· 21 comments · Save ·
Announcements Apr 3, 2026 at 10:22 AM

The US started a war with Iran 34 days ago, killed their Supreme Leader, bombed hospitals and schools, and Trump is now threatening to bomb them "back to the stone ages" at what point does the rest of the world have the right to intervene?

Posted by Crafty-Rate4179

🚩 Report this post

21 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
Sophie_Blitz_123 Apr 3, 2026 +1
The "right" to intervene? Who is it you perceive could do something but isn't because of a lack of "right"?
1
Legitimate_Voice_608 Apr 3, 2026 +1
What are we gonna do? We are preparing for a russian invasion. And we arent ready. What are gonna do against the US?
1
OrangeZestyclose9192 Apr 3, 2026 +1
No one intervened for ukrainians in a middle of Europe, no would intervene for iran and go against Usa.
1
Jimmy_83_Don Apr 3, 2026 +1
I think Americans need to take responsibility and take him out of leadership. Not much realistically the rest of the world can do.
1
547217 Apr 3, 2026 +1
People have been saying the same thing for many leaders such as Putin for a long, long time.
1
theindieproj Apr 3, 2026 +1
Most people can and probably want to intervene. It's just the fact that the world will probably end if any other country messes with Trump's plans.
1
Mobile_Blackberry298 Apr 3, 2026 +1
No one will intervene as long as it won't affect them directly.
1
Remarkable-Fly-1730 Apr 3, 2026 +1
34 days ago
1
Grizzled_Ghost Apr 3, 2026 +1
A neutral world leader would had to somehow trick Trump into a "Jinx, owe me a truce" scenario on Iran's behalf and just hope that he respects the UN's No Takesies Backsies Accord.
1
547217 Apr 3, 2026 +1
If you were the leader of a country, why would you want to intervene, especially in any war with such a military power as the US? The question becomes what benefit does it provide? It's certainly going to provide a loss of financial resources.
1
Odd_Musician_4690 Apr 3, 2026 +1
Read about 1979, how Iran was couped by a radical terrorist group, how us embassy staff was kidnapped for negotyby Iran government...someone needed guts to face them, and no one had it in 47 years
1
Several_Mousse_9485 Apr 3, 2026 +1
Yeah we know. Still an excuse and not an explanation. Turn off Fox News.
1
sherbetty Apr 3, 2026 +1
Why should it be us? What happened to "America First"
1
ToeFinal1792 Apr 3, 2026 +1
Someone needed to and no one else was willing, clearly. This is putting America First. The regime lied about not having long range missiles that could strike Europe and proved that by launching them. What else have they lied about? The problem as I see it is so many people are against this administration that all logic fails and they end up, sometimes without even realizing it, defending the bad guys.
1
Training-Year3734 Apr 3, 2026 +1
Read a little farther back and realize why that happened and maybe dont look like a moron.
1
Sophie_Blitz_123 Apr 3, 2026 +1
And what have you achieved? No one had the stupidity to "face" (bomb them until they unleash economic warfare and then just kinda shrug) them, I think is what you mean.
1
CampingMonk Apr 3, 2026 +1
Who is going to poke the narcissist pedo hornet's nest?
1
ToeFinal1792 Apr 3, 2026 +1
The Iranian Regime has been waging global terrorism either directly or through proxies for 50 years, including the funding and training for 9/11. At what point does the rest of the world have the right to intervene?
1
547217 Apr 3, 2026 +1
Yes and everyone should consider why America haven't had another 911. It's called preventative maintenance
1
Dounce1 Apr 3, 2026 +1
Quick question, who was funding and training those guys to begin with?
1
ToeFinal1792 Apr 3, 2026 +1
So, no answer to my question? You do not believe 50 years of global terrorism is enough to put an end to it? Why not?
1
← Back to Board