“the default in American culture today is to put the desires of adults over the needs of children”
Absolutely true. That’s why we don’t have, among other things, mandatory paid parental leave or paid sick leave, adequately funded public schools, free meals for kids at school, or politicians that care about reducing gun related deaths of children. Nope, the default is to meet the desires of adults in the oligarch class and funnel money up to them at all costs.
1242
PennysWorthOfTeaMar 23, 2026
+368
The irony in them making such claims while simultaneously treating children as property who exist to be indoctrinated
368
echoshatterMar 23, 2026
+41
Don't forget - AI is going to replace almost everyone, but we need the birth rate to be high....
There are so, so many contradictions going on here.
41
PennysWorthOfTeaMar 23, 2026
+20
They need a pool of ~~desperate~~ *eager* ~~slave laborers~~ *patriots* to proof read & correct all of that AI slop
20
HaterMDMar 23, 2026
+48
I mean, I’d believe they cared about children if the wealthy elites didn’t r*** and kill them for sport.
48
james_the_wandererMar 23, 2026
+89
As a childless gay singleton, it still blows. Late stage capitalism sucks for everyone but the biz owners.
89
MyRedditUsername224Mar 23, 2026
+3003
From the piece:
*The Heritage Foundation’s latest document,* [*“Saving America by Saving the Family: A Foundation for the Next 250 Years,”*](https://www.heritage.org/marriage-and-family/report/saving-america-saving-the-family-foundation-the-next-250-years) *was published in January, and its purported goal is to reverse the country’s declining birthrate.*
*See, if you can’t physically force women to have more babies, which is what* [*abortion restrictions*](https://www.ms.now/news/hawley-abortion-pill-ban-republican-response-trump) *aim to do, you design government policies that pressure women into having more babies.*
*You cut off opportunities outside the home, you make the public sphere hostile to women’s independence and you create a system where the only viable path left for a woman is dependence on a man for survival. In other words, you drag the country back to a time when women had fewer choices.*
3003
danappropriateMar 23, 2026
+2393
All this will do is sow distrust among the sexes, force women to band into groups to survive, and further lower the birthrate.
You want more babies? Stop putting up economic and social barriers to starting a family. Stop f****** with education. Provide affordable access to healthcare and childcare. Tone down the machismo and knock it off with the insane levels of misogyny. Stop trying to pummel people with your particular brand of sky daddy mythos who want nothing to do with it. Tah-dah!
2393
Chill_PandaMar 23, 2026
+407
Governments will literally take away rights to try and get you to have babies before they provide the right economy where people want to have babies
407
CelloerMar 23, 2026
+89
And then the government still ends up with "surplus males" with no access to acquire education, employment, or a mate, so the government has to get them killed off by disease, localized violence, or foreign wars.
89
FolkMetalWarriorMar 23, 2026
+39
Femi-infanticide is much higher in countries that are so strongly patriarchal, which to you point, leads to surplus males who are unable to find work or partners. It's terrible for any country.
39
XiuCyxMar 23, 2026
+20
In 2003 economists suggested we needed to increase immigration to supplement declining birth rates but the racists don’t like that.
20
pixi88Mar 23, 2026
+457
I feel, as a woman, we've already started.
457
Old_CryptidMar 23, 2026
+111
They have. The Heritage Foundation has had this as an explicit goal since Reagan. They've taken small steps until now to pave the way for this.
People forget it was as recently as the late 70s that women still needed their husband's permission for their own financial decisions. Marital r*** wasn't possible and couldn't be legally challenged.
The Heritage Foundation and the GOP need to be removed. Vote out the GOP and kick every person affiliated with the Heritage Foundation out and bar them from serving in any public office or government position.
111
probably_a_deerMar 23, 2026
+42
Heritage is evil. They're literally the cause of more death and destruction on this planet than any other American think tank. The decisions they've helped push have done everything from enable African countries to pass harsh penalties for being gay, to causing the trans moral panic to manifest worldwide, to destroying family planning across South and Central America. They do this by giving policy direction and legal assistance to allied authoritarians and religious extremists, while offering connections to dark money to achieve those goals. Denying AIDS medication, The Mexico City policy that also bans family planning, the destruction of USAID, the resulting famines...all Heritage, at the core.
They're grotesque and due to the fact that they've enabled Trump/Vance/Hegseth, they've literally brought the world to the brink of nuclear war.
No matter how much you think Heritage is bad, they're even worse than that.
42
Kaa_The_SnakeMar 23, 2026
+12
How do we dismantle them? I don’t think they’ll care about more protests.
12
Old_CryptidMar 23, 2026
+16
Massive legislative and political reform. I don't think any organization, or the public, has the will to do it. Yet.
The Heritage Foundation, Federalist Society, and Citizens United are three things that need to be disbanded (repealed with Citizens United) and anybody affilated with either organization barred from public office.
Those aren't the only ones but those are the big three at the front. There are dozens, if not hundreds of other "Conservative" Christian groups carrying water for these folk.
16
Euphoric_Invite3873Mar 23, 2026
+127
Golden Girls.... here we come.
127
fabric_fanaticMar 23, 2026
+39
Me and my friends already have a plan for this.
39
FunkyHedonistMar 23, 2026
+297
100% agree. They want to Handmaids Tale, but instead they are going to get an explosion of lesbian communes, who swear off marriage and kids forever. Its like when they banned abortion, the amount of women and men who sterilized themselves after the ban went through the roof.
297
NanDemoNeeMar 23, 2026
+83
I don't think that's gonna happen. There are plenty of conservative women that are helping the GOP do this. There will always be women who will not fight for their own self interests. Like Erika Kirk.
83
FunkyHedonistMar 23, 2026
+119
Those women won't be invited to the lesbian communes. Which is a shame because thats where the best parties will be. But seriously, you don't need all the women to participate in order for the fertility rate to get nuked. If a majority of women completely drop out of the "marriage and kids" game, its over for the national fertility rate and the economy. (I don't mean to say that like its a bad thing. I'm a childfree, anti-natalist)
119
disorderincosmosMar 23, 2026
+6
Yup that's me. I got those egg noodles out asap after Dobbs.
6
Tight_ManMar 23, 2026
+52
Yeah this is like the fastest way to get my husband a vasectomy. We wanted three kids so that kind of sucks I guess.
52
MissLogiosMar 23, 2026
+34
Yeah, I saw the writing on the wall after Roe got overturned. Just ran instantly to the nearest Gyno who would sterilize me and got my tubes removed. And I was 23 at the time.
For anyone interested in the same, check out r/childfree's list of doctors who will be happy to do the procedure regardless of age!
34
PM_ME_SOME_ANY_THINGMar 23, 2026
+686
You could just pay everyone enough to be able to afford children… but nooo
686
the_nobodysMar 23, 2026
+419
That's because the having more children isn't the ends, its a means. The ends is a reversion to an older social structure where women are property of husbands.
419
goodtimejonnieMar 23, 2026
+226
This ☝️ if they actually just wanted more babies, they’d raise the minimum wage. Another Reddit thread i saw earlier today had 2 charts, one showing the sharp rise in age of parents having their first child after 1971 and another showing the stagnation of wages also in 1971 while productivity continued to skyrocket. People aren’t waiting to become parents cuz they dont want kids, theyre waiting because they can’t afford them until much later in life
226
vandreulvMar 23, 2026
+42
> if they actually just wanted more babies,
They don't.
All of it is a false pretense for dominionism.
42
insanitazerMar 23, 2026
+25
Also, if a family of, say, 6 people depends on a single income, they'd be desperate enough to take any job for next to nothing. States like Iowa have already passed laws permitting 14 year olds to work on assembly lines.
People forget that it was because of those *terrible* progressives that we have the 8 hour workday, free weekends, and - outside the US :p - free healthcare. It's not like conservative capitalists looked at 6 year olds working their asses off in the mines and took pity on them - they actively opposed and resisted ending child labor. Never forget that.
25
RaesongMar 23, 2026
+16
These guys really do want to make America the new Rome in all the worst ways.
16
AdmiralCrackbarMar 23, 2026
+158
I mean this is it. This is the reason people have less children. It's not because they don't want them, it's not because they want to spend more time partying and living care free. It's because people can't even afford a house with two incomes, let alone start a family.
If I have kids then either my wife or I have to give up our job to stay home and look after the child, and if we do that then we can't afford both the mortgage on our house and the loan for the car, and if we can't afford the car then we can't travel in to the city for work from the town where we relocated, and if we hadn't relocated we couldn't have afforded a decent house with enough living space for two adults and a child.
And we live in what is supposed to be an affordable city in a country that isn't currently run by a wannabe fascist dictator. Neither of us has a terrible job, we both earn what is supposed to be a livable wage. I honestly don't know how families do it.
158
steelhipsMar 23, 2026
+118
Having kids is a crapshoot. Now imagine having a child with chronic illness and/or disability in the US healthcare "system".
118
VeeDubBugMar 23, 2026
+20
Friends are in this position. Their trick was they didn't get married so she's a single mother and gets medical benefits that way.
I don't disagree with them "abusing" the system, because otherwise they wouldn't be able to afford treatment for their kid with CF. We're a fucked up little society.
20
RhysatiMar 23, 2026
+6
They aren't abusing anything. Getting married is not a requirement and never has been. They are sacrificing the benefits of marriage like joint income taxes, lower rates on various insurances, etc in favor of other benefits they would lose to gain those.
6
SeveralPhysics9362Mar 23, 2026
+19
These people don’t want to enact good policies to raise how many children people have. They are religious nutcases. They want to go back in time to where minorities and women “knew their place”.
19
PoniesRBitchinMar 23, 2026
+51
It's because this is actually about punishing women, but they can't just admit they want all females to be sex slaves because that wouldn't fly even in conservative spaces, so they have to pretend they're just so concerned about The Children. That always gets morons on board with bad ideas!
51
NanDemoNeeMar 23, 2026
+8
I think we're a couple of weeks before they admit that. They're already admitting they want to make the US a theocracy.
8
The_bruce42Mar 23, 2026
+476
They must have watched A Handmaid's tale and thought it looked like the ideal world
476
slingshot91Mar 23, 2026
+296
They have no real ideas. This is how every tech CEO is also operating these days. No original ideas. Just copying the dystopian horrors depicted on screen/page.
296
Fubai97bMar 23, 2026
+96
Just once I'd like them to copy something from a feel good solarpunk book instead of the Throngulator from the sci-fi classic "For the Love of God, Never Make a Throngulator"
96
the_nobodysMar 23, 2026
+32
Understand, I would use the Throngulator from a desire to do good...
32
Bodkin-Van-HornMar 23, 2026
+21
In place of a Dark Lord, you would have a Tech Bro! All will glaze me and despair!
21
moneyh8r_twoMar 23, 2026
+8
It is a gift!
8
Thor_2099Mar 23, 2026
+12
Or just f****** Star Trek.
12
steelhipsMar 23, 2026
+27
They are bankrolling this BS but have a drawer full of alternative citizenship/passports when it all goes wrong.
27
wankthiswayMar 23, 2026
+20
Honestly their ideas are horrific, nefarious, and sound really clever villain-y, but they really are just parroting what they've seen in "nerd culture" - aka all the bad shit that the culture satirizes or says "hey we shouldn't do these terrible things I imagined in my head. Humans aren't evil enough to do these things right?" It's kinda pathetic.
20
flip314Mar 23, 2026
+9
New ideas are anathema to conservatism. Its premise is that all the good ideas are old ones.
9
jibberwockieMar 23, 2026
+46
But they are offering choices to women. You could be a breeder, or a Martha. See, lots of choices!
46
TrailerTrashQueenMar 23, 2026
+23
remind me, which one is Martha? the older lady who disciplines the young girls/breeders? i stopped watching when Roe v. Wade was overturned. became too 'art imitating life' & 'life imitating art'.
23
Silver_EntertainmentMar 23, 2026
+33
Martha isn't a name. Rather, it's a title for the servants responsible for the cooking, cleaning, and babysitting of the Commanders' families.
33
BimblelinaMar 23, 2026
+8
Infertile but able to run a household, cooking and cleaning.
8
OnCallPartisanMar 23, 2026
+19
No, they’re the original inspiration. Literally.
19
wheelsonthebusgo1Mar 23, 2026
+11
Power hungry weak minded males, who need someone or something to feel powerful over.
11
Revolutionary-Yak-47Mar 23, 2026
+94
This simply wont work in our economy. Our whole system depends on two income households buying stuff. If women cant work, who's buying a second car, bigger house and all the *stuff* sold to Americans as necessary? They can fantasize all they want but the American economy cant operate this way anymore.
94
ABK2445Mar 23, 2026
+48
It will create a wider wealth gap, which I believe is another goal
48
ConstantStatisticianMar 23, 2026
+18
A single earner can't easily provide for a family anymore.
18
LetstalkreaperMar 23, 2026
+8
They’ve come to the conclusion they don’t really need poor people buying things. ~50% of consumer spending in the US is done by the top 10% of the population. So as long as you insulated say the top 20% from any of the huge negative impacts you’ll only have a 20-30% contraction in how much money they make. Which is still an obscene amount of money.
This is also why they’re not as worried as the rest of us about AI killing all the “poor people” jobs and tanking the economy. They recognize that the benefits to them outweigh the negative impacts so long as they can keep 70-80% of the consumer spending flowing.
8
Whoooosh_1492Mar 23, 2026
+6
What economy? IQ47 is running up the national debt, deporting half the labor pool, imposing tariffs willy-nilly, and who knows what stuff behind our backs. If the economy survives this, if the country survives this, well...
6
MasterofPandas1Mar 23, 2026
+45
So how about instead of all that bullshit you work on making it more affordable for people to have kids by raising wages and trying to lower inflation. And maybe some policies that work towards slowing climate change so that kids born today won’t be in their prime adult years when it’s really going to hit. Oh, this one is really important. Maybe don’t work towards being a fascist nation where everyone is miserable? Just a few f****** suggestions.
45
steelhipsMar 23, 2026
+40
They blame women for many societal ills. This way they get what they want AND punish women at the same time.
If they really cared about reducing abortion, they would be advocating for vasectomies after putting a sample contingency on ice. It's about power not ideology.
40
BerryLankyMar 23, 2026
+28
Wait until they read about slavery. ‘Why didn’t we think of that?’
28
spacegiantsrockMar 23, 2026
+13
We have all these people in concentration camps and we'll need to keep them busy.
13
12PoundCanklesMar 23, 2026
+26
Has anyone ever asked themselves why they would want women to have more babies when there are no jobs available for the people that exist and they simultaneously keep talking about how AI is going make those who have jobs unemployed?
Are they planning on eating them? What is the actual point?
26
HomerJSimpson3Mar 23, 2026
+21
They want women to be homemakers again. That would remove half the workforce. It still doesn’t make any sense since so many people rely on 2+ incomes to make ends meet.
21
Pinklady777Mar 23, 2026
+24
Most people want to have children. It's just not practical/affordable. They could literally just provide things like paid maternity leave and affordable healthcare, childcare, food and housing and people would have more babies.
24
JinimyCriticMar 23, 2026
+50
Ugh. Disgusting. I really fear where society seems to be moving.
(I first read *A Handmaid's Tale* 2 decades ago, and dismissed it as unrealistic.
I reread it 2 years ago, and the fact that it terrified me is not a sign of societal progression.)
(For what it's worth, I'm a white male. I originally dismissed the story as science fiction, but it's terribly prescient.)
To any women reading this - Holy F***! Stay safe!
(And to anyone thinking this is an over-reaction, I refer you to ... all of history. Subjugation of vulnerable populations is terribly frequent.)
50
DeardogMar 23, 2026
+45
Let's be very clear. They are concerned about increasing the birth rate for WHITE women.
45
TheMoinesMar 23, 2026
+15
Why not just do like Sweden and manage a year of paid maternity leave?
15
Thor_2099Mar 23, 2026
+11
Joke is on them because their environmental policies are going to f*** the earth well before then.
11
B-Z_B-SMar 23, 2026
+3519
Basically, their plan is The Handmaid's Tale. The GOP is fundamentally very ideologically similar to the regime in Iran that they pretend to hate so much.
3519
shralpy39Mar 23, 2026
+1395
Yeah it was wild having DT talk about how horrible Iran is for shooting protestors while SIMULTANEOUSLY having his federal thugs shoot American citizens in Minnesota. Pot calling the kettle black.
1395
darksunshamanMar 23, 2026
+515
Or when Kegsbreath was going on about how it was terrible that the Iranian government spent so much on weapons and the military, instead of social programs.
Like, wtf?
515
BiggandwedgeMar 23, 2026
+204
Every accusation is projection.
204
Ceorl_LoungeMar 23, 2026
+81
Even the really weird ones about pizza and pedos that seemed random at first.
81
didureaditv2Mar 23, 2026
+20
Even the ones that contradict the other ones.
20
PastelBrat13Mar 23, 2026
+73
No, no, no Trump is actually doing this to protect gay rights or at least that's what he told the brilliant scholar Jake Paul.
73
breezy013276sMar 23, 2026
+23
Last term didn’t he ask somebody to shoot the protesters in dc between him and photo op?
23
BurdiacMar 23, 2026
+144
Back in the day there used to be a quiz on quotes and you had to guess between “Sharia law or fundamentalist Christian”
144
pile_of_fishMar 23, 2026
+167
I am so bitter about ending up in this specific dystopia. I was ready for brave new world, damn it!
167
EaglesunMar 23, 2026
+90
if it makes you feel any better, I've seen some predictions of mass starvation world wide as a result of climate change within the next ten years.
90
Basic_Improvement135Mar 23, 2026
+27
Don't worry. USAID provides for people worldwide!
27
TrailerTrashQueenMar 23, 2026
+11
hey! it's your cake day. guess you can snack on that?
11
pile_of_fishMar 23, 2026
+34
Not all that much better, honestly...
34
He2oinMegazordMar 23, 2026
+11
At least you got all those fish?
11
steelhipsMar 23, 2026
+8
Soylent Green is people!
8
__O_o_______Mar 23, 2026
+13
I’d settle for idiocracy. Sure they were idiots but most of them were at least well meaning.
13
pile_of_fishMar 23, 2026
+15
Im not even sure id count idiocracy as a dystopia at this point... and im not sure we are smarter than they are...
15
TrailerTrashQueenMar 23, 2026
+8
President Camacho is way smarter than Dear Leader.
8
TheSaltyAstronautMar 23, 2026
+6
I was told there would be soma!
6
sentripetalMar 23, 2026
+37
They hate them simply because they're a rival gang, not because they're fundamentally different.
37
ProudMtnsMar 23, 2026
+97
They're one main character away from being the exact same.
97
SinisterCroissantMar 23, 2026
+40
They hate us cause they aint us. Uno Reverse.
40
SuperstitiousPigeon5Mar 23, 2026
+18
They hate us cause they a***?
18
Basic_Improvement135Mar 23, 2026
+9
Oh they a*** hard
9
SinisterCroissantMar 23, 2026
+7
That would explain the Grindr outages during their conventions....
7
Own-Librarian-9699Mar 23, 2026
+134
Yes, it's infinitely baffling to me that Iran accomplished the rigid theocracy that maga craves, yet this war is allegedly about freedom for Iranians while Texas, Kansas, Idaho and Florida have fully embraced a theocracy no different than Iran.
Iran is actually a template for maga. Iran is their ultimate aspiration.
Which is why the war is purely about smoke and mirrors to distract and vitalize hate.
Their open goal is the full subjugation of women and the absolute extermination of all secularists.
134
pietroetinMar 23, 2026
+11
Yea, my conservative relative said we could learn a lot from the islam fundamentalists. If not for their religion and skin color, he would actually respect them.
11
cdubbs1Mar 23, 2026
+21
When I read "fanatical religious zealots" in an article about the Iran war it's never immediately clear to me who they're referring to.
21
Ok_Key_4731Mar 23, 2026
+48
Project 2025 used Handmaids Tale as an instruction manual.
48
Dr-Mumm-RahMar 23, 2026
+8
Sounds like jealousy that they implemented their religious agenda/law long before the GOP could.
8
Actual__WizardMar 23, 2026
+1028
You know what helps the birth rate in virtually all populations of animals?
Assuring their stress levels are low.
Their policies will absolutely do the polar opposite of what they think.
Stepping all over women is not going to bring the birth rate up, it will cause it to decline further.
They're stressing people out and that's why the birth rate is going down.
Stress causes plants to change their reproduction strategy as well.
So, these people are causing the problem that they say they are trying to solve.
1028
Pittman247Mar 23, 2026
+248
Friend, don’t let things like science get in the way. /s
248
underscore23Mar 23, 2026
+33
I’ve seen your point made a few times and it’s so true. It takes a lot to stress a mammal to not reproduce. If they want our birth rates to improve, reduce the stress of having kids.
So many of us are living by the skin of our teeth. One missed paycheck is hard; multiple missed paychecks is devastating. When life in general is so stressful and taxing is no surprise people are opting out to not have kids.
33
Stunning_Process7388Mar 23, 2026
+101
Not to mention what they're doing to the environment will have repercussions on reproduction as well! We're throwing a match into an oil barrel God help us
101
__O_o_______Mar 23, 2026
+30
I’ve been saying this for a lot of different things.
People were going to have less children when everything is unstable and stressful. That’s what the GOP do.
“Black people are naturally more violent and that’s why they commit more crimes!” while they’ve spent the entire history of America disadvantaging POC, and again, a safe animal, and that includes the human animal, if it’s basic needs are met without stress will be chill. Like, your dog would do anything for you but if you die and it needs to eat, bye bye face. Or predator and prey getting along because there’s no basic needs stress
Sometimes it’s hard to tell what’s on purpose and what is just incompetence/stupidity/ignorance.
Like, this war they’ve started is almost certainly creating new terrorists with a newly avowed hatred for America. They’re not destroying terror, they are causing it abroad and creating it abroad.
There are many examples of this.
If a core way you operate, as most conservative/right seem to, is based entirely on in-group vs out-group (some have to be in and some have to be out) and social hierarchy (some have to be at the top and some have to be at the bottom), you’re going to create a system that by default has people that are going to pinched into our groups or lower on the hierarchy, and that’s never going to be good for making sure everybody has their basic needs met.
But I digress….
30
IRideMoreThanYouMar 23, 2026
+760
> “Today’s adults may favor autonomy and personal development over raising children more than earlier generations did. Thus, greater opportunity cost rather than greater actual cost may be a better explanation.”
> Translation: Women today have opportunities their grandmothers could only dream of. They can pursue education, careers, independence — lives that extend beyond marriage and motherhood.
And this is playing into the unjustified anger of younger men that pretend society is preventing them from getting laid.
I hate these fucks.
760
weaponjaerevengeMar 23, 2026
+221
We can also choose to have families, whereas those in the past could not. These people don't want us to have children, they want slaves.
221
tired-of-the-shitMar 23, 2026
+57
We also have the ability to prevent conception which is way they hate birth control
57
KarysOvieMar 23, 2026
+64
Exactly. It’s basically a manifesto for forced trad-wifery. They’re terrified of a world where woman don’t have to rely on them, so they’re trying to legislate that independence out of existence. It’s as transparent as it is dangerous.
64
IRideMoreThanYouMar 23, 2026
+40
Forcing single income, large families, with massively unaffordable housing and removal of social programs.
That should play out amazingly well…
40
ValenShadowPawMar 23, 2026
+25
Considering that they want 1950s style social systems while having Gilded Age style economic systems, it'll be a total shitshow. I mean they want people who's finances would call for multiple extended families, with every single member of each of them working full time, and for everyone to live in single income households consisting of a single married couple and their kids.
25
NiznackMar 23, 2026
+15
And they will blame minorities all the way to the abyss.
15
Sad_Pangolin7379Mar 23, 2026
+6
Seriously
The math doesn't work out at all.
6
LadyPoMar 23, 2026
+27
They want half the population to be treated as men's cattle. They want to enslave us.
It's that serious, this is no exaggeration.
27
lactose_cowMar 23, 2026
+34
and those angry young incels end up being far right.
its all according to their plan
34
dietcokeeeeMar 23, 2026
+13
They also have been making red pill propaganda media to create these angry young incels.
13
J_SideMar 23, 2026
+32
Even women who are the opposite of this (prefer raising children over autonomy and development) are put off having children for other reasons, how are they going to fix those other factors?
I'm talking about absentee fathers who won't pay child support, and the current economic crisis making it difficult to afford a kid. In your country, if the father bails and the mother has no job, how does the family get health insurance.
Women didn't stop having kids for one reason. There are multiple factors in play that the Project just ignores on purpose
32
im_not_the_guy_37Mar 23, 2026
+27
I truly would love to have more children. But my husband and I don’t see a way to do it that doesn’t make the whole family struggle more. Everything is expensive and nothing is being done about the cost of childcare, food, health insurance, etc. They rage against women who want to be child free but don’t seem to notice that there is a large population of us who would love to have more if it wasn’t so damn difficult to survive with more mouths to feed
27
cinemachickMar 23, 2026
+89
But the thing is, they *can* get laid. There are sex workers all over the globe willing to have sex for cash. The complainers want not just sex, but sex, for c****, with a person that meets his standards, who will love him (but not complicate his life with expectations), and will also contribute her income, do the cooking/cleaning, and raise their children. Oh, and she has to be "pure" or "a good woman", so the fact that she's having sex at all is an issue, much less charging for it.
There's sex to be had, they either don't want to pay for it, or can't wade through the dating apps to get it for "free". It is definitely harder for guys to get a date, but getting sex has never been easier.
89
Additional_Teacher45Mar 23, 2026
+19
Ironically, there are none of those purity restrictions or life complications when it comes to casual sodomy with another man. It gets touted as 'pleasure without sin'.
Which is why Grindr crashes when a GOP convention comes to town.
19
SillyAlternative420Mar 23, 2026
+13
Every time I hear about the heritage foundation and then consider the accusations from the right of how the left are a bunch of violent terrorists... It amazes me how their HQ still stands tall.
(Or maybe the left *aren't* violent at all)
13
Northman-66Mar 23, 2026
+356
The reason the birth rate is declining is because Republican chucklefucks keep giving tax breaks to their billionaire friends, while screwing the lower and middle class, making it unaffordable for more and more Americans to have children!!
356
JrSoftDevMar 23, 2026
+57
They love offering retrograde solutions to problems they purposefully create.
57
CanadianODST2Mar 23, 2026
+11
Fertility rates have been dropping across the developed world basically since industrialization with a few spikes here and there.
11
ajobforeveryhourMar 23, 2026
+162
Some of us who grew up in Christian nationalism and got out of it have been screaming this is what they want for over a decade just to be told we're being hysterical idiots who don't know what we're talking about. All I can say at this point is that I was raised so conservatively that when I went to Iran the rules felt normal to me, so good luck.
162
ScootyMcTrainhatMar 23, 2026
+34
30 years here.
34
gustavessidehoeMar 23, 2026
+7
Yeah, it kind of frustrates me how no one seems to know about this. I did a paper in college about Christian Dominionism. I have no idea how I got that subject, other than I took a comparative religion class as an elective and somehow stumbled on the idea during research.
You should have seen the look on all my classmates faces when I told them about Rushdoony (sp?) and that there’s been a decades long slow infiltration of the government by those sorts.
You’d have thought I was wearing a tinfoil hat screaming about the apocalypse.
7
Historical_Bend_2629Mar 23, 2026
+100
Nothing new. The dream is to have permanent second class citizens, not welcome in the sphere of politics unless it is to oppress other women.
100
kadmylosMar 23, 2026
+128
Next administration should declare the Heritage Foundation a terrorist organization.
128
G-Unit11111Mar 23, 2026
+197
The Heritage Foundation is truly evil AF. They must be stopped at all costs.
197
fredandlunchboxMar 23, 2026
+22
Make a 40 year plan and start on it now. That’s what they would do.
22
drwhogwartsMar 23, 2026
+9
Yes!!!!
9
MaligatorMom2Mar 23, 2026
+112
We are simultaneously responsible for the continuation of humanity and not deserving of an education, fulfillment, autonomy or respect.
We are not f****** incubators.
112
IdontgoonToastMar 23, 2026
+36
At some point they should be branded as a terrorist organization. Won't happen while the current admin is in power, but hopefully soon after.
36
ConstantStatisticianMar 23, 2026
+38
If a stable birth rate cannot be achieved without the oppression of women and their rights, the birth rate should be even lower. A society that can only exist on oppression shouldn't exist at all.
38
SeeingEyeDugMar 23, 2026
+35
How does this work when our entire economy has shifted to needing 2 incomes to survive?
35
Faux-FoeMar 23, 2026
+19
Especially when a lot of us have to do 2 incomes per person just to rent a prison cell sized home for 80% of our income.
19
awhaleinawellMar 23, 2026
+88
Feminism is what made me feel safe and comfortable having children.
Patriarchy and the erosion of reproductive rights are what compelled me to get sterilized.
88
specialkk77Mar 23, 2026
+19
Mine and my husband’s original plan was for him to get a vasectomy after my second pregnancy. Which turned out to be fraternal twins, and I changed the plan to sterilize myself instead. No way was I taking any chances in case the fuckwads in charge decided to go full Handmaids Tale.
Don’t regret that choice one but the way things are going.
19
angrygirl65Mar 23, 2026
+31
It’s not a new plan. This was their plan before a bunch of idiots voted in the felon
31
Floreat_democratiaMar 23, 2026
+27
Can anyone explain the contradictory nature of this proposal and the paradox of those who support it? They want to eliminate jobs by the millions with AI, and also reduce government spending on people and services, while at the same time promoting higher rates of reproduction in a society that doesn't prioritize or value human workers. Someone make this make sense.
27
Own-Librarian-9699Mar 23, 2026
+12
Didn't you read the footnotes? God will provide. Or Santa. One or the other.
12
theticklistMar 23, 2026
+26
Basically they are going to do to us, what the Iranian regime did to their people. A whacko religious fundamentalist slave state. —- only in Jesus’ name
Great job, Trailer Trash MAGAs
26
nasorrty346tfrgserMar 23, 2026
+136
White MAGA women, Gay repubplican, Latino Trump supporters.
Three voting block that I guess I will never understand for my whole life
136
Seaweed-BasicMar 23, 2026
+46
Chickens for chicken nuggets!
46
Own-Librarian-9699Mar 23, 2026
+27
Texan women were united in transferring all their reproductive rights to their rapists. It can't be rationalized.
They simply believe their rapist is superior and if he chooses them to force breed they have no agency and must comply.... And further, they, women, should be killed if they abort the rapists baby. They believe their life is merely a vessel for rapists to breed with.
The male governor and the male attorney general, who will soon be a senator, were surrounded by women smiling as Texas became the first official r*** friendly state since 1971.
27
Terrible_turtle_Mar 23, 2026
+52
>If women aren’t producing enough children, the answer is not to make parenthood easier with things like child care, paternal and maternal leave and education subsidies. The answer is to make women’s independence harder.
52
aStonedTargaryenMar 23, 2026
+50
coolcoolcool I plan to not have kids even harder now
50
greenman5252Mar 23, 2026
+44
It’s the same plan they’ve always had. Saved you a click
44
AdHopeful3801Mar 23, 2026
+25
This plan wasn’t new even when Phyllis Schlafly was pushing it.
Leave aside that American citizens might not all get behind rolling back every equal rights gain since 1950 for a moment, although it ought to be obvious that some of us didn’t think The Handmaids Tale was an instruction manual. And just concern yourself, briefly, with the underlying economics of this moment.
Corporate enshittifcstion has crept into every sphere of business, with subscription models and various attempts to capture and hold consumers through ongoing fees and controlled access substituting for such things as making a decent product, shrinkflatiin reducing sizes while prices stay high, and quality in decline. Wages have been falling behind costs for years. Oligarchs and financial engineers come up with ever more creative ways to extract every last dime from the worker to enrich themselves. The automated surveillance of Amazon’s workers is what happens when Taylorism meets utter disregard for the humanity of the employee. Small numbers of software brokers get rich off gig labor, commodifying insecurity and lack of a future as “flexibility” and “independence”.
The Heritage Foundation surely does want to torture American women out of the work force. They are also bankrolled by precisely the same capitalist forces that want everyone in America in the formal labor force so that capital can profit from that labor. And certainly the same capitalists who, if someone is making enough to support some kids, thinks that someone is making too much. I wonder if anyone over there even notices the vast gulf between their two competing ideological poles?
25
GuacsalsaquesoMar 23, 2026
+56
I’m rewatching Scandal, and the Republicans on that show are downright the same ideologically to Bernie Sanders at this rate. They keep warning “what if” if the religious nut job Vice President ever becomes President and what they imagine is not even close to how bad we are experiencing life right now.
I know it’s a fictional show, but we have degraded as a society so much since 2011.
56
jpurdyMar 23, 2026
+17
Paul Weyrich’s Heritage Foundation, the most influential never elected man in modern history, the father of the religious right and the billionaires who fund them, the architect of the Second U.S. Civil War.
https://www.jractivist.com/post/the-second-u-s-civil-war-began-in-the-1960s
https://www.jractivist.com/post/big-lies-abortion-guns-voter-fraud-socialism-immigrants-critical-race-theory
17
GoldenC0mpanyMar 23, 2026
+16
MAGA men want the Handmaid’s Tale to become reality.
16
SneakyDeaky123Mar 23, 2026
+14
How long before we as a society realize these people are just pure evil. Literally, objectively, pure evil. If you disagree with me, you’re one of them.
14
ssdsssssss4drMar 23, 2026
+16
What the f*** is wrong with these people??? Like how are some people this insecure that their need for power undermines every single joy in life. These asshats' need for divisiveness is downright disgusting.
16
Ok_Yogurt_9862Mar 23, 2026
+9
Its evil.
This is the evil that every fairytale, superhero comic, and religious texts the world over prepared you for.
That's what's wrong with them.
9
raouldukesaccompliceMar 23, 2026
+14
What conservatives don't want to tell you is why many social support programs allegedly "penalize" marriage.
When the modern welfare state was created in the mid-20th century, it was conservatives who opposed giving aid to married couples, because they believed it would encourage "idleness" among men and that ultimately it was a married woman's husband's responsibility to support her and their children, not the government's. It was a very Victorian "widows and orphans only" approach to the safety net.
14
Zealousideal_Look275Mar 23, 2026
+37
Fertility rate drop is mostly a function of teen pregnancy dropping and dragging the average with it. The pedos want to reverse that
When a Democrat comes back to power, they need to declare the Heritage Foundation a domestic terrorist organization & have it disbanded...
28
Own-Librarian-9699Mar 23, 2026
+11
Which is why democrats will soon be designated domestic terrorists. Maga knows exactly what is at stake. Bannon said it clearly, it's do or die. In no world can they allow elections to put them in prison. They will burn the world down before dying in prison.
We let the worst vampires in the world into power and no diplomacy or election will stop them. There is not a diplomatic resolution to this.
11
AncienTleeOnezMar 23, 2026
+11
Fathers support daughters until they marry. Once married, her focus is home & children. No more double-income families, so men's wages better be getting a LOT higher and/or houses and cars a LOT cheaper. If she's unable to have children, does he divorce her?
If the husband loses his job, gets injured, or dies, she will not be able to support the family. Return to parents? Welfare? And down the road, won't poorer families begin to consider girl babies a liability? We all know where that goes.
11
LockNo2943Mar 23, 2026
+10
Oh look, it's my favorite hate group...
10
VikingMonkey123Mar 23, 2026
+10
When does the world declare the heritage foundation a terrorist organization? I vote for whichever democratic candidate champions this.
10
maytrxxMar 23, 2026
+10
We’ve gone over this….. “my body, my choice”! Having to have this same conversation over and over again is exhausting!
Women who want to have babies and spend their days cooking, cleaning, volunteering, and doing whatever they want, should be able to do so. And those who don’t want to have babies, should not be forced to do so. Restricting abortions doesn’t eliminate this option, it just makes it harder to obtain and less safe (ie: coat hangers were literally being used to abort babies years ago).
And blaming the feminist movement for less babies is wild! Everyone knows it’s impossible to live in this economy and it’s just getting worse. 15 years ago good daycare was $250 a week. I can’t even imagine what it is now. And the cost of food, gas, electricity, and everything is higher than ever!!! No one can afford kids!
And our workforce is smaller due to COVID, the aging population, and now shrinking even faster bc ICE is deporting legal immigrants and citizens. So, if women are suppose to have babies and stay home, whose going to do all the work??
The Heritage Foundation and Project 2025 supporters are obviously not thinking through their terrible plans. We’ve been down all of these roads before and none of them lead anyway good!
Let’s stop trying to turn back time, and start looking ahead and building a future that’s brighter for everyone! Regardless of age, sex, religion, ability, and every other protected quality.
And release the Trump files!
10
Ok_Candy_9372Mar 23, 2026
+9
Hey remember all those people saying Project 2025 was a hoax and it was just alarmist nonsense?
So where are those people now?
9
PdxduckmanMar 23, 2026
+9
reminder that the heritage foundation wouldn't exist without Coors. Stop buying/drinking coors owned products.
9
PoutineCuratorMar 23, 2026
+10
What's funny here to a non US citizens, is that the USA is gonna go through what the Middle East have gone through after the Islamic revolution but instead with their own twisted version of Christianity. They will live in the same world as the people they hate so much.
10
stripmallparadiseMar 23, 2026
+8
How is this new? It’s been public before the 2024 election.
8
Vast_Locksmith98Mar 23, 2026
+8
You know we could have Star Trek like tech if all the money we spent on finding new ways to kill people and used it on education and social programs.
8
Doctor_DisasterMar 23, 2026
+8
All of this was laid out plain as day within *Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise* (Project 2025).
We kept warning people all this shit was at stake but nooooo, they told us we were "overreacting."
8
math-yooMar 23, 2026
+7
It’s like these people have never read Greek literature. Do you think women have no say in how this will turn out?
7
1800-5-PP-DOO-DOOMar 23, 2026
+8
Here is a summary:
The Specific Policy Proposals
The article lays out a concrete list of what the blueprint actually calls for:
Reshaping tax policy to reward large married families while cutting support for single mothers.
Eliminating child care incentives that enable women to work outside the home.
Legal frameworks that would effectively ban IVF by granting embryos legal rights at fertilization.
Criticizing no-fault divorce — the laws that made it easier for women to leave abusive marriages.
8
Own-Librarian-9699Mar 23, 2026
+7
People call me an adrenaline junkie but having a kid today, especially a girl in America, is nearly sadistic.
7
-Plunder-Bunny-Mar 23, 2026
+6
What helps the population grow is actually allowing tech to do what it should be doing... making peoples lives easier and allowing us to spend less time at work to focus on ourselves, our families, our friends and our passions.
Instead we've allowed tech to show "Higher ups" that we can keep pushing ourselves further to exceed bullshit time crunches, quota's and etc with as few workers as necessary all for shit pay and funny trinkets. Forcing us to be stressed and unable to look for better opportunities.
I'm not even 40 and I need knee replacement surgery because for the past 10 years I was forced to work 80hr weeks as a utility Locator, hitting records of tickets completed in the company's entire searchable digital history... If I didn't do the work, I was at risk of getting a damage on the project and getting fired or worse, potentially killing someone.
Meanwhile my boss is asking me to do more overtime, telling me to do more and more, despite me doubling his own output just 2 years prior and telling him I physically cannot keep this pace up.
Even with those hours and my pay, I have less than $200 in my account, barely any personal posessions, and rely on a lot of free content for my entertainment, because I had no time to even cook for myself and was over-reliant on restaurants and such... now I'm at a point where if I don't get a supervisor position or find an entry level desk-job that pays the same as what I earn with my 80hrs, I may as well give up, because I likely wont be able to walk once I hit 40.
6
StreetiebirdMar 23, 2026
+8
Maybe address the economic problems if you want people to be able to afford children. Otherwise you will spawn another generation of dysfunctional families who will be prone to crimes of desperation.
Healthcare, education, and economic opportunities are what creates happy functional families, and safe prosperous societies.
Super simple stuff.
8
CanadianSpeaksMar 23, 2026
+7
this is christo-taliban. welcome to United States of Afghanistan 🥲
7
Automatic-Term-3997Mar 23, 2026
+6
Can we like, just go to the Heritage Foundation main campus and just burn everyone down with a flamethrower? They’re trying to burn down our country, let’s start with them.
6
ApprehensiveYak3287Mar 23, 2026
+6
There is absolutely no reason for anyone to add more workers to this corrupt system. I look around and see babies and toddlers everywhere and just wonder how anyone can bring children into the world right now. The solution is not to increase the population. It's clear that a decrease in population is needed. The upper echelon only wants more workers so they can continue to have larger and larger profits until the end of time. It's all disgusting.
6
7ECAMar 23, 2026
+6
Heritage Foundation should just reveal their real name: American Taliban
6
Queasy_Eggplant9155Mar 23, 2026
+7
Anyone who supports & defends this is a giant f****** loser!
7
albatrossSKYMar 23, 2026
+6
This is so ass backwards it’s crazy to think a person with access to this much information would fall for something like this
6
DogLost13Mar 23, 2026
+6
Not new.
6
Blankboo97Mar 23, 2026
+6
Before tossing women back barefoot to American kitchens, jobs would have to pay well enough for a married male to afford a wife and kiddies, which will never happen with the current regime.
6
NernoxxMar 23, 2026
+6
Ah yes, the Taliban method of birth rate correction.
6
millershanksMar 23, 2026
+17
Why do men hate women so much?
The answer to all of this would be simple if women would simply not put up with such men.
17
r10tm4ch1n3Mar 23, 2026
+11
Rooted in that they can say: no.
11
catsarehere77Mar 23, 2026
+11
It's because women are refusing to put up with some of these men. Men who have nothing to offer a woman are struggling to date and it's all being blamed on women and their independence.
11
FormerUsenetUserMar 23, 2026
+10
They don't want more babies. They want women out of the workforce. The easiest way to do that is to saddle women with so many kids they can't work outside the home.
If the right wing wanted more babes, they'd be supporting kids with things like education and food and, other stuff. Oh, and vaccinations so those kids don't die of childhood diseases or be permanently disabled.
10
Healthy_Advance_2717Mar 23, 2026
+11
I actually read through the Heritage Foubdation’s slop. It’s wayyyyy way way more anti-lgbt than it is anti-women’s rights, although that’s definitely in there too. This however is basically a playbook to undo every civil rights gain the lgbt community has received since the 60s. They want to undo obergefell, make it illegal to be trans, make it so gay people can’t adopt children, make it so it’s legal to discriminate and hate anyone who is lgbt, and it does a ton of fearmongering saying that the left wants to legalize marrying three or more people, and make test tube babies the standard and end natural pregnancy. Absolutely insane.
11
CockBrotherMar 23, 2026
+15
It's a good thing Trump has never heard of Project 2025.
Would hate to see any of those terrible policies enacted.
15
Pantalaimon_IIMar 23, 2026
+14
soundtrack to the end of the world: “Good Boy” by Paris Paloma
“I knew one day I'd have to watch powerful men burn the world down /
I just didn't expect them to be such losers
I have never seen submission embodied half so well /
As in, the feeble competition between men with souls to sell
And I've never seen a guard dog with less fearsome of a bite /
Than with its tail between its legs found at the rich's man side
Look at him, he's sweating, he's sweating from the climb /
Office worker, soldier, CEO, he's bleedin' and he's blind /
And I've never seen a creature more pitiful than him /
He drinks power like saltwater, all because he cannot swim
Mouths open, servants of a higher power /
They told him, it's a staircase, it's a tower /
Full circle, wagging tails, wearing a collar /
Poor madman, that's what happens when you drink saltwater
Burned your tongue too early and realised too late /
The tragedy of losing everything you'll never taste /
The clearness of the river, the honey on her tongue /
Door open to communion, bein' your father's son
And I would not expect you to witness what we know /
The songs sung in the dark times, the fire and the snow /
We'll be piling up our pyre and defend your lords /
And we'll have our joy, but it'll never be yours
Mouths open, servants of a higher power (ha) /
They told him, it's a staircase, it's a tower /
Full circle, wagging tails, wearing a collar (ha) /
Even the dogs know not to drink saltwater
Good boy, you're working exactly as intended /
Has the penny dropped? You're never gonna get it /
Unrewarded for all of your defending /
From your loneliness epidemic
Good boy, has any of the money trickled down yet? /
You say one day you'll be rich, well, tell me how then /
Unpaid marketing department for the power /
Good boy, good boy
Oh-oh, good boy
Good boy”
14
Ok_Key_4731Mar 23, 2026
+5
That is frightening
5
yeahnoyeahsureMar 23, 2026
+5
They should try giving people more money to live off of. It just may work
5
ricketytrailerMar 23, 2026
+5
Natalism and fascism: a love story
5
GreyBeardEngMar 23, 2026
+6
Let me guess, don't work, don't vote, don't talk, spit out babies?
199 Comments