· 51 comments · Save ·
For Sale Apr 15, 2026 at 5:26 PM

The revisionist history attempt of people trying to gaslight others into believing Better Call Saul or Breaking Bad were "slow" is insane.

Posted by Wack0HookedOnT0bac0


I criticized Pluribus for being relatively slow and having almost zero intrigue or plot development from ep 2-5. After that people bombarded by saying BB and BCS were slow too. That's an insanely inaccurate take that is either commented by AppleTV bots/marketing campaign or people are trying to justify some sort of copium complex. BB kicks you in the face with intensity and intrigue immediately. There is no better pilot than that show. Breaking Bad and Better Call Saul have plot movement and development throughout every single episode and almost every episode leaves you intrigued by what's to happen next. Idk what Vince was going for with Pluribus but I'm shocked at how much of a let down that show is. The pacing is aggravating, the way Rhea Seahorn over acts in almost every scene is disappointing considering how great of an actress she was in BCS, and the other characters were not selected in the same approach as BB or BCS. I feel like the casting for those two shows were done so perfectly and the characters were crafted to perfection. Pluribus characters have no juice

🚩 Report this post

51 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
ElasticPlatypus Apr 15, 2026 +22
This seems like the thing that you should have responded to the person who you were arguing with via comment, instead of dragging all of the television sub into this
22
PreferenceAnxious449 Apr 15, 2026 +45
i feel like if you're gonna use the word gaslight so flippantly you probably shouldn't use the word insane so flippantly too
45
boytoyahoy Apr 15, 2026 +6
Gaslight is so overused that it's lost all meaning
6
Mem2Chi91 Apr 15, 2026 +7
It’s never meant anything at all! Did your stupid friends tell you that it did? /s
7
EagleForty Apr 15, 2026 +2
Most people don't understand the difference between "gaslighting" and "lying" or "disagreeing".
2
Late-Development276 Apr 15, 2026
rhea seahorn was incredible in bcs so seeing her overact in pluribus is genuinely disappointing, like what happened there. also people definitely say bb was slow when they're trying to defend whatever show they're currently watching but episode 1 literally has walt in his underwear with a gun so idk how that's slow
0
Look_its_Rob Apr 15, 2026 +1
Yeah I dont consider Breaking Bad a slow burn but BCS was IMO. 
1
TheSecondEikonOfFire Apr 15, 2026 +21
I mean, BCS is slow in my opinion. It took me multiple tries to get through the first season because I think it’s so poorly paced and takes a long time to really get interesting. Your opinion isn’t the objectively right one
21
BIGD0G29585 Apr 15, 2026 +3
Better Call Saul was definitely a slow burn. I loved it but it didn’t grab you like BB did. I do think it ended up being a better show overall though.
3
Plane-Tie6392 Apr 15, 2026 +2
100%. I was just about to bring up that it took me several tries to get into BCS myself. 
2
[deleted] Apr 15, 2026 +7
[deleted]
7
Tylertheguyler Apr 15, 2026 +1
Yeah, I loved both BCS and Pluribus, I think deliberate pacing is something that's died off with the fast money approach that netflix propagates. Give me more multi-season arcs and character development please
1
Mysterious_Field1517 Apr 15, 2026 +3
The pacing was something missing for me in Pluribus. BCS was slow but gradually ramping up each episode and season. Pluribus starts with a bang and proceeds to decrease the tempo to the point; where I don't think even writers know what to do with the initial cool idea.
3
Cipher-IX Apr 15, 2026 +9
Anything is slow to iPad babies who are now growing up.
9
mrjane7 Apr 15, 2026 +4
I thought Pluribus was amazing. Can't wait for season 2.
4
senor_descartes Apr 15, 2026 +5
Sorry, they began slow then and are still slow to start now. It took me several tries to get thru Breaking Bad and I could never get thru S2 of Saul. It’s not revisionist, it’s just history.
5
cheapwalkcycles Apr 15, 2026 +2
Watching BCS as it came out I remember a lot of people saying it was slow. Take a breather.
2
sopheroo Apr 15, 2026 +3
Breaking Bad wasn't slow but BCS absolutely was, my brother.
3
Kitchen_Article_699 Apr 15, 2026 +7
BB pilot is a rocket launch, sure, but BCS is absolutely a slow-burn character study. “Slow” isn’t an insult by default. Maybe Pluribus just isn’t your flavor of slow.
7
Chataboutgames Apr 15, 2026 +1
The BB pilot was but it slowed down considerably afterwards. Early BB had a high ration of "Walter dealing with family shit" to "Walter melting Tuco."
1
edselisanogo Apr 15, 2026 +2
People are allowed to feel differently about the things you like. I loved both shows but the criticism some people had of it being slow is absolutely valid.
2
neo_sporin Apr 15, 2026 +2
No joke so we just finished BCS last month...At one point there was an episode where things felt like we took a minor time jump forward, but we just assumed they were trying to move things a bit faster to fit it into the season before the shows finale. Everything made enough sense that it was fine but just felt an odd decision by the show runners. After the credits rolled on the episode, i realized my wife had accidentally skipped TWO entire episodes. So the next two days we went back and realized 'huh..absolutely nothing was lost by missing those two episodes. Everything we discussed and assumed was 100% accurate' We enjoyed it, but it was slow enough that missing two episodes you didnt lose the plot
2
BramptonBatallion Apr 15, 2026 +2
Pluribus came and went. Didn’t make a cultural imprint and less people probably will watch second season. That’s just how it goes. Not everything from a particular creator is a homerun. Some are just singles and doubles.
2
latestwonder Apr 15, 2026 +1
getting real sick of people taking any opinion different from their own as being "bots" or marketing.
1
michaelbusterkeaton Apr 15, 2026 +1
I found season 1 of BCS to be incredibly slow. Purposefully and beautifully so. But I've been known to be insanely inaccurate.
1
mike10dude Apr 15, 2026 +1
I was so bored with maybe the first 3 seasons of saul Eventually I thought it became really fun show to watch though
1
Mindless-Gap-8376 Apr 15, 2026 +2
Inaccurate. I watched breaking bad from day one. It was widely viewed as "good but really really really slow" up until season 3, and then it took off, in both viewership and pacing.
2
Locke108 Apr 15, 2026 +1
BCS is slow. It moves faster than Pluribus but it is slow.
1
ViskerRatio Apr 15, 2026 +1
When we talk about a 'slow' story, what we're really talking about is the passivity of the protaganist(s). It's not so much that they're not unraveling the mythology of the show but that they're not really doing much but reacting to it. In the era of episodic broadcast TV, you didn't have 'slow burn' stories because no one would sit around and watch a show where nothing really happened week after week. So even when you had an overarching story, the protagonist(s) were still doing *something*. A good example of this would be Babylon 5. It has an epic, overarching story. However, it is told in an episodic format where each episode had a largely self-contained story where our protagonist(s) were doing something even if it only peripherally involved the epic arc. However, what we shouldn't forget is that 'slow' is a generally an example of bad storytelling. It's what happens when the author can't figure out a way to explain their world to you in an interesting way so they just essentially lore dump on you. Imagine watching Star Wars and, instead of jumping into the action, they gave you 20 minutes of scrolling text to explain the entire background of the universe. That would be an example of 'slow' - and an example of bad writing. The 'burn' part is merely an acknowledgement and defense of 'slow'. It indicates the claim that all that time you spent slogging through passive content will ultimately be worthwhile. It's a half-hearted compliment at best. Neither Breaking Bad nor Better Call Saul is a 'slow burn'. They involve active protagonist(s) from the get-go. They may not reveal everything right away but you don't need to know everything - you can just follow the action.
1
Whatiredditlike Apr 15, 2026 +1
What’s really insane is how Listnookors will go to such lengths to hate on Pluribus when it is so clearly an evolution of the writing and especially the directing of BB/BCS. I can’t help but assume the haters are all homophobic and/or just plain sexist… because Rhea Seehorn being the main character and that character being a lesbian are the only real difference from the Breaking Bad universe when it comes to the care and craft Vince Gilligan puts into his works. Like if you enjoyed BCS and you enjoyed the character of Kim Wexler, then you’re getting more of the same but even better with Pluribus.
1
BramptonBatallion Apr 15, 2026 +2
> the only difference Oh so you think it’s a copy/paste of an existing show? Doesn’t sound like a w***** then either. Congrats you just made the case for the show somehow even worse.
2
Whatiredditlike Apr 15, 2026 -2
All of storytelling is just copy/paste from one medium to another, one culture to the next, or from one language to another. Just with the natural drift and refinement across the transition by people putting their own spin on things. In Pluribus’ case it’s the best, most detailed take on a Body Snatchers that exists on Earth currently. But you sound like you’re really just itching for trolling. Have you even seen Breaking Bad?
-2
[deleted] Apr 15, 2026 +2
[removed]
2
Whatiredditlike Apr 15, 2026 -2
I read a whole book on ad hominem attacks to see what you’re doing. You do realize you’re on the /r/television sublistnook correct?
-2
BramptonBatallion Apr 15, 2026 +2
Ad hominem is what you when you said first actually. You accused people of being anti-gay and then claimed I was trolling.
2
Whatiredditlike Apr 15, 2026
Well you certainly haven’t engaged me in an earnest manner that is for sure. Let’s restart this, you even seem Pluribus? Better Call Saul? Breaking Bad? You’ve given me nothing to actually work with here so yes, I have to treat you like you’re trolling. Sorry.
0
BramptonBatallion Apr 15, 2026 +2
I engaged you sincerely. You defended show by saying it’s the exact same as creator’s other shows and then said nothing original exists which was a mind-boggling statement so I asked if you have ever read a book because I could tell your horizons are narrow.
2
Whatiredditlike Apr 15, 2026 +1
Have you ever read or at least heard of The Hero with a Thousand Faces? The work of nonfiction most commonly associated and cited by George Lucas regarding Star Wars? Because that was my ‘mind-boggling statement’, a simple point of fact.
1
BramptonBatallion Apr 15, 2026 +2
No I have not read that one. Did you?
2
Chataboutgames Apr 15, 2026 +1
> I read a whole book on ad hominem attacks to see what you’re doing. Your top level comment is calling people who disagree with you bigots, now you're bitching about ad hominem?
1
Whatiredditlike Apr 15, 2026
I’m ASSUMING a position because of low level comments like yours that aren’t actually providing any kind of counter argument on why people glaze BCS but hate on Pluribus. I’m happy to actually hear you out if you’ve got something to say but you just seem to be unwilling to have a discussion.
0
Chataboutgames Apr 15, 2026 +1
Why the f*** would *anyone* engage in some quality discussion with you when you literally *open* with "I assume that anyone who has different takes than me on TV shows is a bigot?" Why would anyone substantially engage with that? Why would *anyone* take seriously a person who opens with that and then appeals to ad hominem?
1
Whatiredditlike Apr 15, 2026
I didn’t actually say that, and you could tone down the harsh language please. I’m simply pointing out that all incessant irreverent criticism of Pluribus usually boils down to being overly pedantic towards its main character—someone who is a lesbian. If you want to try and make a case that doesn’t fall into that line of argument, by all means.
0
Chataboutgames Apr 15, 2026 +2
> I didn’t actually say that, and you could tone down the harsh language please. Lol f*** yourself. "Everyone who doesn't like my show is a bigot, could you please tone down your language?" You're genuinely disgusting.
2
Chataboutgames Apr 15, 2026 +3
> I can’t help but assume the haters are all homophobic and/or just plain sexist… because Rhea Seehorn being the main character and that character being a lesbian are the only real difference from the Breaking Bad universe when it comes to the care and craft Vince Gilligan puts into his works. God it's like you wake up in the morning and consciously choose to fry your own brain.
3
Fragllama Apr 15, 2026 +3
You apparently can’t help be a complete Listnook stereotype either, you absolute clown. Nobody’s “going to lengths”, it just doesn’t measure up. And it’s not even remotely close to “more of the same”. It’s a completely different story with one actor in common. Or are we just supposed to not think for ourselves and gleefully thumbs up any new work by a creator we previously enjoyed, without any independent thought?
3
Whatiredditlike Apr 15, 2026 +1
I’ll give it to you that you’re well articulated in your response, but you’re not really providing any kind of counter argument either. Yes, actually—people go out of their way to criticize this show while being unable to explain how it’s different from BCS. And no, actually you are just wrong—the grocery store sequence among many other scenes are in direct conversation with the kind of scene composition found in BB and BCS. The plot is different sure, it exists in a different genre. But practically speaking the show aesthetically looks like it COULD take place in the same universe as BB, which is a testament to Albuquerque’s natural beauty but mainly to how Vince produces his shows. Ironically, your attempt to suggest you’re individualistic in your opinion of the show is actually rather collectivist in practice. At least on this sublistnook.
1
LateChoice Apr 15, 2026 -1
if breaking bad is art then god help us, said critic richard brody.
-1
Just-QeRic Apr 15, 2026 +1
People have been saying Better Call Saul is slow since 2015, my guy.
1
Chaloby Apr 15, 2026
I want to agree with you but as someone who watched BB and BCS live from the get-go, I was hard pressed to get anyone in my life hooked on either show the way I was, especially in the first two seasons, because a lot of people did feel it was “slow”. You can personally disagree that it was slow (I didn’t feel it was either) but claiming it’s “revisionist” of people to be saying that is blatantly incorrect. EDIT: Looking at viewership, BB quite literally didn’t become a phenomenon until late S4. It’s not unreasonable to classify that as a “slow start” for a show.
0
Chataboutgames Apr 15, 2026 -1
BCS was absolutely slow, slow enough that I gave up on it. Not interested in Pluribus so can't tell you if it's as slow or whatever, but BCS was absolutely slow. And I'd call the first season of BB relatively slow, particularly compared to the later stuff. And you thinking this is some bot conspiracy is a mental health issue.
-1
← Back to Board