· 199 comments · Save ·
For Sale Apr 9, 2026 at 2:18 PM

'The Reality Is Avatar 3 Did OK but as a Cultural Force, It's Exhausted' — James Cameron Reportedly Discussing Ways to Make Avatar 4 and 5 Cheaper and Shorter

Posted by darth_vader39


'The Reality Is Avatar 3 Did OK but as a Cultural Force, It's Exhausted' — James Cameron Reportedly Discussing Ways to Make Avatar 4 and 5 Cheaper and Shorter
IGN
'The Reality Is Avatar 3 Did OK but as a Cultural Force, It's Exhausted' — James Cameron Reportedly Discussing Ways to Make Avatar 4 and 5 Cheaper and Shorter
After making $1.5 billion at the global box office, you’d imagine Avatar: Fire and Ash’s commercial performance would guarantee Avatar 4 and 5. But according to a new report, Disney is weighing up the franchise’s future, and may even cancel plans for an Avatar expansion at a theme park.

🚩 Report this post

199 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
brattysweat 4 days ago +570
Invest in miniatures and some costumes
570
Appollix 4 days ago +149
Great idea! Avatar 4 starts off with the camera panning down over some miniatures, dice, and sheets of paper with the characters names on them. The camera zooms out to revealing a gaming basement and the entire plot has been a DnD style Sci-Fi RPG the whole time. You can introduce a new character as the Dungeon Master but otherwise have the same actors playing their real life counterparts.
149
tvnr 4 days ago +14
That would be hilarious
14
Lord_Darksong 4 days ago +14
Use flat minis you print yourself and he can save even more money!
14
omgFWTbear 3 days ago +1
> DnD style Sci-Fi RPG *Traveler* was right there!
1
naruda1969 4 days ago +5
Claymation
5
Flashy_Jello_9520 4 days ago +2
And a screenplay.
2
LordXak 4 days ago +648
Its a sad state of affairs where a movie can make over 1 billion dollars and thats just "OK". Thats an insane amount of money. The whole industry is fucked if thats where they're at.
648
NoTitleChamp 4 days ago +318
While yes that's a problem Avatar doesn't really fall into that. Spending over a decade developing two expensive movies isn't the norm.
318
This_Elk_1460 4 days ago +171
Also it's not like Avatar has the merchandising income of Marvel. Yeah the original Avatar might have made more money at the box office than Endgame but it's not selling billions of dollars of blue people merch.
171
m0rbius 4 days ago +73
Also, a huge difference between how a Marvel movie looks being 80% CGI ahots and how Avatar looks being 99% CGI shots. Avatar is how a movie can look given nearly unlimited time, artistry, and resources. Marvel is always on a time crunch with all their movies.
73
moby__dick 3 days ago +8
Bruce Banner’s floating head would disagree
8
persianx6_ 3 days ago +6
Between the first and second movie the industry and consumers moved in tremendously different paths than before. They’ve done a really bad job of marketing the last two movies. Personally I think it’s similar now to how the Matrix ended business wise. By the time they got to theatres there were just better movies to watch.
6
IceLord86 3 days ago +15
The fact that 2 and 3 are basically just the same movie, complete with near identical third acts, doesn't elicit a lot of faith that there needs to be more of these films. I'd say figure out how to do one more to finish off the story of Sully and his family, then down the road Disney can bring in someone to expand the world and do more films on a more modest scale.
15
ElephantParticular10 3 days ago +2
I feel like Sully should have died in the third one. I'm not interested in his journey anymore, I am invested in the kids and the world at large. I will always stand up for Avatar 1 & 2 against the lazy criticisms that come up but the third for me for some reason assumed that we'd all be rooting for Sully to be whoever he wants to be without having to change or grow.
2
Jobriath 4 days ago +13
Marvel has a bunch of interesting looking characters that people may enjoy who don’t even know the source. Wolverine is cool whether or not you’ve seen a movie or comic book. The Hulk is awesome. I could go on. What does Avatar have? A human and some blue humanoids who look alike. You can’t branch off from there.
13
OzymandiasKoK 3 days ago +3
Sure you can. You got the regular ones, the water ones, and the fire ones!
3
bmcapers 4 days ago +5
Maybe merch is the wrong lens. Could be selling Disney Park tickets.
5
ldg25 4 days ago +24
The number of people swayed by the inclusion of Avatar in the park is probably in the dozens.
24
Wow_ImMrManager 4 days ago +15
DOZENS!!
15
omgFWTbear 3 days ago +2
I thought their traveling show did well. Isn’t Blue Man Group still touring?
2
MountainTwo3845 3 days ago +3
the parks make an insane amount of profit.
3
xamott 3 days ago +2
It only grossed more than Endgame because he brought it back into the f****** theaters for no reason, decades later.
2
shartaculor 1 day ago +2
The reason is that my wife never got to experience the first in IMAX 3d. We were willing to pay to see it again, as were many others. No regrets, it holds up and looks better than endgame, despite coming out a decade earlier. 
2
LurkerBurkeria 4 days ago +54
All of AAA entertainment is this way now, it has to make all the money, so much money it absorbs everyone else's sales, colossal monocultural juggernaut on par with stuff like lotr, got, or fortnight Anything else and its a massive flop and time to fire everyone. Its an absolutely deranged way to produce high budget entertainment
54
Giovan_Doza 4 days ago +21
That's how audiences perceive it. Not studios. That's why superman is a success, despite people bashing it for not making a billion. Avatar is an outlier. Since the cost of producing needs a billion just to BREAK EVEN
21
Fishb20 3 days ago +6
Are you telling me the guy who used the phrase AAA movies doesn't know what he's talking about
6
inksmudgedhands 4 days ago +29
Not really when the movie costs around four hundred million to make. You have to double that and toss in another hundred million or so to cover the production cost, the theater cut and the promotional cost. The problem is this movie was extremely expensive to make because of the tech and the man power used. This isn't a, "Let's slap something together using Blender over a couple of weeks." Instead, we have a movie using the latest tech by some of the most talented special effects artists out there. And they are taking their sweet time to get it right. Time is money. If they want to cut corners, I have no idea what they could cut. I doubt there is much waste in this case. Cameron has been thinking out this world since the late 70's. What we are seeing on screen is his passion project. Just one very expensive one.
29
Character-Solution-7 4 days ago +26
It would help to have an interesting story instead of just being a visual spectacle. They’ve spent so much on the effects and thought that would be enough to capture fans. I saw the first two in theaters. Rewatched the first one maybe twice and didn’t bother to watch the second again. It took a decade to make a visually stunning very boring story
26
inksmudgedhands 4 days ago +7
Oh, I agree. I am not into the movies. Cameron has been so focused not on just visual but making this planet a literal living and breathing environment that the story of the characters in it have taken a distant back story. I feel like he wanted to make this world in the way David Attenborough wants to make a nature documentary but along the way Cameron realized that he needed to attach a story to it. And, frankly, he is not good of a storyteller outside of the science aspects of it. Mind you, the science aspects are amazing. But they don't really leave you yearning for more once you've seen that world. There are only so many times you can go, "Yep, that's an alien ocean," without going, "So, what's the point of these characters anyway?"
7
SuperUranus 3 days ago +2
I’ve always said that Avatar would work better as a Planet Pandora documentary. Haven’t seen the third movie but the second one absolutely felt like a nature documentary with a story tacked on.
2
krispyboiz 3 days ago +7
>Cameron has been thinking out this world since the late 70's. What we are seeing on screen is his passion project I know that is the case, but it's a little funny hearing that when the movies are often panned for their lack of depth in the story department. They're definitely spectacles, but you'd think something that he's been thinking out for so long would be able to have three pretty distinct stories instead of three stories that people found pretty same-y
7
fillinthe___ 4 days ago +3
It’s not even the astronomical time and energy being spent in production, it’s the HUGE investment Disney is making into the franchise. They’re building out a whole new section at their parks that’s Avatar themed. If you burn out people’s attention and care about the franchise, that investment goes bust too. I think this is less “the franchise is failing” and more “let’s stop before it’s too late and we lose interest.”
3
Positive-Drawing-281 4 days ago +3
Took like 400 million just to make it and probable 150 million to promote it.
3
Ok_Nefariousness9736 4 days ago +4
That’s the problem when you start so high and stay high (the first two), at some point it’s going to go down and going down from 2.3 billion to 1.4 billion is something investors don’t like… even if it did make a good profit.
4
TrueLegateDamar 4 days ago +7
This. It cost nearly double what the original did but made half it's profit. And there's a good chance a fourth movie make will even less given how many felt the third was a remix of the first and second movies.
7
Ponchorello7 4 days ago +4
The movie's budget was huge, but the marketing is what kills them. Depending on the movie and the hype around it, marketing could *easily* surpass a film's production budget. I'm not saying that's the case for the Avatar movies, but factoring that in, the box office returns might seem less impressive to the studio. And all they need for a disaster is for just one of these to underperform.
4
JohnnyGeniusIsAlive 4 days ago +2
That's not what he's saying and he's not wrong. If you want a healthy film industry, you probably should be suspicious of the Avatar films. Think about how many other movies could be made with their budgets.
2
antbates 3 days ago +2
It’s also opportunity cost for James Cameron. It’s a matter of if he could be producing something else that is more culturally and financially significant
2
jcgonzmo 3 days ago +3
ACtually in this case it is not an industry problem. It is a James Cameron problem. The more expensive a movie is, the more you have to sell to make money. Mario Galaxy cost 120 million to make. Marketing budget is usually double that. So in total it was 240 million. Revenue is going to be probably around the same ball park as the original Bros movie, 1.3 billion. In addition, Mario movie improve sales or merchandise like clothing ,accessories, toys, games, etc. Now lets go to Avatar 3. Avatar 3 made 1.48 billion. It cost, production plus marketing, in between 500-600 million. It cost 2.5 times more than Mario to generate almost the same amount of revenue. In addition, you do not sell that much merchandise as Mario does. Making Avatar 3 is just bad business. Avengers: Endgame cost around the same, but at least that franchise has good post movie merchandise sales.
3
Ponchorello7 4 days ago +190
Cultural force? The movie's are wildly successful, but their cultural impact seems to be that they come around every once in a while, impress everyone on a technical level and are subsequently forgotten.
190
Iginlas_4head_Crease 3 days ago +57
Avatar 1 captured the zeitgeist. It was a huge water cooler movie. But that's because it came out in 2009 when things still did that. Very few things at all, let alone movies, capture majority of society any more.
57
ZroDgsCalvin 3 days ago +39
True, but it didn’t last, it had no staying power. Avatar as a moviegoing event captured the zeitgeist, Avatar the story did no such thing. There have absolutely been, and continue to be culturally important, impactful movies that have real staying power. Avatar isn’t, and has never been that.
39
Iginlas_4head_Crease 3 days ago +11
Which movies? To me it feels like marvel infinity wars basically was the finale to massive cultural stuff. Im talking like everybody quoting it, lining up for it etc Project hail Mary is a huge release that's doing amazing and still more than half the people I tell about it haven't even heard of it
11
MC_chrome 3 days ago +13
Barbenheimer was the last time society coalesced and came out in major numbers for a major movie event, I think. This particualar phenomenon was so successful that Disney is trying to immitate it with Dune and Doomsday this winter
13
Dasseem 3 days ago +2
Bloody Thanos had more memes in the first week of Avengers release than all of the Avatar movies. Let's think about that for one second.
2
johannthegoatman 3 days ago +3
It wasn't just the year, the sequels were way way worse
3
ContrarianRPG 3 days ago +8
I like to say "Avatar movies are like the Olympics. They're a big deal for two weeks, then everyone stops talking about them for 4 years."
8
Threadheads 3 days ago +2
Similarly I saw a critic describe the Avatar movies as the opposite of a cult film. Unlike Star Wars or LOTR they don’t have great rewatch potential at home. Apart from Neytiri they don’t have super memorable or beloved characters. They aren’t insanely quotable. It doesn’t have the same emotional pull that the aformentioned other franchises have. And there’s not a great lot of interest in the lore in and around the films.
2
MadMacs77 2 days ago +2
Yup. The first movie was an impressive display of 3D movie-making, and that was it.
2
youareprobnotugly 4 days ago +279
Perhaps tell a new story? Like wtf
279
warcraftnerd1980 4 days ago +118
Right? 2 and 3 were the exact same story. With the exact same bad guys. Let’s move past this. New story. New conflict.
118
Tomatillo12475 4 days ago +54
And the third one was the longest one in the franchise. I found the run time pretty offensive considering how uninteresting and rehashed the story was
54
entertainman 3 days ago +31
If you’ve never seen 2, 3 was pretty good
31
Dependent-Reveal2401 3 days ago +33
That's the best review I've seen about avatar 3.
33
entertainman 3 days ago +2
Maybe I was smart skipping 1 and 2 and going into 3 blind in theaters. Probably saw some parts of 1 on fox to understand some basic character dynamics.
2
MrSnarf26 3 days ago +15
They just repeated the same plot like 4 times over 2 movies with mostly lame characters
15
zxern 3 days ago +7
Seriously they should have started 2 out with Jake as an old man…how did the humans send in new troops and equipment so fast?
7
Dasseem 3 days ago +2
I still don't know the villain's name. I just know that it rhymes with Quidditch.
2
alilhillbilly 3 days ago +7
No they weren't. They're one single film split in two.
7
DieHarderDaddy 3 days ago +5
So a redundant film
5
factoid_ 3 days ago +3
Yeah it was really just an entirely redundant story. The problem wasn’t that avatar has lost its cultural momentum…Cameron just made a (rare for him) dud. It wasn’t a bad movie…it just didn’t push the story forward in a meaningful way.
3
MovieSock 4 days ago +10
2 and 3 were pretty much the same as 1, which was dogshit itself, which means all 3 were dogshit.
10
rjcarr 4 days ago +29
I was super impressed with the first film mostly for the technology. I remember seeing it playing at a friend’s house months later and thought it looked silly in 2D. Thought the first film was good enough to see the second, but I thought that was terrible. Tech was still great, but that’s not enough to interest me again. Now I have zero interest in seeing the third or anything else.
29
youareprobnotugly 4 days ago +8
Yes agree fully. The first film had something which was squandered.
8
AccomplishedLeave506 4 days ago +5
I've never understood the attraction of avatar. When I saw the first one I thought it was one of the most boring and obvious movies I'd ever seen. I was shocked they had made more. I guess a fair few people must have liked it.
5
rjcarr 3 days ago +2
The first was like a C- story with A+ tech. I guess I was hoping the second one would get a better story but it somehow got worse; I'd rate it like a D at best.
2
Tibbaryllis2 3 days ago +3
For me personally, I’m fine with the first movie having stunning visuals carrying a weak story. But I’m not sure calling #2 a D does it justice. It would have been fine it was just another meh story, but double (then triple) dipping the villain and story beats made it so much worse to the point of distracting.
3
PhatOofxD 3 days ago +2
The third is better than the second in the sense it's literally the same movie but better done. They really needed to have a new plot lol
2
DrawChrisDraw 3 days ago +7
No, I want to watch the Col Quaritch almost die, escape, and come back again to hunt Sully in the next movies at least two more times.
7
youareprobnotugly 3 days ago +7
James Cameron has made so many great movies. How does he not realize the writing here is such shit.
7
WickedCoolMasshole 3 days ago +3
Hire a writer. Seriously, he is terrible. His movies require the special effects to distract you from the absolute drivel coming out of the actors’ mouths.
3
Ok_Surprise_4090 4 days ago +21
He's an amazing, generational filmmaker. I just wish he hadn't spent the last 20 years of his passion and expertise on something so contrived and tepid. Dude should be making action blockbusters, not hyper-budgeted versions of 90s straight-to-VHS adventure fantasy movies.
21
FireZord25 4 days ago +60
A good writer would compensate well for downscale in other areas, like the visuals. Just saying as someone who didn't hate these movies.
60
Nerdlinger 4 days ago +16
Avatar 4 & 5: The MoleMan Chronicles. Set in the dark, dark cave world where no one can see anything.
16
warcraftnerd1980 4 days ago +7
And same bad guy is coming again. So original.
7
OneTwoFar_ 3 days ago +5
James Cameron is not a writer, he's an SFX guy who became a director and at times it really shows
5
ObviouslyJoking 4 days ago +2
As someone who only watched these for the visuals I don’t disagree, but I wouldn’t watch them.
2
Pen_dragons_pizza 4 days ago +2
I guess if they set it on earth they would be able to have actual sets or shoot on location with added cgi, rather than the approach they currently have of 100% cgi. Would save a bit of time and money I guess. At the end of the day though, Cameron just screwed up with the 3rd movie. If it was good and not just a rehash of the previous movies then it would have had people coming back and watching again. Instead I feel the reviewers of it being mid put people off, especially with such a long run time, I am a fan and I almost did not bother due to not wanting to sit that long.
2
jerem1734 4 days ago +5
Fire and Ash was originally the second half of way of water before he decided to keep increasing the length of the movie to the point that he split it in two. The derivativeness probably comes from that. They also originally planned to have the Navi use human weapons in the final battle but Cameron decided against it so they had to rehash the Avatar 1 final fight
5
Tibbaryllis2 3 days ago +2
> At the end of the day though, Cameron just screwed up with the 3rd movie. If it was good and not just a rehash of the previous movies then it would have had people coming back and watching again. I was a huge Avatar fan. I regularly re-watched it and enjoyed the world and even the story (for what it was, I also loved FernGully). I was completely over it when Avatar 2 was just a rehash with a completely predictable plot and the same literally bad guys. I didn’t even bother to watch 3 when it was reported it was just the same thing yet again in a different biome. I’ll probably catch it on streaming at some point. I especially disliked it when Cameron decided to do the Star Wars thing where the rebels won in part 1 and kicked the bad guys out. And then part 2 somehow still starts with the bad guys in control of everything again and the rebels largely as weak or weaker than they were before.
2
BigGrayBeast 4 days ago +62
Unpopular opinion, but I was not thrilled with the first one. I didn't think it was worthy of a sequel and I certainly didn't think it deserved to become a dynasty.
62
Tgirl0 3 days ago +13
I agree too. I also don't think this is an unpopular opinion, but it's just not outspoken enough. I saw the first one in the theaters and came out instantly thinking it wasn't a good movie at all. Graphics mean nothing to me when the story, itself, isn't strong/original (beyond the reused themes of Pocahontas/Wolves/Ferngully). Avatar may have made records in the box office, but I can barely remember seeing any Avatar merch or a giant fan base following these past many years. (Other than the Disney parks making Avatar lands...that no one asked for, but here we are.) The thoughts of lack of cultural relevancy is pretty much on point. Asides from one person, I know no one else, who thought of Avatar on a positive note or talked about it at all. I'm not surprised on the decrease of Avatar film sales per new movie. Cameron should've stopped at the first film, and help produce a sequel to the Alita film. I enjoyed Alita a lot more than Avatar for sure.
13
jonbodhi 3 days ago +8
I would also MUCH rather see another Alita, than whatever Avatar is supposed to be. I saw the original, thought it was a spectacle, and nothing more. When the sequel rolled around, I thought: ‘I guess I should rewatch the original first..:’ and realized I had ZERO desire to sit through it again, so I’ve never seen 2 & 3, and I’m just fine with that. I cannot comprehend how so much time and money has been expended for such a nothing story. According to what I’ve read here, the same story beats get repeated throughout. Why? There are dozens of sci-fi books I’ve read over the years that could be adapted; why this?
8
Tgirl0 3 days ago +4
Indeed. You pretty much nailed it. A "nothing story". That's what they are. I've been wondering that too on "why??" as well. When I look back on Titanic, even though it was using a familiar used trope of rich girl meets poor boy on a doomed ship, at least, there was some effort on the story plus a lot of practical film sets. Then, I look at Cameron's name, or a picture of his face, online, and have to ask it, "whyyy Avatar? And its sequels?" 😫
4
DistantStorm-X 3 days ago +6
Nope, totally with you. Saw it the one time in imax 3D for the novelty of the visual spectacle, which at that scale was indeed pretty cool. But that was it. Nothing about it made me want to either watch it again, or see anything more in that universe. Continues to blow my mind that one of the most accomplished and talented writer/directors of sci-fi/action blockbusters of the last 40 years, has chosen *this* project to devote like the last *two decades* of his cinematic career to. F****** wild.
6
TheMeticulousNinja 4 days ago +5
I agree
5
After_Arugula 3 days ago +5
I’ve literally heard a person describe Avatar as one of their favorite movies or franchises, or express excitement about one of its sequels. It seems to have no legacy in the public consciousness yet it’s made a jillion dollars. I truly don’t understand.
5
darkestb4thadawn 4 days ago +41
*Avatar 3* felt like the deleted scenes of *Avatar 2*. So yeah, he’s not wrong.
41
ThePromptWasYourName 4 days ago +17
Everyone saying Avatar 1 & 2 are the same are wrong... 2 is a very different movie with different themes. It's mostly about fatherhood & family, and Quorritch starting his arc toward possible redemption. Avatar 2 & 3 though, yeah those are basically the same. I think the series would have a lot more momentum and interest if 3 had been different. Keeping it so similar to the beats of Avatar 2 was just such a bizarre decision
17
Ok_Nefariousness9736 4 days ago +4
It wasn’t the same for the first part of the movie, which was great, but it eventually became the same after the captured Spider for the second time. The finale act should have been the attack on the city but with more Navi.
4
BGOOCHY 4 days ago +10
None of these movies have a story that could even remotely justify their runtime. Start there.
10
saibjai 4 days ago +8
Bro, you always introduce time travel in the fourth episode, and then you do multiverse in the fifth. Duh, james cameron.
8
ProgrammerOk1400 4 days ago +88
As a cultural force? Aside from the FX the whole series is utterly forgettable.
88
ObviouslyJoking 4 days ago +9
I stopped caring about the characters a few minutes after I watched these first film so many years ago. A lot of people are only there for the visual ride.
9
Shepherd77 4 days ago +4
Like when you jingle your keys for a baby or bird or something. Sure it’s meaningless, but they like to watch the shiny object.
4
V2Blast 3 days ago +3
I never started caring about them as I was watching the first movie, to be honest.
3
youareprobnotugly 4 days ago +11
What series?
11
erlend_nikulausson 4 days ago +4
The world series.
4
CurryKake 4 days ago +3
Avatar
3
BakedWizerd 4 days ago +11
The Last Airbender?
11
Tesseraktion 4 days ago +2
definitely not forgettable!
2
Equivalent-Shine5742 4 days ago +5
A Series of Unfortunate Events...
5
Keroxu_ 4 days ago +5
The Pandora series
5
SillyGoatGruff 4 days ago +6
Borderlands?
6
dickshitmclit 4 days ago +3
It's lacks proper symbols and factions for people to rally around that's why no one cares. All good Sci fi needs cool factions and cool symbols to represent those factions, avatar is a result of avoiding all of that.
3
CrimsonTyphoon0613 3 days ago +3
For sure! These fuckers used Papyrus as the title font.
3
THEbaddestOFtheASSES 4 days ago +13
If Jimmy had invested more time into crafting the story as he did for the technical aspects of these films maybe he wouldn’t be running into this issue now instead of later.
13
MovieSock 4 days ago +6
Dear Mr. Cameron - Maybe if you'd had better writers throughout you'd be doing better.
6
No_Team_6326 4 days ago +10
My kids forced me to watch this film with them a few days ago. Truth be told, if you turn your brain off, the three hours go by quite quickly and there are some good set pieces here and there. But it's now been about 10 days or so since we watched and I could not remember a single thing about it. That's your Avatar experience in a nutshell. Pretty, but so, so forgettable because there really is nothing memorable about them.
10
pseudoart 4 days ago +5
These movies are super forgettable. Pretty but empty. Hard to be a cultural force when it’s so bland.
5
Hey_Giant_Loser 4 days ago +16
It was never a "cultural force" it was always gimmick. And a weaksauce one at that
16
DirtyJon 4 days ago +12
Who is clamoring for these movies? I literally know ZERO people who give a shit about them.
12
Miguelohara099 4 days ago +2
I did not care to see Avatar 3 and so I didn’t. The 2nd was a very enjoyable experience, but that movie did not end with me dying to see more. When I really think about it, half the reason I wanted to see avatar two was to how the visuals looked after almost 15 years. This new one coming only two years after the last one did not have that added benefit of my curiosity for the visual effects. I’d be willing to bet I’m not the only one who thought that.
2
gls2220 4 days ago +2
Was it ever a cultural force? I've never seen much in the way of Listnook conversations about any of the movies. I think the first one came out and people went more because of the novelty of it. But in the intervening decade+ before the second movie came out, did anyone actually give a shit that it was taking so long? Does anyone actually care about any of these movies and their mythology? Is there anything enduring about them?
2
SvenLorenz 3 days ago +6
At what point was Avatar "a Cultural Force"?
6
Desperate-Scientist9 3 days ago +5
I have an idea, don’t make them
5
austinbarrow 4 days ago +11
Maybe because it was the same movie as the sequel, which was the same movie as the original, with slightly different-looking, blue creatures?
11
allisgray 4 days ago +8
Hire the WNBA and paint em blue or is that what already happens???
8
Beforemath 4 days ago +15
Try making a new story. Go to a new planet
15
exitparadise 3 days ago +3
Or some other aspect of the planet. The first one was fun because it was all new and you were learning about and seeing new world for the first time, and a major part of the plot hinged on that Alien culture. Now it's just Apocalypse Now with costumes.
3
CrissBliss 4 days ago +3
Do an animated series for Disney Plus
3
ShiftyShankerton 4 days ago +3
Just make Titanic 2 already!
3
Mr_Zee_Speaks 4 days ago +3
Don’t make the same movie 2 times?
3
avshalon 4 days ago +3
Avatar 3 was the first one I didn’t watch in the theater. It’s just kind of an exhausted idea…plus I’m constantly exhausted and broke because of all the nonsense going on in my country (US).
3
No_Measurement9981 3 days ago +3
Was it ever a cultural force, though? TItanic and Terminator were. This franchise is little more than Fern Gully on steroids.
3
GrownDandilion 3 days ago +3
Just let us rent fern gully ...
3
CherryCherry5 3 days ago +3
The thing is that *we do not need Avatar 4 and 5.*
3
copyrider 3 days ago +3
It felt obvious after Avatar 2 that the “cultural force” of the first movie was done.
3
UnfunnyTroll 3 days ago +3
How about not making them at all
3
Mayor_of_Voodoo 3 days ago +3
Or maybe not make them At all?
3
Mysterious-Wasabi103 4 days ago +13
I will never understand his obsession with making Avatar. Why do you need 5 chapters of the same tired ass story?
13
rhunter99 4 days ago +7
I hope 4 and 5 get made
7
MattyBeatz 4 days ago +9
It's never been culturally relevant IMO. Sells a ton of movie tickets but that seems about it. You never see merch out in the wild, people don't dress up like characters on Halloween or at ComicCons, there's no video games, IP licenses to Lego, trading cards, animated spinoffs for kids, or things like that. Disney is rethinking making an immersive world at its parks, like Galaxy's Edge or Wizarding World of Harry Potter. The fact that all 3 movies made over a billion dollars surprises me. But I think the biggest error was dropping 3 right after 2. Doesn't need to be a decade between movies but there was enough time between 1 and 2 that the tech got a chance to really evolve and people wanted the experience again.
9
vewfb 3 days ago +3
Well, Lego did make sets for the first and second movies when the second movie came out. The Lego sets sold horribly, so there weren't any Lego sets for the third movie.
3
Monkfich 4 days ago +2
We’re all going to be at a different stage in our lives if he really manages to get to film number 7. That’s maybe 12-15 years away. James Cameron might want to crack on with them - and make them quicker and shorter - simply to make it more likely that he’ll get to see them finish.
2
BustinMakesMeFeelMeh 4 days ago +2
There’s no excuse for how long these movies are. That’s why I didn’t see part 3. They could all be a full hour shorter.
2
m0rbius 4 days ago +2
I'd love to see the conclusion to the story. I also agree that Avatar doesn't have the cultural impact it thought it had. They're fun and stunning movies to watch and that's about it. They certainly don't need to be 3 hours long each. I'd say, make 4 and 5, make them each shorter and film both simultaneously. If they've developed the tech over the past movies, it should be cheaper to make these than the previous ones. Cut back on the R&D. These movies already look insanely good. You don't need to invest a huge fortune into that. Pick and choose what's important to innovate on. I think the next 2 films will do well, but not as well as the 1st or 2nd films. It might do better than the 3rd if they keep the budget under control. I hope they get made. I do enjoy the theatrical experience of watching them. There really aren't any other creators making stuff like this. Cameron is in a league all his own. We're lucky, as an audience, we even get stuff like this anymore.
2
TeccaChairCompany 4 days ago +2
I really don’t know what the difference between Avatar 2 and 3 is,
2
cyanide4suicide 4 days ago +2
No shit. You remade one of your movies twice with literally the same plot
2
DirtyAquaticApe 4 days ago +2
Avatar 3 felt way too much like a retread of 2. Visually it was stunning but nothing really changed in the universe from the start to the end of the e movie.
2
OneSeaworthiness7768 4 days ago +2
Avatar was never a cultural force. It had no impact on culture whatsoever except as a benchmark for the technology/CGI quality. The story and acting are terrible. There’s no reason it needs to go on for 4 or 5 or 7 films.
2
Particular-Taste-323 4 days ago +2
Why make them at all? Boring CGI c*** to me!
2
Proxelies 4 days ago +2
If I'm being honest the only thing Avatar related I've ever been impressed with was the Pandora section of Animal Kingdom at Disney World. I've only seen the first movie and, while it was visually stunning, I never understood why they'd spend so much money to tell such a bland story.
2
Adam__B 4 days ago +2
My problem with the Avatar series is they are so formulaic and boring. Why would you commit to this epic project, get billions allocated to making it, spare zero expense, but then make a plot that is just Dances With Wolves all over again, with dialogue cringier than your average Hallmark holiday movie.
2
KintsugiExp 4 days ago +2
He could be doing great things like Nolan or Villenueve, but NOOOOO he likes his blue pocahontas money. Nobody gives a shit.
2
-Wicked- 4 days ago +2
I'd probably rather see an Abyss sequel than another Avatar and I'd really rather not see an Abyss sequel.
2
Fidrych76 4 days ago +2
It’s just utter c*** 💩
2
Milestailsprowe 4 days ago +2
The movies are super long. I wanted to wait and watch it on Disney+ so I could pause
2
44-Worms 4 days ago +2
I mean, the wasn't a cultural behemoth either was it.. Some of the same old school, tepid liberal platitudes that we've seen in any other good coloniser stories for about a hundred years.
2
Abject-Cranberry5941 4 days ago +2
Way of water was so bad it killed the franchise
2
Juniperguy22 4 days ago +2
It was never a cultural force to begin with, no one talks about avatar at all, nor has it won any meaningful awards
2
Witty-Lawfulness2983 3 days ago +2
No, no more please. Three were more than enough. We're good.
2
spellbookwanda 3 days ago +2
Put a bit of craic into them, they’re so serious - plead, fight, beg, worry, hiss, fight, stoic speech, ad nauseum.
2
Mister_Squirrels 3 days ago +2
He could just not make them. Throwing that out there.
2
SpaceMonkeyNation 3 days ago +2
Just f****** stop. I'm amazed anyone is a fan of this shit.
2
franklycanadian 3 days ago +2
Better narrative & better dialogue please.
2
SeiriusPolaris 3 days ago +2
Cheaper and shorter? What about making them good?
2
drossvirex 3 days ago +2
Maybe you shoulda just did 3 movies.
2
Otm_Shank1 3 days ago +2
By not making them.
2
olearyboy 3 days ago +2
Saw 3hr+ said nah
2
Superteerev 3 days ago +2
I still havent finished the 2nd one. I fell asleep during it.
2
WhatsaRedditsdo 3 days ago +2
Worst movies series that made a billion, change my mind.
2
Outrageous_Divide129 3 days ago +2
THEY MADE A 3rd one?? WHY?
2
HateYourFaces 3 days ago +2
Even the first movie was exhausted…
2
Emmatornado 3 days ago +2
The first Avatar wasn’t a cultural force. It was a good model for what 3d could do in movies, but once it was out of theaters no one talked about it until the next movie was announced. It was spectacle, but not any kind of cultural touchstone.
2
Scary_Bushmonster 3 days ago +2
Stop making these f****** movies
2
KendrickBlack502 3 days ago +2
Or… just don’t make it
2
HappiPipo 3 days ago +2
Just stop making them. I was so underwhelmed by the first one I did not even bother watching the second and thirds ones.
2
WhenDuvzCry 3 days ago +2
I really wish he would just ditch the franchise and go back to being the guy that gave us monumental classics. So sick of these lifeless movies
2
eddie2hands99911 3 days ago +2
I just saw the trailer for another hunger games. There are absolutely no original ideas left to create movies with anymore.
2
ReasonableRadio8434 3 days ago +2
He should just not make it. It f****** sucks. Avatar robbed us of two decades without James Cameron.
2
donny321123 3 days ago +2
It was in interesting movie/concept, but I think referring to the avatar movies as a cultural force is a bit of a stretch.
2
ProtonPi314 3 days ago +2
Of course it's exhausted. The same storyline with the same guy trying to destroy the same planet. Find a new story to tell
2
BannedPomegranate 3 days ago +2
Do people actually like Avatar? I rarely see anything about it.
2
AnAnonymousSource_ 3 days ago +2
They saved a lot of money by reusing the same script for two movies. Can we assume there's going to be a third and fourth ocean whaling ship fight?
2
TraditionalMood277 3 days ago +2
You could just not make either. Boom. Problem solved.
2
gknight702 3 days ago +2
They should film them at the same time and make them only 2hrs. That would cut the budget in half. Or just end it with 4, JC barely moved the needle of the story over the last 2 films. What was even accomplished of significance story-wise in fire and ash?
2
threwordbotname 3 days ago +2
Maybe a one night only play in a school gym?
2
joshspoon 3 days ago +2
Use hand puppets.
2
SlapThatAce 3 days ago +2
Maybe don't make 4 and 5 and move on to something else?
2
HereforLeapDay 3 days ago +2
I don’t want another Avatar. Thanks anyway.
2
pixelbenderr 3 days ago +2
They are his worst movies. They are the film equivalent of watching Joe Satriani or Steve Vai work methodically across a fretboard - there's a reason their albums don't resonate with the broader public while being illustrative of peak technical proficiency.
2
Secret_Cabinet2348 3 days ago +2
I thought the first movie was ok, but definitely not as good as they try to market it as. There was really no reason for more of them.
2
Cool-Tangelo6548 4 days ago +5
Make them more interesting. The stories are 2 basic. And each film follows the same formula.
5
simpleflavors1 4 days ago +2
Then don't make 5 movies wtf
2
TheOmCollector 4 days ago +4
I have an idea. Don’t make them. They’re be really c**** then.
4
vperretta 4 days ago +3
Start by writing a good story. Tends to sort it self out from there.
3
ExcellentBed6019 4 days ago +5
Oh no who could have seen this coming except literally anyone who saw the first space pocahontas
5
Grizzybaby1985 4 days ago +4
Just bin it figured he would have got bored with it by now
4
TheSpaceman1975 4 days ago +2
I never saw a single one of these movies and not a single person has ever told me that I must go see them and that they love these films. Zero cultural relevance. Zero impact. Why would I want to watch a video game looking movie for 3 hours?
2
IsabellaGalavant 4 days ago +2
Just don't make them? I don't know anyone who's clambering for an *Avatar 4*.
2
Subject-Garlic-9742 4 days ago +2
I wish he would abandon Avatar and do more documentaries about the ocean and deep sea exploration- so much more interesting.
2
FastStill7962 4 days ago +2
Wait there’s avatar 2 ?
2
andy1908 4 days ago +1
No one cares about Avatar. Cameron tarnished his legacy with these goofy-ass movies.
1
rysker6 4 days ago +1
The problem is he’s dragged this on for almost two decades
1
AndrewH73333 4 days ago +1
Have Avatar 5 take place in a modern city. That will make it cheaper to film.
1
Vundal 4 days ago +1
It doesn't help that the movie plots are uninspired retreads of better stories and movies.
1
OrkidingMe 4 days ago +1
Does he HAVE ago make the other sequels? One movie was enough
1
← Back to Board