As someone who donated, I really would prefer the engineers work on general listnook problems instead of special "Gold Member" features. I appreciate the gesture, but I'm sure most donors aren't looking for special payback. We just want the site to stay up.
626
royalmeJul 13, 2010
+78
I wholeheartedly agree. I, for one, don't care about privileged features and just want the site to stay around and do well for everyone's benefit. I hope they find a way to improve their business model/revenue.
78
ParanoydAndroidJul 13, 2010
+37
I dunno, the ability to search/filter/reorganize my comment history would be worth yet another payment as far as I'm concerned.
The number of times I've typed something really long and in-depth and wanted to reference it later, but couldn't are infuriating.
37
KOMJul 13, 2010
+13
I see that almost as tying into r2002's point. Work on this ability for everyone with the money that some of us have given.
13
KeyserSosaJul 13, 2010
+185
...and every server we add for special features can also be used to make the site more stable...
*whistles nonchalantly*
185
r2002Jul 13, 2010
+41
You sneaky bastards. =)
41
KeyserSosaJul 13, 2010
+38
We know this isn't a solution by itself, but we hope it'll be means to a solution (or a big old spotlight on there being an actual problem..).
38
fearofcornersJul 13, 2010
+29
Perhaps you've already considered this, but I bet you could (slightly? significantly?) improve site performance by fixing the 25/500 comments to display toggle menu thing. I know it's configurable in the preferences, but I bet a whole whack of people have just flipped it to 500 because 25 is too few. You could probably speed up the site by just offering some additional values below 500.
29
r2002Jul 13, 2010
+41
>big old spotlight on there being an actual problem
If public shaming of Conde Nast was one of your goals... mission accomplished!
41
unrealiousJul 13, 2010
+1
So... the science gets done....
...**And** you make a big gun?
1
leonstagg428Jul 13, 2010
+17
i don't mean to be a nag... but i put my username into the notes section of the donation and never got my trophy :/
17
r2002Jul 13, 2010
+41
They email your Paypal account email with an activation link. I don't think the note section does anything.
41
raldiJul 13, 2010
+43
r2002 is right -- we'd make this more clear, but we can't control what's printed on the PayPal "transaction complete" page. Please write to me if you're still having problems.
43
otakucodeJul 13, 2010
+1
And every person you hire, you know, the basis of you asking for money in the first place, can help work on the new features!
1
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+6
Having 8 million registered accounts, and only 4 people on staff. I'd say they are doing a wonderful job. As I'm sure they do want to invest and improve... it's a thin line between the wonderfulness of Listnook and the whoreness of Digg.
6
funderbunkJul 13, 2010
+4
But stability doesn't do a thing for increasing revenue. Adding servers is fixing the symptom, not the disease.
4
raldiJul 13, 2010
+78
But if we spend, say, 40% of the subscription revenue on adding goldmember features, and that causes subscriptions to go up even further, that gives us a much bigger 60% to spend on general-use features.
78
grauenwolfJul 13, 2010
+27
How about spending 100% of the subscription revenue on hiring some sales staff? Self-serve advertising is fine for blogs, but without some professionals dedicated to making money you are never going to have the resources to grow this the way you want to.
Take a serious look at your advertising page. According to your sample calculations, listnook is only worth $200 per day. But for Google Addwords, which has a lot lower click-through rate, you can expect to pay $12,500 for those 50 million impressions.
Now lets say you did get a 2% CTR. 50 million impressions at Google's rate of 1 penny per click is $10,000.
If your sales team can bring in even a fraction of that you could hire teams of developers and a few metric tons of hardware. Outages would be a thing of the past and none of us would ever get any work done again.
Consider InfoQ. We are a fraction of your size and are supported mostly on advertising, but we are making money hand over fist. Seriously, sometimes I have under 2,000 hits on an article I write and they can still afford to pay me 80 bucks for the piece.
27
raldiJul 13, 2010
+16
> How about spending 100% of the subscription revenue on hiring some sales staff?
Hiring is out of our hands.
> If your sales team...
Our sales team is one person, and she's only been on the job for about two months.
16
youngluckJul 13, 2010
+18
Wait... you're not allowed to hire more staff? Jesus. I thought some of the support you needed was more hands on deck... That's why I dona-- I mean subscribed.
18
r2002Jul 13, 2010
+60
That makes sense. As long as the special features don't lead to any bitter class divisions in Listnook, your plan certainly has merit.
60
Purple_AntwerpJul 13, 2010
+90
I, for one, am looking forward to class division.
It is how I know I'm better and in a more privileged circle on the internet.
90
GNepsJul 13, 2010
+12
I don't know why, but I know you're joking, that's what I love about listnook :D
12
PhazeDKJul 13, 2010
+15
Oh no, he's serious. Seriously.
15
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+2
if you like Listnook now then you're fine. They aren't going to *take* anything from you if you insist on the site being free. however new features will preferentially go to subscribers.
I've said this before but I'll say it again--there is nothing at all inherently wrong with that. if you're poor or just like free better then that is fine, you'll still get the basic featureset of listnook. If you're willing to come up with a monthly/yearly payment then you get *extra* features. This isn't a class division thing as long as the basic functionality of the site remains unimpaired.
I do really hope we don't have an "oh woe is me I'm too poor for gold". STFU, seriously. As long as the site still works for you the way it always did then you have nothing to complain about. now, if they start taking shit away unless you pay then I'd be right on the picket line with you.
2
keebler980Jul 13, 2010
+2
The more I read into this, especially with regards to a pay subscription site, the sadder it makes me. Listnook has always been about people being on equal footing. Karmanaut is the same as SidTheMagicLobster, MrOhHai the same as tricolon. We are truly a democracy. If a paid subscription is added to allow some people better privileges or distinctions, I feel that would cause a rift. Even if its not seen by non users (/r/lounge, different name color, whatever) the trophy on the name page would be there. I'm fine with donations to help Listnook become self-sufficient, self-supportive, self-aware, or whatever through better ad and marketing techniques.
2
WitnessJul 13, 2010
+10
Viva. I don't care about any special privileges; I just want to see the site get a real, working search feature and implement other stability-related features and fixes.
10
BHSPitMonkeyJul 13, 2010
+12
Having a small, privileged subset of the community helps with rolling out features to everybody. IMHO, ideally, Gold Members will merely get to try out new site-wide features before everyone gets them.
12
gigitrixJul 13, 2010
+7
I agree. Listnook Gold will be a great place for features that are great, before they are scalable
7
Gravity13Jul 13, 2010
+49
So Listnook Gold is a go, huh?
I think it will be a hit, **provided** somethings I personally would not like to see. Namely:
- Exclusive content for Gold subscribers
- Features that give Gold subscribers a clear unfair advantage over non-Gold users (like 2x karma or something)
- Obnoxious user designations (like gold usernames, yuck)
49
ricecakeJul 13, 2010
+58
None of those things are happening. There is just a locked sublistnook that gold members get access to (It's like /r/circlejerk, except with monocles), a trophy on your user page, and a wheelbarrow full of caviar delivered by your complimentary mistress.
58
thoraxJul 13, 2010
+31
... and all of the things we're not supposed to talk about.
31
ricecakeJul 13, 2010
+18
Yes, but I'm not talking about those. His worries aren't happening, and I have to go figure out how to eat a wheelbarrow full of caviar before it goes bad.
18
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+9
[deleted]
9
KeyserSosaJul 13, 2010
+24
Those sorts of things are decidedly not what we are planning. We want to give thanks, not a sledgehammer.
24
christophelesJul 13, 2010
+22
That's too bad. I need a new sledgehammer.
22
jaciilynJul 13, 2010
+8
Can you all accept Google Checkout or Amazon payments too? I want to subscribe but my bank will not authorize anything from Paypal.
8
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+140
You know, I'm sorry, I'm not rooting for you guys. In the end run, in the meta sense, yes, I want Listnook to succeed, but this is a **_really_** bad lesson for the Listnook admins and Code Nast to get out of this.
Conde Nast executive: "Oh, we don't need to fund Listnook. The members can be counted on to support the website. We have to do cutbacks next year -- let's slash Listnook's budget by 20% and have them ask their users to make up the difference. If they can't, well, tough shit."
Listnook admin: "Oh, we don't need to confront that Conde Nast exec who gives me the willies every time he tours the office. And let's save Cool New Feature X for Listnook Gold members. The site as is is still good for the average Joe. After all, the average Joe should consider it a free 'benefit' that we're not down every five seconds now that we have our servers working again."
Listen, it's not that I'm unsupportive of you or of the site. But this is the wrong lesson to be getting out of all this.
You got bought by Conde Nast. And what you -- and all those who donated -- have just taught Conde Nast is this: **THERE'S NOW NO DOWNSIDE TO GIVING YOU AN INSUFFICIENT AND HALF-ASSED AMOUNT OF FUNDING, FAR LESS THAN YOU NEED TO ADEQUATELY RUN THE SITE -- BECAUSE THE USERS HAVE JUST DEMONSTRATED THAT THEY CAN BE COUNTED ON TO MAKE UP YOUR OPERATING SHORTFALL IN EXCHANGE FOR ONLY PLATITUDES OF LISTNOOK FRATERNITY, WITHOUT EVEN ANY MATERIALISTIC BENEFITS.**
Congratulations. Your problem is now going to get worse. Neither you nor the userbase is going to see it now, because everyone's all flush with "woooo, Listnook! woooo, Listnook Gold! go us! rah, rah, sis boom bah, gooooooo, Listnook!"
But your corporate owners are noting this, and making their plans. And it's not even evil, or sinister, in intent. It's just the cold, capitalistic bottom line that every huge corporation adheres to in order to appease their stockholders.
They're not going to give you money you don't fight for (and you've demonstrated you're not going to fight for it), and they're not going to give you money when you demonstrate that you can get your userbase to cough up dough in a donation drive.
So let's keep watching as Conde Nast rolls out Listnook's budget in whatever installments they roll it out (quarterly, annual, I don't know). And let's see what happens to your funding. Suddenly, it's going to become more and more urgent to the admins that people buy those Listnook Gold memberships. There's going to be posts to blog.listnook about how you're sorry you have to raise the Listnook Gold price to $24.95 per year, but it's more urgent than ever that people show their support for Listnook, since Conde Nast has decided to cut your funding by 25% in Q3 2011 ...
It'd be glorious if I were to be 100% wrong on this. I would be really happy if I was proven completely and utterly off base on this in the months to come, that somehow this popularity convinces Conde Nast to adequately fund you in order that Listnook might have the robust growth its popularity deserves.
Call me a cynic, though, but I don't think I *will* be proven wrong on this one, though.
As much as I'd like to be.
Oh, and to continue with the "Still Alive" theme from your blog post:
*Maybe you'll find someone else to help you.*
*Maybe Conde Nast*
*THAT WAS A JOKE.*
*HAHA. FAT CHANCE.*
140
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+21
>Conde Nast executive: "Oh, we don't need to fund Listnook. The members can be counted on to support the website. We have to do cutbacks next year -- let's slash Listnook's budget by 20% and have them ask their users to make up the difference. If they can't, well, tough shit."
This is exactly what will happen. Conde Nast will let Listnook float itself while giving them money which will require Listnook to do more more for Gold users. I like listnook but these guys really just don't have a clue. They should be banging on the Conde Nast door begging for more cash not scraping the barrel for ideas.
edit: To further explain float.
Conde Nast will see that listnook can make more money. While it may result in some bonuses being tossed around the budget for listnook from Conde Nast will adjust accordingly to the influx of new cash.
21
courageousrobotJul 13, 2010
+767
Why not spend the money on a solid marketing position rather than adding features that should be available regardless. For example, look at Digg: they add features all the time (albeit a lot of those features are downright silly). You need someone savvy enough to figure out a way to make the site profitable.
Asking for "donations" (a joke - you're a for-profit entity, so stop calling them that because you can't write this off on taxes) is merely a stopgap solution to a much larger problem.
Unless you can find a way to monetize your large user base you're just treading water. With all the extremely popular sub-listnooks, you have the ability to offer advertisers a very targeted demographic.
Personally, I have chosen to support Listnook by white-listing it from my AdBlocker and click on ads every once and a while. I will not be "donating" money to a corporation which has shown no real initiative in growing the site. Listnook's success story can be attributed to its community, not its administrators. Maybe it's time to change that.
767
bleepblorpJul 13, 2010
+61
I too have Listnook (and lots of other sites) on my ad-block white list, I donated some money, but I have to agree. Donations are fine and dandy however with out a solid long-term plan, the situation is bound to happen again. I am glad for the community coming together for a site they love and all that fun stuff, but if after 4 years Listnook is still on the losing side of profits, maybe a good look into how revenue is made for the site is in order.
61
courageousrobotJul 13, 2010
+46
The problem, from what I understand, is that Listnook employs a staff of five with primarily technical backgrounds (programmers and engineers). As qualified as they may be to keep listnook running and add to the feature-set, they've proven themselves to be dreadfully unqualified to market it.
This isn't an insult to them, but rather serves to illustrate that just throwing a few thousand dollars in donations at the problem will not solve their issues.
It's clear that Conde Nast isn't willing to sink too much more into listnook. From what I understand they were given very little oversight when listnook was purchased - and this is probably what has done them in. It's time to find some web wunderkind (think Khoo from Penny Arcade) who can take this user base and turn it into something.
46
kittyfiddlerJul 13, 2010
+20
>As qualified as they may be to keep listnook running
You must be new here.
20
raldiJul 13, 2010
+28
> Why not spend the money on a solid marketing position rather than adding features that should be available regardless.
It's much easier to get approval for more servers, or to redirect an existing engineer's priorities, than to convince the powers that be to hire a whole new person with a separate area of expertise.
28
courageousrobotJul 13, 2010
+33
But how does adding servers or "redirecting an existing engineer's priorities" help the site become more profitable? I don't see how listnook gold is anything but a stopgap measure.
I'm not disagreeing with the intention - goodness knows you guys have had a lot on your hands with scale and stability as of late - but Listnook was purchased (I'm assuming) with the intention of making a profit. I have a really hard time coming to terms with why a multi-billion dollar corporation *wouldn't* want to invest in someone who could actually make their investment start bringing in returns.
It seems to me a no-brainer.
33
raldiJul 13, 2010
+32
Us too.
32
astrofinchJul 14, 2010
+2
There seem to be a number of people in this thread who think they know how to monetize listnook. Would Conde Nast agree to a deal where you hired another employee who got paid only on commission? In other words, if listnook stayed unprofitable, they wouldn't get paid. If listnook became profitable, they would get paid a solid portion of its profits.
In the worst case, you'd get a college student who decided that listnook was more hip than whatever other unpaid internship they were considering. In the best case, this commission-based scheme could get you someone who was really qualified for the job.
2
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+14
[deleted]
14
raldiJul 13, 2010
+17
Actually, these offers are starting to come from all over the place now that the story hit everyone's Google News keyword alerts.
17
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+6
[removed]
6
jaggederestJul 13, 2010
+10
Er, you realize you can target sublistnooks with advertising, right?
10
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+120
EXACTLY, DAMMIT!!
Let's say this works. Let's just assume, for the sake of my argument, that the Listnook gold thing is just wildly successful.
When and if the site turns a profit (ha!)... who gets the benefit of that? Oh... Conde, right? Sounds like if they're hoping for the reward, they should be taking the risk, no?
120
generaladmissionJul 13, 2010
+64
What I appreciate most about Listnook is that its climate is one of generosity, not greed. Perhaps this is the time and place in which a new business model can be tested. One where advertisements don't reign, but one where those of us who are tired of 60% of our browser windows being filled with c*** have the choice to give freely to maintain the site we love, as is. I expect it's easy to avoid lining the pockets of the parent company, just be straightforward about where the donation money is being spent and don't ask for more than is necessary. Making it work long term isn't an issue. I gave today, and I'll give again when asked.
tl;dr - I disagree.
64
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+8
That isn't a sustainable option as everyone is not as generous towards corporations as you.
Listnook needs to focus on becoming profitable with the ad space it already has, while implementing a gold system can fund future projects. And if you have a problem with ads taking up 60% of your browser window then just disable them with adblock. Or buy a new monitor. In any case Listnook needs to become financially sustainable or it will slowly wither away.
8
rDr4g0nJul 13, 2010
+3
I'm with you as far as crazy idealist ideas. Everyone's all 'corporate this' and 'corporate that'. Yeah they're saying numbers and facts and stuff that are probably all true, but I choose to ignore that.
I'd rather imagine a place where people are generous and give when someone is in need... oh wait! That already happens on listnook! crazy!
Once they 'monetize' and long-termify this place will start to look like an ad machine and then everyone will complain again and some new place will be the new listnook and after 4 years it'll need to monetize and the cycle will repeat.
3
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+25
> Making it work long term isn't an issue.
That's exactly where our opinions differ, I think.
25
rz2000Jul 13, 2010
+3
You missed the point. Hate corporations iff they cannot stand on their own, but they shouldn't give their owner's money away to a 'good cause' without their consent. When government seems to do that, it is because we voted and asked them to.
Listnook **is** valuable. It has a business model for survival outside of charity, even if I am too dimwitted to identify the exact strategy.
3
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+9
Thus, Listnook should be spending money to find someone who ISN'T too dimwitted to identify the exact strategy, instead of building new "gold only" bullshit features.
9
rz2000Jul 13, 2010
+3
I couldn't [agree with you more](http://www.listnook.com/r/announcements/comments/cnth8/making_ends_meet_tldr_remember_that_joke_about/c0txqvf?context=3).
I've also agreed that is a remotely possible, though unlikely, business plan:
>Those donations are ostensibly what make the corporation's expenditures on servers and salaries for Listnook logical, not out of charity on its part, but because those donations *are* the income Listnook would be producing. There is no reason that Condé Nast should support one of its businesses unless supporting it makes them more money, no matter how much Condé Nast is making from its other businesses.
>I personally think that donations are an unsustainable model. For instance if the site goes down less often would people donate more or donate less?
-[somewhere here](http://www.listnook.com/r/technology/comments/co3cz/listnook_asks_users_for_money_to_hire_people/c0u0i3n?context=3)
I was wrong to say you don't get the point, since you completely get the point I'm trying to make. However, my corollary is that it isn't the parent organization alone that makes Listnook a concern that should be able to makes it on its own way.
3
Game_EnderJul 13, 2010
+4
They did take a risk. They have spent $10 million, and it sounds like they haven't really earned that all back yet.
4
stereosaurusJul 13, 2010
+42
How about donations go to hire one person (more if it can be afforded), whose entire job is dictated by Listnook Gold members. Salary, duties, break times - a webcam feed would obviously be necessary, but the fees for this can come out of the funds/salary. Weekly performance reviews by the Gold Overlords would of course be necessary to maintain the position.
There is of course no downside to this plan whatsoever.
42
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+24
[deleted]
24
repomanJul 13, 2010
+8
I would like to have this job, as I currently sit at a desk and answer the screams of 1000 motherless goats that I call coworkers all day long. Therefore, I am amply qualified to deal with listnook gold users.
8
phudabulahJul 13, 2010
+21
Word. These donations are a short-sighted goal and not gonna do anything for Listnook in the long run. Expect another blog post asking for donations in a while.
21
SloaneRangerJul 13, 2010
+12
What troubles me, is what happens in a couple of years when listnook isn't making money and Conde sell it to another company? Are they going to give the money back?
I'm certainly not intending to donate to a multinational corporation who refuse to invest in their own project. It seems to me that one of the fundamental tenets of business is that you invest money, and often lose money in the early years in order to improve your long term potential. If Conde aren't willing to do that, f*** 'em.
12
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+21
Works for NPR and Wikipedia. The problem with ads is they don't work, they poison the 'atmosphere' and they chase off users. I'm happy to keep buying Listnook Gold, but if it starts looking like Digg around here, with big stupid animated ads every few inches, I'm gone.
21
SelfHighFiveJul 13, 2010
+9
Sure, but I think NPR & Wiki draw in much bigger donors than listnook relative to their costs.
That's probably not going to change, either. "Contributions" are already a tough sell (remember Wiki begging for cash?), but contributions for Keanu photoshops? Good luck.
9
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+18
I don't know, Wikipedia raises a lot of money. One problem with doing that with Listnook though is tomorrow Conde Naste might decide to sell it to Newscorp or something. And then we will have to destroy listnook, to save all of reality.
18
SelfHighFiveJul 13, 2010
+3
Agreed. I'd go further: earning money in a way that differentiates listnookors may quickly become a problem.
I get adding contributor-only features: without compensation, "contributions" are hard to sustain, and listnook's only way of compensating is providing features.
But it's going to be very hard to make features that are worthwhile for contributors and don't marginalize non-contributors. Poor features puts listnook back on relying on contributor generosity for revenue. Great features will turn some non-contributors away. There's no telling how many, nor whether future new users would contribute as much as listnook veterans.
Listnook either figures out how to monetize itself _without_ stratifying listnookors, or you ultimately have a smaller, more dedicated, listnook membership base. The latter is fine--it's just not what listnook is right now.
3
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+4
Contributors don't want features. We want a working Listnook that's all. And while some features or bonuses or thank yous are cool, in the end as long as Listnook stays up I'll be happy.
Now I'm not saying that expect Listnook to be running flawlessly forever from now on. As in IT professional I know this to be impossible. We just want Listnook to be better and right now better means more stability. And... a working search function.
4
sshconnectionJul 13, 2010
+3
> Listnook's success story can be attributed to its community, not its administrators.
I assume that by administrators, you do not mean the engineers. Listnook's success story would be a very short chapter indeed without the tireless efforts of an incredibly small team working to keep this service up and running for its community to enjoy. I agree that there should be a better revenue model to ensure that Listnook will continue to be viable long into the future. That said, let's try to be constructive in our criticisms while giving due appreciation to the people who build the infrastructure that allows our community to exist.
**tldr**: If gold members get vuvuzelas, I'm out.
3
aftliJul 13, 2010
+16
As somebody who makes some of his living off of internet advertising, please stop clicking on ads "once in awhile" and instead click on ads that *interest you*.
16
courageousrobotJul 13, 2010
+35
That's why I only click on the ads "once in a while".
If I find an ad relevant or interesting, I click it.
35
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+24
That would be a big fat never.
24
neoabraxasJul 13, 2010
+3
Because you probably don't go to forums to read about your hobbies. I'm a big snooker buff and I bought a couple of things off the main snooker internet forum because I genuinely wanted the items and learned about them from the ads on that site.
Listnook knows what I'm into. They have a potentially huge advertising income on their hands if they can build smart ad serving into their engine. I tell listnook every day what I "like" and "don't like". If they use that info to serve me better ads then they may get somewhere.
3
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+11
[removed]
11
Ol_Dirty_BastardJul 13, 2010
+11
I thought that was qgyh2 buying sponsored links for his own referrals...
11
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+4
[deleted]
4
gtkJul 13, 2010
+7
A serious suggestion here. If you are really having money problems then perhaps you should employ someone/work on improving the targeting of the ads that you display. I gotta say that I've never seen an ad on listnook that I would even remotely think about clicking on, or that has had any relevance to me whatsoever (listnook is not alone in this).
You know, if people are subscribed to the movies listnook then maybe you should show ads for up-and-coming movie releases (I would actually love this). Similarly for music/books and their more specific sublistnooks. (Would anyone who is subscribed to the heavymetal sublistnook really be upset if they were shown ads for new heavy metal releases?) They don't even have to be flashy animated ads. People who are interested in these topics (as evidenced by their subscribing to that sublistnook) will actually actively click on simple static images simply stating that the movie/album is coming soon, click the ad for more information.
Of course, you should still stick to the golden rules of not pissing off listnookors (no ads that make sounds, popup, or popover. Also, give us the option to block specific ads that we find too distracting or are uncomfortable with having appear on our screens in our mixed gender work environments, like the grandma b**** ad).
*Edit: Even better, why not create "virtual sublistnooks" such as /r/movie_ads that display movie ads when you subscribe to that sublistnook?
7
bnookalaJul 13, 2010
+53
That pikachu postcard was written by my friend! We dropped by listnook HQ on Saturday evening. A few more shots:
[All five postcards!](http://www.flickr.com/photos/bnookala/4787923042/)
[Postcards, I choose you!](http://www.flickr.com/photos/bnookala/4787922938/)
[Bulbasaur!](http://www.flickr.com/photos/bnookala/4787922122/)
[And a pic of us writing nice things on them](http://www.flickr.com/photos/bnookala/4787921966/)
Glad to hear things are looking good for listnook!
53
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+16
I envy those with gold membership. I can't join. I'm too paranoid about attaching my on-line activities to my real life identity. I can't even keep the same username for more than a month. The saydrah episode creeped me out. She left a crumb trail back to her real life; a trail that she made one little crumb at a time. No one believes it can happen to them until it happens. She should have known better.
Listnook's biggest selling point for me is the ease of throwing away accounts, throwing away my current identity. It's more important to me than karma.
tl;dr -- No financial transactions, No home address, no personal info about preferences. We're not really friends and I don't really trust you.
16
raldiJul 13, 2010
+14
Send us a postcard from some city where you don't live.
14
TelekinesisJul 13, 2010
+44
[Samuel Irving Newhouse, Jr.](http://bit.ly/9AqomT) Owner of Condé Nast Publications
Net worth: 4billion
132nd Richest American by Forbes Magazine in 2009.
And he needs help with the servers.
You're not short on money, it was an experiment. The fact is your owner there is doing ridiculously fine, he just wants even more money and he's not beneath feigning being needy to ask for donations from the actually truly needy (AKA us). Donating to Multi-Billionaires stinks. :c
44
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+30
This is important to point out. It means one of two things... either it was a big experiment, or listnook is really a failing entity, and the owners know it. The reality is that the old model of internet success doesn't always apply anymore. People don't click on ads like they used to.
Personally, I love listnook. But at the end of the day, I don't really care if listnook disappears. I won't donate to the multi-billion company that owns it because ultimately, there will be something to replace it should it fail. I like coming here, but my life will be just fine without it. I have nothing against people donating, but I have a feeling (just a guess) that this comment represents the more-silent majority here.
30
sidewalkchalkedJul 13, 2010
+7
Exactly. That's what not being said, that we the users know who really brings the value to the site....It's the community. And the community doesn't go away when things go south. When digg went south many people came to listnook. When listnook goes south we'll go somewhere else. But we aren't prone to paying for services that we KNOW could be available for free.
7
AzuredJul 13, 2010
+58
This will be viewed as a case study in business schools for years to come.
"There are a number of ways to avoid going under. Diversification, sourcing investors, cost cutting, selling non-essential assets, restructuring..."
"Then there's one more. But I really shouldn't say..."
"Please tell us professor!"
"Well, ok. But you didn't hear this from me. It's known as... the *Listnook model*."
58
davelogJul 13, 2010
+5
I heard 'the *listnook model*' in my brain as Steve Martin reading Cruel Shoes.
5
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+3
[deleted]
3
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+30
Glad this worked well. But I have to tell you that Slashdot made very little money off of subscriptions. It was never really worth the money for what they were offering. You've really got to make Gold do something cool here. Well, either that or get serious about ad sales.
30
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+26
But whatever you do, please, please, please don't take things away for people without Listnook Gold. Just add new features for the ones who do have it.
26
KeyserSosaJul 13, 2010
+69
We wouldn't dare. Also, we really want any additional features to have more of a "thanks!" sort of feel rather than a "BOW DOWN BEFORE ME I AM YOUR GOD!" vibe.
We're not giving extra votes and everyone is equal in the eyes of the spam filter.
69
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+3
> "BOW DOWN BEFORE ME I AM YOUR GOD!" vibe
That had not occurred to me.
...I'm a little concerned now.
3
KeyserSosaJul 13, 2010
+13
wait. I was trying to make everyone *less* worried.
13
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+21
[deleted]
21
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+6
IANAL, but I'm pretty sure using charitable donations to fund a for-profit venture is kind of a no-no
6
arronskyJul 13, 2010
+106
I've gone Listnook gold... here's the one thing you guys should really fix-- **please stop calling it a 'donation.'** That word is weighted, and has a lot of meaning behind it that you're not intending. The contribution is neither a tax deduction, nor are you a charity. You should call it a contribution or something similar, the last thing you need is a headache from people who claim their Listnook 'donation' as an IRS deduction and get you in financial hot water.
106
raldiJul 13, 2010
+104
> here's the one thing you guys should really fix-- please stop calling it a 'donation.'
I wasn't aware we were. Where do you see us calling it a donation?
We can't control the verbiage on PayPal's site, and I believe in our own language, we always use the term "subscription" because very soon you'll actually be getting something more than a trophy for your money.
104
placidpplJul 13, 2010
+36
> Where do you see us calling it a donation?
On the main Gold page [here](http://www.listnook.com/help/gold) you're using the paypal "Donate" button. Create a new button graphic and you can specify it in the hidden form html when creating a PP button. Use:
36
parsimJul 13, 2010
+17
PayPal only allows "donations" have a user-set price. Everything else must have a vendor-set price.
Listnook can change the button image, but PayPal will still ask for a "donation amount" when you click it.
17
JeedJul 13, 2010
+10
This.
Ladies and Gent's I think we're going a tad harsh on our admins today considering this is a "thank you users" thread :)
10
raldiJul 13, 2010
+36
Ooh, that's a nice trick. Thanks!
36
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+45
Does subscription imply that you have to continually contribute money to retain Listnook Gold status?
45
DoTheDewJul 13, 2010
+97
I hope not. I just can't afford to keep donating 1 million dollars *every* month.
97
kibitzorJul 13, 2010
+7
eh, It's a fine use of the word, just not how we're used to it.
> n 1: a voluntary gift (as of money or service or ideas) made to
some worthwhile cause [syn: contribution]
[definr](http://definr.com/donation)
> the act or an instance of donating: as a : the making of a gift especially to a charity or public institution b : a free contribution : gift
[m-w.com](http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/donation)
7
CrayshJul 13, 2010
+31
**Donation**: a voluntary gift (as of money or service or ideas) made to some worthwhile cause. If made to a qualified non-profit charitable, religious, educational or public service organization, it may be deductible as a contribution in calculating income tax.
Donation is correct, it's just not tax deductible in this case.
31
KevinMcCallisterJul 13, 2010
+15
Great now please use some of that money to generate more money so you will never have to do this again.
15
syrinxStarmanJul 13, 2010
+50
We just bailed out listnook. I think that means it's... *dun dun dunnn!!* TOO BIG TO FAIL!
50
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+8
[deleted]
8
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+22
What happened with the guy who wanted to buy Listnook?
22
_YourMomJul 13, 2010
+5
I donated to Listnook, but I am completely f****** against Gold-only subscriber features. A trophy is enough for me. I don't even want my name to be a separate color. Don't turn this site into a shitfest. I donated because I want to keep this great site alive. I wouldn't've if I had known that it would make the site less great. Please, don't create subscriber-only features.
5
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+8
What is the thing I'm going to love? Oh god, please tell me. I have a heart condition, I don't know if I can stand the wait.
8
ricecakeJul 13, 2010
+3
It's a change to something old.
Do you want to know what it is?
...
...
...
...
*They're tweaking the envelope color, and changing the page layout.*
I heard it from a dude. It's true.
3
KeyserSosaJul 13, 2010
+17
***who told you about Operation Cakefuck!?***
17
ricecakeJul 13, 2010
+3
I... I don't know. He told me I could call him 'Ed', and he spoke to me from the shadows. He told me many things, and I didn't know what to believe, but he insisted this was the most important. He mentioned a tangled web of conspiracy, lies, and corporate power plays spanning to the highest levels, but he didn't have time to explain.
He told me that if I found myself in danger, I could seek protection from 'the king', whoever that is, and then disappeared into depths of the coffee shop, leaving me with more questions than answers.
*Please don't hurt me.*
His link: http://www.listnook.com/r/view/user/Syphon8/
His real profile: http://www.listnook.com/user/Syphon8
82
deaathleopardsJul 13, 2010
+19
I figured that from the weird link he used but, I still am interested to find out how he did it!
19
alphabeatJul 13, 2010
+60
/r/view is run by sephyr and ytknows, you might remember them from oh.....circlejerk and listnookhax! I'm guessing they're behind the CSS trickery.
60
flasher1001Jul 13, 2010
+19
The sort of trickery can be found here: http://www.listnook.com/r/view/stylesheet.css?v=97028d40049f546a8ab367656e0f5bc7. For example:
/* link karma */
.karma:nth-child(3):after {
content: ",923"
}
/* comment karma */
.karma:nth-child(5):after {
content: ",412"
}
19
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+19
Those guys? A couple of trolls, if you ask me.
19
SidtheMagicLobsterJul 13, 2010
+16
I think I read somewhere you get into Listnook Platinum if you buy the admins a hooker.
16
Syphon8Jul 13, 2010
+18
No, that's how you get the Pimp Hat trophy.
18
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+6
Platinum users can do that.
6
ReaverXaiJul 13, 2010
+5
Wow, so little karma...
http://www.listnook.com/r/alpha/user/reaverxai
5
LoggJul 13, 2010
+11
>Listnookor for 4 years
>Two-year club
ಠ_ಠ
11
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+36
I signed up for listnook vinyl before the site was ever popular.
36
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+15
Pfft, Sumerian cuneiform on clay is where it's at... fuckin' hipsters these days, I swear.
15
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+72
I still like the idea of having a @listnook.com email address
72
dzneillJul 13, 2010
+229
Listnook must exist, I'm **not** going back to Digg.
229
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+45
I think it's in my employer's best interest to make sure listnook goes under.
45
NancyGracesTesticlesJul 13, 2010
+14
If listnook died tomorrow I'd just spend more time at some of the other great aggregators out there while the next big site gears up.
Although it would be annoying have to actually go to 4chan as opposed to waiting for their content to get posted to /r/pics or /r/wtf.
14
wdisjJul 13, 2010
+108
Am I the only one who discovered Digg after Listnook?
108
afterwegoJul 13, 2010
+57
Read Digg, then read Digg and Listnook, now I just read Listnook. That should say something right there.
57
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+7
Digg burned me, banned my account because I did not role play as a Digg fratboy. I do not take this lightly. One thing about Listnook is they have a pretty high threshold for saying stupid shit and this is a good thing and I recognize them for it. I have been banned from almost every single discussion site I have interacted with. In the early days, if you fucked with the admin or were critical of a site, it was like **BAM** you were gone. The one time it was fun is a friend subscribed me to a Melissa Etheridge fan discussion group as a prank. I told the group she had stayed over at my house and had left a pair of socks, they had not been laundered and I was making them available for-sale to the group. They divided up into two camps, the smarter ones got the joke and thought it was hilarious, but most of them got very angry and **BAM** it was ban time.
7
cursoryusernameJul 13, 2010
+16
So... you still have the socks??
16
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+13
Shit, I've been here since lisp.
13
spootJul 13, 2010
+6
I discovered Listnook before digg. I found Listnook from an XKCD reference.
6
DoTheDewJul 13, 2010
+7
I discovered listnook from their iPhone app. I'm not even sure what I did on the Internet prior to that since I didn't use any of the other sites like Digg, or Fark, or whatever else there is. I'm pretty sure I just stared at my desktop or something, wait better check facebook, ok back to desktop.
7
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+6
[deleted]
6
KrustyBunkersJul 13, 2010
+20
Sorry, already exists. You'll be amazed how many pictures of your mom are on there...
20
tripacer99Jul 13, 2010
+265
Thanks for the upd ** *A Listnook Gold™ account is required to see the rest of this comment.* **
265
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+129
For non-gold members:
> tripacer99 [Trent Arbijitz, tracert97@live.com] 23 points 8 minutes ago [-]
> Thanks for the update last night that allows us to see the real names and emails of all users on listnook. I think this will bring a greater sense of community and responsibility amongst the people at listnook. It's certainly made /r/gonewild a lot more enjoyable! ^_~
129
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+313
...but apparently not required to post it. ;)
313
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+55
Is it socially correct for novelty accounts to get listnook gold? I ask only because I want to support the site that allows me to express my vivid imagery.
I think I'm going to. Simply put; not doing it would be like defecating into a lawn mower so that Malcolm Reynolds can become one with the force.
Opinion?
55
drgradusJul 13, 2010
+13
If it helped the Captain, sure I'd defecate into a lawn mower. That makes *perfect sense to me*.
13
raldiJul 13, 2010
+4
Perhaps we could raise money with an auction, and one of the top items would be that you would go to a thread of the buyer's choice and make a rare *sensical* analogy.
4
a_dagJul 13, 2010
+155
OH BURN
155
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+86
RIP tripacer99 dignity
86
xlamplighterJul 13, 2010
+25
No Listnook Gold? No Problem! Just use your Zynga SheepID and sign up for FREE Video Profess'r DVDs.
(Warning: Video Profess'r will ravage your bank account like a dog in heat before you press Play.)
25
DoTheDewJul 13, 2010
+15
I think you meant OH *DUST*.
15
Gravity13Jul 13, 2010
+49
I paid $20 to see "ate."
God dammit.
49
madmanz123Jul 13, 2010
+40
Um, so how much did you take in? Fair question since I donated :)
40
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+32
[deleted]
32
LoneloboJul 13, 2010
+28
mysterious sink toothbrush psychotic secretive fanatical icky panicky aback escape
*This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
28
SkyMarshalJul 13, 2010
+5
You can guess a range. We know ~6000 donated. Assume the average was $10, that would be $60k. Assume it was $20, that would be $120k. Probably somewhere in that range.
5
raldiJul 13, 2010
+18
I'm afraid we haven't gotten the green light to discuss that yet. You'll just have to measure the change in site performance, calculate how many new Cassandra nodes it would take to effect said change, and multiply it by the cost of one Amazon EC2 server.
18
mmm_burritoJul 13, 2010
+6
Can you discuss if the money went straight to listnook or not?
6
raldiJul 13, 2010
+10
The money hasn't gone anywhere yet. Frankly, the whole thing kinda caught the powers that be by surprise.
10
Measure76Jul 13, 2010
+9
>the whole thing kinda caught the powers that be by surprise.
Are they suprised as in, "this made more money than we thought it would," or are they suprised as in "You made up gold accounts with no immediate benefits to your users and then charged them for it, and still made money!?"
9
raldiJul 13, 2010
+33
More like, "You did WHAT while we were in the Hamptons on Friday?!?"
33
conorpJul 13, 2010
+47
Excited for the *One More Thing*!
47
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+93
It must be the long-rumored ListnookPhone!
93
daggityJul 13, 2010
+34
Think I'll wait for the listnookPad.
34
segoliJul 13, 2010
+17
Naw, man, it doesn't have flash or a camera. I'd wait for the 2nd-gen listnookPad.
17
flyingponytailJul 13, 2010
+4
I want an ilistnook gold.
I dont care.
I want an ilistnook gold.
I dont care.
4
maragesicJul 13, 2010
+28
Oh god, not RealID?????
28
raldiJul 13, 2010
+27
Actually, it's FakeID, the exact opposite. Everyone has to have a name associated with their account, but it's somebody else's name.
27
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+21
I donated 6 comments today. Just doing my part.
21
Avatar_KoJul 13, 2010
+22
Oh great, this link made the front page. Here come all the non-gold members...
22
AJRiddleJul 13, 2010
+8
Am I the only one who thinks this is a bad thing? Listnook.com is one of the most visited sites on the internet, yet isn't sustainable without donations or subscriptions?
Is the solution really to start charging people for more features and leave those who cannot afford it in the dust?
8
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+8
Here's something I don't get... Digg is clearly a hated rival here, but can we take a peek at their model for a second here?
They serve up much higher volume (more users, higher page sizes, etc), and they've managed to do just fine. They also aren't backed by a major corporation, that I know of, like Listnook is. Their staff costs are monstrous compared to Listnook's.
I know it's been said, but listnook is very nearly a text-only site that feeds off the creative efforts of the rest of the web. That's a fact.
You run ads in several locations. I don't know the performance, and I don't care. All I know is that **I don't block ads on Listnook**.
You can't seem to make even the most basic things work here, like uptime, let alone search.
I have no idea how you can't run things on your ads and traffic and lower costs, but ff this gold c*** doesn't work, just close up shop already. It's pretty embarrassing at that point.
8
The_DHCJul 13, 2010
+66
I love /r/lounge! 86% like it!
66
NiqulazJul 13, 2010
+98
Ah yes. The place where the chaps adjust their monocle and generously hand out upyachts to one another. Such a fabulous place.
98
abnormalsyndromeJul 13, 2010
+76
upyachted
76
kibitzorJul 13, 2010
+25
Shut up shut up shut up!
\*starboardvoted\*
there. i hid it.
25
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+32
Ah fellow lounger, we shan't let the "regular" Listnook users know of our secret oasis. Hush, I beg you!
32
youngluckJul 13, 2010
+16
His butler's butler has obviously accessed his account. He must have him beat with Chicken Sausage, imported from Italy.
16
trukinJul 13, 2010
+5
Ah yes, it appears that 14% of bots have generous programming behind them
5
gottareaditJul 13, 2010
+2
The one way for Listnook to produce an income would be to fill their pages with ads. I would hate this, and so would you. The donation gold would be temporary. There are other ways to raise cash. I hate to look at Farmville as an example, but they have an interesting concept in using farm cash for buying personalized items for their farms. If Listnook made it fun for the user to part with their money, it might be good for all.
My idea would be to sell little Listnook aliens to be next to your name. Offer 10 different styles at first. It would be fun, because we could recognize each other by our alien or combination of aliens. You could sell them for $5.00 a pop. Everyone would want an alien because Listnook users are fun people with a sense of humor. We could have Listnook Alien designing contests. Each user could have a storage box for their collection and bring out an alien to suit the mood for the day. Birthday Alien for when they are having a birthday, etc.
What do you guys think?
2
pancakeswithlemonJul 13, 2010
+51
Listnook is my favorite site, donating to support it is the least I can do.
51
HungLikeAMidgetJul 13, 2010
+25
I'm kind of strapped for cash at the moment but I donated $10. The way I see it, I've had way more than 10 dollars worth of use from listnook over the years.
25
Gravity13Jul 13, 2010
+34
On that note, it would be a pretty cool idea if you could donate to listnook on behalf of a listnookor. Like, if I liked your comment enough, I could donate $1 to listnook on your behalf (understandably, micro-payments may not be the best course of action), 10 people do it and you have listnook gold! This could be a great way for people strapped for cash to get in on the fun too...
34
teurastajaJul 13, 2010
+3
Reminds me of deviantArt's new system: you can buy points, and 400 points costs 5$. Then you can donate them one or two at a time, if you want to, and also buy prints and everything with those.
Personally, I haven't had much experience with it, but it seems to work fine. The idea is sensible, though I don't think it would suit listnook well - I have a feeling we don't need to turn karma scores into a real game with real money.
3
Gravity13Jul 13, 2010
+6
Yeah, but that's like trading money. This would be like, "I find your contributions to listnook to be so valuable, that on your behalf I will contribute a bit of money to help keep the site as great as it is so there will be more people like you."
6
AndooJul 13, 2010
+2
It's funny how many of us are willing to dish out our advertising and marketing ideas for the sake of listnook ending up to be what WE MOTHERFUCKING WANT IT TO BE!
On a sidenote, we need to start selling rage comic t-shirts from the fffffffffuuuuuuuuuuuuu sub listnook. I know I would buy a few for social situations. For example, I would take my 'girl raging at a movie theatre' shirt when I go to see a movie.
As I mentioned, listnook can be whatever we want it to be. I have faith the engineers won't f*** us with the future of our precious. It's not that this place is any better than digg or fark, it's that the people here seem more genuine in both their advice and their jokes. I also don't know how many retarded stepchildren you'd have to shit out to make your comment layout as bad as the other sites. If you found a way to f*** that up I would just leave.
2
ZoidbergMDJul 13, 2010
+5
>Oh, and there's One More Thing coming soon that you guys are gonna love.
This had better be either working search or episode 3.
5
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+48
What people are failing to realize is that Listnook **is not** a charity case. Listnook owned by a **billion** dollar company (Conde Nast). Why are we donating money to Listnook when they should be getting funds from their parent company?
48
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+30
[deleted]
30
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+7
You remember how 4chan said a while back that they where going to come here and troll us?
The constant jokes about 4chan gold accounts has gotten to the point where the admins have started to take this seriously, and actually implemented this feature.
Unless this all turns out to be a joke and the biggest reverse troll by the admins in the history of the listnookt, 4chan will have pulled off with listnook what it never could with 4chan, gold accounts.
They couldn't change their own site, no gold accounts on 4chan, no matter how many times people post those same pictures, there are constant jokes about listnook turning into 4chan. Listnook gets gold accounts.
Let that settle in for a second.
7
chozarJul 13, 2010
+4
I wonder how the Techcrunch article spins this tomorrow.
I also wonder how digg spins this next week.
4
[deleted]Jul 13, 2010
+6
I'm debating on donating simply because I want a trophy in my case. I'm that sad.
195 Comments