· 187 comments · Save ·
For Sale Mar 29, 2026 at 7:56 PM

There is no ethical consumption of HBO’s Harry Potter series

Posted by aacool


There is no ethical consumption of HBO’s Harry Potter series
The Verge
There is no ethical consumption of HBO’s Harry Potter series
You can’t without supporting Rowling’s transphobic bigotry.

🚩 Report this post

187 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
memiraculous Mar 30, 2026 +4
Soy article. The new Harry Potter series will be a record-shattering success. Only woke soy DEIs don't like Harry Potter.
4
ClaymoresInTheCloset Mar 29, 2026 +48
Oh, are we going to try to re-run this boycott idea again?
48
SpaceAgeBadger Mar 29, 2026 +12
It worked so well for the game! Oh wait no, everyone just rolled their eyes and ignored everyone spreading their histrionic personality powered screeching.
12
mike10dude Mar 29, 2026 +16
there was this thing in vancouver a little while ago called Harry Potter A Forbidden Forest Experience that took place in a big city park the parks board meetings had tons of people showing up begging them to not allow it and all over social media I was seeing people say it would be a huge failure but apparently ended up selling out almost every night and got extended for a extra month
16
_Army9308 Mar 29, 2026 -7
The avg person has no patience for far left trans crowd these days
-7
fiercetankbattle Mar 29, 2026 +5
I don’t know if it’s that. Most people either agree with JKR or couldn’t give a shit
5
ButtEatingContest Mar 29, 2026 -5
> Oh wait no, everyone just rolled their eyes and ignored everyone spreading their histrionic personality powered screeching. "everyone"?
-5
ellisoriginal Mar 29, 2026 -28
Only because smooth brains like you don’t understand the correlation between what you consume and what is made.
-28
krazygreekguy Mar 29, 2026 +11
So you’re not using an iPhone, right? Or literally any other smartphone, console, Nike? 99% of what you own and use is likely made in China and with practically slave labor. This is why nobody cares lmao. People like you selectively choose what to cancel. We’re done with that. And we’re not letting that trash cancel culture come back lmao. Hell no
11
Massive_Weiner Mar 29, 2026 +1
The “you can’t fix everything, so don’t do anything” argument deserves to be in a greatest hits compilation at this point. You could make an argument for why smartphones are not considered “luxury” purchases in modern society (same with the internet now), but it’s not something you can do for video game consoles or other media. But it’s very good that you point those out, since those *are* sectors that need to be more heavily regulated.
1
krazygreekguy Mar 29, 2026 +1
The reality is the majority of everyone is using or indirectly supporting bad stuff to some degree. I have no issue with people highlighting this, but don’t be a hypocrite. You better be living by your standards then before you start harassing other people, which nobody should be harassing anyone in the first place. Period
1
Massive_Weiner Mar 30, 2026 +1
If it’s impossible to not indirectly contribute to bad stuff, then it’s impossible to be a hypocrite when complaining about that reality. After all, we don’t have the power to “live by our standards” in this system. All you can do is attempt to change it first. And change starts with small steps, like entertainment media. Cultivate a society that’s receptive to more progressive change.
1
krazygreekguy Mar 30, 2026 +1
No, it’s not. Not for everyone. Sure, maybe for some. Nobody’s forcing anyone to buy or use any products or services made unethically. not saying it’s easy, but it’s 100% possible. Let’s just be honest though. Most Americans don’t want what’s not easy. And that’s ok
1
ellisoriginal Mar 30, 2026
This is f****** dumb. And I can’t tell what would be worse, you posturing THAT HARD just to “win”, or if you actually believe what you just typed out for people to read.
0
krazygreekguy Mar 30, 2026 +1
I don’t care about “winning” or internet brownie points, let alone what random people on the internet think. Feel free to say whatever you want, to your heart’s content
1
ellisoriginal Mar 30, 2026 +1
I appreciate you answering my question at least.
1
Massive_Weiner Mar 30, 2026
>nobody’s forcing anyone to buy or use products That’s objectively untrue. What you’re allowed to buy is dictated by your salary, which means those who don’t make a lot have to resort to the purchasing the cheapest products available no matter how unethically they were sourced. You do not have free will under this system unless you have the money to buy whatever you want. Most don’t even have the luxury to avoid predatory landlords when it comes to housing arrangements.
0
PortoGuy18 Mar 30, 2026 +1
You can leave the system and live an isolated life from society, like some anti-tech communities do. You don't because at the end of the day, you like the perks of said society and don't want to give that away, so you come up with Pick and Choose arguments about what is socially acceptable or not, so that you can keep convicing yourself that you're not like the other people you criticize.
1
DodgerBaron Mar 29, 2026 +6
What
6
Budget_Agency_2509 Mar 29, 2026 +23
Does The Verge have a list of what we are allowed to consume ethically? I appreciate that they are able to dictate the world.
23
Seagoon_Memoirs Mar 29, 2026 +7
they know best how we should live!! s/
7
_Army9308 Mar 29, 2026 +1
Starfleet academy
1
thatshygirl06 Mar 29, 2026 +44
Pirating
44
muduke Mar 29, 2026 +9
Ah yes, the robin hood of entertainment. 
9
_Army9308 Mar 29, 2026 +1
Pirating doesnt really hurt tv shows though More people watch then get drawn in and turn in Happened to game of thrones
1
Naroyto Mar 29, 2026 -2
That just makes you hypocritical. Don't watch it if it bothers you so much that you wouldn't watch it without stipulations.
-2
Massive_Weiner Mar 29, 2026 +4
The content of the series isn’t what they have an issue with. If that were the case, then it would make sense for them to not watch it.
4
Suspicious_Key Mar 29, 2026 +1
Aye, the essence of modern slacktivism is virtue signalling without any actual effort or sacrifice.
1
thesupermikey Mar 29, 2026 -9
Why even bother?
-9
Massive_Weiner Mar 29, 2026 +21
They most likely enjoy the franchise but don’t want to materially support it.
21
krazygreekguy Mar 29, 2026 +2
Because he/she wants to and it’s his/her prerogative
2
thatshygirl06 Mar 29, 2026 -3
I like fantasy and theres hardly any fantasy shows
-3
patswayze1 Mar 29, 2026 -10
You should really check out Korean Dramas the list of fantasy shows is endless.
-10
thatshygirl06 Mar 29, 2026 +2
Yikes, I guess people on this sub dont like kdramas
2
patswayze1 Mar 29, 2026 +1
That appears so, their loss. I love Kdramas.
1
thatshygirl06 Mar 29, 2026 +1
I love kdramas, dude. They're dope asf
1
NoTitleChamp Mar 29, 2026 -17
Such a strong and ethical stance, don't want to support something but still take the time to watch. /s
-17
SonovaVondruke Mar 29, 2026 +38
There is no ethical consumption in our society. Period. Let people find joy where they can.
38
Prefer_Not_To_Say Mar 29, 2026 -4
This is always the laziest argument. You might need a pair of shoes that were made unethically. You don't need a Harry Potter TV show.
-4
SonovaVondruke Mar 29, 2026 +2
I'm tired, boss. I'm saving my anger and my energy for things I can actually do to make a change.
2
ButtEatingContest Mar 29, 2026
You have NO right co complain about ANYTHING because you purchased food to eat from a supermarket. Therefore corporations are free to do whatever they choose. /s
0
[deleted] Mar 29, 2026 -8
[deleted]
-8
longjumpingtote Mar 29, 2026 +2
It’s a discussion to have. I have ethical problems with Amazon. I no longer use Prime. But I have that luxury. While Amazon is still raising prices across most sectors (for independent stores!) they are still the best way for many families to make their money go farther. And does that mean I can’t watch anything on Amazon produces or owns? James Bond, Project Hail Mary, the documentary that uncovered more corruption at Boeing? I don’t know the answers. The world is ducked up.
2
IRequirePants Mar 29, 2026 +1
Fits nicely with the "everything is political" worldview
1
TheSpartan273 Mar 29, 2026
There are no ethical consumption of capitalism. We all have to make choices and draw lines based on our values, interests and what we think would make the most impact. Some people may consume Harry Potter content while boycotting a problematic product or service that you use - and you certainly do. I mean quick look at your profile shows you're active on r/apple and own multiple apple devices. Really man, Apple? They were firing employees for showing solidarity to Palestine during a genocide. [https://www.wired.com/story/apple-store-employees-disciplined-supporting-palestinians/](https://www.wired.com/story/apple-store-employees-disciplined-supporting-palestinians/) Do you absolutely need a mac? You said you hate windows, good, Microsoft is also highly problematic, learn Linux. edit: bro deleted and dipped.
0
ellisoriginal Mar 29, 2026 -12
Maybe people can find joy in something that doesn’t subsequently fund a billionaire’s attempts at erasing the trans community. Just a thought.
-12
namewithak Mar 29, 2026 +6
You support an NFL team, dude. You have no moral standing.
6
Sonichu- Mar 29, 2026 +1
Good luck. Nearly anything you buy puts money in the pocket of a conservative hate monger.
1
ellisoriginal Mar 29, 2026 +7
True. But it feels like this is pretty low hanging fruit right? Like, - Watching this show, encourages companies to make more of this show. - More of this show means more money for JK Rowling. - More money for JK Rowling means more money being funneled into anti-trans initiatives, groups, and messaging. So if you care about the Trans community, it feels like something as easy as not watching a TV show, is a slam dunk.
7
Sonichu- Mar 29, 2026 -1
You’re not wrong. But just based on the demographics of billionaires and their shitty opinions, you can make a reasoned argument against most things. Every post made and page loaded on Listnook puts money in Amazon’s pocket (through AWS) and makes Bezos richer. Bezos funds the election of conservative politicians who actively fight against the rights and existence of Trans people.
-1
ellisoriginal Mar 29, 2026 -2
Right, but you’re also talking about a MUCH bigger scope, and way more steps to get to the direct damage to the community. People don’t have the bandwidth for everything and giving up things like clothing, electronics, or even social media to an extent are much harder and more involved. This issue we’re talking about is immensely simpler, and has a much more direct impact.
-2
GlassjawIsGreat Mar 30, 2026 +1
Yawn
1
ellisoriginal Mar 30, 2026
So edgy! Edit: f****** dork.
0
SonovaVondruke Mar 29, 2026
She already has more money than she will ever need to fund those efforts. It's a difference that makes no difference.
0
SimplyTheGuest Mar 29, 2026 +36
Is this going to be like when everyone was virtue signaling about the Harry Potter video game, only for it to end up being incredibly successful?
36
Classic-Rise-37 Mar 29, 2026 +6
It will break records for HBO this first season is going to be massive.
6
HankSteakfist Mar 30, 2026 +2
It was literally the only non Rockstar game to outsell Call of Duty in over 13 years.
2
Sixhaunt Mar 29, 2026 +11
yeah, it always backfires
11
mikepictor Mar 29, 2026 -15
That doesn’t constitute “backfiring”.  It was successful, and despite that, some people also boycotted (and trans people in their life may have been thankful for it)
-15
Sixhaunt Mar 29, 2026 +5
They boycotted and protested to the point where a plethora of people who wouldn't have known about the game or cared much were instead bombarded with clips of it and people talking about it which drew in far more sales than had the boycott not happened or if it had been a silent decision with no pressure on others to do the same. It achieved the opposite of the stated goal by a large margin.
5
mikepictor Mar 29, 2026 -2
I doubt it. This wasn't a case of the Streisand effect. The game was already heavily publicised, and extremely well know.
-2
ButtEatingContest Mar 29, 2026 +3
>Is this going to be like when everyone was virtue signaling about the Harry Potter video game, only for it to end up being incredibly successful? What's your point? Some people avoided the game, some didn't. The show will be no different. However avoiding using a product isn't "virtue signalling" any more than your post is "virtue signalling". The consumption of Harry Potter isn't a default human action. Some people never consumed Harry Potter products likely because they were not the target audience, young children.
3
Agile_Land_9951 Mar 29, 2026 -5
It’s like when the right got butthurt about the superbowl. Then held their own halftime show. No one noticed. Turns out folks just wanted to watch the superbowl halftime entertainment.
-5
TheSpartan273 Mar 29, 2026 -5
Maybe, maybe not, but these are not really comparable. A high quality open world Harry Potter game where we could play our own student at hogwarts is something the fans have been ~~asking~~ dreaming **forever**, me included. Not a surprise it got a huge success. **Nobody** asked for a remake of Harry Potter. Most fans are very fond of the movies and original cast. Just like the Rings of Power, it could very well be considered hot garbage.
-5
JigglesTheBiggles Mar 29, 2026 +5
This isn't true. People have been asking for faithful TV show adaption for a long time. It was literally the biggest wish from the fanbase lol
5
Donnigan37 Mar 29, 2026 +26
Continue reading with a verge subscription. Nah, I'm good. Thanks for reminding me to mute this sub tho.
26
SoWrongItsPainful Mar 29, 2026 +44
There is no ethical consumption. The show will be made and will be a success regardless of what the readers of this article think. If it’s good, I’m going to watch it. That doesn’t make me or anyone else who enjoys it complicit with JK Rowlings views.
44
OneRacoonShort Mar 29, 2026 +3
But maybe we can just enjoy a show and not worry about the politics of it? I’ll watch anyways don’t ask my opinions, just count me in the audience.
3
FantasticJacket7 Mar 29, 2026 -2
>That doesn’t make me or anyone else who enjoys it complicit with JK Rowlings views. Completely disagree. This isn't like a cell phone where you essentially have to have one to exist in modern society. There are many things you have to purchase and have no reasonable more ethical options. This is an entirely optional choice you're making and it will have little to no impact on your life to simply choose not to support Rowling. By choosing to support her you are choosing to support her views.
-2
SoWrongItsPainful Mar 29, 2026 +3
You understand that it’s very likely every show produced will have someone financially gaining from it and then using those funds for bad things, right?
3
FantasticJacket7 Mar 29, 2026 -6
And if they're loud about it I will not watch that show or movie. It's not that hard to simply not watch something.
-6
Naroyto Mar 29, 2026 +3
So if you're ignorant of where the money goes for entertainment you don't virtue signal? Hypocrisy at its core.
3
FantasticJacket7 Mar 29, 2026 -2
>Hypocrisy Please explain how my inability to read people's minds makes me hypocritical.
-2
Naroyto Mar 29, 2026
Well let's start with this "fantasticjacket 7" of yorba Linda orange county California, you enjoyed watching the show The 100 from the CW. That show and network for that matter has a representation of LGBT characters needing to die in their shows. You watch the show so you must be in favor of it. The CW also cancels any shows with anything LGBT if they don't die. So how does this not make you hypocritical? But because you don't know it doesn't affect you does it? You can hide all you want but information is always available.
0
SoWrongItsPainful Mar 29, 2026 +1
Just cut out the middle man and stop watching anything, please
1
FantasticJacket7 Mar 29, 2026 -4
"And yet you live in society" ass comment. It must be a sad life to not have any conviction or values.
-4
SoWrongItsPainful Mar 29, 2026 +5
I have conviction, this is just an exceedingly stupid hill to die on
5
FantasticJacket7 Mar 29, 2026
Imagine describing not watching a show as a hill to die on. It takes zero effort from you. If it's too much for you to do literally nothing then you have zero convictions.
0
ChipsnDipnDipnChips Mar 29, 2026 +1
Folk like you are way too comfy making broad character indictments on people for the weakest shit. "You have zero convictions because you aren't refusing to watch a tv show".
1
FantasticJacket7 Mar 29, 2026
If the shoe fits.
0
Skt721 Mar 29, 2026 -4
Yes, that is a possibility, but JK Rowling IS Harry Potter. She is also incredibly outspoken about her beliefs, and will use revenue from the licensing of her property to hurt trans people. While there is no ethical consumption under capitalism, you do still have the ability as a consumer to weigh the consequences by supporting or not supporting this or that. You've made the decision to watch British kids at a boarding school shoot lasers at each other or whatever (and not even for the first time, like you can just watch the movies that already tell this story), instead of doing the bare minimum to support the trans community by not doing that. Every company has some a****** somewhere on the chain of command doing some evil shit with their money. But if I watch A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms, I can at least take solace in the fact that George RR Martin isn't using his HBO checks to demonize a marginalized group (neither are any of the lead actors, nor the show runner). If you watch this new Harry Potter show, that isn't the case.
-4
SoWrongItsPainful Mar 29, 2026 +4
Hope you don’t have an Iphone
4
speedlimits65 Mar 29, 2026 -21
jk rowling has explicitly said she uses the money she makes off the series to support anti-trans legislation. itd be different if it was a secret, but shes as upfront about that as possible, so yes if you spend money that goes to her knowing this, you are complicit with her views. you can still enjoy the series, just dont spend money on it.
-21
SoWrongItsPainful Mar 29, 2026 +1
Most of the money you spend is funneled up to billionaires who financially support the Trump administration. The only difference is that JK is loud about it.
1
speedlimits65 Mar 29, 2026 +1
yes and its harder to avoid spending money on food than it is a specific IP.
1
Nandi_La Mar 29, 2026 -32
It absolutely does make you or anyone involved in production or consumption complicit by promoting her products that she gets directly paid for. A+ for matching your username and statement though
-32
What_A_Good_Sniff Mar 29, 2026 +11
Let me ask you this: Do you support child labor and are complicit in it because you own an iPhone? Or how about the clothes that you choose to wear?
11
Chataboutgames Mar 29, 2026
Just as complicit as you are with the individual moral choices and political inclinations of every member of every production you’ve ever watched. It’s just that you don’t care unless those people’s views are selected by the algorithm. to be a combatant source of contention. It’s performative slacktivism. Feeling any ounce of guilt about the show? Donate $5 to the Zebra Youth, I assure you that will do 100x more to help trans kids than being self superior about not watching Harry Potter.
0
GameOfLife24 Mar 29, 2026 -7
So many people were involved in those movies and now this tv show. Yes she will profit from this success but so will the others who worked hard but this tv show does look c**** in comparison
-7
SoWrongItsPainful Mar 29, 2026 +4
The show looks completely fine so far, and it’ll obviously look cheaper compared to the movies, it’s a tv show where a single season will be about as long as all half of the movies combined.
4
Skt721 Mar 29, 2026 -11
How does it not make you complicit?  It doesn’t mean you agree, but you’re definitely complicit. You’re willing to put your own entertainment above the well being of a marginalized community. Like congrats on not caring I guess, but that is what you’re doing. 
-11
ellisoriginal Mar 29, 2026 -16
Yes it does, sit the f*** down
-16
MemeMaster240 Mar 29, 2026 +5
Care to give examples?
5
ellisoriginal Mar 29, 2026 +2
You want me to explain capitalism? Listen, if no one wanted to watch a show that funds a billionaire and her goal of erasing trans people, then they wouldn’t make it. So using “welp, nothing we can do. Everything sucks already” as a scapegoat to enjoy a show, is pretty weak. You don’t have to stand on business with everything, because yeah, we sort of are already fucked. But don’t use that type of bullshit to excuse away your choices.
2
MemeMaster240 Mar 29, 2026 +1
I misread you said it makes you complicit, then where do you draw the line? Because at some point your money has went somewhere you morally oppose. Claiming that having a subscription to hbo makes you complicit in the erasure of trans people is quite a stretch. Vilifying an entire audience is a surefire way of getting the opposite reaction, need i bring up hogwarts legacy?
1
ellisoriginal Mar 29, 2026
I responded somewhere else, but start f****** anywhere with something that matters to you. And for a lot of people, this topic is important and matters. You wanna boycott Nike and encourage others to join? F*** yeah. You wanna stick it to Monsanto and only eat heirloom vegetables? Right on! We don’t have the bandwidth for everything, but at minimum we can refrain from shitting on ideas and the people trying to change something that matters to them.
0
MemeMaster240 Mar 29, 2026 +2
There is nothing wrong with fighting back against dangerous people and their stupid ideas, but what im against is, is telling people you're complicit in the deaths of certain minority groups, or being called a literal nazi for wanting to watch one thing, it doesnt help anybody.
2
ellisoriginal Mar 29, 2026
It just means you don’t care about the people it harms enough. I’m sorry but that’s the reality.
0
[deleted] Mar 29, 2026 +1
[deleted]
1
ButtEatingContest Mar 29, 2026 -6
> That doesn’t make me or anyone else who enjoys it complicit with JK Rowlings views. If you add to the viewer numbers on HBO - or even have a continued subscription to HBO, then you are directly contributing financially to Rowling's ant-Trans campaigns - however small. That's just a fact. It is a large contribution? no, it may be near statistically insignificant. If you watch it via some other means that does not contribute to the show's ratings or financially to HBO, then you aren't making any financial contribution to anti-trans causes via the show. Realistically, statistically if you as a single individual do or do not watch the show on HBO, it makes no real difference. And yes, the show will be a big success because some people are like lemmings for any popular IP. It would only make a difference if a large part of HBO's paying customers avoided the show. Which realistically is unlikely, because for whatever reason the whole Harry Potter franchise grips a lot of Millennials. So mostly the reason to avoid the product is for your own personal reasons. In my case I have zero interest in Harry Potter so I wouldn't be watching anyway. I can't say I'm really being inconvenienced by not watching a live action adaptation of children's books for grade school reading level.
-6
SoWrongItsPainful Mar 29, 2026 +3
Most insufferable comment I’ve read all day.
3
ButtEatingContest Mar 29, 2026 -2
It ain't much, but it's honest work
-2
krazygreekguy Mar 29, 2026 +19
Oh ffs lmao. Nobody cares. People can do whatever they want. And can support whatever they want.
19
SnooCauliflowers9533 Mar 30, 2026 -1
This article being an expression of "support whatever they want". The irony is palpable and so is your low emotional threshold for otherwise benign media content, well done lol.
-1
sombrefulgurant Mar 30, 2026
Many, many people care.
0
WorriedHelicopter764 Mar 29, 2026 +10
grow up
10
Dopamaxxer Mar 29, 2026 +12
You’re not going to shame people out of watching it.
12
JigglesTheBiggles Mar 29, 2026 +5
I'm going to watch it even harder now.
5
Any-Calligrapher2866 Mar 29, 2026
Yeah the show is already looking woke and political. No need to add more politics to the franchise.
0
Sixhaunt Mar 29, 2026 +14
There is no ethical consumption of theverge articles
14
Any-Calligrapher2866 Mar 29, 2026
Ever heard of the internet archive?
0
ODeasOfYore Mar 30, 2026 +2
Omg I’m so over this bullshit. I’ll watch what I f****** damn well please!
2
Old_Shoe3389 Mar 30, 2026 +2
I didn’t plan on watching until am the commotion. I’ll watch now just to support Rowling’s common sense
2
boomosaur Mar 29, 2026 +5
I hope these deluded woke moralists don't use any smart phones or any product made with exploitative labor practices in general.
5
IRequirePants Mar 29, 2026 +4
There is no ethical consumption of anything. We should all live in a yurt in the middle of Montana
4
Maleficent-Taste2675 Mar 29, 2026 +3
That would get crowded and ruin the (local) environment and probably kill millions of important species. 😜
3
GlassjawIsGreat Mar 30, 2026 +1
Probs on stolen land though bro. CHECK MATE
1
deadpoolfool400 Mar 29, 2026 +11
Just enjoy it if that’s your thing and also don’t be a shitty human. There you go.
11
ellisoriginal Mar 29, 2026 +4
So why care about anything right???
4
deadpoolfool400 Mar 29, 2026 +4
Sure care about it, whatever floats your boat. But if someone else wants to just enjoy the movie, show, video game, etc try not to be a d*** about it.
4
ellisoriginal Mar 29, 2026 +2
Im not encouraging shaming people who enjoy it. But I will encourage calling people out on their bullshit when they wave this, or any issue involving human rights, away just because they like a thing.
2
ras344 Mar 29, 2026 +2
Correct
2
ellisoriginal Mar 30, 2026 +1
Dope, at least you own being a b****?
1
meday20 Mar 29, 2026 +11
Ok. 
11
ElectricPeterTork Mar 29, 2026 +7
K
7
Seagoon_Memoirs Mar 29, 2026 +4
is it ethical to do anything when the mere act of living contributes to slavery in China and Global Climate Change
4
slipslikefreudian Mar 29, 2026 +6
It looks the exact same as the movie with worse lighting I don’t get it
6
Johnny0230 Mar 29, 2026 +11
maybe because it's an adaptation of the same book? The first film is very faithful, except for a few details. It was inevitable that it would appear superficially similar.
11
corporal_sweetie Mar 29, 2026 -1
does treating people like they’re stupid work in your real social life as well as it works online
-1
southernfirefly13 Mar 29, 2026 +1
To complain that a newer adaptation of a book looks the same to a previous adaptation is actually pretty stupid, especially based off a microscopic fraction of clips as compared to the adaptation itself, is pretty stupid, though.
1
corporal_sweetie Mar 29, 2026 -3
Is it?
-3
Johnny0230 Mar 29, 2026 +1
I'm not offending anyone, I would never allow myself to do so, it's just an ironic statement.
1
IRequirePants Mar 29, 2026
I think the later seasons will be more interesting, if this is successful. The later movies had to adapt longer books and so had to cut more (I think, I only saw the first two movies).
0
Johnny0230 Mar 29, 2026 +2
Yes, from the third season onwards there will be many more dynamics (the third is a great film but not a good adaptation). Perhaps this is why, in my opinion, they added so many scenes not present in the book, as you can see in the trailer, and all the dynamics of Harry in the real world that were eliminated in the film.
2
IRequirePants Mar 29, 2026 +1
With the shorter books maybe they can add some world-building stuff as well, but then you might end up with a Hobbit situation with nonsensical subplots and too many liberties taken.
1
GameOfLife24 Mar 29, 2026 -4
At this moment they’ve shown mostly new scenes but it does look like a parody compared to the movies. Where is the money going
-4
ponderousponderosas Mar 29, 2026 +3
Nah I’m cool with it.
3
Chickenshit_outfit Mar 29, 2026 +2
This show going to do epic numbers just like the video game. YouTube reviewers who lean very left are already making excuses why they are still going to watch and review it to try not piss off the trans community
2
MailboxSlayer14 Mar 29, 2026 +3
If you don’t wanna watch it have fun but a majority of the population don’t care and want to watch Harry Potter. The boycott with Legacy failed spectacularly
3
Blacknite45 Mar 29, 2026 +3
I see someone is promoting it lol Tbf tho this is becoming insufferable and repetitive. It's completely fine to not watch the series. Being this performative is just cringe 
3
ButtEatingContest Mar 29, 2026
> Being this performative is just cringe "Performative" seems to have lost all meaning, like "virtue signalling" since it's become basically automatic for some to dismiss anyone's opinion or actions as such.
0
Johnny0230 Mar 29, 2026 +4
Has it become so difficult to separate the work from the artist? It seems sad to me, however, to so mislead those who actually want to watch the series because they're interested in Harry Potter and that's it.
4
Any-Calligrapher2866 Mar 29, 2026
Yeah considering Rowling makes money to bribe her way to make anti Trans legislation?
0
previouslyonimgur Mar 29, 2026 -15
When the artist screams “support this is support for my cause” It’s very difficult
-15
Johnny0230 Mar 29, 2026 +3
Seguendo questo ragionamento, dovremmo andare in un supermercato con una conoscenza impeccabile di ogni marchio e delle loro convinzioni/opinioni (e questo è solo un esempio, perché si applicherebbe a tutto). Questo è insostenibile, e non guardare la serie (che alla fine è una scelta personale, non è un grande problema) non cambia nulla. Tuttavia, mi sembra triste ingannare così tanto chi vuole davvero guardare la serie perché è interessato a Harry Potter e basta.
3
previouslyonimgur Mar 29, 2026
How am I misleading anyone. You asked “has it become difficult to separate an artist from their cause” I said, in this case, the artist is screaming “there is no separation between my art and my cause” That it is difficult. I didn’t advocate to not watch it. I didn’t advocate to watch it. Jfc you want to watch it, watch it. I didn’t even watch the movies so I really don’t give a shit. But just to point out your little grocery store point. Jewish people (as individuals) have and (some) continue to boycott Volkswagen since the 1950s for their “political opinions”. Just because you don’t recognize that people have been doing this shit for the past 70+ years doesn’t mean it hasn’t/isn’t happening. The internet makes it easier to know about a company/artists shit opinion, but people have crushed companies for this type of stuff for generations.
0
Johnny0230 Mar 29, 2026 +2
My point is general, not just about what you wrote. The author may have said there's no distinction (I honestly haven't read the statement), but that doesn't work that way in general, in my opinion. There's always a distinction, but this is an extremely subjective assessment.
2
mikepictor Mar 29, 2026 -2
It does change things.  Even something as simple as a trans person in your orbit somewhere sees you as slightly more safe. 
-2
mikepictor Mar 29, 2026 -4
Difficult implies I even have a desire to separate them. There so many other worthy properties I can spend my time on. 
-4
Jon-El_Snowman Mar 29, 2026 +1
I will already watch this show, you dont have to convince me more.
1
SlowmoSauce Mar 29, 2026 +3
Lol. Eat my ass, Charles Pulliam-Moore.
3
RudePragmatist Mar 29, 2026 +2
The Verge can go and suck a big felotas.
2
Bixby808 Mar 29, 2026 +1
Aside from the obvious—watching this show lines the pockets of J.K. Rowling and Larry Ellison—watching it contributes to the paralysis of culture, where nothing new ever has to be created, confronted, or interpreted, and we can rest comfortably within the confines of the familiar.
1
SurfNTurf1983 Mar 29, 2026 -1
People will pirate the shit out of this show. 
-1
Boudica4553 Mar 29, 2026 +1
What is the point in this? The theory Rowlings extreme bigotry will put people off harry potter was put to the test with hogwarts legacy and it was one of the most successful games of all time. The absolute worst case for this show is that it merely ties with game of thrones as the most popular show in HBOs history
1
Total_Pin_214 Mar 29, 2026 +1
what do you man exackly when you say there is no "ethical" way to watch the new harry potter?
1
GlassjawIsGreat Mar 30, 2026 +1
Bla bla bla.
1
IamPieBoy94 Mar 29, 2026 -8
There is, im paying to watch it
-8
OneGeekyBelgian Mar 29, 2026 +2
My favorite part is that the boycotters see no problem with funding this show through their subscription.
2
-KFBR392 Mar 29, 2026 +7
HBO tracks how many are watching individual shows, it’s not like they’re going to just count a subscription as dollars that should directly go to HP. Unless you mean to say that people should not spend any money on any company that has anything to do with HP. Which is pretty unrealistic, you’d be hard pressed to spend any money if you did that for all companies that had anything to do with any bigoted or immoral people.
7
OneGeekyBelgian Mar 30, 2026 +1
It's definitely a complicated situation, in regards to viewership v. subscription. Because like you said, you're going to be hard pressed to spend any money without some (if not all) of it going into the hands of bigoted or immoral people. Which is sort of my point, really. You can go "There's no ethical consumption of \[insert company produced product here\]" for basically 99% of everything out there... I'd rather support the hardworking & passionate actors / crew / creatives behind this show. And also work against / discredit Rowling and her horrendous views in the meanwhile.
1
ButtEatingContest Mar 29, 2026 +2
> My favorite part is that the boycotters see no problem with funding this show through their subscription. That's an illogical assumption on your part. Of course continuing to give money to HBO is what is funding the show. But the idea that "boycotters" (as if they were some organized club) are either subscribed to or haven't cancelled their HBO subscription is just your wild guess.
2
OneGeekyBelgian Mar 30, 2026 +1
Which makes it rather interesting to me that I haven't seen anyone mention cancelling it yet. All the talk I ever see is about not watching the show.
1
batsofburden Mar 29, 2026 +1
What about Amazon shows? They support Jeff Bezos who in turn supports the MAGA agenda. Somehow those shows get a pass from the moral purity brigaders?
1
Dianagorgon Mar 29, 2026 +1
How does watching the show help JKR? I assume she was already paid for the rights to the IP. If the show doesn't do well it doesn't change how much money they paid her. If the show does well it also doesn't change how much money they paid her. They already paid her for the IP. Maybe young children who haven't read the books might decide to buy the books after watching the show but that would be the only way the show being popular is going to help her. So I don't understand how people watching the show helps JKR. She is already a billionaire and HBO already paid her for the rights to the IP. Even if the show is a failure she was already paid for the rights to the IP. Also I'm going to be attacked and called a transphobe but I do think people on Listnook have an unrealistic expectation for how much people outside of their own social circle care about what JKR said or even know about it.
1
Drapausa Mar 29, 2026 +1
Paywalled link...
1
SasquatchInCrocs Mar 29, 2026 +1
Not for me!? I don't have a sub.
1
Drapausa Mar 29, 2026 +1
Have you scrolled a bit down?
1
SasquatchInCrocs Mar 29, 2026 +1
Yes, with both my iPhone and iPad. All the way to the bottom to the end of the article.
1
bigolfishey Mar 29, 2026 +1
While I personally agree with the premise of the article, on a practical level any amount of actual boycotting over this specific issue (Rowling’s transphobia) is, bluntly, a drop in a very large bucket representing the total potential viewership. The consumer population at large really just doesn’t care. People still blast Aerosmith even though Steven Tyler blatantly committed child trafficking back in the day. Mel Gibson has had a successful comeback even after a very public antisemitic rant. Neil Gaiman is a sexual predator, but that’s not going to stop adaptations of his works. If the art is good enough (or at least popular enough) it ultimately barely matters what the artist has done. On individual levels, sure, and that’s technically some amount of lost income… but barely enough to qualify as a rounding error.
1
AltonIllinois Mar 30, 2026 +1
I’m going to watch but also donate to a trans charity to help with my guilt
1
FlaviusVespasian Mar 30, 2026 +1
Im soooo bored of Harry Potter. Are kids driving this consumption machine or adults? If the former, let this continue. If the latter, y’all need to grow up and find new shit to watch.
1
Thebaldsasquatch Mar 29, 2026
I just don’t care about it because it looks like it has had all the fun, whimsy and color wrung out of it in order to be HBO-ified, gray-scaled c***. I’ll keep my Potter Christmas movies, thanks. Btw, you can tell the people that are factually correct in this one by the fact they’re downvoted. It’s like an r/conservative post at this point. Bunch of whiney babies want their new Harry Potter and f*** whatever message it sends to networks or who it further enriches.
0
SurfNTurf1983 Mar 29, 2026 +2
The books were darker though.
2
nova_crystallis Mar 29, 2026
The first one certainly wasn't.
0
bravetailor Mar 29, 2026
Ethical or not, many have already read the books and seen the original movies. For people of a certain age, they probably don't even need to see yet another version anyway.
0
jez124 Mar 29, 2026 -2
She is a terrible person so i definitely get the argument. Vile,vile woman. Probably not gonna watch it either way.
-2
Pkittens Mar 29, 2026 -10
Just admit you hate black Snape
-10
Blacknite45 Mar 29, 2026 +1
He looks fine to be honest but they should make him a inch taller and make his hair look less stylized 
1
Pkittens Mar 29, 2026 +1
tell that to the writer on the verge!
1
Hetotope Mar 29, 2026 -4
Once the Paramount purchase goes through, then there won't be ethical consumption of any HBO products because of certain murderers owning a large share.
-4
Nandi_La Mar 29, 2026 -15
It's easier to say "I'm indifferent to the plight of trans people" than to explain why you want to watch this
-15
SlowmoSauce Mar 29, 2026 +9
Lol keep crying on Listnook. Nobody cares in the real world.
9
krazygreekguy Mar 29, 2026 +4
Nobody has to explain anything. It’s their business and their decision. Period
4
moderatenerd Mar 29, 2026 -1
Just about every popular franchise has ties to right wing billionaires whether on the producer side, creative side director side or all of them. I think HP is one of the few franchises that separates the message of the franchise vs the hate from the creator really well. I could be wrong and the series may be laced with an anti-trans agenda, but I don't see how considering Rowling has said it is even more true to the books than the movies.
-1
ContinuumGuy Mar 29, 2026
> Rowling implicitly misgendered 2024 boxing gold medalist Imane Khelif. The post was the latest instance of Rowling using transphobic dog whistles to attack Khelif, which is what led the athlete to file a criminal complaint against Rowling last summer. Whatever happened to that lawsuit, anyway? I remember it being filed but nothing after that. I presume it's either been stuck in bureaucratic red tape or on hold due to the fact I imagine it's difficult for French authorities to "serve" someone outside of the country (does French law have that bit with serving papers?)
0
Energyturtle5 Mar 30, 2026 -1
Comments are very disappointing. Reading comprehension is at an all time low. Why are people bringing up the success of Hogwarts Legacy when it's completely irrelevant to the point of the article?
-1
← Back to Board