Third No Kings protests to see millions across US push back on Trump administration - Anti-authoritarian rallies, taking place in all 50 states plus 16 countries, are expected to be biggest in US history
No, they will. They just won't be factual. The current MAGA circles are discussing how all the protestors are being paid to be there by George Soros.
37
Julian_ThorneMar 28, 2026
+12
they are a broken record
12
Feisty-Narwhal8400Mar 28, 2026
+7
Like...who is paying us? And where do I sign up? Cuz I've been doing this shit for free.
7
Consistent_Fly_4433Mar 28, 2026
+2
Why would they? They're an entertainment company
2
Paprika1515Mar 28, 2026
+23
Power to the people ✊🏽✊🏽✊🏽
23
CarneyVore14Mar 28, 2026
+7
On a weekend. Still important, but need to remember there is more peaceful escalation available.
7
Nwo_mayhemMar 28, 2026
+2
What would be a more peaceful escalation? Asking genuinely
2
CarneyVore14Mar 28, 2026
+3
Not doing a rally on a weekend. Sounds like May 1st, so that’s a step in that direction!
3
CrustyTh3PunkMar 28, 2026
+11
Did this on February 15th, 2003. 10 Million people worldwide was quite a feat but was able to be done because of the internet.
Watching it evolve into this is amazing, but depressing we still have to do it.
11
Admirable-Hour-4890Mar 28, 2026
+18
Unless we get in the streets and stay in the streets, these once every 6 month protest are futile.
18
RobertdBanksMar 28, 2026
+7
If protests like these were the norm throughout history nothing would have ever changed.
7
CarneyVore14Mar 28, 2026
+5
Until one of these is done during the week impacting the stock market and economy, I fear they will not have as much an impact as they should.
5
GlyphRoosterMar 28, 2026
+3
This is great, and voices are heard, but does this change anything?
3
crownandironMar 28, 2026
+11
It’s not meant to make immediate sweeping changes. It’s to remind the President that his constituents don’t like him and to remind the rest of the world that the American people they used to call allies are not yet lost.
11
the_sylinceMar 28, 2026
+19
It’s to remind us we’re not alone, we’re resisting together. Every act of resistance moves the front line just a little bit, makes the work of tyranny that much harder. We met dozens of people today at our protest, connected with strangers, and found solidarity in our neighbors
19
RobertdBanksMar 28, 2026
+2
What does any of that mean in any tangible way? How does it make tyranny harder? A weekend protest with an end time is very easy to plan around, they’re literally planned to be as non-disruptive as possible.
2
Various-Roof-553Mar 28, 2026
+7
Do you think organized change happens magically?
7
RobertdBanksMar 28, 2026
-4
How does that have anything to do with what I said?
-4
the_sylinceMar 28, 2026
+7
The psychological impact on the part of the aggrieved party is indeed tangible and lasting: the people there see that they are not alone in their frustration. Not data, not coverage, but lived experience. In turn, these people are then more inclined to resist through other channels: attending disruptive vigils, being involved in immediate and semi-immediate election campaigns, engaging with their community in a way more aligned with the character of the protest.
A scheduled and peaceful demonstration with an end time is precisely what working people need to enter the conversation, to have a hand in on the opposition process. In turn, it becomes harder for tyrannical ideology and policy to persist and be sustained, the effort on the part of the ruling party needs to grow, stretching and thinning resources.
You’re a fool if you think this single event will make tomorrow any different than it was today in a major and recognizable way; but if you’re not a fool, you can see how the effect dominoes forward and propels and emboldens opposition movements, gives people a sense of interconnectedness, community, and purpose. The most dangerous thing to an authoritative regime is a sense of purpose among its detractors.
I won’t equivocate any more on the subject, you’re looking to object. You’re either frightened or unwilling to be uncomfortable, maybe unbothered or disinterested in participating, but that’s why we were all there, so people like you can keep typing your frustrations, keep expressing your self freely; we can’t count on you to be at the front lines of protest, but you can count on us.
7
RobertdBanksMar 28, 2026
-2
>The psychological impact on the part of the aggrieved party is indeed tangible and lasting: the people there see that they are not alone in their frustration. Not data, not coverage, but lived experience. In turn, these people are then more inclined to resist through other channels: attending disruptive vigils, being involved in immediate and semi-immediate election campaigns, engaging with their community in a way more aligned with the character of the protest.
Any data on any of that?
>A scheduled and peaceful demonstration with an end time is precisely what working people need to enter the conversation, to have a hand in on the opposition process. In turn, **it becomes harder for tyrannical ideology and policy to persist and be sustained, the effort on the part of the ruling party needs to grow, stretching and thinning resources.**
What? By what means does it become harder for tyranny to impose itself? Stretching and thinning what resources? They don’t consume any resources in this scenario.
>You’re a fool if you think this single event will make tomorrow any different than it was today in a major and recognizable way; but if you’re not a fool, you can see how the effect dominoes forward and propels and emboldens opposition movements, gives people a sense of interconnectedness, community, and purpose. The most dangerous thing to an authoritative regime is a sense of purpose among its detractors.
You’re just waxing poetic without any meaningful, real evidence of anything.
>I won’t equivocate any more on the subject, you’re looking to object. You’re either frightened or unwilling to be uncomfortable, maybe unbothered or disinterested in participating, but that’s why we were all there, so people like you can keep typing your frustrations, keep expressing your self freely; we can’t count on you to be at the front lines of protest, but you can count on us.
I mean, okay, I’ll count on the few days of coverage it gets on sympathetic channels and nothing else.
-2
galtoramech8699Mar 28, 2026
+6
Yes, you just responded to this post. If the protests didn't exist you wouldn't have. That is a bit of a stretch. But my point is that this protest will take up the news for a week. Trump and team have to notice. They have to stop and think about this. And they can't say Biden or Bush or Obama had these type protests because it may be the largest. That is what it changes.
And then GOP voters into the midterms will see all these people out and ask.. why are they out?
6
Sad-Week6040Mar 28, 2026
+4
Since their last protest their pedo president added his signature to the dollar, started a war that will sink the world into a recession, initiated voter suppression attempts, threatened to invade more countries (Cuba) and broke the law in many more ways. The answer is no, these are not protests but rather a circle jerk parade for people that are too scared to do anything meaningful, so they can feel like they did something
4
SteamedGamerMar 28, 2026
+6
So what have YOU done that *was* meaningful? I'm an old guy - I call my senators and reps, participate in protests like this, and I vote in every election. Are you suggesting I need to riot and go burn down a government office? (If Trump blocks the midterm elections, I may just do that, but that's hypothetical for now!)
6
Cobs85Mar 28, 2026
+3
How have you guys only managed three protests?
3
Forsaken-Fan-3205Mar 28, 2026
+2
The "biggest in history" headline feels like a weekly DLC at this point. don't get me wrong, i'll be there with my thermos and a sign, but it’s depressing that "millions in the streets" is now just the baseline requirement to get a generic 'we hear you' press release from an administration that clearly stopped listening three executive orders ago. see you guys at the barricades, i guess.
2
monosuperboss1Mar 28, 2026
+9
"the revolution will not be televised" aka, that's the point. right wing media won't acknowledge anti right protests until there's no way to ignore it, and even then they won't show it objectively
9
iownlotsofdoorsMar 28, 2026
guy you just replied to is a bot
0
iownlotsofdoorsMar 28, 2026
+1
another f****** bot holy shit
1
eepsitMar 28, 2026
-9
We have elections. We don’t give into the rage mob.
-9
PointedlyDullMar 28, 2026
+10
Lmao a rage mob? People standing on sidewalks with signs isn’t a rage mob. I’ll direct you to Jan 6 if you want to see a rage mob
10
tcoh1sMar 28, 2026
He’ll be flattered just knowing he’s the reason for it. He’s that narcissistic.
0
fiesty_fiesta2256Mar 28, 2026
-16
No Kings is controlled opposition.
Kinda like the Dem party.
Edit: Unpopular huh? Ok what leverage has No Kings gained? What has it accomplished? What does it even stand for? Anyone that can tell me? Cuz even the website lacks direction, specific complaints, demands, or pushes to actual action.
Enjoy your corporate and think-tank sponsored complaining session XD
-16
[deleted]Mar 28, 2026
-2
[removed]
-2
M4MRDR187Mar 28, 2026
+8
Wrong, the majority of us didn't show up to vote
8
[deleted]Mar 28, 2026
+1
[removed]
1
dblan9Mar 28, 2026
+5
No they are cowards who can't admit to being racist republicans.
5
knowingmonsterMar 28, 2026
-17
It’s a state sponsored march to take your photos of faces to be put in the list. It’s a fake march
38 Comments