because they grew up with them, not because it's better or worse.
5
Tylenoel Mar 23, 2026 +1
Am part of the generation that grew up with the prequels, can’t say we adored them. I feel like the general consensus was the first one was fun. The second one was trash. The third one was fine.
1
[deleted] Mar 22, 2026 +1
[deleted]
1
theocracy123 Mar 22, 2026 +16
That last one seems kind of on you...
16
PrinceNelson Mar 22, 2026 +4
Sheesh that last point was much worse than the previous two and also completely avoidable.
4
foghillgal Mar 22, 2026 +7
Yeah last one is terrible buddy .  
7
CormoranNeoTropical Mar 23, 2026 +2
Why?
2
UslyfoxU Mar 23, 2026 +1
So I'm assuming that I'm the only person that saw the great flick Riddle of Fire?
1
EctoBlaster1985 Mar 22, 2026 +2
Can’t read it, have to sign up to a newsletter in order to read.
2
Stony_Shore Mar 22, 2026 +6
Sorry about that. It wasn’t paywalled when I posted. See below: The New York Times has given us free access without an account. Hope you can read it…
6
EctoBlaster1985 Mar 22, 2026 +1
Yeah, I managed. After reading it, boy, change happened these last few decades.
1
pheechad Mar 23, 2026 +1
Use Archive (dot) ph
1
← Back to Board