· 140 comments · Save ·
General Mar 25, 2026 at 2:02 PM

'There's no safety anymore': Palestinians warn of expanding settler violence in West Bank

Posted by Its_pipo


https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c747x00m83vo

🚩 Report this post

140 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
Hrofna Mar 26, 2026 +53
Stop calling them "settlers," and call them what they are: violent murderous terrorists.
53
vorpalWhatever Mar 26, 2026 +3
It's the same thing.
3
I_Am_Become_Dream Mar 26, 2026 +7
call them what they are: unofficial soldiers of Israel. It is not “settlers” doing this, it is the state of Israel.
7
ghotier Mar 26, 2026 +6
"Unofficial soldiers" and "state sponsored terrorist," hard to identify the difference.
6
Competitive_Cod_9853 Mar 26, 2026
They can't be - they're European, American, Australian.....
0
Th1rte3n1334 Mar 25, 2026 +417
73,000 people killed since 2023. Estimates are that at least 80% of those were civilians. 😑 Why is anyone okay with this level of violence?
417
Zippydip2 Mar 25, 2026 +62
And that number is probably a rough guess, as Israel is bombing the hospitals and killing the reporters. You know, the people that could report real numbers on the deaths and casualties.
62
WinterSector8317 Mar 25, 2026 +36
The number is only deaths the Gaza heath ministry could verify, so all the people missing and dead either in the rubble or isreali death camps aren’t counted yet
36
DrewDown94 Mar 25, 2026 +67
The number is vastly under estimated. Not to mention, this is just deaths. This doesn't consider amputees, lung damage from dust, or the effect of malnourishment on children's brain development. Let alone the psychology of survivors of this genocide.
67
I_Am_Become_Dream Mar 26, 2026 +2
the best guess I can make is looking at the PA census in 2025. They reported that the Gazan population decreased by 250k, and that 100k Gazans have left the strip through Rafah. So that leaves 150k dead at least, not counting infants who were born after the war.
2
datCASgoBRR Mar 25, 2026 +228
Because they're okay with the genocide. They don't think that Palestinians are human.
228
Malaix Mar 25, 2026 +136
Reminds me of the early 2000s after 9/11 when Americans were demanding we "glass" the middle east. AKA just indiscriminately nuke hundreds of millions of people. Or that survey where people where asked what we should do about Agrabah, the fictional city from Aladdin, and Americans were just like "Bomb it to dust" because it sounded foreign. Like I know its hard to swallow but millions, probably billions of humans on this planet are just reactive mindless violently stupid morons who would plunge us into a nuclear holocaust if they were given the codes and a tiktok video egging them on. Having the empathy, reason, and intelligence to not do that as a reflexive action is the rarity. Not the other way around.
136
datCASgoBRR Mar 25, 2026 +72
The crazy thing to me is watching people retroactively try to downplay how bloodthirsty America was in the aftermath of 9/11. Because I remember clearly the discussions happening where the question wasn't if we were going to go to war and bomb Afghanistan flat, the only question was weather or not we'd do it with conventional or nuclear bombs.
72
Malaix Mar 25, 2026 +69
Oh yeah. That whole era got sanewashed. Like today people act like the racism during the Trump era is insane and I'm like... Don't you remember in 08 when Obama won and people where building effigies of him, lynching them, and setting them on fire?
69
ArchmageXin Mar 25, 2026 +10
The weirdest one was "flip flop" There was an obsession over flip-flopping, as if people can't change their mind after additional facts become available. "Wait, you mean the car we are driving don't have breaks? Let's let go the gas and let the car come to a stop" "Shut up you gutless flip-flopper, you agreed to this drag race and we are seeing this to the end!!!" -American Bushian politics at a nutshell.
10
TheSouthernCommunist Mar 25, 2026 +27
Americans have a **REALLY** hard time shedding their sense of exceptionalism.
27
Raioto Mar 25, 2026 +1
Americans aren't unique in this lol, that is literally every oppressive country around the globe.
1
GullibleDrop2490 Mar 25, 2026 +5
Exactly. You’re right, but in America, we think we’re better than everyone else. A majority of people don’t pay attention to politics and genuinely believe we invade every place we invade to spread democracy.
5
Raioto Mar 26, 2026 +2
Do you think other countries don't think they're better than everyone else as well? Do you think other countries don't rationalize invasion to their general populace with lies?
2
GullibleDrop2490 Mar 26, 2026 +4
Some others? Yes. The vast majority of the world does not do this.
4
Th1rte3n1334 Mar 25, 2026 +10
I think the racism of the Trump administration is considered insane because of the time we’re living in. It’s 18 years after Obama took office and I think a lot of people are under the impression that racists were a dying breed here in the U.S. despite all evidence to the contrary.
10
A_Nonny_Muse Mar 25, 2026 +18
I personally received multiple credible death threats from my fellow Americans. Why? I simply called for independent confirmation of the intel everyone was hearing. You know, the propaganda that all went through D. Cheney's desk and straight to everyone from Congress and the President on down through the media to every American on the planet. We never did get any independent confirmation. It all turned out to be wrong. No nukes, no chemical weapons, no biological weapons. They were showing us morning dew on aluminum and mold under the sink of some desert rat. Today, you can't get anyone to admit they were wrong about everything. But back then, it was 99.9% of the f****** American population.
18
datCASgoBRR Mar 26, 2026 +2
F*** I remember getting into fights in high school, telling people that it would be another f****** Vietnam and they refused to hear it.
2
Niceromancer Mar 26, 2026 +3
It was insane, had friends screaming kill all rag heads. Hell i fell into that bloodthirst for a while, and im not proud of that time in my life at all.
3
datCASgoBRR Mar 26, 2026 +1
Funny thing was that if Bush has kept his war boner in his pants and limited himself to Afghanistan, I'd have probably tried for the Air Force Academy coming out of High School, but I could at least recognize Iraq as unjust insanity, and so I avoided anything to do with the military.
1
GoarSpewerofSecrets Mar 25, 2026 +1
An attack on civilians out of the blue kinda does that.  Which is why it's maddening that Trump and Netanyahu did the same thing in Iran. 
1
A_Nonny_Muse Mar 25, 2026 +11
Even today, the maga morons get pissed off whenever they hear that we're teaching our kids Arabic numerals. Some still get pissed off whenever they hear about Obamacare, even though they support the American Care Act. And "Keep your filthy Govt. out of my medicare" is still something they believe in. Nobody outside maga has ever said they were smart, or clever... or even informed.
11
Caius01 Mar 25, 2026 +3
I've come to the conclusion that people can generally be divided up into thirds - a third of people are generally open minded, a third of people are generally closed minded, and a third of people are in the middle.
3
FatJesus9 Mar 25, 2026 +5
The only lesson they took from the tragedy of the Holocaust was next time, they're going to be the ones running the camps.
5
cheesebabychair Mar 25, 2026 -14
Well after 17 years of bombs second intifada, countless suicide bombs, Oct 7, how do you expect them to feel, honestly
-14
Muffinmaker457 Mar 25, 2026 +15
Why are they getting bombed? Whose land do they occupy? If I moved into your house because, according to me, my ancestors used to own it in some dubious past then make a motion for the city council to grant me over half of it (better half at that), would you not retaliate? The Nakba alone was a worse crime than everything the Palestinian resistance did, combined. Israelis love to talk about UN resolutions which granted them land. They ignore everything else though
15
cheesebabychair Mar 25, 2026 -11
People always bring up that point without mentioning the majority of Jews in israel are there from ethnic cleansing from the middle east and north Africa. It's a wash. 750k Arabs out from ethnic cleansing, 900k Jews in from ethnic cleansing. Arab nations should absorb them like Israel absorbed the Jews. Sure, they can keep fighting, yet that has only made it worse for them. Look at f****** Gaza. Keep fighting? Are you nuts?
-11
Gurlllllllll- Mar 25, 2026 +11
Zionist fascists are actually impossible to talk to, jesus christ
11
cheesebabychair Mar 25, 2026 +1
Because we remind you of points you don't want to hear. Israel pulled settlers out of Gaza and gave it back, only to be bombed for 17 years. Why would Israel pull out of the West bank, obviously they will be bombed. Palestinians blew it, I don't know what to tell you. Oct 7 is yet another nail in the coffin. If Palestine was full fledged independent state, what is the first thing they would do?
1
Mutant-Cat Mar 26, 2026 +9
Israel never "gave Gaza back". They withdrew troops but maintained tight control of all of its borders, its imports/exports, its access to food, water and energy, and it continued to harass and kill Palestinians.
9
cheesebabychair Mar 26, 2026 +2
They pulled out the settlers, the military, the government. It was an olive branch of peace, and if Gaza was chill, restrictions would have eased, trust would have been built. Progress made to peace. Instead they elect Hamas. Egypt and Israel tightened the blockade after Hamas was elected. Have you read Hamas charter? It's simply destroy Israel, Allah willing. Why did Egypt blockade them? Go read about the Muslim brotherhood in Egypt. If there is no blockade, what do you seriously think happens. Hamas spends all their money on weapons. Why would Israel let that happen. Even with the blockade, Hamas spent their billions of aid on weapons. On tunnels. This is yet again, another in a long list of f*** ups the Palestinians made. I don't blame them for wanting to fight. But unfortunately every time they do, they end up in a worse position than before. Go look at the history and refute that.
2
Gurlllllllll- Mar 26, 2026 +1
> Palestinians blew it, I don't know what to tell you. Oct 7 is yet another nail in the coffin. The most obvious blood libel I've ever seen from a Zionist.
1
cheesebabychair Mar 26, 2026 +1
That's not what blood libel is
1
Ala117 Mar 25, 2026 +12
"nothing justifies 17 years of bombs second intifada, countless suicide bombs, Oct 7 but 17 years of bombs second intifada, countless suicide bombs, Oct 7 justifies everything"
12
cheesebabychair Mar 25, 2026 -9
Remember, this is all after Arafat turned down a state. Palestinians had a state in their hands, turned it down, and chose to continue terrorism. That was it. They blew it. There is no more left wing in Israel.
-9
Mutant-Cat Mar 26, 2026 +9
That deal was not a deal for actual statehood. It had massive concessions which would have made them a state in name only. That was why they turned it down.
9
cheesebabychair Mar 26, 2026 -2
No, Arafat turned it down because he was hoping for a better deal, and he didn't want to get assassinated. Instead he turned it down, and the state of Palestine is farther out of reach than ever before. Gaza is in ruins. 200k more settlers are in the West bank and growing. It wasn't a perfect deal for Palestinians. In hindsight, absolutely foolish not to take it.
-2
datCASgoBRR Mar 26, 2026
I dunno, how bout you ask all the people whose land has been stolen for 70 years straight? And then every-time they try and defend themselves against Israeli aggression, they Israelis kill or displace all the civilians.
0
cheesebabychair Mar 26, 2026 +1
Here is a list of peace offers which would grant the Palestinians a country of their own, they refused all of them Can’t make peace with someone who’s identity revolves around killing you 1937 - Peel commission, rejected 1947 - Partition resolution, rejected 2000 - Camp David, rejected 2001 - Taba, rejected. Arafat starts the second intifada and a year later changes his mind. 2008 - Olmert offer, rejected Here’s a video (in the article) where the chief palestinian negotiator explains what was offered in 2008. Hamas have tried to agree to boundaries Despite media attempts to portray it as a new Hamas charter, it is not. The new ‘policy document’ accepts the creation of a Palestinian state in 1967 borders, but still rejects Israel and claims its territory. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-39775103 1919: Arabs of Palestine refused nominate representatives to the Paris Peace Conference. 1920: San Remo conference decisions, rejected. 1922: League of Nations decisions, rejected. 1937: Peel Commission partition proposal, rejected. 1938: Woodhead partition proposal, rejected 1947: UN General Assembly partition proposal (UNGAR 181), rejected. 1949: Israel’s outstretched hand for peace (UNGAR 194), rejected. 1967: Israel’s outstretched hand for peace (UNSCR 242), rejected. 1978: Begin/Sa’adat peace proposal, rejected (except for Egypt). 1994: Rabin/Hussein peace agreement, rejected by the rest of the Arab League (except for Egypt). 1995: Rabin’s Contour-for-Peace, rejected. 2000: Barak/Clinton peace offer, rejected. 2001: Barak’s offer at Taba, rejected. 2005: Sharon’s peace gesture, withdrawal from Gaza, rejected. 2008: Olmert/Bush peace offer, rejected. 2009 to 2021: Netanyahu’s repeated invitations to peace talks, rejected. 2014: Kerry’s Contour-for-Peace, rejected. Not gonna link Trump’s imbecilic peace plan as an example. Here is a list of peace offers the Palestinians offered to Israel - None.
1
RobCoxxy Mar 26, 2026 +11
The fact the IDF finally accepts the 73,000 figure from, what, February 2024 (that was "Hamas propaganda" at the time), and before all hospitals were destroyed along with any possibility of keeping an accurate figure for the death toll is a *giant* indicator it's way, *way* worse.
11
mrdominoe Mar 25, 2026 +42
Because to speak out against it is antisemitic, apparently.
42
funglegunk Mar 25, 2026 +19
Watch an interview with the average Israeli on the street. It is f****** *bone-chilling* how casually genocidal they are.
19
FuckTripleH Mar 26, 2026 +3
73,000 is the number of those killed directly by Israeli fire, it doesn't include those killed by famine, or crushed under rubble, or by disease. The total dead is in the hundreds of thousands.
3
sirsoggyfella Mar 25, 2026 +1
At LEAST 73k, and rising. Who knows how many countless bodies are trapped under rubble that are not part of the official toll.
1
Immediate_Amoeba5923 Mar 26, 2026 -6
Why don't you all care about the 30,000+ Iranians slaughtered by the Islamic regime in Iran in under a week?
-6
NimbleAlbatross Mar 26, 2026 +2
Can you show me where you got that stat from?
2
Niceromancer Mar 26, 2026 +1
Because to the new axis of evil those aren't people, just inconvenient natives.
1
Otherwise_Lychee_33 Mar 26, 2026 +1
is this only in the west bank or you are saying Gaza + West Bank?
1
verdant_red Mar 26, 2026 +1
u/hatredpants2 is ok with it
1
bb5e8307 Mar 25, 2026 -9
There is no estimate that places 80% as civilian. There was a study that 20% were **named** verified Hamas militants. The study places an absolute lowest bar possible, and was not making an estimate.. The study points out that there are many unnamed verified militants. For example Yahya Sinwar was a verified named militant that was killed. He was with two armed body guards and one was absolutely a Hamas member, but the IDF could not identify him.
-9
Th1rte3n1334 Mar 25, 2026 +5
I mean according to the Wikipedia there are estimates that place civilian casualties at or above the 75% mark. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Gaza_war If you have something that says otherwise it would be nice if you provided it. 😊
5
bb5e8307 Mar 25, 2026 -3
I think you should read the article again. There are a lot of number in the article - most of them are "estimates". The study which showed 20% were VERIFIED NAMED HAMAS members sets an absolute lowest possible bar of where the number can be. So the estimates that place it as 90% are not only wrong, they cast a large amount of doubt on the "estimates" that were made by organization with obviously flawed methodology.
-3
Alocasia_Sanderiana Mar 26, 2026 +5
If you can't verify if someone was a combatant then you have to count them as a non-combatant. You're really trying to pull the 'military-aged males' bullshit from the War on Terror?
5
Immediate_Amoeba5923 Mar 26, 2026 -5
Your anti semitic information sources misled you. "Based on reports from United Nations agencies, including OCHA and UNRWA, and human rights organizations, more than 1,000 Palestinians have been killed in the West Bank (including East Jerusalem) by Israeli forces and settlers since October 7, 2023."
-5
TinyFugue Mar 25, 2026 -11
What happened in 2023?
-11
DrewDown94 Mar 25, 2026 +14
That was actually the beginning of all history.
14
A_Nonny_Muse Mar 25, 2026 +215
All according to plan.
215
Jrecondite Mar 25, 2026 +77
> There’s no safety anymore.  There never was. They just hadn’t gotten to you yet. Look at history.
77
Jeanclaudegahdam Mar 25, 2026 +126
Call me anti-semitic but the clowns here defending Israel while they literally just annexed southern Lebanon can all suck a big fat c***. That useless welfare apartheid state is only held up by the corrupt politicians they paid off in the US. Once we vote them out, I hope they get whats coming for them.
126
PuzzleheadedWhile9 Mar 25, 2026 +14
*they pedophile blackmailed around the planet
14
Commercial-Lack6279 Mar 26, 2026 -25
Lebanon declared Iran’s ambassador persona non grata. That means they expelled him. Lebanon is not happy with having an Iranian backed militia stronger than its own military controlling the territory. Israel has occupied Lebanon every time militants used the territory to attack, Israel has always withdrawn, only for the militants to come back and fire at Israel. So why would this time be an annexation when no country is saying it is? Israel isn’t useless. To claim otherwise would be to claim the US and europe support it out of the kindness of their hearts which is naive. I mean you can call it an apartheid state if you like BUT 1 in 5 Israelis are Arabs and represent 10% in Israeli parliament As for welfare, while it’s true that the US spends around 3.8 billion in military assistance to Israel, Israel itself spends 46 billion. We also give Egypt and Jordan etc. billions in military aid. You’re not necessarily antisemitic so much as you’re just kinda… wrong. And you probably feel like I’m defending Israel but I’m just stating inconvenient facts. Plenty of legitimate reasons not to like what Israel has done
-25
SituationIll5763 Mar 26, 2026 +3
20% of the population is represented by 10% of the parliament. That sounds fair, I’m sure there is a very sound reason for that. Also, does Israel recognize the Palestinian authority as a legitimate country? Or is Israel the de facto controlling authority in the West Bank and Gaza? John Kerry said that Israel can be a Jewish state or a democratic state, but he’s just an antisemite, right?
3
T4whereareyou Mar 26, 2026 +8
Settler violence is just another way of doing Lebensraum.
8
Voeno Mar 25, 2026 +165
Crazy how we have essentially watched the Holocaust part 2 in real time and not a single country has stepped in to stop it.
165
RayzTheRoof Mar 25, 2026 +56
No one stepped in to stop the Holocaust either. The only reason it ended was because countries were pulled into the war.
56
TheSouthernCommunist Mar 25, 2026 +84
Be careful you’ll draw out Bibi’s best internet propaganda commenters saying how everyone here is antisemitic.
84
isaacfisher Mar 25, 2026 -21
F*** that shit. Holocaust didn’t started with a ~~massacre~~ Jewish-conducted-bloodbath and there was no roof knocking or discussion of how aid should be distributed. This is holocaust inversion and yes, this is antisemitism. Go on downvote me.
-21
SituationIll5763 Mar 26, 2026 +11
And the cleansing of Palestinians didn’t start after October 7th. How many Palestinians need to die before you change your mind?
11
TheSouthernCommunist Mar 26, 2026 +1
Well clearly I asked for Bibi’s best and you gave me this drivel.
1
Voeno Mar 26, 2026 +1
The Holocaust did start with a massacre. Google is free.
1
isaacfisher Mar 26, 2026
Jewish massacre of Germans?
0
Voeno Mar 26, 2026 +2
Whats up with the holocaust circle jerk deniers? I am not going to argue with you when my grand parents experienced the holocaust.
2
isaacfisher Mar 26, 2026 +1
Mine as well. Read my comments again: I’m saying that the holocaust **shouldn’t** be used as parallel to the current war and is completely different from what’s going on in Gaza (sad and harsh as it may be).
1
TheTimespirit Mar 25, 2026 -131
Transporting Palestinians into cattle cars for systematic extermination… great comparison.
-131
Voeno Mar 25, 2026 +103
Holocaust doesn’t have to be the same identical plan. It just means the systematic killing of a specific race or group. In this instance its now Gaza by Israel. They are wiping them out by destroying their environment , resources , and people. Thats plan and simple a Holocaust
103
TheTimespirit Mar 25, 2026 -113
So you’re saying Israel is engaged in a systematic extermination campaign?
-113
Voeno Mar 25, 2026 +103
Thats what I said
103
Fallen_Walrus Mar 25, 2026 +59
Yea Israel is commiting a genocide is the general consensus and usually zionists are the only ones disagreeing with it genuinely
59
TheTimespirit Mar 25, 2026 -2
“General consensus” doesn’t mean anything to me. Israel has just cause for war, and whether or not their conduct during war has been acceptable or violated IHL doesn’t necessarily mean there was a genocide or that there’s an ongoing genocide. Compare the battle of Mosul and the civilian to combatant ratios when ISIS engaged in similar asymmetric warfare and civilian shield tactics.
-2
Malaix Mar 25, 2026 +37
> Israel has just cause for war No they don't. Literally everything they have suffered has been a retaliation for the genocidal colonial project they started in 1948 when they decided they were going to build a state by ethnically cleansing land of other ethnic and religious groups. In a sane world that whole area would be occupied by the UN and the two sides with decades of blood feud would be disarmed until a functioning stable two state solution is reached while Israel is pushed back to its origional borders.
37
TheTimespirit Mar 25, 2026 +8
The UN created the partition. Israel accepted even though the majority of the land they were assigned was the Negev. The Arab League did not. They attacked Israel. Israel won. The Arab League refused to accept the displaced Arabs, and/or the Arab League kicked them out and you had the invention of the “Palestinians” as eternal refugees.
8
SituationIll5763 Mar 26, 2026 +2
You have to have some real cognitive dissonance to say that the Israelis are the defenders. How can you be a defender on someone else’s land? Real life is not king of the hill, just because you can doesn’t mean you should.
2
TheTimespirit Mar 26, 2026 +1
Who’s land? What about the 900,000 Jews of MENA who were ethnically cleansed from Arab/Muslim lands, losing everything and having to flee to Israel? Cognitive dissonance? More Jews were displaced than Arabs in 1948… displaced after a war waged by ARABS.
1
whosthisguythinkheis Mar 26, 2026 +8
Boohoo a majority of genocide scholars also agree this scummy state is engaged in a genocide. No need to call the rest of the world stupid just focus on these people first. Why do you think you know more? (You don’t but I want to know how you deluded yourself)
8
fyrefox45 Mar 25, 2026 +68
You have to be on Israels payroll to not see that's the case after Gaza
68
TheTimespirit Mar 25, 2026 -7
Sorry, I don’t support Islamist terrorists and Israel has every right to defend itself. I’ve seen no evidence there’s a systematic effort to “exterminate” or destroy the Palestinians in whole or in part. Civilian casualties are not a genocide.
-7
Responsible-Bunch316 Mar 25, 2026 +57
Then explain the west bank.
57
TheTimespirit Mar 25, 2026 +4
Displacement isn’t genocide. And religious Jewish zealots should be imprisoned and kicked out of the West Bank. This still does not imply or support the idea of Holocaust or Genocide.
4
StupidMastiff Mar 25, 2026 +52
> Displacement isn’t genocide. It is. Genocide definition: >any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: (a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group. >The ICTR provided guidance into what constitutes a violation of the third act. In Akayesu, it identified "subjecting a group of people to a subsistence diet, **systematic expulsion from homes** and the reduction of essential medical services below minimum requirement" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide_Convention
52
TheTimespirit Mar 25, 2026 +9
What you quoted supports my contention. Displacement does not de facto align with the definition of a genocide. It must be as part of a broader effort to destroy a people.
9
Responsible-Bunch316 Mar 25, 2026 +36
>Displacement isn’t genocide. The word is ethnic cleansing. >And religious Jewish zealots should be imprisoned and kicked out of the West Bank But they aren't. Because the Israeli government wants them to continue. Not a single prosecution against those people in over a decade. The violence is state sponsored. >This still does not imply or support the idea of Holocaust or Genocide I mean do you need it to be one of those two things before you care?
36
TheTimespirit Mar 25, 2026 +3
I don’t know about “state sponsored”, but it is accepted and tolerated. I have no qualm calling a s**** a s**** on this. It’s unacceptable. End of story.
3
Lee-Ghandis Mar 25, 2026 +25
"Guys it's an ethnic cleansing in the West Bank, NOT a genocide!" ....Is not the flex you think it is, friend
25
TheDirtyDorito Mar 25, 2026 +25
Do you think 70000 of those deaths were all terrorists?
25
TheTimespirit Mar 25, 2026 +3
I think 30-40% of them were.
3
GhostWaffle123 Mar 25, 2026 +17
And you're okay with the rest of the deaths? Guess it takes a Zionist to write 42000 innocent deaths as just a stat. You know what, I hope the worst for you if you justify or think that even on a tangential level. Also, "think", way to be so steadfast supporting a fascist state with no proof. Absolutely pathetic.
17
GhostWaffle123 Mar 25, 2026 +18
I love the phrase "Israel has a right to defend itself" because it feels like Zionists think it has some divine right to that defense than everyone else. Really shows how they've got their head so far up their own asses that they can't even begin to comprehend that the same thing applies to others as well. On a side note, Iran has a right to defend itself too, right?
18
Lee-Ghandis Mar 25, 2026 +22
In Gaza, absolutely, yes. The vast majority of genocide scholars that have weighed in agree with this. And it is part of a larger project to ethnically cleanse or genocide all of the Palestinian territories and steal that land. You can literally go look up "Greater Israel" and the extremist history of the Likud Party and verify this yourself. Including people in Netanyahu's government just yesterday and multiple times this month endorsing Greater Israel and land seizures/ethnic cleansing.
22
Malaix Mar 25, 2026 +17
Yeah pretty obvious they have been killing arabs by the hundreds of thousands since like 1948 on and off with slow grinding attrition to kill and or displace them every movement between. People aren't making the claim its a genocidal colonial apartheid state lightly... They even flash what amounts to Lebensraum maps of "Greater Israel" where they show Israel's borders expanding from like Egypt to Kuwit and from Syria to deep into Saudi Arabia.
17
TheTimespirit Mar 25, 2026
By the hundreds of thousands, ey?
0
Malaix Mar 25, 2026 +22
Literally. Nakba saw like 700,000 Arabic residents of what is in Israel get murdered or chased out. Several towns were literally sacked by rampaging Israeli militias. There are interviews of gloating soldiers remember all the people they gunned down on camera. Israel was depopulated by like 80% of what it was in the the founding years to make room for colonization. That's a genocide. And its just been built upon continuously over the decades with slow unending attrition where they are encroached upon killed and displaced with sporadic moments of accelerated military operations that do the same with 2000 pound bombs leveling apartments and hospitals. Its been an unending nightmare for Palestinians since the 1940s.
22
TheTimespirit Mar 25, 2026 +7
Dude, can you Google? Displacement is not the same as murdered. What about the 800-900,000 Jews ethnically cleansed from Arab/Muslim countries following 1948? If we’re going just by numbers, more Jews were ethnically cleansed from the Middle East, Africa, and Iran than all the Arabs in the region following the war of 1948.
7
Malaix Mar 25, 2026 +24
Displacing people is genocide. If you take a piece of land, remove the people from it, you have genocided that land. The trail of tears in America literally did that and yes that was a genocide of native Americans. Organized efforts to remove a culture or ethnicity from a place is a genocide. >What about the 800-900,000 Jews ethnically cleansed from Arab/Muslim countries following 1948? Not good. But also done because of the actions of Israel. Its literally one of Israel's tactics to increase anti-semitism in the world so Jewish people globally feel compelled to move there and support them. That's a basic tactic of like any religious or ethnically based extremist group. Its why Israel fights so hard to conflate Judaism with the nation state of Israel. They want Jewish people to be blamed for the actions of Israel.
24
TheTimespirit Mar 25, 2026
No, displacement isn’t automatically genocide. It can be ethnic cleansing, though. So it would have been okay if we rounded up Muslims in America and kicked them out of the US after 9/11?
0
Fantastic-Purple2306 Mar 25, 2026 +23
Average Destiny Zionist
23
stealthisvibe Mar 25, 2026 +22
the holocaust in a different font
22
KDR_11k Mar 25, 2026 +10
We're at the Kristallnacht stage.
10
fyrefox45 Mar 25, 2026 +24
That was decades ago. West bank has been the ghettos of ww2.
24
Shelala85 Mar 25, 2026 +5
Yeah, they have been using loads of the same techniques of genocide used by the Nazis for decades. There is a paper from 2012,  Genocide and settler colonialism: can a Lemkin-inspired genocide perspective aid our understanding of the Palestinian situation?, which uses the techniques of genocide described in the genocide chapter of Axis Rule in Occupied Europe to evaluate whether Israel has been committing genocide. It should be noted that we don’t discuss the majority of groups targeted by the Nazis with genocide or the magority of the techniques of genocide used by the Nazis. And, of course, the Nazis did not invent many of these techniques of genocide as they had already been previously used  by other groups. My country of Canada has used some of the techniques listed in Axis Rule in Occupied Europe. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258433114_Genocide_and_settler_colonialism_can_a_Lemkin-inspired_genocide_perspective_aid_our_understanding_of_the_Palestinian_situation
5
Shelala85 Mar 25, 2026 +7
That is only one of the ways the Nazis carried out genocide. The committed genocide when they confiscated property. They committed genocide when they removed people to replace them with settlers. They committed genocide when they changed place names. They committed genocide when they placed economic restrictions on targeted groups. They committed genocide when they restricted food access for targeted groups. They committed genocide when they restricted access to blankets and fuel for targeted groups. Source: Axis Rule in Occupied Europe by Raphael Lemkin
7
N-Bizzle Mar 25, 2026 +2
Is your comment talking about what the Nazis did then or what Israel are doing now?
2
Lirael_Gold Mar 25, 2026 +2
Wait till you see how the IDF transports Palestinian detainees. (on their truck bumpers whilst they're being shot at, almost like some kind of human shield)
2
Lucklessdrip Mar 25, 2026 +61
Sorta ironic that the zionists became what they so feared and hated…. Which is a bunch of f****** nazis
61
Shelala85 Mar 25, 2026 +40
Their actions in 1948 resulted in them being compared to Nazis. >Some spectators in the Jewish quarter "jeered and even spat [at] and stoned" the surviving women and children as they were paraded through the streets." Others were apparently repulsed by the displays. Shereshevsky wrote that the "scene reminded him of how the Nazis had transported 'us' through the streets of Berlin."  >Minister of Agriculture Aharon Zisling, a native of Russia, was tormented by reports of atrocities and declared: "I couldn’t sleep all night.... This is something that determines the character of the nation... Jews too have committed Nazi acts." Source: Under the Cover of War: The Zionist Expulsion of the Palestinians by Rosemarie M. Esber 2008
40
Malaix Mar 25, 2026 +18
All fascist minded people are pretty much the same even if they brand themselves with the trimmings and paint of their tribe. And lacking the introspection or empathy and general intelligence to recognize that is core to the fascist mentality. They are literally that way because they can't comprehend why its wrong to be that way. At least not until it bites them directly in the ass. Even then probably not. The more I look at the world the more I realize its really just two factions in the end. The sane rationales who want to live and build civilizations and the insane stupid evils whose reactive impulsive stance on things would destroy everything. Including themselves. Because they fundamentally can't imagine anything beyond themselves or the future. Something in their brain just doesn't let them comprehend moderately advanced hypotheticals and abstracts. Things you need to do to build a stable long lasting society or global community. Ever watch "They Live"? Its been like that for me lately. Put on the glasses and you just see half the population around me are like that. Fundamentally different on some alien level.
18
PuzzleheadedWhile9 Mar 25, 2026 +4
The glasses show those who believe in the legitimacy of authority over others, and those who don't. It is THE common thread of all violent ideologies. Some believe in master-slave dynamics, and some oppose it. And we are a tiny minority.
4
Jstaud4 Mar 25, 2026 +15
This is always brought up, and it’s understandable, but it also obscures part of the truth about the colonization of Israel. If you go back and look at what many of the founding fathers/mothers of modern Israel were saying at the time, they showed an absolutely venomous disdain for jewish victims of the holocaust. Ben-gurion is a good place to start but there are plenty others. They had very little sympathy for “the Jews of trembling knees” and thought that it was punishment for trying to integrate with global society instead of creating their own muscular ethnostate. With that perspective, it’s not at all difficult to see how modern zionists got to be where they are.
15
I_Am_Become_Dream Mar 26, 2026 +1
It’s not ironic. It is often the case that victimized groups become oppressive if they gain power. They’ve built a model of how the world works and it’s incredibly brutal. See: Americo-liberians, Shia PMFs in Iraq, Hutus in Rwanda, Zanzibari genocide of Arabs…
1
browsk Mar 25, 2026 +27
Israel saying “never again” the rest of the quote is actually “will it be us, now it’s them”
27
datCASgoBRR Mar 25, 2026 +55
Israel is a genocidal warmonger.
55
richfernando Mar 25, 2026 +60
Israel is fascist and we cannot expect Democratic lawmakers who take money from AIPAC to stand against fascism at home or abroad.
60
Malaix Mar 25, 2026 +31
Yeah its a good litmus test for elections going forward 100%. Most zionists are that way because they are beholden to capital anyway so.. Good way to root out candidates who would sell us out to anyone for the right price.
31
no-thanks-thot Mar 26, 2026 +4
Isn't that f****** ironic? Something about chickens coming home or something?
4
TheSaifman Mar 25, 2026 +20
Knew this was 100% going to be the case when Trump said "Clean out the whole thing" about Gaza. Remember, people voted for him thinking he would be better for Palestine.
20
Gamer6322 Mar 25, 2026 +19
I dont think harris would have stopped net n yahoo either tho. AIPAC money
19
pgtl_10 Mar 25, 2026 +8
The Biden administration could have stopped but chose not to.
8
Gamer6322 Mar 25, 2026 +1
Sadly yeah.
1
EolasDK Mar 26, 2026
He is better on "Palestine"
0
karateninjazombie Mar 25, 2026 +13
That's because Israel is doing the genocide while the worlds leaders turn a blind eye.
13
Illustrious_Rope8332 Mar 25, 2026 -18
Oct 7 changed the world. FAFO.
-18
AH_Sam Mar 26, 2026 +10
FAFO, as in, Hamas commit atrocities and crimes against humanity, so we’re going to use that as an excuse to do the same? October 7th as horrific as it is doesn’t give Israel a pass to commit daily war crimes that caused close to a hundred thousand deaths.
10
whosthisguythinkheis Mar 26, 2026 +9
Yes if anything they were successful. The entire world’s people if sadly not its leaders, agree that Israel is a disgusting scummy Nazi society. FAFO indeed.
9
SituationIll5763 Mar 26, 2026 +6
The Israelis have committed crimes equal in scale every single day since then.
6
cptjtk13 Mar 25, 2026 -16
Remember, Kamala would have been WORSE y'all. /s
-16
tensor-ricci Mar 25, 2026 +14
This started with Biden btw
14
← Back to Board